UserWiki:DragonRed

}

On socialist patriotism and cultural patriotism
Socialist patriotism is a form of socialism based on cultural patriotism. cultural patriotism ; It is based on the love and reverence of national culture. Therefore, those who come from different origins; they can show love and respect for the national culture. The sum of the local cultures forms the national culture. Mutual love and respect for the local culture. It also forms the basis of national culture. Of course, it will be on the condition of taking the useful and beautiful part of the local culture. The sum of the useful and beautiful parts of the local culture will form our national culture.

For this, folklore will be established. Folklore or folklore examines the cultural products, oral literature, traditions, customs, beliefs, foods, music, games and folk remedies of people living in a country or region, and we will examine their interrelationships such as source and evolution. How does society think? How does he speak? How happy does she feel? How does he like music and what food? Who are the popular artists? How does society treat itself? Research will be done on them. Appropriate ones are determined; A sense of cultural patriotism will be instilled in the society through the media.

Its origin dates back to the beginning of history; "epics", in which "half-history, half-legendary life and heroism of nations and heroes" are mentioned, depict the sacred values ​​of the nation, its intellectual, artistic and political life, etc. it reflects. Although it is not history, we find the highest love of homeland and nation, as well as the joy and worry of the society, customs and traditions, state administration, economy, way of life, which are evaluated that way when necessary. The epics also help us to create common joy and common concern for the society. Making a nation a nation; Those who rejoice together and grieve together are called the nation. This is what makes a nation a nation.

In the "anecdotes" that are told depending on a certain historical person with the anonymous ones, the intelligence of the people, their responsiveness, their desires, their values, traditions and customs, their sense of humor, etc. it is impossible not to see. The most important aspect of the anecdotes based on the principle of "strengthening the proposed idea by giving an example, convincing the other party to believe him and showing him wrong" is to draw a stake from the story. Regiment criticism, satire and comedy, etc. In this type of narrative, in which the elements are of different weight, both to teach a lesson and to prevent a possible mistake; as well as its ability to make people laugh and entertain, makes it very effective in bringing people of all ages to the good, the truth and the beautiful. This helps the nation to distinguish between moral good and right, beneficial and harmful, and also entertains while reading. If a nation is having fun, there is unity. Having fun is necessary for the unity and solidarity of the nation.

"Proverbs" and "idioms", which are said in order to bring an example in a specific and necessary place, to prevent a possible mistake, to give advice, and to strengthen the defended idea, have also assumed the same function. In such narratives, which emerge mostly through analogy, we find the folk thought system, value judgments, lifestyle, traditions and customs. The "feature from the story" feature in our proverbs and idioms has made them be seen as an effective way of guiding people of all ages, children, youth and adults. While doing these, through books, theaters, music, movies, cartoons; cultural patriotism awareness will be instilled.

What will the secular society order be like
The state; religious budget; science, industry, culture, education, arts and sports should be distributed equally. The state should confiscate the lands and properties of religious institutions and religious foundations. Then the lands and properties should be given to the public. It should leave religious institutions unsourced. religious institutions; it should become more dependent on the state and more controllable by the state. Religious temples should turn into schools, hospitals, workshops and gymnasiums. Religious temples should also be worship. Religious clothing should be free. The state should abolish religious education. People from different religions and sects should worship. Religious schools should be turned into vocational schools.religions; should be taught as history and culture.

In schools; evolution and materialism must be taught...

My Opinion About LGBT
I am neither pro-LGBT nor anti-LGBT. I'm neutral on LGBT. I am not homophobic or transphobic. People of the same sex like each other just like normal people like the opposite sex. Heterosexuality and homosexuality/biosexuality are gender orientations. Homosexuality is not perversion. It is nature's control mechanism. There are cases of homosexuality in animals. True perversion is pedophilia. Whether it's a pedophile of the opposite sex or a gay pedophile; these are perversions. Because one side gets hurt, it's the kids. We need to protect children from pedophiles. As for trans people, trans people are gay. if there will be a trans surgery; Trans surgeries should be done under state control. I am against transgender surgery in children. It harms children. It can be same-sex marriage. Adoption of gay and transgender people is unnecessary. Homosexual/transgender must be stated on IDs. People have two genders. Male and female, no other gender Male and female determine gender identity. Hermaphrodite is a genetic disease. It can be corrected with surgery. If she wants to be a woman, a woman; If he wants to be a man, he can be a man. This is normal. Zoophilia is the name of perversion against animals. It should definitely be resisted. As I said, postgenderism is an ideology that seeks to abolish gender. The genders should remain as they are. postgenderism, pedophile, zoophile should be fought. Homosexual and transgender people should not be discriminated against; We must develop them according to their abilities.

Super
1.Vladimir Lenin (100/100)- Great job and New Economic Policy to overthrow the tsarist regime, remove Russia from being an imperialist power that slaughters the people, starves the peasants, and brings the necessary social changes to Russia that empowers the poor, peasants and women. and almost everything you do for Russia is positive. You paved the way for a great Russia. My deepest respects to you.

2.Kim Il Sung (100/100)- I hope you won the Korean war and killed that US puppet Syngman Rhee. It's based on the Juche concept and it's great that you want the Socialist bloc to unite and support many anti-imperialists like Nyerere and Nasser. You have taken a strong hand to perfectly build North Korea in its material conditions and you truly understand how to run a country. In the 3-volume Marxist Regimes - A Study of the World by US liberal historian Professor Bruce (published by MacMillan) Cummings; from the 1950s to the 1970s; It was reported that Korea's economic growth is 23.5 percent annually. This is truly incredible. You put this even above the 20% annual growth rate achieved in the Soviet Union during the Stalin era in the 1930s. From 1957 to 1960 the total value of industrial production increased 3.5 times. From 1957 to 1970, industrial production grew at a high rate of 19.1% on average each year, transforming into a developed socialist industrial state in a short period of 14 years. From 1970 to 1979, industrial production grew at an average annual rate of 15.9%. This guy is great.

3.Sun Yat-Sen (100/100) — you were gigachad and your ideology is very strong, I respect you. A hero of China and the ancient ruler of True China. Rest in peace Sun.

4.Mustafa Kemal Atatürk (100/100) — Long live Mustafa Kemal Pasha! Turkey's greatest ruler, father of ROT, great leader and ideologue, progressive nationalist and social feminist. RIP Kamal.

5.Şevket Süreyya Aydemir (100/100)- Turkish Nationalism and Marxism would unite with Leninism if you were in power in Turkey. I can't see any fault with you. Incredibly simple.

6.Doğan Avcıoğlu(100/100)- Incredibly strong, just like above. Turkey's Left Kemalists, such as Liao Zhongkai and Li Dazhao, who defended Atatürk and tried to unite Marxism-Leninism. incredible respect

7.Joseph Stalin(90/100)- Son. At times I wondered where to put you because on the one hand you mapped out one of the greatest ideologies that saw the liberation of billions of people from Imperialism, Fascism and Colonialism. You had projects on your own that transformed the industrialization that took the rest of Europe 200 years and succeeded in almost two decades, helped to industrialize Eastern Europe, to get rid of Nazi Germany, and your social and cultural policies were very fundamental, but I am from the Turkish Straits crisis, the Baltic' I don't like deportations (although it's understandable that you want to protect them from Hitler), but that's it for your case. But thank you for being an inspiration to Marxism-Leninism and an idol for many socialist movements.

8.Georgi Dimitrov (100/100)- Proletarian Internationalism itself (not Globalism, but the grounded kind), also praise for how you resisted Tito's attempts to imperialize Bulgaria. Your legacy is highly appreciated in Bulgaria today and much of Modern Bulgaria's infrastructures and things they enjoy cannot exist without you. Incredibly basic.

9.Che Guevara (100/100)- An inspiration to the people of Latin America to fight against the bloody dictatorships in Latin America backed by the American imperialists. based. You are a symbol of international freedom, I have great respect for you.

10.Vo Nguyen Giap(100/100)- Long live your victory in the war in Dien Bien and it is a symbol of the victory of humanity and humans over evil.

11.Valko Chervenkov (98/100)- Your rapid industrialization, your struggle against fascism, collectivization and similar policies have contributed a lot to Bulgaria. One of the best in Communist Eastern Europe. Endless respect to you.

12. Andrija Hebrang (98/100)- Followed the communist line, played an important role in the industrialization of Yugoslavia, promoted racial unity and ethnic fraternity and helped chase away the fascist filth. What can I say other than to hold on? One of the truly real socialists from SFRY.

13.Gheorghe Georgiu Dej (97/100)- Despite being a Stalinist conservative, you helped Romania get rid of the Nazis, Industrialize Romania and your positive policies as Chervenkov did for Bulgaria and became an independent path and almost National for Romania. Communication. communism What else can I say besides this? My only problem with you is the Sov-Rom companies thing, otherwise you are perfect. The best of all the early communist leaders of Eastern Europe

14.Augusto Cesar Sandino (97/100)- It is a very basic idea to want to liberate your country and apply your values ​​to it. Long live the idea of ​​Sandinism! Unfortunately, Ortega does more stupid things in his home country.

15.Jose De San Martin (97/100)- Hero of Chile, Peru and Argentina, a great, heroic anti-imperialist who fought against the barbarian Spanish Imperialists for the independence of his country. A hero like the Argentinean Jose Marti.

16.Boleslaw Bierut (96/100)- When I read you I had a hard time deciding where to put it. Lots of internal improvements as you rapidly industrialized Poland on the one hand and built it after the Nazis razed it. But lately I really like your Left Nationalism and your ideals. This is very basic.

17. Blas Roca Caldera (96/100)- Cuban Zhou Enlai. He helped establish the proper Cuban Socialist structure and carry it to a new pinnacle of success. Incredibly irresistible.

18. Eduardo Artes (96/100)- Your Allende-like social policies are baseless, your support for North Korea and your liberal criticism of "human rights" and gusanos are hella-based. I prefer you to any Chilean islander. This is very basic. Only you won. Reformism is embarrassing, but overall you're very good.

19.Kwame Nkrumah (96/100)- You led Ghana on the path of Socialism, Nationalism and anti-imperialism, led the global struggle against colonialism and generally a hero for the liberation of Africa from the clutches of the Imperialists. But you're too soft for my taste.

20.Farabundo Marti (96/100)- He wanted to help the poor in your country and fought brave wars against the imperialist powers and then the fascist Maximilliano regime. Maximilliano should be killed for you

21.Kim Jong il (95/100)- When you became the Chairman of the State Affairs Commission, namely the Supreme Leader in 1994, there were some nutritional problems across North Korea due to natural disasters and sanctions. You have overcome these problems with a basic industrial policy. You developed in the military field. You understand that the army is a vital need to build a solid socialist country. In the 1990s, a breakthrough program was implemented for the defense of the country in the defense industry against the increasing threat of the USA. Thus, despite the negative economic and political atmosphere created by the collapse of the USSR, you managed to keep the DPRK on the path to socialism. You have laid a solid foundation for increasing energy production by constructing large, medium and small hydroelectric power plants. Besides, you have had surprising success in building and launching man-made earth satellites with the country's own efforts. After hard trials, you have radically increased the potential for agricultural production by converting the entire country's farmland into large standard plots and constructing gravitational waterways. Based man.

22.France-Albert René (94/100) - Probably the best African leader ever to make Syechelles a prosperous and free country and resist American imperialism. You also democratized Syechelles and successfully reformed the ML dictatorship regime. Gorbachev should have learned from you.

23.Getuli Vargas (93/100) - Hero of Brazil and a leading fighter against the Axis, an ally of FDR who greatly improved welfare and workers' rights in Brazil. Leaders like you are exactly what modern Brazil needs. Banned the Nazis in Brazil. Democrat elected. and returned to the presidency. Based on your positivism

24.Evo Morales (92/100) — Bolivia's greatest leader, you are gigachad and grounded. Neocucks fired you and that's too bad! But you know Crimean russian, it's a shame. But I support you, don't.

25.Juan Velasco Alvarado (92/100) - another anti-imperialist, great leader and liberator of Peru from the arms of the neocucks. But then they sacked you and Morales Bermudes destroyed your reforms and actions! RIP Velasco

26.Deniz Gezmiş(91/100)- Turkey's Thalmann/Guevara. Unlike Öcalan, Kaypakkaya is a true revolutionary and socialist. He is the type of person I respect a lot.

27. Vedat Nedim Tor(91-100) Same as above but better and more radical

28.Thomas Sankara (90/100) — the greatest communist leader, you have done many wonderful things, rest in peace. Neocucks spoil everything and always.

29. Klement Gottwald (90/100)- You did a good job in fighting Nazism in Czechoslovakia, nationalizing key industries and resolving socioeconomic problems between Czechs and Slovaks. He is for sure the best leader of communist Czechoslovakia.

30.Simon Bolivar (90/100)- Your Gran Colombia project will come true and you are a heroic son of South America fighting against the filthy Spaniards. However, the invader Peru is gay.

31.Jose Carlos Mariategui (90/100)- One of America's leading Anti-Imperialist Marxists, no Peruvian has impressed me as much as you. based.

32.Milli Chief İsmet İnönü (90/100) - You left the path of establishing a free and secular multi-party republic by strengthening Atatürk's one-party state. However, your smart foreign policies saved Turkey from World War II and Nazi occupation. You also protected it from Hitler's imperialist ambition. You have taken secularism as a basis. It is based on wealth tax. You supported China against the Japanese imperialists.

33.Chen Yun (90/100)- The grand architect of the opening (which is sneaky), the moderate criticizing Mao's radical policies that hurt China and led China to economic recovery, and then the conservative who opposed Deng's more radical policies You had reforms and very basic Social policies.

34. Mirsaid Sultan-Galiev (90/100)- Anti-Imperialism, Anti-Colonialism, National Communism etc. All of them are deeply rooted and demand the unity of the third world in the struggle for self-determination. This is very basic. Stalin made a mistake in liquidating you. However, your advocacy for a more decentralized system is not very good, especially given the situation in the USSR at that time.

35.Alexander Lukashenko (90/100)- good guy on the basis of your anti-imperialist stance towards Chad, NATO and the EU to solve the problems affecting the former Soviet states in Belarus through your core economy

36. Miguel Diaz Canel (90/100)- Your technocratic views and the collapse of radical conservatism in the Cuban government are gigantic. Also well done, keep pushing the Americans and the Gusano puppets in Cuba.

37. Lazaro Cardenas (90/100) - So is amnesty for nativist, left-nationalist, socauth and political prisoners, and repealing the Calles law. You are my favorite leader in both Mexico and Latin America. It's a shame the PRI has turned itself into a kleptocratic party.

38.Wang Dongxing(90-100) liquidated the Gang of Four, helped end the Cultural Revolution, but criticizes the Capitalist mentality while criticizing economic reforms and revisionism. You are very loyal to Mao even if you personally oppose the Red Guards, but your kindness makes up for everything.

39.Wilhelm Pieck (89/100)- Founder of the Socialist DDR and a hero against the Nazis and Social Democrats. Incredibly basic. You and Ulbricht have formed the best and most moral German government possible.

40. Walter Ulbricht (89/100)- He had good intentions to develop Germany and fight Nazism well, but ordering the construction of the Berlin Wall was the right move. The New Economic System and your other internal policies were so fundamental, I give you this.

41.Fidel Castro (88/100) — the greatest anti-imperialist politician, the protector of Cuban independence, I respect you very much. You were the great leader. It's a shame these American neocucks put an embargo on you!

42. Raul Castro (88/100) — same as above but more perfect, because he advocates free market and cultural progressivism. He's great. Your economic reforms opened Cuba to market reforms (lie) while you continued the (basic) good work that Fidel did in Cuba.

43.Mohammad Mossadegh (88/100) - would be the great Iranian reformer and Iran Ataturk. It is based on secularism, liberal social authoritarianism, reformism and the nationalization of the British oil company and is red-columned. Your social and economic reforms are great. You've been wrongfully beaten by the Neocucks. You and Atatürk are the two best leaders of the Middle East. RIP, legend.

44.Habib Bourguiba (88/100) - Tunisian Atatürk made great contributions to the educational and social development of the country by liberating Tunisia from the French domination and the reactionary monarchy.

45.Enver Hodja (87/100)- Your instructions were correct in your early years. Your reforms of literacy, industrialization and the life of the Albanian people are grounded, but your stance on religion is unfounded, and your isolationism (has stagnated. Albanian economy. Also, thanks for helping us beat ROC. If only you weren't overly paranoid and anti-religious, you should be less radical. Oblique manners. My only problem with you is your stance on religion and a bit of isolation, but other than that, your achievements are 100% electrification in just THREE years, building the country's first railroads, great progress in areas like education, health, and eliminating multiple things. diseases and epidemics, how can no one praise your achievements? But then it was very embarrassing to finance the Kosovo Liberation Army (even if you didn't know they were terrorists after death).

46.David Alfaro Siqueiros (87/100)- A strong, staunchly devoted Marxist-Leninist and even tried to kill Trotsky himself. Respect people like you.

47.Matyas Rakosi (86/100)- While it's good for you to get rid of the Nazi puppet regime Szalasi, some of your policies, while relatively well-intentioned, have resulted in major failures (thanks anticoms and atlanticoids). While not all of these were failures, some of your industrial policies were very grounded, such as ridding Hungary of the legacy of fascism and poverty. Damn, you are the founder of Socialism in Hungary, it's a shame that revisionists and atlanticoids slander your achievements. We could have had great successes, unfortunately anticommunication stopped all your progress for Hungary.

48.Nikos Zachariadis (86/100)- The struggle for national liberation from the enraged Greek Junta, the Nazis and the British Imperialists was grounded, and Left Nationalism is and will be incredibly grounded. Socialist Patriotism too. Fuck the Khrushchevite Revisionists for betraying you.

49.Xi Jinping (85/100)- Not as the anti-Chinese media portrays him. He continued Hu Jintao's technological, economic and social advances, and the One Belt One Road, Moderate Prosperous Society and program to eradicate extreme poverty is something only gigachads can achieve. I also like your strict anti-Western stance. Destroy the West at this point.

50. Khorloogjin Choibalsan (85/100)- Modernizing Mongolia, liberating it from the reactionary Beiyang Clique, and fighting against the Japanese Imperialists is based on your rapid industrialization, literate development, and wide recognition of Mongolia's independence, but you are too dependent on the Soviets. Purging theocrats is essential

51.Nie Rongzhen (85/100)- Responsible for the PLA modernization, helped Mao develop the Nuclear Weapons program, and is responsible for many modernizations China has gone through. This is very basic.

52.Bülent Ecevit (85/100) - Good job continuing the CHP's left-of-center line drawn by İnönü and developing modern Turkish social democratic theory and improving Turkey's economy and social policies. It is essential to save the Turkish Cypriots from the racist fascist Greek gangsters.

Good
1.Kim Jong Un (84/100)-In  2015, April 2016 and September 2016, you have grown North Korea very quickly. Indeed, you have achieved a growth rate that is difficult to imagine in capitalist countries. In the imperialist world, huge construction projects that will cost billions, such as Changjon Street, Mirae Scientists Street, Paetusan Youth Power Plant and Science-Technology Complex, have not only progressed, but completed. 2013 you crushed the revisionist, sectarian currents. You are still the hope of socialism

2.Vlado Dapcevic (84/100)- Proletarian internationalism fought the fascists in the second world war and defended proletarian internationalism, hoping to establish real communism instead of what Tito did in his later years. What can I say other than to hold on?

3.Petru Groza (84/100)- Another great man who worked hard to bring socialist Romania to its glory. It's very fundamental.

4. Antonin Zapotocky (84/100)- Sticking to collective leadership, Fighting the Nazis, and following Gottwald's path, though a little more moderate, albeit very grounded.

5.Carlos Fonesca (84/100)- Built schools and helped liberate the people of Nicaragua from the genocidal Somoza regime, and did a lot of good to the people of Nicaragua. A shame you had to be killed so early.

6.Kaysone Phomvihane (83/100)- Fought the Lao Monarchy, sought to improve the lives of its citizens, and proclaimed Laos a permanent People's Democratic Republic. It looks like Ho Chi Minh and that's a good thing.

7.Giuseppe Garibaldi (83/100)- Very moderate, but you are Italian Sun Yat Sen. One of the first Socialists who deserved everyone's admiration and fought to reunite Italy. Extremely based

8.Hu Chunhua (83/100)- Oversaw economic and social developments in both Tibet, Inner Mongolia and later Guangdong, got rid of friendly capitalism, purged corruption, abandoned neoliberalism and capitalism, very fundamental, but you You are very mild.

9.Grover Furr (83/100)- Good to see you debunking many myths about communism and Stalin, one of the few truly educated and intelligent Western academics. People should get to know you more and read you more.

10.Joao Goulart (83/100)- He had good social programs that lifted the poor out of poverty, increased welfare and improved the health and education systems that were good for all of Brazil, as well as improving the Brazilian economy. based. Unfortunately, American-backed scumbags have to topple you. However, you are a reformist and very moderate who did not change the system, which eventually led to your downfall

11.Yang Shangkun (83/100)- Supporting Deng's economic reform isn't bad even if you think that's the only way for China to get out, but otherwise, you're very grounded, especially your liking for NEP, managing Tiananmen and Jiang to be against.

12.Nexhmije Hoxha (83/100)- She did her best to support her husband's career in making Albania a great socialist republic and you have been very helpful. The only problem is that you supported Alia afterwards. Otherwise, you become an Albanian Peng Liyuan.

13.Aris Velouchiotis (83/100)- A little too radical, but you are a hero trying to save Greece from fascism and imperialism. A brave man I will always respect.

14.Yakup Kadri Karaosmanoglu (82/100)- A very moderate but deeply rooted Socialist who opposes the Atlanticist puppet Menderes. Plus, you had some good ideas too, just be more communist and radical. M

15.Ana Pauker (82/100)- Cleaning up liberals, fashoids and succes is incredibly groundbreaking and you've helped Georgiu Dej on many programs. I'm not sure about some of your ruthless behavior (and some tolerance for Kulaks) but other than that, it's fine.

16.Urho Kekkonen (82/100)- Unlike Mannerheim, you are actually a positive figure for Finland, as your foreign policy you did your part as a buffer between the two blocs and kept the peace even though you had support for free signalers. There was also good stability

17.Ahmed Ben Bella (81/100) - The founding father of Algeria, who defeated the genocidal French imperialists, built a robust market socialist economy, created an independent National road and helped the western imperialists cope. However, you have been a vocal supporter of democracy and your foreign policy has been gigachad.

18. Vyacheslav Molotov (81/100)- Supervised collectivization in the USSR and contributed much to the very foundational and successful First Five-Year Plan and is one of the key figures in the USSR who is still firmly opposed to Revisionism. One of the most established politicians of the USSR...

19.Wojcieich Jaruzelski (80/100)-. Although you have declared martial law in Poland, I can somewhat understand why you did it. Western Influence is growing and you wanted to protect Poland from both the West and a Brezhnev invasion as they did to Czechoslovakia. While I don't like your failures to save socialism's reputation in Poland as well as being very allied and cordial with Brezhnev, he's good overall and one of the least bad revisionists despite not fully returning to (better than most Marketsocs),

20.Erich Honecker (80/100)- Probably one of the greatest people Germany could ever produce. It improved living standards, rejected western neoliberalism to reunite Germany, and had many good policies of industrialization and the like. However, it is bad to fully support Brezhnev, otherwise you are the hope of creating a solid beacon of Socialism in the West and YOU must be the model for the West to follow. But it's also rude to tolerate the corruption of others, as Mielke did, and to be too close to the Brezhnevi otherwise you're fine in my book, although the model of market socialism you're planning is based.

21.Omar Torrijos (80/100)- Redistributed land to peasants, nationalized the Panama Canal, treated your people greatly and your economics are wise. You should rule Panama for eternity. However, you're too moderate.

22.GamalAbdel Nasser (80/100) – Egypt's great leader and socialist, but your actions against the Jews were terrible. But I support you against the ziontards and the neocucks

23.Pham Van Dong (78/100)- A more moderate version of Vietnam's Molotov, followed Bac Ho's legacy to the end and tried to clean up corruption but still very much we are fine.

24.Pen Sovan(77/100)- You are one of the best people in history. As you move towards the policy of National Communism for Cambodia, you formed an organization that created the People's Republic of Kampuchea, the best government in Cambodia's History, liberating your country from Pol Pot. Even that makes you gigachad, but a little too mild for my liking and still too obedient to Le Duan.

25.Salvador Allende (77/100) — you're democratic enough because socialism is the way to democracy is cool, but neocucks interfered with you! Cybersyn would be great. Rest in peace Salvador Allende.

26.Lazar Kaganovich (76/100)- I condemn your failed policies that led to famine (even if the kulaks are more responsible), but you are responsible for overseeing many of the good things that happen in Stalinist Russia, a bit like Molotov, I'll give you on that.

27.Gennady Zyuganov (75/100)- Your views against the vigilantes and lgbtoid nonsense are hell-based and your nationalism and your wish to return Russia to its former glory under Socialism are curse-based. I wish you to win so that Russia gains its new hope.

28.Ceausescu(75/100) Ceausescu did what was best for his country. All religions were allowed, only extremists were punished. It was grounded to try to leave URSS as it was very revisionist at the time. After the 80s, it adopted some market reforms. You're not such a bad communist. Romania fell when you fell.

29.Hugo Chavez (75/100) — you are the great fighter of American neouckservatism and imperialism, I respect you. But your actions caused the crisis in Venezuela. I support you though, don't do it to them. RIP Chavez.

30.Egon Krenz (74/100)- Slightly similar to the East German Xi, but much more moderate and I used to think of you as a Moderate Honeckerist (which is normal, I guess), but you wanted to turn East Germany into a real Market Socialist Hungary like a country under the ML framework and wanted to get rid of the corruption in the GDR. It's a shame that Gorbachev had to ruin everything and sell East Germany to the Westoids and you were a bit too moderate ..

31.Nguyen Van Linh (73/100)- I don't understand why he was called Vietnamese Gorbachev when Gorbachev was an idiot and a traitor and Van Linh was a genius. Corruption descended on him, and after Le Duan screwed everything up, he fixed the economic problems Vietnam was facing. He is one of the greatest people to ever set foot on earth. However, Doi Moi was a terrible idea, even better than China since it didn't bring too many problems, but still Market Socialism is good. However, you are the least evil of them all.

32.Wen Jiabao (73/100)- You would be one of the best if it wasn't for your corruption, otherwise your positive policies towards farmers and your contribution to the economy (second man behind Hu) are respected. But you're a little too liberal for my taste.

33.Deng Xiaoping (73/100)You stopped the events that would cause the collapse of China as well as the Soviet Union. If the Chinese Gorbachev and Yeltsin had been the leader of the country, they would have suffered the same fate as the Soviets. At least you did not allow the country's resources to be plundered like Gorbachev. You helped the development of your country. You also blocked the rise of people like Hu Yaobang (Chinese Gorbachev Zhao Ziyang (Chinese Yeltsin). But you did nothing about factionalism in the party and the massive decline of workers' rights. You supported kaki-historical puppets like Najibullah and Le Duan. You supported the Mujahideen in Afghanistan and Vietnam. you invaded you supported tyrants and terrorists like Pol Pot you supported the person who killed the welfare system like Jiang Zemin. Yet you are better than them when Gorbachev compares to Khrushchev. You have rooted communism in China.

34.Nguyen Phu Trong (70/100)- Vietnamese Xi Jinping. Liberal Democracy is and will be a corrupt concept. You are today's best and perfect. In general, the economy is fine, however. you are very good and your limitations are weak too, too  and close with detailed...

35.Janos Kadar (70/100) Hungary's living standards have improved. He had some good policies. But even if you opposed Brezhnev's invasion of Czechoslakia, you were too much of a Brezhnev/Khrushchev puppet for my liking. Besides being too moderate, he surrendered to the markets

Neutral
Xi Jinping (55/100)- Not as anti-Chinese media portrays him. He continued Hu Jintao's technological, economic and social advances, and the One Belt One Road, Moderate Prosperous Society and program to eradicate extreme poverty is something only gigachads can achieve. I also like your strict anti-Western stance. But you are not doing anything to reduce the power of the private sector. It is also dangerous to choose you against the American/Western imperialists. You are putting countries in debt and crashing the country's resources. More ; You have the most income inequality in the world. You are imperialists, painted red. You are also sabotaging the North Korean economy. You also stopped helping. You were also against the nuclear issue of North Korea defending itself against the imperialist.

Kan Abe (63/100)- Right-wing ideology is scary, but you are one of the people I can stand because you want to end the war and go against Hideki Tojo. It's a shame that your grandson is a terrible prime minister.

Tetsuzo Fuwa (68/100)- Revisionist and Reformism is definitely not cool, But I am very interested in your theories of Scientific Socialism and how to achieve Socialism step by step.

Kim Gu (66/100)- fought for Korea's independence from the Japanese and had similar views on Nationalism as Sun Yat Sen. It's a shame, Rhee, that a beloved man like you was killed by that US holocaust puppet, Syngman. You would work by the people, for the people, for an independent Korea. Generalissimo Kim Il Sung admires you and will fulfill your great ideals to the fullest. However, even if Anti-Communism is too shy and Kim Il Sung is willing to make concessions, you have prevented the reunification of Korea. While grounded in some of your ideals and you're certainly better than the Revisionist North and the Capitalist South right now, you'll be a right-leaning socauth at best. Excuse me.

Lyuh Woon Hyung (67/100)- Too moderate but other than that you are too basic. Like the Korean Chiang Ching Kuo, he strove for Socialism and worked for reunification. I support your cause forever. Shame on you Western-backed far-right anti-Communist scum killed you and your dreams of reunification

Yan Xishan (67/100)- Supporting Chiang and being against the CCP is idiocy (at least even then you know the Japanese are worse unlike Chiang who doesn't know his priorities) but other than that everything about you is grounded. Preserved traditions, good land reforms owned, socialism etc. It's very sad that you have to make an alliance with a man who doesn't like you.

Wang Ming (63/100)- Fierce Marxist-Leninist adhered to the true principles of Marxist-Leninism against Maoist revisionism, suppressed Trotskyism, but could have been more militarily proficient and less dogmatic and more independent from Moscow.

Deng Xiaoping (53/100)You stopped the events that would cause the collapse of China as well as the Soviet Union. If the Chinese Gorbachev and Yeltsin had been the leader of the country, they would have suffered the same fate as the Soviets. At least you did not allow the country's resources to be plundered like Gorbachev. You helped the development of your country. You also blocked the rise of people like Hu Yaobang (Chinese Gorbachev Zhao Ziyang (Chinese Yeltsin). But you did nothing about factionalism in the party and the massive decline of workers' rights. You supported kaki-historical puppets like Najibullah and Le Duan. You supported the Mujahideen in Afghanistan and Vietnam, you invaded, you supported tyrants and terrorists like Pol Pot, you supported the person who murdered the welfare system like Jiang Zemin, but you are better than them compared to Gorbachev, Khrushchev, you rooted communism. In China but you hurt in China. You exposed income inequality. You did nothing. You allied with the West and did nothing about the factionalism in the party below you and the massive decline in workers' rights. The occupation of Vietnam is also shameful.

Abd al-Karim Qasim (62/100)- Not being able to stop the political chaos and purge the communists was a complete ass move, but your social and economic reforms at home were very fundamental, as was your opposition to the West. Yasser Arafat (66/100)- Some of your tactics are dubious and have discredited the PLO, but you are an all-encompassing symbol of Palestinian resistance to Israel.

Grigory Arutinov (61/100)- Anti-Stalinist agarian socialist, ally of Beria and a revisionist, but thank you for some of the most positive developments you have brought to Soviet-era Armenia.

Leopold Sedar Senghor (67/100)- It's great to free Senegal and have positive policies for it. Your only fault is that you are friendly with the West and are too moderate with revisionism.

Modibo Keita (60/100)- Good for wanting a Pan-Africanist nation of people to work together to fight the French imperialists, although your economy isn't perfect and you're too moderate for my taste, overall you're still fine. I.

Ahmed Sekou Toure (62/100)- They also had good intentions to want a Pan-African union against the Imperialists based on good ideology and liberating Guinea from the French, however, Camp Boiro and some of your economic failures are pulling you down, otherwise you'll be grounded.

Aden Adde (61/100)- One of Africa's greatest people and perhaps my favorite leader from the Horn of Africa. He liberated Somalia and supported the Somali Nationalist Union and sought to destroy the genocidal legacy of colonialism. However, you are very moderate.

Abdul Razak Hussein (62/100)- He had a more maladaptive foreign policy, helped us build relations with the PRC, solved racial problems with the multi-basic Malaysian New Economic Policy, by reducing Malaysia's poverty level, trying to get rid of Malay. After identity politics and the ineptitude of Tunku Abdul Rahman, he unraveled the chaos. Alas, your son and later leaders ruined everything.

Hussein Onn (60/100)- Fought against the drug problem and resolved the problems of racial economic imbalances for a united Malaysia. based. But please embrace Socialism but you haven't accomplished much other than continuing Abdul Razak's programmes.

Sudisman (66/100)- While I'm not entirely comfortable with you, I believe you joined the September 30 Movement (which is somewhat correct but I doubt you wanted to betray Sukarno) and some are shady acts, but really Suhartoist, Anti-communist and Western You are demonized by his propaganda.

BJ Habibie (66/100)- true patriot of the Indonesian people. Perfect man. It was he, not Suharto, who made the Indonesian economy strong, and he also ended the genocide and the terrible things Suharto did during his reign of terror and murder. Very mild, but still good.

Ben Chifley (65/100)- Like John Curtin, you are one of the only Australian prime ministers who deserves my respect because your domestic reforms are so good and you have fought fashionistas in Japan, but anti-communism is not. good, yet you opposed the Cold War and what the Atlanticoids did to Malaysia. It's a bit like the Palme of Australia.

Norman Kirk (62/100)- The above, but for New Zealand, but very moderate and liberal, and also did not survive the British influence.

Zulfikar Ali Bhutto (67/100)- Major social policies and reforms are great for the average Pakistani. He is my favorite Pakistani leader and what he did to his country was almost flawless, but you didn't fundamentally change Pakistan's system to become a Marxist-Leninist and you had some failures.

Mohammed Zahir Shah (65/100)- He has done many positive progressive reforms for Afghanistan and has done very well at home, one of the few good rulers. I really don't like your economic failures.

Yasser Arafat (66/100)- Some of your tactics are dubious and have discredited the PLO, but you are an all-encompassing symbol of Palestinian resistance to Israel.

Mahmoud Abbas (65/100)- He does not advocate radical actions, instead he chose the best way to fight against Israel, but thanks to Israel, Islamic fundamentalists are on the rise. But although you are a progressive figure, you are too moderate.

Leopold Sedar Senghor (67/100)- It's great to free Senegal and have positive policies for it. Your only fault is that you are friendly with the West and are too moderate with revisionism. Modibo Keita (60/100)- Good for wanting a Pan-Africanist nation of people to work together to fight the French imperialists, although your economy isn't perfect and you're too moderate for my taste, overall you're still fine. I. Ahmed Sekou Toure (62/100)- They also had good intentions to want a Pan-African union against the Imperialists based on good ideology and liberating Guinea from the French, however, Camp Boiro and some of your economic failures are pulling you down, otherwise you'll be grounded. Aden Adde (61/100)- One of Africa's greatest people and perhaps my favorite leader from the Horn of Africa. He liberated Somalia and supported the Somali Nationalist Union and sought to destroy the genocidal legacy of colonialism. However, you are very moderate.

Barthelemy Boganda (62/100)- One of the leading figures in Africa's struggle for independence and liberated your country from the French colonialists. Your party is established and your country is great, until Bokassa ruins everything, albeit a very moderate one.

Julius Nyerere (65/100)- Overthrowing the genocidal regime of Idi Amin, a stronghold against imperialism and a hero for the African people, and a great freedom fighter who incited many Africans to revolt against the colonialists. Market Socialism is delayed, albeit very moderate and Stable, but otherwise very good.

Seretse Khama (64/100)- Well indeed you are the least bad Capitalist but still a capitalist which is arrogance but I have to really thank you for the Advancements you have brought to Botswana and the wealth as well as your opposition to Apartheid regimes. It's pretty good, friendly with China and North Korea.

Jason Unruhe (61/100)- Possibly the only Canadian in existence and although your views may be a bit radical, you are considered one of the best people in the West these days.

George Washington (66/100)- Freed America from the British and built a fundamentally republican system dedicated to fighting colonialism, imperialism and genocide, unfortunately crappy presidents later made America IMPERIAL. Instead of the hegemonic power we now have, your vision of ideal America must be reinstated. Liberalism, Capitalism and Individualism, a little like Sakamoto Ryoma, is very shy despite being the most progressive force of your time. It was also up to you to free the slaves.

Benjamin Franklin (60/100)- Shame Capitalism, Liberalism, and Confederalism (even if classical liberalism was the most progressive force at the time), but at least you're a deeply rooted anti-imperialist and anti-slavery hero of the United States.

Thomas Jefferson (62/100)- Your ideas about freedom (based on national freedom, but you want individualist, liberal freedom which is daring) and your republicanism are so grounded, the abolition of the slave trade is really great. You are one of my favorite and best American presidents. Individualism is not nice and same for your liberalism and capitalism, but otherwise ok.

James Madison (63/100)- Based in Chad, who fought bravely against the British in the War of 1812 and granted greater rights to the Indian people. However, I still don't like your stance against slavery and some of your overly moderate policies, otherwise it's 100% grounded.

James Monroe (64/100)- Pledged to rid America of Colonialism and Imperialism and helped provide a better life for Natives. However, your relationship with Liberia is highly questionable and you have not abolished the slave system.

John Quincy Adams (60/100)- continued Monroe's legacy. You had good ideas but couldn't realize them, what a loss. Ulysses S. Grant (62/100)- continued Lincoln's legacy. But you're very corrupt, but that's more or less one of the few issues I've had with you other than invading Hispaniola (even if they're trying to do covert moves).

Martin Luther King (66/100)- Your Civil Rights movement will also be hailed as one of the greatest triumphs of the people in America, plus, even if I wished you were revolutionary, your ideology has a damn foundation. Supporting too moderate plus liberal democracy is not the way and you are a reformer.

Aldous Huxley (60/100)- He warned us about the future of Neoliberalism, which would turn into a Fordist society. If neoliberalism is not destroyed, humanity is doomed to fall. Antiauth is gay and you're too liberal for my taste. Pancho Villa (68/100)- The hero who made a great revolution against Porfirio Diaz. But just like Juarez, your ideology is pretty bad.

Benito Juarez (69/100)- He liberated Mexico from the French Imperialists and angered the European Imperialists, made Mexico secular and made major internal reforms there and improved indigenous rights. However, even if I admit that you are good, classical liberalism is a disgrace.

Subcomandante Marcos (64/100)- Not a fan of Libertarian Marxism, but based on the way you act and your goals to protect your own people. He's one of the few Libertarian Marxists I can respect because you're not a scumbag and most of his ideas are very grounded.

AMLO (61/100)- Your policies are based on little information I've read about you, but you've been falling further lately due to Mexico's slow response to COVID and Crime and being a bit too incompetent.

Jacobo Arbenz (66/100)- One of the greatest people Central America has ever produced. Wanting to fire the UFC, helping to distribute land to the villagers, wanting to develop the country, and wanting to do things like education, health, etc. your social reforms. These are amazing. My only criticism is that you are not radical enough and too moderate enough to build a strong state to prevent CIA intervention. One of the few successes that can be compensated. Another lesson soft socialists must learn is that people like Arbenz are too soft.

Manuel Zelaya (62/100)- Your ideals stand and you have liberated Honduras from the turmoil of pro-Western military dictators. However, if you're talking about change, show it. At least do something like Allende (or better yet, convert it to be communist).

Muhammad Ali Jinnah (56/100)- Similar to Gandhi, a great man who fought against British colonialism and tried to do what was best for Indian Muslims, but unfortunately his British Imperialist legacy has shattered India. However, you don't seem to be advocating socialism, do you? Nur Muhammad Taraki (57/100)- He had good intentions and continued many of the Progress policies of previous regimes. I've also heard that under your rule Afghanistan looks like a Socialist utopia. But you're a little too radical for my taste and too candid with Brezhnev

Cringe
1.İbrahim Kaypakkaya (5/100)- Terrorist and executive murders against villages. Typical MLM. Not to mention that the Turkish Maoist groups that use violence against ordinary civilians are inspired by you. Besides, who gives you the right to slander Atatürk when Lenin supports him and the Kurds love him? What gives you the right to betray your country? Also, the only salvageable part about you is Socialism, but even then, your "Socialism" will likely be the so-called "Socialists" supporting Joshua Wong in Hong Kong. I have zero respect for traitors like you. No one should support you. No one

2.Abimael Guzman (7/100)- I hate Fujimori and everything about that Neoliberal corrupt dickhead, but you're worse. You have terrorized the Peruvian people with ISIS-level brutality, slaughtering entire towns and bombing innocent civilians. Your ideology is already intimidating enough and your terrorism is making the situation worse. Scumbags like you deserve to endure the worst possible pain in deep hell.

3. Leon Trotsky (7/100)- If you seize power, you will become a Red Neocon. That doesn't make us any different from Western imperialists, does it? Also, you're basically causing more people to die than Stalin because of your Red Neocon ideals. The only good thing about you is to help the Russian revolution and the Civil War, but even then you will turn Russia into a genocidal imperialist state. You definitely deserved the Damn Pick.

4.Sali Berisha (7/100)- Europoid was corrupt as Hell, one-handed crime, had an ultra-capitalist economy that destroyed all Hodja's contributions and caused the Albanian Civil War. He did nothing but plunder the country of his successes during the Hodja era. Of course, Hodja has mistakes, but you are a billion times worse. Albanian Yeltsin. The only reason you're not at Yeltsin's level is because you're not an imperialist like him.

5.Ante Markovic (10/100)- The Gorbachev of Yugoslavia, but somehow even worse. You destroyed everything and all the hopes of saving Yugoslavia.

6.Zhan Videnov (11/100)- It ruined the Bulgarian economy, caused hyperinflation, did nothing against crime, so much so that the common man starved and sold the whole country to the borgeoized powers and the west. Yes, burn in hell forever. Bulgarian Yeltsin

7.Mikhail Gorbachev (12/100)- I will never forgive you until the day I die. The Soviet Union has become a source of pride for the Russian people, a superpower that bury the Western imperialists, brought immense favors to the Russian people from the tsars and the Nazis, you left Afghanistan to the Islamists and destroyed the image of Russia. I'm sorry by causing Yeltzin and you ruined Eastern Europe by letting them be sold to Western capitalists. Fuck you, let history condemn you to the deepest pits of hell. Also tear the bozo, burn bitterly in hell and slow it down and burn forever.

8.Levon Ter-Petrosyan (12/100)- Armenian Yeltsin. You did almost no good for your country, you destroyed your Neoliberal Capitalism, you caused a mass exodus of your own citizens and your country instantly collapsed its economy as a result of capitalist policies and the collapse of the USSR. Do you still think Capitalism is good?

9.Le Duan (18/100)- Good job crushing the Khmer Rouge regime in Cambodia and destroying the illegitimate government in Saigon, Le Duan, but that's the only thing better than you. Apart from that, you are a revisionist who is stupid to run the economy and even the conservative sects of the CPV didn't like you, also why are you a Sinophobic Brezhnev Puppet? You are more or less Vietnamese Brezhnev. You've made some good contributions (like reuniting the country and beating Pol Pot), that's it.

10. Nikita Khrushchev(19/100)- Were the emerging technology and space programs good? Yes. Was it good to improve the lives of the villagers? Yes. Was solving the Suez Crisis effectively good? Yes. Why is this man here, you say? Perhaps because it was responsible for crushing protests in Poland, for violating the national sovereignty of Eastern Europe, for treating Cuba

11.Todor Zhivkov (20/100)- industrial projects and things like that are very good and based on market socialism. At first you increased the education rate. You increased the production rate. The poor eastern european country; You have developed enough to establish your own nuclear power plant. You have eliminated the problem of livelihood. In the first period, you gave importance to Turkish mother tongue education. But then suddenly you became an Ethnic Bulgarian nationalist and approached it chauvinistically. You threw away all the gains.

12.Hu Yaobang

13.Zhao Ziyang

Jiang Zemin(28/100)

Among all modern Chinese politicians, you represent an entirely new subordinate. It led to the rise of reactionary billionaires like Jack Ma and Guo Wengui. Support the mass exploitation of international companies (eg Foxconn, Apple, McDonalds, etc.). He abolished the social state. Customized education and health. I persecuted my modern followers for wanting better living standards. The list goes on and on. The only good thing you did was expand the laojiao system and expand your persecution of Falun Gong and Eastern Lightning.

15.Brejnev

Alexander Dubcek (43/100)- Do you want to move away from the USSR and make Czechoslovakia more independent? based. Unfortunately Brezhnev had to take down a man like you. But you are too liberal for my taste and yet a revisionist. Still better than Brezhnev and Husak and the invasion of the Warsaw Pact was a Social-Imperialist crime because I believe Czechoslovakia should seek its own independent Socialist path. However, sympathy for antiauth and eurocom is also pretty bad, liberal corruption, capitalist mode of production etc. to revisionism and an irreversible path. I don't really like you, but I don't like you. So the occupation was a crime.

Milos Jakes (40/100)- Czechoslovakian Gorbachev, I doubt you're incompetent since Husak destroyed all hope of saving Socialism in Czechoslovakia, but still a dirty formalist.

BASED
Kemalism

Mustafa Kemal Atatürk is based.I wish all the clergy had been executed. Republicanism, Secularism, Populism, Statism, Reformism, Revolutionism... You have made many reforms in political, social, legal, educational and cultural, and economic fields. You have made my country modern and developed. You broke industrialization and development records in the world. You are great.He liberated Turkey from the Ottoman Empire, she is a person with great ideals in general to modernize Turkey and build the modern Turkish state.

Marxist-Leninist Kemalism / Far-left Kemalism

mlk would be a great ideology.



Based on staff The synthesis of Kemalism and socialism is wonderful. I like leftist kemalists.

National Democratic Revolution

National democratic revolution. At least you are defending Atatürk more. Moreover, you are doing this to a national left. Combining socialism and nationalists; you are defending the Eurasian Union by removing it from NATO. It is based. But almost no one likes you.

Social Democratic Kemalism / Centre-Left Kemalism

People based on İsmet İnönü, Erdal İnönü and Bülent Ecevit. At least you're pissing off the right-wingers. But your followers are too pro-Western.

Olof Palme Thought

The only Swedish politician in existence. Under your direction, you supported the centeredness of the Castro and Ho Chi Minh anti-imperialist fighters. You also adopt a policy to support the giga-based third world. You have to rule sweden forever so sweden became nato hole like now

Jacobinism

If Robespierre had not taken drastic measures. The Republic would fall. France was to be occupied by the invading royalists. He saved the revolution and the country with drastic measures. Robespiere Marat and Saint is a hero.

Leninism

Lenin is the great revolutionary. We must follow the illuminated path of Lenin. Great job overthrowing the tsarist regime, removing Russia from an imperialist power that massacres the people and starves the peasants, and brings the necessary social changes to Russia that empowers the poor, peasants and women. Economic Policy and almost everything you do for Russia is positive. Also, thank you to Atatürk and us for your help.

Stalinism

Stalin implemented socialism in the most correct and harshest way. Stop saying this is not real socialism. Liblefts He took a nation with hand plows and turned it into a nation in space with atomic bombs and satellites. He broke new records in the economy. stalin gigachad.

Juche

Kim il sung is the best leader. It's great we have a nuclear bomb. And you are defending Stalin.You won the war and killed that US puppet Syngman Rhee. It is based on the Juche concept. You have taken a strong hand to perfectly build North Korea in its material conditions and you truly understand how to run a country. You are fundamentally human. You're pretty based.

Ba'athism

Besar Assad is the lion of the Middle East.God, Syria, Bashar! The Lion of the Middle East is fighting Western Islamists, Terrorists, Wahhabis, Zionists and Neo-Ottomans. Despite seeing its economy at war, it is still standing.

Honeckerism

The best is East Germany. I love your ideology. Based man.Probably the best man Germany could produce. It improved living standards, rejected western neoliberalism to reunite Germany, and had many good policies of industrialization and the like. However, it is bad to support Brezhnev completely, otherwise you are the hope of creating a solid beacon of Socialism in the West and YOU must be the model for the West to follow. Overall a great, chad based chad.

Ho Chi Minh Thought

Vietnam's real leader.Hero and inspiration of global anti-imperialism. He fought a bloody battle to save his people from the Japanese, French, Americans and National Traitors and revived the economy.

Sankarism

Africa's best revolutionary, comrade Sankara!He expelled the French imperialists, left the neoliberal westerners alone, built his country from scratch, vaccinated millions of children, lifted many people out of poverty, purged corrupt officials, improved health and education, and outlawed female genital mutilation, polygamy and child marriage. This man is the greatest person Africa has produced and one of the best people ever produced by humanity.

Nasserism

Nasser is Egypt's best leader. He has an ideology based on it. The head of the Non-Aligned Movement, which improves the living conditions of Egypt, scares the imperialists, advocates large-scale development and angers the imperialists. A great man who fought against the imperialists.

Castroism

Cuban revolutionary, friend of Atatürk. Allied with Assad and Kim Jong Un.A champion of anti-imperism and a figure in Latin America's struggle against America and its adherents to American imperialism.

Guevarism

Che Guevara is a great comrade. A unique revolutionary.An inspiration for the people of Latin America to fight the murderous dictatorships in Latin America supported by the American imperialists.

'''Indira Gandhi Thought

Indira Gandhi is the best leader of India. I like his ideology.My favorite Indian prime minister. He has nationalized industries and industrialized most of India as well as having a large economy. The basis is human.

Bourguibism

secular tunisian inspired by Kemalism. He has a very grounded ideology. Bourguiba is a great president.It gave women's rights, freed the country from France, modernized it and made it a modern nation, it had policies that cared for the common people. Atatürk-like personality.

Canabalism'

Being anti-alcoholic. Being against fundamentalist Catholicism. Being a Left Populist. Being a Leninist and a Marxist is based on being a State Socialism. Really interesting Mexican.

De Francism

Progressivism is at a very high level. Fighting the monarchism with fundamentalism. Reforms that move society forward are fundamental.

'Duterteism

He is the one who distanced the Philippines from the Americans, killed the terrorists and drug dealers, and developed the country's economy.

Getúlism

Gerilio is a Vargas-based person. From my point of view, his ideology looks great. The only problem is that he is autocracy. Other than that, he's a great Brazilian leader.You're popular with the Brazilian audience for a reason. Your reforms and have been very good for them and you are good, you have developed Brazil.

Tridemism

Father of modern China. Without him, the country would be backwards. They have great ideas.He is the father of modern China, who freed China from feudal shackles and freed the Chinese people from the oppression of Western powers. He has a fundamental view.

Lee Kuan-Yew Thought

One of the four Asian tigers to develop the economy of the small country.It is neither exploitative nor neoliberal from the classical US influence. Morality and Western Democracy critique are ideals-based

Marhaenism

Indonesian great leader. His thinking is grounded.Few people in history have been as successful as Sukarno. Inspired by Nationalism and Socialism. He is from a country of the world. He is one of the greatest people ever.

Pancasila (left)

Sukarno, one of the bravest statesmen and revolutionaries in history, and the father of a successful modern Indonesian. Your non-alignment unfortunately destroyed Suharto and overturned the tenth neock experiments.

'Lincolnism

My favorite American president. He reunified the country, freed himself from slavery in the South, and effectively robbed the imperialists after he was freed from the Confederates. Plus, if you lived longer, America might still be an established Anti-Imperialist stronghold. He is based people.



I love you for revolting against England and weakening them so as not to pay the debts; You accepted the republican government. expel the English royalists; Failing to pay the debts of the French royalists. Laying the foundations of French Republicanism. based

Longism

Huey Long are the greatest people to ever exist, not just in America, but in all of America. He is a person to be respected.

Husakism

You knocked Dubcek. That's good You have managed to improve your rule, order and political stability, living standards.

Jaruzelskism

Although you have declared martial law in Poland, I can somewhat understand why you are doing this. You wanted to protect Poland from both the West and a Brezhnev invasion as they did to Czechoslovakia. You are generally fine. You tried to preserve the independence of the country.

CPGB-ML Model

KKE Model

'Li Peng Thought

'Zyuganovism

You are my favorite Russian politician in modern Russia. Your views on the vigilantes and lgbtoid bullshit and your nationalism and desire to return Russia to its former glory under Socialism are based.

Cardenismo

You are fundamental. You are one of my favorite leaders in North America. Your policies have given chad, indigenous and women's rights, nationalized your industries from the Westoids and your reforms are giga based.

National Front/Mosaddeghism

He is a based leader who should never be hit. He has done very well and I consider him one of the best in the Middle East. Mosaadik did the right thing by nationalizing the petroleum.

Blanquism

Nkrumaism

Obotism

Xi Jinping Thought

Bolivarianism

Simon Bolivar is nothing wrong. You've done good things to improve your country.Your Gran Colombia project will come true and you are a heroic son of South America fighting against the filthy Spaniards.

Evismo

Based. Your reforms denounced neoliberalism and did a lot to increase the quality of life for the Bolivian people, reduced dependance on the IMF and world bank, improved the economy, and had policies that did great for Bolivia. Based. Neoliberals and seethe over your sheer basedness. Like Castro, you're another champion of Anti-Imperialism

Chavismo

You are a hero to the Venezuelan people. You liberated your country from the Imperialist Right-wing Puppet government and established Popular Socialism in Venezuela. You are the champion of Latin America's struggle against imperialism.

Scientific Outlook on Development (科學發展觀)

It is the booming 10 years of the Chinese economy. Ended corruption, Helped improve technology, Brought some sort of reform but not much, What a goddamn gigachad. This man did nothing wrong. He is a very grounded man.

Xi Jinping Thought on Socialism with Chinese Characteristics for a New Era (習近平新時代中國特色社會主義)

He is not what the anti-Chinese media portrays him. It continued Hu Jintao's technological, economic and social advances and eliminated One Belt One Road, Moderately Prosperous Society, and extreme poverty. is gigachad. I like your determined anti-Western stance.

MİXED
Hoxhaism

No matter what Enver Hoxha is. I admire his defense of Stalin. But the clergy did the right thing by hanging them all. Even if you did some very crazy things.It was right for me to criticize the "Peaceful Coexistence" thesis produced by the USSR rulers. You were right about that. Because with imperialism, there is no compromise-peace, but war. "Soviet Social Imperialism" was pure bullshit. You created a split between the socialist camp.Your criticism of Mao is wrong. Still, you helped Albania develop.

Titoism

You are the partisan that I respect and remember with longing. But you shouldn't have trusted imf loans.Your departure from the socialist camp has worked for the American and French imperialists. But you still supported the anti-imperialist national liberation.

Ceaușescuism

Nicolae Ceausescu, you meant well. But you were deceived by the CIA. You have made the Socialist Camp fall against each other at the game of the US imperialists. You took a cold attitude towards the USSR. You bought heavy industry machinery and equipment by making agreements with the US Imperialist State. So you put Romania in big debt. You brought not only socialism but also your own demise with the wrong policies.

Gaddafism

Socialist understanding is great. You are the most beloved Muslim Socialist. But you did us wrong in supporting our enemies.You are a positive figure in the history of Libya. They have great ideas and programs to overthrow the Libyan King and make Libya one of the best countries in Africa at that time, but I'm putting this here because you supported the oppurtinist Kurdish cause.

Maoism

Mao, you did something wrong. Supporting Pol Pot. You got into pointless Soviet-Chinese rivalry. But somehow you overthrew the feudal system in China.Your thesis was based on the basis that the USA and the USSR were imperialist countries, and that China was the leader of the oppressed nations. This separation benefited American imperialism.It was right for me to criticize the thesis of "Peaceful Coexistence" produced by the leaders of the USSR. You were right about this..You made China develop rapidly. You started the cultural revolution that led the youth to socialism. that was good.

'''Gierekisism

Based in modernized and industrialized Poland. Your economic policy is great. But why are you friendly with the west. Are you an anti-Stalinist?

Dengism

. Putinism

Yeltsin's economic liberalism plunged the country into chaos. At least in your period, you pioneered the revival of the economy. Anti-Globalization Anti-American Liberalism I support your opposition to neoliberalism, Ukraine and the West. Liberal Globalist Americanist slaps pro-Ukrainian people nicely. I generally disagree with most of the ideologies.

Sanderism

Few grounded people who reject imperialism and really care about domestic issues (and more importantly) won over by the evil neoliberal elite of the American state, but your social policies don't suit a country like America. I don't like your stance on China, North Korea, Cuba and Syria.

Corbynism

You are anti Zionist. Britain and NATO are against imperialism. You support Hugo Chavez. You hate Thatcher, you hate Boris. You want a republic, but being against Assad and supporting apoism draws you here. .

Pahlavism

Your ideology looks good. You would be better off if you had declared a republic instead of a king.

İttihadism



CRINGE
Khrushchevism

The anti-Stalinism was utterly wrong. You even finished the good things that Stalin did. He spread false information against Stalin. Said unfair things against Stalin He pulled American missiles and betrayed Fibel Castro. peaceful coexistence was contrary to anti-imperialism. Climate expertise didn't listen. He went and planted cotton and corn. He had inefficient policies. He played an important role in the disintegration of the Soviet Union.

Gorbachevism

You didn't give it enough attention when the country was in a serious economic crisis. You made some mistakes during the implementation of the reform package that he wanted to do politically. While you were aiming to increase the freedoms of the people, you also got in trouble with the members of the Politburo. You have lost his credibility in the eyes of the public. The solutions he found could not go beyond instant improvements. You have destroyed the lives of millions of people in an instant. If the elderly in Russia are collecting food and bottles from garbage, you are the chief responsible for it.

Trotskyism

You are so egotistical. You betrayed the Soviets and collaborated with the Nazis.

You had an illicit affair with the married wife of a painter in Mexico. You are a very immoral man. Stalin did the right thing by killing you.

Brezhnev Doctrine

You have created a period of recession in your country. Your intervention to preserve socialism has caused a crack in the socialist bloc. Your attitude towards Kim il sung and Erich Honecker was not nice.

Marxism–Leninism–Maoism

In the "People's War" nothing works. Guzman, Sison, and Shigenobu are excellent examples. MLM understands neither Marxism-Leninism nor Mao's People's War theory. These scumbags are terrorists painted red.

Neoconservatism

You have destroyed everything ahead with the excuse of bringing democracy. You brought countries back.

Thatcherism

Damn filth. Exploitative, Laissez Faire is insidious, supporting terrible people like Somoza, Pinochet, Suharto and Pol Pot, doing nothing but making the lives of the poor worse, even if they work hard. Your economy is one of the biggest abominations anyone has ever seen.

George W. Bushism

He ravaged Iraq, caused two global conflicts under his rule, and committed tons of war crimes, a typical murderous neocon. You're the type to hang. At this point you're still one of the worst guys alive.

Obamaism

The domestic policy is normal but still an evil neoliberal imperialist and you destroyed Libya. You overthrew Gaddafi.

Bidenism

Sure, Trump is a lousy president, but worse. Syria is hostile to Assad and has increased the support of terrorists in Hong Kong and Belarus. He supported the genocide in Palestine. It also led to the rise of SJW. Needless to say how it allowed Afghans to die.

Trumpism

Mismanaged COVID slashed Taxes and donated to wealthy bourgeois and did terrible things in climate change and the conspiracies you promote are just bullshit

Harrisism

she is a vigilant liberalism woman who spreads a murderous, genocidal, maniac imperialist with neoliberal imperialism. Along with Ocasio Cortez, the main woman behind the rise of Wokeism...

Kaypakayaism

I read something about you. What else can I say? Your analysis of the War of Independence and your view of Atatürk are full of nonsense. Even Mao knows Ataturk better than you. Because you are a Maoist, your followers idolize you without analyzing the truth. You are the head of the communists I hate the most

Islamic Fascism

Syrian National Army

I hope you will leave the country as soon as possible. I hope that Bashar Assad will destroy you completely.

Dashnakism

Turkish enemy. Genocide scumbags. You're not even a socialist. You are a total fascist. Your follower also reveals himself as a fascist. Atatürk kicked you. The Bolshevik Mikoyan did a great job putting you in the camps.

Venizelism

You have occupied Turkish lands. The genocidal filth is the enemy of the Turks. You were a complete British Imperialist puppet. But you still don't give up. You still want our land. The statues of the Greek Partisans you killed, we must erect just to spite you.

Metaxism

Culturally right-wing monarchist anti-Turk. Megala ideaist. Everything I hate is gathered in beer. I support Greek leftists just to spite you.

Grivasism

Golden Dawnism

Turkish, refugee, anti-Muslim, racist and homophobic. Socially conservative and reactionary. Ultra nationalist idiot. We dumped people like you into the sea.

'Evrenism



Turkish Idealism

What will the expropriation be like?
The state imposes strict competition rules before moving to the production line. The process begins with the separation of foreign centralized enterprises and domestic enterprises. While state enterprises do not pay to obtain their own resources; buys with money from privatization. He pays taxes and works through them. State competition is the sole price determinant. When the state enters the production line; Millions of jobs will be created. All production factories to be established will form business lines. All stages are well planned in advance. Labor is important. Citizens' rights are guaranteed by the state. Every employee has a definition. Except for the definition of O, no front-end work is given. In this case, citizens will not want to work in the private sector where they cannot get their rights. Scattered and competing private businesses; State companies are in unity and solidarity. The private sector, which has lost its human resources, will have two options. Either employees should be given the same rights as state enterprises or they should be expropriated in the transition period. Otherwise, when the transition to a socialist economy is achieved, state support will not be provided in the collapse of the private sector. However, in the transition phase, the private sector can certainly use its right of expropriation.

How does trade work under socialism?
When the private sector completely nationalizes it, the principle of Statism comes into play. The principle of statism, micro-enterprises, is the way of realizing the ideas of citizens that they produce with the power of the state. To briefly explain micro enterprises; He doesn't want to be alone. It is a way of generating ideas for citizens for whom the state, production or economic power is insufficient. For the citizen who has the idea of ​​production but does not have economic power, he becomes a micro-business owner in a socialist state. The state grants the right to operate nationally the means of production it owns. Businesses are state owned. All rights of enterprises in the foreign market are protected by the state. Micro-enterprises whose citizens convey their ideas; nationalized whole production line consists of state enterprises With whom will the competition and quality criteria be made? This is where the biggest gain comes into play. Today, the quality understanding of the private sector, whose markets compete with each other, is limited to the goods in the domestic market. In the production line of the state, it is now in competition with the entire foreign market. The competition is no longer between state enterprises and the private sector, that is, against capitalism in the foreign market, not in its own domestic market. While foreign investors do not participate in state enterprises, micro enterprises receive investment and expand abroad. Thus, a market research is conducted for each state and the economic strategies planned separately for each state are implemented. For example, the food market is profitable for State A. In this case, macro businesses, not micro, attack that market. But the state B food market is unprofitable. That's when micro-businesses attack the market. State resource extraction; The operation and production of the goods to be exported is carried out only within the national borders. Foreign and private sector are not included in the production line. Foreign partnerships in the production line are terminated and foreign countries are pushed to the position of customers only. Thus, there is no employment gap in foreign companies. to indicate, to notify; In order to reduce the unemployment rate of the country to zero, the domestic production line comes into play and the unemployed class is employed in the production of all imported goods. The goods produced are sent in limited quantities to other states that will provide strategic income. The state first intensifies the domestic production process in the production of goods bought from abroad. Thus, it evolves into a seller position. The nation buys all domestically produced goods cheaply. There is no tax for domestic products. Because it is no longer private companies that create the goods produced; directly nation. Continuously developing technology is followed.

Science institutes employ scientists who follow innovations abroad. The state is not a closed economy model.

Foreign markets are included without including them in national borders. So it excludes capitalism. He's a good player inside.

Thanks to the factories to be established by the state; Domestic goods produced in each country are provided to enter. In this sense, besides trade agreements, the most important issue is that uncertain sellers also contribute to the economy. Uncertain vendors; It allows the state to enter that country without making trade agreements. Outside states are in the capitalist economy, not individual sellers. Sees trade agreements as factors of influence. If a government sells you goods in a trade agreement; He gets something in return. If not, the deal will be annulled. You too will be convicted. But obscure sellers apparently trade individually within capitalism. In the understanding of socialism, all state treaties were canceled; It will make it easier for obscure sellers who trade individually to invest.

==What will happen to the private sector? The Place in the Socilaist Economy==

of a certain group; It is the unjust and unjust enrichment of the society compared to the rest of the income by taking advantage of the uncontrolled free market with business models that do not contribute to production, education, science, art, sports or global development.

E.g; insurance, lottery, or similar betting businesses, municipality, deputy, real estate sector and housing companies, some business lines in the private sector, statuses that do not require qualifications, certain areas in the media and entertainment sector, associations, foundations and communities, many elements in the private sector in case of uncontrolled enrichment. it does.

The real estate sector is a model that does not contribute to production.

The sector, which shows uncontrolled urbanization activities such as housing companies, will be connected to the Ministry of Urban Planning.

Construction companies will operate together with the staff assigned by the Ministry of City Planning during the construction, resource and material supply, quality, approval of the building's compliance with the city plan and construction phases.

Construction companies can only operate in accordance with these control conditions; otherwise, they will be expropriated. Bids are publicly viewable.

Although there are state enterprises in service sectors such as banks, education, health, transportation, distribution, agriculture; in all other service sectors; will be private enterprises. These will be under state control.

The manufacturing sector is under state control. Today's private sector; evolves into the public sector. No specific business models set prices. Only the state determines the price directly proportional to the cost of production, labor costs, and profit.

Gathering the media and entertainment industry in a certain class with astronomical figures; leads to poverty of the society. For this reason, the state goes to radical changes in the media and entertainment sector.

Socialist Planning
Determining the needs of the society and embodying these needs as economic and social goals,

Evaluation and determination of implementation tools to achieve these goals,

Transforming these into operational plans based on sectoral production targets, as in our example, and

From here, it is reflected in the plans of all production units.

includes all processes.

Current Technologies The power of socialist planning lies behind the fact that the Soviets have turned from a backward country into an industrialized, poverty-stricken and developed country that surpasses independent capitalist countries. Considering the informatics possibilities of that day, the socialist state, which was established on a geographically huge area, can be estimated to have experienced the greatest difficulty in data collection, transmission and processing processes in planning studies. Computers were used at many points in terms of data processing, but it will be mind-opening to compare today's computers with the computers of the period in terms of understanding the difficulties. The first computer developed could perform 50 operations per second, and today computers with a transaction volume of 50 billion times this are produced. To make it easier to imagine, we can think of it as follows; With today's computers, it is possible to calculate a transaction that took 1 month to calculate in 1 second. With today's system, technology and methods, it will be easier to collect, transmit and process the data required for the planning processes, to guarantee the accuracy of the data to be provided and to monitor the realization of the plans (monitoring cycle). We can summarize the technologies that will make this possible under the following seven headings.

1. Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) Systems
Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) systems are systems that enable the efficient use of resources such as labor, machinery and materials required for the production of goods or services in institutions. It is derived from the Material Requirements Planning systems that emerged in the 90s and the Production Resource Planning systems, which we can describe as the second generation of these systems. These systems consist of various database applications that work in integration with each other. In the mid-90s, it came to support all the basic functions of a manufacturing company. They are systems that support all production processes with sub-modules such as Finance/accounting, Budget management, Labor management, Production management, Order management, Pricing, Project management. With the widespread use of the internet in the 2000s, 2nd generation ERP systems have become web-based applications that provide real-time access to data for institutions that provide goods or services to the institution and the institutions or persons using them. In today's terms, topics such as supply chain management, customer relationship management and business intelligence have entered. Today, these systems, which also use mobile technologies, put issues such as integration and decision making at the center.

2. Artificial Intelligence, Data Science and Big Data
Although robots come to mind when it comes to artificial intelligence, artificial intelligence has many sub-fields other than robotics. Among these, it can be said that the most relevant sub-field of central planning is "artificial learning". Machine learning is that instead of programming the computer directly to perform a certain task, the computer learns to do the relevant task from the data provided to it. Automatic translation is a good example of this. Let the task be to translate the English sentence given as input into its Turkish equivalent. A computer program that uses dictionaries and grammar rules can be written to solve this problem, but this is a very difficult task and translation performance is poor. If we instead want to solve the same problem with the machine learning approach, we must first create a dataset containing a large number of English-Turkish sentence pairs. We then “train” the computer on this dataset. During this training, the computer learns a function that produces the expected Turkish equivalent for the given English input sentence. The parameters of this function are adjusted in such a way that the translation error on the available dataset is minimized. Then, with this learned function, even English sentences that are not included in the data set can be successfully translated into Turkish. Data science aims to extract the implicit knowledge and patterns in this data by analyzing the data with automatic methods. It is an interdisciplinary science that concerns mathematics, statistics and computer science, and often uses machine learning methods. Thanks to data science, historical analyzes can be made, as well as short and long-term predictions for the future. “Big data”, which we have heard frequently in recent years, is a general name that indicates the data that is automatically and continuously produced in many areas of life, including production-consumption processes, with the spread of sensor and computer technologies.

3. Simulation
Modeling and simulation basically covers creating models based on real data and creating simulation scenarios to examine the behavior and operation of these models under different inputs and influences. Especially in recent years, in addition to the increasing processing power and amount of data in computers, more complex models can be established and realistic simulations can be produced with developing artificial intelligence technologies. In the development of the simulation, it is important to establish reliable models, to make realistic assumptions, to verify the model with real data, and to improve it according to the need for the acceptability of the results. Simulations can be used in many areas such as mining, agriculture, industrial production, consumption, trade, finance, demography, education, tourism, health, culture. In the field of production, it is used in product design, production planning and operation, calculation and estimation of production inputs and outputs. A large number of random or planned scenarios are created and run with input assumptions. As a result of the simulation, best/worst case scenarios, range of possible outcomes and realization rates are revealed as well as targets. With the changes to be made on the simulations, the effect of each input on the results is observed and the targets can be revised.

4. Geographic Information Systems
The display of location-related natural or social information on geographical maps, which humanity has used for hundreds of years, has been moved to an advanced point with the development of computer technologies. Today, processing high-resolution earth images obtained by satellites and enriching them with instant data obtained from one or more systems has become a part of large informatics projects and our daily life. It is used in many areas such as forestry, agriculture, irrigation, transportation, communication, management of energy infrastructures, city planning, tourism, aviation, border and coast guard.

5. Internet of Things
“Internet of Things” (IoT) defines devices that can interact with each other or with people through wired or wireless communication methods. Each of these devices has its own unique identity information. The application area of ​​NI devices has expanded greatly. The number and variety of these devices will continue to increase in parallel with the increase in our data processing capacity. More than 30 billion IoT devices are currently in use and it is expected to exceed 75 billion within 5 years. Step counters, locators, health finding monitors (pulse, saturation, sugar, blood pressure, temperature), drug injectors, which are called wearable devices, can be given as examples of NI devices that have started to enter our personal area of ​​use.

6. Electronic Money
Electronic money3 is a monetary value that can be controlled by public institutions, whose legal regulations are determined by the state central authority, and can be used as a means of payment. Electronic money and physical money are not functionally different, and the unit need not be different from the physical (paper and metal) currency used in the country. Payments for goods and services can be made in cash (physical money) as well as electronic money. Tools such as credit cards and meal cards are methods of transfer, not electronic money itself. It was the spread of fast and secure communication between computer systems that made it possible to use this technology in the financial system. Today, electronic money provides opportunities such as making payments quickly and even without meeting face-to-face over the internet, with tools such as credit cards and meal cards. The fact that our regular payments of definite/uncertain amount can be made by order (due fees, water, gas, telephone, etc.), eliminating the need to carry wallets, and reducing the risk of loss/theft are among the factors that make it widespread. But most importantly, wage payments have started to be made with this method.

7.Mobile Technologies
They are technologies that use wireless communication, and in fact, it can be said that they entered our lives with the first radio signal at the end of the 1800s. In recent years, with the coming together of mobile communication with information technology, they have started to be widely used in production. Development of systems (supervisory control and data collection systems and production execution systems), quality, stock management, reporting (monitoring and instant reporting of every stage of production), real-time monitoring, reporting It is also used in production in topics such as better logistics, supplier coordination and forecasting with its facilities.

8. Opportunities of Current Technologies in Socialist Planning
Although the subject of the difficulties faced by socialist planning in real socialism experiences is beyond the scope of this article, the possibilities that current technologies can offer for socialist planning, "What difficulties would Soviet planning overcome?" It gives important clues about the answer to the question. Considering the elements of the G central planning hierarchy, it can be seen that today's production units can be the basic planning tools. The hierarchical systems that make up such a production unit and the technologies that can be used at every level are shown. The system hierarchy within the production unit plans or operational plans is not different from each other. It would not be wrong to say that ERPs can also be used as tools for resource planning at higher levels in the hierarchy. The data flow chart shows the relationship between planners, production units, distribution points and needs/wants, and the technologies that can be used in a sample socialist planning.

The output of a production unit can depend on many variables. Examples of these are whether a required raw material arrives on time or in sufficient quantity, machinery malfunctions, labor productivity, unexpected logistical problems, power outages, and even the weather. The problem of how and at what level all these variables affect the output of the production unit can be solved by statistical modeling. We know this is not a new technology or possibility. What is new is the developments in machine learning, which has formed the basis of data science in recent years. New machine learning methods can learn much more complex functions and provide higher accuracy than classical statistical modeling methods. These developments, combined with the acceleration of processors, the ease of production and storage of data, offer new possibilities that were not possible before. Significant patterns and implicit information can be extracted from large amounts of data, including variables that are at first glance unrelated to each other. Data science is used not only to understand the past, but also to predict what might happen in the future based on existing data. It has become possible to predict in advance how the output of the production unit will change or which machines will fail for a desired time window (This can be a very short window or a very long one).

Today, we know that mega-corporations make centralized internal planning of production, supply, distribution processes and effectively use data science methods to do this. For example, Walmart Inc., which has two million employees worldwide. A chain of retail stores makes a centralized planning within the company (Phillips & Rozworski, 2019) in order to keep the product variety and stocks in their stores at sufficient levels (Phillips & Rozworski, 2019) and makes use of data science (Malinowska, 2019). Products purchased from physical stores or online stores have increased their profits significantly by using all data based on the analysis of weather, social media and current news. While increasing profits may not seem like the right example for this article on socialist planning, the Walmart example illustrates the importance of data science in large-scale central planning.

As a part of central planning, simulation models can be established at scales such as production process, production unit, production area, production region, as well as possible situations and scenarios for nationwide production by establishing an interactive "simulations network". In addition, disaster situation simulations can be created and a comprehensive analysis of the measures that can be taken and their effects can be made. Monitoring and evaluation of especially natural resources, water and agricultural basins; Geographic information systems (GIS) are of great importance in the planning and operation of production units, supply chains, transportation processes. Thanks to the instant data to be collected in all these areas and the integration of artificial intelligence / artificial learning systems with GIS, the needs such as energy, water, food can be analyzed at different scales from micro level to macro level, depending on the population density in a certain geographical region. can be developed and improved accordingly. Devices that measure the quantity, quality, and malfunctions of the production on the production lines and determine the potential malfunction in advance are becoming widespread. At the same time, production facilities that remotely manage production lines and even operate completely unmanned with the contribution of robotic technology in some sectors are the technological level reached today. ICT technology will contribute to reducing production costs, making plans instantly instead of annual monthly periods, isolating people from heavy and dangerous works as much as possible, and reducing working hours.

It is possible to measure temperature, humidity, used heat, light, energy consumption of electrical devices, open and closed conditions of windows and doors in residences. These devices are used today in residences called smart homes and yet seen as luxury. Ensuring that these devices are used in all residences will both provide more livable housing for every citizen and greatly improve the total energy consumption of the society.

It is possible to monitor and manage every point of the infrastructure that everyone benefits, such as electricity, water, natural gas distribution networks, transportation and communication lines. In this way, it is possible to reduce the losses in natural resources to a great extent and to plan and build more livable cities. In addition, if every citizen in need of the society can benefit from wearable devices, early warning can be given in cases of critical illness, and the public health can be increased by determining the diet, movement and sleep patterns that the person should follow. Today, states and companies continue to use electronic money technology with increasing intensity due to the possibilities of instantaneously circulating, transferring and converting money into other currencies.

Technology accumulates statistical information on the use of money for states/companies and enables the production of tools that can manage the capitalist financial system with instant interventions. In a socialist state, too, the use of physical money can be used as part of planning by prioritizing other priorities, or even abolished entirely. Thus, the effect of people's consumption on production can be monitored centrally in production planning and value determination, and this data can be used for planning. It allows to set upper/lower quotas for certain subjects as part of the planning. Since it can be monitored as a data center, unexpected money accumulation at any point becomes visible immediately, second economies cannot be formed. At the same time, it can be ensured that secondary economic interfaces – including the family – do not form between the public and the individual (as part of the production unit).

It can be predicted that mobile technologies will be highly functional in collecting beneficiary notifications as well as their use in the field in production. Although it is the subject of different disciplines, we have the infrastructure to solve issues such as the management of basic needs, industrial production, raw material supply, logistics management, population policies, environmental factors in a completely integrated manner. As stated above, this information infrastructure is in a position to provide us with the ability to pre-examine the nationwide impact of instantaneous decisions and manage them when necessary. Today, these systems are systems that are used within the framework of free market conditions for each company's own benefit, namely profit maximization, and are still owned by capital. These tools will need to be redeveloped and parts integrated to pass ownership to society. Today's rapid software development and integration techniques will facilitate the informatics of socialism. In socialism, when knowledge is shared around a single main purpose; information processing units will be part of a system in which they are used in production for the benefit of society.

How can they transition smoothly to communism?
All the people of the village will come together and all their lands, houses, tools and equipment in the villages will be accepted as the common property of the villages.

Homeless villagers will unite and build a house. A big barn will be established in all villages. All animals will be gathered here and 3-5 people will manage. Fields and gardens will be cultivated together The products will be stored in a place to be established in the villages. A cafeteria will be established in the villages. All the villagers will come and eat here in order. (In this way, each house does not have a separate kitchen and kitchen expenses. Moreover, everyone does not waste time cooking separately for hours. Moreover, a great saving of electricity, water, gas, money, time, labor ... is provided..) Increasingly, with a monthly income that a person can hardly live on at the moment; maybe 10 people can make a living in that village.. excess products are sold and put into the village's coffers.

(Anyone who wants should be able to review the expenses..) Then, greenhouses will be established with the income obtained, modern irrigation systems will be established. Wind, water and sun will be used to produce electricity. Villagers will be insured against diseases and natural disasters.

What will the feminist  socialist society be like?
The socialization of the means of production together; Communal institutions such as free kindergartens, cafeterias and laundries will be established.

With the Civil Code, women will be given rights in areas such as work, education, marriage and abortion.

It will be ensured that all kinds of facilities that can be realized by the state for women to attain their economic independence will be realized: Kindergartens will be opened, housework and education will be made collective. Pregnant women will be facilitated by practices such as maternity leave and returning to work without any difficulties after giving birth.

Men and women have an equal position in the family, I will not put any pressure on women regarding the surname. Your abortion will be legalized.

violence against women, child marriage will be tackled

women's participation in the economy and politics will be ensured.

The labor force participation rate, which indicates the ratio of female to female population, is very low and women in working life are under serious threat of unemployment. First of all, the participation of women in the workforce should be ensured.

The unequal position of women in working life is also reflected in economic income inequality. Women's share of gross gross national income is lower than that of men in all countries. For this, inequality positions should be eliminated with the participation of the female population in the workforce and education, and it should be ensured that they are economically equal.

The "Women's Solidarity Organization", which was established under the Central Committee and consists of women, will be established in order to put the economic and social rights of women into practice in practice.

Women will be educated in schools opened through the "Women's Solidarity Organization", which consists mostly of women from peasant and worker origins.

working women will generally be given a few days of paid leave during their menstrual period.

For women who are breastfeeding, at least thirty minutes of paid breastfeeding breaks will be applied every three and a half hours.

Rights such as 8-hour working day, milk allowance, insurance, nursery, maternity leave will be given.

Government:

 * Representative democracy, but to vote you need at least college and to candidate for the president you need to have a degree in political science
 * Elections every five years
 * There is no jury in the court
 * Drug ban
 * You need a license to have a weapon
 * Cameras in public places

Economy:

 * Free healthcare
 * Free education
 * Public transport
 * Public banks
 * Socialist economy
 * UBI
 * a lot of restrictions
 * Progressive income tax, 60% on average

Social:

 * Equality
 * Supports the Planned parenting ,abortion ,eugenics.
 * Secular state, religion is still alowed.

Nation and world:

 * Closed borders
 * Militaristic
 * Co-operates with other states and nations

Technology:

 * Accelerationist
 * High science funding

8Values
Equality 82.1% / 17.9 % Markets (Socialist)

Nationalism 68.9% / 31.1% Globalism (Patriotism)

Liberty 34.4 % / 65.6% Authority (Statist)

Tradition %17.8 / %82.2 Progress ( Exreme Progressive)

Ideology: State Socialism

9Axes
Federalism 18% / 82% Unitarism (Extreme Unitary)

Democracy 30% / 70% Authority (Authoritarian)

Globalism 34% / 66% Isolationism (Moderate Isolationist)

Militarism 66% / 34% Pacifism (Moderate Militarism)

Assimilationist 70% / 30% Multiculturalist (Assimilationist)

Security 74% / 26% Liberty (Extreme Security)

Equality 86% / 14% Markets (Extreme Equality)

Secular 82% / 18% Religious (Extreme Secular)

Progress 86% / 14% Tradition (Extreme Progressive)

Ideology:

State Socialism

12Axes
Federalism 18.0% / 82.0% Unitarism (Centralized)

Democracy 34.0% / 66.0% Authority (Bicemeral)

Security 62.0% / 38.0% Liberty (Statist)

Internationalism 30.0% / 70.0% Nationalism (Anti-Interventionist)

Militarism %70.0% / 30.0% Pacifism (Military-Focused)

Assimilationism 66.0% / 34.0% Multiculturalist (Assimilationist)

Collectivize 86.0% / 14.0% Privatize (Socialist)

Planned 74.0% / 26.0% Laissez-Faire (Regulationism)

Protectionism 62.0% / 38.0% Globalism (Limited Trade)

Irreligious 86.0% / 14.0% Religious (Atheist)

Progress 62.0% / 38.0% Tradition ( Progressive)

Technology 74.0% / 26.0% Bio-conservative (Technological)

Ideology: Democratic Socialism

CulturalValues
Results Ethnic Axis : Preservationist

Monoethnic 58.4% Multiethnic 41.6%

Cultural Axis : Integration

MonoCultural 55.7% MultiCurtural44.3%

Preference Axis : Very Equal

Favorism 20.6% Equality 79.4%

Acceptance Axis : Neutral

Extinctionism 47.6% Coexistence 52.4%

Pluralism Axis : Interculturalist

Seperation 42.3% İntegration 57.7%

External Axis : Protectionist

Diplocmacy 34.0% Isolation 66.0%

Progression Axis : Progressive

Progression 65.5% Regression 34.5%

Technology Axis : Post-Humanist

Transhumanism 92.9% Primitivism7.1%

LGBT Axis : Neutral

PRO-LGBT50.5% ANTİ-LGBT 49.5%

Nation Axis : Patriotic

Nationalism 56.2% Analonalism 43.8%

Religion Axis : Laïcité

Religion 16.9% Secular 83.1%

Philosophy Axis : Social Influences

Essentialism 33.9% Constructivism 66.1%

Closest Match : Matches not available yet

Why am I against the Turkish Maoist Kaypakkaya?
Failed to comprehend classes

İbrahim Kaypakkaya, like other youth leaders, could not grasp the classes and groups in Turkey. The fact that he accepts shepherds as the agricultural proletariat in his lines in his Kürecik report is an example of this.

“Now let's consider the various classes one by one:

Agricultural proletariat: The agricultural proletariat was not formed for the reasons we explained above. Those who have no property to make a living in the village generally migrate (to Antep and Istanbul). The very few families that do not migrate graze the herds of 5-10 houses, that is, they are shepherds. We can count these as agricultural proletarians (with the exception of some middle peasants who graze their own sheep). The poorest in the region are shepherds who tend other people's flocks. Their annual income is around 4-5 thousand liras. In addition, you can only keep the shepherd's food bread, etc. and the families he shepherd provides in turn.

The shepherds in our region are often the most revolutionary elements. These are the most ardent defenders of the armed struggle. While feeding Sinan Cemgil and his friends, most of them were oppressed and persecuted by the commandos and beaten at the police stations. But the shepherds stood firm, not bent over. In addition, they were promised high amounts of money if they told the Sinan's whereabouts. They know the terrain very well. Explore many caves, hideouts etc that military maps don't. they know. The shepherds will make a great contribution to the peasant armed struggle. (İbrahim Kaypakkaya- Kürecik Regional Report – October 1971)”

During this period, İbrahim Kaypakkaya did not break his ties with TİİKP yet, but accepting a layer of antique origin such as shepherdship as a layer of the modern class resulted in an extremely dire end, with shepherds denouncing the guerrillas of TKP/ML. This attempt would go down in the history of the revolutionary movement as another example of the failure of any attempt that did not include the urban as well as the peasantry.

Turkey's description of its economic infrastructure was wrong

By describing Turkey as a semi-feudal, semi-colonial country, he was repeating another mistake of MDD theory.

“There are two reasons why the revolution develops from rural areas to cities in semi-feudal, semi-colonial countries like us (Turkey): First, the essence of the democratic revolution is the "territorial revolution", and secondly, the cities of the imperialism that dominate our country and the reactionaries (especially imperialism) who are its servants. and that they have taken the advanced regions completely under their control. The yoke of imperialism on our country, since we are semi-colonies, also necessitates the development of the revolution from there to the cities, by establishing bases in the backward countryside (in us, the democratic revolution is inextricably linked with the national revolution).

The weakness of feudalism in a semi-colonial, semi-feudal country reduces the tasks of the agrarian revolution or narrows its frontiers, that's all (Ibrahim Kaypakkaya - Let's get Chairman Mao's Red doctrine of political power right - January 1972).”

Turkey is a state that has determined its own destiny and even subjugated the destiny of another people. It has an independent assembly and the first step of the bourgeois revolution has taken place. In other words, the "national" revolution was completed in 1923.

Despite this clear situation made by all revolutionary leaders and the Communist Party of Turkey in those processes, the commercial and military agreements made by this independent assembly with imperialism were evaluated as "cooperation" and "the condition of being a colony", and it was concluded that Turkey was a semi-colonial state. . At this point, all the evaluations in Shnurov's brochures are taken as they are. What is missing in this assessment is whether Turkey's independent parliament and bourgeois organization could not move without receiving a "yes" from imperialism. Turkey's situation in the Kemalist rule process is a situation that can be explained by the "in-between" of the oppressed national bourgeoisie and a slow shift towards collaborationism, and as a result, the alliance of imperialism, rather than a "colonial". Trying to make a "national" revolution in Turkey again, saying that this situation has emerged since 1923, is a legacy that Kaypakkaya received from the MDD members, whom he criticized a lot. He continues to reinforce the same error of definition by falsifying comrades Lenin, Stalin and Dimitrov, in line with the assessments made by Maoist theory on China (İbrahim Kaypakkaya – “Classes Leading the 1st Kemalist Revolution”, All Articles).

While the revolutionary leaders insistently state that the revolution made by Mustafa Kemal is the "national bourgeois revolution", he claims that the revolution was made by the comprador bourgeoisie. However, even if the bourgeoisie that carried out the revolution becomes finance-capital, it has no other feature than being national. The fact that it is national does not prevent it from attempting reactionary actions due to its age. İbrahim Kaypakkaya reflects the efforts of the usurer-merchant capital, which had to enter the war as the reserve force of the Anatolian bourgeoisie during the liberation war and, in the words of Comrade Şefik Hüsnü, "to become a revolutionist", to reconcile with imperialism to a whole movement. The problem of not being able to analyze the classes correctly prevents him from putting forward the correct definition in this problem as well. Finally, it comes to the point where it rejects the War of Independence. TIIKP frequently makes this criticism in the criticism of the draft program. He also makes the mistake of describing the economic infrastructure in Turkey as "semi-feudal", despite the power of finance-capital in Turkey. Although antique capital cannot be eradicated in Turkey, it can survive by forming an alliance with finance-capital, that is, it is not the "basic" determinant of the economy.

The communist leader, Hikmet Kıvılcımlı, falsified many times and equated him with the bourgeois leaders.

He claimed that although Hikmet Kıvılcımlı persistently advocated a democratic revolution led by the working class, he was defending the "Kemalist revolution". In fact, this attitude was frequently put forward not only by İbrahim Kaypakkaya, but also by Doğu Perinçek, who was his theoretical pioneer.

“As TIP, D. Avcıoğlu, H. Kıvılcımlı, Şafak and TKP revisionists claim (in the past and today), the Kemalist government was not a revolutionary and progressive government. Thinking about making an alliance with the Kemalist power meant taking refuge in the counter-revolution. Because the Kemalist power itself represented the counter-revolution. What the revisionists call counter-revolution is the destruction of the republican order and the establishment of the Sultanate. However, such a thing no longer works for the young sections of the bourgeoisie, even for the old Turkish big bourgeoisie…“

Hikmet Kıvılcımlı has never advocated cooperation with finance-capital. The very simple fact that the petty bourgeoisie, which defines itself as Kemalist, was allied as a reserve force, after the article that the CHP determined to transform from the big bourgeois party to the petty-bourgeois party after 1967, has unfortunately been distorted by such a slander. The same view was defended by other groups due to Turkey's sociological situation, but TİİKP and TKP/ML organizations persistently interpreted this view as an alliance with finance-capital.

İbrahim Kaypakkaya not only scribbled, he went so far as to call Kıvılcımlı "antichrist" during the PDA period.

“There is another side to the Enlightenment: The members of the Editorial Board have opened all the doors and even the windows to the Dajjal, who is banging on the door of Aydınlık, and they have placed the Dajjal in the corner. The Antichrist is disturbed by Mao Zedong, and Mao Zedong is disturbed by the Antichrist! However, these gentlemen who made the slight (!) mistake of confusing bourgeois policy with the policy of the proletariat, between the bourgeois world view and the world view of the proletariat, could not say that Mao Tsetung and the Antichrist got along very well, and that there was no reason for them not to agree. They tried to make it sound like he loved Mao Zedong all along (since 1967) and was following in his footsteps! They praised the antichrist! They tried to read the "Socialist Congress" tale that the antichrist whispered in their ears, with the stamp of Mao Zedong! They would almost condemn those who did not fall into prostration in front of the Antichrist with the crime of treason to Mao Zedong (letter signed by Haydar Fırat on August 29, 1971).

With this article, he prevented the unity of the left of Turkey during the periods when Doğu Perinçek was not yet a leader and took part in the youth movement, and, together with Mihri Belli, became one of those who set a barrier to the proletariat party in Turkey.

In the book titled "A Brief Evaluation of the Socialist Movement Before 12 March" by Nurullah Ankut, you can find in this publication how he criticizes Hikmet Kıvılcımlı in an inconsistent and baseless way.

Why am I against Hoxhaisme and Maoist theses?
Enver Hoxha was ideologically too attached to Stalin. He was one of his biggest supporters. That's why he took a hostile attitude towards Khrushchev, who initiated the destalinization. This understanding was common in Albania and China. Enver Hoxha and Mao, ”Stalin goes, everything ends.” They defended an idea that we can summarize as: They criticized the "Peaceful Coexistence" thesis produced by the USSR administrators, and they were right in this regard. Because with imperialism, there can be no compromise-peace, but war. However, later on, Enver Hoxha put forward ”Soviet Social Imperialism” and Mao ”The Three Worlds Theory” in conjunction with it. These theses were utter nonsense. Enver Hoxha's thesis claimed that the Soviets were an imperialist-colonial country. However, as we explained at the beginning, imperialism means monopoly capitalism. For this, it must be a bourgeois class. It is not possible to have capitalism with a change of administration in the Soviet Union. Economically, socialism was dominant and it is not easy to destroy a fully organized economy. Neither Khrushchev nor anyone else can do this out of the blue. Mao's thesis was based on the basis that the USA and the USSR were imperialist countries and China was the leader of the oppressed nations. We can also direct the previous criticisms to Mao. This separation between the Socialist Camp benefited the US Imperialists. Also, the US spy agency, the CIA, has used the "Soviet is imperialist" nonsense many times to slander socialism, causing it to be used even today.

Why doesn't KDHC crash?
Why doesn't KDHC crash? Some people say that as the USSR and other socialist countries in Europe collapsed, DPRK will follow the same path. The USSR did not simply collapse, the Soviet Communist Party and the USSR were destroyed by the deliberate actions of the traitorous Gorbachev. Decrees abolishing the state of the USSR and the CPSU were signed. There was no real collapse of the USSR, but there was a deliberate and deliberate betrayal of socialism by treacherous revisionist leaders who were hand in hand with the imperialists (Margaret Thatcher once called Mikhail Gorbachev a "leader with whom we can do business").

However, DPRK crushed the internal traitors who wanted to sell their country's interests to the imperialists, great powers and revisionists. In 1953, 1956 and 1967 the factional cliques were defeated and liquidated. In 2013, it liquidated the modern sectarian clique.

People's Korea, the land of Juche and Songun, is neither the former USSR nor the former East Germany, Poland or Hungary. Juche socialism is socialism that is perfectly implemented in Korea, which puts the masses of the people at the center. DPRK's socialism is neither an external imposition nor a gift from someone else. Juche socialism is completely different from the socialism that the former Soviet revisionists put into theory. Although the USSR raised the flag of the proletarian revolution during the era of Lenin and Stalin, it became a victim of modern revisionism in the era of Khrushchev and cooperated with the US imperialism. Abandoning revolutionary principles in the 1950s and 1960s, the USSR liquidated the dictatorship of the proletariat and declared itself the state of the whole people, giving up the class struggle against the enemies of socialism. North Korea, led by President Kim Il Sung, preserved revolutionary principles and opposed modern revisionism. In his 1967 article titled "On the Transition Period from Capitalism to Socialism and the Question of the Dictatorship of the Proletariat", President Kim Il Sung fully emphasized the necessity of the dictatorship of the proletariat and opposed the counter-revolutionary idea of ​​the "state of the whole people".

Since the economic system in DPRK is based on socialist ownership of the means of production, there is no social inequality. There are no social contradictions and racial discrimination. There is no unemployment in North Korea, there is no deduction in salaries, and indirect - direct taxation was abolished in 1974. There is no stagnation in DPRK as in the USSR in the late 1970s and 1980s. In the 1950s, the economic growth rate of NKR had reached 40% in one year.

The secret of why NRW will never collapse is the Juche Idea, the Songun Idea and the three pillars of the idea of ​​self-development first. In 1977, respected British social scientist Dr. Malcolm Caldwell wrote: "It is clear that South Korea, deprived of huge loans, US military support, and integration into the international capitalist economy, will collapse, whereas the North Korea that remains attached to the Juche can remain independent forever" (Malcolm Caldwell "The Wealth of Some Nations" Zed Press 1977).

Dprk Truth
We will make a general assessment about DPRK in the light of the information I have scanned completely from researches. If we look at the education data, the literacy rate is 100%. [2] Although this may seem like a simple data, there are still countries around the world that cannot reach it. The number of students per teacher is 20. The average in the world is around 24. [3] The primary school completion rate of students is around 97%. [4] Life expectancy is around 72 years. Child or infant mortality rate under the age of 5 is 19 per thousand according to 2017 data. The world average is around 39.1 per thousand according to 2017 data. [5] The infant mortality rate is 14 per thousand. The world average is 29 per thousand. [6] The number of patient beds per thousand people is 13.2, and the world average is around 2. [7] The death rate due to poor water and sanitation is 1.4 per 100 thousand, and the world average is 11.8. [8] The use of advanced water resources is 98.9%. [9] The vaccination rate for DPT, measles, HeB3 is 97%, 99% and 97%, respectively. [10] The rate of women receiving prenatal care is 100%. The world average is 86%. [11th] Unemployment rate is around 3.3%.[12] Women constitute 47.6% of the total workforce. [13] In transportation, it is a developed country in terms of railway. It is foreseen that there is a railway line of over 6000 km in total. Pyonyang subway has the title of the deepest subway in the world and an average of 500 thousand people are transported daily. [14] In addition, it is one of the countries with the lowest murder rate of 4 per 100 thousand. [15]

DPRK Struggle with Revisionism
While both DPRK and PRC strongly opposed the shift to revisionism in the USSR, DPRK opposed modern-revisionism from a completely independent, Juche-based perspective. It is true that the positions of the PRC and Korea overlapped for a while. However, the Democratic People's Republic of Korea opposed the division in the international communist movement and avoided drifting towards extreme leftism in the PRC. Based on the unity of one heart, Korea did not allow itself to be drawn into the ultra-leftist 'Cultural Revolution' that consumed China from the inside in the 1960s. In addition, Comrade Kim Il Sung, President, condemned China's left opportunism with the following words:

“The left opportunists failed to take into account the changing conditions and dogmatically repeated the propositions of Marxism-Leninism a hundred years ago and called it anti-revisionism; they led people to extremist actions under super revolutionary slogans. They sever the party from the masses, divide the revolutionary forces and prevent an intense attack against the archenemy. Allowed left opportunism to grow, it can become as dangerous as modern revisionism. Without fighting left opportunism, it is not possible to unite the anti-imperialist forces to wage a successful struggle against imperialism, nor is it possible to successfully combat modern revisionism.

Later, the PRC moved to the right in the 1970s and 1980s, declaring "reform" and "opening up". This was a rather incomprehensible and bizarre situation and has cost China many friends and supporters around the world, but the purpose of this article is not to discuss why "reform" and "opening up" took place or their effects. Comrade Kim Il Sung, President, emphasized that NKR should "always live in its own way, without any illusions about the revisionist and reformist policies pursued in some countries".

The great leader President KIM IL SUNG's successor Comrade Kim Jong Il in response to those who think that the Democratic People's Republic of Korea will adopt Chinese-style "reform" and "opening up", said, “DO NOT EXPECT CHANGE FROM ME!” said. He continued: “We must build a great, prosperous and strong country under the banner of self-confidence (...) The "restructuring" and "opening up" advertised by the imperialists should never fascinate us. "Reconstruction" and "opening up" is the road to national destruction. We should not tolerate them in the slightest.”

my book recommendations.
If you want to learn about the Soviet Union and Stalin and learn the facts, I recommend Grove Furr's books. If you find it, download it as a pdf from the internet. Type and read "Lies told about Grove Furr Stalin" into search engines. }}

Which Figure you think that I'm most similar to?
Format: (User) - (Figure Name)

Mega Based Super Mega Based.Kim il Sung my best of favorite comunist.
 * [[File:Syntridem3.png]] Apple - [[File:Zyu.png]] Gennady Zyuganov + [[File:SocKemal.png]] Doğu Perinçek
 * — [[File:KimIlSung.png]] Kim Il-Sung

Best/Worst Parts Of My Ideology?
Format: (User) - (Figure Name) Worst: Communism
 * [[File:Syntridem3.png]] Apple - Best: [[File:Kemal.png]] Kemalism and Turkish nationalism;