UserWiki:DerVampir666

Hello everyone! This is a basic list of my positions on social, political, and economic affairs. For further elaboration, visit my self-insert page or visit my blog.

Civics

 * [[File:Fed.png]] Federalism
 * [[File:Authdem.png]] Authoritarian Democracy
 * [[File:Technocracy.png]] Technocracy
 * [[File:Cybercr.png]] Cyberocracy
 * [[File:COINTELPRO.png]] Deep Statism

Economy

 * [[File:EconNat.png]] Economic Nationailsm
 * [[File:NeoMerc.png]] Neo-Mercantilism
 * [[File:Corp.png]] Corporatocracy
 * [[File:Regulationism.png]] Regulationism
 * [[File:Welf.png]] Welfare State
 * [[File:Statecap.png]] State Capitalism
 * [[File:LibSyndieSam.png]] Trade Unionism

Culture

 * [[File:AmericanNat.png]] American Nationalism
 * [[File:AntiRacism.png]] Anti-Racism
 * [[File:AntiAntiAbortion.png]] Pro-Abortion
 * [[File:Anat.png]] Mandatory Esperanto
 * [[File:Transh.png]] Transhumanism
 * [[File:Post-Genderism.png]] Post-Genderism

[[File:WelfLib.png]] Welfare State [[File:WelfLib.png]]
I'm a supporter of the welfare state. I see safety nets as necessary for the preservation of a market economy for two reasons: Welfare programs I support include a universal basic income (UBI), retirement and disability insurance (Social Security), profit sharing (ESOPs), public health insurance (though allow private options), and public works.
 * 1) Ignoring the anti-human consequences of the system, such as homelessness and joblessness, fuels [[File:Pop.png]] populist and [[File:Soc.png]] socialist sentiment. For example: mass unemployment caused by automation in 19th century [[File:Cball-UK.png]] Britain led to [[File:Ludd.png]] Luddite [[File:Terrorist.png]] terrorism.
 * 2) Consumption is a primary source of econoimc growth, as producers respond to demand. (As the [[File:Keynes.png]] Keynesian axiom goes: "Demand creates its own supply.") So a welfare state which subsidizes leisure, even if it allows the naturally unproductive to lead "parasitic lifestyles," is a net positive.

[[File:PlannedCap.png]] Social Wealth Funds [[File:Nordmodel.png]]
I'm an enthusiastic supporter of social wealth funds (SWFs) and public holding companies (PHCs). Such investment vehicles will generate substantial profits for the state. They woud invest not only in non-commodity goods and natural resources, but also wage goods to augment state profits. They would purchase minority or majority shares in successful companies like  Amazon and  Facebook. In other countries where such schemes are implemented, the state appoints representatives to company boards to influence management. This would have numerous benefits, such as tying stakeholder interests to shareholder profits, reducing economic inequality, and reducing private-sector taxation. To quote Matt Bruenig's commentary on Norway's oil-based SWF:

[[File:EconNat.png]] Industrial Policy [[File:Indust.png]]
W.I.P.

Positive
W.I.P.

Mixed
W.I.P.

Negative
W.I.P.

Influences
This is a list of people who helped shape my views directly or second-hand. Note that I do not agree with everything some people listed here believed or said.

Further Resources
My blog

Comments

 * - economically too moderate,but have other good take tbh,and I much perfer you compared to the Polish PiS establishment.
 * [[File:Vamp.png]] DerVampir666 - Thanks, I guess.
 * [[File:Omega.png]] Omega1065 - Braun, my buddy, did you just became an unironic State Liberal ? Not the worst ideology but it's pretty odd tbh.
 * [[File:Vamp.png]] DerVampir666 - If it wasn't treated like a joke, even on the main page for it, I actually wouldn't object to that label.
 * [[File:Glencoe.png]] Glencoe - my my how the mighty have fallen still not the worse though your ideology is kinda like my right wing twin we both have similar end goals after all though i guess for diffrent philosophical reasons due to me being a utilitarian