UserWiki:DarknightYuusha-11

If you don't know me ,I'm Quagsus from the Polcompball Fandom wiki(which is basically dead)

If you want to be my friend ,then please be friendly and don't be so much like an asshole and let your political ideology define your very personality ,just like my Tankie past and a certain *Dem*soc that literally thinks that North Korea is a democracy.

I also like edgy jokes ,so expect me to say some pretty edgy shit ,like "All CANZCUCKS ARE BARBARIANS"

I'm also the guy that created the Parties and Movements of Code Geass Page

My MBTI is ISFP

= Political Journey = ---> /// ---> / ---> // ---> (/////////) =Beliefs(See also, )=

Overall
Admiralism is center-left to left-wing on the economic scale, and his economics overall are described as regulated market social distributist economics combined with georgist, and social-democratic policies, willing to protect the working class' well being as well as ensure equity and happiness amongst the populace whilst ensuring an economy strong enough to sustain those very things, the reason why he supports equity is because he believes it can be beneficial to society overall, as it emphasizes the need of cooperation, a key component to why human societies have been able to survive, and it's general promotion of happiness, in which he sees this as something humanity seeks, whilst the end goals of his might be idealistic to some he would adopt some pragmatist points as well in order to achieve this end, as whilst he understands that greed is an evil that must be shunned, it cannot be rid of due to it being an ideal sadly, as ideals are but abstract and are products of the mind and therefore cannot be removed, but what he can do is significantly limit it's influence, although he is against the idea of a large wealth gap between the rich and the poor, he also sees the total equality of outcome to be somewhat foolish and utopian, and prefers equality of opportunity, in which people are to be given the chance to be happy, because of this, he rejects the solutions of communism and instead prefers to be a regulated market socialist, though he is also willing to adopt regulated welfare capitalism and/or distributism as so to be more flexible in options in achieving the society he would envision.

[[File:ML.png]] Command Economy [[File:Keynes.png]] or Free market? [[File:Marketsoc.png]]
In a case like this, Admiralism is preferrably a mixed market economy that leans towards markets, He takes some elements of economic planning since he is supportive on the equal distribution of resources but doesn't support an economy primarily based off economic planning as it can be stagnant due to it being dependent over the government for spreading goods and can lead to it being overly bureaucratic at times, thus he adopts elements of a market economy to prevent such stagnation, as he believes that it can ensure efficiency through independent enterprises spreading goods through the promotion of the availability of multiple brands, however, there should be measures if a market economy would truly be efficient, thus, he would apply anti-trust, anti-usury, and consumer protection laws, as well as some supervision not only to ensure the survivability of the competitive spirit on the market, but to prevent exploitation as well.

[[File:Welf.png]] the welfare state
Admiralism Advocates for a strong, Universalist welfare state, Believing that what people need like water, food, shelter, and healthcare are deserving of easy access as he cares for the well being of the people, although he believes that most of the welfare should go to people struggling on a socioeconomic level such as lower class citizens with a Job and those in poverty.

Whilst he prefers welfare to private charity, he will allow private charities to exist provided they are not a scam.

Healthcare
Admiralism is an avid supporter of Universal and Free healthcare, for it greatly fits in with his beliefs in egalitarianism, however, citizens should still pay for medicine in order to cover restocking costs, and that those who must drink, smoke, or overeat should still pay for surgery, since they are the ones at fault for ending up in those conditions, He also believes that one must be a citizen/permanent resident should he receive free healthcare, He wishes to increase funding towards the healthcare industry

He also wishes to prevent people from abusing the system and that people are expected to take measures of responsibility, he does this through methods such as:
 * Fining people for a significant amount to those who miss out on two or more GP appointments
 * Charging people that are abusing drugs, Obese, Smoking, and being Alchoholics for the treatments that are responsible for their horrid conditions.

He also wishes to adequately fund and staff the healthcare system as well as make the primary care services of the healthcare system owned fully by the public(although some specialist services are allowed to be provided privately)

[[File:Synd.png]] Worker Rights
Admiralism Believes that Workers are Important for society and are very contributive to it, therefore, their well being is also important, With this, he supports the promotion of self-managed worker cooperatives with the elements of semi-direct workplace democracy sprinkled with some state intervention akin to Titoist Yugoslavia's self-governing socialism, he is also promotive of good working conditions, as he believes that toxic working conditions make workers less productive due to wage slavery and is the reason why horrid movements such as antiwork exist.

Unions
As he is supportive of Worker Rights, he also supports unionization as well, most especially in nationalized/heavily regulated enterprises, but are also allowed in smaller ones, he will also recommend them, although they are not a requirement, as Unionized workers can fight exploitation and gain strength that is not possible for individual workers, he also supports widespread ownership in major industries and essential services.

He is sympathetic the armament of workers, as Karl Marx put it: "Under no pretext should arms and ammunition be surrendered: any attempt to disarm the workers must be frustrated, by force if necessary." as an armed workforce can fight against the government(or weaken it) should it take a turn for the worse and defend their rights.

He wishes to add an amendment making it a constitutional right to join a union, although this will only apply to major industries and big businesses representative with unions present. Small and medium businesses may become representative or unionized if they wish to do so, but it won’t be required, although one will have full rights to join a union, believing that it is a worker exercising their right to work, and such unions aren’t present in countries like North Korea. Union-busting would become an unconstitutional act.

[[File:Socdem.png]] Enterprise [[File:Soccap.png]]
In this scenario, the amount of regulations an enterprise would have to face is depending on it's size, on larger ones, they will be subject to heavy regulations/nationalization in the cases where it is an essential service and therefore owned by both the state and by unions, whilst small to medium ones would be subject to only a little or a modest amount of them and are allowed to be privatized, however, there would be some small scale supervision and that unions would be granted the allowance to be formed as well as workplace democracy being implemented, although they wouldn't be really required for those small to medium businesses.

on to the topic of farms, he is an advocate for land reform and wants to have farmlands publicly owned to redistribute food for the poor, but will allow some private farms so one can grow his/her own crops and store his/her own food to prepare for a national food shortage just in case, in that matter, he fuses both communalism and individualism, as he believes that not only should food not be hoarded by a select few and allow the people to unite for cooperation on labour and civil matters, but allow individual liberty and prevent one from losing self-reliance in the event that misfortune falls upon them.

[[File:Geokitty.png]] Housing
Admiralism is sympathetic to Georgism in this regard, believing that the house should belong to it's occupier, and advocates for a land value tax instead of a property tax, in this regard, he heavily opposes propertarianism and landlordism, as he sees landlords as but lazy land hoarding exploiters who contribute rather little to society

he is also thinks that homelessness is a major problem, so he combats this through the construction of government built houses that are to be suited to provide the basic needs for a citizen, although despite the rather anti-landlord and anti-homelessness sentiment, he also believes that if a person refuses to work, that person wouldn't get those very benefits.

Trade
Admiralism is balanced towards free trade and protectionism, he supports trade between nations but also supports some sort of protectionism in the form of some tariffs, the reason why is because whilst he sees trade between nations as beneficial due to allowing economic growth, he only sees it as beneficial if it's mutual and not one sided, and he doesn't like the idea of unrestricted free trade as it can allow foreign dominance that can discourage local production and thus allow foreign powers to take advantage by threading on the sovereignty of a nation economically therefore subjugating it by making it in debt on those very powers which offsets the benefits of said economic growth (Looking at you, Neoliberalism *Cough* and Dengism to an extent *Cough*), he doesn't like the ideas of extreme protectionism and total self-reliance either, as it can prevent economic growth as seen in North Korea.

Wealth
As it was said before, Admiralism wishes for economic equity and thus wishes to lower the wealth gap and get rid of both the extremes of the rich and poor scale as with a small middle class, this can lead to a massive disparity of power, he is alright with some being richer than others provided the wealth they gained is through ethical methods and hard work, he is tolerant towards millionaires but not billionaires, as the wealth of billionaires are gained through shady methods, thus, the wealth earned by those who done shady methods shall be redistributed and be given to healthcare, welfare, environmental programs, infrastructure, housing, and so on.

A program similar to the share the wealth programs of Huey Long combined with some elements of Duterte's Ten-point agenda would be implemented, he would implement a wealth tax on the wealthy and thus redistribute the wealth gained by those exploitative to help the poor through the improvement and funding of welfare, education, healthcare, housing, infrastructure, and rural development programs, as well as use some of that wealth for technological and scientific development.

Taxation
As he believes that extreme inequality can put a strain to society, he wishes to prevent this through the implementation of high level taxation, the following taxes and their usages are examples on how he would prevent such problems: those taxes would be used to reduce economic inequality, fund the social safety net, and for the reduction of debt to a tolerable and acceptable level.
 * Progressive income tax: prevent the negative effects of wealth accumulation
 * Land Value tax: put a halt on land hoarding
 * Carbon tax: incentivize companies to be less carbon-oriented and reduce pollution
 * Minimum Corporate tax rate: prevention of capital flight
 * Value tax: raises revenue and raises the difficulty of tax evasion
 * Digital service tax: greatly strengthen the difficulty of tax evasion done by Multinational corporations.

As for sales tax, for goods such as groceries, it shall be removed, but will be kept for everything else, a graph shall be shown on how Admiralism would apply the sales tax: He is sympathetic towards the implementation of a 15-dollar minimum wage as for people to make a living wage, but it may potentially force companies to fire employees to prevent bankruptancy which can lead to unemployment, so just in case for the time being the minimum wage would be around 12-13 dollars, 11-12 dollars on small companies.
 * Water, Household and Hygenic supplies, medicine, Nutritious food - no sales tax
 * School and Work supplies - 3% sales tax
 * Unhealthy food and drinks - 7% sales tax
 * Furniture - 15% sales tax
 * Plastic materials that aren't at least 50% biodegradable/reusable - 30% sales tax
 * Non-medical Marijuana - 95% sales tax
 * Alcohol, chewable tobacco, cigar - 165% sales tax
 * Cigarettes - 225% sales tax

Usury
Admiralism wishes to strengthen protection against exorbitant banking charges as well as usurious interest rates and start a tough crackdown on Usury and punish individuals, companies, and most especially corporations that dare do such acts, he will also force those who do such like major companies to pay their fair share of taxes.

the punishment of such crime will range from a prison sentence to the death penalty depending on how severe the crime, the latter of which will be reserved on those who commit human trafficking and anything related to such.

Overall
Admiralism considers himself at the middle of the road in terms of authority, He promotes a competent and able government, not only for order, but also to protect and respect civil liberties as well, he's neither a fan of totalitarianism nor an advocate of anarchism, as he views the former as not only narcissistic and immoral but also overly bureaucratic and inefficient, and the latter being incredibly chaotic and idealistic.

Unitary or Federal
In the question on Admiralism having a mainly Central or Decentral government, the type he advocates is dependent on the situation the country has, although he would be leaning on the federal side as he believes that not every decision should be made in the capital and that overcentralization is inefficient in solving issues as it could cause major problems, he would be mainly Federal if the Country is diverse like India, the Philippines, and Indonesia, in the cases of countries such as Bolivia, Russia, China, and Canada where there is a majority with significant minority communities however, he would still remain federal albeit more centralized with the aim for having a Plurinational government, he would be Unitary on the cases if a country is homogenous and small such as Singapore and both Koreas.

Local communities
the idea of popular assemblies, particularly on villages and small towns is something that interests Admiralism, as it can be potentially efficient on decision making on those very subdivisions, the way how these assemblies work will be similar to the basic people's congresses in Gaddafi's Libya, where those assemblies will still abide to national laws, although the state and national government wouldn't make the personal decision making unless such assembly contradicts national law and that the degree of influence by the state would be little and that the assembly, he will make the state and national government provide some support to those assemblies however, essentially creating a semi-federal governmental system.

he also believes that rejection of the woke agenda should start from the bottom up, with those very communities rejecting and condemning the woke agenda and it's attempts to influence and indoctrinate as well as protecting the populace against advocates of such threat with online influencers being one of them, such influence of those communities will reach the state level and finally the national level.

The justice system
He is supportive of rehabilitation, as he believes that people have a chance to reintegrate back into becoming useful and respectful members of society, although there are limits to how many chances he will give, as he also believes that whilst people do have a chance to reintegrate, there are also people who can lie and manipulate the authorities through the rehabilitive system and continue their criminal actions, thus, the punishment for a crime will be harsher every time it's repeated and every time rehabilitation is done, they will have to do community service for a period of time, he also doesn't want prisons to be neither hellholes for prisoners, nor hotel style like Norwegian prisons, as to minimize brutality and the chance of escape for prisoners

On minor crimes, he believes that the punishment should be light, where as on more serious crimes, rehabilitation will still be applied, but the punishment will be harsher. The death penalty will be applied, but only if those serious crimes were to be repeated often.

Police
He likes the idea of a well equipped police force, as a strong police force may help combat criminal activity more effectively, he is however against police brutality, and is personally fine with an unmilitarized police as long as they are still armed and can fulfill their role effectively.

He also believes in police reform, as he believes that the police for should not only be less brutal and less corrupt, but also to be more efficient and effective on fulfilling it's role on maintaining public order and safety, enforcing the law, and preventing, detecting, and investigating criminal activities.

[[File:GRights.png]] Gun Ownership
Gun Ownership is allowed, as it becomes much harder for foreign imperialists to subjugate and conquer an armed populace, however, he understands the negative effects of gun rights, but still wishes to maintain it, so his solution is that a gun license is required if you were to own one, those with a criminal record or are mentally unfit however are not permitted to own a gun, plus, a mental health test will be done yearly for gun owners to prove if a citizen is still responsible enough to wield firearms, a gun safe is also required for all those who bear firearms.

despite such regulations and background checks implemented to prevent criminals from taking advantage for such, he refuses to let a law-abiding citizen denied having the right to bear arms, for it would be considered tyranny to him as to deny one the right to wield firearms would be unjust if one is responsible and goodwilled.

[[File:Dem.png]] Type of government
Depending on the situation, if it's on a nation that is still stable, he supports a semi-direct democratic republic that would crack down hard on nepotism, lobbying, usury, and corruption so it can stay true to it's name of "rule of the people", to further ensure this, he would implement a ranked voting system, and a single-term limit that lasts up to 5 years.

when it's on a nation that is unstable and poor, he supports a modified Vanguardist system that would adopt libertarian aspects such as direct democracy, freedom of speech, net neutrality, cultural and informal freedoms, and the allowance of the criticism of the government, likening to the idea of a benevolent dictatorship, in which that dictatorship will ultimately transition into the semi-direct democracy as he mentioned earlier once the situation is stabilized, the reason why those modifications are in place is because not only to prevent the vanguard party from being corrupt, overly bureaucratic, and inefficient, but to make the transition to democracy possible, although some of those elements wouldn't be implemented until some time on the early stages of the formation of the Avante-garde state on certain cases.

Republicanism
Admiralism believes that there should be a republic, as he wants a constitutional government ruled by the people and that political power should be obtained through effort, he also wants to promote egalitarianism to the masses and that a leader must have his limits when ruling, thus he is against almost all forms of monarchism, as he is belligerent and disavowal on the idea of that one must obtain power and leadership just through a royal background and that one must rule till abdication/death, he also believes that it encourages elitism, which something Admiralism goes against.

[[File:Mediastocracy_flair.png]] News and Media
Admiralism is heavily opposed to the polarization of media as it would result in society becoming totalitarian and illiterate through manufactured consent and bias, with this in mind, he supports the fairness doctrine, where in discussing serious matters, opposing viewpoints would be represented equally and fairly in order to prevent such negative effects from happening.

Freedom of speech
Admiralism is a firm believer of freedom of speech, and is a defender towards the free marketplace of ideals, however, he believes in the paradox of tolerance, in that belief, if society is tolerant without limit, the intolerant shall destroy any semblance of tolerance, thus, he will not support anyone that wishes to destroy the free marketplace of ideals, he will also not support speech that is defamation or incitement, he believes in this because if you try to damage a person's reputation for no good reason, encourage a person to hurt any group of people, or deny the right to freedom towards others all because of differing ideological beliefs, you will face punishment, to describe this belief in his own words, The only ones that are allowed to be intolerant are those who are willingly going to suffer intolerance.

He despises hate speech laws, as he believes that they are discriminatory in nature and that they enforce the woke agenda, as hate speech laws wish to protect certain groups from harm through safe spaces, the supremacists of said groups can take advantage of this and discriminate others not affected by those laws and get off scot-free without harm.

Populism
A populist himself(left-wing populist specifically), Admiralism endorses it as he believes that populism can be a force of good, as it can be used to unite and rally the people as well as promote meaningful change for the better against problems such as social injustice, wealth inequality, elitism, corruption, and most especially imperialism, which is why he supports people such as Evo Morales and Huey Long, as they wanted to reform their respective countries for the better through a nationalist and anti-imperialist rhetoric alongside left-wing economic reforms that help the struggling populace.

he does understand that populism can be a double-edged sword however, as populism can also be used as a tool by those who wish to further cause problems and ruin the name of populism, notably by reactionaries and more especially neoliberal economists masked as populists, which explains why he isn't fond of most right-wing populists such as Bolsonaro and Modi, as both have used it to gain power and use such power to implement horrendous policies such as elitist neoliberal economics that would worsen the socioeconomic conditions of the people.

Means of achievement
As it is situation dependent, Admiralism prefers either reform or revolution, he would prefer reform whenever possible, but in cases where any attempt of reform is dire, when the implementation of reforms are too slow, or when it is in a dictatorship, he will advocate for a revolution, on a revolution, he would mainly use non-violent tactics, but will resort to violence if those peaceful methods are being suppressed, as those that make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable

Once in power, he would make a slow, gradual and steady process implementing his ideals, he would reject forcefully indoctrinating the populace to follow his ideals, as it may weaken the support for the system, instead he will demonstrate the strengths of his ideals through the populace as it may increase the support for the system.

Overall
In regards to this, Admiralism Prefers to be closer to the Center in this regard, as he has a notable dislike for extreme progressivism and reactionary thought. He hates the former for being so Invested against reactionaryism all for the sake of progress that it ends up becoming regressive and xenophobic, and He hates the latter for being against any sort of development of society due to him being fanatical and zealous in defending tradition, because of that, this can result in an endless cycle of hatred where the actual problems in society are left largely unchecked and in which the populace would be heavily divided by fanatical identity politics, in which the only ones who would benefit from the cycle are those greedy and powerful in which those very people would fuel the fire all for their personal gain.

With that being said, He supports a delicate balance between conservatism and progressivism, wanting to preserve tradition whilst also valuing societal progress, as he believes that the preservation of tradition helps keep human values and morality as it's what makes humans unique and that societal progression is necessary for the development of not only a nation, but to humanity as well, and that it helps us to be accepting of others.

Formerly a new leftist, he is now an old leftist and thus opposes new leftism, as he sees the adherents of new leftism as radlibs who shill for the plutocratic establishment as they have abandoned the working class and the fight for economic egalitarianism all in favor bullshit Identity Politics brought in by the neoliberal elite, he also believes that SJWs are a plot done by the managerial elite to prevent meaningful change for the greater good by starting a meaningless war on the basis of identity politics.

Racism
Admiralism opposes racism and sees it as stupid, as he sees viewing a man for his/her race and/or ethnicity as an act of abandoning morality, as people should be considered by the content of their character, neither by the skin of their color nor by the blood of their ancestors, with this, he wants to have a colorblind society where all races and ethnicities to be equal under the law and have the same treatment.

Formerly a supporter of BLM, he now opposes it ever since woke culture advocates, black supremacists, and police abolitionists took over the movement even if the movement had some good points such as their opposition against unjust police brutality, he also opposes racially motivated crimes and wishes to make the harshness of those crimes greater, thus he will go against ethnic and racial supremacist groups such as the alt-right, he also goes against woke methods of countering it such as critical race theory, the reasons why are that both the Alt-right and the Woke Left want to have a society reformed with the bases of racial obsession and hatred and that their methods only serve to fuel the fire of a continuous cycle of hatred that can halt societal progression.

[[File:Gay.png]][[File:Bix.png]] Opinion on LGBT [[File:Les.png]][[File:Trans.png]][[File:Enby.png]]
As this topic is extremely contentious, He feels nervous when talking about it, in his beliefs however, He believes That LGBT individuals are equals and willingly allows them to live so long as they remain respectful to others and do not force their own agenda, he hates the idea that LGBT people should either be Idolized and Glorified like literal deities  or Ostracized and Demonized like  barbaric monsters  and believes that those individuals shouldn't be judged by their identity, but the content of their character.

Admiralism however, hates pride month and wishes to regulate it, not only because it focuses on the promotion of excessive Identity Politics, but more importantly, it allows the greedy to further their interests and prevent the populace from realizing that such oppressive establishment wants to make society conform into their unjust ambitions. In order to combat this, he would limit the amount of weeks of the event, he would also prohibit the bringing of children on pride month, as he sees this as a bad influence for the youth.

He would allow Homosexuals to have civil unions/marriages and also approves the right to transition as long as the person has gender dysphoria but he won't make it the first method of dealing with dysphoria unless the case of dysphoria is severe and will only use it after other methods of treatment have failed(although he will accept tucutes for the time being), but he will only recognize two genders and is against the abolition and discouragement of traditional marriage and family, as he sees this as a part of what made humanity rise up to the ashes and become a powerful species, and he is very discontent with the current LGBT community and agenda as it endorses things such as xenogenders, neopronouns, genderfluidity, and polyamory, in which he wouldn't consider these ideas progressive at all, but rather the manifestation of the negative aspects of identity politics, in which it would make identity far more important than anything else and would promote the aforementioned endless cycle of hatred, thus, he would discourage the populace from being promotive of those ideals and ban any sort of teachings of it on schools.

whilst he will allow conversion therapy to help individuals suffering from gender dysphoria, he doesn't want it to be mandatory and enforced on the aforementioned individuals, as it may potentially only cause insult to injury.

he is interested in the idea of promoting LGBT movements that are against LGBT supremacism and the woke agenda, as they can prove useful to not only combat discrimination against LGBT individuals, but also fight against the ever growing threat that is woke plague at the same time.

Physical and Mental Health
Admiralism wishes to kickstart an anti-smoking, anti-obesity, and anti-drug campaigns, wishing to make the populace as healthy as possible, both mentally and physically, on his opinion towards mental disorders, he wishes to give adequate support and treatment to those suffering with them(IE: gender dysphoria, depression and overanxiety, bi-polarity, schizophrenia, autism, and eating disorders), He however vehemently loaths the utter glorification of mental illnesses and the issue of mental health overall, especially amongst woke groups and wishes to discourage the population of such Romanticization, he also despises those that self-diagnose.

On a personal level, Admiralism is an autist, as while he may have been gifted with some potential talent such as swimming and intellect, this has hindered his social skills as well as the ability to communicate and understand with others which has made him become prone to exploitation through constant teasing in the past, so much to the point it actually becomes bullying at times, which has resulted in his confidence being shattered often.

Youth
A moderate Adultist, Admiralism believes Parents should have control over their child(ren) since Adults have significantly greater experience and knowledge, however, he also believes that Parents should also give their child(ren) love and happiness and they should teach them morals such as kindness as well as disavow any sort of misinformation given to their child(ren).

He wants to promote Apoliticism to the youth as he wants them to enjoy their lives and believes that politics should be recommended and tackled once they reach adulthood, thus he will discourage political youth wings, all political media aimed towards the youth, and youth activism in general(he will also eventually prohibit them all once a certain point has reached) seeing how all 3 of these things are often used to enforce an agenda through indoctrination(eg:calling a ideology objectively correct and flawless), in which he strongly disavows, he also wants prohibit teachers bringing political gear as well as strictly limit teaching politics to history only, and on the topic of that, he wants history to be taught without bias and without misinformation, he will also disavow schools from promoting political agendas, especially if the agenda promoted is dedicated to destroying the free marketplace of ideals(eg: woke "progressivism" and Alt-Right "conservatism").

[[File:Envi.png]] Environmentalism
Admiralism believes that the environment is sacred and wishes to combat climate change and pollution, believing that it is integral to the earth itself and without it, may cause a great deal of negative effects such as drought, rising of sea levels, and erosion that can potentially devastate communities and nations, he combats this through means such as the the following: on a sense, his environmentalist stance is a synthetic union between eco-capitalism, eco socialism, bright-green environmentalism, eco-authoritarianism, and eco conservatism, but he would be primarily a bright-green environmentalist.
 * implementation of a carbon tax
 * lowering the tax of renewable energy
 * transitioning to renewable energy with nuclear power being the primary source of energy
 * begin a gradual dismantling process of all coal fired and oil fired plants and ban them entirely once the aforementioned transition to renewable energy is done.
 * requiring mining industries to submit plans to phase out on coal and oil and replace it with green hydrogen
 * encouragement on recycling
 * planting millions to billions of trees and restore habitats
 * punish those that were to do harm to the environment and enforce laws such as the prohibition of illegal mining, illegal logging, illegal fishing, and poaching
 * introduction and promotion of eco-friendly products
 * creating eco friendly jobs and gradually promote and expand said jobs
 * begin a gradual transition to zero-emission transport
 * usage of a climate change commission
 * the promotion of research on eco-friendly technology
 * educating the populace of the dangers of climate change and begin defunding media and politicians that actively downplay climate change.
 * gradually discourage the usage of single-use, non biodegradable and non reusable plastic materials and eventually ban it entirely.
 * building national parks in order to preserve wildlife
 * Eliminate Fracking and redirect the funds from that into research for renewable energy
 * Give natural meadows and wildflowers to threatened populations of pollinators such as bees and butterflies
 * Repeal subsidies that encourage urban sprawl and discourage local farming and production, and encourage local media outlets and chambers of commerce to promote buying locally
 * Prioritize new distribution technologies for waste, with particular concern for the oceans which are vital to a healthy earth
 * Strengthen laws against animal abuse and neglect, including stricter regulation of factory farms and stockyards and the repeal of food disparagement laws and so-called ag-gag laws that prohibit free speech regarding animal agriculture
 * Never let a single home in the nation lack access from clean drinking water and fresh food

Religious matters
In this matter, Admiralism supports Secularism Believing that freedom of religion should be allowed and allows people to convert to other faiths or leave them as well but also supports the separation of church and state as well as significantly limiting the influence of clergy and religious organizations where their influence is small scale, he is against both a Religious Theocracy nor State Atheism, as he is against the former because having laws heavily based off Religion alone will impede on significant progress, and he is against the latter because it has a tendency to adhere to state worship and ultimately Extreme Authoritarianism(as demonstrated in some Marxist-Leninist states), in which he opposes as well, such policies will be softer on religious countries however but will get harder gradually.

Businesses will have the right to close on sundays, but he doesn't want to force that law on all businesses and is alright if a business wishes to not close on a sunday.

he is fine with some religious influence on the government despite his secularist beliefs particularly in religious countries, as long as it isn't theocratic and that it allows others to practice their beliefs freely, he also wants to introduce some sectors on ideals like cultural Christianity/Islam/Buddhism/etc depending on the country, as he likes some cultural impacts of religion with the promotion of morality being one of them(even if it's not a necessity to be religious in order to adhere to morals).

Stances on Abortion
In this stance, Admiralism has a somewhat of an opposition to abortion, as he is slowly gaining into the belief that abortion might be murder, but his primary reason on why he hates about it is that it has a rather strong link to the normalization of sexual degeneracy and mindless consumerism, in which he himself heavily opposes those things due to them being interconnected with neoliberal consumer culture, his reasoning overall is that to deny the right of life to a fetus all for selfish desires is wrong, and believes that abortion is only allowed for these very reasons: if the fetus is impaired or is a product of rape, if the mother's life/health is at risk, or if premature pregnancy, he also is sympathetic to Texas' abortion laws, but not the entirety of it, as it goes too far on some aspects, mainly on outlawing it on the cases of fetal impairment, rape, and at the mother's life/health being at risk, he believes that 6 weeks is enough time to get rid of an unwanted pregnancy, as the time after those very 6 weeks, the fetus gets a heartbeat, indicating a status of life.

Despite this opposition, he personally understands that some mothers do abortion because of their terrible socioeconomic status, but he still opposes abortion, so his solution is through strong family welfare policies akin to Poland's model, One may also get an abortion if they are suffering from domestic violence, however, there should be an investigation done by the police as to check for lies, if the woman is not lying about it, compensation is given, but otherwise, she will face arrest.

for the time being, he proposes that unrestricted abortions will be allowed on the first trimester but the second and third trimesters will have the abortion laws be put into place, as he may need to be pragmatic and have a tangible goal even if it may seem wrong in his own morals.

He will have the state provide birth control and sexual education however, as he goes against anything that forces one to have a baby even on the cases of fetal impairment, rape, and at the mother's life/health being at risk, and calls those who want to force such onto others not pro-life, but pro birth, as they have no care at all towards a woman's well being, as being pro-life is not only protecting the right to life for a baby against unreasonable abortion, but to protect a mother's life and well being, ideally abortion would be banned with the exception of the aforementioned cases, but only if the populace(especially female) agrees on that very law.

He is aware that it won’t happen overnight, and therefore, wishes to do the following, starting from beginning to end:


 * Increase access to healthcare mainly in areas with little access to health services
 * Have local communities, especially rural ones, denounce abortion. Rural ones in particular are chosen due to their more conservative nature
 * Implement a nationwide law criminalizing pro-abortion propaganda
 * Promote anti-abortion ideals, comparing it to murder
 * Decrease allowance to get an abortion to the first 3 months of a pregnancy
 * Repeal Roe V Wade, and ban abortion in all cases except for the following: fetal impairment, rape, incest, any situation where the mother or baby are at risk

Pornography
Admiralism is an opposer of pornography, as well as prostitution, as he seems them as bad for several reasons, it can potentially degrade a person's moral well being, it is exploitative, and that it's a part of mindless neoliberal consumer culture, thus he wants to make prostitution illegal as well as criminalized where those who do such will be subject to rehabilitative treatment and re-education, he will also ban porn sites nationwide, though some people can potentially still access those sites through a VPN, it can be said that Admiralism will also ban vpns to circumvent the issue, but he sees banning vpns as a violation of internet civil liberties, thus he will promote propaganda dedicated to opposing pornography and prostitution.

On a personal level however, he is fine with temporary consensual sex as long as it's part of a long term relationship as well and not meant for cheating and promiscuity, as a former coomer himself, Admiralism has acknowledged that Pornography is a drug that can be really addicting.

Science and Technology
Admiralism is a supporter to scientific advancements, as he believes it can bring many positive effects to society, with science enhancing the overall intelligence of the populace and helps with the advancement of technology, in which it could keep society advance with those very technologies being helpful to solving problems, he is however against transhumanism and automation, as he is intolerant of the populace turning into robots and AI taking over jobs and increasing unemployment.

He is an adherent to the policies technoliberalism, as he believes that technological progress should be promoted and be available to the general public, and that he also cherishes civil liberties as well and use that technology to preserve it.

Big tech and corrupt elitists overall on technology
However, he believes that the power of technological advancement shouldn't be concentrated to the elites, as it can negatively affect society due to those very elites using this power to control and dictate society on their own horrid terms as seen in big tech, where they use such technology to promote aspects of woke culture as seen evident by the constant promotion of things such as xenogenderism, genderfluidity, neopronouns, and the normalization of the LGBT agenda, making products sympathetic to the calling of wokeness, the call-out and ostracization of individuals who do not support such horrid agenda, and the abolishment of free speech and discrimination of those sympathetic to the free marketplace of ideas and political opinions all in favor of "political correctness" advocated by elitist radlibs under a leftist facade.

he is sympathetic to pirate politics and is promotive of laws that put people before corporations and wishes to implement the following things to greatly limit the influence of corrupt elites on the internet: On other things such as Porn sites, Child porn, and the dark web, he will put a ban on them however, seeing them as things that can potentially harm the populace.
 * Significant copyright and patent law reforms that favor the people over corporations
 * direct E-democracy
 * Laws that protect personal information and data of individuals
 * net neutrality
 * pro-free speech laws that give people the right to sue companies that censor them
 * strong freedom of information laws
 * anti-monopolization laws
 * Digital service tax
 * Hold big tech companies liable for their crimes
 * promote alternatives to counter the woke agenda
 * create strong anti trust laws and regulations as well as force big companies to pay taxes on a fair share, those that do not abide shall be dismantled, such taxes will go to welfare, education, healthcare, housing, infrastructure and rural development programs, as well as technological and scientific development.

Interculturalist ideals
Admiralism adheres to interculturalism because he sees this as the perfect unity between the acceptance of different cultures and a unified cultural identity, he seeks to fight both the self-segregationist and divisive tendencies of multiculturalism and the imperialistic and discriminatory notions of monoculturalist assimilation through the notions of brotherhood and unity.

the reason behind this is because interculturalism can bring in the benefits of a common identity and cohesion a primarily multicultural society wouldn't have as different cultures would self-segregate and ultimately fight against each other due to a lack of unity whilst fighting the discriminatory and prejudicial notions of monoculturalist policies that would oppress the lives of other people with different cultures and start a cycle of continuous hatred where the values of people such as empathy, ingenuity, compassion, and ETC are all cast aside for identity.

Overall
a patriot, he supports the right of national self-determination as he believes that a nation should have the right to maintain sovereignty, he is also skeptical towards most forms of globalism, whilst uniting humanity may seem like a cool idea to him, due to most globalists disregarding national sovereignty and self-determination, he sees this as imperialist which is unacceptable to him, the one major exception to this is alter-globalization, as it advocates for a world free from evils of imperialism and is sympathetic to preserving the sovereignty and self determination of nations, because of his anti-imperialist and egalitarian rhetoric, he is also skeptical towards xenophobic and extreme forms of nationalism, with ultranationalism, ethnic nationalism, racial nationalism, and especially most(if not all) forms of fascism being examples of such.

Civic Nationalism
He considers himself a civic nationalist, believing that a person's citizenship shouldn't be based on arbitrary ethnic and racial identity, but instead through common values, where patriots regardless of race and ethnicity are all united as a community through brotherhood, unity, and national pride where they help others struggling in their nation and solve the nation's apparent struggles such as economic inequality and the threat of imperialism.

Immigration
Admiralism is tolerant to those that wish to immigrate to the nation and thus wants to ease the process of legal immigration, however, he also believes that they shouldn't go in willy nilly scot free and self-segregate, thus he expects that immigrants must be required to learn the nation's culture, history, and language if they are to stay in the nation, this will be done and proven through a test which is also a requirement to obtain citizenship, he will also crack down on illegal immigration and will not allow anyone with a criminal record from entering.

he still prioritizes citizens over immigrants and wishes for most citizens to be employed, as a nations is lacking of a meaning without native citizens, non-citizens are also not allowed to vote other than in popular assemblies in villages and small towns if they ever live at these areas.

[[File:Globnat.png]] Foreign Policy [[File:Isolationist.png]]
Preferably an Isolationist, Admiralism prefers to mainly solve the nation's own problems, but because of his anti-imperialist rhetoric, he will help and aid nations in a struggle against imperialism if the time comes, thus he is an Alter-Globalist as well, as he works with other countries for mutual cooperation to advance technology while fighting both imperialism and economic globalization.

He doesn't like forcing ideas on other countries, as he considers it as an act of subjugation and therefore an imperialist motive, instead, he prefers to spread his ideology not through force, but by demonstrating the successes and strengths of his ideals and allowing other countries to learn it and give the choice to adopt his ideals or not through free will.

He is sympathetic to Democratization on Countries having protests, but goes against intervention, as well as anything that supports major powers (IE:the EU and NATO), as he believes that democracy should be brought by the people of their own nation and not by the forces of foreign powers and thus opposes backing protests in other nations.

Military
He is a centrist on the militarist-pacifist scale, as he believes that a strong military is needed to protect the nation from terrorists and imperialists, but believes that it should primarily be used for defense and that he doesn't want to go overboard on military spending.

He Dislikes the Concept of Conscription as he believes that people should serve the military through free will and not by force, and only wishes to apply it on dire situations as a last resort.

On the idea of nukes, he supports the dismantling of nuclear weaponry, as the effects of a nuclear weapon can cause potential harm and can be potentially used by imperialists to forcibly coerce a nation into it's demands through the threat of annihilation, though in practice, it may not end well since it was among the reasons why Imperial Japan was forced to surrender and that all countries must comply to denuclearization

Admiralism is also supportive of civilian militaries and paramilitias, since they can be used to protect the country from threats such as imperialists and insurgent terrorists.

he also endorses the glorification of the military, as they are a key component in defending the nation and has no problem with such events being held at schools or places in general that honor special forces, he is against the glorification of crimes and atrocities committed by military forces however and wants to teach the horrors of those very crimes and give them reasons on why they are horrible.

[[File:Cball-US.png]] [[File:European Federalism.png]] [[File:Necon.png]] West vs East [[File:Cball-China.png]] [[File:Cball-Russia.png]]
He neither supports the first world(led by great powers of the west being the US, France, Germany, The UK, and Japan) nor the second world(led by great powers of the east being Russia and China), instead, he supports and aligns himself to the third world and the non-aligned movement because he sees it as compatible for the strengthening of the anti-imperialist motive and wishes to protect the sovereignty of weaker nations, seeing how NATO and the EU have threaded on the sovereignty of other nations(through foreign intervention and installation of puppet dictators for NATO's case and Neoliberal economic and social policies being forced on European nations for the EU's case) and both Russian and Chinese aggression potentially threating the national self-determination of other nations(with Ukraine and even Belarus as examples for Russia's case, and Southeast-Asian nations as an example for China's case).

The United Nations
He hates the UN for the reason of being a tool by great powers to further imperialist acts and intentions regardless of whether reasons of backing such are self-serving excuses or not, much like how he would he doesn't want to destroy the UN, rather to destroy it and create it anew washed clean of it's sins, or in other words, implement significant reforms that put greater emphasis on ideas such as economic self-reliance and national self-determination akin to the proposal of a new international economic order, whilst maintaining policies such as defense of human rights and cooperation between nations with those very polices being tweaked to favor economic self-reliance and national self-determination.

Afghanistan
The U.S war in Afghanistan unlike other American interventions had at least some sort of reasonable justification, but the way the war was handled was pretty horrible, although he sees that pulling home the troops might have some reason, leaving the Afghan people unarmed and defenseless against the Taliban wouldn't be something that would be supported by Admiralism, as he thinks if the US army should really leave,they should only do this once the Afghan people are armed and readily defensive against the Taliban.

Artsakh
Artsakh belongs to Armenia, for Azerbaijan's treatment on it can be called nothing but cruel for it's unjustified racism against ethnic Armenians on the region.

Belarus
Whilst Admiralism understands that the Belarusian people want civil liberties and democracy, he doesn't want Belarus to fall into the hands of the EU, seeing how Berlin and Paris have swayed their damn dicks and impeded on the sovereignty of other nations in the EU, thus he is against EU-backed Belarusian protestors, his opinion on Lukashenko is mixed though leaning positive, he is sympathetic to his economic policies and his nationalist stance, but is antipathetic to his brutality, corruption, and as of recent events, the border war with Poland and weaponization of immigrants.

Cyprus
Admiralism supports Cyprus over Northern Cyprus, seeing how Northern Cyprus lacks an actually good reason to exist as a legitimate state since it's basically a failed Turkish puppet state.

The EU
Admiralism is a soft Eurosceptic, seeing how the EU has threaded on the national sovereignty of European nations through forcing horrid neoliberal economic and social policies, although he accepts things such as free travel policies and economic cooperation, thus, he wants to reform the EU where it still maintains the free travel policies and economic cooperation it has, but put greater emphasis on national self-determination and economic self-reliance, in short, the EU is horrid and if the nations of Europe are to be united, then the EU must be destroyed and recreated anew, washed clean of it's nation-threading sins.

Israel
Admiralism understands that the Jews wish to escape antisemitism, but he hates the concept of Zionism as it is ethnic nationalist, something Admiralism rather hates, though he wants to protect innocent Palestinians from the wrath of the Israeli government and military, he doesn't favor Hamas' rather anti-semitic and extremely islamist rhetoric either, so his proposal is either a two state solution where both nations can equally coexist peacefully, or a one state solution where both Israel and Palestine are unified under a multi-ethnic, interculturalist, civic nationalist, and anti-imperialist state under the slogan of brotherhood and unity akin to like Tito's Yugoslavia

Kosovo
the conflict between Albania and Serbia on the very nation of Kosovo shows the dreadful negatives of ethnic nationalism, thus in order to prevent this, Admiralism advocates that the majority Albanian areas belong to Albania and that the Majority Serbian areas belong to Serbia, though the minorities of those areas should be given respect.

Somaliland
Admiralism believes that Somaliland is a sovereign nation that has the right to self-determination, and is more prosperous and stable than the country having a claim to it's sovereignty, Somalia, a failed state where lawlessness and corrupt and abusive authoritarianism are rampant, AKA, the typical Anarcho-Capitalist society when put into practice where there are very little economic regulations or maybe even none.

Syria
He supports Rojava as well as Assad to an extent(although he isn't fond of Assad's rather authoritarian views and gas attack tactics), as both are fighters against imperialism, he opposes the current Turkish government, ISIL, and the Syrian opposition, his reasons why are being Erdogan having imperialist ambitions, ISIL for being a fanatical war crime loving jihadist terrorist organization ,and the Syrian opposition for being backed by imperialists such as the aforementioned Turkish government.

=Ideology Ranking= Note: this is just my opinion on things

Very Based

 * [[File:Leftnat.png]] Left-Wing Nationalism
 * [[File:Globnat.png]] Alter-Globalization
 * [[File:Marketsoc.png]] Market Socialism
 * [[File:Progconf.png]] Progressive Conservatism
 * [[File:Dsa.png]] Democratic Socialism
 * [[File:Ectrans.png]] Technogaianism
 * [[File:Civnat.png]] Civic Nationalism
 * [[File:Tito.png]] Titoism
 * [[File:Kemal.png]] Kemalism
 * [[File:Distributist.png]] Distributism
 * Republicanismpix.png Republicanism

Based

 * [[File:Socdem.png]] Social Democracy
 * [[File:Lpop.png]] Left-Wing Populism
 * [[File:Keynes.png]] Keynesianism
 * [[File:Soc21.png]] Socialism of the 21st Century
 * [[File:Consocf.png]] Conservative Socialism
 * [[File:Soc.png]] Socialism
 * [[File:Soccap.png]] Social Capitalism
 * [[File:Patcon.png]] Paternalistic Conservatism

Basedish

 * [[File:Socauth.png]] Social Authoritarianism
 * [[File:Gaddafi.png]] Gaddafism
 * [[File:Natprog.png]] Bull Moose Progressivism
 * [[File:Demcon.png]] Democratic Confederalism

Neutral/Bringe/IDK

 * [[File:Sec.png]] Authoritarianism
 * [[File:ML.png]] Marxism-Leninism
 * [[File:Ormarxf.png]] Marxism
 * [[File:Cap.png]] Capitalism
 * [[File:Plcn2.png]] Paleoconservatism

Cringish

 * [[File:Rpop.png]] Right-Wing Populism
 * [[File:Ancom.png]] Anarcho-Communism
 * [[File:Libertarian.png]] Libertarianism
 * [[File:Hayek.png]] Hayekism

Cringe

 * [[File:Ancapf.png]] Anarcho-Capitalism
 * [[File:Mao.png]] Maoism
 * [[File:3way.png]] Third Way
 * [[File:Ultranat.png]] Ultranationalism
 * [[File:Racenat.png]] Racial Nationalism
 * [[File:Ethnonat.png]] Ethnic Nationalism
 * [[File:Austrobert.png]] Austrolibertarianism
 * [[File:Jihad.png]] Jihadism
 * [[File:Mansphere.png]] Manosphere
 * [[File:Radfem.png]] Radical Feminism
 * [[File:Stateath.png]] State Atheism
 * [[File:Ultraprogressivism.png]] Revolutionary Progressivism
 * [[File:React.png]] Reactionarism
 * [[File:Altr.png]] Alt-Right
 * [[File:Christy.png]] [[File:Muslim 2.png]] [[File:JewTheo.png]] Theocracies [[File:Bud.png]] [[File:Hind.png]]
 * [[File:Monarch.png]] Monarchism
 * [[File:Abmon.png]] Absolute Monarchism

Very Cringe

 * [[File:Obj.png]] Objectivism
 * [[File:Avar.png]] Avaritionism
 * [[File:Corpcuck.png]] Corporatocracy
 * [[File:Plutocrat.png]] Plutocracy
 * [[File:Bankocracy.png]] Bankocracy
 * [[File:Necon.png]] Neoconservatism
 * [[File:Imp.png]] Imperialism
 * [[File:Neoliberal-icon.png]] Neoliberalism
 * [[File:Pinkcap.png]] Pink Capitalism
 * [[File:Statlib.png]] State Liberalism
 * [[File:Ford.png]] Fordism

=Opinion on Historical Figures=

Based

 * Mustafa Kemal Atatürk - An capable leader that has built Turkey ground up from a backwards Islamic empire to a nation free from the chains of imperialism where equality and progress are valued and achieved, you could be too extreme on secularism and that you are too harsh on the Kurds, but nonetheless you are an honorable man.
 * Josip Broz Tito - You were an incredibly based anti-fascist Yugoslav freedom fighter and leader who has brought peace and happiness to the people of Yugoslavia through pragmatic market socialist economics and the slogan of brotherhood and unity, you also formed the Non-aligned movement alongside others which was also incredibly based, sure you were somewhat too brutal, but I will never deny the positives you have brought.
 * Thomas Sankara - Other than what you did to those striking teachers, not only are you a legendary anti-colonial hero for Burkina Faso but a martyr to Africa's poor, a shame that the French Imperialists had to kill you.
 * Abraham Lincoln - One of the most based presidents of America, fighting for the equality of races in America through outlawing slavery and fighting against the Confederate separatists is indeed noble.
 * Qaboos Bin Said - Incredibly based for a Monarch, especially when it's an absolutist one, turning Oman into a stable and prosperous country and giving the Omani people a future has made you worthy to my eyes to call you based.

Basedish

 * Muammar Gaddafi - Despite all your faults such as supporting some bad people like Charles Taylor and Idi Amin, as well as your brutality, you were still a based anti-imperialist that made Libya reach heights never seen before.
 * Rodrigo Duterte - not the desirable president for my country to have as you're somewhat too brutal for my liking and that you can be hypocritical at times, but I respect your efforts and a good chunk of your policies such as the 10 point agenda, the blueprint you set up is ideal for achieving a golden age for my country with the right modifications.

Bringe

 * Donald Trump - I'd wish you were elected for a second term instead of Biden gaining presidency, with that being said, I hate how you frequently cucked yourself to the Israeli government and plutocratic establishment, although I like how you lessened American intervention(though you're still interventionist sadly) and that your supporters are working class citizens.

Cringish

 * Mao Zedong - your early chairmanship is remarkable with the progress you have made to the PRC, but everything after that such as this cultural revolution bullshit and great leap forward, as well as your support for Mobutu and Khmer Rouge is nothing but a slideshow of your incompetency and horridness.

Cringe
=Relations=
 * Boris Yeltsin - By far the worst leader of Russia by a long shot, for you have did something so vile that not even tyrants like Stalin and kakistocrats like Nicholas II would do, sell your own country to foreign imperialists and plunge your nation alongside those imperialists to it's lowest point through your corrupt and plutocratic system.
 * Justin Trudeau - I have no words, other than your state liberal-esque shitass is deserving to go to hell, fuck your corruption and fuck your wokeness.
 * Recep Tayyip Erdoğan - You indeed have proven yourself to be the prostitute of the world, hanging out on whoever is most rich and powerful, not only that, you're but a disgrace to your nation for your ambitions to restore the unwanted and backwards Ottoman nation is even more proof that you're not a circus director, but the entirety of the clown industry.
 * Hideki Tojo - To hell with you and your demonic acts against all the people you have conquered in your disrespectful and unjustified path towards racial supremacy.
 * Ronald Reagan - You, you are amongst the very men who plunged America into madness through your imperialist acts, plutocratic polarization, and inhumane deeds, regardless if the reason of "freedom and democracy" is truly believed or a self-serving excuse, such horrors shall never be justified.

Best Friends

 * [[File:EvolvingSoc.png]] DuyQuangNguyenPham - based Ideology, based guy, you get the virtual head pat.
 * [[File:Scarlet Icon.png]] ScarletTheVampireQueen - A really good friend from the anarchy wiki with an incredibly based ideology, may probably be my best friend in the community.

Friends

 * [[File:GenShrekf.png]] Comrade Shrek - Cool and epic gamer, Even if his ideology can be a bit too radical.
 * [[File:NeoImmorx.png]] Immorxius - like the above, is another cool friend and an epic gamer
 * [[File:Liberalsoc.png]] The-statist-AnarchistT - Pretty friendly and suprisingly cool for a V*ushite.
 * [[File:Heinrich Cheung.png]] Heinrich Cheung - An epic and funny gamer ,cringe ideology though but still ,Mongoloid gang
 * [[File:Typicalfan2.png]] Typicalfan4 - A funny Mexican dude who seems pretty friendly bringe ideology though ,still a decent dude.
 * [[File:Mladorossi.png]] NazBolGANG12 - the first guy I ever had interactions with since I met him in the former PCB fandom wiki ,he seems decent
 * [[File:Eyebrowsism.png]] EugeneTLT - Goodbye Comrade, you served well.
 * [[File:Stalin2929.png]] Stalin2929 - A friendly guy and a memer, I'm doubtful about the stalinist policies though ,but cultural centrism is a go to for me.
 * [[File:Christianright.png]] SomeCrusader - Bringe Ideology, pretty decent guy
 * [[File:NSL.png]] Pirate Tails - kinda based ideology, is le funni memer and of course socialism is antisemitic, that is what makes it based [[File:Troll.png]]
 * [[File:Dengf.png]] ChineseSocialist - a cool friend with a good ideology even if it's too Dengist we shall exterminate the C*nadian menace for the greater good of the Mongoloid horde
 * [[File:Avelicius.png]] Joogotakensaad - good ideology, you're also a pretty cool guy as well.
 * [[File:Councilguy.png]] Councilguy - Okay Ideology ,though you can be a bit too radical ,but I guess you aren't mean ,so that's a plus
 * [[File:Mutalist.png]] Bsaheed527 [[File:Anpostleft.png]] - a friend that I met on the old PCB fandom wiki prior to it's shutdown, he's cool, and your ideological beliefs are alright.
 * [[File:Rayz.png]] Rayz9989 [[File:Caress.png]] - Pretty friendly guy, although his ideology is pretty iffy.
 * [[File:MATTball.png]] Matteel - good ideology even if you're an anti conservative and anti-nationalist, a fellow autist, gamer, and hater of SJWs as well.
 * [[File:Balodismaxesmall.png]] IvarsBalodis [[File:Balodismconsmall.png]] - Fellow old leftist, you have a based ideology

Friendly

 * [[File:Kimiia.png]] Kimiia6 - even if we haven't talked a lot ,you are pretty kindhearted ,it's been a while that you've been gone ,pls come back ,do you know the miraheze wiki links I sent you?
 * [[File:Kranoicon.png]] Sr Deyvid - Cringish Ideology, but you are nice, I remember you back from the old PCB fandom wiki.
 * [[File:Islamic Marxism.png]] Bman - Relations have yet to develop, but you seem based ideologically, and your personality is nice on my impression
 * [[File:Mebrouk.png]] Mebrouk [[File:Mebrouk-2.png]] - kinda based ideologically, but maybe a bit too progressive, you seem nice despite the lack of dialogue between each other.
 * [[File:ChiroPro icon.png]] ChiroPro - Decent ideology ,but we don't talk a lot though ,SJWs are indeed Ubercringe and we both agree so thats based.
 * [[File:Skyrum536.png]] Skyrum536 - Haven't gotten a lot of interaction yet, but you seem nice, your ideology is based as well.
 * [[File:KaiserKlaus.png]] KaiserKlausMouse - same as the above ,except for him being somewhat ideologically different.
 * [[File:BeryAbLib.png]] BeryAb - Bringe ideology, but you seem nice despite having little interaction.
 * [[File:DualPlay.png]] DualPlay1 [[File:Dualusf.png]] - kinda based ideology, a fellow amogusphile as well.
 * [[File:Neoairisu.png]] SumisuAirisu - Bringe ideologically and we heavily disagree with Kemal, but we hate Erdogay and you are nice(at least to me), but you can be too close minded and you're pretty eccentric when debating.

Neutral/Mixed/IDK

 * [[File:Ukraiana Tiny picture2.png]] Ukraiana - Cringish Ideology, you basically seem like a Russian Metbol, though I'm glad you welcomed me back even if not a lot of dialogue has happened between us really.
 * [[File:JoeyFloppa boo.png]] Joeyfloppa - CRINGE IDEOLOGY ,but he does seem somewhat ok ,though there isn't a lot to talk about.
 * [[File:Conbertf.png]] ResponsibleCitizen - A lot of your takes are pretty shitty ,though you still have a few good ones.
 * [[File:MedDavilanda.png]] Davilanda13 - Reactionary Ancap is gigacringe, but as a person, IDK about you really, but you haven't been unpleasant in terms of behavior, at least to me, so you belong here, a shame you had to be banned.

Kinda Enemies

 * [[File:ReactionaryCentrism6.png]] Bannned - I guess centrist economics and constitutionalism are fine I guess ,but your reactionary stances on culture and ultranationalism are just straight up unsettling ,and what is even more unsettling is that you unironically make those beliefs be a part of your personality. holy shit based gaming
 * [[File:NeoBingo.png]] CarpFam - among the first people I met when I joined the former PCB fandom wiki, bringe Ideology though ,and do you really have to be that damn rude and that damn annoying to others, I want an explanation why.
 * [[File:Orthlen.png]] Comrade Numbers - Look, People hate you not only because you're being a dick to others, but you let your political ideology primarily define your very personality, and besides ,You're too extreme and refuse to understand other people's viewpoints, so yeah, Just listen to my word, it's for the better.
 * [[File:Soul.png]] Only Death May Die -We don't talk a lot with each other ,but from what I've seen you can be act pretty eccentric at times ,also Soulism is cringe.
 * [[File:Hmind.png]] RedTankie [[File:Reddit.png]] - Why are you a gay R*ddit C*mmunist?
 * [[File:Krater.png]] Oiboioi - Cringe Kraterocratic LARPoid, but you're among the least bad LARPers.

Enemies

 * [[File:Neoliberal-icon.png]] ANewDude - an Illiterate neoliberal fuck who is just cringe in many ways, if you want to gloat about the strength's of capitalism and the failures of socialism, why should I honor you? at least you hate PZNCs and Otherkins.
 * [[File:Ingsocf.png]] Plenderplar - A shitty and generic Orwellian LARP isn't funny at all, susdem,in fact ,it's quite the opposite.
 * [[File:Kak-Dunce.png]] Lmaourinefeces - Fucking Vandal ,NOW GET OUT OF THE WIKI OR IT'S THE FUCKING BULLET.
 * [[File:No pfp.png]] Hadarianium - PlenderLARP moment.
 * [[File:Ziotard.png]] Tnh33 - Cringe Ziotard who REEEEEs at anything that doesn't fit and/or goes against his ideology as you are but an idiot who doesn't even know the distinctions of sincere and ironic statements, now leave.
 * [[File:State Libtard.png]] NucleicAcidTrip - Cringe unironic state liberal that also wants the world to suffer
 * [[File:Ottoman.png]] Kemalist Enver Paşa - Ewww, an unironic and unfunny racist Turknat.

Worst Enemies
=Icons I made= ,, , , , , , , , , =Gallery=
 * [[File:Palostius.png]] Palosoytius - Sexist Incel Orwellian LARPer who proves to the world that he's even more cringe than PlenderLARP's Ideology, is basically the most soy person in the wiki ever, expect people to look down on you and throw you to the slums since you don't honor others as well as you're just a fucking LARPer who wants to annoy people by gloating about your absolutely shit takes.
 * [[File:Fandomsoc.png]] Fandom - why. did. you. deny. us. polcompballers. the. moment. to. cherish. 6. MORE. FUCKING. DAYS.

=Comments= 