UserWiki:Matteel

Hello, and welcome to my page! My ideology is, the self-insert of the user  Matteel. Mattism is an individualist ideology that is  civically liberal,  democratic,  culturally reformist, economically  center-left, militarily  non-Interventionist,  patriotic,  left-populist, and diplomatically  internationalist.

[[File:Consti.png]] Introduction [[File:Consti.png]]
Matteel has been a lurker on the subreddit ever since 2021 and a user of this wiki since the old one got shut down (I hadn't made an account at the time), and around summer started being active on it. I've contributed to both r/polcompball and to r/polcompballanarchy and I'm flaired as Social Democracy on the offical subreddit.

Governmental Views

 * [[File:Liberal_Democracy.png]] Liberal Democracy


 * [[File:Fed.png]] Federalism


 * [[File:Semidirect.png]] Semi-Direct Democracy


 * [[File:Semiprez.png]] Semi-Presidential System


 * [[File:DefDem.png]] Defensive Democracy


 * [[File:Reform.png]] Reformism (In democracies)


 * [[File:Revolution.png]] Revolution (In autocracies)


 * [[File:Consti.png]] Constitutionalism


 * [[File:Republicanismpix.png]] Republicanism


 * [[File:Secular.png]] Secularism


 * [[File:Lpop.png]] Left-Wing Populism


 * [[File:Civilib.png]] Civic Liberalism

Economic Views

 * [[File:Neocorporatism.png]] Neo-Corporatism
 * [[File:Dirigisme.png]] Dirigisme
 * [[File:Cooperative Socialism.png]] Encouraged Cooperative Economy
 * [[File:Regulationism.png]] Economic Regulationism
 * [[File:Welf.png]] Welfare Statism
 * [[File:Keynes.png]] Mixed Market Economy
 * [[File:EconProg.png]] Economic Progressivism
 * [[File:Socgeo.png]] Welfare Georgism

Foreign Views

 * [[File:Globnat.png]] Alter-Globalism
 * [[File:Ecoglob.png]] Environmental Globalization
 * [[File:Postconan.png]] Anti-Colonialism
 * [[File:Pac.png]] Non-Interventionism
 * [[File:Protect.png]] Fair-Trade Protectionism
 * [[File:Leftnat.png]] Left-Wing Nationalism
 * [[File:Cball-Taiwan.png]] Pro-ROC
 * [[File:Native.png]] Indigenous Rights
 * [[File:Cball-Ukraine.png]] Pro-Ukraine
 * [[File:Cball-Albania.png]] Albanian Reunification
 * [[File:Demcon.png]] Pro-Kurdish Independence
 * [[File:AntiBaath.png]] Anti-Assad
 * [[File:Zio.png]] Two State Solution [[File:Cball-Palestine.png]]
 * [[File:Euroscept.png]] Left-Wing Euroskepticism
 * [[File:Necon.png]] Pro-NATO Membership
 * [[File:Intercult.png]] Interculturalism

Cultural Views

 * [[File:SocialProgressive.png]] Progressive Conservatism


 * [[File:Libeugen.png]] Liberal Eugenics


 * [[File:Civnat.png]] Civic Nationalism


 * [[File:Civlibert.png]] Civil Libertarianism


 * [[File:Gay.png]] Pro-LGBTQ+


 * [[File:FreeSpeak.png]] Freedom of Speech


 * [[File:Indiv.png]] Individualism


 * [[File:DvPermission.png]] Permissive Society


 * [[File:ProDrug.png]] Drug Legalization/Decriminalization


 * [[File:Utility.png]] Rule Utilitarianism


 * [[File:Humanismpix.png]] Humanism


 * [[File:Fem.png]] Feminism


 * [[File:Menslibnoears.png]] Men's Liberation


 * [[File:Pro-ChoiceRemade.png]] Pro-Choice


 * [[File:MLK_Jr.png]] Racial Egalitarianism


 * [[File:CapAnti_Clerical.png]] Anti-Clericalism

Philosophical Views

 * [[File:Moral.png]] Moralism
 * [[File:Consequentialism.png]] Consequentialism
 * [[File:Utility.png]] Utilitarianism
 * [[File:Indiv.png]] Individualism
 * [[File:Pragmat.png]] Pragmaticism
 * [[File:MoralUni.png]] Moral Universalism
 * [[File:Hedonism-cloud.png]] Hedonism
 * [[File:AntiSupernationalism.png]] Anti-Religion
 * [[File:Constructivist.png]] Constructivism
 * [[File:Pop.png]] Populism
 * [[File:Antinil.png]] Anti-Nihilism
 * [[File:Envi.png]] Naturalism

Metaphysics
My metaphysical view of the world could be described as materialistic determinism. Materialism being the concept that the universe is fundamentally matter, and nothing outside of the material universe exists, and determinism being the idea that all actions are of past results of previous actions. This would mean everything that has ever come to this point has been determined only by material factors, and nothing outside of natural laws has determined anything else in our universe. As, In a world that is only ran on natural laws, all actions would be naturally results of material factors. There is no freedom of choice when the past influences the future, meaning we only act as if we have free will.

Morality
I am a moralist, I believe its important to use morality to gauge in determining from what is right and wrong. My moral ethics come from consequentialism, an ethical theory stating that actions should be looked through the lens of the consequences of one's actions. However, pure consequentialism itself is flawed, as one's intentions should also be accounted for as well. This is were my morality branches off from consequentialism to utilitarianism, which states that actions should be judged based on how much harm and good they cause to other people (otherwise known as utility an action causes). This could describe my welfare ethics, as welfare has shown to create happy populations free from things like poverty, this moral outlook considers the collective good of society as a whole. Along with my support for services like Abortion, as I believe the government has no right to ban such services from this outlook, this would apply for things like pornography and other entertainment services. I believe these ethics have universal value, and are objective. Which is why I am a moral universalist as well, if something causes pain or suffering towards individuals, then it is morally wrong, but if it creates happiness, then it is morally good. Other liberal values such as democracy and equality under the law could also be considered universal values as well, since these have created the happiest populations with the most extensive civil liberties. This is where my internationalism comes from, I believe it's not only important we uphold these values in our country, but to uphold them in other countries around the world as well, since it is a universal theory. You may be asking "but how does your objective morality hold up in a universe that is fundamentally material and determined?", well, that isn't a contradictory view to hold universal values in a world only determined by material factors.

Epistemology
I am a social constructivist, it is important to look at societal factors and the upbringing of individuals for determining the behavior of said individuals, as "inherent traits" in people do not exist, this reasoning should be used when observing the behavior and nature of society at large to address the needs of people in said society. This view of society also coincides with my rationale outlook, itself from liberal thought that stems from the enlightenment, I believe that reason is the chief source of human knowledge, and is necessary for reasonable decision making.

Religious
If it wasn't obvious by my metaphysical view of the world, I am an atheist, more specifically, a gnostic atheist. I don't believe in any sort of gods, spirits, or anything that exists outside of the material universe, and I'm personally certain that there are no gods or any form spiritually that exist in a literal sense. I'm quite aware atheism doesn't immediately equal materialism, as atheism in of itself is just the disbelief in god and has no metaphysics, and to claim my metaphysical view of the world as correct would be foolish, because it most certainly isn't, and it's just how I see the world. But, that doesn't change anything about the "God" question for me personally, as I will not believe in such things that do not exist, or interest me regardless. Materialism has always been my view of the universe because my natural behavior as a person reflects materialism.

For the same reason, my religious journey is quite uninteresting, as I've never been a religious person or even a spiritual person, there's not a single time in my entire life I can ever recall anything outside the material universe existing. Both of my parents were Roman Catholics, although they weren't too religious and they never forced their beliefs onto me, the times they tried to get me to learn about Roman Catholicism failed because, as I stated, I was fundamentally uninterested in this topic and wasn't able to connect it with. Andm while I was not specifically an atheist, as I never rejected the idea of god existing past 2017, I also didn't believe in god in any literal sense, so I was more closer to apathetic agnosticism. I was basically a practical atheist, I lived my life like I didn't believe in god and was fundamentally uninterested in the topic, and that's how I lived my life up until 2017, so I might as well just have been an atheist my entire life. So, as you can imagine, it was not hard for me to come to the conclusion that I know all forms of spirituality are not real when it's something that has never been seriously challenged and I've had no reason to believe otherwise, so I've been a strong atheist ever since 2017. Do I believe people should be allowed to be religious if they choose to be? Well yes, obviously, that would be completely contradictory towards my individualism to tell people what they can and cannot believe in. At the same time, I find myself opposed to organized religion because of it historically oppressing individualism, so I'm more of an anti-clericalist.

Political
Modernism and Post-Modernism both make good points, but I can't fully subscribe to either of them. And, as such, I subscribe to the idea of Meta-Modernism. Believing that, the discoveries of both modernism and post-modernism are not ignorable, but the current post-modern attitude is not desirable. He holds that the narratives of modernism are social constructs in of themselves, but still believes that the values of said narratives hold value.

Ethics
I am a philosophical individualist, I believe in the worth of the individual over all forms of authority. Your hypothetical society doesn't know what's best for me, and to pretend that my hypothetical society would be best for you would be ignorant as well. I only know what's best for me, I want to enjoy myself and live life how I want to while I'm still personally alive, I don't want to live for others if I don't have to. With this, I don't like the modern day state of the left or the right for these reasons, as they take themselves too seriously and try to silence people's ideas who don't follow their specific views on their ideal utopic society. God has been substituted with politics in our postmodern society, and it quite frankly tires me. Just don't tell me how to live my life and I won't tell you how to live yours, and then we can get along.

I view shock humor as a good way to expose the fragileness that is both the modern day left and right for these reasons, things like ironic racism, sexism, anti-semitism, homophobia are welcomed as a way to expose the absurdity of both sides. This form of transgression could be considered a form of praxis.

This individualist view of the world also coincides with my moral hedonism, I believe it's important to live life pleasurably and do what personally makes me happy, this is largely because of my ADHD, hedonism has been one of the core pillars of my philosophy because of my impulsiveness as a person, it's always has been hard for me to focus on things that haven't been my own immediate material desires (which has also contributed to said materialistic view of the world) for this reason. Now, everything we do could be argued as being hedonistic, as we do it to increase pleasure and decrease pain, but I'm more specifically talking about sensual desires if that wasn't obvious, like eating junk food or sugary drinks. And while this is applicable, I'm even more specifically talking about sexual pleasure. I'll leave it at that because you can probably imagine what comes after that I don't need to go into any specific details, because this would get very explicit very quickly and that's not what this page is about, I don't have anything to naturally hide anyways (I'm actually serious I have very vanilla tastes, and I'm also not a closeted homosexual either, as what I watch would say otherwise).

Praxis
Being a populist, I see populism is a good way to achieve political power. So, I would incorporate populist heretic for political praxis. However, the creator of the page personally disagrees with populism to a certain extent, and many populist leaders in history have failed on their promises and actually just ended up serving the elite themselves, he views it as a good way to achieve his objectives. He combines these views with political realism seeing the best way to make change is through a pragmatic approach. As, while idealism is to an extent, necessary, you have to do things that go against your own ideas to inspire change. Even if it means compromising on your own ideals, it's better to have some of the change you wanted, compare to having nothing at all. And as such, harm reduction is very much necessary to achieve change.

Main Influences
Epicurus (341BC-270BC) Franklin D. Roosevelt (1882-1945) Theodore Roosevelt (1858-1919) Al Gore (1948) Marquis de Sade (1740-1814) John Locke (1632-1704) Albert Einstein (1879-1955) Mikhail Gorbachev (1931) Barack Obama (1961) Edward Snowden (1983) Julian Assange (1971) Ed Miliband (1969) Mette Frederiksen (1977) Huey Long (1893-1935) Andrés Manuel López Obrador (1953) Mizuho Fukushima (1955) Alexei Navalny (1976) Olof Palme (1927-1986) Sviatlana Tsikhanouskaya (1982) Roman Albertovich Abalin (1998) Joseph Stiglitz (1943) George Orwell (1903-1950) Martin Luther King Jr. (1929-1968) John Stuart Mill (1806-1873) Joseph Lancaster (?) John Maynard Keynes (1883-1946) Greg Guevara (1997) Bernie Sanders (1941) Ian Kochinski (1994) Petter Vallentyne (1952) Mustafa Kemal Ataturk (1881 - 1938) Jeremy Corbyn (1949) Elizabeth Warren (1949) Hillel Steiner (1942) Rick Falkvinge (1972) June Nicole Lapine (1991) Joshua Wong (1996) Agnes Chow (1996) Leung Kwok-hung (1956) Nathan Law (1993)

Personality + Stylistic Notes
He loves playing hoi4 and other paradox related strategy games, although he isn't too good at them. He dislikes most political extremism heavily, he deems these guys as edgy children who has just discovered politics. He's noted for being called "super annoying" in any server gets into, jokingly and unjokingly. You won't really see him hanging out with anyone outside of his friend group, and on the rare chance he does, he probably won't say much.

He will whine about his own state government and ramble on about he hates his own government whenever he gets the chance to do so. In-general, he just hates his own political situation. When anything goes against his individualism, he will be notably annoyed, seeing these guys as cringe.

History
It all started back in the summer of 2016, when he was browsing youtube and got recommend a video titled "Alternate future of the world" by a channel called Romanian Mapping, which featured aforementioned balls. This peaked his interest and quickly became one of his favorite interests, which served his my entry to the polandball fandom. Around in summer 2017 I got recommended a video by a content creator named "ISorrowProductions", which served as his entry to strategy games and Hearts of Iron 4, to which I bought back in November of 2017, and would revitalize my interest in the polandball fandom as those two are deeply connected (obviously).

I stopped watching mapping content back in early 2018 because the content was getting pretty stale, but I still liked Country balls and its fandom, but because of this sudden loss of interest in mapping content, I became less active in watching Polandball related content (although I still liked creators like ISP and Alex The Rambler). Around 2020, I got recommended a video called "The political compass rap" by a content creator known as "Jreg" (which many of you here most definitely know) by a friend in this private discord server that I no longer associate with, due the friend in question having been accused of doing so really bad things (nothing illegal, just being a general douche to others I associated with).

After I got recommended this video by my friend, this was the moment I got introduced into politics into any real capacity that actually interested me (although I never liked r/politicalcompassmemes because I saw it as a really politically illiterate subreddit). This same video and memes related to the political compass would serve as my entry into the polcompball fandom, I would quietly lurk around the subreddit back in early 2021. He created his new reddit account back in 2021 and started using it mid summer, however, he never used his old 2017 reddit account due to him post a lot of admittedly cringe stuff he never wants anyone to see.

He hasn't been active in any sort of discord related servers in this community due to him having lost most of his interest in discord after the events that happened, but he has been active in a couple offshoot communities related to political tests. However, he still lurks on discord with his friends which is how he is still in contact with them, but none of which are related to this community, but just politics and gaming in general. It was in similarly politically related servers that he had gotten into a lot of heated arguments with far-right groups and conservatives that caused him double down on his own progressive ideals. But, outside of these incidents, Ihas remained mostly drama free outside of political communities. And, has even befriended one of his old friends I used to talk to from 2019. So, I'm sure of my own political positions and will not change them any time soon.

Apolitical period
(2003 - 2012) Apolitical Childhood Period

The title says it all, I knew nothing about politics at this time because I was a child. None of us start political. So, there's nothing of noteworthy to be said here.'

/ (2012 - 2013) Apolitical Social Liberalism Period

The closest thing I had to any coherent political beliefs as a child was being against the current Republican nominee during the 2012 election, mostly influenced by my parents who were pretty liberal for their own views back in the day. Keep in mind, my grasp on politics was next to none. But I knew just a little bit, mostly from my parents. I was still apolitical as I lost all of my interest in politics after the election happened.

/ (Mid 2013) Monarchist Larp Period

I was larping as a Monarchist for the summer of 2013, I didn't legitimately believe in Monarchy as a form of government, I just thought it was funny.

/ (2013 - 2014) Homophobic Period

This part was the most socially conservative bit of my political journey, I was brainwashed by some group of people at school who I hung out with to hate Gay people. This was because homophobia was relevantly common back then.

// (2014 - 2016) Apolitical Progressive Conservative Social Liberalism Period

It was around this bit when I chilled out with some of my beliefs. As I was exceptionally childish and an easily influenceable person due to how little I knew at the time. Once I got out of that environment, I dropped my beliefs as I held no real hatred of LGBT individuals. So, the beliefs around this time were probably a progressive conservative social liberal. As, I still held some of my previous views from my parents. But, I was skeptical of the T part of the LGBT community. As, even my family was who was relevantly progressive about this issue was, which influenced my opinion. But, thought that abortion rights were cool and didn't see anything morally wrong with it.

Illiterate Political period
/ (Early 2016) Entering 2016

It was around the beginning of 2016 that I truly got the feel for politics, and began to understand more and more of our political climate as I grew up. With all of this, I still disliked mainstream news as it was too confusing for me to keep up with, so I still was relevantly confused about my politics for this period entering 2016, as I only grounded my political beliefs based on a few I had held previously without much insight to our political climate. But, because I didn't outright reject politics at this time, I would say I wasn't outright apolitical, as much as I just illiterate.

/ (Mid 2016) The 2016 Presidential Election, Part 1

The 2016 President election is were it all started. It was around when the election was beginning I looked into both of main nominees of Trump and Hillary, which I disliked both of them, seeing them as twofaced morons that were unlikable. Especially the racist things trump said about Latinos which my father told me about, this caused me to look into third party candidates.

// (2016 - 2017) The 2016 Presidential Election, Part 2

With my exploration of the political climate, I found myself adopting more views and agreeing with people like Bernie and other left-wing democrats, as I saw those candidates as likable compared to the previous candidates I encountered. With this, I would watch videos related to such topics. While I wasn't exactly socially conservative, I did get the wrong idea about some things entering into politics by watching the stereotypical "anti-sjw" videos due to not having the best grasp of the political climate at the time, I did watch a couple and it influenced my opinions on things like feminism. And, due to the heavy presence of "anti-sjw" topics related to some of these videos endorsing these candidates, it would further warp my views on such topics like feminism. This is were my political journey truly began.

Early Modern Period
///////(2017-2019) "Anti-SJW" Period

This part was just outright confusing looking back on it, my beliefs were understandability shaped by some of the videos I watched and some video games I played. And while I had no real stance on religion at the time, and wasn't even religious, I still had a general dislike of religious authority due to having never had a single good experience with it, this would cumulate whenever I watched some videos of people making fun of religious conservatives and agreeing with a lot of what these videos had to say, and affirming my own philosophical religious belief about materialism. However, I never watched any of the atheist skeptic community stuff on youtube, as I never had any interest in religion or religious debates itself. My economic beliefs started to change as well to fit the economic beliefs of the candidates I looked up to. This shift happened for a couple of reasons: me discovering strategy games, exploring different political candidates as previously mentioned, and watching youtube videos related to such topics. I became more economically left. And, while I had no stance on globalization at the time, due to the some of the populist rhetoric I had encountered from these videos I watched, I disliked globalism. However, I didn't know a lot about foreign policy, so I really couldn't call myself a nationalist. Along with having a bad idea of what feminism was, I thought it was just a bunch of men-hating social justice warriors whining about some imaginary patriarchy that didn't exist, along with trans people not being real. (However, I was not some Manosphere type person which is often associated with anti-feminism, as I didn't believe in any of that nonsense) But, I still supported some feminist ideas like abortion rights. So, my overall beliefs weren't conservative per-say, so much as they just represented the counter-culture present within this time period, and were just ultimately ill-informed due to not being knowledgeable about these things at the time. I was just an edgy degenerate who was in an environment were shock humor was normal and we made fun of each other even though most of us were (especially me) massive degenerates behind the scenes, that's cringe culture for you, we were all hypocritical children bullying people for their own passions and hobbies while hiding our own hobbies that we would be made fun for. I was a typical counter-culture atheist around this time.

/ (2019 - 2021) Becoming More Progressive Period

It was around of early 2019 that I came the realization that I had more agreement with progressive talking points more than I did with conservative talking points, and that some of the anti-sjw beliefs I held really didn't fit my cultural views. With this, I became more socially progressive and began dropping a lot of my ill-informed views that I had picked up. Along with becoming less critical of feminism and trans people. I began engaging with more progressive circles in politics. Which, is what I desperately needed around this time. As, my social beliefs were contradictory and didn't truly reflect what I thought. However, I still disliked the more SJW bits of progressivism, like pride culture and political correctness, but I stopped viewing it in the same lens I did last time. Because, when I was in these spheres of political discussion, it seriously made me reflect on my previous views and how cringeworthy these takes were.

Modern Period
// (Mid 2021 - 2022) Adopting Populism

I started to adopt more left-wing populist stances combined with my social democratic views on economics, along with becoming more progressive and supporting things like multiculturalism. However, I hadn't truly embraced left-wing populist, but I was slowly warming up to it, so I became more consistent with this view over time.

///// (Mid 2022) Adopting Georgism

It was around sometime during July that I read up on Georgism after having it recommended to me as a political ideology by someone on discord, as there was a couple of people with the same ideology as me who held this view of land. So, I gave it a look, and I found a lot of agreeability within Georgism and its view on land. So, after a couple of days day, I adopted Social Georgism into my political belief set. It was also around this time I readopted left-wing nationalism into my ideology as well.

]///// (Late 2022) Solidating My Beliefs

Now, this is were I basically stand. I am a left-wing populist social democrat. It was also around the time of summer of when I started to fully embrace my original roots. I also looked into Georgism around this time as well, and became skeptical of land speculation all together. With this, I stopped believing in landlords, and thought that a land value tax is the best way to tax land. I still maintain my culturally liberal beliefs. However, I disowned some things progressives advocated for like identity politics and would slowly become more and more critical of modern day progressivism.

///// (Late 2022 and onwards) Disillusionment with Progressivism

It was about this time I realized both progressives and conservatives are full of bullshit in their own regards. I became less progressive and in-general as I just became fed up with both sides of the political debate, seeing them both as retarded. My stances on culture now just more or less represent individualism, but they do still lean leftwards because of my past progressive influences that I do actually agree with. I've gone through so many rabbit holes during this time period, and I just ended up getting fed up with everything I went down, so I'm back to were I was basically before 2021. Consider this a 180 in my own political adventure. I started to embrace more edgy shock value humor during my school years of 2017-2021 and I am not afraid to speak my mind against both sides, as both sides are very much deserving of criticism.

Overview
So, to reflect on my entire political journey, I started off as apolitical like anyone else, then was an apolitical modern liberal when I supported democratic candidate Barrack Obama, but quickly became apolitical. Had a few hiccups during my apolitical phase, but got back to my original roots, then fell down a rabbit hole of left-wing anti-sjw videos, became a Bernie Sanders supporter in the process of all of this, and slowly got out of that "anti-sjw" phase. This followed up with me gradually accepting more progressive ideals while not buying into the preachy woke idpol stuff, but then completely forgoing of everything I had picked up from this point period by going into political rabbit wholes that contradicted my own beliefs, causing them to shift backwards, then becoming a full on woke Baizuo and a neoliberal puppet after consuming a bunch of postmodernist junk just because I hated conservatism. After I realized these beliefs were stupid, I started to pull back to my original populist social democratic roots, while still being almost fanatical about LGBT rights and other progressive policies. I got more nationalistic over time as well, and less progressive too. Now I've gone through my post-baizuo SJW phase, and I have adopted actually sensible social policies that aren't out of a response towards having a bad time with conservatives, but were still culturally liberal, and these beliefs now are likely not to change into the future.

My Political Journey
> >  >  >

Dad
Social Liberalism
 * [[File:Progress.png]] Progressivism
 * [[File:Socdem.png]] Social Democracy
 * [[File:Civlibert.png]] Civil Libertarianism
 * [[File:Humanismpix.png]] Humanism

Mom
Liberal Conservatism
 * [[File:Fiscon.png]] Fiscal Conservatism
 * [[File:Protect.png]] Protectionism
 * [[File:Modnat.png]] Patriotism

Sister
Social Libertarianism
 * [[File:Progress.png]] Progressivism
 * [[File:Bhl.png]] Bleeding-Heart Libertarianism
 * [[File:Raddem.png]] Radical Democracy

Granddad
Libertarian Conservatism
 * [[File:Xbert.png]] Christian Libertarianism
 * [[File:Honk.png]] Satirism

Grandma
Apoliticism
 * [[File:Moder.png]] Moderatism

Closeted Discord Friend
Satirism
 * [[File:Liberty.png]] Free Speech Absolutism
 * [[File:Blacknat.png]] Black Nationalism
 * [[File:Soccap.png]] Social Capitalism
 * [[File:Modprog.png]] Moderate Progressivism

Alexander
Liberalism
 * [[File:3way.png]] Third Way
 * [[File:Antifa.png]] Anti-Fascism
 * [[File:Glib.png]] Green Liberalism

Nouh
Democratic Socialism
 * [[File:Libsoc.png]] Libertarian Socialism
 * [[File:Leftpop-0.png]] Left-Wing Populism
 * [[File:Ecosoc.png]] Eco-Socialism
 * [[File:Nordmodel.png]] Nordic Model

Mark
Moderatism
 * [[File:Neoliberal-icon.png]] Neoliberalism
 * [[File:Radcent.png]] Radical Centrism
 * [[File:European_Federalism.png]] European Federalism

Political Compass Test


Economic Leftism / Economic Rightism (x): -2.00 Social Authoritarian / Social Libertarian (y): -5.44

Test Result: Libertarian Unity

SapplyValues


Equality / Markets (x): -2 Security / Freedom (y): -1.67 Progress/ Tradition (z): 4.56

Test Result: Center-Left

SHODANSapplyValues


Equality / Markets (x): -1 Security / Freedom (y): -1.7 Progress/ Tradition (z): 11.5

Test Result: Center-Left

8Values
Equality 66.0% / 33.0% Markets (Social)

Nationalism 33.9% / 66.1% Globalism (Peaceful)

Liberty 68.0% / 32.0% Authority (Liberal)

Tradition 28.0% / 72.0% Progress (Progressive)

Ideology: Social Democracy

NewValues
Equality 62.6% / 37.4% Markets (Social)

Nationalism 27.4% / 72.6% Globalism (Globalist)

Liberty 57.1% / 42.9% Authority (Moderate)

Tradition 22.9% / 77.1% Progress (Very Progressive)

Ideology: Social Democracy

Statecraft Compass
Democracy 75.0% / 25.0% Autocracy

Liberty 66.0% / 34.0% Security

Equality 74.0% / 26.0% Competition

82.0% Progress / 18.0% Tradition

Closest Ideology: Leftism

Furthest Ideology: Fascism

9Axes (Short Version)
Federalism 60% / 40% Unitarism (Moderate Federal)

Democracy 70% / 30% Authority (Democratic)

Globalism 75% / 25% Isolationism (Globalist)

Militarism 25% / 75% Pacifism (Pacifist)

Assimilationist 40% / 60% Multiculturalist (Moderate Multiculturalist)

Security 35% / 65% Liberty (Moderate Freedom)

Equality 65% / 35% Markets (Moderate Equality)

Secular 100% / 0% Religious (Fanatic Secular)

Progress 75% / 25% Tradition (Progressive)

Ideology: Social Democracy

9Axes (Long Version)
Federalism 70% / 30% Unitarism (Federal)

Democracy 70% / 30% Authority (Democratic)

Globalism 65% / 35% Isolationism (Moderate Globalist)

Militarism 25% / 75% Pacifism (Pacifist)

Assimilationist 35% / 65% Multiculturalist (Moderate Multiculturalist)

Security 35% / 65% Liberty (Moderate Freedom)

Equality 64% / 36% Markets (Moderate Equality)

Secular 80% / 20% Religious (Extreme Secular)

Progress 68% / 32% Tradition (Moderate Progressive)

Ideology: Social Libertarianism

12Axes
Federalism 61.0% / 39.0% Unitarism (Federal)

Democracy 71.5% / 29.5% Authority (Representative Democracy)

Security 36.0% / 64.0% Liberty (Liberal)

Internationalism 60.0% / 30.0% Nationalism (Co-operation)

Militarism 25.0% / 75.0% Pacifism (Non-Aggressive)

Assimilationism 35.0% / 65.0% Multiculturalist (Polyculturalist)

Collectivize 50.0% / 50.0% Privatize (Mixed Economy)

Planned 70.0% / 30.0% Laissez-Faire (Regulationism)

Protectionism 41.5% / 58.5% Globalism (Moderate)

Irreligious 82.0% / 18.0% Religious (Atheist)

Progress 75.0% / 25.0% Tradition (Progressive)

Technology 75.0% / 25.0% Bio-conservative (Technological)

Ideology: Social Liberalism

AmericanValues
Conservatism 28.3% / 71.3% Liberalism (Liberal)

Cooperation 68.0% / 32.0% Individualism (Collectivist)

Globalism 67.1% / 32.9% Isolationism (Globalist)

Freedom 55.6% / 44.4% Security (Moderate)

Doctrinial 63.8% / 36.2% Textual (Doctrinal)

Centralism 50.0% / 50.0% State's Rights (Balanced)

Ideology: Progressive Democrat

LeftValues
Revolution 5.9% / 94.1% Reform (Extremely Reformist)

Scientific 35.9% / 64.1% Utopian (Utopian)

Central 46.7% / 53.3% Decentral (Neutral)

International 75.0% / 25.0% National (Internationalist)

Party 92.3% / 7.7% Union (Extremely Partisan)

Production 38.9% / 61.1% Ecology (Ecological)

Conservative 35.9% / 64.1% Progressive (Progressive)

Ideology: Social Democracy

CapValues
Free Market 41.7% / 58.3% Corporatism (Regulationism)

Futurism 70.8% / 29.2% Conservatism (Progressivism)

Autocracy 36.5% / 63.5% Democracy (Representativism)

Authoritarian 44.4% / 55.6% Libertarian (Libertarianism)

Environment 61.1% / 38.9% Productivism (Sustainability)

Land Rights 40.0% / 60.0% Georgism (Land Value Tax)

Anti-Clerical 80.3% / 19.7% Religious (Atheism)

Globalism 70.8% / 29.2% Nationalism (Internationalism)

Interventionism 40.0% / 60.0% Isolationism (Non-Interventionist)

Accerlation 66.7% / 33.3% Deceleration (Research)

Elitism 29.2% / 70.8% Populism (Popular)

Disunity 75.0% / 25.0% Unity (Enemies)

Ideology: Social Meritocracy

LiberationValues
Moderate 70.9% / 29.1% Radical (Labourism)

Left-Unity 51.9% / 48.1% Lib-Unity (Generalist)

Centralized 50.0% / 50.0% Decentralized (Balanced)

Localist 31.5% / 68.5% Globalist (Internationalist)

Traditionalist 23.7% / 76.3% Progressive (Very Progressive)

Reform 83.3% / 16.7% Revolution (Reformism)

Markets 68.8% / 31.2% Planning (Slightly Unregulated)

Ideology: Social Democracy

EconValues
Equity 62.5% / Competition 37.5% (Redistributed)

Horizontal 60.9% / Hierarchy 39.1% (Levelled)

Demand 60.9% / Regulation 39.1% (Permissive)

Centralized 50.0% / Local 50.0% (Neutral)

Automation 56.3% / Employment 43.7% (Industrialized)

Commons 73.4% / Rent 26.6% (Anti-Rent)

Birth Right 22.9% / Merit 78.1% (Opportunity)

Unionized 75.0% / Divided 25.0% (Pro-Union)

Closest Match: Social Democracy

EconValues (Updated)
Leveled 65.0% / Competition 35.0%

Horizontal 65.0% / Hierarchy 35.0%

Planning 65.0% / 35.0% Markets

Central 75.0% / Local 25.0%

Automated 60.0% / Employed 40.0%

National 55.0% / 45.0% Global

Closest Match: Social Corporatism

Next Matches: Yellow Socialism,  Social Democracy

Worst Matches: Anarcho-Capitalism,  Left-Rothbardianism,  Crypto-Anarchism

Top 10 Closest Matches: WIP

Top 10 Furthest Matches: WIP

AuthValues
Oligarchy 95.5% / Autocracy 4.5%  (Bureaucracy)

Capitalist 42.9% / Socialist 57.1% (Mixed Economy)

Elitism 10.0% / Populism 90.0% (Populism)

Prevention 35.7% / Deterrence 64.3% (Discouragement)

Diverse 87.5% / Uniform 12.5% (Polyculturalist)

Irreligion 80.0% / Theocracy 20.0% (Irreligion)

Best Suited 75.0% / Hereditary 25.0% (Meritocracy)

Auth Disunity 83.3% / 16.7% Auth-Unity (Disunity)

Closest Match: Paternalistic Conservatism

Right Values
Reform 72.2% / 27.8% Conserve (Reformist)

Intervention 65.0% / 35.0% Laisse-Faire (Regulationist)

Authority 35.0% / 65.0% Constitution (Democratic)

Particular 75.0% / 25.0% Universal (Non-Aggressive)

Theocratic 0.0% / 100.0% Separation (Secularism)

Accelerate 70.0% / 30.0% Decelerate (Productivism)

Assimilation 42.5% / 57.5% Multicultural (Neutral)

Ideology: Geolibertarianism

ConservaValues
Moderate 88.8% / 11.2% Radical (Center-Conservative)

Socialist 61.3% / 38.7% Capitalist (Social Democracy)

Authoritarian 43.3% / 56.7% Libertarian (Balanced)

Nationalist 38.5% / 61.5% Globalist (Diplomatic)

Conventionalist 81.5% / 19.5% Conspiratorialist (Conventionalist)

Ideology: Third Way

8Dreams
Altruity 57.5% / 42.5% Avarice (Realist)

Dominant 33.0% / 67.0% Insular (Ideological Pacificist)

Self 72.8% / 27.2% Totality (Individualist)

Stalwart 10.7% / 89.3% Hedonic (Hedonist)

Ideology: Social Kakistocracy

12Wackies
Altruity 54.7% / 45.3% Avarice (Realist)

Cosmocracy 81.6% / 18.4% Incognitism (One-World Government)

Self 66.1% / 33.9% Totality (Individualist)

Morality 54.7% / 45.3% Immorality (Average Joe)

Chaotic 65.0% / 35.0% Systematic (Self Isolationism)

Regressive 50.0% / 50.0% Replacement (Modern Technology)

Egalitarian 95.3% / 4.7% Supremacist (Post-Race)

Nihilism 116.2% / -16.2% Esoteric (Post-Religion)

Universalism 70.6% / 29.4% Urbanism (Continent)

Ochlocracy 70.0% / 30.0% Aristocracy (Elections)

Panculturalism 67.9% / 32.1% Monoculturalism (Cultural Blindness)

Destructionism -9.2% / 109.2% Irenic (Post-Aggressivism)

DozenValues
Equality 55.6% / 44.4% Property (Collective)

Coordination 67.4% / 32.6% Commerce (Regulated)

Dominion 43.1% / 56.9% Anarchy (Dispersed)

Permisison 79.2% / 20.8% Restriction (Tolerant)

Inclusivity 58.3% / 41.7% Supremacy (Respectful)

Heritage 36.1% / 63.9% Novelty (Neoteric)

Ideology: Left-Wing Populism

Next Matches: Social Democracy,

Worst Matches: Esoteric Fascism,  Jihadism,  Pol Potism

Top 10 Closest Matches:

WIP

Top 10 Furthest Matches:

WIP

6Foundations
Care - [23/30] 76.7%

Fairness - [23/30] 76.7%

Loyalty - [9/30] 30.0%

Authority - [16/30] 53.3%

Sanctity - [12/30] 30.0%

Liberty - [18/30] 60.0%

Estimated Ideology: Social Democracy

PolcompballValues
Sincerity 65.0% / Irony 35.0% (Rational)

Jannyphobe 61.4% / Jannyphile 38.6% (Populist)

Veteran 35.4% / Newbie 64.6% (Apprentice)

Wholesome 71.4% / Edgy 28.6% (Goodwilling)

Horny 87.5% / Anti Horny 13.5% (Decadent)

Active 34.5% / Lurker 65.5% (Sometimes)

Standard 50.0% / Wacky 50.0% (Political)

Boring 33.3% / Schizo 66.7% (Neurotic)

Liked 66.1% / Disliked 33.9% (Appreciated)

Discriminatory 23.4% / Inclusive 76.6% (Accepting)

Behaving 55.8% / Misbehaving 44.2% (Behaved)

DiscriminatoryValues
White 50.0% / Black 50.0% (Racial Egalitarianism)

Matriarchy 60.0% / Patriarchy 40.0% (Feminism)

Jeunism 40.0% / Adultism 60.0% (Moderate Adultism)

Hetero 40.0% / Homo 60.0% (Sexual Orientation Equality)

Cis 40.0% / Trans 60.0% (Transgender Equality)

Malthusocracy 60.0% / Lipostrocracy 40.0% (Body Type Equality)

CulturalValues Test
Monoethnic 13.1% / 86.9% Multiethnic (Ethnic Abolitionist)

Monocultural 31.7% / 68.3% Multicultural (Slightly Multicultural)

Favoritism 4.6% / 95.4% Equality (Absolute Equality)

Tolerance 79.8% / 20.2% Separation (Tolerant)

Pro-LGBT 78.7 / 21.3 Anti-LGBT (Pro-LGBT)

Nation 34.5% / 65.5 International (Continental)

Religion 0.0% / 100.0% Secular (French Secularism)

Essentialism 1.1% / 98.9% Constructivism (Extremely Constructivist)

Closest Match: Post-Modernism

Vanguard Values
Demagogue 87.5% / 12.5% Technocrat (Party)

Planned 14.6% / 84.4% Market (Market)

One Country 25.0% / 75.0% Global (International)

Military 9.4% / 90.6% Peace (Peace)

Proletarian 71.9% / 28.1% Peasant (Proletarian)

Uniform 37.5% / 62.5% Tolerant (Mixed)

Traditional 15.6% / 84.4% Neoteric (Progressive)

Populist 96.9% / 4.1% Elitist (Everyman)

Closest Match: Democratic Socialism

Religious Values
Pro-Catholic 6.2% / 93.8 Anti-Catholic (Fanatically Anti-Catholic)

Pro-Protestant 14.1% / 85.9% Anti-Protestant (Extremely Anti-Protestant)

Pro-Orthodox 12.7% / 87.3% Anti-Orthodox (Extremely Anti-Orthodox)

Philo-Semitic 25.9% / 74.1% Anti-Semitic (Anti-Semitic) (Criticism of Judaism =/= Anti-Semitism btw)

Islamophilic 15.1% / 84.9% Islamophobic (Extremely Islamophobic)

Pro-Buddhist 25.7% / 74.4% Anti-Buddhist (Anti-Buddhist)

Pro-Hindu 25.7% / 74.4% Anti-Hindu (Anti-Hindu)

Pro-Pagan 25.7% / 74.3% Anti-Pagan (Anti-Pagan)

Satanic 46.0% / 54.0% Divine (Neutral)

Religious 8.5% / 91.5% Atheistic (Fanatically Atheistic)

Closest Match: Secular Atheist

Dichotomy Philosophy
Materialism 75.0% / 25.0% Spiritualism

Egoism 66.7% / 33.3% Altruism

Idealism 32.0% / 68.0% Pragmatism

Hedonism 76.8% / 24.2% Asceticism

Nihilism 44.2% / 55.8% Moralism

Rationalism 72.4% / 27.6% Romanticism

Skepticism 87.5% / 12.5% Absolutism

Closeted Match:,  Objectivism,

AltValues
Individual 85.0% / 15.0% Collective (Atomized)

Market 66.7% / 33.3% Planned (Regulated)

Essentialism 0.0% / 100.0% Constructivism Constructivist

Pragmatic 79.2% / 21.8% Idealist (Utilitarian)

Universal 84.4% / 16.6% Particular (Universal)

Ecological 37.5% / 62.5% Industrial (Balanced)

Politicized 54.2% / 45.8% Apolitical (Balanced)

Religious 0.0% / 100.0% Secular (Atheist)

Futuristic 66.7% / 33.3% Historical (Futuristic)

IdeoShapes
Civil Axis: Liberal

Economic Axis: Protectionist

Societal Axis: Progressive

Diplomatic Axis:

Closest matching ideologies: Liberalism,   Social Democracy,  Left-Wing Populism,  Progressivism

Complementarily opposed: Neoconservatism,  Right-Wing Populism,  Conservatism

Furthest matches: Nazism,  Theocracy,  Anarcho-Capitalism

Religious Typology Quiz
Solidly Secular

Political Typology Quiz
Progressive Left/ Establishment Liberal

Dichotomy Political Philosophy
Overall Left 74.8% / 25.2% Overall Right

Naturalist 100.0% / 0.0% Transcendental

Deconstructive 70.9% / 29.1% Traditional

Equality 55.9% / 44.1% Hierarchy

Liberation 73.1% / 26.9% Control

Closeted Match: Critical Thinker,  Socialist

Dichotomy Economic Test
Protectionism 34.1% / 65.9% Free Trade

Inter-Dependence 63.0% / 37.0% Autarky

Libertarianism 50.6% / 49.4% Statism

Globalisation 38.9% / 61.1% Nationalisation

Commercial 70.7% / 29.3% Subsistence

Adhocracy 35.9% / 64.1% Bureaucracy

Flat Tax 26.1% / 73.9% Progressive Tax

CN Values
Equality 63% / 37% Market (Equality Bias)

Freedom 67% / 33% Authority (Freedom Bias)

Progress 80% / 20% Tradition (Progress)

Ecology 55% / 45% Production (Neutral)

Closeted Match: Social Democracy

Follow Ups: Industrial Party,  Feminism,  Complete Westernization,  Pirate Party

Sex Values
Masculine 0.0% / 100.0% Feminine (Feminine)

Hyper 78.1% / Hypo 21.9% (High)

Dominant 58.3% / 41.7% Submissive (Switch)

Deviant 31.3% / 68.7% Pure (Vanilla)

Affection 12.5% / 87.5% Hedonism (Hedonist)

Center For a Stateless Society
Economic Leftist 65.0% / 35.0% Economic Rightist

Social Liberal 89.0% / 11.0% Social Conservative

Civil Libertarian 83.0% / 17.0% Civil Authoritarian

Antistatist 52.0% / 48.0% Statist

Anti-Militarist 81.0% / 19.0% Militarist

The Political Sextant Quiz
Top Ideologies:

Civic Nationalism 100%

Kemalism 100%

Social Democracy 100%

Three Principles of the People 100%

Third Way 100%

Worst Ideologies:

Anarcho-Primitivism -50%

Classical Marxism -50%

De Leonism -50%

Mutualism -50%

Agorism -60%

Anarcha-Feminism -50%

Marxism-Leninism -67%

National Anarchism -50%

Synthesis Anarchism -50%

American Political Bloc Quiz
Progressive - 189

Green - 182

Mainstream Democrat - 156

Libertarian - 131

Acela Centrist - 120

Neoconservative - 90

Establishment Conservative - 68

Trumpist - 68

Political Personality Quiz
Utopian Virtuoso

Policy Priorities:


 * [[File:Prog.png]] Social Equality - 95%


 * [[File:Socdem.png]] Social Healthcare - 95%


 * [[File:Technocracy.png]] Education Reform - 90%


 * [[File:Envi.png]] Environmental Health - 85%


 * [[File:World.png]] Amicable Global Relations - 85%


 * [[File:Multicult.png]] Immigration Rights - 80%


 * [[File:Sec.png]] Law and Regulation - 60%


 * [[File:Cap.png]] Wealth Maximization - 25%


 * [[File:ChristNat.png]] Religious Fundamentals - 20%

Party Alignment:


 * [[File:Demcr.png]] Democratic Ticket - 95%


 * [[File:RepubUS.png]] Republican Ticket - 3%


 * [[File:Libertarian.png]] Libertarian Ticket - 13%


 * [[File:GreensUS.png]] Green Party Ticket - 33%

= My beliefs =

[[File:Dem.png]] Overview [[File:Dem.png]]
Mattism is a democratic ideology. Believing that, democracy has shown itself to be the least worst system, at least compared to all other forms tried. And, that countries without democracy are bound to fail compared to those with democratic institutions. Along with favoring reforms to our current system to make it more democratic and have an electorial system that is inclusive to more parties, and to fight corruption. He supports a constitutional  semi-presidential  federal  republic as his form of governmental system. Along with immigrant rights,  interculturalism,  secularism, ,  e-democracy, and  the scaling back of the surveillance state.

[[File:Liberal_Democracy.png]] Liberal Democracy [[File:Liberal_Democracy.png]]
Mattism prefers a government that is built for the common good for the people, and thus, a a republic. Specifically, a liberal democracy. However, he wants to give the population more say in government, and thinks introducing policies that bring direct democracy into the government are a good idea. And, is supportive of a semi-direct democracy. Seeing it as the ultimate compromise between either a representative democracy, and a  direct democracy. So, Representatives should be largely responsible for governance, while citizens can have more autonomy through popular initiatives and referendums, ect. Along with this, he recongizes the importance of evidence based policies, seeing the rise of anti-intellectualism in our current political system to suit one's ideological needs as having disastrous effects for our current political climate, he believes that public policy should be influenced by  scientific evidence.

However, while supporting republicanism, he is willing to tolerate ceremonial monarchs in countries were it exists. like in the Nordic Countries, as those can be important to define a country's culture, even if he doesn't personally support a monarchy, he wouldn't care if a country had or didn't have one in these instances, but wouldn't support implementing it in other countries that are already fully functioning republics.

With all of this, he realizes that a country needs to reach a level of economic development before democracy can be properly implimented in the country. So, in places were this would be the case, he would support social authoritarianism as a transitionary stage to develop the economic development necessary so said democracy can be properly built in said country. Although, oligarchical states are cringe and should be avoided, he supports  technocratic rule in these cases, this would be rarely used though, keep in mind.

[[File:Semiprez.png]] Semi-Presidential System [[File:Semiprez.png]]
Mattism takes issues with the current presidential system we currently have, believing that this system gives too much power to one person compared to a  parliamentary system. He would seek to combine elements from both of these governmental systems to create a semi-presidential system, were a  president and a  separate parliamentary system co-exist in the government.

[[File:Constlib2.png]] Constitutionalism [[File:Constlib2.png]]
Mattism supports the creation of a constitution that establishes a separation of powers in our government and protects our civil liberties. The constitution will be interpreted as a living document and will be subject to change to fit the times. In this regard, he takes issue with the current constitution in our government, because it was written during a time that has long sense passed. He would write a new constitution to fit the modern day politics of the country.

[[File:Merit.png]] Civil Service Reform [[File:Merit.png]]
Mattism seeks to abolish the electoral college, seeing it as nothing more than an relic of the past that is barely functioning the modern day, and is disproportionately effecting third parties ability to compete, contributing to the two party dictatorship and the further elitism within these parties. With the ever increasing amount of people being disillusioned by our system, and not identifying with either democrats or republicans, he views this as a system that has to go. His first reform would to replace the electoral college vote with the popular vote. His other reforms would be to abolish the senate, seeing it as nothing more than upholding the elitism within the government, and preventing a lot of necessary reform. Along with a ban on corporate lobbying and gerrymandering. These reforms I would propose would, along with my other reforms, strengthen American democracy, prevent cronyism in our government, and give more people say in the government. As I believe our government shouldn't be for sale by massive corporations, it should be for the people, and make our overall system more meritocratic.

[[File:E-Democracy.png]] Electronic Voting [[File:E-Democracy.png]]
Mattism believes we need to push forwards technology that allow us to vote via things like, a phone, computer, ect. He is a supporter of an electronic democracy in this regard. However, realizing how vulnerable these methods are to outside influence, he opposes implementing these policies until we have the technology necessary to go through with it, but overall, he is supportive of the development of said technology. Voting via other methods will still be available and not be phased out. However, these policies would only be done on a local level, with things like national elections having to be done in-person or by mail.

[[File:Anti-Corrupt.png]] Whistle Blowers [[File:Anti-Corrupt.png]]
Mattism believes that people who expose government corruption shouldn't have to fear persecution, as the government and its institutions have a right to be inclusive and transparent with the population that is being governed. And, that any functioning democracy should work on ridding itself of corrupt officials in office.

[[File:Fed.png]] Federalism [[File:Fed.png]]
In terms of how the bureaucracy is administered, Mattism prefers local governance compared to a  unitary government, mainly due to how ineffective a unitary government would preform in the United States due to its size. He would recommend unitary governance is countries that are smaller and more homogeneous, but federalism in larger and more diverse countries. However, states governments have to abide by the national laws, and the constitution.

[[File:DefDem.png]] Defensive Democracy [[File:DefDem.png]]
Mattism believes the government should actively protect its institutions from those who wish to do them harm, as we cannot give them the freedom to tear down our democracy. This would function like a defensive democracy. If your party actively poses a threat to democracy, it shouldn't be included in government. Believing that freedom of assembly and speech has its limits, and where they use their voices to silence the voices of other people is enough to warrant this.

[[File:Intercult.png]] Interculturalism [[File:Intercult.png]]
Mattism supports interculturalism as an alternative to  multiculturalism or  monoculturalism. The former being a mishmash of cultures that will erase our national identity and undermine the social cohesion needed for a social democratic state, while the latter being too exclusionary to foreigners and causing people to not be accepting of people's differences. So, it allows for diversity at the local level, while still allowing for a shared sense of national identity. The type of intercultural model he supports is the  model, different cultures in society should stress the similarities instead of the differences between each group to ensure societal stability. This allows for each culture within society to have common values between each culture that hold them together, while all of them having the national identity as one unifying thing between all the cultures in society, thus, still maintaining a diverse local culture.

[[File:Civnat.png]] Immigration [[File:Civnat.png]]
Mattism's stance on immigration largely depends on the context of the country. But, in the United States, he takes a pro-immigration stance, and is in favor of liberalizing immigration, as immigrants help contribute to the labor force that is slowly shrinking each decade as America's population continues to age, while the birth rate declines. So, it's better to use this wave of mass immigration to our benefit. With addition to this, he supports giving illegal immigrants a legal pathway to citizenship. However, there will be a wait list where the immigrants have to be assimilated values before they can access any of the government programs, such as the welfare state. He also thinks it helps contribute to maintaining the social democratic state, as seen in the  Nordic countries. However, with less racism. Along with it being less destructive to the progressive movement, as cultures that do not tolerate our values will not peacefully coexist with us or a progressive culture.

In terms of how refugees will be handled, while he does support raising the cap of refugees that are taken in, he also realizes that some of the refugees we take in come from cultures that have arisen in societies that have backwards ways of thinking and hold anti-progressive and anti-western views. So, from war torn places like Syria, we should be prioritizing who is going to benefit our country most and tightly vet them, but, outside of that, they can come into our country so long as they don't cause trouble for anyone else in society. And, is against racism or  xenophobia that can be seen in many places like Europe after the immigrant crisis happened. He opposes the implementation of surveillance services and complete bans on immigration, as those are just purely motivated by the latter.

[[File:Secular.png]] Secularism [[File:Secular.png]]
Mattism is against any religious organization playing a role in government, or the government subsidizing religious organizations through a tax exempt status. Which is why he seeks the complete separation of church and state. There will be a strong wall between church and state institutions, religion will be separated from things like schools and most religious references will be removed from our government. But, things like religious festivals and public holidays are fine, and the government will recognize the most practiced ones as the public holidays for the country. Anyone has the right to express any belief they want as long as they aren't harming others and no forms of public expression regarding religion will be banned.

He's opposed to forced secularism, or  religious governance. As well, he thinks that people who deny basic science based on their religious beliefs are very cringe, and only hold society back. And, in this regard, he holds distrust of Islam, seeing as many third-world Islamic countries are riddled with  reactionaries  who use religion as a mean to further sentiment their rule, and how even  moderate Islam has been used to in the same vain as well. Not to say this doesn't apply to other religions, but, Islam in the modern day holds more relevancy. However, this is not to say he's against the people who practice Islam, they should be allowed to follow their beliefs so long as they aren't harming other people.

He firmly sides with the, as his own personal beliefs are aligned with this group, and will support them against the influence of the  religious right. He sees their waning cultural influence as a good thing, as this group has been one of the greatest forces against progressive policies, along with just never having had a single good experience with this group of people on a personal level.

[[File:Civilib.png]] Civic Liberalism [[File:Civilib.png]]
Mattism is pro-privacy, with his government operating under the civic ideas of  classical liberalism. He's against mass survillence that is present within our current society, believing that the expansion of the surveillance state in the United States hasn't been for the best interest of the people, but for the government to further its control over the general populace. He would enact reforms that weaken the surveillance state so it isn't so invasive into people's daily lives. This would include revoking the patriot act, and getting rid of other unneeded spying programs. As, he believes the government should be big enough to protect the people from harm and keep them safe, but should also should respect the personal privacy of daily citizens lives. Because, he's not opposed to things like CCTV cameras in public places, as those can be useful for deterring things like  crime. But, the further expansion of these services to include wiretapping into people who aren't even greenlit for investigations and personal things like phone calls leads to the ever increasing authoritarianism in Western states, and is a severe breach of privacy. The government should be there for the people when it is legitimately needed, and must be centralized enough to provide services for the country and  play a role in directing the economy, not making him civically  libertarian, but should also respect people's privacy and not intervene in the daily lives of citizens when it isn't necessary, not making him  authoritarian. So, this makes him a center libertarian. He's critical of anarchist societies and their inability to sustain themselves, with  Nestor Makhno's  Makhnovia being a prime example of this, it was a  military dictatorship ran by a mob of people, in the same way he sees  authoritarian societies being ran by a  few select groups of people. With these groups wanting the same societies, but with the only difference being who you are being controlled by, he sees centrism as the most logical position to hold.

[[File:Socdem.png]] Overview [[File:Socdem.png]]
Mattism's economic model is mainly modelled after social democratic corporatism. He primarily believes in strong market regulations to protect the interests of consumers and fix failures in the market,  pro-labor union stances to fight for worker's rights, a  mixed market economy, the creation of a  universal welfare state to redistribute wealth, a  land value tax to replace landlords under public land ownership, and wants to model an economy off of the business model of  worker co-operatives. He also takes many populist stances on economics with this in-mind, he believes in policies that  put the needs of our workforce first to strengthen labor against  globalist policies that threaten to weaken the power of labor unions in favor for  massive corporations, which only contribute to the current   neoliberal system. So, overall, he's your pretty average social democrat. He would classify himself as a left-wing social democrat with these views, as he adheres more to  classical social democratic economics seen during post-WW2 than he does with  right-wing social democrats which started to arise during the 1980's. He gets a lot of inspirations on economics from the  classical progressive period of the United States, and models his form of progressivism off of it with some adjustments for the modern day, along with western Europe and their  social market economies,  welfare states, and  economic tripartism.

Despite his left-wing beliefs, he is skeptical of most forms of socialism, believing that  capitalism has ultimately shown itself to be the best economic system in most of its forms, with having the longest longevity compared to such economic systems. In spite of this, he believes that numerous regulations are necessary to keep this success, and to make the economy work for everyone. Taxation & Spending =

[[File:Keynes.png]] Fiscal Policy [[File:Keynes.png]]
In terms of macroeconomics, Mattism is self-described as a Keynesian, he believes that the government should actively take a hand in the market and create fiscal programs that increase spending to boost growth in the economy. Supporting increases of spending during times of crisis to dampen the damage done during said crisis, to recover the economy. The type of keynesian economic branch he subscribes to would be closest to that of new keynesianism.

[[File:Univhealth.png]] Healthcare [[File:Univhealth.png]]
Mattism is supportive of a, believing that it is detrimental to the nation to have people who cannot afford to pay for healthcare to be indebted just because they cannot pay. With the current healthcare system we have being more expensive with providing less coverage than it if it was just universal. He defends healthcare acts like Obamacare that expand healthcare coverage for people, but would prefer to transfer them into a universal healthcare system. Private healthcare options would still exist, as luxury for those who choose it, with the universal healthcare being the main option. However, preventable self-inflicted injuries such as drug abuse or being unvaccinated will not be covered, and that will directly come out of insurance or pocket.

[[File:Social_corpratism.png]] Mode of Production [[File:Social_corpratism.png]]
Mattism's mode of production would combines elements from Neo-corporatism and  Dirigisme. He believes that the government should have its share in the market through state owned enterprises in sections of the economy that are naturally monopolistic, such as railways and electric grids. And, in sections of the private sector as well, which will compete with businesses within the market to guide the economy. These SOE's would be invested into through a sovereign wealth fund.

He advocates for class collaboration over  class struggle, seeing as classes do provide a benefit to society. And as such, the state should  to negotiate terms, with the state acting as a mediator between the two, seeing it as the best way to abolish class conflict.

[[File:Welf.png]] Welfare State [[File:Welf.png]]
Mattism believes that the state should play a  in one's life in terms of economics, to provide for the people, actively redistribute wealth, and promote equality of opportunity. With this, he is supportive of the expansion of the welfare state, and for the government to provide for goods and services to the people. He favors a universal welfare state as a way of redistribution of the wealth. Despite this, however, he isn't against private charities, and they will still exist. Given, they are certified to be a legitimate charity. As, he realizes the importance private charities play in both his life and the lives of many others, which would still be there. But, he prefers government solutions for redistributing income, seeing it as more effective.

[[File:Regulationism.png]] Taxation [[File:Regulationism.png]]
Mattism favors high amounts of taxation to fund a universal welfare state, and the upkeep in social services for the population. And, these taxes will better help achieve equality of opportunity .The list of taxes that would be introduced would include:
 * [[File:Georgist.png]] Land value tax - This is to decommodify land ownership, the tax will be between 80 - 100%. As well, being a landlord can no longer be considered a full time job, but private ownership of land will still exist.
 * [[File:EconProg.png]] Wealth tax - The rich will be significantly taxed more through a progressive tax system. But, we cannot rely on just taxing the rich alone, as that isn't sustainable towards funding a welfare state. There will be various other methods used to get the most out of wealth redistribution.
 * [[File:Soccap.png]] Value added tax - A VAT tax will be used, as they've shown to be better at raising funds. And, with the added benefit that they are less easier to dodge.
 * [[File:Apolit.png]] Personal income tax - The personal income tax rate would be at 40%, this would be applied progressively as well, but that would be the median tax rate overall.
 * [[File:Envi.png]] Carbon tax - This tax would be to stop companies from polluting the environment with carbon emissions, it will be progressive.
 * [[File:DvCoordination.png]] Payroll tax - The payroll tax will be used to tax employ and employer income.
 * [[File:Religious.png]] Church tax - Churches will be taxed progressively based on their size. And, there will be more ways of taxing religious sites other than just directly taxing them.
 * [[File:Long.png]] Corporate tax - The ideal corporate tax rate would be 30 - 40%. Green technology companies would have a significantly lower corporate tax rate, as to encourage innovation.
 * [[File:Protect.png]] Import duties - This is to protect vital industry from foreign competitors. But, how high or low the duty is were it depends on where the goods come from. Like say, from a country we are on good terms with, there would be significantly lower import duties. But, countries that are used by companies for cheap labor or those that politically threaten us would have significantly higher import duties, to make those practices unprofitable, and protect the interest of American workers.
 * [[File:Krit.png]] Sin tax - Sin tax is needed to fund social programs. However, the former should be low as the tax is quite regressive and doesn't contribute a lot towards taxation. With only the most harmful goods (like drugs) being taxed at a significant rate, things like junk food and ect will be notably lower.

[[File:Corp.png]] Corporate Welfare [[File:Corp.png]]
Corporate welfare can be accurately described as "socialism for the rich, capitalism for the poor", and should end. He is against bailing out firms that are deemed "too big to fail". If a business is "too big to fail", then it is too big to exist. Seeing it as contributing to crony capitalism and favoritism within the economy. Were the wealth is being concentrated to the top one percent, with small businesses being left in the dust. He supports ending corporate welfare for big businesses. However, other forms of industry would still be subsidized, as he doesn't support ending corporate welfare entirely, just for those big businesses.


 * -| Business Models =

[[File:SyndieSam.png]] Unions [[File:SyndieSam.png]]
Mattism supports trade unions and the right of workers to unionize, seeing the collapse of unions in the United States as disaster for both worker rights and the  progressive movement. So, in the labor market, there would be strong unionization of the working class, viewing unions as a favorable means to achieve working rights, along with it being necessary for the  progressive movement to keep political power. Trade unions and how they would be organized would be through. With state-owned unions and state-owned businesses making tripartite agreements even easier to ensure economic growth. However, he is skeptical of public unions, as their interests have often collided with the interests of society.

He is also against union busting, believing that it is unconstitutional. Only being allowed when there is legitimate reason to do so, like when the union in question doesn't have the best interest of the workers they are representing. And, he thinks that companies that partake in such practice should be severely punished.

[[File:Cap.png]] Small Business [[File:Cap.png]]
Mattism believes it is important to pander to small businesses and small business owners, because small businesses are better for local communities, workers, and competition. So, there will be numerious policies that favor small businesses over big businesses. Aforementioned trade policies that prioritize the local economy over the  global economy,  strong anti-trust laws, and  taxing small businesses lightly to achieve a thriving local economy.

[[File:Cooperative Socialism.png]] Worker Co-operatives [[File:Cooperative Socialism.png]]
Mattism defends worker co-operatives, and believes that  worker co-ops as a business model have shown to be superior to other forms of traditional business models. And, is in favor of an economy which has its primary business model made up of worker co-ops. Medium to small-sized enterprises should be ran as worker co-operatives, although, this won't be enforced, as he realizes that an economy made up entirely up of this business model cannot sustain itself, and other forms of traditional business models will be allowed. This will be encouraged through things like tax breaks and subsidizes. Along with being a supporter of workplace democracy, as he believes that workers should be allowed to democratically control the workplace the workers work in. It will allow the workers to have more say in the production they produce, while not directly handing over the means of production to the workers. With the further democratization of the workplace and economic control given the workers via these means, this would ensure the


 * -| Regulations =

[[File:Plutocrat.png]] Wealth [[File:Plutocrat.png]]
Mattism, while accepting the fact that people will be naturally richer than others, and that hierarchies will form as a result of this, seeks to counteract the harmful effects of wealth inequality with the creation of high income and inherent taxes for wealthy families, along with wealth caps for CEO's, this will further weaken the influence of  elitist billionaires while redistributing wealth for our  social systems. However, he isn't opposed to billionaires existing, and realizes the benefits they have for our economy, but also realizes that they hold too much influence in our government and economy. So, if they are to exist, they should fairly contribute to the economy in taxes, respect environmental regulations, not offshore their wealth in other countries for tax avoidance, and not outsource our jobs to countries with lower wages. The wealthy people that do partake in these practices should be severely punished, and have all their assets nationalized by the government

[[File:NatProg.png]] Anti-Monopoly Laws [[File:NatProg.png]]
Mattism supports breaking up massive monopolies. As everyone knows, it is not good to have monopolies dominating an economy. In this case, he would support bringing back the strong anti-trust laws that were present during the progressive era of the United States. Along with this, the CEO's of said companies shouldn't be allowed to own any shares in the companies that are broken up. It's not good for any economy to have huge businesses dominating the market, as it lowers the competitiveness and the ease of doing business in said economy, which is bad for economic output and growth of the economy.

[[File:Bankocracy.png]] Banking [[File:Bankocracy.png]]
Mattism believes in the creation of a strong central bank to regulate the supply of monetary units, as if the banking sector fails, then that brings our economy down too. This will ensure the economic stability of our economy. However, private banks will still be allowed to exist, given under extensive regulation. And, how the banks and credit unions would be ran would be dependent on the size of said bank. The banking sector should be controlled by economic experts to ensure that it stays effective.

[[File:Georgist.png]] Housing [[File:Georgist.png]]
On housing, Mattism views housing as a basic human right. And believes that this is were the market fails the most. He wishes to establish a land value tax to replace  property taxes. He supports. However, land value tax cannot be the only tax. As, the tax on its own wouldn't be enough to fund welfare programs. But, the reveune generated from this tax would contribute to the welfare state, making him a Social Georgist.

With zoning laws, he would relax single-family zoning to allow for the development of income housing, which is more mixed for home buyers with different types of income. As, the housing crisis that this country is facing is causing social instability. He doesn't believe it makes a whole lot of sense to regulate land use. The land value tax coupled with the liberalization of zoning laws would fight off land speculation and strengthen tenant unions.

[[File:Social-ism.png]] Employment [[File:Social-ism.png]]
Mattism believes that employment should be handled through government programs that help the unemployed find employment in the labor market, through active labor market policies, such as  welfare to work. Ideally, the unemployment rate should be somewhere around 5 - 6%.

[[File:EconProg.png]] Wages [[File:EconProg.png]]
Mattism supports wage labor, vieiwing the  labor theory of value as more exploitive than paying employees by how much hours they work. Minimum wage would be adjusted with yearly inflation, the wages themselves being different for each job field you want to be employed in. The base line standard being a wage that allows you provide for yourself at the bare minimum, with states adjusting it to fit the needs of their population retrospectively. He views yearly increases in minimum wage as necessary for defeating economic inequality, which is why he views the stagnating wages in the United States as disastrous, as wages stagnating has caused wealth inequality for all groups of people to rise, along with contributing to racial and gender pay gaps.


 * -| Trade =

[[File:Protect.png]] Trade [[File:Protect.png]]
Mattism advocates for a fair-trade policy that protects our jobs and makes sure the products coming into our country respect human rights and labor standards. He is opposed to economic globalization because job outsourcing has caused our  manufacturing industry and  trade union movement to dissipate. Subsequently, being destructive for the progressive movement and contributing to the  corpocratic state we are living in now, which has created a system that concentrates all of the wealth into massive corporations, leaving local economies to slowly die. This has caused traditional social democratic parties to compromise their  keynesian economics for  chicagoan economics, as can be seen with the rise of  third way neoliberalism during the 1980's, which has taken over the center-left parties in the West. While at the same time, he is opposed to autarky because it has always lead to economic stagnation. With this, he supports low tariffs and economic interdependence between countries that have similar labor, environmental, and human rights standards. While supporting higher tariffs against countries that have worse labor, environmental, and human rights standards. As, he realizes that most countries cannot survive off of pure self-sufficiency, and protectionist policies have often lead to things like wars and the destruction of entire economies, but the need for a healthy balance is also present to benefit the working class and small business owners.

He encourages developing countries to form economic trade blocs that rival both eastern and western powers, as a way to keep both of the blocs from exploiting them. This would improve things like wages and environmental protections for said countries, with the added benefit of not being too reliant on either bloc.

[[File:Indust.png]] National Production [[File:Indust.png]]
The United State's industrial capacity is a joke compared to what it could be if we actually tried to prop up the American manufacturing industry. Mattism seeks to make America more self-reliant country, as the United States is one of the rare countries that could be more self-reliant and still achieve a decent standard of living. Things like our phones and cars should be encouraged to be made here by American manufacturers, as we need to be more self-reliant against cheap imports that lower our wages and cost us our jobs, which has killed the monster that could be the manufacturing industry of the United States.

[[File:Indiv.png]] Overview [[File:Indiv.png]]
Mattism is a cultural reformist, supporting many  progressive societal refor ms while being weary of some of the things progressives advocate for, like  intersectionality. He would be a horseshoe centrist when it comes to cultural extremism, seeing the  far-left as no different from the  far-right, regarding both of these groups as equally cringe. He's critical of the modern day left for being just as dogmatic as the  modern day right in the United States, with both sides being focused on victim blaming each other over actual policies that help people, and prefers to focus on economic issues than social issues. But, on the social issues themselves, he supports,  societal secularization,  ,  criminal justice reform, ect.

So, his general ideas reflect individualism, stemming from his  liberal rationale on personal freedom and his  anti-authoritarian stances, so long as something isn't breaking the  harm principle, he doesn't care, people should be allowed to do what they want in this regard, making him a  cultural liberal. He believes in extensive civil liberties, like  sexual freedom,  right to privacy,  freedom of movement, the  right to free speech and assembly, and the  right to die.

These cultural views could be described as being a dirtbag leftist and an  old leftist, being opposed to  woke leftists who force things like identity politics and political correctness onto people, but being opposed to most forms of  social conservatism, as conservatism is an anti-individualist ideology in the same way elements of progressivism that were just mentioned are.

Gender & Sex =

[[File:Gay.png]] LGBT [[File:Gay.png]]
Mattism's stance on  largely stims from his  individualist stances on culture, they can have their rights including full marriage and adoption equality, along with religious organizations and businesses having to respect gay marriages, as freedom of religion is no excuse to discriminate against other people. So, as people, they should be looked upon equally towards that of heterosexual people so long as they aren't harming other people and protected from hate crimes, as it's wrong to give people fewer rights over factors they couldn't control because they were born with it. However, the distinction between regular LGBT people and the pride movement should be made clear, as he is opposed to the movement and what it propagates, not out of any traditional values, but because it pushes identity politics and other woke ideas onto people, which is propagated by  big businesses that use it as an excuse to make money off of it. So, both pride (yes, this includes straight pride as well, as identity politics are degenerate no matter whose doing it) and homophobia should be looked down upon. Will there be any restrictions on such events relating to LGBT Pride? There will be some restrictions put on to these events, mostly to prevent things like public displays of nudity and other things like that, although they will be allowed given under some regulations, but not banned. Although, he would prefer for the replacement of these events with other events that do not rely on identity politics that bring people together in the same way, because he does realize the usefulness of the idea of pride month, but thinks how its done is not good. Preferably, this topic should be depoliticised, as the mere mentioning of this issue causes toxic rants to arise from both its supporters and opposers.

And, to address the transgender issue, his stance on them is what he said previously about LGBT people, he doesn't care about them or their sexuality. Both transphobia and trans pride should be looked down upon equally. So, while he will recognize them by their gender they choose to transition to, the conditions for that are: having to have gone through actual gender dysphoria, not being flamboyant about such, and being of legal age to have gone through such procedures. However, despite healthcare services being offered, there will be some restrictions put onto gender reaffirming healthcare to prevent such dangers from happening relating to such procedures. But, it will be provided by healthcare givers because it is a form of healthcare. Additionally, while he believes they should be allowed to participate in sports they choose, he also believes in balancing societal inclusion of them and keeping the integrity of said sports in-tack, so there would be regulations in place to ensure the mutual respect for both of these. He's skeptical of the more radical concepts like gender fluidness and self-identification. So, while gender transitioning will be recognized, things like gender fluidness and gender neutral pronouns will not be recognized. He will recognize the sexualities that exist, Gay,  Straight,  Lesbian,  Transgender,  Bisexual, and  Asexual. And, while he recognizes that Intersex people exist, that will not counted as a separate gender. Xenogenders and neopronouns will not be legally recognized.

[[File:Fem.png]] Feminism [[File:Fem.png]]
Mattism is a feminist ideology, and a staunch supporter of women's rights. He's against traditional gender roles, seeing them as a product of society, and not that of nature. Thinking it's best that women break free from the constraints of them, as this would ultimately contribute to a society were women are more free to decide their own paths in life, along with men being disadvantaged by these roles as well, it ultimately helps both sexes. There is no fundamental difference between a man and a women, both should sexes be treated the same and dealt the same punishes and rewards. However, he's critical of modern modern day feminism in the United States because of focuses too much on things  intersectional identity politics that enforces the narrative onto women that society is everything to blame for their shortcomings, when they just don't want to improve and keep victim blaming, which encourages a toxic mindset onto people. So, his preferred form of feminism would combine elements from first and second wave feminism,  men's liberation,  postcolonial feminism, and  social feminism that focuses on the equality of both sexes without the   men hating femcels or  women hating incel type groups of people. He recognizes the two genders that exist, male and  female.

However, he is against affirmative action, seeing it as the employers decision to hire based on  merit, instead of things like gender, race, ect. Seeing it as promoting discrimination that it seeks to fight, and pushes victim blaming onto people for how they were born. Technology =

[[File:Modtransh.png]] Technology [[File:Modtransh.png]]
Mattism supports the development of green technology to combat climate change, along with being supportive of  Democratic Transhumanism in terms of things like job automation, as if it is to happen, then that money should go to  social programs to combat the unemployment caused by job automation. However, he can't consider himself a transhumanist because of many reasons. But, he opposes those who think that technological development is bad. So, he's an overall technological moderate, realizing the both good and bad of technological development, he opposes technological acceleration because of the effect it would have on things like the environment, for example. But, he doesn't support slowing technological development as well.

[[File:FDF-Pirate.png]] Copyright Reform [[File:FDF-Pirate.png]]
Mattism is supportive of pirate politics, as he believes the current copyright system gives all the power to massive corporations while stifling innovation in the market, which creates a system where these multinational corporations can infinitely extend the copyright of their works to keep them from going into the public domain. Along with how these tech companies mass farm users internet data just to increase their already massive profit margins, which creates many issues in of itself, and just the fact that it is unethical to do that.

[[File:MegaCorp.png]] Big Tech [[File:MegaCorp.png]]
Mattism believes it's important to tackle the power of big technology companies, seeing them as being exploitive, tax evading, data thieves, that directly perpetuate this meaningless culture war. He supports taking away for their corporate welfare benefits like he previously stated in his economic section, and along with directly breaking up their influence for the promotion of alternative social media that do not promote the culture war, as well with promoting policies that raise public awareness through things like campaigns and the development of open source original software. He views this sector of the economy as being particularly egregious for these reasons he just mentioned, the need to create smaller technology companies that follow the worker co-operate business model is desperately needed.

Civil Liberties =

[[File:Pro-ChoiceRemade.png]] Abortion [[File:Pro-ChoiceRemade.png]]
Mattism is, largely stemming from his  individualist stances on  personal freedom which come from his. He sees the ultimate choice lying with the mother, and the government having no authority to regulate the behavior of individuals. As, the right to privacy is a right everyone deserves, and the limiting of abortion rights interferes with said right to privacy. Along with the obvious thing being that abortion isn't murder because the fetus is a bundle of cells, so it doesn't make any sense to limit abortion rights anyways when banning stuff doesn't equal problem solved and has worse effects for society than if it was just legalized. And, as such, is for the liberalization of. Seeing as, a mother that bears a child she cannot financially support will strain our welfare services further, which will be detrimental to the welfare state. With all of this, he sees the overturning of Roe v. Wade as a disaster that not only represents an undemocratic supreme court, but a decision that has wasted decades of civil rights progress, and hopes that abortion rights get reinstated in the future.

He could be described as a eugenicist in this regard, he admires how  Iceland has effectively eliminated conditions like down syndrome with their abortion measures. He believes pre-natal screening of fetuses should be allowed because it is the Mother's choice at the end of the day, and if she brings a baby into the world that will live a below average life because of some condition like down syndrome or autism that will burden both the Mother and society, then she should be allowed to terminate such pregnancy if she chooses, as it's about avoiding human suffering which follows his  utilitarianism, he applies this same logic to euthanasia. So, he would describe himself as a liberal eugenicist, believing it's not only natural, but good that undesirable traits are selectively breaded out throughout the population, this method should be used to improve the traits of human beings in society. However, this form obviously differs from Nazi eugenics, as he believes this should be entirely optional, and doesn't believe those with disabilities in society are worth less than those who don't have such conditions, but believes that these conditions should be prevented through such passive methods to prevent suffering these conditions cause in society.

[[File:Libertarian.png]] Right to Privacy [[File:Libertarian.png]]
Mattism is a staunch defender of the right to privacy and self-responsibility, he sees how world governments have become  increasing violating of such rights as paradoxical. He's fundamentally opposed to anything that challenges this right, since it is one of his core elements in his philosophy, being individual responsibility. So, he naturally believes in extensive civil liberties which gives the person as much freedom from the government as possible to live out their life how they seek fit, and will support policies that give us more societal freedoms.

[[File:FreeSpeak.png]] Freedom of Speech [[File:FreeSpeak.png]]
Mattism supports, seeing it as necessary for a country to keep the market place of ideas running. However, there will be notable restrictions on freedom of speech, such as things like defamation, hate groups, and protecting the public welfare of citizens. So, he's not a free speech absolutist, and while he doesn't believe there should be restrictions on hate speech, he realizes that a world were all ideas are tolerated is one where the intolerant would destroy the tolerant, but overall, there won't be a whole lot of restrictions on freedom of speech. He would prefer to use social ostrocism to counter undesirable   than government censorship. So, he is against hate speech laws, seeing them are inherently coercive to civil liberties, and not actually protecting the people said laws seek to protect the people that they are aimed towards. He does, however, hold a couple of exemptions with this view. Like in Germany for example, where it is a crime to deny  the holocaust, given the context of what happened in that region and where it happened, that should indefinitely stay a crime. But, he dislikes how the governments where laws like these are implemented go overboard with these laws as well, so he would loosen up those laws so they're not as strict. But, not eliminating them. So, outside of this few specific circumstances were these laws happen to be in some countries, he would oppose implementing them in other countries.

[[File:Egirl.png]] Pornography and Prostitution [[File:Egirl.png]]
Mattism is very much pro, he sees it as one's  fundamental freedom to do what they want to do with their body, and is a form of  freedom of speech & expression that doesn't harm anyone. So, he is against most censorship of media relating to pornography, and would legalize/decriminalize it where it is illegalized, Not seeing any point in trying to criminalize something that is hard to crackdown on that can have an industry which contributes billions of dollars to the economy that could be used for things like government programs, with the war on drugs being a great example of this. He's opposed to the Anti-Porn movement, thinking it's even stupider and pointless than the prohibition movement before it. With this, he would legalize prostitution, because sex work is real work and it would make it easier for people involved in the industry to unionize and fight for better working conditions, which creates a safer environment for people want to be involved in such practices with the added benefit of being able to profit off of said services for government expenditures.

[[File:Virus total.png]] Mandates & Lockdowns [[File:Virus total.png]]
Mattism believes that vaccine mandates are important to secure public safety and interests, and is both pro-vaccine and pro-mandate. However, he opposes the draconian lockdowns imposed during the pandemic. While he believes these orders imposed during the pandemic when it started before there was any vaccine developed were good intentioned and necessary to prevent the deaths of millions of people before a vaccine could be developed, he also believes these have greatly expanded state power who use this as an excuse to abuse it for their own gain after such measures are no longer necessary, such as with China's Zero-COVID Policy. So, he's pro-vaccine, anti-lockdown, but these are largely context dependent as well, keep in mind.

[[File:OOTS.png]] Euthanasia [[File:OOTS.png]]
Mattism supports the legalization of euthanasia, both involuntarily and voluntarily. If a mentally ill person chooses to voluntary end their own life, then that is their choice and their choice alone, seeing the right to die as essential to bodily autonomy, and for it to not only be immoral because of the human suffering it causes, but also cost ineffective as well, as tax money shouldn't go towards people who choose to voluntary end their own lives.

[[File:GRights.png]] Gun Rights [[File:GRights.png]]
Mattism is neither pro-gun or anti-gun, he believes that people should be allowed to own guns, given they have no criminal back round. But, with this, he is a supporter of gun control, and believes in expanding things like backround checks and ect to make sure bad actors cannot get their hands on guns, which is what could be seen for the extensive gun violence problem this country faces due to the permissive gun laws of some of the states. And, while not wanting to outright ban weapons that are deemed "for war" like assault rifles, he wants extensive regulations on them, and should be made really difficult to get. Seeing as the majority of people will never own these types of fire arms, but still believing that people who want to own them and can actually afford them should be allowed to own them. Cultural =

[[File:Cball-CSA.png]] Confederate Statues [[File:Cball-CSA.png]]
Mattism supports the tearing down of confederate statues, they were traitors that succeeded from this country and represent  white supremacy, which shouldn't be glorified. Any self-described patriot should support the dismantling of the confederate statues, along with banning the confederate flag from being displayed on things like government property and discouraging the symbols for being used as a representation of the South. However, the statues being taken down should be done with context as well, so he opposes the tearing down of statues like presidents, but statues that specifically glorify the confederacy in a racist matter should be taken down, and ideally, replaced with statues of slave abolitionists.

[[File:Mediastocracy_flair.png]] News and Media [[File:Mediastocracy_flair.png]]
Mattism believes that mainstream media is a decisive tool that has allowed for corporate money to stay on top, with the population being ever so clueless about alternative options, or the way they are being manipluated. Despite this, he thinks bringing back the Fairness Doctrine wouldn't do a whole lot to counteract this problem, mainly due to it being in a time period where it could actually be enforced. A better solution would to directly break up the hegemony of corporate media.

[[File:DvPermission.png]] Permissive Society [[File:DvPermission.png]]
Mattism defends a permissive society. And, believes that as long as an individual's lifestyle doesn't violate the harm principle, then no government or community should be allowed to impose a specific lifestyle onto individuals. With this, he would decriminalize most victimless crimes, seeing no point in enforcing a law that cannot be enforced effectively, with it not making any sense to waste law enforcement resources on things that can be easily regulated to earn untapped money which could be used for things like government programs. As, societies that have increasingly liberal social views have higher rates of  egalitarianism in many fields, so it contributes to a more happier society overall.

[[File:Scientocracy_Small.png]] Education [[File:Scientocracy_Small.png]]
Mattism believes our education system is in desperate need of reform. And, that education should be free from K-12, with college tuition being free as well, seeing tuition fees as stupid. With how things are taught, he is in favor of impartially, as things like History shouldn't be taught through a nationalistic lens. Public schools will be secular and based on  humanism. On the topic of LGBT, he thinks it should be neither banned or mandatory, instead opting for a more fair option that makes it optional, so he opposes both sides of this debate.

In terms of schools and how they are administered, he believes that there should be a mix of private and public schools, with private schools as luxury, but shouldn't be funded through things like vouchers. With the attention going to meeting the upkeep of public schools.

[[File:Laicism.png]] Cultural Secularism [[File:Laicism.png]]
Mattism, despite being a secular ideology, is skeptical of the influence of  organized religion on society and a  cultural religion, because these cultural influences have been used to suppress  individual rights and liberties. Being against these cultural influences for these reasons, this would make him an anti-clericalist. He sees organized religion as corrupt and self-serving, with everything else he just mentioned, he would prefer for societal ethics to be based off of secular ones, and believes that the decline of organized religion has been largely beneficial for society.

[[File:Enlightnenment.png]] Culture War [[File:Enlightnenment.png]]
Mattism, being an old leftist, doesn't want to focus on  culture war issues too much, believing that these issues are propagated by  media outlets that are focused on pitting people up against each other for their own profit, which gets in the way of actual economic issues. However, on the actual culture war issues themselves, he's overall critical on how both conservatives and  progressives are too busy victim blaming each other than actual policy making.

On specific issues relating to the culture war, he's critical of the modern day left and its use of postmodernism because of its abandonment of  enlightenment rationality and the  scientific method of empirical evidence for an  obscurant view of the world that suits their ideological agendas. This can be seen how the new left tolerates backwards ideologies like Islamic fundamentalism through their endoursement of  multiculturalism for the sake of diversity. Along with the concept of gender fluidness, viewing the attempt to make gender a non-binary thing with the introduction of non-binary pronouns as an attempt to control what people can actually say through political correctness which creates the victimhood cult he mentioned. While those suffering from genuine gender dysphoria should be allowed to transition, live a normal life, and have their rights, he believes these attempts at transgender inclusion into society don't actually create any inclusion, if transgender people want to be treated normally, they should largely assimilate into greater society instead of trying to stand out to garner societal acceptance, as this only enables hatred of them as individuals. He's also critical of how the the left says they support free-speech, but only if it abides by their politically correct terms, using  cancel culture as a tactic to silence those they disagree with, while being a fragile face of civility that suppresses the  individual worth of people themselves. With all of this considered, he's critical of modern day conservatism in the way same, as conservatives attack the civil rights of actual  gay people who want to live normal lives, with the  LGBT conservative movement being a prime example of this, as they usually drop the T part of the LGBT since they've already gotten their rights like gay marriage. Along with attacking other civil right landmarks like abortion rights. And the counter-cultural movements that are filled with contradictions like  "Back the blue!", but also  "Don't tread on me!1!1!1!". He's quite frankly fed up with both groups, he would prefer to work with the progressive left on issues were it matters like abortion rights, but oppose other things they advocate for as a realpolitik approach towards achieving his political goals. Ideally, both these cultural influences should weaken and a more multiparty system would take its place.

[[File:Native.png]] Indigenous Rights [[File:Native.png]]
Mattism is supportive of indigenous rights, he believes  imperialism in both the  modern day and historical context has destroyed their native cultures. Policies that give indigenous groups more autonomy over their land and improve their quality of life should be actively pursued. However, he absolutely despises how people suggest multiculturalism as a way of solving this issue, believing that it threatens to destroy their ways of life and creates the same issues it seeks to solve, he supports a more  intercultural approach, believing that they should at least adopt the  national identity of the country.

[[File:ProDrug.png]] Drugs [[File:ProDrug.png]]
Mattism believes that drug war was unilateral disaster that put many innocent lives in jail and only contributed to the prison industrial complex. He supports the, with soft drugs being completely legalized. Seeing as the "law" cannot even be enforced properly, it being a law in the first place is quite useless. Along with this, all non-violent drug offenders would be released from jail to free up law enforcement resources. However, there should be government programs available that encourage drug addicts to get off of drugs, and find healthier alternatives. As, drugs are a societal problem, not a legal problem. And, throwing people in jail for using these substances only further properates the core issues at heart.

[[File:Klep.png]] Criminal Justice Reform [[File:Klep.png]]
Mattism believes that systemic racism is still well alive and present within the American justice system, despite how long we've come since Jim crow laws. And, as such, is a supporter of criminal justice reform. For police unions, he believes that police unions should still exist, but with their negotiating powers restricted. As, the importance of collective bargaining for cops is just as important for any job field, but realizes that the interests of society and police unions often collide, with it having been used to obscure criminal justice reform. With this, he would redirect wasteful spending to social programs. But, opposes the more radical notions of abolishing or defunding the police.

On prisoners and prisons, he opposes capital punishment, and believes that it should be outlawed in all the states. The justice system should focus on rehabilitative justice. With prisoners being allowed to vote once they've finished their prison sentence and have payed the price for their crimes. Along with the state having programs that aid convicts that are released to help them reintegrate into greater society. However, he realizes that some crimes are too bad to forgive. In this case, he would support punitive justice, but with the chance of parole. He opposes the privatization of prisons, as privatized prisons are bad for a rehabilitative justice system were the private contractors are only encouraged to make money, and not help with the reintegration of prisoners into greater society and disregard their own wellbeing makes public safety and the wellbeing of society worse off. However, while he does support racial sensitivity training for police, he believes it shouldn't be based on critical race theory, as said previous, it's a form of reverse discrimination. Environmental =

[[File:Envi.png]] Environmentalism [[File:Envi.png]]
Mattism is a supporter of environmental justice, he sees protection of the environment as upmost importance, as climate change is something that is not only very real, but something that actively threatens the lives of billions of people. He sees it as a necessary step to transitioning out of fossil fuels for the near future, along with the trade deals for our country needing to respect environmental standards, as  neoliberal capitalism has lead to the exploitation of the environment by creating a  race to the bottom, which causes businesses to disregard environmental standards for their own profit margins. The government must start subsidizing green alternatives to weaken the fossil fuel industry. and make a trasition towards nuclear power. Along with greater investments being put into green technology, seeing it as a key factor in defeating climate change. Although, he would prefer for the government to just nationalize most of these industries relating to natural resources, were these state owned businesses would contribute to a sovereign wealth fund which would go to things like the welfare state and other government expenditures.

[[File:Deepe.png]] Animal Rights [[File:Deepe.png]]
Mattism supports animal rights. As, animals are living beings at the end of the day. And, while not on the same level as Deep Ecology. He supports the the banning of most animal testing. As, animal testing isn't even guaranteed to produce good results, at the cost of inflicting unnecessary suffering to other living beings. He would also improve the living standards of animals being farmed for food, as the way they get treated is just excessively horrific. Although, he isn't going vegan, and doesn't expect anyone else to either. Race =

[[File:Equality.png]] Racial Egalitarianism [[File:Equality.png]]
Mattism is against racial and/or  ethnic discrimination, viewing these as irrational and dangerous influences on society. Things like racial/ethnic discrimination should be looked down heavily, and shouldn't be a factor towards things like immigration. With this, he is a civic nationalist, seeing a country is defined by a common way of life and culture. So, he is favor of complete racial equality, seeing racial and ethnic inequality as determinantal to a country that should be actively fought. As, all men, regardless of their back round, are created equal, and are entitled to the same rights with due respect for their differences.

[[FIle:MLK Jr.png]] Colorblind Society [[FIle:MLK Jr.png]]
Mattism, being against racialism and for  racial equality, hates how  modern progressives  obsess over identities like race, because it is inherently discriminatory  | in the same way white nationalists do it, saying that people must do "this and that" based on identities like these are no different from groups like Neo-Nazis who obsess over the same things. So, he rejects an approach to solving systematic racism that relies on identity politics, viewing this as a form of reverse discrimination that is the exact same thing it tries to solve, because it judges people based on their traits like race and not on them as individuals.

With all of this, he used to support movements like BLM after George Floyd was murdered. However, he's critical of the current movement now as being filled with people who are obsessed with things like identity politics and harboring racial nationalists. As, the organization itself makes good points about police brutality that he does agree with, he disagrees with the approach, seeing these approaches towards fighting police brutality as not doing anything for actual racial equality. As well, he disavows the violence on both sides. So, he also opposes things like critical race theory for same reasons, he supports a  colorblind society were people are judged based on their character instead of their ethnicity or race. He also opposes movements like Antifa, while the creator of this page holds vehement opposition towards all forms of reactionary and totalitarian ways of thinking, he sees the modern Antifa movement as being filled with activists who use the same tactics as the same fascists they claim to fight with things like free speech suppression and violence. His preferred form of opposition towards such movements are peaceful protests. He specifically takes inspiration from the left-wing paramilitary group, the iron front during the  Weimar Republic. While he doesn't believe in curtailing freedom of speech and expression just because the opposition holds political views that he doesn't agree with, but still thinks these groups of people should be socially ostracized for their beliefs as to discourage the spread of such beliefs. So, he supports tougher punishments for hate crimes and crackdowns on groups like the Alt-Right.

[[File:Klep.png]] Criminal Justice Reform [[File:Klep.png]]
Mattism believes that systemic racism is still well alive and present within the American justice system, despite how long we've come since Jim crow laws. And, as such, is a supporter of criminal justice reform. For police unions, he believes that police unions should still exist, but with their negotiating powers restricted. As, the importance of collective bargaining for cops is just as important for any job field, but realizes that the interests of society and police unions often collide, with it having been used to obscure criminal justice reform. With this, he would redirect wasteful spending to social programs. But, opposes the more radical notions of abolishing or defunding the police.

On prisoners and prisons, he opposes capital punishment, and believes that it should be outlawed in all the states. The justice system should focus on rehabilitative justice. With prisoners being allowed to vote once they've finished their prison sentence and have payed the price for their crimes. Along with the state having programs that aid convicts that are released to help them reintegrate into greater society. However, he realizes that some crimes are too bad to forgive. In this case, he would support punitive justice, but with the chance of parole. He opposes the privatization of prisons, as privatized prisons are bad for a rehabilitative justice system were the private contractors are only encouraged to make money, and not help with the reintegration of prisoners into greater society and disregard their own wellbeing makes public safety and the wellbeing of society worse off. However, while he does support racial sensitivity training for police, he believes it shouldn't be based on critical race theory, as said previous, it's a form of reverse discrimination.

[[File:Blacknat.png]] Slavery Reparations [[File:Blacknat.png]]
Mattism doesn't support slavery reparations, as they are largely unfeasible. And, even if they were feasible, he still wouldn't support them. As, nobody in the present day is responsible for slavery or the actions of their ancestors. But, he does have other solutions to these issues present, as he does realize the legacy of slavery and its consequences are still present within African-American communities, his police reforms and getting rid of discriminatory zoning laws that disproportionally effect groups within these regions would combat poverty and crime seen within these neighborhoods, as the socio-economic factors do still need to be accounted for as well, and developing those socio-economic factors needs to happen. Other Issues =

[[File:Reform.png]] Reformism [[File:Reform.png]]
Mattism is a reformist ideology. And, in the context of liberal democracy,  left-reformism would be used to achieve my ideological goals. Seeing as, revolutionary means of achieving ideological change has often resulted in complete failure. However, there are some exceptions to this, being, places were democratic reform isn't possible. In that case, he would support a revolution against the government. Some of these places would include, China,, Russia,  Cuba, and other autocracies in the world that don't respect due process and political rights. With this, he's a firm supporter of pro-democracy movements in countries fighting for political rights, he supports the  Russian opposition,  Milk Tea Alliance,  Hong Kong democracy protestors,  Belarusian opposition, and ect. Seeing these authoritarian regimes as shitty and oppressive, he supports anything that undermines their rule.

[[File:Autism.png]] Mental Health [[File:Autism.png]]
Mattism, being on the  himself, naturally supports mental health treatment for those who need it and cannot support themselves. However, while he supports mental health treatment, he also is critical of the societal approach people have towards these issues. He views conditions like Autism as over-diagnosed in our modern day society, with even showing the slightest of symptoms for such things leading to being diagnosed and labels like "high-functioning" being completely self-defeating. He also dislikes how these disorders are romanticized in our current culture as well, making it even more self-defeating, he's against things like politically correct terms and self-identification, seeing these as failing to create any inclusion towards society and more or less just downplaying the actual suffering of people who go through such mental health problems. Those who need help should be allowed to get the help that they need and have societies support and understanding, but he also feels as if people use it as an excuse not to do anything when they're more than capable of doing so, which in itself is a symptom of our current culture among other issues.

[[File:Youth.png]] Youth [[File:Youth.png]]
Mattism is conflicted on  youth politics, having a likening of the  2000's culture of apoliticism were politics were less important unlike now, as our current culture has allowed easily impretionable children towards political extremism through internet indoctrination that likely wouldn't have come if the climate wasn't like how it is now. However, he also realizes the importance of a political youth in combatting the gerontocracy our government is. So, if things like politics are to be taught in things like schools and the youth is to be political, then it should be done in a neutral way that encourages students to pick their own beliefs while raising awareness against extremist thought.

[[File:Health and Safetyf.png]] Public Health and Safety [[File:Health and Safetyf.png]]
For health crisis's like drugs or obesity, Mattism doesn't think outright shaming the people themselves is a good idea, as it just leads to them being rejected by society without being able to integrate or easily get help. But, he also doesn't think these things should be idolized as well, the state should campaign against these through things like advertisements and the like, but the state should never step in directly to correct the behavior of individuals themselves. He realizes the need for a paternalistic government for things like disasters such as pandemics for harm reduction, but when there isn't a serious harm to public health posed by an individuals lifestyle that directly harms other people, then the government should mostly lay off the general population. Things like sin taxes should still exist, as some milder forms of harm reduction that don't outright intervene in the daily lives of citizens are needed for society.

[[File:Multicult.png]] Identity Politics [[File:Multicult.png]]
Mattism in-general avoids  , and is something that he disapproves of. As, idpol propagates essentialist views of people's identity, which makes it inherently discriminatory. The focus on group identities completely undermines the individual needs of people, creating a culture of victimhood that causes people to push blame onto others while failing to improve their own individual worth, while leading to the abandonment of universal liberal values. He realizes that both sides of this  culture war are guilty of doing this, and will call out both of them were its due. Because on the left, you have woke baizuos who focus on how oppressed black lesbian trans people are, and on the right, you have  racial nationalists and other forms of supremacist identity politics. He against both because he believes they suppress the individual worth of people.

[[File:World.png]] Overview [[File:World.png]]
Mattism is opposed to imperialism and  warmongering, so he supports the. However, this view is contrasted with isolationism, because he doesn't support withdrawing from international treaties and organizations we are involved in, as could be seen with  Trump's American first policy. He supports scaling back our military involvement while contributing more of our national resources for  humanitarian aid and achieving deals with other countries through  multilateral agreements by organizations like the  United Nations. So, he would be a peaceful internationalist, and subscribes to a  universalist view of the world, which is in-part from his  political liberalism and  utilitarian moral code, as these are naturally  universal values, he believes its important to uphold these values of  human rights and  democracy in other countries. While at the same time, he's opposed to economic globalization, as previously stated on this page, it's a neoliberal tool that kills the power of labor unions while concentrating the power of wealth into the hands of a few rich elites, and is a form of  neo-imperialism that subjects smaller economies to bigger economies. He would be considered an alter-globalist, his form of globalization would encourage international co-operation while respecting each others economic sovereignty. So, he's skeptical of extreme forms of globalization, seeing these are largely unrealistic and not achievable, he rejects concepts like  world federalism and  anationalsm.

Due to his anti-imperial stances, he's critical of both the west and  the east, with the powers of the west having contributed to neo-imperialism in the same way the east has, he's skeptical of both of their influences. However, he's friendlier with the west because the west respects his values more, but will still call out their imperialism where it is due. His foreign policy would maintain good relations and close co-operation with the West while opposing their imperial wars and other bad things they've done. He supports pro-democracy movements in countries fighting for political freedom like the Milk Tea Alliance.

He's a firm supporter of self-determination, seeing  neo-imperialism as something that should be actively fought against, he supports struggling nations rights to self-determination. This is where his anti-colonial stances come from, thinking that people fighting oppression in authoritative regimes should have the right to self-determination. However, he views independence movements in countries that aren't fighting against authoritarianism with suspicion. Foreign Policy=

[[File:Globnat.png]] Alternative Globalization [[File:Globnat.png]]
Mattism is a internationalist ideology, he wants to work with other countries and build peaceful relations with them for things like climate change and technological development. However, he opposes economic globalization. As, it has created massive wealth inequality, exploited the environment, and has caused the weakening of worker's rights in favor of massive corporations. So, his model of globalization would follow that of the alter-globalist model. Believing that, globalization can be shaped to serve the interests of the working class and not the interest of wealthy corpocratic elites, he wants to preserve the wealth equality of developing countries and utilize the positive effects of globalization like environmental and  technological co-operation.

[[File:Dem.png]] Civil Unrest Groups [[File:Dem.png]]
Mattism supports the backing of civil unrest groups in countries were  political rights are not respected. As stated on his cultural tab, were reformist methods are not possible due to said rights not being present,  revolution and  civil disobedience would naturally be the next best answer, and he believes it's the moral obligation of democratic states to back said protestors against those authoritarian states.

[[File:Internation.png]] Intergovernmental Organizations [[File:Internation.png]]
Mattism doesn't have a problem with intergovernmental organizations themselves, so long as they're bottom-up and democratic, seeing as how this is how developing countries have resisted developed countries exploiting them by doing this. And, while he isn't against military alliances, as he recognizes that they are necessary for securing the national sovereignties of countries, these alliances must be purely for defensive reasons.

[[File:SocialistPatriot.png]] Social Patriotism [[File:SocialistPatriot.png]]
Mattism, despite being an internationalist ideology, doesn't reject  nationalism, seeing it as necessary for anti-colonial movements to take place and for the unity of a country. With this, he supports inclusive forms of nationalism like civic nationalism and  social patriotism. However, he also despises chauvinists, not seeing them as real  patriots of their country, but just as  edgy degenerates. One's nation and values should be shared off of a common culture and way of life instead of pointless things like  ethnicity,  religion, or  race. Seeing these forms of nationalism as unnecessary barriers for both our country and humanity that should be overcome.

[[File:Ecoglob.png]] Environmental Globalization [[File:Ecoglob.png]]
Mattism defends climate treaties like the Paris Agreement and other ones that , believing that we have to work as a united world against climate change. Developed countries should be actively pressured to adopting climate protections and work together with other countries to develop technology that can solve global warming. However, developing countries won't be pressured as much, as they should still conserve their environment, but world powers are the greater evils in this situation. So, some destruction of developing countries environments for economic growth is fine, if it means they industrialize so they can be pressured into conserving their environment in the same way global powers will.

[[File:Techglobe.png]] Technological Globalization [[File:Techglobe.png]]
Mattism supports working together with other countries for the development of new technologies, which coincides with his  environmental globalization policies. He sees it as important to not only develop environmental technology here at home, but to develop it with other countries to combat climate change. Along with other technological advancements like vaccines and ect. However, he realizes the risk of creating a digital divide between the rich and the poor, so regulations will apply that prevent this from happening, which will follow his globalization model.

[[File:Cball-NATO.png]] The West [[File:Cball-NATO.png]]
Mattism is very critical of western powers due to their role in Imperialism, even if decolonization has happened, the West indebts developing countries with globalist organizations like the IMF and the World Bank, and is the biggest spreader of globalist capitalism that enslaves these countries we see today with the foreign interventions that have toppled  social democratic governments for  authoritarian capitalist states. Along with the rising authoritarianism in these states themselves, with the governments enacting more and more policies that erode the right to privacy through things like crime bills and ect that expand the survillence state. To say the West is the defender of the free world is foolish when you consider how much democratic governments they've overthrown in the third world, they are merely self-serving and imperialistic world powers, no matter if the country is democratic or not. However, with all of this in mind, he believes that the West is the lesser evil compared to the powers of the East due to them upholding his values more, but that doesn't mean he fully supports western powers, and will rightfully call them out in their imperialism where it's due. As the current atlanticist system is a bunch of neoliberal garbage that he just criticized. However, for the time being, he will support the United States against regimes like China or Russia for these reason, but will still call out American imperialism.

[[File:Humanismpix.png]] Nuclear Disarmament [[File:Humanismpix.png]]
Mattism supports global nuclear disarmament efforts, seeing nuclear bombs as something that no country should be able to process due to it having the chance of annihilating us as species off of this planet and the inherent unfairness it wields towards countries who possess  them on the international stage. However, there should be some nuclear bombs left over for rare events where it would actually be needed to have, but it should be some sort of collectively owned stock pile by all major countries.

[[File:Euras.png]] The East [[File:Euras.png]]
Mattism is critical of the East in the same way he's critical of the West, as both sides are pretty imperialistic in this regard. Both have contributed to neo-colonialism of third world countries in a bid to gain more influence on the international stage. And, in some aspects, are worse than the West. Primarily for the reason that they are often authoritarian conservative regimes that do not respect human rights or progressive values. He believes Eastern powers should get out of developing countries, and let them decide their own fates without any major power budging in.

[[File:Pac.png]] World Peace [[File:Pac.png]]
Mattism subscribes to the idea that world peace is achievable. Now, while it seems very unlikely, as wars haven't stopped even in the modern day, the amount of wars being fought has significantly decreased over years due to the United States led international liberal world order. However, while this world order is better than the hegemonic powers of the East, it is not desirable in the same way hegemony from Eastern powers is not desirable, world powers will always be after their own self gain. And thus, will be the biggest threats to world peace. So, despite seeing the West as the lesser evil, the countries that pose the biggest threats to world peace are: China, Russia, and the United States. There's more to this, corporate power also poses a threat as well.

[[File:Postconan.png]] Anti-Colonialism [[File:Postconan.png]]
Mattism supports countries fighting for self-determination against  colonialism with his  anti-imperialist mindset,  neo-imperialism is something that should be actively fought against, as  global capitalism is a modern day evil that actively strips countries of their autonomies and cultures which enslaves developing countries to developed countries, and has created a  neo-feudalist system that is controlled by  multinational corporations. However, he's critical of movements that are not fighting against oppressive regimes, and is less likely to support those movements than he is to support the movements of people fighting for independence against authoritarian regimes.

[[File:Internat.png]] Foreign Aid [[File:Internat.png]]
Mattism views foreign aid as a double edged sword. On one hand, when use rightly, it can actually helped underdeveloped countries in need and prevent the deaths of thousands of people through humanitarian aid. But, on the other, it can be used by corrupt officials to further their own wealth, while leaving very little of the population it was intended to be given too. But, in spite of all of this, he still has a rather favorable view of foreign aid, seeing as the United States has helped prevent the deaths of countless people through its foreign aid programs, he is very much in favor of increasing the amount of foreign aid given to developing countries, as all major powers have moral obligations to help developing countries.

[[File:Strato.png]] The Military [[File:Strato.png]]
Mattism is in favor of defunding the national budget of the military, as it is way too bloated for the national security of our country. Along with the thousands of lives that are taken each year in conflicts we intervene in that only benefit the military industrial complex. But, the military should still receive adequate funding for the defense of our national security, as we still need to defend our allies and our international interests, but we can't go bossing other countries around just because we have the diplomatic weight to do so. We should decrease our military involvement in the world while increasing our international co-operation efforts with other countries.

[[File:Isolation.png]] Non-Interventionism [[File:Isolation.png]]
Mattism rejects entangling our troops into other countries just for the sake of combatting the rise of authoritarian states and spreading "democracy". As, this leads to forever endless wars that waste billions of dollars in tax payer money just for the military industrial complex without any actual plans for nation building, which our government doesn't have a good track record with. And, while he holds no sympathies towards said authoritarian states, and would prefer for them to be overthrown and turn into liberal democracies, he is supportive of a  foreign policy. Believing that pacifism as a major power would be destructive and open a power vacuum for other more destructive countries to take hold of. We should abandon most of our military bases outside of our allies to save billions of dollars in tax payer money. Instead of focusing on wasting our resources in other countries, we should focus on our own domestic affairs. The only time military intervening in other countries is justifiable is if it is for humanitarian reasons, the backing of civil unrest groups in undemocratic countries, or if a country has attacked our allies. The presence of our military in the world has caused nothing but suffering for developing countries, and we cannot police the world in this aspect, and we should accept that.

International Organizations =

[[File:Necon.png]] NATO [[File:Necon.png]]
Mattism is skeptical of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, but still supports its continued existence as an alliance. But, with this in mind, he doesn't like some aspects of the alliance. That mainly being, the alliance not requiring its members to maintain its democratic status, not being a purely defensive alliance, and NATO being too centric on the United States. He would've been in favor of abolishing the alliance for a collective security council, but seeing the way things are recently going with current events, the alliance has shown to still have a purpose, and he will still continue to support its existence, as the alternative to what would happen if the alliance was disbanded would be worse. However, he would prefer this alliance to eventually be replaced for a collective security council and reduce the alliance to a purely defensive one, as NATO in its current form is too hegemonic and reliant on the Untied States. But, until the aggression of Russia is pacified and there is no more threats in Europe that threaten the stability and peace within the region, he sees NATO as an alliance that needs to exist out of necessity. He believes Its important that the United States holds good relations with Europe through multilateralism to maintain the transatlantic alliance between Europe and America, but oppose getting involved into any wars not waged out of self-defense.

[[File:Cball-UN.png]] United Nations [[File:Cball-UN.png]]
Mattism believes that the United Nations doesn't really do a whole lot, but sees the organization as a useful tool for peaceful diplomacy. And, as such, is supportive of the United States to remain within the United Nations. But, he would reform the institutions of the United Nations to be more democratic and more representative of its members. As, the UN in its current states only represents the 5 big members. The organization should be used to further diplomatic means for things like environmentalism and humanitarianism to prevent the outbreak of war between countries and other disasters.

However, he is skeptical of using international organizations like the United Nations to further integrate world governments into federations. And, while not despising the concept of this, he sees it as largely impractical, and a tool of neoliberal globalists to further push their agenda. Although, if it was done under alternative globalist means, he wouldn't have a whole lot of an issue with it. Given, the process is entirely voluntary.

On it's agencies like the IMF, WTO, OECD, ect. Mattism opposes them. As, these organizations have indebted third world countries and contributed to economic exploitation of said countries by developed countries.

[[File:Cball-EU.png]] European Union [[File:Cball-EU.png]]
Mattism doesn't oppose the European Union as an idea, as the organization has done good things, like ensuring  peace between the member states,  carbon emission reducing measures, and its role in the protection of consumer goods and standards. However, he dislikes the austerity monetary policies used by the organization, along with the  free-trade agreements, seeing these as  neoliberal policies that cause wealth inequality to rise within Europe. So, he doesn't oppose EU membership itself, but opposes these specific policies of the organization, making him a soft-euroskeptic. Does he support movements like Brexit and others that want to leave the economic union? No, as stated, he is a reformist in this regard, he believes the movements create more issues than they solve if the countries just stayed in the EU, so he is opposed to leaving it in the same way he's opposed to further integration. He wants to democratize the institutions and give the member states greater control over policies like trade and immigration. He opposes the idea of a untied europe, seeing as it is largely impratical, and would either become undemocratic, or fall apart entirely due the massive amounts of disagreements within and between European governments. The parties in the European Parilement he would side with would either be the The Left in the European Parliament or the  Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats.

With this, he is supportive of the European Parliament in sanctioning authoritative governments that are faltering on having democracy, like  Poland. As, the union should do everything in its legal authority to uphold human rights and democracy in the countries residing in it, which is one of the only sides he will take with the European Union on, along with backing pro-democracy protestors in authoritarian regimes like Belarus to undermine their rule.

While he doesn't have a problem with immigration, as it is a good way to fix our demographic crisis, he dislikes what happened during the immigration crisis of 2015. Because, letting in that much immigrants at once for any country would cause immediate conflict, and caused the rise of said right-wing populists to take hold in Europe. So, he defends the more culturally conservative policies of leaders like  Frederiksen for  Denmark and their  anti-Islamic attitudes in other European countries, as  they've shown to not assimilate well into the societies they are placed in, along with France's policy of  Laicism. He believes that left-wing parties must adopt nativist anti-immigration policies to protect their voter base from turning to right-wing populists and to keep them from rising.

Countries =

[[File:Cball-China.png]] China [[File:Cball-China.png]]
The CCP is a pseudo-fascist  totalitarian dictatorship that  doesn't respect human rights or civil liberties. And, is actively commiting the largest human rights abuse since the holocaust, which is not up for debate, cope and seethe 50 cent army retards. Along with having no respect for their own environment or workers rights. Mattism believes that, with all of this in mind, and a lot more, he thinks it's the best interest of the West to contain the influence of the CCP, and their evil practices from spreading. As, the Chinese government has shown to not care for the welfare of its people, and has proven the world time and time again that it is the biggest threat to world peace. The international community should work together to actively condemn China, and to stop their human rights abuses. As well, he would support a democratic uprising against the current Chinese government, similar to that of the Tiananmen Square protests. As, the CCP is not the legitimate ruling party of China. Not even the economic model of China redeems the country, as it's all built off of fraud and corrupt that feeds off of being addicted to debt to keep its system running, with previously stated not having any significant welfare systems or workers protections, it is an authoritarian capitalist state.

However, despite how bad China is and how satisfying it would be for the real China to take over the mainland, we can't just go in a dick-swinging contest with the CCP just because we can, as we need to maintain some level of mutual relationship with the CCP, while also condemning their actions. There are some areas we need to co-operate with the Chinese government on, such as environmental issues, as China is a major power that is contributing to global warming. We should be pursuing a policy of realpolitik with the CCP.

[[File:Cball-US.png]] United States [[File:Cball-US.png]]
Mattism is a patriotic ideology, despite this however, he's critical of the United States and its foreign policy. He sees how NATO interventions backed by the US have overthrown social democratic governments in developing countries for brutal US backed dictators. He believes the foreign policy of the United States needs to greatly change for obvious reasons. And while he supports the US over its foreign aggressors like China and Russia, he believes that both sides are cringe due to their role of imperialism.

[[File:Cball-Taiwan.png]] Taiwan [[File:Cball-Taiwan.png]]
Mattism fully supports Taiwan over this dispute, and believes that the  Chinese government has no legitimate authority in claiming the Taiwanese island or messing with the national sovereignty of another country. Taiwan itself is the most based state in East Asia compared to its neighbors like Japan or South Korea, with it being the most progressive and an actual functioning democracy that respects human rights. He is also a staunch supporter of Taiwanese independence on the international stage, along with giving his full and critical support for the  Milk Tea Alliance, and the  Hong Kong Protesters. Along with this, he supports the United States in militarily defending  Taiwan if the  CCP ever launched a military invasion of the Island. Although, that probably would never happen anyways, as the Chinese government is a paper tiger that's all talk and no bite. Suck it, pseudo-fascist fifty cent army dengoids, Taiwan is a real country and the only legitimate China, cope and seethe.

[[File:Cball-Russia.png]] Russia [[File:Cball-Russia.png]]
Mattism believes that Russia's territorial expansions should, in absolutely zero way, be recognized. And, that all the lands stolen should be given back to their neighbors. And, he condemns the invasion of Ukraine, believing that this war must be a devastating defeat for  Putin, and all former territories prior to Ukrainian independence from the USSR must be given back. He supports the Russian opposition party to that of United Russia, being Russia of the Future. Along with this, he supports other opposition parties like the Russian United Democratic Party.

[[File:Cball-Ukraine.png]] Ukraine [[File:Cball-Ukraine.png]]
While Mattism obviously doesn't support Russia, as they are an oppressive  authoritarian conservative dictatorship, he also doesn't fully support  Ukraine either. As, both of our governments have common enemies that we should work together against, he also realizes that Ukraine suffers the same issues Russia does, as the government is an oligarchical state that doesn't care about worker rights, like a lot of post-soviet states. But, because Ukraine is fighting a defensive war imposed onto it by the Putin regime, he will support Ukraine against Russian expansion. With this, he's neutral on Ukrainian intermission into NATO, as that's what has kept Eastern Europe from falling into chaos like Ukraine after Putin invaded and has kept peace in the region, but at the same time, he sees NATO as another aggressor in the same way Putin's dictatorship is aswell. He holds this same stance with the European Union, as while both of these are preferable towards Putin's Russia, he sees Major powers budging in as the main issue that has caused all of these issues in the first place.

[[File:Cball-Belarus.png]] Belarus [[File:Cball-Belarus.png]]
Mattism sides with the Belarusian opposition parties, believing that  Lukashenko's government is not the legitimate ruling party of Belarus. And, is supportive of Sviatlana Tsikhanouskaya. As, the Belarusian people deserve fair and free elections, and a legitimate government. Not some Putin backed puppet dictatorship that doesn't have the best interest of the people's minds at heart. With all of this, he takes no position on Belarus joining the European Union. As, while holds that the European Union is preferable to Lukashenko's dictatorship, the economic union is still a neoliberal globalist empire, so that decision should be up to the people and people themselves, without any outside forces budging in to influence it. However, he still maintains the stance that Lukashenko has to go, as he's nothing but a corrupt despot that is a Putin puppet.

[[File:Cball-Hungary.png]] Hungary [[File:Cball-Hungary.png]]
Mattism is against the current ruling party of FIDESZ. As, it is slowly chipping away the remaining democracy Hungary has, and is a  Russian asset as well. He supports the sanctioning of Orban's government by the  European Union. As, Europe doesn't need any pointless infighting, and the current government of Hungary is destroying it's own country in the process. He supports the opposition coalition that oppose his government. And, would support a peaceful revolution by the opposition as well, as Hungary is in dire need of some political change to keep it from going down the destructive path it's going.

[[File:Cball-Iraq.png]] Iraq [[File:Cball-Iraq.png]]
Despite how bad Saddam Hussein was, the military invasion had no grounds for happening, wasted billions of tax payer dollars, completely failed at nation building and establishing a functioning  republic, and lead to the complete destabilization of the region which caused  ISIS to take control of the territory they did. He is against the invasion done by the neocons. He will support Rojava against  Ba'athists and  terrorists, ect.

[[File:Cball-Poland.png]] Poland [[File:Cball-Poland.png]]
The polish government needs to open up its government, stop its  corrupt, and destructive practices. He supports the opposition party to Law and Justice, being  Lewica. As, Poland doesn't need to go down the same fate  Hungary will go down if they don't stop. And, would support a peaceful revolution against the current Polish government by the opposition parties. So, I'm very much supportive of the European Parliament in sanctioning the current Polish government.

[[File:Cball-Greece.png]] Greece [[File:Cball-Greece.png]]
Mattism realizes that both the European Union and the  Greek government are at fault for the situation. As, the Greek government was corrupt as shit, and lied about its debt so it could get into the economic union. While, the Greek government was further indebted by bad loans given to it to try to bail it out. Overall, it is important that we help Greece out of their financial crisis, but oppose giving them any sort of bailouts.

[[File:Cball-Kosovo.png]] Kosovo [[File:Cball-Kosovo.png]]
Mattism supports Kosovo in their right to self-determination and independence. However, Kosovo would be better off integrating into  Albania, with the ethnic Serbian bits going to Serbia, and the rest going to Albania. As, it's very unlikely to get internationally recognized as an independent country, so that would be the second best outcome to achieve its independence from Serbia.

[[File:Cball-Syria.png]] Syria [[File:Cball-Syria.png]]
Mattism supports withdrawing most of our troops from Syria, and its related regions. We should focus on working together with other countries to defeat ISIS and other related terrorist groups in the region, as that should take priority first. Along with supporting the Kurdish rebels, as they deserve independence and the right to self-determination for everything they've been through in this conflict. Assad's regime must be opposed, as Assad has started this entire conflict, and is a corrupt and brutal dictator. Fighting the humanitarian crisis caused by the civil war and the displaced people's should also take priority as well, as the mass immigration of refugees from the Middle East has to stop.

[[File:Cball-Saudi.png]] Saudi Arabia [[File:Cball-Saudi.png]]
Mattism doesn't support allying ourselves with Saudi Arabia, a country with no records of human rights or political freedom. We shouldn't be cozying up to dictators who go against our own values because they have something to offer us, especially with what happened with the news reporters, funding terrorist groups, and stuff related to that.

[[File:Cball-Iran.png]] Iran [[File:Cball-Iran.png]]
Mattism supports the United States in working together with Iran were it is needed, like the  nuclear arms disarmament, but opposed in other Areas like their horrific human rights records. It is important that we maintain diplomatic relations with the Iranian government due to these reasons.

[[File:Cball-Afghanistan.png]] Afghanistan [[File:Cball-Afghanistan.png]]
While Mattism doesn't support the Taliban taking over Afghanistan, he supports the withdrawal of American troops from Afghanistan. Because, we were fighting an endless war we were never bound to win, that was costing us billions of dollars every year. We should've pulled out as soon as we got the guy we wanted. However, he doesn't support how president Biden withdrew troops from Afghanistan in the way that it happened. As, it wasn't carefully thought out, and we just ended up intervening in other places anyways. He would support a full withdrawal from these conflicts. Ideally, Afghanistan should have a democratic and  secular government to combat the Islamo fundies and other religious conflict in the region.

[[File:Cball-Yugoslavia.png]] Yugoslavia [[File:Cball-Yugoslavia.png]]
Mattism supports the military intervention in  Yugoslavia. As, it was a humanitarian intervention that was necessary to stop the ethnic genocide by  Serbian troops in  Kosovo.

[[File:Thailand.png]] Thailand [[File:Thailand.png]]
Mattism supports the anti-governmental protestors against the Thai monarchy. He believes the current government is not the legitimate government and hopes that the monarchy gets overthrown for a republic.

[[File:Cball-India.png]] India [[File:Cball-India.png]]
Mattism supports allying ourselves with India, but oppose Modi and other  radical hindu nationalists as well. As, the caste system in India's society has largely been shaped by the  religious influence in the country itself. India is an important player in world politics, and it is important to uphold democratic institutions within the country and  peace within the region.

[[File:Cball-Venezuela.png]] Venezuela [[File:Cball-Venezuela.png]]
Mattism doesn't support the current government of Venezuela, but also doesn't support the  United States meddling in the affairs of  Venezuela as well. We should try to amend the relations between our government and theirs while actively condemning the violence and everything else that has happened. Ideally, the rule of law and fair elections should be reestablished, and the current government should step down. He personally supports the opposition party towards the government Acción Democrática.

[[File:Cball-Libya.png]] Libya [[File:Cball-Libya.png]]
Mattism is against the intervention in Libya. Because, despite how bad Gaddafi was, it doesn't justify what the  neoconservatives did. As, going in and destabilizing the country further just replaced Gaddafi's regime with  terrorists groups.

[[File:Cball-North_Korea.png]] North Korea [[File:Cball-North_Korea.png]]
Mattism obviously doesn't like North Korea as a state, they are our foreign adversary. And, he considers the concept of Juche to have completely failed in its entirety, as it isn't even socialist in the modern day, just more closer to  state capitalism and  Third Positionism. So, North Korea is by most definitions, and failed state, and has no real right to exist on the geopolitical stage.

[[File:Cball-South_Korea.png]] South Korea [[File:Cball-South_Korea.png]]
Mattism would support South Korea in taking over  North Korea over this dispute, but that doesn't mean he support South Korea fully. As their society is his anti-thesis and rampant with corrupt oligarchical rule and is a late capitalist hell scape. So, South Korea as a government and as a society needs to greatly improve if they want his full unconditional support to take over the Korean Peninsula. But, given the choice next is a country that is a totalitarian hell hole which is a failed state with no respect for  human rights, he would choose the lesser evil in this instance.

[[File:Cball-Japan.png]] Japan [[File:Cball-Japan.png]]
Mattism, while liking a lot of the media that comes from this country, also realizes that its society and government are his anti-thesis in a lot of way. He is against the current Japanese government, as it is a lot of what he stands against. What Japan needs is a massive resurgence in labor unions to improve worker's rights in the country, among other left-wing reforms, as he realizes the working conditions in this country are far from good. The current party is just a neo-con imperialist party and is a one party dominant system, he supports the  social democratic party against the current ruling party. He will support Japan against forces like  China,  Russia, ect.

[[File:Castro.png]] Cuba [[File:Castro.png]]
Mattism, In spite of what he thinks of the Cuban government, thinks that the blockade against them is unjust, and should be lifted. However, the current government isn't some anti-imperialist baston either, it's just a brutal dictatorship that suppresses any personal rights of its citizens. And with this, he promptly sides with the cuban protesters. And, would support a revolution against the current Cuban government by the Cuban people, as they deserve a lot better than what they currently have. Not some authoritarian, corrupt, and brutal dictatorship. They deserve a democratic and fair government.

[[File:Zio.png]] Israel [[File:Zio.png]]
Mattism doesn't support Israel, their government needs to stop its brutal policies of neo-colonialism against the  Arabs. Along with dropping our international support for Israel, and stop giving them our tax paying dollars. As, the current government is strong enough on its own to fend for itself. But, he's not opposed to Israel existing as a state, as Israel has the right to self-determination, like all countries do. And, in all honesty, a part of him would prefer Israel over Palestine personally as it is a functioning western democracy that is secular with respect for western values, but ultimately refrains from taking a stand of being against or for Israel as Israel is an ethnostate that is committing crimes against humanity. He just wants to pull out of this region because It's not our fight to fight. We should be supporting Israel and Palestine together in peace deals that stabilize the region from further conflict.

[[File:Cball-Palestine.png]] Palestine [[File:Cball-Palestine.png]]
Mattism doesn't support Palestine, as their government needs to drop Hamas, and other terrorist organizations related to its government. As, the brutality shown by the Palestinian government is on par with that of Israeli government. As, he's not opposed to Palestine existing, but they need to drop their ethnic centrism down to  civic nationalism, like  Israel should. Ideally, both governments should collapse. And, in their place, a democratic government that is based on secular governance and  civic nationalism that is made for both Israelis and Palestinians. But, seeing as that's idealistic, he would support a two state solution with similar terms. As, Palestine should be allowed to peacefully co-exist with Israel, and have the right to self-determination.

Favorite quotes
“Anyone can deal with victory. Only the mighty can bear defeat.” - Adolf Hitler (He lost lmao)

“In twelve years from now, you will not recognize Berlin.” -  Adolf Hitler (He lost lmao)

"All you have to do is kick in the door and the whole rotten structure will crumble to the ground." - Adolf Hitler (He lost lmao)

"Altruism is a moral system which holds that man has no right to exist for his own sake, that service to others is the sole justification of his existence, and that self-sacrifice is his highest moral duty, value and virtue. This is the moral base of collectivism, of all dictatorships"

- Ayn Rand

"The purpose of morality is to teach you, not to suffer and die; but to enjoy yourself and live."

- Ayn Rand

"The question isn't who is going to let me; it's who is going to stop me."

- Ayn Rand

“the harder the conflict, the greater the triumph.” - George Washington

“Being all equal and independent, no one ought to harm another in his life, health, liberty, or possessions.” - John Locke

"The love for all living creatures is the most noble attribute of man." - Charles Darwin

“Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the universe.” - Albert Einstein

“Peace cannot be kept by force, it can only be achieved by understanding.” - Albert Einstein

“If a free society cannot help the many who are poor, it cannot save the few who are rich." - John Kennedy

“Mankind must put an end to war - or war will put an end to mankind." -  John Kennedy

“If by a "Liberal" they mean someone who looks ahead and not behind, someone who welcomes new ideas without rigid reactions, someone who cares about the welfare of the people-their health, their housing, their schools, their jobs, their civil rights and their civil liberties-someone who believes we can break through the stalemate and suspicions that grip us in our policies abroad, if that is what they mean by a "Liberal", then I'm proud to say I'm a "Liberal.” -  John Kennedy

"People hate politicians. And I can understand why." - Alexei Navalny

"I am not in politics for power. I am in it for justice." - Sviatlana Tsikhanouskaya

"Death to fascism, freedom for the people!" - Yugoslav Partisans

"The world will not accept dictatorship or domination." - Mikhail Gorbachev

"Contemporary social democracy is what I believe is the right concept." - Mikhail Gorbachev

“Peace is not unity in similarity but unity in diversity, in the comparison and conciliation of differences.” - Mikhail Gorbachev

"I'm for the poor man - all poor men, black and white, they all gotta have a chance. They gotta have a home, a job, and a decent education for their children. 'Every man a king' - that's my slogan." - Huey Long

“Capitalism is the astounding belief that the most wickedest of men will do the most wickedest of things for the greatest good of everyone.” - John Maynard Keynes

“The difficulty lies, not in the new ideas, but in escaping from the old ones.” - John Maynard Keynes

"Although it is not true that all conservatives are stupid people, it is true that most stupid people are conservative." - John Stuart Mill

"All silencing of discussion is an assumption of infallibility." - John Stuart Mill

"Whatever crushes individuality is despotism, by whatever name it may be called and whether it professes to be enforcing the will of God or the injunctions of men." - John Stuart Mill

"Pleasure and freedom from pain, are the only things desirable as ends." - John Stuart Mill

"So Long as we do not harm others we should be free to think, speak, act, & live as we see fit, without molestation from individuals, law, or gov't."

- John Stuart Mill

“Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then he is not omnipotent. Is he able, but not willing? Then he is malevolent. Is he both able and willing? Then whence cometh evil? Is he neither able nor willing? Then why call him God?”

- Epicurus

"Freedom and opportunity are precious gifts and the purpose of our politics is to expand them, for all our people."

- Ed Miliband

"While there's capitalism, there'll be socialism, because there is always a response to injustice."

- Ed Miliband

“America will never be destroyed from the outside. If we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves.” - Abraham Lincoln

“Those who deny freedom to others, deserve it not for themselves” -  Abraham Lincoln

“As President Franklin Delano Roosevelt reminded us: “The test of our progress is not whether we add more to the abundance of those who have much, it is whether we provide enough for those who have little.” - Bernie Sanders

“The American people are tired of Women.” - Bernie Sanders

"All tyrannies rule through fraud and force, but once the fraud is exposed they must rely exclusively on force." - George Orwell

"However much you deny the truth, the truth goes on existing." - George Orwell

“When one thinks of all the people who support or have supported Fascism, one stands amazed at their diversity. What a crew! Think of a programme which at any rate for a while could bring Hitler, Petain, Montagu Norman, Pavelitch, William Randolph Hearst, Streicher, Buchman, Ezra Pound, Juan March, Cocteau, Thyssen, Father Coughlin, the Mufti of Jerusalem, Arnold Lunn, Antonescu, Spengler, Beverley Nichols, Lady Houston, and Marinetti all into the same boat! But the clue is really very simple. They are all people with something to lose, or people who long for a hierarchical society and dread the prospect of a world of free and equal human beings. Behind all the ballyhoo that is talked about ‘godless’ Russia and the ‘materialism’ of the working class lies the simple intention of those with money or privileges to cling to them. Ditto, though it contains a partial truth, with all the talk about the worthlessness of social reconstruction not accompanied by a ‘change of heart’. The pious ones, from the Pope to the yogis of California, are great on the’ change of heart’, much more reassuring from their point of view than a change in the economic system.” - George Orwell

“The only thing we have to fear is fear itself.” - Franklin Roosevelt

“The liberty of a democracy is not safe if the people tolerated the growth of private power to a point where it becomes stronger than the democratic state itself. That in its essence is fascism: ownership of government by an individual, by a group, or any controlling private power.” - Franklin Roosevelt

“Democracy cannot succeed unless those who express their choice are prepared to choose wisely. The real safeguard of democracy, therefore, is education.” - Franklin Roosevelt

“In our hands is a placed power greater with their hoarded gold, greater than the might of armies magnified a thousand-fold. We can bring the birth the new world from the ashes of the old, for the union makes us strong.”

- Ralph Chaplin

“Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere.” - Martin Luther King Jr.

“We must live together as brothers or perish together as fools.” - Martin Luther King Jr.

“I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin but by the content of their character.” - Martin Luther King Jr.

"Ultimately, saying that you don't care about privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different from saying you don't care about freedom of speech because you have nothing to say." - Edward Snowden

“These programs were never about terrorism: they're about economic spying, social control, and diplomatic manipulation. They're about power.” - Edward Snowden

“Under observation, we act less free, which means we effectively are less free.” - Edward Snowden

"The true white man lives in his basement, jerks off to anime porn, and reads my books"

- Julius Evola

"We long to have a home where civil freedoms are respected, where our children will not be subject to mass surveillance, abuse of human rights, political censorship and mass incarceration." - Joshua Wong

"No country is free unless it is democratic." - Kemal Atatürk

How I would've voted in elections
American Elections =

1700s
1789 - George Washington

1792 - Thomas Jefferson

1796 - Thomas Jefferson

1800s
1800 - Thomas Jefferson

1804 - Thomas Jefferson

1808 - James Madison

1812 - James Madison

1816 - James Monroe

1820 - James Monroe

1824 - Andrew Jackson

1828 - Andrew Jackson

1832 - Andrew Jackson

1836 - Martin Van Buren

1840 - Martin Van Buren

1844 - James K. Polk

1848 -  Martin Van Buren

1852 - John P. Hale

1856 - John C. Frémont

1860 - Abraham Lincoln

1864 - Abraham Lincoln

1868 - Ulysses S. Grant

1872 - Horace Greeley

1876 - Rutherford B. Hayes

1880 - James A. Garfield

1884 - James G. Blaine

1888 - Benjamin Harrison

1892 - James B. Weaver

1896 - William McKinley

1900s
1900 - Theodore Roosevelt

1904 - Theodore Roosevelt

1908 - William Howard Taft

1912 - William Howard Taft

1916 - Charles Evans Hughes

1920 - James M. Cox

1924 - Calvin Coolidge

1928 - Herbert Hoover

1932 - Herbert Hoover

1936 - Franklin D. Roosevelt

1940 - Franklin D. Roosevelt

1944 - Franklin D. Roosevelt

1948 - Harry Truman

1952 - Adlai Stevenson

1956 - Adlai Stevenson

1960 - John F. Kennedy

1964 - Lyndon B. Johnson

1968 - Hubert Humphrey

1972 - George McGovern

1976 - Jimmy Carter

1980 - Jimmy Carter

1984 - Walter Mondale

1988 - Michael Dukakis

1992 - Bill Clinton

1996 - Bill Clinton

2000s
2000: Al Gore

2004: John Kerry

2008: Barrack Obama

2012: Barrack Obama

2016: Bernie Sanders (No one)

2020: Bernie Sanders (In the DNC)  Joe Biden (In the election) German Elections =

1800s
1871 - - LGGWA 1874 - - SAPD 1877 - - SAPD 1878 - - SAPD 1881 - - SAPD 1884 - - SAPD 1887 - - SAPD 1890 - - SPD 1893 - - SPD 1898 - - SPD

1900s
1901 - - SPD 1907 - - SPD 1912 - - SPD 1919 - - SDP 1920 - - SDP 1924 (May) - - SDP 1924 (December) - -  SDP 1928 - - SPD 1930 - - SPD 1932 (July) - - SPD 1932 (November) - - SPD 1933 (March) - - SPD 1947 - - SPD 1953 - - SPD 1957 - - SPD 1961 - - SPD 1965 - - SPD 1969 - - SPD 1972 - - SPD 1976 - - SPD 1980 - - SPD 1983 - - SPD 1987 - - SPD 1990 - - SPD 1994 - - SPD 1998 - - SPD

2000s
2002 - - SPD 2005 - - SPD 2007 - - SPD 2009 - - SPD 2013 - - SPD 2017 - - SPD 2021 - - SPD

Things I like
My favorite youtube channels =

[[File:YouTube.png]] Political Youtube channels [[File:YouTube.png]]

 * [[File:Soc-h.png]] Shaun


 * [[File:Socdem.png]] Shoe0nHead


 * [[File:Kraut.png]] Kraut


 * [[File:Thar.png]] Three Arrows


 * [[File:Fem.png]] Knowing Better


 * [[File:Antcent.png]] JrEg


 * [[File:World.png]] CaspianReport

[[File:YouTube.png]] Non-political Youtube channels [[File:YouTube.png]]

 * [[File:CGP_Grey.png]] CGP Grey


 * [[File:Eastoryball.png]] Eastory


 * [[File:CodyFrank.png]] AlternateHistoryHub


 * [[File:ArmchairHistoryBall.png]] The Armchair Historian


 * [[File:Cball-Russia.png]] NFKRZ


 * [[File:ISPball.png]] iSorrowproductions


 * [[File:Gamer.png]] Mountain General


 * [[File:Gamer.png]] Alex The Rambler!


 * [[File:Histval.png]] History Matters


 * [[File:Cball-Austria.png]] Tapakapa

Favorite Hoi4 Mods =
 * [[File:Histval.png]] Countryballs Explained

Favorite Hoi4 Mods

 * [[File:World.png]] Toolpack


 * [[File:Burgsys_icon.png]] The New Order: Last Days of Europe


 * [[File:Necon.png]] Cold War Iron Curtain: A World Divided


 * [[File:Avant-garde.png]] Red Flood


 * [[File:World.png]] Random Country Placement


 * [[File:World.png]] Novum Vexillum


 * [[File:Cball-GermanEmpire.png]] Kaiserredux


 * [[File:World.png]] Player-Led Peace Conferences


 * [[File:Nazi.png]] Thousand Week Reich

Rating Cities
City Relations =

Good

 * [[File:Cball-US.png]] Kansas City, Missouri - I've lived here the majority of my life, and while I do go in and out of the city often, I will still always cherish this city.
 * [[File:Cball-US.png]] St. Joseph, Missouri - I have family here, so I visit this city often. The city in of itself is bust however, as there's not a lot of activities to do here, and has a notable amount of homeless and gun violence from what I've seen. But, I've never had a notably bad experience from visiting this city. So, despite all of that, because I go here often, it gets put here.
 * [[File:Cball-US.png]] Lee's Summit, Missouri - I have had notably good experiences visiting here, as I can recall several of them.
 * [[File:Cball-US.png]] St. Louis, Missouri - Had a really fun time going on the arch. However, the city itself is in pretty dire shape from what I've seen, with having one of the highest crimes rates in the city. The city itself is pretty crud, but I did have a good experience going here where I went.
 * [[File:Cball-US.png]] San Francisco, California - Despite everything that goes on in California and this city, it was a pretty fun experience from what I had visiting it, and I would definitely go again.

Meh

 * [[File:Cball-US.png]] Denver, Colorado - I've been here several times, but it was never really interesting or boring, can't really recall a whole lot from the trips I've been to going to this city.
 * [[File:Cball-US.png]] Independence, Missouri - Nothing of note worthy ever happened here. But, I did visit it, so that's something, I guess. I would say it was ok.

Bad
Cities I would like to do go =
 * [[File:Cball-US.png]] Platte City, Missouri - One of my family members got mugged here lmao. While nothing of value was stolen (I think it was just like 50$ I dunno), that experience just ruined it entirely for me.

Europe

 * [[File:Cball-Russia.png]] Moscow, Russia
 * [[File:Cball-Russia.png]] Saint Petersburg, Russia
 * [[File:Cball-UK.png]] London, Britain
 * [[File:Cball-France.png]] Paris, France

Asia

 * [[File:Cball-Japan.png]] Tokyo, Japan
 * [[File:Cball-China.png]] Beijing, China
 * [[File:Cball-China.png]] Shanghai, China
 * [[File:Cball-China.png]] Hong Kong, China
 * [[File:Cball-Taiwan.png]] Taipei, Taiwan

Americas

 * [[File:Cball-Canada.png]] Toronto, Canada
 * [[File:Cball-Canada.png]] Vancouver, Canada
 * [[File:Cball-US.png]] New York, United States

Political Parties & Countries
Parties I would vote for = ==== (Note: Just because I would vote for these parties doesn't mean I agree with everything they espouse, they just happen to have the most ideological overlap with my beliefs, and some of these parties are banned parties) ====

[[File:Cball-US.png]] United States
Democratic Party
 * [[File:Dem-CPC.png]] Congressional Progressive Caucus

[[File:Cball-Germany.png]] Germany
SPD

[[File:Cball-Mexico.png]] Mexico
Partido de la Revolución Democrática

[[File:Polandball.png]] Poland
Lewica

[[File:Cball-Venezuela.png]] Venezuela
Alianza Democrática
 * [[File:Socdem.png]] Acción Democrática

[[File:Cball-Hungary.png]] Hungary
Magyar Szocialista Párt

[[File:Cball-France.png]] France
Parti socialiste

[[File:Cball-Japan.png]] Japan
Social Democratic Party of Japan

[[File:Cball-Sweden.png]] Sweden
Sveriges Socialdemokratiska Arbetareparti

[[File:Cball-Taiwan.png]] Republic of China
Pan-Green Coalition

[[File:Cball-UK.png]] United Kingdom
Labour Party
 * [[File:Onenatlab.png]] One Nation Labour

[[File:Cball-Kazakhstan.png]] Kazakhstan
Democratic Choice of Kazakhstan

[[File:Cball-Norway.png]] Norway
Arbeidarpartiet

[[File:Cball-Finland.png]] Finland
Suomen sosialidemokraattinen puolue

[[File:Cball-North_Korea.png]] North Korea
Free Joseon

[[File:Castro.png]] Cuba
Social Democratic Co-ordination of Cuba

[[File:Cball-South_Korea.png]] South Korea
Justice Party

[[File:Cball-HongKong.png]] Hong Kong
Pro-Democracy Camp
 * [[File:Socdem.png]] League of Social Democrats

[[File:Cball-China.png]] People's Republic of China
Democracy Party of China

[[File:Cball-Canada.png]] Canada
New Democratic Party

[[File:Cball-Russia.png]] Russia
Russia of the Future

[[File:Cball-Belarus.png]] Belarus
Anti-Lukashenko Parties
 * [[File:Socdem.png]] Belarusian Social Democratic Party

[[File:ROT.png]] Turkey
Republican People's Party Countries in need of change =

Countries will be ranked on their status, and the format goes like this: (Political structure, Economic Structure, and Social structure) ranging from these icons (NOTE, THIS IS A WIP)
//////

Based countries, little to no changes necessary

 * [[File:Cball-Denmark.png]] Denmark ([[File:Mega_Yes-icon.png]]/[[File:Mega_Yes-icon.png]]/[[File:Mega_Yes-icon.png]])
 * [[File:Cball-Sweden.png]] Sweden ([[File:Mega_Yes-icon.png]]/[[File:Mega_Yes-icon.png]]/[[File:Mega_Yes-icon.png]])
 * [[File:Cball-Norway.png]] Norway ([[File:Mega_Yes-icon.png]]/[[File:Mega_Yes-icon.png]]/[[File:Mega_Yes-icon.png]])
 * [[File:Cball-Iceland.png]] Iceland ([[File:Mega_Yes-icon.png]]/[[File:Mega_Yes-icon.png]]/[[File:Mega_Yes-icon.png]])
 * [[File:Cball-Finland.png]] Finland ([[File:Mega_Yes-icon.png]]/[[File:Mega_Yes-icon.png]]/[[File:Mega_Yes-icon.png]])
 * [[File:Cball-Switzerland.png]] Switzerland ([[File:Mega_Yes-icon.png]]/[[File:Kinda Yes-icon.png]]/[[File:Mega_Yes-icon.png]])
 * [[File:Cball-Austria.png]] Austria ([[File:Mega_Yes-icon.png]]/[[File:Mega_Yes-icon.png]]/[[File:Mega_Yes-icon.png]])
 * [[File:Cball-Germany.png]] Germany ([[File:Mega_Yes-icon.png]]/[[File:Mega_Yes-icon.png]]/[[File:Mega_Yes-icon.png]])
 * [[File:Cball-Netherlands.png]] Netherlands ([[File:Mega_Yes-icon.png]]/[[File:Mega_Yes-icon.png]]/[[File:Mega_Yes-icon.png]])
 * [[File:Cball-Canada.png]] Canada ([[File:Kinda Yes-icon.png]]/[[File:Kinda Yes-icon.png]]/[[File:Mega_Yes-icon.png]])
 * [[File:Cball-Belgium.png]] Belgium ([[File:Mega_Yes-icon.png]]/[[File:Mega_Yes-icon.png]]/[[File:Mega_Yes-icon.png]])
 * [[File:Cball-Czechia.png]] Czechia ([[File:Mega_Yes-icon.png]]/[[File:Yes-icon.png]]/[[File:Mega_Yes-icon.png]])
 * [[File:Cball-Ireland.png]] Ireland ([[File:Mega_Yes-icon.png]]/[[File:Mega_Yes-icon.png]]/[[File:Mega_Yes-icon.png]])
 * [[File:Cball-France.png]] France ([[File:Mega_Yes-icon.png]]/[[File:Mega_Yes-icon.png]]/[[File:Mega_Yes-icon.png]])
 * [[File:Cball-Spain.png]] Spain ([[File:Kinda Yes-icon.png]]/[[File:Mega_Yes-icon.png]]/[[File:Mega_Yes-icon.png]])

Good, in need of a few tweaks

 * [[File:Cball-Newz.png]] New Zealand
 * [[File:Cball-Uruguay.png]] Uruguay ([[File:Mega_Yes-icon.png]]/[[File:Kinda Yes-icon.png]]/[[File:Mega_Yes-icon.png]])
 * [[File:Cball-Australia.png]] Australia
 * [[File:Cball-Taiwan.png]] Taiwan ([[File:Yes-icon.png]]/[[File:Kinda Yes-icon.png]]/[[File:Mega_Yes-icon.png]])

Ok, but in need of reform

 * [[File:Cball-US.png]] United States ([[File:Kinda No-icon.png]]/[[File:Kinda No-icon.png]]/[[File:Yes-icon.png]])
 * [[File:Cball-Chile.png]] Chile
 * [[File:Cball-UK.png]] United Kingdom ([[File:Kinda No-icon.png]]/[[File:Kinda Yes-icon.png]]/[[File:Yes-icon.png]])

Bad, in need of noticeable reform

 * [[File:Cball-Japan.png]] Japan ([[File:No-icon.png]]/[[File:Kinda No-icon.png]]/[[File:No-icon.png]])
 * [[File:Cball-South_Korea.png]] South Korea ([[File:No-icon.png]]/[[File:Kinda No-icon.png]]/[[File:No-icon.png]])
 * [[File:Cball-Ukraine.png]] Ukraine ([[File:No-icon.png]]/[[File:No-icon.png]]/[[File:No-icon.png]])
 * [[File:Cball-Poland.png]] Poland ([[File:No-icon.png]]/[[File:Yes-icon.png]]/[[File:No-icon.png]])
 * [[File:Cball-Hungary.png]] Hungary ([[File:No-icon.png]]/[[File:Kinda No-icon.png]]/[[File:No-icon.png]])
 * [[File:Cball-Italy.png]] Italy ([[File:No-icon.png]]/[[File:No-icon.png]]/[[File:No-icon.png]])
 * [[File:Cball-Singapore.png]] Singapore ([[File:No-icon.png]]/[[File:Yes-icon.png]]/[[File:No-icon.png]])
 * [[File:Cball-Mexico.png]] Mexico ([[File:No-icon.png]]/[[File:No-icon.png]]/[[File:No-icon.png]])

Terrible, burn the entire system to the ground and start from new

 * [[File:Cball-Russia.png]] Russia ([[File:Mega No-icon.png]]/[[File:Mega No-icon.png]]/[[File:Mega No-icon.png]])
 * [[File:Cball-North_Korea.png]] North Korea ([[File:Mega No-icon.png]]/[[File:Mega No-icon.png]]/[[File:Mega No-icon.png]])
 * [[File:Zio.png]] Israel ([[File:Mega No-icon.png]]/[[File:Kinda No-icon.png]]/[[File:Yes-icon.png]])
 * [[File:Cball-Palestine.png]] Palestine ([[File:Mega No-icon.png]]/[[File:Mega No-icon.png]]/[[File:Mega No-icon.png]])
 * [[File:Cball-Iran.png]] Iran ([[File:Mega No-icon.png]]/[[File:Mega No-icon.png]]/[[File:Mega No-icon.png]])
 * [[File:Cball-Brazil.png]] Brazil ([[File:No-icon.png]]/[[File:Mega No-icon.png]]/[[File:Mega No-icon.png]])
 * [[File:Cball-Belarus.png]] Belarus ([[File:Mega No-icon.png]]/[[File:Yes-icon.png]]/[[File:Mega No-icon.png]])
 * [[File:Cball-China.png]] People's Republic of China ([[File:Mega No-icon.png]]/[[File:Mega No-icon.png]]/[[File:Mega No-icon.png]])
 * [[File:Cball-Taliban.png]] Afghanistan ([[File:Mega No-icon.png]]/[[File:Mega No-icon.png]]/[[File:Mega No-icon.png]])
 * [[File:Castro.png]] Cuba ([[File:Mega No-icon.png]]/[[File:Kinda No-icon.png]]/[[File:No-icon.png]])
 * [[File:Cball-Saudi.png]] Saudi Arabia ([[File:Mega No-icon.png]]/[[File:Mega No-icon.png]]/[[File:Mega No-icon.png]])
 * [[File:Chavismo.png]] Venezuela
 * [[File:ROT.png]] Turkey ([[File:No-icon.png]]/[[File:Kinda No-icon.png]]/[[File:Mega No-icon.png]])
 * [[File:Cball-Kazakhstan.png]] Kazakhstan ([[File:Mega No-icon.png]]/[[File:Mega No-icon.png]]/[[File:Mega No-icon.png]])
 * [[File:Cball-AfricanUnion.png]] A lot of Africa
 * [[File:Thailand.png]] Thailand
 * [[File:Cball-Turkmenistan.png]] Turkmenistan ([[File:Mega No-icon.png]]/[[File:Mega No-icon.png]]/[[File:Mega No-icon.png]])
 * [[File:Cball-Ethiopia.png]] Ethiopia
 * [[File:Cball-Somalia.png]] Somalia
 * [[File:Cball-Egypt.png]] Egypt
 * [[File:Cball-Myanmar.png]] Myammar

Positive

 * [[File:NDP icon.png]] New Democratic Party - Pretty typical socdem party, so you know what I'm about to say right now, A B S O L U T E L Y B A S E D!
 * [[File:USA_PirateParty.png]] United States Pirate Party - Absolutely based, and chad. Like, how is it even this possible to each this level of based?
 * [[File:Dem-CPC.png]] Congressional Progressive Caucus - One of the truly based parties in the United States, It's ashamed the establishment actively works against your causes. However, focuses a lot on this meaningless culture war a bit too much, which is understandable, but still. Outside of that, you're basically based.
 * [[File:ForwardParty.png]] American Forward Party - Well I may have disagreements, I still respect you as a political party. Yang is kinda meh however.

Neutral

 * [[File:Demcr.png]] Democratic Party - I seriously cannot believe I have to work with this party. The only tolerable faction within this party is the progressive caucus. All other wings are moderately to severely cringe. With having most of the criticisms I have for the republican party.
 * [[File:GreensUS.png]] Green Party USA - I honestly don't know much about your party or its members, but you seem to be slightly more tolerable. Although, full out socialism is not desirable, and your social policies are too far left.

Negative

 * [[File:RepubUS.png]] Republican Party - Fuck off, just because I hate the establishment doesn't mean I like you. You are my anti-thesis. Corporate welfare, ever increasing statism with disregard for civil liberties, foreign interventionism, isolationism, and free-market capitalism. Everything, and I mean EVERYTHING, is just awful.
 * [[File:USASolidarity.png]] American Solidarity Party - SO GOOD! YET, SO BAD! We practically agree on everything with economics, which is epic! But, basically everything else here is a very hard NOPE from me, absolutely abhorrent social policies, there's almost nothing i can get behind here.
 * [[File:USLibertarians.png]] Libertarian Party - Based social views, but that's pretty much it. Pretty much nothing good, and many of you guys are just republicans who want to do drugs. You would single handedly crash the US economy if you ever got into power.
 * [[File:Dsa.png]] Democratic Socialists of America - What a bunch of radlibs, more obsessed with pointless culture war nonsense than economics.
 * [[File:Fuente.png]] America First - Nick Fuentes is a Neo-Nazi, and, funnily enough, is not even white.
 * [[File:Rockwell.png]] American Nazi Party - Neo-Nazis are absolute clowns.
 * [[File:Constitution_Party_(US).png]] Constitution Party - Unhinged social conservatism and fiscal conservatism, literally my political opposite.
 * [[File:Castro.png]] Communist Party of Cuba - Any American that supports you is a complete lolcow, have fun living in a country that doesn't respect human rights compared to the United States.

Positive

 * [[File:Nordmodel.png]] Sveriges Socialdemokratiska Arbetareparti - Thanks for being one the main inspirations! And, the ideology is pretty based.
 * [[File:Lewica.png]] Lewica - Not the best, but better than the current Polish government.

Neutral

 * [[File:UKLab.png]] Labour Party - The soft left is good, every other faction basically sucks.
 * [[File:Demsocstar.png]] Die Linke - Based left-wing populist and opposition towards the EU's neoliberal policies, everything else here isn't good though. And, from what I've read, you have pretty unrealistic fiscal policies as well.

Negative

 * [[File:Wagenknecht.png]] Aufstehen - Take anything remotely good about Die Linke, remove it, and you get this. Russophilic party that is socially conservative, lmao. Basically, standard old leftist.

Positive

 * [[File:Socdem.png]] Social Democratic Party of Japan - The best party Japanese politics has to offer. And, pretty based as well.
 * [[File:Synclib.png]] Constitutional Democratic Party of Japan - A bit moderate, but ehh... Preferable to the LDP.
 * [[File:PanGreenTW.png]] Pan-Green Coalition - Keep standing up for Taiwanese independence, full and critical support goes to you!
 * [[File:JusticeParty.png]] Justice Party - Pretty based for South Korea, shame left-wing politics aren't too popular there.
 * [[File:Cball-HongKong-BlackBauhinia.png]] Pro-Democracy Camp - I will wholeheartedly support you against the CCP.
 * [[File:Liberal Democracy.png]] Democracy Party of China - Imagine if the protestors succeeded... What only could've been. Shame brainwashed 50 cent army retards keep twisting the facts and sucking the dick of the Chinese Communist Party.
 * [[File:Socdem.png]] Belarusian Social Democratic Party - Lukashenko is a corrupt dictator and Putin puppet, keep protesting!
 * [[File:RussiaOfTheFuture.png]] Russia of the Future - Keep exposing the truth about Russia United, I have faith you can overthrow the Russian government!

Neutral

 * [[File:JapCom.png]] Japanese Communist Party - Social progressivism is cool, everything else is cringe. It does surprise me how Japan has such an active socialist party in their politics given their politics of the country though.

Negative

 * [[File:LDP(Japan).png]] Liberal Democratic Party of Japan - Neocon dick sucking neo-imperialist party.
 * [[File:PeoplePowerParty.png]] People's Power Party -
 * [[File:Dengf.png]] Chinese Communist Party - The amount of leftists who support you just because you oppose atlanticism is astounding, and aren't actually leftists if they do.
 * [[File:NeoShowa.png]] Nippon Kaigi - Neo-nazi cult, do I need to say more?

How to Draw
MyFlagUpdatedMatt.png
 * 1) Draw a ball.
 * 2) Fill the backround with blue.
 * 3) Draw a red cross with white outlines.
 * 4) Draw a red circle in the middle.
 * 5) Draw a rose in the middle of the red circle.
 * 6) Draw the eyes.

You're done!

Ideological Relations
(Note: If you want to add me to your page using ideological icons, use these: (//) Ideological Relations=

Based

 * [[File:ClassicalSocDem.png]] Classical Social Democracy - Post-WW2 socdems were based and redpilled. You are the true social democracy, it's an honest to god shame what your ideology has become in the modern day. However, I'm not interested in establishing socialism.


 * [[File:MilkTeaAlliance.png]] Milk Teaism - Keep fighting for democracy and human rights in your retrospective countries, may democracy and freedom prevail!


 * [[File:Left-wingCon.png]] Old Leftism - Depends on your social views, the old leftists I've come to meet have been really hit or miss. Some have been pretty based and represent my own personal views closely, the other ones are conservatives who oppose wokeness cuz "muh degeneracy and moral values!1!1!1". So long as you are socially liberal, you're fine.


 * [[File:3princ.png]] Three Prinicples of the People - Depends, Sun Yat-sen and Chiang Ching-kuo are based, but some of you guys are CCP bootlickers and like children.


 * [[File:Lpop.png]] Dirtbag Leftism - You're alright, and the closest thing I identify with.


 * [[File:Nordcon.png]] Nordic Conservatism - Largely my cultural model. Nordic Countries are chad af, especially Denmark.


 * [[File:Apolit.png]] Apoliticism - You know, I've grown so much respect for this over the time I've had to endure being in these poltiical communities. You can really only hear the same white nationalist/neo-nazi (larp) fantasy over and over again until you realize that maybe it was a bit of a mistake to begin with. Besides, this shit just stresses me out for no real reason, I just want to be left alone to my own desires, but I've gone too far to give up on everything just yet, so.


 * [[File:Anime.png]] Anime - Y'know, I don't watch a whole lot of you anymore because I've largely moved on to other things like hearts of iron 4. But, you will still always have a special place in my heart for getting me through so much rough times in my life.


 * [[File:LibSocDemIcon.png]] Libertarian Social Democracy - My left-libertarian counterpart, pretty based. This would be, but I'm not fond of anti-statism, I see it as unrealistic. But, you're more respectful towards civil liberties and non-interventionist unlike some of your modern day counter-parts.


 * [[File:Horshu.png]] Horseshoe Centrism - Totalitarian communism and totalitarian fascism are the same evils, never forget the horror these ideologies have caused.


 * [[File:Modprog.png]] Moderate Progressivism - Progressive who accounts for SOME traditions that are legitimately beneficial.


 * [[File:Progconf.png]] Progressive Conservatism - Reject meaningless culture war.


 * [[File:DenmarkSocdem.png]] Danish Social Democracy - Denmark is chad af, take examples from this everyone.


 * [[File:LeftSocdem.png]] Left-Social Democracy - You're my preferred choice when in engaging with politics, and are the true social democracy. Shame third way neoliberals have token over all the center-left parties.


 * [[FIle:Onenatlab.png]] One-Nation Labourism - My based and redpilled british counterpart, Ed Miliband is based, but Keith Starmer is dog water. Better than the Tories, but still sucks and is a third-way neoliberal.


 * [[File:Panscan.png]] Pan-Nordicism - Words cannot describe how sexy this is.


 * [[File:Sexocracy.png]] - Just gonna put this here :)


 * [[FIle:USAProg.png]] Vermont Progressivism - Were I got my original inspiration when going down my political journey.


 * [[File:Classprog.png]] Classical Progressivism - I get so much inspiration from this time period. It's a form of progressivism I really like! Social and economic progressivism without the intersectional idpol stuff is based.


 * [[File:CultLib.png]] Cultural Liberalism - You can be a cultural liberal and against woke culture. Just because I oppose preachy idpol bullshit doesn't make me right-wing like some people claim it does.


 * [[File:Nordmodel.png]] Nordic Model - Based and nordicpilled.


 * [[File:Libeugen.png]] Liberal Eugenicism - Eugenics without the racism and genocide is good. Shame the Nazis had to ruin the name of this, now everyone associates it things like Aktion T4 and other nazi programs.


 * [[File:Lib.png]] Liberalism - Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness! But, you do have some flaws, namely being, representative democracy. But, outside of that, individual liberty and rights are based.


 * [[File:Pac.png]] Mh:polcompballanarchy:Pacifism - No more shall we waste billions of dollars in pointless interventions.


 * [[File:Socgeo.png]] Social Georgism - Collective ownership of land is very based.


 * [[File:Scientocracy Small.png]] Scientocracy - It's important we use fact-based policies for public policy making, the rise of anti-intellectualism in our political discourse is quite frankly concerning and needs to be countered.


 * [[File:Socfem.png]] Social Feminism - Women uphold half the sky, so it's natural that both sexes would be equal.


 * [[File:Humanismpix.png]] Humanism - You carry my ideas nicely.


 * [[File:ACLU.png]] American Civil Liberties Union - A group that has largely influenced my cultural views. What more is there to say?


 * [[File:Protect.png]] Protectionism - Outsourcing all of our jobs to developing countries has been disastrous on the US economy.


 * [[File:Globnat.png]] Alter-Globalization - Globalization without globalization? Based!


 * [[File:Modnat.png]] Patriotism - Liking your country doesn't equal fascism.


 * [[File:Civnat.png]] Civic Nationalism - The most tolerable form of nationalism to exist.


 * [[File:Natprog.png]] National Progressivism - Basically me, but I'm really only a nationalist in trade and against neoliberal style globalization.


 * [[File:Internation.png]] Internationalism - Based, but please be wary of economic globalization and militaristic interventionism! Other than that, when you're paired with pacifism, you're a good foreign policy.


 * [[File:SocDemCorp.png]] Social Democratic Corporatism - My economic model, very based.


 * [[File:Secular.png]] Secularism - Based, religion should play no role in our government.


 * [[File:Reform.png]] Reformism - The best way to achieve political change in the case of liberal democracy.


 * [[File:Intercult.png]] Interculturalism - Pretty based, we need unity for our country.


 * [[File:RadicalLeft.png]] Radical Leftism - Yeah, I'm a radlib, is that a problem?


 * [[File:Dem.png]] Democracy - Good system, but representative democracy is outdated, better than most dictatorships.


 * [[File:Statecap.png]] State Capitalism - I know you're often used as a pejorative term, but the actual economics are not bad. Be less centralized through, and you'd be basically perfect.


 * [[File:Marketsoc.png]] Market Socialism - I'm skeptical of you, but you're alright.


 * [[File:Leftnat.png]] Left-Wing Nationalism - Left-wing ideals and nationalism, based.


 * [[File:Soccap.png]] Social Capitalism - Shame you're not the dominate form of capitalism, you're capitalism but done right compared to the neoliberal model.


 * [[File:Laicism.png]] Laicism - While you do go too far, as I'm not a massive fan of banning freedom of speech and expression, I will 100% support you against Islam in France.


 * [[File:Regulationism.png]] Regulationism - Necessary so capitalism doesn't destroy the environment or become unethical.


 * [[File:Utility.png]] Mh:polcompball:Utilitarianism - Happiness is the most accurate measure of morality.

Kinda Based

 * [[File:Socdem.png]] Social Democracy - My ideology. Sadly, you've fallen from grace in your modern day parties. Some of you guys are good, but a lot of them are just neolibs in denial who serve the establishment.


 * [[File:LeftBert.png]] Left-Libertarianism - I vaguely align with this, as I literally land here on the political compass, but many of your followers are neck deep into woke preachy idpol bullshit which helps no one. Also, stop claiming to support free-speech expect when it's "hateful", as I have the personal freedom to offend anyone I want, as It's my freedom to do such. Get rid of all these specific issues, and you're fine.


 * [[File:Cap.png]] Capitalism - Depends on how your largely implemented, free market capitalism is cringe but social capitalism is based


 * [[File:Socliber.png]] Social Libertarianism - Most tolerable libertarian.


 * [[File:Bhl.png]] Bleeding-Heart Libertarianism - A bit woke, but won't bug me when I'm trying to jerk off, so I guess you're ok...


 * [[File:Clib.png]] Classical Liberalism - Without you, my ideology would've never come to existence. But, you're quite antiquated in the modern day. But, without the enlightenment, none of this would've been possible.


 * [[File:Libsoc.png]] Libertarian Socialism - You're quite interesting, and I like your model of governance. But, socialism still isn't desirable to implement. But, you have to be one of the best anti-statist ideologies. I would prefer to live under this than a right-libertarian society. However, please rely less on planning and more on markets. And, stop being so revolutionary please.


 * [[File:Orlib.png]] Ordo-Liberalism - You're pretty okay, I'll give you that, the German market economy was based.


 * [[File:Thar.png]] Anti-Authoritarianism - Yes, authoritarianism sucks, but for the love of god stop opposing the *GOOD* dictators that have existed and have been progressive forces throughout history, PLEASE! We both understand the need for civil liberties and opposing genocidal dictators who oppress their people, but "less auth = less bad!1!1!!" is not an accurate way of measuring how good or bad a leader is.


 * [[File:Georgist.png]] Georgism - Nice ideas, but single-tax is a bad idea and free-trade is cringe. Free cats are based :3

Neutral

 * [[File:Soc.png]] Socialism - I'm sorry but this will never work.


 * [[File:Dsa.png]] Democratic Socialism - Some of you guys are ok, but a lot of you guys are identity obsessed as well.


 * [[File:Socauth.png]] Social Authoritarianism - Meh. Your variants throughout history have been progressive forces for good, but your modern day adherents like Lukashenko and Gaddafi are cringe. I would support this in a country that is going through economic development to reach the point in were it can transition into a democracy, but you're really only good for a transitional stage, and nothing else.


 * [[File:Macron.png]] Macronism - Cringe neolib but based standing up to Islam in your country. I would've voted for you over Le Pen if I had to because her social policies are just too much disagreement


 * [[File:Soclib.png]] Social Liberalism - Your historical figures are based and chad, your modern day figures are a serious mixed bag, with a lot of them just being third way neolibs.


 * [[File:Anin.png]] Anarcho-Individualism - BECOME UNGOVERNABLE! But seriously, one of the most agreeable anarchist ideologies. But, you take individualism and libertarianism way too far. Also not a fan of this cultural abolitionism stuff, but overall, ok.


 * [[File:Anfem.png]] Anarcha-Feminism - You're kinda weird, but whatever. So long as you're not into the idpol stuff, you're ok. Not a fan of abolitionism though.


 * [[File:Natan.png]] National Anarchism - Anarchist that rejects multiculturalism and anti-nationalism is good, but everything else is pure garbage, and anarcho-nazbol is pure larp.


 * [[File:Angeo.png]] Geoanarchism - Based for an anarchist, that's about it.


 * [[File:Anpostleft.png]] Post-Left Anarchism - Meh...


 * [[File:ClassDistr.png]] Classical Distributism - Based economics, but your social views are barf worthy.


 * [[File:Natlib.png]] National Libertarianism - Libertarian that rejects globalism is based, but I'm unsure about some of your followers. Also, don't be isolationist please.


 * [[File:Ego.png]] Egoism - I should be the controller of my own body and life choices from all governing authorities, but nihilism and disregarding morality is cringe for me.


 * [[File:Conmon.png]] Constitutional Monarchism - I don't really like the idea of monarchs, nor do I personally support one. But, I also don't really care if a country has one or not, nor would I cry if it ever got abolished for the same reason.


 * [[File:IdealismPhil.png]] Idealism - Not gonna lie, I am sympathetic towards you, as I believe having strong ideals and moral reasoning above pragmaticism does go together with hedonism quite nicely. So, it would only make sense to adopt this as a philosophy, however, utilitarianism is more useful for me ngl.


 * [[File:Nalib.png]] National Liberalism - Based lib that rejects globalism, wokeness, and babying Islam like it's some untouchable thing and opposes the islamification of Europe. But hating arabs is cringe and some of you guys are retarded, like supporting Britian leaving the European Union, brexit was an idiotic move that caused way more issues than it solved, bruh. Also, economic globalization is cringe as well. Also, people like Sargon are idiots lmao.


 * [[File:SecSat.png]] Atheistic Satanism - Edginess aside, this is a rather good philosophy that I can agree with on its surface, but this whole symbolic Satanism stuff is larp and cringe, I just cannot get behind it. at least we both love the anti-christ


 * [[File:Technocracy.png]] Rationalism - I should really not be this conflicted on my own moral ideals, but it is really hard to pick a philosophy that maximizes the usefulness of it. I would rather put my own needs above forms of rationality.


 * [[File:Existentialism.png]] Existentialism - I really do not like the idea of free will, moral subjectivity is whatever to me though. I am considering this...


 * [[File:Long.png]] Longism - You were based for your time, but that corruption and authoritarianism wasn't.


 * [[File:Prog-u.png]] Progressivism - Better than most modern conservatives, but realize that your approach to societal reform isn't good.


 * [[File:Sorelia.png]] National Syndicalism - The name sounds good, but the actual ideology is everything I flat out do not agree with. If it was just syndicalism with nationalism it would be ok, but remove all the reactionary elements from this.


 * [[File:Gay.png]] LGBT Community - As an individualist, who am I to limit the freedom of other people when they aren't personally bugging me? But pride stuff is cringe for me in the same way homophobia is cringe.


 * [[File:Corptism.png]] State Corporatism - It's complicated.


 * [[File:Glibr.png]] Green Libertarianism - Libertarianism is really cringe, but environmentalism is mega based. But, a free-market capitalist society would ultimately favor the economy over the environment.


 * [[File:Demcon.png]] Democratic Confederalism - I support you against your foreign aggressors, but some of your variants are sus to say the least.


 * [[File:Patcon.png]] Paternalistic Conservatism - Same thing as above. Would be flat out everything I'm opposed to if it wasn't for the welfare shit. Even then, the social collectivism makes me question if this is even worth putting here.


 * [[File:WelfChauvin.png]] Welfare Chauvinism - You're an ok concept, and Europe kinda needs you because what the EU did pouring millions of poor economic immigrants into their countries. But holy shit, chill out with the identitarianism and racism, welfare should be given to people based on citizenship, not race or ethnicity.


 * [[File:Eugen.png]] Eugenicism - Have you been too vilified throughout history? Yes, you have. Don't get me wrong, Nazi eugenics are evil, I shouldn't have to explain why I'm fundamentally opposed to such, but a more liberal version of you that isn't forced would be actually ideal, and can be used to reduce the suffering within society.


 * [[File:Isolation.png]] Isolationism - As a military policy, you're based, we shouldn't waste our foreign resources fighting forever wars. However, as a diplomatic policy, you're less desirable, I prefer non-interventionist internationalism.


 * [[File:Cultural_Nationalism.png]] Cultural Nationalism - You're needed in places like Europe, but you're too exclusionary to foreigners and native minorities.

Cringe

 * [[File:Conserv.png]] Conservatism - Modern day conservatism is a complete joke lmao. Tell me a single thing modern day conservatism has conserved? With the complete ideological contradictions of this ideology in the modern day, I'm quite frankly surprised anyone takes this seriously at all.


 * [[File:Fiscon.png]] Fiscal Conservatism - I understand fiscal responsibility is needed for any government, but welfare programs are needed for the betterment of society.


 * [[File:USASolidarity.png]] American Solidarianism - Just republicans without shitty foreign and economic policies. I hope this dumpsterfire you call a "political party" never takes off and gets any ground.


 * [[File:Multicult.png]] Multiculturalism - You don't work in any country you are placed in, and push pointless identity politics onto people.


 * [[File:RepubUS.png]] Republican Party - There's basically nothing good about you.


 * [[File:Demcr.png]] Democratic Party - Everything I could've mentioned above, but slightly less worse.


 * [[File:Confem.png]] Conservative Feminism - How can you claim to care about women rights?


 * [[File:RightSocDem.png]] Right-Social Democracy - It's a shame I'm forced to be this in realpolitik, you're not social democracy, you've ruined the name of what social democracy means.


 * [[File:Rpop-tinfoilhat.png]] Right-Wing Populism - "Um actually, the world is controlled by a group of homosexual liberal elitist jews who are using mass immigration to undermine our white heritage, and climate change is a hoax" 🤓🤓🤓 But in all seriouesness, you are a menace to any society you are placed in. I wouldn't be lying if I said I was sympathetic towards your leaders like Le Pen, left-wing populists could learn some things from right-wing populists.


 * [[File:Nihil.png]] Nihilism - Why though?


 * [[File:Consocf.png]] Conservative Socialism - One of the only things we really agree on is the state of the modern left, but for different reasons ofc. Also, stop flirting with tankies and dengists, the amount of russophilia consocs I've seen.


 * [[File:Mansphere.png]] Manosphere - Get a life and some friends.


 * [[File:Libertarian.png]] Libertarianism - A libertarian would let me die on the street without any second glance, but at least they would also let me fuck bitches and do coke so.


 * [[File:Community.png]] Communitarianism - Communitarian economics are based, that's about it unfortunately.


 * [[File:Catheo.png]] Catholic Social Teaching - Neoliberal society were my individualism is respected would be better than this.


 * [[File:Cdem.png]] Christian Democracy - No.


 * [[File:Christsoc.png]] Christian Socialism - Fuck your moral values.


 * [[File:Paleolib.png]] Paleolibertarianism - A conservative that likes watching child porn, no.


 * [[File:Conlib.png]] Conservative Liberalism - A liberal that opposes wokeness is based, but conservatism is yuck.


 * [[File:European_Federalism.png]] European Federalism - Eurofeds are cancer, the fundamental idea of a pan-european alliance like the EU isn't bad a bad idea, but the EU in is current state is a globalist neoliberal empire. True social democrats should not support the EU in its current state, it literally works against everything social democracy stands for, they should've stood against globalization after the 2008 financial crisis.


 * [[File:Libfem.png]] Liberal Feminism - How are war crimes any different if women are committing them?


 * [[File:Minarchist.png]] Minarchism - Limited government not interferring in the daily lives of people is based, but economic individualism is cringe.


 * [[File:Ormarxf.png]] Marxism - We may agree on some things, but communism has still shown to ultimately fail each time it has been tried.


 * [[File:Altl.png]] Alt-Lite - I fucking hate my past so fucking much it makes me cringe beyond any reasonable doubt looking back after watching anti-sjw videos and becoming an illiterate bozo who bought into the same identity politic obsessed anti-sjw. No go away, edgy child.


 * [[File:Awaj.png]] Anarchism - Unless there is something that stands out about one of your variants, you get put here.


 * [[File:Acol.png]] Anarcho-Collectivism - I don't want to partake in your society.


 * [[File:Ancom.png]] Anarcho-Communism - Not only is this ideology dog water, but many of your followers are obsessed with woke baizuo idpol shit. Collectivism taken to this extreme would not result in freedom or liberation for anyone, it would result in tyranny by mob rule instead of the government.


 * [[File:Pinkcap.png]] Pink Capitalism - Intersectional free-market neoliberal capitalism = 🤮🤮🤮🤮 (at least he'll leave me alone when I'm enjoying myself)


 * [[File:Antifa.png]] Antifa - Modern day Antifa is a woke joke, Anti-fascist partisans would kill themselves if they saw modern day antifa and what its currently doing. You've turned politics into a religion, and silence anyone who doesn't agree with you, please do something better with your time.


 * [[File:Luxem.png]] Luxemburgism - Skill issue. [[File:Troll.png]]


 * [[File:Mutalist.png]] Mutualism - Thief.

Eat Shit and KYS now

 * [[File:Fash.png]] Fascism - The problem with fascism as a political ideology is that you eventually run out of being 13 years old.


 * [[File:Atlanticism.png]] Atlanticism & [[File:Euras.png]] Fourth Theory - "Um. aksually, muh imperialism is better than your imperialism!"


 * [[File:Neobert.png]] Neo-Libertarianism - Atleast Libertarians have the right idea about opposing NATO, this is just oxymoronic.


 * [[File:4chan.png]] 4-Chan Model - I cannot stand 4chan. More specifically, /pol/.


 * [[File:Darwinist.png]] Social Darwinism - You are evil and fucking insane.


 * [[File:Cfash.png]] Clerical Fascism - God didn't dictate shit, much less dictating you hating jews.


 * [[File:Neoliberal-icon.png]] Neoliberalism - Global poor up my ass. Just fuck you, you've ruined the name of social democracy, globalization has killed social democracy in the west, and their mistake was not killing it but embracing it.


 * [[File:Necon.png]] Neoconservatism - The cause of a lot of suffering in developing countries and home abroad. Eroding civil liberties, pretty much legal terrorism, and much more. Your idea of spreading democracy is overthrowing democratically elected presidents and replacing them with brutal dictators? This is truly a despicable ideology.


 * [[File:SJW.png]] Woketards - Not true progressives, being a progressive should mean being open to new ideas and tolerant based off of rational analysis, not silencing all who disagree with you just because it hurt your feelings and replacing all culture with this inclusive post-modern nonsense.


 * [[File:Dengf.png]] Dengism - "Ackually, these warehouses full of child slaves are the people's warehouses" 🤓🤓🤓


 * [[File:World_Federalism2.png]] World Federalism - Imperialism but its "friendly imperialism", wowie!


 * [[File:Esofash.png]] Esoteric Fascism - Larp. based gaming


 * [[File:Nazi.png]] National Socialism - kys.


 * [[File:Corp.png]] Corporatocracy - Literally the status quo.


 * [[File:Marxlen.png]] Marxist Leninism - Totalitarian communism and its consequences have been a mistake for humanity.


 * [[File:Austrobert.png]] Austrolibertarianism - A society without any taxation or regulations at all is one that wouldn't objectively work.


 * [[File:Altr.png]] Alt-Right - Reactionary degenerate with a trap fetish addiction.


 * [[File:Plcn2.png]] Paleoconservatism - Take your "traditional family values" and shove them.


 * [[File:Revcon.png]] Revolutionary Conservatism & [[File:Ultraprogressivism.png]] Revolutionary Progressivism - Bruh.


 * [[File:ReactPix.png]] Reactionary Modernism - You are a walking contradiction, and do not exist.


 * [[File:World.png]] Globalism - Imperialism with a human face. Stop killing national sovereignties of countries and outsourcing everyone's jobs!


 * [[File:Christy.png]] [[File:JewTheo.png]] [[File:Muslim 2.png]] [[File:Hind.png]] [[File:Bud.png]] Theocracies - Why should I live for some "God" or "spirits" that do not exist?.
 * [[File:Muslim 2.png]] Islamic Theocracy - Islam is a religion of violence, backwardsness, and primitiveness, not peace.
 * [[File:JewTheo.png]] Jewish Theocracy - Fuck Juda, fuck your god, and fuck your religion.
 * [[File:Hind.png]] Hindu Theocracy - I don't really know a whole lot about hinduism, but yeah.
 * [[File:Christy.png]] Catholic Theocracy - This is something I actually have to deal with in my life so yeah, fuck you.
 * [[File:Bud.png]] Buddhist_Theocracy - One of the least offensive one's here.
 * [[File:Stateath.png]] State Atheism - Totalitarian enforcement of ideals by the state is still totalitarian enforcement of ideals by the state, regardless of whose doing it. I would prefer more of the way anarchists dealt with organized religion, not through direct state action, but anti-clericalism enforced by the actual people themselves, which could be seen during the spanish civil war during the red terror, that's my kind of anti-clericalism.


 * [[File:RelNat.png]] Religious Nationalism - you turn any society you're placed in into ruin.


 * [[File:Ethplur.png]] Ethnopluralism - I have never seen any promoters of you that haven't been white nationalists.


 * [[File:Ethnonat.png]] Ethnic Nationalism - Ethnostates are a bad idea.


 * [[File:AnEn.png]] Anti-Environmentalism - You have caused millions of deaths, and many more to come. You are the biggest threat in the West, and your influence needs to be actively countered.


 * [[File:Neolud.png]] Neoluddism - I care for the environment, which is why I oppose you. At least you don't deny basic science, but still, really horrible.


 * [[File:Imp.png]] Imperialism - Not even remotely acceptable in the modern day, disgusting ideology. Denying the rights of native populations just to subjugate them into your Empire is deplorable.


 * [[File:Racenat.png]] Racial Nationalism - Racism is gay and cringe.


 * [[File:Ancapf.png]] Anarcho-Capitalism - Fake anarchist.


 * [[File:Authoritarian_Conservatism.png]] Authoritarian Conservatism - Cringe on top of cringe.


 * [[File:Totalitarian.png]] Totalitarianism - D I E.

Philosophical Relations=
 * [[File:Ingsocf.png]] Ingsoc - no.

Positive

 * [[File:Materialism.png]] Materialism No gods.


 * [[File:Indiv.png]] Individualism - No masters.


 * [[File:Hedonism-cloud.png]] Mh:polcompballanarchy:Hedonism - Only material desires.


 * [[File:Antinil.png]] - The meaning of life is what you create in it.


 * [[File:Mach.png]] Machiavellianism - The ends justify the means.

Neutral

 * [[File:Cosmo.png]] Cosmopolitanism - You're right about having dual citizenship about our nation and the world, but I'm a bit skeptical of you because of your toleration of cultures that go against cosmopolitan values. Still an ok philosophy, but flawed.


 * [[File:Fishe.png]] - I agree with the stances on authority, but authoritarianism is excessive.


 * [[File:CountEn.png]] Counter-Enlightenment - We're both critical of enlightenment rationality and progressivism, as I don't really feel as if we've progressed anywhere as a society. However, our reasonings are different from that point forwards, as I'm not concerned with "divine" or whatever, which a lot of your philosophers are concerned with obviously. My opposition towards the enlightenment is more towards its metanarratives, and not about conservatism.


 * [[File:Enlightnenment.png]] Enlightenment - My philosophy is technologically this because of my political liberalism, but I do seriously doubt you at times. I just think this philosophy suits my own political ideology, but I'm willing to change in the future.

Negative

 * [[File:Col.png]] Collectivism - Collect these nuts.

Anti-Ideology Relations =
 * [[File:Postmodernicon.png]] - Bruh this is so fucking retarded, this is just philosophical "fuck everything because I feel like it", it doesn't make any sense.

Positive
Anti-Authoritarianism - Reject totalitarian dictatorships, embrace freedom and democracy.

Anti-Imperialism - Empires are evil, and shouldn't exist.

Anti-Collectivism - While opposing mass individualism, I don't believe in this "be altruistic and community serving" nonsense, and largely value my own individual autonomy as a person. Why should I bend to the will of others? Society is driven by individual interests, and the collective is nothing without the individual, so I'm naturally going to pursue my own interests and hobbies free from authority.

Anti-Racism - Racism is a modern day evil that has no place in society.

Anti-Nihilism - Nihilism is dumb and pointless.

Anti-Sexism - Hating someone for the gender they were born as is the lowest form of tribalism.

Anti-Easternism - Eastern states are oppressive shitty authoritarian dictatorships. However, how many of you guys tend to be atlanticists is quite frankly concerning.

Anti-Reactionarism - All reactionaries are closeted fags.

Anti-Idpol - Identity politics in general are preachy, tribalistic, and only further submit our differences instead of uniting us. Which, is determinantal to US politics as a whole. And yes, BOTH sides are guilty as charged, whether it be someone who is celebrating the fact that they are gay and black or someone celebrating the fact they are straight and white, it ultimately doesn't matter. Both sides are cringe regardless and do nothing for societal equality.

Anti-Clericalism - Pretty based, religious authority suppresses individuality and assaults our civil liberties. Just don't hate religious people or their beliefs.

Anti-Religion - Not against religious people or their beliefs, just a personal stance on religion, as I believe its cultural influences do more harm than good for society.

Anti-Communism - Communism is the definition of failure.

Left Anti-Communism - Leftists can be anti-communist too! However, I'm not a leftist in a traditional sense obviously, as liberalism and leftism are often confused for each other when they mean different things, but I am somewhat leaning left so I can consider myself a left anti-communist.

Anti-Fascism - Modern day antifascist adherents are cringe, my anti-fascism is more derived from WW2 era social democratic anti-fascism, which were the true anti-fascists.

Anti-Consumerism - The worship of capitol and its consequences have been a disaster for society.

Anti-Nazism - Basically the same thing I said for anti-fascism.

Anti-Austerity - Austerity measures has been a disaster for the public as a whole.

Anti-Colonialism - Colonialism is an evil that must be fought against.

Anti-Zionism - Anti-Zionism doesn't equal anti-semitism. I'm not fundamentally opposed to a Jewish state existing, and I congratulate Israel on having one of the highest performing economies, which has been a result of the western values the country has adopted compared to its middle eastern counter-parts, but Israel perpetuates the military industrial complex that I'm opposed to. And ethnostates are cringe regardless.

Anti-Xenophobia - Ethnic nationalism is cancerous, less cancerous than racial nationalism, but still a cancerous influence on society.

Anti-Putinism - Putin is a kleptocratic authoritarian conservative dictator, I shouldn't have to explain why I dislike him.

Anti-Dengism - China is a totalitarian pseudo-fascist dictatorship, screw anyone who apologies for the CCP and its government.

Anti-EU- The EU in its current state is an neoliberal empire that pushes austerity onto its member states, it desperately needs to reform and its governing bodies if it wishes to survive the modern day.

Anti-Globalism - Evil, vile, disgusting, how much more words can I use to describe this?

Anti-Neoliberalism - Neoliberalism is a exploitive system that enslaves the global poor.

Anti-Atlanticism - Why so much social democrats defend the West when its literally overthrown democratically elected social democratic leaders is beyond me to be honest. Although, please do not side with Eurasianists, and oppose both empires!

Anti-Cultural Extremism - Cultural extremes, whether its woke baizuo postmodern intersectional idpol, or white nationalist reactionary supremacy idpol, are cringe.

Anti-Wokeism - Wokes are racists in-denial. Identity should never matter, and silences those who disagree with you for the sake of political correctness assaults our free speech. However, don't confuse with the anti-sjw movement which often uses the same tactics as the SJW's they are actually fighting against. I oppose woke ideology itself, and identity politics from the left and the right.

Anti-Multiculturalism - Based, multiculturalism just destroys national identities and tolerates backwards cultures.

Anti-Anti-Liberalism - Liberalism is the least worst political ideology to have existed, and the most successful to have existed. Anyone who takes this for granted is foolish.

Anti-Tanke - Tankies are state-capitalists in denial.

Anti-Islam - I'm specifically against Islamic culture because it is incompatible with western values and its backwardness, not against Arabs themselves. As islamophobia is still racism which is something I do genuinely opposed if it wasn't obvious.

Mixed
Anti-Capitalism - While free market capitalism is bad, endorsing anti-capitalism is too far for me. When has socialism shown to ever outbeat capitalism in the modern day?

Anti-Westernism/NATO - Western imperialism sucks, but western values have shown to work compared to the values of any other country. Also, I'm very conflicted on NATO myself. Abolishing the north atlantic treaty organization now would be idiotic beyond any doubt, but to support such an organization that has overthrown my own democratically elected leaders is foolish, the eventual endgoal of NATO should be to dissolve into a collective security council, as it has shown to put profit over human rights.

Anti-Old Leftism - The old left has good criticism of the modern day left and postmodernism, but some of them are also socially conservative for the same reasons as well, which is cringe for me. Anti-IDPOL leftism is based, but please don't oppose wokeness because it threatens your traditional values.

Anti-Anarchism - Authority sucks, but there still needs to be a state. But, many people who claim to be "anti-anarchy" also endorse totalitarianism as well.

Anti-Theism - I'm not opposed to working with religious people who respect secularism though.

Anti-Conservatism - Well it is accepted that traditions themselves stem from the past, some traditions are good for society and should be kept.

Anti-Socialism - I don't think socialism is feasible to fully implement either, but you need to chill out with being against any form of welfare or government intervention in the economy.

Anti-Monarchism - I'm quite indifferent towards you. Do I really give a shit about some monarchs? No, I could care less if they were abolished. In the same way I don't care about abolishing them, I just don't care about them in-general.

Negative
Anti-Feminism - Feminism is still needed in society. And besides, many of you guys just are just blatant misogynists who hate women.

Anti-Pornism - Imagine being such an uptight person where you feel the need to enforce your will onto others, if it makes me happy, then i'm going to do it, and I could care less.

Anti-Sexualism - An even cringier version of the above.

Anti-Semitism - I've been called anti-semitic so much times for even the slightest criticisms of Israel, it's so fucking dumb, I NEVER MENTIONED ONCE THAT I HATED JEWS AS AN ETHNIC GROUP. Implying I'm anti-semitic would mean I'm against secular judaism and ethnic jews as people, which is a completely retarded and unfounded claim.

Anti-Hispanism - Skill issue and ratio.

Anti-Abortionism - Why would anyone to unironically label them self as this?

Anti-Progressivism -

Anti-Liberalism - I want my individual rights respected.

Anti-Reformism - Revolution in democracies is pointless.

Anti-Enviromentalism - There's basically no difference between this and conservatism lmao.

Anti-Nationalism - One's own love for their culture and nation are entirely natural.

Anti-Patriotism - Lol.

Anti-Americanism - I understand why people resent us abroad, but ethnic self-hated is dumb.

Anti-Egalitarianism - Everyone in society is created equally.

Anti-LGBT - I disagree with the LGBT pride movement, but this is just childish and stupid.

Anti-Individualism - Fuck your collectivism, I do as I want.

Sinophobia - I dislike China and its government, not its people like some morons here have claimed.

Russophobia - Once again, I also do not hate ethnic Russians if that wasn't obvious. Self-Insert Relations= (Note: This is purely ideological, unless you're a massive dick/larper)

Good

 * [[File:Kirblyism-Icon.png]] Kirbly ([[File:Socgeo.png]]/[[File:Transh.png]])- Very based progressivism. Not sure about this whole world federalism and transhumanism thing though. But I can admire your futuristic world-view, even if it is far-fetched. You're pretty based.


 * [[File:Ninjack.png]] Ninjack-Aus ([[File:Libms.png]]/[[File:World_Federalism2.png]]) - You have pretty good cultural views, and good economics. although military intervention is cringe. You seem like a good person


 * [[File:Mebrouk.png]] Mebrouk ([[File:Socdem.png]]/[[File:Islamic_Liberalism.png]]) - We're basically the same, very based ideologically wise. Although, a religious democracy for me is really eh considering everything I've said about it, but in your case it would be the most practical.


 * [[File:BeryAbLib.png]] BeryAb ([[File:NeoClib.png]]/[[File:Nalib.png]]) - For someone whose right-libertarian leaning, you're pretty based. Our principles our the same but our end goals are different. Overall, good. (Also massive shame your reddit account got terminated out of no where, rip)


 * [[File:YellingLiber.png]] YellingYowie ([[File:Socliber.png]]/[[File:Neobert.png]]) - While your economics and cultural stances are acceptable, your foreign policy is severely misguided. Like, how do you plan on waging war in countries while also having a small government?


 * [[File:Liberal-icon.png]] Liberal ([[File:Scientocracy_Small.png]]/[[File:Socdem.png]]) - I like what I see here, based!


 * [[File:Enaysikey.png]] Enaysikey ([[File:Socliber.png]]/[[File:Neotech.png]]) - Welfare libertarian, nice. Although being into eugenics is weird.


 * [[File:Avelicius.png]] Joogotakensaad ([[File:Soccap.png]]/[[File:Progconf.png]]) - Welfare capitalist, based.


 * [[File:Cflski.png]] Sykar Socialist ([[File:3princ.png]]/[[File:Socdem.png]]) - Your economics don't sound bad and you also hate the PRC as well, so you're pretty well off in my book.


 * [[File:JudePortrait.png]] High Priest Jude ([[File:Dsa.png]]/[[File:Leftpop-0.png]]) - DemSoc, tolerable. Based cultural views too.


 * [[File:TonyNew.png]] Tony567 ([[File:Marketsoc.png]]/[[File:Sep.png]]) - Really weird set of beliefs. Market socialism is pretty eh, as an economy centered around workers co-ops has shown to be the most successful form of socialism, but still not desirable. Along with this separatism stuff.


 * [[File:Vonali.png]] Vonali ([[File:Socliber.png]]/[[File:Civlibert.png]]) - Progressive Social Libertarianism, not bad.


 * [[File:Skyrum536.png]] Skyrum536 ([[File:Demsocstar.png]]/[[File:Prog.png]]) - DemSoc, against authoritarianism and is a democratic federalist. Nice.


 * [[File:EvolvingSoc.png]] DuyQuangNguyenPham ([[File:Marketsoc.png]]/[[File:Civnat.png]]) - A more leftist version of me, I agree with him on a lot of stuff.


 * [[File:TheIced.png]] The Iced ([[File:Georgist.png]]/[[File:Transh.png]]) - Too reliant on free markets but LVT is based, and so is cultural progressivism.


 * [[File:SamKibGuy_icon_.png]] SamkibGuy ([[File:Republicanismpix.png]]/[[File:Thar.png]]) - Your ideology is good, but I don't understand how you can like authoritarian communists while fighting for democracy at the same time. Atleast we agree on Social democracy which is based.


 * [[File:Yoda8soup.png]] Yoda8soup ([[File:Socgeo.png]]/[[File:Ecosoc.png]]) - Your economics for me personally are too left-wing, but your progressivism, and environmentalism are both very based.


 * [[File:RabbitIcon.png]] ComradeRabit95 ([[File:Demsocstar.png]]/[[File:Leftnat.png]]) - Too lefty, but not bad. Don't know a whole lot about your ideology since you don't have anything on your page, just going off your ideologies alone.


 * [[File:Silasf.png]] Sorcersilas is here ([[File:Distributist.png]]/[[File:Libms.png]]) - I prefer unions, but still, a decently good ideology.


 * [[file:Syntridem2.png]] Applethesky2021 ([[File:Cdem.png]]/[[File:Georgist.png]]) - I'd like to think you're just a more socially conservative and nationalistic version of me, which you are. Not the worst, at least we both oppose totalitarian evils and have a mutual disliking of globalism. Although being against populism is cringe,.


 * [[File:Liberalsoc.png]] TheJester ([[File:Liberalsoc.png]]/[[File:Marketsoc.png]]) - Too left-wing for me personally, but still a decently based ideology. Love your cultural takes.


 * [[File:Vamp.png]] DerVampir666 ([[File:Distlib.png]]/[[File:Farm.png]]/[[File:Geolib.png]]) - Your ideas are pretty interesting. Not a fan of this whole cultural protectionism crap, free-trade, or agrarianism, though. But, your social values are good I suppose. Interesting for a libertarian market socialist.


 * [[File:Uzarashvilism.png]] Uzarash ([[File:Progconf.png]]/[[File:Demsocstar.png]]) - We have a lot of common enemies on foreign policy, but your more traditional views are cringe. At least we both hate China and Russia.


 * [[File:Glencoe.png]] Glencoe13 ([[File:Liberalsoc.png]]/[[File:Steinval.png]]/[[File:Minmut.png]]) - Libertarian socialism to me is a big meh. Tolerable compared to the status quo, but still not diserable for me personally, not the worst though.

Meh

 * [[File:NSL.png]] Pirate Tails ([[File:Natprog.png]]/[[File:Liberaltarianism.png]])- If you were less nationalist then you'd be fine.


 * [[File:Sweatingcup.png]] SweatingCup2632 ([[File:Sec.png]]/[[File:Newkeynes.png]]) - Bootlicker, but not the worst.


 * [[File:Neoairisu.png]] SumisuAirisu ([[File:Demcon.png]]/[[File:Anqueer.png]]) - Meh honestly, not a fan of anarchism but could be worse.


 * [[File:Councilguy2.png]] Councilguy ([[File:Anpostleft.png]]/[[File:Ego.png]])- Not fond of egoism, but you're a nice user.


 * [[File:Ultroneism.png]] LordCompost86 ([[File:Ego.png]]/[[File:Skepticism.png]]) - Obviously not a fan of this ideology or egoism, but you seem like a nice person.


 * [[File:PostChronic.png]] ChronicFemcel ([[File:Anpostleft.png]]/[[File:Post-an.png]]) - Cringe egoist but nice person.


 * [[File:Neotechnocracy.png]] BasedCringeOrMeh ([[File:Neotechnocracy.png]]/[[File:Transh.png]])- Pretty based economically and culturally, but authoritarianism isn't based and democracy is cool.


 * [[File:Nivballf.png]] Niveous Laccolith ([[File:Ego.png]]/[[File:Anpostleft.png]]) - Anarchism is cringe. But is socially progressive.


 * [[File:Ancom_Furry.png]] ThisIsMyUsernameAAAA ([[File:Ancom.png]]/[[File:Antifa.png]]) - Based cultural values, but being an ancom isn't helping.


 * [[File:Affiliated-grump.png]] Affiliated ([[File:Postciv.png]]/[[File:Econil.png]]) - Some post civilization leftist, wonky and funny tbh.


 * [[File:TDRH.png]] ThatDudeRightHere ([[File:Liberalconservative.png]]/[[File:Cdem.png]]) - Not a whole lot to say about this, moderate conservativism is whatever to be honest. We do have a lot in common in interests through so that's cool.


 * [[File:Bsaheedism-icon.png]] Bsaheed527 ([[File:Post-an.png]]/[[File:Anpostleft.png]]) - Yeah, I'm really unsure what to say about this ideology. You as a person though, are chill.


 * [[File:Ashley.png]] AshleyHere ([[File:Libsoc.png]]/[[File:Indiv.png]]) - I honestly like your new ideological development. Still not great, but better than what it was before. Libertarian socialism atleast is a step up.


 * [[File:TipuiSmall.png]] Tipui ([[File:Ego.png]]/[[File:Anpostleft.png]]) - Another egoist, okay this is getting out of hand. I will say your earlier years were quite based, if that means anything.


 * [[File:M99.png]] M99.exe ([[File:Synd.png]]/[[File:Ormarxf.png]]) - A communist, albeit not the worst one I've seen and seems to be friendly towards socdems, atleast you're pragmatic.


 * [[File:DragonRed.png]] DragonRed ([[File:Dsa.png]]/[[File:Leftnat.png]]) - While promoting scientific advancement is definitely based, your authoritarianism is definitely not.


 * [[File:AbEntball.png]] The Grand Anarch ([[File:Post-an.png]]/[[File:Hedonism-cloud.png]]) - So you managed to make your ideology even more crazy, but honestly a step up from your last.


 * [[File:Drunkardsdjxfh.png]] Stk ([[File:Neoliberal-icon.png]]/[[File:Libhawk.png]]) - Doesn't fail in every regard, so gets refrained from putting in cringe. But still, neoliberal economics is cringe, and being a liberal hawk is no better than a Neoconservative.


 * [[File:And3 .png]] And3 ([[File:Commie.png]]/[[File:Globnat.png]]/[[File:Radenv.png]]) - Communism and anarchism are cringe for me, sorry. Progressivism and international co-operation are net positives.


 * [[File:S1984.png]] Savvas1984 ([[File:Statlib.png]]/[[File:Transh.png]]) - You're an unironic state liberal? Only good thing is your technological take.


 * [[File:PagTheo.png]] Pantheon ([[File:Unimon.png]]/[[File:SocDist.png]]) - Surprisingly based economics, and I like civil libertarianism. But man, that monarchism stuff has to go. Also, is a vaushite as well.


 * [[File:Ioist.png]] Iooootheanarchist ([[File:Anqueer.png]]/[[File:Antifa.png]]) - Just your typical anarshit. Also, is weirdly an interventionist as well? Makes sense considering they are a vaushite. Atleast you have seemingly tolerable cultural takes.


 * [[File:InexUser.png.png]] Inexistent-User ([[File:Soctrans.png]]/[[File:Technocracy.png]]) - The only bit I really like about this is your endorsement of technological development, everything else is pretty cringe though.


 * [[File:TheElectricBomb.png]] TheElectricBomb ([[File:Lpop.png]]/[[File:Dsa.png]]) - Hating NATO and socialism is kinda cringe. But, I did indeed epically troll you.


 * [[File:Novochirotesla.png]] Chirotesla ([[File:Marketsoc.png]]/[[File:Consocf.png]]) - Your ideology may be one of the least bad out of the old leftists, but it has seriously gotten worse over time. Too left-wing on economics. Being anti-imperialist, environmentalist, a fair-trade protectionist, pro-choice, cultural integration that focuses more on culture tolerance, and more tolerant on LGBT issues than your other friends, which are all welcome. But, overall, too conservative for my liking.


 * [[File:Quark.png]] Quark ([[File:StateathFedora.png]]/[[File:Socgeo.png]]) - Cool dude, and has pretty decent economics. But, authoritarianism is something I cannot get behind under most circumstances.


 * [[File:Anglo-Germanic_Socialist.png]] Anglo-germanic socialist ([[File:Ormarxf.png]]/[[File:Progress.png]]) - Progressivism is hella based, but Marxism isn't.


 * [[File:TheFed.png]] TheFedGuy101 ([[File:CathDem.png]]/[[File:ClassDistr.png]]) - Economically wise, we somewhat match each other. But, everything else I see here is cringe, as I value my own individual worth over pointless things like organized religion or conservatism.


 * [[File:MrsVzrFlag.png]] MarsVizir [[File:MrsVzr2.png]] ([[File:Prog.png]]/[[File:Demsocstar.png]]/[[File:World Federalism2.png]]) - I don't hate or love any of your ideas, I dislike how you idolize utopian economics though. And, while alter-globalism is good, world federalism is unnecessary. But, progressivism is something I can get behind.


 * [[File:Amm1.png]] Am_m ([[File:Anarcho-Frontierism.png]]/[[File:Anin.png]]/[[File:Antr.png]]) - Your individualism goes too far, even for me. And, anarchism is really cringe, as you're just letting yourself be ruled by a mob instead of a governmental authority, meaning there is no fundamental difference between the two.


 * [[File:Rebel Alliance.png]] CarbynSobek ([[File:Leftnat.png]]/[[File:Statesoc.png]]/[[File:Lpop.png]]) - Based left-wing nationalism and populism, but I'm not in fan of a state-guided economy under socialism, that has always lead to economic stagnation and it just being a glorified version of state capitalism. Supporting progressive policies like abortion rights and feminism is based though.

Not Good

 * [[File:Typicalfan2.png]] Typicalfan4 ([[File:Altl.png]]/[[File:Natcon.png]]) - Typical alt-lite, but still is a moderate.


 * [[File:USLibertarians.png]] NotADopeMan ([[File:Chilib.png]]/[[File:Obj.png]]) - A libertarian whose completely opposed to state intervention? Cringe, albeit not the worst thing I've seen. It's still pretty bad.


 * [[File:Libcon.png]] ResponsibleCitizen ([[File:Libcon.png]]/[[File:Conlib.png]]) - Conservativism and Libertarianism are gigasoy, along with isolationism. You seriously want the US to give up its influence in the world as a hyperpower? What is wrong with you?


 * [[File:SomeCrusade.png]] SomeCrusader1224 ([[File:Trad.png]]/[[File:Conlib.png]]) - This dude is my opposite in almost every way other than government, not a bad person though.


 * [[File:Smelegem.png]] Smelegem ([[File:MLM.png]]/[[File:Islamic_Democracy.png]]) - Unironic maoist. Literally one of the worst communists to ever exist in the history of ever with the worst economics that I've ever heard. Cool person though ig.


 * [[File:RojanALT.PNG]] Rojo346 ([[File:Conlib.png]]/[[File:Socliber.png]]) - Typical conservative, nahhhh... You as a person are fine though.


 * [[File:NeoLibtard.png]] ANewDude ([[File:Neoliberal-icon.png]]/[[File:Progressive_Imperialism.png]]) - Illiterate neoliberal retard who thinks hating neoliberalism means hating the global poor.


 * [[File:Distributist.png]] Dumnorix ([[File:Distributist.png]]/[[File:Trad.png]]) - Cringe conservative, but it's not everyday you see a traditionalist libleft.


 * [[File:JoeyFloppa_boo.png]] JoeyFloppa ([[File:Libcon.png]]/[[File:Austrobert.png]]) - I hardly see how you're an Individualist.


 * [[File:Danielspaniel-Icon.png]] Danieltenspaniel ([[File:ML.png]]/[[File:StateathFedora.png]]) - A tankie who is atleast socially progressive.


 * [[File:MossadTest.png]] Mossad ([[File:Relzion.png]]/[[File:Conlib.png]]) - A religious conservative who stands for Israel. Basically PragerUism.


 * [[File:Azathoth.png]] Azathoth ([[File:Post-an.png]]/[[File:CountEn.png]]) - Nothing against you but you reject enlightenment thinking and are a reactionary anarchist, but you're not even socially conservative so you don't get put in the lowest tier.


 * [[File:Statlibertarian.png]] SuddenWriter - ([[File:Libertarian.png]]/[[File:Anticommunism.png]]) - I refuse to believe this is anything other than a meme lmao.


 * [[File:Cball-France-Beret.png]] Cheebow8 ([[File:Conservative.png]]/[[File:Trumpism.png]]) - Yeah, I'm basically not convinced by anything I read on this page. Conservatism is cringe and soy. Although, you are very friendly from what I've observed, I will give you that.


 * [[File:MLM.png]] Marsvner ([[File:MLM.png]]/[[File:Ultraprogressivism.png]]/[[File:WokeCommiesucc.png]]) - Bruh Maoism is actual ass, atleast you don't seem authoritarian but come on now, even the Chinese abandoned it for a reason.


 * [[File:SST-icon.png]] ShadowRaiden ([[File:Progconsoc.png]]/[[File:Distributist.png]]) - So, you're not as conservative. But your anti-individualist stances are garbage. There's a reason why people protest over the govenment on things that are needed for societal improvement like vaccines, it's because people do not trust the government, and neither do I. Nor, will I buy into this collectivist mindset you have. Overall, some good, mostly bad.
 * [[File:DN_Adm.png]] DarknightYuusha-11 ([[File:Consocf.png]]/[[File:Marketsoc.png]]) - Basically, everything I said about Shadow could be applied to you, with there being not a whole of differences. Too left-wing on economics, first world cultural conservatism, and being really lenient on authoritarianism are really cringe for me.
 * [[File:Balodismconsmall.png]] IvarBalodis ([[File:Guildsoc.png]]/[[File:Progconsoc.png]]) - Corporatism is good, even if too left-wing. But, still too socially conservative for my taste. And, once again, anti-individualism is garbage.
 * [[File:Xenoassemblage.png]] Xenosystems - ([[File:ColdGod.png]]/[[File:CybNil.png]]/[[File:POSTHUMANISMICON.png]]/[[File:Fut2.png]]) - You have interesting beliefs to say the least. The only thing I can really say that is tolerable about this ideology is its seemingly being progressive. Outside of that, I agree with next to nothing with this fever dream you call an ideology.

Objectively Cringe Garbage

 * [[File:KaiserKlaus.png]] KaiserKlausMouse ([[File:PanGerman.png]]/[[File:Cball-CSA.png]]/[[File:NeoFash.png]]) - Cringy larping fed.


 * [[File:Ukraiana.png]] Ukraiana ([[File:Nazi.png]]/[[File:Whitesup.png]]/[[File:Altr.png]]) - 💀


 * [[File:MedDavilanda.png]] Davilanda13 ([[File:Ancapf.png]]/[[File:Reactcross.png]]) - What a steaming pile of horseshit of an ideology. Ancaps are super edgy.


 * [[File:ReactionaryCentrism6.png]] Bannned ([[File:Cfash.png]]/[[File:Christy.png]]) - Firstly, this "centrist" was hardly a centrist. Secondly, Cringe edgelord larper. Glad SumisuAirisu made you live up to your username. Good riddance lol.


 * [[File:Coindorni-icon-new.png]] Coindorni ([[File:Ancapf.png]]/[[File:Reactcross.png]]) - Another reactionary ancap, how much of you guys just are secretly fascists in denial?


 * [[File:Vizantion-Storm.png]] TheHellenicStorm ([[File:Strasser.png]]/[[File:Neonazi_ball.png]]/[[File:Flang.png]]) - Nazi, credit where credit is due though you're an actual national socialist. Still a Nazi, which is fucking cringe, retarded, and most definitely a larp.


 * [[File:OrthReactPaleominarchist.png]] BasedRussianMikuru ([[File:Feud.png]]/[[File:Orth.png]]) - A reactionary theocratic larper who has defended feudalism. Overall very cringe and weird.


 * [[File:Heinrich_Cheung.png]] Heinrich Cheung ([[File:Neonazi_ball.png]]/[[File:Nazcap-Hat.png]]) - So this is the "superior aryan master race" I've heard so highly about, huh? Totally not a larp.


 * [[File:Classfash.png]] LKR15tye ([[File:Euras.png]]//[[File:Fash.png]]) - Fashoid. "He hates me as much as he hates the nazis according to his page". Your ideology has lead to nothing but death, destruction, and misery for all that had to suffer under it.


 * [[File:Duckf.png]] Duck-Citizen ([[File:Ancapf.png]]/[[File:Reactcross.png]]) - ancap? check. reactionary? check. vomit worthy ideology? check.


 * [[File:TolkienIRLicon.png]] Tolkien_IRL ([[File:Abmon.png]]/[[File:Nazcap-Hat.png]]) - If this serious, I have actually zero words.


 * [[File:Palostius.png]] Palostius ([[File:Ingsocf.png]]/[[File:Reactcross.png]]/[[File:Darwinist.png]]/[[File:Mansphere.png]]) - Sexist incel larper. How long as your ass been without a shower, holy shit. This entire dude's personality is gloating his shit takes.


 * [[File:Dualusf.png]] DualPlay1 ([[File:Statesoc.png]]/[[File:StateathFedora.png]]) - A conservative authoritarian communist. Basically just a cringier version of quark.


 * [[File:Noel21231-icon.png]] Noel21231 ([[File:Altl.png]]/[[File:Wumao.png]]/[[File:Reactlib.png]]) - Typical Malaysian Wumao retard who simps neo-nazis and thinks being "anti-woke" makes him cool.


 * [[File:EpicConIcon.png]] NazBolGANG12 ([[File:Tradcon.png]]/[[File:Distributist.png]]) - Ok, on a serious note, you're not getting put here because of your personality but because of your ideology. Your personality is fine, your ideology on the other hand is very cringe.


 * [[File:Socnat.png]] AmericanFuturist ([[File:Socnat.png]]/[[File:Fash.png]]) - Was cringe the first time, is still cringe the second time.


 * [[File:Baconsalad123_Icon.png]] Baconsalad123 ([[File:Sorelia.png]]/[[File:Nazi.png]]) - Racial nationalism, totalitarianism, fascism. Easily one of the most dystopian self-inserts on this site.


 * [[File:Svs.png]] SNEEDIVS ([[File:Catheo.png]]/[[File:Monarch.png]]) - Bruh why are there so many reactards on this site. I think this dude actually thinks it's the 10th century or something.


 * [[File:NatDem.png]] Black drone ([[File:Authcap.png]]/[[File:Mansphere.png]]/[[File:Rpop-tinfoilhat.png]]/[[File:Plcn2.png]]) - Now, this is a prime example as to why I will never get my morality from religion (as if every single reacttard on this site wasn't example enough). Where do I start? Authoritarian religious conservatism and manosphere? Yeah, along with you supporting corrupt politicians while being supposedly "anti-corruption". Pretty bad.


 * [[File:Firebender12345ism.png]] Firebender12345 ([[File:Monarch.png]]/[[File:3P.png]]) - Lol, Monarcho-fascist who wants to restore a failed political systems back in Ireland. Monarchy and fascism is dead for a reason, good luck with that.


 * [[File:ImmorThought.png]] TheImmorxy ([[File:Statesoc.png]]/[[File:Hoxha.png]]) - Just your averagely unremarkable Totalitarian Marxist-Leninist. Basically, nothing good.


 * [[File:Mikolayism_Pixel2.png]] MedicsChaotics ([[File:ModStrasser.png]]/[[File:Consocf.png]]) - Claims not to be anti-semitic, yet uses anti-semitic dogwhistles? Also, what is the hell is "moderate strasserism"? Any way, your authoritarianism and unironic liking of otto strasser are just massive nopes.


 * [[File:PATS.png]] ChineseSocialist ([[File:ML.png]]/[[File:Natcom.png]]/[[File:Consocf.png]]) - Sorry but, there's no nice way to say this, your ideology is retarded and filled with Ideological contradict after ideological contradiction, even after ignoring such ideological contradictions present within your ideology (Ex: Glorifying the CCP as a "leftist", so much for being an "anti-revisionist" "Marxist-Leninist"), your baseline ideology is just horrible and closer to third positionism than it is to actual socialism. You might as well just call yourself ChineseStateCapitalist, because even without the Chinese and Belarusian government bootlicking, which everyone knows is contradictory (Because if you were a true ML whose anti-revisionary you would oppose both the West and the Belarusian government), ML's are state capitalists in denial even if they don't suck off the cock of the Chinese government.


 * [[File:LeninisBasedsmall.png]] Leninisbased556 ([[File:ML.png]]/[[File:Authprog.png]]) - Ah yes, an ML that apologies for China, why am I not surprised. Typical online neo marxist-leninist.


 * [[File:Dengf.png]] 国际联盟球 ([[File:CronCapMask.png]]/[[File:Wumao.png]]/[[File:XiJinpingThoughtf.png]]) - Bruh, China is a totalitarian one party dictatorship with no respect for human rights. To side with all countries in the world, you choose the Chinese government?
 * [[File:RonziCom.png]] Ronzipot ([[File:Statesoc.png]]/[[File:Christcom.png]]) - Bruh this dude literally went from a classical liberal to an Marxist-Leninist in like a month, and he calls us larpers. Lol.
 * [[File:Technototball.png]] BERNHE0504 ([[File:NeoFash.png]]/[[File:Ultranat.png]]) - Now, you are, in every way, my political opposite. Not too different from all the fascist bs stuff I've seen.
 * [[File:ComradeKretk.png]] ComradeKretk ([[File:Ultraprogressivism.png]]/[[File:Stalin.png]]) - The irony of supporting dictators that go against everything you stand for and would've killed you for existing is hilarious, like with most modern tankies in the West. Not even the progressivism makes up for the unironic totalitarian worshipping and everything I just mentioned.
 * [[File:MLL.png]] NotLibra ([[File:MLM-Alt.png]]/[[File:Native.png]]/[[File:WokeCommiesucc.png]]) - Take your collectivism and shove it up my ass please, you're not a liberator, if millions of people fled authoritarian socialist states.
 * [[File:SmartSimulatorIcon.png]] Smart Simulator ([[File:Authcon.png]]/[[File:Right-AnEn-alt.png]]/[[File:Natcap.png]]) - I'm sorry but, your ideology is retarded and flat out everything I'm opposed too.

*Dies of cringe*

 * [[File:FabiusBigGayHat.png]] PaleoFabius ([[File:Altrightfemboyicon.png]]/[[File:Jnaz.png]]/[[File:Strans.png]]/[[File:Hfash.png]]) - Massive asshole and a larper. Typical wannabe internet fascist who called several people within this community racial inferior. Overall, just your average alt-rightoid retard. Kys, racist asshole. Rip, bozo. And yes, Jews control all of our public institutions and international organizations, is that a problem Gaybius?


 * [[File:Mysticism.png]] Mysticism ([[File:EsoPinkCap.png]]/[[File:Jnaz.png]]/[[File:Strans.png]]/[[File:Hfash.png]]) - Yes, I get my beliefs from paradox strategy games, how could you tell?


 * [[File:Soyjak.png]] AnAnonBoi123 ([[File:Postconan.png]]/[[File:Globnat.png]]/[[File:Kak.png]]) - Ok you really do just fucking suck, jesus christ. You cause so much unnecessary fights for no reason and when you get called out on it you just say it's an "ideological critique". Literally no one likes you, lmao.

Quadrant Relations =
 * [[File:Yugotard.png]] YugoslavPartisan2 ([[File:SJW.png]]/[[File:WokeCommiesucc.png]]/[[File:Altleft.png]]/[[File:Antifa.png]]) - Stalinoid who is the most typical SJW moron on this entire site. I once acted similarly to you, but I've changed my behavior since then because I know it's not worth getting into any worthless online drama, I recommend you do the same.

Based

 * [[File:Centrist-yellow.png]] Centrism - Nice, and moderate, like all should be. Extremism is cringe. And, centrist economics are just in-general pretty based.
 * [[File:Libunity-yellow.png]] Libertarian Unity - You have the entirely right idea when it comes to individual freedom. But, you're too anti-statist. The state is still needed for harm prevention, otherwise, very based.
 * [[File:Libleft.png]] Libertarian Left - This goes so hard, but I seriously hate it when this quadrant is associated with woke baizuos and other people like that. Remove all of those people from this quadrant, and you'd be truly based.

Neutral

 * [[File:Leftunity.png]] Leftist Unity - I don't stand against you in theory, but in actual practice I don't see you as useful for any of my goals unfortunately.
 * [[File:Libright-yellow.png]] Libertarian Right - Right unity, but with some better characteristics. With supporting civil liberties, opposing interventionism, and paternalism, which is nice. But, still suffers from much of the same issues as right unity, with the addition that many adherents to this are socially conservative. But, it's not conservative, then it's remotely tolerable.
 * [[File:Authleft.png]] Authoritarian Left - Some of your leaders have been good forces throughout history, but most of them suck.

Cringe

 * [[File:Authunity.png]] Authoritarian Unity - Some of your leaders have been good, but a lot of unironic neo-nazis and other reactionary thinkers lie within this quadrant as well.
 * [[File:Rightunity-yellow.png]] Rightist Unity - Globalist, free-market capitalism, interventionism. YOU SHOULD KILL YOURSELF, NOW!!!!!!!!!!

Bruh
People's Relations =
 * [[File:Authright.png]] Authoritarian Right - Social collectivism and economic individualism, god, this makes me want to puke... Not even the third-way neoliberals who are socially liberal make this quadrant any better.

Positive

 * [[File:Sanders.png]] Bernie Sanders (95/100) - Bernie Sanders, my beloved Vermont senator <3


 * [[File:SwedenSocDem.png]] Olof Palme (93/100) - What else is there to say about you as a politican other than based and redpilled? You were one of the best presidents Sweden ever had, and calling out American imperialism were it was due was also good as well.


 * [[File:Insarch.png]] Nicholas John Roske - Fuck the Feds for what they did to you. Rest in power, hero. T~T


 * [[File:Shoecialism.png]] Shoe0nHead (90/100) - You were one of my first inspirations and introductions to politics. Although your earlier days were quite cringe. You've earned a special spot for one of the first political commentators I watched.


 * [[File:Mill.png]] John Stuart Mill (91/100) - The harm principle is based. Do what you want to do as long as you're not harming others is how society should be run.


 * [[File:Socdem.png]] Roman Albertovich Abalin (95/100) - Based and redpilled socdem from Russia, we agree on basically everything politically. Shame you had to leave your country due to the borderline fascist dictatorship that is the Putin regime. You've had such an influence on me as well about how I view authoritarian regimes as well, and how shitty and oppressive they are to live in. Russia would be a better place with more people like you living there.


 * [[File:JoshuaWong.png]] Joshua Wong (83/100) - Ehh,,, Don't get me wrong, I am 100% against the CCP and them destroying Hong Kong democracy, but you have said some really stupid stuff, like glorifying British imperialism just because "Chinese Imperialism is worse!". Like, cmon now, tjhat's an embarassing take.


 * [[File:RussiaOfTheFuture.png]] Alexei Navalny (82/100) - You expose the corruption of the United Russia Party and are way better alternative to the current Russian government. But, your borderline ethnic nationalism when it comes to Ukraine and other matters are cringe, you're nearly a perfect replacement for Putin, just drop all of this other stuff please.


 * [[File:Lincolnism.png]] Abraham Lincoln (83/100) - Ended slavery, shame you got assassinated.


 * [[File:Classlib.png]] John Locke (85/100) - While I am not a big fan of your economic model, you were quite based for your time, and so was the enlightenment. The way you fought against reactionary retards and monarchists was certified based.


 * [[File:Socdem.png]] Leung Kwok-hung (93/100) - One of the founders of the social democratic pro-democracy camp in hong kong. Fuck Chinese authorities for what they've done to you, you're a hero to Hong Kong. Rest in power, hero.


 * [[File:FDRismF.png]] Franklin D. Roosevelt (90/100) - Gigachad in a lot of ways, fought against the Nazis and Japanese Imperalists, shame you had to put the Japanese in internment camps, and while they weren't on the same level as the holocaust, still sucks you had to do that.


 * [[File:Dubcekism.png]] Alexander Dubcek (86/100) - Imagine if your government hadn't be crushed by the Soviets. You were one of the more based people in the soviet bloc, and would've left your country off far better than in the hands of the USSR.


 * [[File:NatProg.png]] Theodore Roosevelt (80/100) - Easily the best president we've ever had, up there with FDR. Although your Imperialism was pretty bad.


 * [[File:Keynes.png]] John Maynard Keynes (95/100) - The man who invented the best economic model, stay mad lolberts.


 * [[File:Gore.png]] Al Gore (88/100) - Based environmentalism, you would've been a lot better in many ways to George Bush.


 * [[File:MLK_Jr.png]] Martin Luther King Jr (94/100) - One of the best civil rights leaders in the 20th century, shame you got assassinated.


 * [[File:Gorb.png]] Mikhail Gorbachev (84/100) - Democratized the USSR, ended censorship, and his other reforms were based. Shame they didn't have the effect you wanted, which caused your country to collapse. You had the right idea, and Russia would be a lot better if you were instated into power and not Putin.


 * [[File:Kemal.png]] Mustafa Kemal Ataturk (88/100) - One of the least bad dictators, getting rid of the theocratic Islamic crap was based. Shame all your work of westernizing your country is being undone.

Neutral/Mixed

 * [[File:Obamium.png]] Barrack Obama (57/100) - You were ultimately unremarkable in your presidency, typical centrist democrat.


 * [[File:Corbynism-ball.png]] Jeremy Corbyn (42/100) - Eh, I used to look up to you somewhat, even if I would've never voted for you if I had lived in the UK. But, looking into you further, you do have some legitimately questionable takes and other things that make me lower my opinion on you greatly that I am not unable to look past, still better than the neolibs in labour party.


 * [[File:Bidenism.png]] Joe Biden (55/100) - Meh, you've done some good. But, still the compromise and not what we need.


 * [[File:Long.png]] Huey Long (42/100) - While you did a lot of good for the state of Louisiana, the way you did it was bad! While you may be one of the only good authoritarians, someone could easily come on in and undue all your work and do worse and there would be nobody to stop them.


 * [[File:Tito.png]] Josip Broz Tito (45/100) - Most practical socialist, although authoritarianism is cringe. Atleast you threw fascists into pits and returned them to where they should go, which is undoubtedly based.


 * [[File:Cball-Ukraine.png]] Volodymyr Zelenskyy (42/100) - Look, while I do support your right to self-determination, you're really no different from any other oligarch in post-soviet states.


 * [[File:Cball-British_India.png]] George Orwell (44/100) - Being against authoritarianism is based, but your homophobia, conservatism, and general prejudice are cringe.

Negative

 * [[File:RepubUS.png]] Mike Parson (15/100) - A complete joke of a state Governor, kleptocratic and incompetent idiot. Very typical, did nothing for covid, heighted tensions between protesting groups, blocking voting reform. God, I hate you so fucking much.


 * [[File:RepubUS.png]] Greg Abott (13/100) - If only the incident that left you paralyzed from the waist down left resulted in death, fuck you.


 * [[File:Merkelism.png]] Angela Merkel (21/100) - Typical neoliberal. I don't really have to explain why I dislike her.


 * [[File:Trumpism.png]] Donald Trump (21/100) - You were one of the worst presidents America had in the 21st century. Your tax cuts did not help anyone but the rich, your attacks on American democracy and your authoritarianism, careless protectionist policies, climate denialism. Realistically, should've been impeached. How you haven't been disowned by the GOP establishment astounds me.


 * [[File:AOC.png]] Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (23/100) - You're basically everything that is wrong with the democratic establishment.


 * [[File:Statlib.png]] Justin Trudeau (23/100) - Neoliberal imperialist and a fake progressive. There is very little good I can actually say about you.


 * [[File:Vaushism.png]] Vaush (21/100) - Annoying debate bro. I looked into the whole "justifying CP" stuff and it seems more far fetched now with more context given, but I'm just unsure about that. With this, you're still an annoying and contrarian youtuber. Atleast you support NATO, out of all things, so called "leftist" lmao.


 * [[File:Chavismo.png]] Hugo Chavez (14/100) - Why does anyone look up to this guy as an "anti-imperialist" baston? He was a horrible leader, the socdems that oppose your government would be better.


 * [[File:Reagan.png]] Ronald Reagan (12/100) - Overall, one of the worst presidents America ever had to endure, tricke-down economics are a scam that only made the rich richer and the poor poorer, funded terrorists, and your presidency still has a profound effect on America today. (you're also in hell waiting for heaven to trickle onto you)


 * [[File:Thatcher.png]] Margaret Thatcher (12/100) - Ding dong, the wicked bitch is dead.


 * [[File:Shapirocube.png]] Ben Shapiro (13/100) - Look up what this dude has said about Hispanic people, and you can probably get a good idea as to why I don't look him, disregarding his politics, which I am also fundamentally in disagreement with.


 * [[File:Christianright.png]] Steven Crowder (13/100) - Overall, a massive pussy.


 * [[File:MagicPT.png]] Henry Kissinger (11/100) - Pretty much a terrorist. I really hope you get what's coming to you one day.


 * [[File:Chilib.png]] Milton Friedman (14/100) - Lolbert. Go learn some basic economics.


 * [[File:RonPaul.png]] Ron Paul (14/100) - Everything I despise neatly rapt up into one little package!


 * [[File:BoJo.png]] Boris Johnson (12/100) - Not only was brexit very cringe, your leadership in general is just terrible.


 * [[File:FIDESZ.png]] Viktor Orbán (11/100) - Very cringe Russian asset who is destroying his own country.
 * [[File:Mesocon.png]] Dennis Prager (12/100) - Founder of PragerU, enough said.


 * [[File:GWB.png]] George W. Bush (11/100) - War mongering imperialist and war criminal.


 * [[File:PiS.png]] Andrzej Duda (14/100) - Your party is a laughing stock. From its corruption, authoritarianism, nothing good I can say about it.


 * [[File:Plutocrat.png]] Elon Musk (11/100) - You should be thrown in jail, and your monopoly broken up.


 * [[File:Plutocrat.png]] Jeff Bezos (11/100) - Amazon should be broken up.


 * [[File:Plutocrat.png]] Mark Zuckerberg (11/100) - We all know you're a lizard. Also fuck facebook and the metaverse.


 * [[File:Hitler.png]] Basically, anything related to the Nazis or other Fascist groups (-infinite/100) - The amount of suffering you've inflicted onto the world will never be forgotten. Never again.


 * [[File:Polpot.png]] Pol Pot (-infinite/100) - You left Cambodia in ruins and were a genocidal maniac.


 * [[File:Baath.png]] Bashar Al Assad (6/100) - Genocidal and incompetent. Although God, Syria, and Bashar is an absolute bop, why do authoritarian regimes always make the best songs?


 * [[File:Putin.png]] Vladimir Putin (6/100) - The day your evil empire gets overthrown is the day that the world can see peace.


 * [[File:Lukash.png]] Alexander Lukashenko (6/100) - Anti-semitic and homophobic kleptocractic despot, I fully back the protests against the Byelorussia government. Hopefully one day your reign comes to an end and the Byelorussian people do not have to live under your tyranny.


 * [[File:Dengf.png]] Deng Xiaoping (8/100) - Your reforms may have helped and were necessary for China, but you still quite evil. Not AS bad as your predecessors, but still awful. Not to mention, what you did to things like welfare programs, the protesters, ect.


 * [[File:XiJinpingThoughtf.png]] Xi Jinping (-100/100) - You've in a lot of ways ruined China and set it on a course for failure undoing Deng's reforms and strengthening the totalitarian state of China. Just to think there was some chance China could see a better future. Fuck you! Anyone who supports or defends you are not leftists.


 * [[File:Mao.png]] Mao Zedong (-infinite/100) - You may have brought china out of the feudal system and gave women rights, but you were a totalitarian genocidal maniac who starved millions upon millions of his own people.


 * [[File:Stalin.png]] Joseph Stalin (-infinite/100) - You killed millions of your own people for quite literally no reason. Like, the worst of the worst.


 * [[File:Pinochet-hat.png]] Augusto Pinochet (0/100) - Many of Chile's modern problems can be attributed to you.


 * [[File:CountEn.png]] Oswald Spengler (0/100) - Your works are retarded, and your modern followers like jerking off to drawn images of children.


 * [[File:Hoppef.png]] Hans-Hermann Hoppe (0/100) - As if the retarded ancap larping wasn't enough, this "physical removal" stuff is just on another level of stupid.


 * [[File:Obj.png]] Ayn Rand (0/100) - Worst thing Stalin did was let this bitch out of the USSR alive. Objectivism, more like, objectively shit.

Further Information

 * -|Literature=
 * [[File:Globnat.png]] Age of Consent by Harper Perennial (Reading)
 * [[File:Soclib.png]] On Liberty by John Stuart Mill (Planned)
 * -|Wikipedia=
 * [[File:Socdem.png]] Social Democracy
 * [[File:Nordmodel.png]] Nordic Model
 * [[File:Social corpratism.png]] Neo-corporatism
 * [[File:Globnat.png]] Differences with anti-globalization

Political/Compass Unity
Matt in-general is a centrist in this regard, and is willing to work with both moderate leftists and rightists (so long as they're progressive) to achieve political goals. However, he's more willing to work with libertarians than he is with authoritarians, so he would favor libertarian unity over authoritarian unity most of the time. While he isn't against the idea of united fronts against ideologies like fascism, those united fronts shouldn't tolerate undemocratic ideologies. So, if there is to be a united front, this front should be made up of only democratic ideologies, and should be as peaceful as possible. He's willing to work with leftists who reject central planning as their means of production, as centrally planned socialism is bad and ineffective at addressing the needs of the people. So, as long as they are pro-market, and are moderate, he is willing to work with them. Like democratic socialists. With all of this, they have to be socially progressive as well, but not subscribe to the whole elitist intersectional identity politic culture war BS, and should focus on class issues. Largely depends, he will work together with libertarians who are centrists economically the most, but is more apprehensive with working along side people who are economically right-wing. But, so long as they are socially progressive, democratic, and economically moderate, to him, they are allies in the fight for freedom. He generally doesn't get a long with most authoritarians due to his stances on authority, So, there will be little to if any co-operation with authoritarians. Authoritarians who are center are ok given they are progressive, but authoritarians who are anti-democratic are not, and will be flat out refused to co-operate with regardless of what their social stances are. As, being democratic is one of the necessary ideological components for political co-operation. Depends on what type of rightist they are, if they're a neoliberal, then no. They also have to be socially progressive and economically moderate as well, otherwise, in most instances, you will see no co-operation with people on this side of the compass
 * -|Left Unity=
 * -|Libertarian Unity=
 * -|Authoritarian Unity=
 * -|Right Unity=

Navboxes
Regular Navboxes =

Community Navboxes =

Q&A
Q what do you think of the cultural views of hardline mls you mentioned earlier
 * - Feel free to ask me anything within this section. If you want to view old comments, go here.
 * Q UserWiki:DragonRed - Why did you become pan nationalist when you were a anti -nationalist?
 * A - Well I became more nationalist because of my stances on immigration so i figured an ideology that supports both nationalism and internationalism would only make sense to adopt since I never stopped being the former.
 * Q UserWiki:Ninjack-Aus - If all western liberal democracies (IE, NATO/EU) where to collapse, what non-atlanticist ideology would you least dislike to take it's place?
 * A - Well preferably ideologies that allow free and fair elections, anything that isn't utopic that allows for such would be fine by me (mostly). I can't really say, but that's the best answer I can give.
 * Q [[File:Panth.png]] - What are your thoughts on Yan Xishan thought?
 * A - It's conservative and authoritarian, so I don't like it.
 * Q - What's your opinion on the President of Palau, Surangel Whipps Jr?
 * A - i know nothing about the politics of Palau, so idk.

Comments

 * - If you want to make any comments, make them here.


 * Baconsalad - i have no idea why you have such a long pcb page and no i did not read it all. Add me (or update it).


 * - add me
 * - Ok!
 * - Hey, Matteel. Don’t forget to add me when you get the chance!
 * - That's already been done.


 * - Add me here (for the lulz, please and thank you).
 * - ok
 * - Why did you give Gorbachev such a high mark? His ideologies were based, but he was incompetent as hell and didn't do anything to stop kleptocrats like Yeltsin. He was part of why Russia and post-Soviet states are in their current state.
 * - Well i rank him that high because I like him as a figure, sure he didn't do a whole lot to stop that, but I still like the reforms he did make during the time period, even if did cause the eventual decline of the USSR. But you're right, I lowered his ranking I gave him slightly just to take in factor all of that.
 * [[File:Panth.png]] - Who do you simp for?
 * - Well I said I liked progressive democrats, so take anyone there that is anything center of left (although nothing past that) and I probably have a good opinion of them.


 * - Hey man, I have adjusted my review for your page.
 * - Thanks ^.^

Userwiki:Marsvner - dude can you add me in discord? My discord name is marsvner#2980.
 * happy forth of july Westoid ☠️2🇺🇸
 * - Cope commie.
 * My best friend on this site
 * - What do you mean?
 * - I changed many things, update relations on me
 * - Sure thing.
 * - Yo there, add me?
 * - Almost done finishing up my page, give me tomorrow from the point I sent this message


 * [[File:MrsVzrFlag.png]] Marsis [[File:MrsVzr2.png]] - I added you, feel free to add me as well
 * - You will be added to me page
 * - Hi matteel, I'm once again asking your opinion on LiangGuoxiong,he claims to be a trotskyist but keeps flirting in Hongkong LSD,also imma eager to see your opinion of trotskyists inside socdem UK Labour Party.
 * - I don't know who that is unfortunately.
 * - Pls update thnx
 * - Alright, will do.
 * - Ok but this doesn't change the indisputable fact that laissez-faire capitalism is a failure and that free-markets are also a failure and that libertarianism failed us and that neoliberalism is almost as dumb as libertarianism and that John Locke and Adam Smith both oppose libertarianism and that both of them wanted regulation or a government and that John Locke supported taxes and that minarchists and "anarcho-capitalists" which aren't even real anarchists are neo-feudalists who want massive wealth inequality and a class system between the bourgeoisie and the proletariat and that under free-markets more than 40% of food is wasted and thrown in the dumps when they could be used feeding people and that classical liberalism failed 7 times in the span of 50 years and that employers treat their employees badly to maximize profit and that the CEO of a billion-dollar corporation will spend millions to bust unions when they could just let the employees build a union so the employees get represented but they don't because they are greedy and would prefer the extra millions of dollars more than their employees being treated well and that the NAP is stupid and flawed and that libertarians worship the NAP like it's a god and that capitalism makes people greedy and that capitalism needs reform and regulation in order to be successful and that libertarianism and classical liberalism will just lead to crony capitalism with an oligarchy of a few extremely wealthy billionaires while there are people barely getting by and that currently the 3,000 richest people in the world have more wealth than the rest of the world combined and if that doesn't prove that the system is messed up then that proves that you support people working terrible wages to barely get by and that unions are the best counter to tyrannical employers and that the minimum wage should be increased so the employees make more money and that child labor is immoral and that people in third-world countries shouldn't be getting paid such bad wages and that anarcho-capitalism is an oxymoron because there is a class system between the bourgeoisie and the proletariat while anarchy seeks to remove all hierarchy and that anarcho-capitalism should be just renamed to "fascist-capitalism" because it allows the people with a lot of money to control our lives in every way possible however they want and the government isn't there to protect us. (2 extra notes: I didn't make most of the copypasta but I agree with most of it).
 * - I don't know were this came from, but I agree.
 * [[File:MLL.png]] CynicalLibra - Update relations please.


 * Mind updating relations? I did drop the isolationism (but still oppose NATO and military alliances in general, but am open to regional unions provided they fit certain criteria) and I’m more of a progcon rather than a conservative (as it was done during my last days of said conservative stage). Likewise I don’t really take “lesser evils” anymore when it comes to geopolitics (ex: both NATO and Russia/China are bad and that’s what matters, the War in Ukraine is still a capitalist war in the end, despite Ukraine being slightly better as they’re the defender) -
 * - Sure thing. And honestly, I think I was getting a bit too caught up larping as a neocon because it literally made me consider the atlanticist position I hold, I'm probably going to change that position as I just don't agree with the idea that any country deserves its hegemony, not saying I won't stop supporting the West, just that Atlanticism makes it sound like I unconditionally support the west when that's actually not the case. I just hold no sympathies towards authoritarian states.


 * - Steven Crowder is not only a conservative bigot that attacks transgender people for no reason and says racist things, but he also said that people with OCD are pedophiles and deserve to die.
 * - Oh I know.
 * - That's why I consider him to be a neo-fascist rather than a conservative.
 * [[File:Glencoe.png]] Glencoe13- Damn wouldn't be surprised

Glencoe13- hey tony here add me plz link to ideology: https://polcompballanarchy.miraheze.org/wiki/Glencoeism
 * - Ok.
 * - Hello Matteel, care to update relations? I no longer consider myself truly conservative socialist anymore nor would I necessarily describe myself as "conservative in the first world" any longer.
 * - Sure thing.
 * [[File:Scripper.png]] Scripper - Add me.
 * - Will do.
 * [[File:Ethplur.png]] [[File:Esofash.png]] [[File:Crusadism.png]] NewCato: Mate, you trying to be unique? You're kind of basic to be honest. Though most the things you say are quite garbage. Also your opinion is invalid since you are a globetard.
 * - dc + didn't ask + ratio and ur gay.
 * [[File:Glencoe.png]] Glencoe - damn fabuis is that you?
 * - When was there any indication this was Fabius?
 * **[[File:Glencoe.png]] Glencoe - he called you fake American at first,Changed Fabius quickly BREHNES page and BREHNES said fabuis was coming back.
 * [[File:Esofash.png]] NewCato:Bringing back the black and tans?
 * [[File:Rebel_Alliance.png]] CarbynSobek - Add me?


 * - "I should be the controller of my own body and life choices from all governing authorities, but disregarding morality entirely is cringe for me." - So you admit that morality should "control" you, it should be your governing authority. Stirner is not immoral, nor does he remove evaulative language. The role of morality, especially as a universal system places the individual under it, so if you truly valued yourself above anything, it would also include morality. But this does not mean you cannot value others, or their wellbeing. But if it comes down to it, are you going to limit yourself for another side of yourself, i.e. sacrifice yourself because you could not live without the other, or are you going to sacrifice yourself because your life and personal value was already forfeit and under the heel of "the right thing to do"?
 * What's your current opinion on the American school system right now? Like what they teach, are they time efficient, do they need to get reformed, do you believe in all those memes Etc.
 * [[File:brainrust.png]] BrainRust123 - Add? [[File:TheElectricBomb.png]] TEB - I uopdated relations with you, so do the same. (Also, From what I know, Post-modernism isn't basically "fuck society", it goes like "everything has it's own definition so grand narratives are bullshit", from what I know)