UserWiki:NotLibra

Hello! I'm a history buff and a Marxist-Leninist. My ideology is Marxism-Leninism, more specifically Guevarism. Basically, I'm AuthLeft, economically far left, and culturally left (for the most part).

=Beliefs=

Economic Views
I believe capitalism to an exploitative force that solely enriches the wealthy of society. It stripes them of their freedom and humanity, while putting them in a what is basically de facto slavery. It might be a different business you work at, but they're all the same in motive. This is why I advocate for socialism.

I think a majority planned economy is the best economic system to use. Using computers and other types of technology, we'd be able to plan much quicker and more efficiently, especially if we used Artificial Intelligence to plan. I'd add in co-oporatives to the mix as well, which would involve workplace self-management and democracy of course.

Government
My government would be similar to that of Cuba. The vanguard (which I'm going to be getting into in a bit) would act as merely a tool to educate the population and build up socialism. Other than that, the government would be council based.

My system would work like this: The people would elect communal councils, who would elect city councils, who would elect regional/provincial councils, who would elect state councils, and then finally, elect the national legislature. The legislature would practice what is called  Democratic Centralism. In simple terms, discussion and criticism would be allowed while discussing something in the legislature, but after a decision was reached, everyone would have to agree with it. This would allow a middle ground between centralism (keeping of the party or legislature together) and democracy (allowing discussion all the time and disagreements.

10 Goals of Revolutionary Democracy

1) To overthrow the current neoliberal oligarchy, and establish a workers-peasants-soldiers government.

2) To nationalize the oil and healthcare industries.

3) To establish a revolutionary democracy with power to the workers' councils, equal rights for all, no matter race, gender, or sexual orientation.

4) To abolish the position of landlord, and create communal lands.

5) To implement a six-hour workday, or a thirty-hour workweek. This would come with 35 days of annual leave at a minimum.

6) To make college free and erase all student loan debt.

7) To guarantee equal rights for African-Americans, Natives, LGBT+, etc.

8) To replace the current prison system with a tamer and rehabilitation-focused system. This would mean the abolishing of the death penalty, and much more.

9) To encourage freedom of expression and speech for all citizens, so that a culture of transparency can form in politics.

10) To bring every person into government via a semi-direct democracy.

Revolutionary Democracy
As I've said before, my form of democracy would be based upon local councils, similar to the USSR and Cuba today. My society would affectively a no-party state, with decisions instead being based upon the people and local representatives from workers' councils. Everyone would be in a workers' councils; For example, retail workers would form their own council, industrial workers would form their own council, and even soldiers would have their own council. They would all send representatives up all the way to the Supreme Council, and from there make laws and decisions based upon the people. If a representative is unpopular, they can be recalled at anytime.

In Revolutionary Democracy, freedom of speech and press would be protected, and even promoted to promote transparency within the political sphere. However, we'd also have to operate things like internal security to defend our revolution.

Purpose of the Vanguard
The vanguard party would be made up of professional revolutionaries and intellectuals. Why should we have such an organization to exist? Simple: The material conditions of the West currently make it so that spontaneous action isn't likely. We currently live in a post-industrial society, where not many know about Marxism besides how bad it is. The task of the vanguard would be to carry out the revolution, which would be achieved by educating workers on Marxist theory, and drumming up support for such a system. After the revolution, the party would be tasked with educating the working class, and setting up socialism. Collective leadership would be practiced in the party, and like the legislature, democratic centralism would be practiced.

Hypothetical Political Front Following My Beliefs
Popular Alliance for Revolutionary Democracy (there would probably be no United Front unless needed)

Communist Party of America - Revolutionary Democracy


 * [[File:ML.png]] Marxism-Leninism
 * [[File:Guevara.png]] Guevarism
 * [[File:Lpop.png]] Left-Wing Populism
 * [[File:Hochi.png]] Ho Chi Minh Thought
 * [[File:Ecosoc.png]] Eco-Socialism
 * [[File:Globnat.png]] Alter-Globalization
 * [[File:Castro.png]] Castroism

Agrarian Revolutionary League


 * [[File:Agsoc.png]] Agrarian Socialism
 * [[File:Consocf.png]] Conservative Socialism
 * [[File:Socgeo.png]] Social Georgism
 * [[File:Bernst.png]] Reformist Marxism

Neo-Panther Party


 * [[File:Blacknat.png]] Black Nationalism
 * [[File:Marxfem.png]] Marxist Feminism
 * [[File:Mao.png]] Mao Zedong Thought
 * [[File:Sankara.png]] Sankarism

Democratic Socialist Party


 * [[File:Bernst.png]] Reformist Marxism
 * [[File:Globnat.png]] Alter-Globalization
 * [[File:Soc21.png]] Socialism of the 21st Century

Social Issues
For the most part, I'm very progressive culturally. I'm for things like gay marriage, legalization of most drugs, abortion rights, transgender rights, etc. However, I'm for preserving some traditions that aren't reactionary.

I'm a huge Secularist, but not a  State Atheist. Religion is a powerful tool that can tear a government apart, and banning all religions will just help capitalists come and start a rebellion under the pretext of religion. That's why secularism is the best option for a socialist government, and not State Atheism.

For the most part, I'm fine with gun rights. It's mostly because before the revolution, having guns is you know.. good for revolution, and because after the revolution, people will be trying to attack us left and right, so we should train people to actually handle weapons, as these trained workers could form militias to help us fight any invader. Also, the conditions that cause things like shootings (poverty, mental health issues around the country, etc) wouldn't exist, or be as bad under socialism.

Abortion in my eyes is a right of woman to do. The fetuses aren't developed yet, and alive so no, it's not murder. If a woman doesn't want to give birth to a child, they should have the option to abort it.

As bisexual myself, I'm for the rights of members of the LGBT+ community. They're all human beings just like like you and me, and should be treated as such. However, some stuff like neopronouns have gotten way out of hand, and into the stupidity realm of things (cough cough Dreamsexuality cough cough).

Foreign Policy
I'd pursue a policy of protectionism and non-involvement in the affairs of the world, besides financing rebellions, and trade. This is because we should focus on building socialism at home before exporting said revolution. If socialism is not built up and still in infancy when exporting it is ready, these revolutions will die. Preferably though, a revolution would start across the world at around the same time, to help ensure the survival of such rebellion.

My thoughts on foreign countries -

First of, the US and the West in general. These countries are built off the exploitation of others at home and abroad, and finance reactionaries to help them continue this exploitation. Therefore, we should take an active role against them, and their imperialistic policies. The USA has a history of thiefdom, genocide, and more disgusting acts. (Manifest Destiny inspired the Nazi idea of Lebensraum)

Secondly..China. China is well.. state capitalist. The government hasn't achieved socialism yet, and they say they're planning to try and achieve it by 2050. The government doesn't provide much for their citizens. For example, public healthcare insurance only provides 1/2 of medical costs, meaning you still have to pay the other half. This isn't as bad as say, the US, and there has been improvements on it, but this isn't very good still for a self-proclaimed Marxist-Leninist country, considering you still have to pay for part of it. (Oh yeah, they don't have universal healthcare). Another thing is that the Belt and Road Initiative is basically just another way for China to gain soft power and expand influence. I'll give China one thing: Their imperialism is 10x better than American imperialism, and I'd rather have a loan from China than the United States.

On Kosovo vs Serbia, Kosovo should have the right of self-determination, but they should of held a referendum for independence and tried to work out something with Serbia before doing so. Overall, my opinion's neutral.

On the Cuban Embargo, it shouldn't of been done in the first place, and it should of been removed a long time. It's effectively a genocide of the Cuban population designed to starve the population so that another neo-colonial regime can jump in and let the U.S exploit the third world even more.

Finally... Israel and Palestine I think it's pretty obvious what my take is on the situation considering my political beliefs, but for those who can't figure it out - Israel is committing settler colonialism against the Palestinians living in the West Bank and Gaza, to create an ethnostate with no room for minorities.

Reform or Revolution?
I think it's pretty obvious which I prefer, but for the smoll brains here; Revolution 95% of the time. Reforms are just concessions to the working class, and can be overturned at any time. Therefore, revolution is the best option. However, reform can be used to help pave the way FOR a revolution.

Ideological Relationships
Based


 * [[File:ML.png]] Marxism–Leninism - Literally me!
 * [[File:Luxem.png]] Luxemburgism - Rest in Power.
 * [[File: Castro.png]] Castroism - Good One Fidel, you show those Yankees who's boss!
 * [[File:Guevara.png]] Guevarism - A legend who shall not be forgotten.
 * [[File:Progress.png]] Progressivism - Progress is needed for a society to function.
 * [[File: Hochi.png]] Ho Chi Minh Thought - One of my inspirations. You did become a bit too much of a cappie lately though..
 * [[File:3princ.png]] Tridemism - Sun Yat-sen is probably one of the best leaders of the 20th century. If only he lived longer, then we wouldn't have Chiang Kai-shek the butcherer come to power.
 * [[File:Lpop.png]] Left-Wing Populism - The masses are the most powerful in a post-revolutionary society, and shall be treated as such.
 * [[File:Technocracy.png]] Technocracy - Technocrats are useful for central planning and running the country.
 * [[File:Tito.png]] Titoism - Civic Nationalism? Workers' Self-Management? What else can I say but based!
 * [[File:Orthlen.png]] Leninism - BASED!

Neutral


 * [[File:Stalin.png]] Stalinism - WOAH WOAH, cool it down with the authoritarianism and purges!
 * [[File:Ancom.png]] Anarcho-Communism - Anarchism will never work, as you need a state to protect from capitalist invaders.
 * [[File:LeftCom.png]] Left Communism - You make a few good points here and now again, but you're way too dogmatic and braindead a lot of the time.
 * [[File:Dengf.png]] Socialism with Chinese characteristics - The reforms were needed, but you ended up just creating a state capitalist regime that doesn't do very much to provide for the common citizen. And you're way too Han Supremist sometimes. You're still better than the west though.
 * [[File:Libmarx.png]] Libertarian Marxism - You need to accept that no limits can be put on the use of party and state.
 * [[File:Mao.png]] Mao Zedong Thought - People's War, among other things were based. But rushing socialism was a stupid decision, and caused even more suffering and death.
 * [[File:Kemal.png]] Kemalism - Based secularism and progressivism. But quit it with the assimilation of minorities.
 * [[File:Khrusch.png]] Khrushchevism - Was more benevolent than Stalin, but was a dirty bureaucrat who almost caused a famine because of his idiotic agricultural policies.
 * [[File:MLM.png]] Marxism-Leninism-Maoism - Gonzalo was absolutely cringe and basically Pol Pot but less insane. And you need to be less dogmatic, and understand that most countries are not fit for a people's war.

Cringe


 * [[File:Nazi.png]] National Socialism - Do I even have to explain why you're here?
 * [[File: Libertarian.png]] Libertarianism - Oxymoron who thinks the market will solve every issue.
 * [[File:Ancapf.png]] Anarcho-Capitalism - Same as above but worse.
 * [[File:Authcap.png]] Authoritarian Capitalism - *pukes*
 * [[File:Neoliberal-icon.png]] Neoliberalism - Literally the Status Quo!
 * [[File:Socdem.png]] Social Democracy - "muh happiest country"
 * [[File:Patcon.png]] Paternalistic Conservatism - Even worse than the last. (Seretse Khama was kinda based though)
 * [[File:Plcn2.png]] Paleoconservatism - Far right zealot.

User Relations
(this is based upon ideology, not personality)

Based

Neutral
 * [[File:LeninisBasedsmall.png]] Leninisbased556 - Incredibly based.
 * [[File:GenShrekf.png]] ComradeShrek - Based, although cool down the conservatism a bit.
 * - Technocracy is pretty based.
 * [[File:DragonRed.png]] DragonRed - Fellow fan of computerized planning.
 * [[File:NovoImmorx.png]] Immorxy - Based comrade from Algeria.
 * [[File:Verone(hat).png]] Verona - Pretty based, although cool down the conservatism and dogmatism.
 * [[File:SamKibGuy_icon_.png]] SamKibGuy - Very based, although why Trotskyism?
 * [[File:PATS.png]]Nekoqing - Mostly based, although cool down the homophobia.
 * [[File:Anglo-Germanic Socialist.png]] Anglo-Germanic Socialist - Based!
 * [[File:SST-icon.png]] ShadowRaiden - Based, although could be a bit more revolutionary.
 * [[File:DN Adm.png]] DarknightYuusha - Mostly based, but why corporatism?
 * [[File:MLM.png]] Marsvner - Based ideologically, although MLM is pretty cringe.
 * [[File:Balodismconsmall.png]] IvarsBalodis - I can get behind Guild Socialism.


 * [[File:Yoda8soup.png]] Yoda8soup - Too liberal for my tastes, and Centrist Marxism, really?
 * [[File:Dengf.png]] 国际联盟球 - 💀 (Dengism is a bit cringe). The rest of their ideology seems based.
 * [[File:Syntridem3.png]] Applethesky2021 - Fellow Sun Yat-sen enjoyer, but too liberal, and Chiang Kai-shek is incredibly cringe.
 * [[File:Ashley.png]] AshleyHere - Not the biggest fan of Libertarian Socialism, but could be worse. Vermin Supreme is pretty funny as well.
 * [[File:And3_.png]] And3 - Same as above.
 * [[File:Novochirotesla.png]] Chirotesla - Market Socialism is based, although social views a bit bringe.
 * [[File:Cflski.png]] Sykar Socialist - Social Democracy is cringe, and some cringe liberal stances. At least we both like Sun Yat-sen and Georgism.
 * [[File:BeryAbLib.png]] BeryAb - Right-Libertarianism is pretty cringe, but Georgism is probably the only based capitalist ideology, so that's why your not cringe.
 * [[File:PagTheo.png]] Pantheon - Weird af ideology, and a Vowshite, but you do seem to have some okay takes, and Progressive Conservatism is alright.

Cringe


 * [[File:Ioist.png]] Io - A state is needed to protect the gains of the people. OH NO THEY'RE A VOWSHITE OH NO
 * [[File:Councilguy2.png]] Councilguy - Anarchism is cringe, and thinks the Bolsheviks were fascists. Seems like a cool guy though.
 * [[File:KaiserKlaus.png]] KaiserKlausMouse - Absolute LARPer, who simps for the Confederacy, and is a German nationalist despite never having set foot in Germany, and not even being fluent in German. Syndicalism is based, though.
 * [[File:Neoliberal-icon.png]] ANewDude - An illiterate, unironic neoliberal 💀💀
 * [[File:MATTball.png]] Matteel - You seem like a cool dude, but Social Democracy? why, just why
 * [[File:YellingLiber.png]] YellingYowie - Unironic neolibertarian. 💀💀💀💀
 * [[File:Ukraiana.png]] Ukraiana - 💀
 * [[File:Yugotard.png]] YugoslavPartisan - This is the only one where I'm gonna rate a person by personality. Absolutely insufferable and acts like a kid who has just gotten into politics. Vandalizes pages that they deem as "fascistic". Hopefully they can return to this wiki and not be as insufferable, by learning from the past's mistakes.
 * [[File:Cball-France-Beret.png]] Cheebow8 - Sorry, but conservatism and theocracy is not my thing, so that's why you're here. (You seem to be a nice person though)

=Comments=


 * fuck yeeeeessssss finally another based comrade

- Eh, Adam Something has based views on transportation but that's about it.
 * [[File:NeoML.png]] - True, but a lot of his takes are just stuff that have already been said before. His takes got worse after he started simping for Ukraine's government and NATO.
 * - Anyways, I'm very interested to see where you are going with your ideology.

I agree with all of your social issues. But I disagree with drugs. You have to fight drugs.] DragonRed add me. you look based.

Nekoqing: Seems based, add me.

Could you add me please, I have a user page here https://polcompball.miraheze.org/wiki/UserWiki:Anglo-germanic_socialist
 * [[File:NeoML.png]] - Did it.

Thanks for calling me based comrade-anglo germanic socialist

DragonRed

I agree with all of your social issues. But I disagree with drugs. You have to fight drugs.
 * [[File:NeoML.png]] - Eh, I think the Portuguese strategy of legalizing most drugs is most effective. We should then getting those addicted help, while taxing the sale of these harmful substances to discourage use. The Drug Wars across the world haven't done much but cause even more drug use, as we can see across the United States and Latin America.

- Vaush is based and redpilled.
 * - Very true

DragonRed

Vaush is a libtard. Neo conservative, pro-imperialist. They have very nasty opinions. An opportunist liberal.
 * - Ok, and?

- Can you add me? also i find it funny how so many MLs here put Kaiser in Bringe, like its very telling that you put a literal proto-fascist on the kinda good kinda bad category and put literal conservatives and reactionaries on the based category just because they believe in ML economics
 * [[File:NeoML.png]] - I didn't know much about him besides he was a Monarcho-Syndicalist of some sorts, but I'm gonna change it now knowing he's a fascist. Thanks for informing me.

DragonRed How would you describe the Portuguese strategy?


 * [[File:NeoML.png]] - Most drugs would be decriminalized, and those with addiction to drugs would be rehabilitated instead of punished for it.
 * - This shows that you haven't even read the Wikipedia about the Portuguese model. The Portuguese model was DECRIMINIZATION, not legalization.
 * [[File:NeoML.png]] - Wrong choice of words, should of said decriminalized and not legalized. Thanks for catching it and letting me know.

I added you, pls add me back -

- Wanna add me?
 * [[File:NeoML.png]] - Alright.


 * I added you, could you add me please?

- I’ve added you add me back?

- Actually Alright ideologically, although needs some improvements, add me pls.
 * [[File:NeoML.png]] - Done.

- Add me pls.
 * [[File:NeoML.png]] - Done.
 * - Can you add your views on Kemalism?
 * - Kemalist nationalism isn’t racism. Many notable theorists of Kemalism like Ismet Inonu and Bülent Ecevit were Kurdish. It’s just cultural nationalist and assimilationist.

- I have added you to my page. Add me back please?

TheJester - Can you add me when you get a chance?