UserWiki:Matteel

Hello, and welcome to my page! My ideology is Mattism, the ideology of the user Matteel. Mattism is civically liberal, advocates for  semi-direct democracy, is  culturally progressive, economically  center-left, militarily  non-Interventionist,  patriotic,  left-populist, and diplomatically  internationalist.

[[File:Consti.png]] Introduction [[File:Consti.png]]
Matteel has been a lurker on the subreddit ever since 2021 and a user of this wiki since the old one got shut down (I hadn't made an account at the time), and around summer started being active on it. I've contributed to both r/polcompball and to r/polcompballanarchy and I'm flaired as Social Democracy on the offical subreddit. Overall, I am a typical modern American liberal. I believe in progressive social and fiscal policies, and that cultural liberalism is the best way society should be ran. Along with being the best way to combat the regressive moral policies of conservatism, and to weaken its influence. I seek to create an ideology based on the harm principle, based on cultural tolerance and permissiveness. Along with being an internationalist, I'm opposed to isolationism. I seek to co-operate with other countries, while still being a trade protectionist, seeing as the best way to keep American influence and to challenge the economic dominance of authoritarian states in the world. All of this will be expanded upon in greater detail as you read the policies I have on my page.

[[File:Utility.png]] Ethics and Philosophy [[File:Utility.png]]
While morality is subjective and based on emotional arguments that lie on individuals, that doesn't mean that morality shouldn't exist. This is where my ethics come in, which could largely be summed up by utilitarianism. The ethical theory of utilitarianism is a theory by John Stuart Mill, that states that actions should be judged based on how much good or harm an action causes. And as such, actions and policies should be looked and lens that to increase the happiness of individuals and decrease suffering.

[[File:Hedonism.png]] Hedonism [[File:Hedonism.png]]
This is where my hedonism comes in, as there being no objective morality, I should do what makes me the most happiest while I'm still alive on this earth, as it makes no sense for me not to enjoy myself.

[[File:Atheism.png]] Atheism and Naturalism [[File:Atheism.png]]
Largely due to the fact that religion never played any significant role in my life and that I have always been a very materialistic person, It would be basically impossible to convince myself that god or any higher being exists. And as such, I believe materialism and naturalism to be objectively correct and the most accurate way to describe the material conditions of the universe at large. And, for supernaturalism to be objectively wrong. Simply put, there is no god, no ghosts, no spirits, no nothing. I would identify as a positive atheist in this case.

[[File:Humanismpix.png]] Humanism and Absurdism [[File:Absurd.png]]
My humanist ways of thinking can largely come from utilitarianism. That being, people regardless of their background, should be as happy as possible. Believing a society full of injustice is not a very happy society, and should be combatted to reduce the suffering of said individuals within that society. As for absurdism, I believe nihilism to be a very boring way to live your life, while there is very much truth to it, I don't choose to live my life pessimistically.

[[File:Pragmat.png]] Pragmaticism [[File:Pragmat.png]]
The best way to make change is through a pragmatic approach. As, while idealism is to an extent, necessary, you have to do things that go against your own ideas to inspire change. Even if it means compromising on your own ideals, it's better to have some of the change you wanted, compare to having nothing at all. And as such, harm reduction is very much necessary to achieve change.

[[File:Constructivist.png]] Social Constructivism [[File:Constructivist.png]]
Being a social constructivist, I believe societal factors and the upbringing of individuals are important in determining the behavior of said individuals. And, should be used when observing the behavior and nature of society at large.

[[File:Indiv.png]] Individualism and Collectivism [[File:Col.png]]
Although my economic system is obviously collectivist, I'm not against personal culture and still think the individual can do as they please as long as they aren't harming anyone. So, My ideology could be described as a mix between individualism and collectivism, although it does lean on collectivism. But, still retain what I said about personal culture.

Main Influences
Epicurus (341BC-270BC) Franklin D. Roosevelt (1882-1945) Theodore Roosevelt (1858-1919) Al Gore (1948) John Locke (1632-1704) Mikhail Gorbachev (1931) Barack Obama (1961) Edward Snowden (1983) Julian Assange (1971) Huey Long (1893-1935) Alexei Navalny (1976) Sviatlana Tsikhanouskaya (1982) Roman Albertovich Abalin (1998) Joseph Stiglitz (1943) George Orwell (1903-1950) Martin Luther King Jr. (1929-1968) John Stuart Mill (1806-1873) Joseph Lancaster (?) John Maynard Keynes (1883-1946) Greg Guevara (1997) Bernie Sanders (1941) Ian Kochinski (1994) Petter Vallentyne (1952) Jeremy Corbyn (1949) Elizabeth Warren (1949) Hillel Steiner (1942) Rick Falkvinge (1972) June Nicole Lapine (1991) Joshua Wong (1996) Agnes Chow (1996) Nathan Law (1993)

[[File:Consti.png]] Personality [[File:Consti.png]]
He's pretty passive and docile most of the time (even if you are a massive piece of shit in terms of personality, it's not worth to waste energy on), not liking to get into meaningless internet drama. As, that doesn't contribute to anything productive. Along with this, he's pretty much to himself, favoring small friend groups that he can easily keep in contact with as that allows him to build better relationships with people. And outside of that, if he isn't playing Hoi4 or some other strategy game, he's probably outside riding his bike or talking with a friend. He does have a notable hawkish attitude towards ideologies that are authoritarian and/or conservative.

[[File:Consti.png]] Some stuff about me [[File:Consti.png]]
I've always liked Geography and History, and strategy games. Although I've never been too good at them, my favorite strategy games of all time are the Sid Meier's civilization series and Hoi4. I've played games like EU4, Stellaris, and others, but none of those have captured my attention was much as Hoi4. One of my all-time favorite games has to be Minecraft, even if I don't play it much anymore, it still holds a very special place in my heart because it's one of the first games I ever touched back in 2012 when I got the demo version (which I still have) on my old device and made my first java account back in early summer of 2013, to which I'm still using today. I have Autism and ADHD and I've always had a special interest in history. I've watched anime before but it's not my primary interest.

Discovering Mapping and Polandball in 2016
It all started back in the summer of 2016, when I was browsing youtube and got recommend a video titled "Alternate future of the world" by a channel called Romanian Mapping, which featured aforementioned balls. This peaked my interest and quickly became one of my interests, which served as my entry to the polandball fandom.

Discovering Hearts of Iron 4
Around in summer 2017 I got recommended a video by a content creator named "ISorrowProductions", which served as my entry to strategy games and Hearts of Iron 4, to which I bought back in November of 2017, and would revitalize my interest in the polandball fandom as those two are deeply connected (obviously).

Loosing Interest in Mapping Content
I stopped watching mapping content back in early 2018 because the content was getting pretty stale, but I still liked Country balls and its fandom, but because of this sudden loss of interest in mapping content, I became less active in watching Polandball related content (although I still liked creators like ISP and Alex The Rambler).

Getting into Polcompball
Around 2020, I recommended a video called "The political compass rap" by a content creator known as "Jreg" (which many of you here most definitely know). This served into my entry into politics and got me really interested in them (although I never liked r/politicalcompassmemes because I saw it as a really politically illiterate subreddit). This served as my entry into the polcompball fandom, I would quietly lurk around the subreddit back in early 2021. I created my new reddit account back in 2021 and started using it mid summer.

[[File:Apolit.png]] Completely politically illiterate Period [[File:Kak.png]] (2003 - 2012)
I knew nothing about politics at this time because I was a child. None of us start political.

[[File:Apolit.png]] Politically illiterate modern liberalism period [[File:Soclib.png]] (2012 - 2020)
It was some time back in 2012 were I even gained a shred of political consciousness, which was somewhat influenced by my parents because I had nothing to base my political views off of due to having no knowledge of politics. Although I remember saying that I would've voted for Barrack Obama during that time. Around 2016 I got recommended an "SJW owned compilation" and for many people this is were their political journey began, for me it didn't influence my opinion at all. It was also during the 2016 presidential election I found myself hating Donald Trump and a lot of his rhetoric, although I remember discovering other politicians and thinking that Bernie Sanders was a pretty good one. So that's the closest thing I had to my political beliefs during this era. I also discovered what Social Democracy was playing strategy games and looked into it and thought it was a good ideology, but didn't subscribe to any political view because I was mostly apolitical at the time.

[[File:Progress.png]] Taking the Breadpill [[File:Socdem.png]] (2020 - 2022)
It was sometime back in mid 2019 that I got recommended a Shoe0nHead Video, which brought me down a breadtube rabbit hole and I discovered creators such as Kraut and Shaun. I began watching these videos and thought that they had a lot of good and agreeable talking points. It was after watching these videos I reconfirmed my beliefs by Endorsing Bernie Sanders as a democratic candidate and self identified as a progressive social democrat, and realized that the democratic party wasn't all that good it was made out to be. I've also just never agreed with conservative talking points so It would've been nearly impossible for me to fall down a conservative rabbit hole. I choose social democracy because it matches my cultural views perfectly. Although I'm gonna be honest, I'm more interested in geopolitics than I am in actual politics, I still (somewhat regularly) keep up with major events so I'm atleast aware of what's currently going on.

[[File:Georgist.png]] Landlords begone! [[File:Socgeo.png]] (2022 - 2022 May)
It was sometime around May of 2022 that I realized that the collective ownership of land and a land value tax actually complimented social democracy quite well. And reading some of the ideas of Henry George, I became convinced that landlords were worthless parasites, which is where my modern beliefs come from.

[[File:Transh.png]] Embracing technological development [[File:Ectrans.png]] (2022 - 2022 June)
While not being anti-technological, and even despising those who don't endorse technological development. He realizes that transhumanism has more benefits than drawbacks, and thus, began to endorse increased technological development

My Political Journey
---> --->  --->

My Family
My Families Politics =  Dad 
 * [[File:Soclib.png]] Social Liberalism
 * [[File:ProgressiveChristianity.png]] Progressive Christianity

Mom
 * [[File:Liberalconservative.png]] Liberal Conservatism
 * [[File:Fiscon.png]] Fiscal Conservatism

Sister
 * [[File:Progress.png]] Progressivism
 * [[File:Socliber.png]] Social Libertarianism

Granddad
 * [[File:Xbert.png]] Christian Libertarianism
 * [[File:Libcon.png]] Libertarian Conservatism

Grandma My Family in General =
 * [[File:Moder.png]] Moderatism
 * [[File:Apolit.png]] Apoliticism

[[File:Pat.png]] Dad [[File:Pat.png]]
My dad has always been quite progressive a lot issues and is a democrat voter, although holding a few conservative stances like being pro-life. Along with being quite caring and a hardworking role model, getting me to the state I am into day, to which I will further on all accounts be thankful for. He's been a truck driver for a while now so you can imagine what that is like not being able to see your dad for long periods of time.

[[File:Mat-0.png]] Mom [[File:Mat-0.png]]
My mom is your typical house hold wife, although far from being a typical "trad wife". She works like my dad and has provided for me to get me to the state I am in as well. As for political wise, I'm honestly unsure. Although I know she leans conservative, I've heard her say bad stuff about trump and other republican figures while shitting on democrats as well, but overall, I'm sure she leans more conservative.

[[File:Libfem.png]] My Sister [[File:Libfem.png]]
My younger sister is very progressive on social issues (more progressive than me, and leans on being a stereotypical SJW at times, agreeing with things like hate speech laws and ect). But overall, she means well and we've (for the most part) have always had a good relation with each other. I know her ideology because she took the 9axes quiz and I used the result for it, although she isn't really big onto politics. (if you wanna see the results here they are).

Political Compass Test


Economic Leftism / Economic Rightism (x): -1.88 Social Authoritarian / Social Libertarian (y): -6.67

Test Result: Libertarian Unity

SapplyValues


Equality / Markets (x): -2 Security / Freedom (y): -1.67 Progress/ Tradition (z): 7.19

Test Result: Center-Left

SHODANSapplyValues


Equality / Markets (x): -1 Security / Freedom (y): -1.7 Progress/ Tradition (z): 11.5

Test Result: Center-Left

8Values
Equality 66.0% / 34.0% Markets (Social)

Nationalism 19.4% / 80.6% Globalism (Internationalist)

Liberty 70.7% / 30.3% Authority (Liberal)

Tradition 16.3% / 83.7% Progress (Very Progressive)

Ideology: Social Democracy

NewValues
Equality 61.4% / 38.6% Markets (Social)

Nationalism 27.4% / 72.6% Globalism (Globalist)

Liberty 54.9% / 45.1% Authority (Moderate)

Tradition 22.9% / 77.1% Progress (Very Progressive)

Ideology: Social Democracy

Statecraft Compass
Democracy 75.0% / 25.0% Autocracy

Liberty 61.0% / 39.0% Security

Equality 64.0% / 36.0% Competition

87.0% Progress / 13.0% Tradition

Closest Ideology: Leftism

Furthest Ideology: Fascism

9Axes
Federalism 60% / 40% Unitarism (Moderate Federal)

Democracy 70% / 30% Authority (Democratic)

Globalism 79% / 21% Isolationism (Globalist)

Militarism 25% / 75% Pacifism (Pacifist)

Assimilationist 34% / 66% Multiculturalist (Moderate Multiculturalist)

Security 35% / 65% Liberty (Moderate Freedom)

Equality 64% / 36% Markets (Moderate Equality)

Secular 80% / 20% Religious (Extreme Secular)

Progress 80% / 20% Tradition (Extreme Progressive)

Ideology: Social Democracy

12Axes
Federalism 52.0% / 48.0% Unitarism (Centrist)

Democracy 72.0% / 28.0% Authority (Representative Democracy)

Security 36.0% / 64.0% Liberty (Liberal)

Internationalism 78.0% / 22.0% Nationalism (Internationalism)

Militarism 25.0% / 75.0% Pacifism (Non-Aggressive)

Assimilationism 35.0% / 65.0% Multiculturalist (Polyculturalist)

Collectivize 50.0% / 50.0% Privatize (Mixed Economy)

Planned 68.0% / 32.0% Laissez-Faire (Regulationism)

Protectionism 42.0% / 58.0% Globalism (Moderate)

Irreligious 82.0% / 18.0% Religious (Atheist)

Progress 76.0% / 24.0% Tradition (Culturally Left)

Technology 75.0% / 25.0% Bio-conservative (Technological)

Ideology: Social Liberalism

AmericanValues
Conservatism 21.2% / 79.8% Liberalism (Very Liberal)

Cooperation 67.4% / 32.6% Individualism (Collectivist)

Globalism 62.2% / 37.8% Isolationism (Globalist)

Freedom 55.6% / 44.4% Security (Moderate)

Doctrinial 62.1% / 37.9% Textual (Doctrinal)

Centralism 56.3% / 43.7% State's Rights (Balanced)

Ideology: Progressive Democrat

LeftValues
Revolution 5.9% / 94.1% Reform (Extremely Reformist)

Scientific 43.8% / 56.2% Utopian (Neutral)

Central 46.7% / 53.3% Decentral (Neutral)

International 75.0% / 25.0% National (Internationalist)

Party 92.3% / 7.7% Union (Extremely Partisan)

Production 37.5% / 62.5% Ecology (Ecological)

Conservative 26.5% / 73.5% Progressive (Progressive)

Ideology: Social Democracy

CapValues
Free Market 41.7% / 58.3% Corporatism (Regulationism)

Futurism 70.8% / 29.2% Conservatism (Progressivism)

Autocracy 36.5% / 63.5% Democracy (Representativism)

Authoritarian 44.4% / 55.6% Libertarian (Libertarianism)

Environment 61.1% / 38.9% Productivism (Sustainability)

Land Rights 57.5% / 42.5% Georgism (Property Tax)

Anti-Clerical 80.3% / 19.7% Religious (Atheism)

Globalism 70.8% / 29.2% Nationalism (Internationalism)

Interventionism 40.0% / 60.0% Isolationism (Non-Interventionist)

Accerlation 66.7% / 33.3% Deceleration (Research)

Elitism 29.2% / 70.8% Populism (Popular)

Disunity 75.0% / 25.0% Unity (Enemies)

Ideology: Social Meritocracy

LiberationValues
Moderate 70.9% / 29.1% Radical (Labourism)

Left-Unity 53.6% / 46.3% Lib-Unity (Generalist)

Centralized 53.3% / 46.7% Decentralized (Balanced)

Localist 31.5% / 68.5% Globalist (Internationalist)

Traditionalist 23.7% / 76.3% Progressive (Very Progressive)

Reform 83.3% / 16.7% Revolution (Reformism)

Markets 68.8% / 31.2% Planning (Slightly Unregulated)

Ideology: Social Democracy

EconValues
Equity 62.5% / Competition 37.5% (Redistributed)

Horizontal 60.9% / Hierarchy 39.1% (Levelled)

Demand 60.9% / Regulation 39.1% (Permissive)

Centralized 50.0% / Local 50.0% (Neutral)

Automation 56.3% / Employment 43.7% (Industrialized)

Commons 73.4% / Rent 26.6% (Anti-Rent)

Birth Right 22.9% / Merit 78.1% (Opportunity)

Unionized 75.0% / Divided 25.0% (Pro-Union)

Closest Match: Social Democracy

AuthValues
Oligarchy 95.5% / Autocracy 4.5%  (Bureaucracy)

Capitalist 42.9% / Socialist 57.1% (Mixed Economy)

Elitism 12.5% / Populism 87.5% (Populism)

Prevention 35.7% / Deterrence 64.3% (Discouragement)

Diverse 87.5% / Uniform 12.5% (Polyculturalist)

Irreligion 62.5% / Theocracy 37.5% (Anti-Clericalism)

Best Suited 75.0% / Hereditary 25.0% (Meritocracy)

Auth Disunity 83.3% / 16.7% Auth-Unity (Disunity)

Closest Match: Paternalistic Conservatism

Right Values
Reform 94.4% / 6.6% Conserve (Progressive)

Intervention 65.0% / 35.0% Laisse-Faire (Regulationist)

Authority 35.0% / 65.0% Constitution (Democratic)

Particular 62.5% / 37.5% Universal (Non-Aggressive)

Theocratic 0.0% / 100.0% Separation (Secularism)

Accelerate 70.0% / 30.0% Decelerate (Productivism)

Assimilation 42.5% / 57.5% Multicultural (Neutral)

Ideology: Geolibertarianism

ConservaValues
Moderate 97.1% / 2.9% Radical (Center-Conservative)

Socialist 51.9% / 48.1% Capitalist (Centrist)

Authoritarian 50.4% / 49.6% Libertarian (Balanced)

Nationalist 29.2% / 70.8% Globalist (Diplomatic)

Conventionalist 87.3% / 12.7% Conspiratorialist (Conventionalist)

Ideology: Third Way

8Dreams
Altruity 57.5% / 42.5% Avarice (Realist)

Dominant 33.0% / 67.0% Insular (Ideological Pacificist)

Self 72.8% / 27.2% Totality (Individualist)

Stalwart 10.7% / 89.3% Hedonic (Hedonist)

Ideology: Social Kakistocracy

DozenValues
Equality 56.9% / 43.1% Property (Collective)

Coordination 60.4% / 39.6% Commerce (Regulated)

Dominion 42.4% / 57.6% Anarchy (Dispersed)

Permisison 77.1% / 22.9% Restriction (Tolerant)

Inclusivity 72.9% / 27.1% Supremacy (Respectful)

Heritage 26.4% / 73.6% Novelty (Neoteric)

Ideology:

Next Matches: Social Democracy,  Social Georgism

Worst Matches: Esoteric Fascism,  Jihadism,  Clerical Fascism

Top 10 Closest Matches: Top 10 Furthest Matches:
 * 1) [[File:Paleoliberal.png]]  - 100.00%
 * 2) [[File:Socdem.png]] Social Democracy - 98.60%
 * 3) [[File:Socgeo.png]] Social Georgism - 97.36%
 * 4) [[File:Nordmodel.png]] Nordic Model - 97.08%
 * 5) [[File:E-Democracy.png]] Techno-Populism - 96.60%
 * 6) [[File:Libleft.png]] Left Libertarianism - 96.37%
 * 7) [[File:Radlib.png]] Radical Liberalism - 95.58%
 * 8) [[File:Socliber.png]] Social Libertarianism - 94.93%
 * 9) [[File:Soclib.png]] Social Liberalism - 94.46%
 * 10) [[File:NatProg.png]] Bull Moose Progressivism - 94.24%
 * 1) [[File:Esofash.png]] Esoteric Fascism - 0.00%
 * 2) [[File:Jihad.png]] Jihadism - 0.00%
 * 3) [[File:Cfash.png]] Clerical Fascism - 0.00%
 * 4) [[File:Polpot.png]] Pol Potism 0.01%
 * 5) [[File:Nazcap-Hat.png]] National Capitalism - 0.05%
 * 6) [[File:Odal.png]] Odalism - 0.15%
 * 7) [[File:Nazi.png]] National Socialism - 0.18%
 * 8) [[File:Hoppef.png]] Hoppeanism - 0.20%
 * 9) [[File:Reactlib-icon.png]] Reactionary Libertarianism - 0.22%
 * 10) [[File:Moncap.png]] Monarcho-Capitalism - 0.28%

6Foundations
Care - [23/30] 76.7%

Fairness - [23/30] 76.7%

Loyalty - [9/30] 30.0%

Authority - [16/30] 53.3%

Sanctity - [12/30] 30.0%

Liberty - [18/30] 60.0%

Estimated Ideology: Social Democracy

PolcompballValues
Sincerity 65.0% / Irony 35.0% (Rational)

Jannyphobe 61.4% / Jannyphile 38.6% (Populist)

Veteran 35.4% / Newbie 64.6% (Apprentice)

Wholesome 71.4% / Edgy 28.6% (Goodwilling)

Horny 87.5% / Anti Horny 13.5% (Decadent)

Active 34.5% / Lurker 65.5% (Sometimes)

Standard 50.0% / Wacky 50.0% (Political)

Boring 33.3% / Schizo 66.7% (Neurotic)

Liked 66.1% / Disliked 33.9% (Appreciated)

Discriminatory 23.4% / Inclusive 76.6% (Accepting)

Behaving 55.8% / Misbehaving 44.2% (Behaved)

DiscriminatoryValues
White 42.5% / Black 57.5% (Racial Egalitarianism)

Matriarchy 55.0% / Patriarchy 45.0% (Feminism)

Jeunism 35.0% / Adultism 65.0% (Moderate Adultism)

Hetero 41.3% / Homo 58.7% (Sexual Orientation Equality)

Cis 41.3% / Trans 58.7% (Transgender Equality)

Malthusocracy 60.0% / Lipostrocracy 40.0% (Body Type Equality)

CulturalValues Test
Monoethnic 13.1% / 86.9% Multiethnic (Ethnic Abolitionist)

Monocultural 31.7% / 68.3% Multicultural (Slightly Multicultural)

Favoritism 4.6% / 95.4% Equality (Absolute Equality)

Tolerance 79.8% / 20.2% Separation (Tolerant)

Pro-LGBT 78.7 / 22.3 Anti-LGBT (Pro-LGBT)

Nation 34.5% / 65.5 International (Continental)

Religion 0.0% / 100.0% Secular (French Secularism)

Essentialism 1.1% / 98.9% Constructivism (Extremely Constructivist)

Closest Match: Post-Modernism

Religious Values
Pro-Catholic 20.4% / 79.6 Anti-Catholic (Extremely Anti-Catholic)

Pro-Protestant 34.9% / 66.1% Anti-Protestant (Somewhat Anti-Protestant)

Pro-Orthodox 27.7% / 72.3% Anti-Orthodox (Anti-Orthodox)

Philo-Semitic 46.3% / 53.7% Anti-Semitic (Neutral)

Islamophilic 33.4% / 66.6% Islamophobic (Somewhat Islamophobic)

Pro-Buddhist 25.9% / 74.1% Anti-Buddhist (Anti-Buddhist)

Pro-Hindu 25.7% / 74.3% Anti-Hindu (Anti-Hindu)

Pro-Pagan 23.7% / 76.3% Anti-Pagan (Anti-Pagan)

Satanic 46.0% / 54.0% Divine (Neutral)

Religious 10.0% / 90.0% Atheistic (Fanatically Atheistic)

Closest Match: Secular Atheist

Dichotomy Philosophy
Materialism 76.7% / 23.3% Spiritualism

Egoism 51.5% / 48.5% Altruism

Idealism 41.4% / 58.6% Pragmatism

Hedonism 76.8% / 16.1% Asceticism

Nihilism 82.5% / 17.5% Moralism

Rationalism 60.3% / 39.7% Romanticism

Skepticism 87.5% / 12.5% Absolutism

Closeted Match:

Dichotomy Political Philosophy
Overall Left 74.8% / 25.2% Overall Right

Naturalist 94.9% / 5.1% Transcendental

Deconstructive 70.9% / 29.1% Traditional

Equality 55.9% / 44.1% Hierarchy

Liberation 73.1% / 26.9% Control

Closeted Match: Critical Thinker,  Socialist

CN Values
Equality 63% / 37% Market (Equality Bias)

Freedom 67% / 33% Authority (Freedom Bias)

Progress 80% / 20% Tradition (Progress)

Ecology 55% / 45% Production (Neutral)

Closeted Match: Social Democracy

Follow Ups: Industrial Party,  Feminism,  Complete Westernization,  Pirate Party

Sex Values
Masculine 0.0% / 100.0% Feminine (Feminine)

Hyper 78.1% / Hypo 21.9% (High)

Dominant 58.3% / 41.7% Submissive (Switch)

Deviant 31.3% / 68.7% Pure (Vanilla)

Affection 12.5% / 87.5% Hedonism (Hedonist)

Test Gallery
= My beliefs (NOTE: This is being rewritten, and will be added to overtime progressively) =

[[File:Dem.png]] Overview [[File:Dem.png]]
Mattism is a democratic ideology. Beliving that, democracy has shown itself to be the least worst system, atleast compared to all other forms tried. And, that countries without democracy are bound to fail compared to those with democratic institutions. However, he realizes that democracies can and have unraveled themselves. Which is why he supports protective measures to make sure that doesn't happen. Along with favoring reforms to our current system to make it more democratic, and to fight corruption.

[[File:Liberal_Democracy.png]] Liberal Democracy [[File:Liberal_Democracy.png]]
Mattism prefers a government that is built for the common good for the people, and thus, a a republic. Specifically, a liberal democracy. However, he wants to give the population more say in government, and thinks introducing policies that bring direct democracy into the government are a good idea. And, is supportive of a semi-direct democracy. Seeing it as the ultimate compromise between either a representative democracy, and a  direct democracy. So, Representatives should be largely responsible for governance, while citizens can have more autonomy through popular initiatives and referendums, ect.

[[File:Reform.png]] Civil Service Reform [[File:Reform.png]]
Mattism seeks to abolish the electoral college, seeing it as nothing more than an relic of the past that is barely functioning the modern day, and is disproportionately effecting third parties ability to compete, contributing to the duopoly we have between the two major parties, and the further elitism within these parties. With the ever increasing amount of people being disillusioned by our system, and not identifying with either democrats or republicans, he views this as a system that has to go. His first reform would to replace the electoral college vote with the popular vote. His other reforms would be to abolish the senate, seeing it as nothing more than upholding the elitism within the government, and preventing a lot of necessary reform. Along with a ban on corporate lobbying and gerrymandering. These reforms I would propose would, along with my other reforms, strengthen American democracy, prevent cronyism in our government, and give more people say in the government. As I believe our government shouldn't be for sale by massive corporations, it should be for the people, and make our overall system more meritocratic.

[[File:E-Democracy.png]] Electronic Voting [[File:E-Democracy.png]]
Mattism believes we need to push forwards technology that allow us to vote via things like, a phone, computer, ect. He is a supporter of an electronic democracy in this regard. However, realizing how vulnerable these methods are to outside influence, he opposes implementing these policies until we have the technology necessary to go through with it, but overall, he is supportive of the development of said technology. Voting via other methods will still be available and not be phased out. However, these policies would only be done on a local level, with things like national elections having to be done in-person or by mail.

[[File:Anti-Corrupt.png]] Whistle Blowers [[File:Anti-Corrupt.png]]
Mattism believes that people who expose government corruption shouldn't have to fear persecution, as the government and its institutions have a right to be inclusive and transparent with the population that is being governed. And, that any functioning democracy should work on ridding itself of corrupt officials in office.

[[File:Fed.png]] Federalism [[File:Fed.png]]
In terms of how the bureaucracy is administered, Mattism prefers local governance compared to a  unitary government, mainly due to how ineffective a unitary government would preform in the United States due to its size. Along with the fact that, federalism is inherently more democratic and less wasteful in terms of bureaucracy, the state's governments will know what their citizens know more than what the federal government will. But, states governments have to abide by the national laws, and the constitution.

[[File:DefDem.png]] Defensive Democracy [[File:DefDem.png]]
Mattism believes the government should actively protect its institutions from those who wish to do them harm, as we cannot give them the freedom to tear down our democracy. This would function like a defensive democracy. If your party actively poses a threat to democracy, it shouldn't be included in government. Believing that freedom of assembly and speech has its limits, and where they use their voices to silence the voices of other people is enough to warrant this.

[[File:Intercult.png]] Interculturalism [[File:Intercult.png]]
With how immigrants will be handled, Mattism supports Interculturalism. As he opposes how multicultural societies tend to self-segregate, and how  ethnic centric societies are very bigoted towards outsiders. So, it allows for diversity at the local level, while still allowing for a shared sense of national identity. He is also in favor of liberalizing immigration, as immigrants help contribute to the labor force, in addition to giving illegal immigrants the pathway to citizenship. However, there will be a wait list where the immigrants have to assimilated, and learn our culture and values before they can access any of the government programs, such as the welfare state. He also thinks it helps contribute to maintaining the social democratic state, as seen in the  Nordic countries. However, with less racism. Along with it being less destructive to the progressive movement, as cultures that do not tolerate our values will not peacefully coexist, and will unravel a progressive culture.

[[File:Secular.png]] Secular Governance [[File:Secular.png]]
Mattism is against any religious organization playing a role in government, or the government subsidizing religious organizations through a tax exempt status. Which is why he seeks the complete separation of church and state. He himself is a pretty staunch anti-clericalist, noting the nepotism, elitism, and seeing as how, historically, religious organizations have used their influence to further their own corrupt needs of their clergy men over the people. So, he am vehemently opposed to them having any sort of political sway, and would favor their influence in the public sphere be minimized. Cults will not count as freedom of religion, and if shown to pose a threat to society, will be extensively monitored. Hes opposed to forced secularism, or  religious governance. As well, he thinks that people who deny basic science based on their religious beliefs are very cringe, and only hold society back. And in this regard, he holds distrust of Islam, seeing as many third-world Islamic countries are riddled with  reactionaries  who use religion as a mean to further sentiment their rule. Not to say this doesn't apply to other religions, but, Islam in the modern day holds more relevancy. However, this is not to say I'm against Islam or the people, I still think they should be allowed to follow their beliefs. And is against the talking points of right-wing populists that excessively demonize the people, as a lot of them do nothing wrong.

[[File:Civilib.png]] Civil Liberalism [[File:Civilib.png]]
On the civic axis, Mattism is pro-privacy. Believing the expansion of the surveillance state in the United States hasn't been for the best interest of the people, but for the government to further its control over the general populace. He would enact reforms that weaken the surveillance state so it isn't so invasive into people's daily lives. This would include revoking the patriot act, and getting rid of other unneeded spying programs. As, he believes the government should be big enough to protect the people from harm, and to keep them safe, but also respect the personal privacy of daily citizens lives.

[[File:Socdem.png]] Overview [[File:Socdem.png]]
On economics, Mattism takes inspiration from several ideologies, being: State Capitalism,  Market Socialism,  Social Corporatism,  Social Georgism, and  Keynesianism.

So, overall, he's your pretty average Social Democrat. And, despite being pretty left-wing in his economic beliefs, he is still skeptical of most forms of Socialism, believing that  Capitalism as ultimately shown itself to be the best economic system in most of its forms, with having the longest longevity compared to such economic systems. In spite of this, he believes that numerous regulations are necessary to keep this success, and to make the economy work for everyone.

[[File:Keynes.png]] Fiscal Policy [[File:Keynes.png]]
In terms of macroeconomics, Mattism is self-described as a Keynesian. And as such, he believes that the government should actively take a hand in the market and create fiscal programs that increase spending to boost growth in the economy. Supporting increases of spending during times of crisis's to dampen the damage done during said crisis, to recover the economy.

[[File:Social_corpratism.png]] Mode of Production [[File:Social_corpratism.png]]
Mattism's mode of production would be that of Social Corporatism, he believes that the government should have a large influence in the market through  state owned enterprises in sections of the economy that are naturally monopolistic, such as railways and electric grids, and in parts of the private sector as well, that compete with businesses within the market. And in the labor market, there would be strong unionization of the working class, viewing unions as a favorable means to achieve working rights, along with it being necessary for the  progressive movement to keep political power.

He is also against union busting, believing that it is unconstitutional. Only being allowed when there is legitimate reason to do so, like when the union in question doesn't have the best interest of the workers they are representing. And, he thinks that companies that partake in such practice should be severely punished.

He advocates for class collaboration over  class struggle, seeing as classes do provide a benefit to society. And as such, the state should  to negotiate terms, with the state acting as a mediator between the two.

On the local level, ideally, medium to small-sized enterprises should be ran as worker co-operatives, although, this won't be enforced, but it will be encouraged through things like tax breaks and subsidizes.

[[File:Univhealth.png]] Healthcare [[File:Univhealth.png]]
Mattism is supportive of a, believing that it is detrimental to the nation to have people who cannot afford to pay for healthcare to be indebted just because they cannot pay. But, private healthcare options would still exist, as luxury for those who choose it, with the universal healthcare being the main option.

[[File:Trustbust.png]] Monopoly Busting [[File:Trustbust.png]]
Mattism supports breaking up massive monopolies. As everyone knows, it is not good to have monopolies dominating an economy. In this case, I would support bringing back the strong anti-trust laws that were present during the progressive era of the United States. Along with this, the CEO's of said companies shouldn't be allowed to own any shares in the companies that are broken up

[[File:Bankocracy.png]] Banking [[File:Bankocracy.png]]
Mattism believes in the creation of a strong central bank to regulate the supply of monetary units. However, private banks will still be allowed to exist, given under extensive regulation. And, how the banks and other things related will run will be dependent on the size of said bank.

[[File:Georgist.png]] Housing [[File:Georgist.png]]
On housing, Mattism views housing as a basic human right. And believes that this is were the market fails the most. He wishes to establish a land value tax to replace  property taxes. He supports. However, land value tax cannot be the only tax. As, the tax on its own wouldn't be enough to fund welfare programs. But, the reveune generated from this tax would contribute to the welfare state, making him a Social Georgist.

[[File:Corp.png]] Corporate Welfare [[File:Corp.png]]
Subsidies and corporate welfare can be accurately described as "socialism for the rich, capitalism for the poor", and should end. He is against bailing out firms that are deemed "too big to fail". Seeing it as contributing to crony capitalism, and favoritism within the economy. Were the wealth is being concentrated to the top one percent, with small businesses being left in the dust.

[[File:Regulationism.png]] Taxation [[File:Regulationism.png]]
Mattism favors high amounts of taxation to fund a universal welfare state, and the upkeep in social services for the population. The list of taxes that would be introduced would include:
 * [[File:Georgist.png]] Land value tax (Close to 100%)
 * [[File:EconProg.png]] Wealth and Income tax (Progressive)
 * [[File:Soccap.png]] Value added tax
 * [[File:Envi.png]] Carbon tax
 * [[File:DvCoordination.png]] Payroll tax
 * [[File:Long.png]] Corporate tax (Green technology companies are exempted)
 * [[File:Protect.png]] Import duties
 * [[File:Krit.png]] Sin tax (Although, the former would be low)

[[File:Social-ism.png]] Employment [[File:Social-ism.png]]
Mattism believes that employment should be handled through government programs that help the unemployed find employment in the labor market, through active labor market policies, such as  welfare to work. Ideally, the unemployment rate should be somewhere around 5 - 6%. He also thinks it's wrong to discriminate against people in the work field for things that they have no control over, such as disability, sexual orientation, race, ect. And thinks that, if there are any accommodations that someone should need, then those accommodations should be met.

[[File:EconProg.png]] Minimum Wage [[File:EconProg.png]]
Mattism believes that Minimum Wage should be adjusted for yearly inflation, with wages being different for each job field you want to be employed in. With a base line standard being a wage that allows you provide for yourself at the bare minimum, with states adjusting it to fit the needs of their population retrospectively.

[[File:Progress.png]] Overview [[File:Progress.png]]
Overall, Mattism is a culturally left-wing ideology. He believes that tradition stems from the past, and is not to be held sacred. And thus, favors a culture of permissiveness and  tolerance. He is supportive of Feminism, ,  drug decriminalization,  criminal justice reform,  cultural secularism, ect. His beliefs largely following that of Civil Libertarianism, where individual rights and liberty are respected, and the harm principle is upheld. Believing that, as long as the individual is not harming anyone, then in most instances, they should be allowed to do as they please. Along with this, he takes some influences from, with the skepticism of metanarratives, believing that there is no objective metaphysical narrative for humanity that exists. With culture, he is not seeking cultural collectivism, making him a cultural individualist, however, with notable exceptions. But, for the most part, the person can do whatever they please.

[[File:Gay.png]] LGBT Rights [[File:Gay.png]]
Mattism views the  with sympathy, seeing as they have been historically trampled over, and with no representation in the public sphere. With traditional views of morality further adding the  hostility towards their existence.

He is in favor of complete marriage equality between those of Heterosexuality and  Homosexual couples. Seeing the definition of marriage is between two loving souls, as it wrong to give people who had no control over what they were born with fewer rights.

Additionally, he is in favor of Trans rights, seeing gender dysphoria as a real thing that has been historically unaccounted for due to said views, that historically, has demonized these people. However, he does realize the dangers of putting children on things like hormone therapy, and wants to put restrictions on gender-affirming healthcare to prevent such dangers from happening, these restrictions would make it so that you have to be an adult to go through such. But, the surgeries and things associated with it will be provided for by healthcare givers, seeing it as a form of healthcare.

However, he views the Pride movement as a double edged sword, seeing as it has helped with the destigmatization of these individuals, but seeing it as an extension of  pseudo-progressivism, where  massive corporations use it as an excuse to appeal to  progressive crowd to increase their profit margins. So, he supports the societal acceptance of people within the LGBT community, but views the Pride movement with suspicion, but isn't against it.

[[File:DvPermission.png]] Bodily Autonomy [[File:DvPermission.png]]
Mattism believes that, as long as what you're doing isn't harming anyone, then in most instances, you should be able to do that. With this, he favors the decriminalization of most victimless crimes, believing  that the government has no right to regulate the behavior of people most of the time.

[[File:Fem.png]] Feminism [[File:Fem.png]]
Mattism would self-describe himself as a "male feminist", being sympathetic to the talking points of modern day feminism, while still holding some contempt for the modern day feminist movement. So, he's not against feminism, and even calls himself one, but thinks that some of their points could be adjusted.

He's against traditional gender roles, seeing them as a product of society, and not that of nature. Thinking it's best that women break free the constraints of them, as this would ultimately contribute to a society were women are more free to decide their own paths in life.

With this, he is firmly in the pro-choice camp, believing that the choice ultimately lies with the women. And as such, is for the liberalization of, seeing the label  "pro-life" as inherently untruthful. Seeing as many pro-lifers don't even care about the mothers health, or the welfare of the baby after they are born. And, even defend it in cases of rape or incest, which is just abhorrent in many ways. Along with not being supportive of welfare programs that help mothers, while supporting things like the  death penalty. And, while this isn't the case with all pro-lifers, as they come in many shapes and sizes, he still finds it awful that people defend forcing a mother to give birth. Along with just with that life doesn't start at conception, and is just a bundle of cells, it isn't murder. It's that simple. Seeing as banning abortion doesn't end abortion, but only ends safe abortions, he supports the legalization of first, and second term abortions. With third-term abortions being regulated where the women's life is in danger, rape or incest, ect. As well, he is also for the wide spread availability of contraception, as being pro-choice doesn't mean pro-abortion, he wants comprehensive sex education to reduce the amount of abortions. He prefers abortions to be safe, legal, and rare. And, despite being mentally disabled himself, doesn't care about the pre-natal screening of babies to detect genetic disabilities, thinking that the mother should have full consciousness.

However, he is against affirmative action, seeing it as the employers decision to hire based on  merit, instead of things like gender or race.

[[File:GRights.png]] Gun Rights [[File:GRights.png]]
Mattism believes that people should be allowed to own guns, given they have no criminal back round. But, with this, there should be numerous regulations in place to keep bad actors from easily attaining guns, which is what could be seen for the extensive gun violence problem this country faces. And, while not wanting to outright ban weapons that are deemed "for war", he wants extensive regulations on them, seeing as the majority of people will never own these types of fire arms, but still believing that people who want to own them and can actually afford them should be allowed to own them.

[[File:Scientocracy_Small.png]] Education [[File:Scientocracy_Small.png]]
Mattism believes our education system is in desperate need of reform. And, that education should be free from K-12, with college tuition being free as well, seeing tuition fees as stupid. A long with how things are taught, he is in favor of impartially, as things like History shouldn't be taught through a nationalistic lens. Along with teaching politics to our children to avoid the current gerontocracy our government is, but should be done in a neutral way that encourages students to pick their own beliefs.

In terms of schooling, he believes that there should be a mix of private and public schools, but private schools should hardly be funded, with most attention going to meeting the upkeep of private schools. Along with this, religious schools can still exist, given that's freedom of religion. But, there will be no tax exemptions or vouchers for them.

[[File:Autism.png]] Disability Rights [[File:Autism.png]]
Being on the spectrum himself, he's greatly sympathetic towards those with disabilities. Seeing as, their chance to live a meaningful life gets drastically reduced, along with the quality of living. With this, he would propose more funding towards social programs that help those in need, for things like schools, nursing homes, expanding accessibility in things like the job market, ect. As, while, he is obviously better off than a lot of people within this group, and is pretty capable of providing for himself, he still recognizes that there are many who less fortunate than him, and thinks its unfair for them to be at the bottom and vulnerable of society.

[[File:Youth.png]] Youth Rights [[File:Youth.png]]
Mattism thinks its wrong to deny the rights of people based on their age, seeing the current system as too strict, and is supportive of youth rights. He believes that the voting age for local issues should be lowered to 16, with things like the presidency staying at 18. Along with more inclusion in things like the workplace, where there is a notable preference towards older people compared to younger people.

[[File:Racenat.png]] Race [[File:Racenat.png]]
Mattism believes that race or  ethnicity are irrelevant, and shouldn't sure in any factor towards things like immigration. However, he does realize that having a colorblind approach does ignore some issues, like with police brutality. But, he does think that people should be judged based on the content of their character, and not on things like race or nationality.

[[File:FDF-Pirate.png]] Copyright & Internet Reform [[File:FDF-Pirate.png]]
Mattism has views how large companies are abusing their power to infinitely extend copyright, so their intellectual property stops from going into public sphere, as unacceptable. Along with how giant tech companies mass farm users internet data just to increase their already massive profit margins, which creates many issues in of itself, and just the fact that it is unethical to do that. He is supportive of pirate politics. Seeing them as, monopolistic, greedy, and corrupt.

[[File:Egirl.png]] Pornography and Prostitution [[File:Egirl.png]]
Mattism believes that Pornography constitutes freedom of speech and expression, and should be allowed for those who are legally old enough to view it. On Prostitution, he believes it's the women's choice to sell her body or not. As long as it's done consensually, then it's perfectly fine, and should be legalized. Seeing as the anti-porn movement is based off of fearmongering lies, he thinks it is retarded, even more so than prohibition, and unpractical to propose any sort of censorship on this media. As, it will always exist whether you like it or not, and banning it will contribute to black market crime related to it, and will only push it underground. As, this can be seen many times throughout history, such as the drug war, or prohibition.

[[File:Civlibert.png]] Euthanasia [[File:Civlibert.png]]
Mattism supports the legalization of euthanasia, believing that if a mentally ill person chooses to voluntary end their own life, then that is their choice and their choice alone, and for it to be immoral & inhumane to let someone who is suffering when they choose to end their own life to let them continue living.

[[File:Klep.png]] Criminal Justice Reform [[File:Klep.png]]
Mattism believes that systemic racism is still well alive and present within the American justice system, despite how long we've come since Jim crow laws. And, as such, is a supporter of criminal justice reform. On cops, he believes that police unions should still exist, but with their negotiating powers restricted. Along with redirecting some of the funds to social programs, but, opposing abolishing or defunding them.

On prisoners and prisons, he opposes capital punishment, and believes that it should be outlawed in all the states. On how prisons treat their prisoners, he believes that justice should focus on rehabilitative justice. With prisoners being allowed to vote once they've finished their prison sentence and have payed the price for their crimes. However, he realizes that some crimes are too bad to forgive. In this case, he would support punitive justice, but with the chance of parole.

[[File:Transh.png]] Technology [[File:Transh.png]]
He would consider himself a moderate transhumanist, and is supportive of  Democratic Transhumanism. Believing that, technological development is almost always for the betterment of society. And, thus, is largely supportive of technological development. Such as developing green technology, pushing for  electronic voting, and the betterment of  womens rights, ect. And, seeing technology as a good way towards liberation for those with disabilities as well. But, he does see the good and bad of job automation, as job automation has pushed millions of jobs that nobody wants to work as largely irrelevant, but also pushes out highly skilled job workers in the workforce, along with having the largest impact on low skill job workers. With this, he believes that automation should be used, but the money used from it should go to the welfare state to fund social programs.

[[File:Covidism-icon.png]] Vaccine Mandates [[File:Covidism-icon.png]]
Mattism believes that mandating vaccinations is necessary for the eradication of diseases. And, is both pro-vaccination and pro-mandate, but not on the same level as some countries like China. But, he views lockdowns as unfavorable, as they cause economic slowdown. With that, they should only be used during the start of a pandemic, with anything further from that being a betrayal of the vaccinated people.

[[File:FreeSpeak.png]] Freedom of Speech [[File:FreeSpeak.png]]
Mattism supports, seeing it as necessary for a country to keep the market place of ideas running. However, there will be notable restrictions on freedom of speech, such as things like defamation, hate groups, and protecting the public welfare of citizens. So, overall, he thinks freedom of speech should be near absolute, but not absolute. Seeing as a society were all ideas are tolerated would be a society that would eat itself alive, and would fall to the minority of intolerant people who would seek to undue those liberties that allow people to express themselves. He is against hate speech laws, seeing them are inherently coercive to civil liberties, and not actually protecting the people said laws seek to protect the people that they are aimed towards. He does, however, hold a couple of exemptions with this view. Like in Germany for example, where it is a crime to deny  the holocaust, given the context of what happened in that region and where it happened, that should indefinitely stay a crime. But, he dislikes how the governments where laws like these are implemented go overboard with these laws as well, so he would loosen up those laws so they're not as strict. But, not eliminating them.

[[File:Mediastocracy_flair.png]] News and Media [[File:Mediastocracy_flair.png]]
Mattism believes that mainstream media is a decisive tool that has allowed for corporate money to stay on top, with the population being ever so clueless about alternative options, or the way they are being manipluated. Despite this, he thinks bringing back the Fairness Doctrine wouldn't do a whole lot to counteract this problem, mainly due to it being in a time period where it could actually be enforced. A better solution would to directly break up the hegemony of corporate media.

[[File:Laicism.png]] Cultural Secularism [[File:Laicism.png]]
Mattism largely views the decline of spirituality and religion in western society as an overall net-positive development for society, as it contributes to  secularism. And as such, he thinks that society should be based on secular values and ethics. Although, nothing that forces secularization, just based on developing the material needs of people to the point were, religious influence declines in the public sphere, with a following rise of secularism to follow up with it. As, this can be seen in many developed western countries.

[[File:7AA75006-F094-416A-8824-CCA033321FA3.png]] Drugs [[File:7AA75006-F094-416A-8824-CCA033321FA3.png]]
Mattism believes that drug war was unilateral disaster, that put many innocent lives in jail, and only contributed to the prison industrial complex. And, he supports the, with soft drugs being completely legalized. Seeing as the "law" cannot even be enforced properly, it being a law in the first place is quite useless.

[[File:World.png]] Overview [[File:World.png]]
Mattism, despite his left populist influences, isn't  Anti-American like how would you expect some of them to be. In fact, despite of what he thinks of the elites, the government, and ect. He sees that the West is the lesser evil between the major world powers, as the powers of the West uphold his views more than compared to those of the East. So, he is supportive of a policy of atlanticism. Because, he would prefer to live under Western hegemony compared to the hegemony of other world powers, seeing them as being, more often than not, authoritarian, oppressive, and conservative.

He is an  in terms of diplomacy. Believing that international co-operation is most often than not, at the benefit of the country, and a downright necessity for the progression of humanity. In this regard, he is staunchly opposed to isolationism. But, he isn't against nationalism, seeing as nationalism doesn't have be a disunifying thing for humanity, and can actually be useful in uniting humanity, this is what I would call human nationalism. Along with supporting pan-nationalism, seeing as countries that have similar culture ties have the most to gain, although without abolishing borders. Despite this, he has a rather protectionist view of trade, seeing as how modern world powers have used trade as a means to in debt countries, seeing it as  neo-imperialism. And, as such, he is supportive of Alter-Globalization. In terms of the military, he is a, believing that a policy of pacifism as a major power would be Disastrous, and thinks that the military influence of the United States should be kept, albeit in a limited form.

In terms of independence movements, he would consider himself an independence ally, and is sympathetic to people being oppressed under colonialism. This is where his Anti-Colonial stances come from, thinking that people fighting oppression in authoritive regimes should have the right to self-determination. However, he views independence movenets in countries that aren't fighting against authoritarianism with suspicion.

[[File:Atlanticism.png]] Atlanticism [[File:Atlanticism.png]]
Looking at the current state of geopolitics, Mattism believes that the the west is the lesser evil between the two, with the East being filled with brutal dictators that do not respect human rights, political rights, or progressive values. With the West respecting these values more, he is in favor of United States hegemony on the global stage. Believing that the hegemony of western powers has done more to develop the world, ensure  peace, and contribute to  progressive values.

[[File:Globnat.png]] Trade [[File:Globnat.png]]
Mattism believes that countries should trade with each other when it benefits them, seeing trade as one of the driving forces in the growth of an economy, and excessive  protectionist polices a determinant to that. Where goods that cannot be easily produced in said country could be brought to the country through trade. However, he opposes free trade. Seeing as, it has allowed the outsourcing of American jobs to poor countries, increased the profit margins of massive corporations without benefiting the people at all, and has, overall, contributed to the corporatocratic state we are currently living in. So, he is vehemently against outsourcing our jobs to countries like China, or countries were the working conditions are poorer of that of the host country. And, is in favor of leaving free trade agreements like NATFA. So, he would call himself a fair-trade protectionist, believing that trade agreements should be at the best interests of both countries. With this, he favors low tariffs, and liberalized trade with countries with good relations of the United States. So, trading with authoritarian regimes like China is bad, but trade with  American allies is good. And, should be used to challenge the economic domination of said authoritarian states.

[[File:Cball-China.png]] China [[File:Cball-China.png]]
Mattism cannot in any good faith recognize or support the current government of China, a government that is  commiting the biggest human rights abuse since the holocaust, has an  social credit system, is a  one party state, has  no respect for human rights or civil liberties, and is  totalitarian. With all of this in mind, and a lot more, he thinks it's the best interest of the West to contain the influence of the CCP, and their evil practices from spreading. As, the Chinese government has shown to not care for the welfare of its people, and has proven the world time and time again that it is the biggest threat to world peace, it should have its power undermined at any given opportunity. And as such, he is a staunch supporter of Taiwanese independence on the international stage, along with giving his unconditional support towards the  Milk Tea Alliance, and the  Hong Kong Protesters.

[[File:Cball-Russia.png]] Russia [[File:Cball-Russia.png]]
Mattism believes that Russia's territorial expansions should, in absolutely zero way, be recognized. And, that all the lands stolen should be given back to their neighbors. And, he condemns the invasion of Ukraine, believing that this war should blow up in  United Russia's face hard. As, the West should have zero toleration for such territorial ambitions. Although, the current government of Ukraine is by no means perfect, but seeing it as the lesser evil towards  Russia, and would favor  Ukrainian admission into both  NATO and the  European Union. Along with this, Putin's puppet leaders, like  Lukashenko, should be internationally condemned.

[[File:Human.png]] Foreign Aid [[File:Human.png]]
Mattism views foreign aid as a double edged sword. On one hand, when use rightly, it can actually helped underdeveloped countries in need and prevent the deaths of thousands of people through humanitarian aid. But, on the other, it can be used by corrupt officials to further their own wealth, while leaving very little of the population it was intended to be given too. But, in spite of all of this, he still has a rather favorable view of foreign aid, seeing as the United States has helped prevent the deaths of millions of people through its foreign aid programs, he is very much in favor of increasing the amount of foreign aid given to countries. Seeing it as a tool that can be used to further positive relations with the US on the global, and for peaceful diplomacy.

[[File:Cball-EU.png]] European Union [[File:Cball-EU.png]]
Mattism supports the European Union as an idea, seeing how it has brought Europe closer together, has been a force for good for the  progressive movement, and has brought peace and prosperity to Europe. However, he does oppose the austerity measures in the union, seeing as it's increasing to the wealth inequality within Europe, and along with some of its institutions. So, he would be a  in this regard, and more open to reforming the institutions he takes issue with than outright abolishing it. He opposes the idea of a untied europe, seeing as it is largely impratical, and would either become undemocratic, or fall apart entirely due the massive amounts of disagreements within and between European governments. And, with this, he is supportive of the European Union in sanctioning authoritative governments that are faltering on having democracy like  Poland.

[[File:Cball-UN.png]] United Nations [[File:Cball-UN.png]]
Mattism believes that the United Nations doesn't really do a whole lot, but sees the organization as a useful tool for peaceful diplomacy. And, as such, is supportive of the United States to remain within the  United Nations. But, he would reform the institutions of the United Nations to be more democratic, and to make governments actually accountable on the world stage. Seeing as, international law is something that doesn't exist and is largely made up by big powers, but still wanting international law, seeing as it could get us closer to world peace.

[[File:Necon.png]] NATO [[File:Necon.png]]
Mattism holds a rather favorable view of NATO as an alliance, thinking that progressives who oppose it are misinformed, as it has also been a force for good for the  progressive movement. Along with NATO being necessary for the defense of Europe. But, with this in mind, he doesn't like some aspects of the alliance. That mainly being, the alliance not requiring its members to maintain its democratic status, the unncessary interventions, and it being too centric on the United States. He would've been in favor of abolishing the alliance for a collective security council, but seeing the way things are recently going with current events, the alliance has shown to still have a purpose, and he will still continue to support its existence against chinazis and  putinists, ect.

[[File:Zio.png]] Israel and Palestine [[File:Cball-Palestine.png]]
Mattism believes that Israel or  Palestine is none of our business, and we should drop our international support for either of the sides, as he is pretty against using tax payer dollars to fund Israel. Along with this, he is against Zionism as an ideology, seeing its brutality towards the Arabs, he doesn't like Israel as a state, but isn't opposed to Israel as a state existing. But, that doesn't mean he likes Palestine either, as Hamas is a terrorist organization, and is no better than the Israeli government in terms of brutality. Ideally, both governments should collapse, and in its place, a one state solution that includes both Arabs and Israelis, based on secular governance. However, realizing how idealistic that is, the next best option would for both sides to drop their extremists, and tone down the ethnic centric nationalism to  civic nationalism, and peacefully co-exist.

Ranking Political Quadrants
A B C D F
 * [[File:Centrist-yellow.png]] Centrism - Nice and moderate, like all should be 😎
 * [[File:Libunity-yellow.png]] Libertarian Unity - Definitely the best Compass unity, libertarianism with centrist economics is based. (I also enjoy not cucking myself to the state as well, how could you tell?)
 * [[File:Leftunity.png]] Leftist Unity - While I do admire your passion for equality, and don't think socialism was a failure all times it was practiced, I would still prefer to live under capitalism.
 * [[File:Libleft.png]] Libertarian Left - You are objectively better than Authoritarian left and most of your followers are culturally-left, but that's really the only reason why you don't get ranked lower.
 * [[File:Rightunity-yellow.png]] Rightist Unity - Thinks capitalism will just magically solve everything, the invisible hand of the free market isn't real. Although I would prefer to live under this preferred to a command economy, also your followers are really a mixed bag as well, your culturally left-wing ones are TOLERABLE, your culturally right-wing ones are the worst.
 * [[File:Libright-yellow.png]] Libertarian Right - Suffers from much as the same issues as Rightist Unity except a lot of y'all are culturally right-wing, which unlike LibLeft, most people are culturally left-wing which it is only saving grace.
 * [[File:Authleft.png]] Authoritarian Left - Tankies are some of the most pretentious people I've seen in political discourse, "oH i BeLiEvE iN CoMmUnIsM NoW I wIlL SiMp FoR ChInA" please fuck yourself.
 * [[File:Authright.png]] Authoritarian Right - Authoritarian AND Capitalist? Yeah I think I wanna vomit.
 * [[File:Authunity.png]] Authoritarian Unity - Your centrist economics hardly make up for your genocide. Also a lot of your followers are just larpers, tell me a country that has successfully adopted fascism please, then I'll listen (not really, because fascism is fucking stupid and so are all of its followers).

[[File:Dem.png]] My ideal political party [[File:Dem.png]]
Name: Progressive's of America Progressive Caucus (Main) Socialist Caucus Modern Liberal Caucus Liberty Caucus
 * [[File:Socdem.png]] Social Democracy
 * [[File:Socgeo.png]] Social Georgism
 * [[File:Leftpop-0.png]] Left-Wing Populism
 * [[File:Progress.png]] Progressivism
 * [[File:Globnat.png]] Alter-Globalization
 * [[File:Envi.png]] Environmentalism
 * [[File:Marketsoc.png]] Market Socialism
 * [[File:Liberalsoc.png]] Liberal Socialism
 * [[File:Dsa.png]] Democratic Socialism
 * [[File:Leftpop-0.png]] Left-Wing Populism
 * [[File:Socgeo.png]] Social Georgism
 * [[File:Ecosoc.png]] Eco-Socialism
 * [[File:Soclib.png]] Social Liberalism
 * [[File:Soccap.png]] Social Capitalism
 * [[File:Neotech.png]] Technoliberalism
 * [[File:Glib.png]] Green Liberalism
 * [[File:Pop.png]] Populism
 * [[File:Reform.png]] Reformism
 * [[File:LibSocDemIcon.png]] Libertarian Social Democracy
 * [[File:Socliber.png]] Social Libertarianism
 * [[File:Civlibert.png]] Civil Libertarianism
 * [[File:Thar.png]] Anti-Authoritarianism
 * [[File:Leftpop-0.png]] Left-Wing Populism
 * [[File:Envi.png]] Environmentalism

[[File:Dem.png]]The political parties in elections [[File:Dem.png]]
Conservative Democratic Party (Alignment: Center Authoritarian Right) '''Party Summary: The conservative democratic party is your typical center-right conservative party. It's moderately conservative on social issues while being fiscally conservative. On foreign issues, it would be diplomatically internationalist, on trade and alliances.''' Modern Liberal Party (Alignment: Center) '''Party Summary: The Modern Liberal Party is your typical centrist liberal party. It's moderately progressive on social issues, and fiscally progressive, being a welfarist ideology. On foreign issues, it is diplomatically internationalist, on trade and alliances.''' Libertarian Party (Alignment: Libertarian Right) '''Party Summary: The Libertarian Party is a party that focuses on free-market capitalism. It's a pretty standard libertarian right party, but with a notable faction of socially liberal libertarians.''' Green Party (Alignment: Left Unity) '''Party Summary: The Green Party is a green party based on eco-socialism, and the idea that socialist reforms are needed prevent ecological disaster from happening. It is culturally progressive and supports international co-operation and environmental globalization to help solve climate change.''' Distributist Party (Alignment: Center Authoritarian) '''Party Summary: The Distributist Party is based on the catholic social teaching of distributism, although being officially secular in its party platform. It is a culturally centrist party.''' Pirate Party (Alignment: Center) '''Party Summary: The Pirate Party is based on reforming copyright law, and other laws towards intellectual property. It advocates for direct democracy, with a push towards electronic voting. On economics, it is syncretic, being made up of both fiscally progressive and fiscally conservative people.''' Transhumanism Party (Alignment: Center) '''Party Summary: The Transhumanist Party advocates for accelerated technological growth and increased spending around technological fields to achieve transhumanism. It advocates for direct technocratic democracy, ecological technological development, and is economically centrist, being a welfare capitalist party.  Cultural Heritage Party''' (Alignment:  Authoritarian Unity) '''Party Summary: The Cultural Heritage Party is a party founded on conserving the heritage of the Untied States. It is Culturally conservative, isolationist, and fiscally progressive on economics.''' Taxpayers Party of America (Alignment: Authoritarian Right) '''Party Summary: The Taxpayers Party is a party founded on Christian values, and free market capitalism. It is culturally conservative, and fiscally conservative.''' Communist Party USA (Alignment: Authoritarian Left) Party Summary: The Communist Party USA is a party founded on Marxist-Leninism, and the belief that abolishment of capitalism and markets is needed to liberate the working class, it is socially progressive and economically far-left. American Union of Fascists (Alignment: Authoritarian Unity) (Banned) '''Party Summary: The American Union of Fascists advocates for the overthrow of American democracy for a totalitarian fascist dictatorship. It has no power in any elections because it is banned from participating in government. But, it does have a small but active following.'''
 * [[File:Eccon.png]] Eco-Conservatism
 * [[File:Liberalconservative.png]] Liberal Conservatism
 * [[File:Civnat.png]] Civic Nationalism
 * [[File:Intercult.png]] Interculturalism
 * [[File:Internation.png]] Internationalism
 * [[File:Fiscon.png]] Fiscal Conservatism
 * [[File:Soclib.png]] Social Liberalism
 * [[File:3way.png]] Third Way
 * [[File:Civlibert.png]] Civil Libertarianism
 * [[File:Glib.png]] Green Liberalism
 * [[File:Internation.png]] Internationalism
 * [[File:Libfem.png]] Liberal Feminism
 * [[File:Libertarian.png]] Libertarianism
 * [[File:Civlibert.png]] Civil Libertarianism
 * [[File:Glibr.png]] Green Libertarianism
 * [[File:Bhl.png]] Bleeding-Heart Libertarianism
 * [[File:Liberaltarianism.png]] Liberaltarianism
 * [[File:Libertfem.png]] Libertarian Feminism
 * [[File:Ecosoc.png]] Eco-Socialism
 * [[File:Prog-u.png]] Progressivism
 * [[File:Lpop.png]] Left-Wing Populism
 * [[File:Dsa.png]] Democratic Socialism
 * [[File:GeoSynd.png]] Geosyndicalism
 * [[File:Marketsoc.png]] Market Socialism
 * [[File:SocDist.png]] Secular Social Distributism
 * [[File:Social_corpratism.png]] Social Corporatism
 * [[File:Envi.png]] Environmentalism
 * [[File:Progconf.png]] Progressive Conservatism
 * [[File:Socgeo.png]] Social Georgism
 * [[File:Soccap.png]] Social Capitalism
 * [[File:FDF-Pirate.png]] Piratism
 * [[File:Synclib.png]] Syncretic Liberalism
 * [[File:Civlibert.png]] Civil Libertarianism
 * [[File:Directdem.png]] Direct Democracy
 * [[File:E-Democracy.png]] E-Democracy
 * [[File:Prog-u.png]] Progressivism
 * [[File:Transh.png]] Transhumanism
 * [[File:Post-Industrialism.png]] Post-Industrialism
 * [[File:Demtrans.png]] Democratic Transhumanism
 * [[File:Ectrans.png]] Eco-Transhumanism
 * [[File:Cyberfem.png]] CyberFeminism
 * [[File:Neotech.png]] Technoliberalism
 * [[File:Natcon.png]] National Conservatism
 * [[File:Cultural_Nationalism.png]] Cultural Nationalism
 * [[File:Rpop-tinfoilhat.png]] Right-Wing Populism
 * [[File:Protect.png]] Protectionism
 * [[File:Cdem.png]] Christian Democracy
 * [[File:Onenatcon.png]] One-Nation Conservatism
 * [[File:Plcn2.png]] Paleoconservatism
 * [[File:Natcon.png]] National Conservatism
 * [[File:ChristNat.png]] Christian Nationalism
 * [[File:Rpop-tinfoilhat.png]] Right-Wing Populism
 * [[File:Isolationist.png]] Isolationism
 * [[File:Fiscon.png]] Fiscal Conservatism
 * [[File:ML.png]] Marxism–Leninism
 * [[File:Ecosoc.png]] Eco-Socialism
 * [[File:Prog-u.png]] Progressivism
 * [[File:Lpop.png]] Left-Wing Populism
 * [[File:Globnat.png]] Alter-Globalization
 * [[File:Marxfem.png]] Marxist Feminism
 * [[File:Fash.png]] Fascism
 * [[File:Corptism.png]] Corporatism
 * [[File:SL.png]] Silver Legionism
 * [[File:Altr.png]] Alt-Right
 * [[File:WelfChauvin.png]] Welfare Chauvinism
 * [[File:Ecofash.png]] Eco-Fascism

[[File:Dem.png]] Elections overview [[File:Dem.png]]
Because my country would have a significant socially liberal influence, culturally conservative parties would have more difficulty getting into power. How the votes would be distributed would look something like this for example out of 140,878,906 votes. This is how the popular vote for the 2020 election of my country would look like. The 3 largest parties would be 1. Progressives of America 2. Modern Liberal Party 3. Conservative Democratic Party.
 * [[File:Socdem.png]] Progressives of America: 50,078,276
 * [[File:Soclib.png]] Modern Liberal Party: 39,394,685
 * [[File:Conservative.png]] Conservative Democratic Party: 38,687,294 
 * [[File:Ecosoc.png]] Green Party: 4,857,432
 * [[File:Libertarian.png]] Libertarian Party: 2,718,495 
 * [[File:Distributist.png]] Distributist Party: 2,075,482
 * [[File:Cultural_Nationalism.png]] Cultural Heritage Party: 1,272,912
 * [[File:Plcn2.png]] Taxpayers Party of America: 674,704
 * [[File:Transh.png]] Transhumanism Party: 481,630
 * [[File:FDF-Pirate.png]] Pirate Party: 418,453 
 * [[File:ML.png]] Communist Party USA: 219,543

Favorite quotes
“Anyone can deal with victory. Only the mighty can bear defeat.” - Adolf Hitler

“In twelve years from now, you will not recognize Berlin.” - Adolf Hitler

"Give me 10 years, and you will not recognize Germany." - Adolf Hitler

"All you have to do is kick in the door and the whole rotten structure will crumble to the ground." - Adolf Hitler

“the harder the conflict, the greater the triumph.” - George Washington

“Being all equal and independent, no one ought to harm another in his life, health, liberty, or possessions.” - John Locke

"The love for all living creatures is the most noble attribute of man." - Charles Darwin

“Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the universe.” - Albert Einstein

“Nationalism is an infantile thing. It is the measles of mankind.” - Albert Einstein

“Peace cannot be kept by force, it can only be achieved by understanding.” - Albert Einstein

“If a free society cannot help the many who are poor, it cannot save the few who are rich." - John Kennedy

“Mankind must put an end to war - or war will put an end to mankind." -  John Kennedy

“If by a "Liberal" they mean someone who looks ahead and not behind, someone who welcomes new ideas without rigid reactions, someone who cares about the welfare of the people-their health, their housing, their schools, their jobs, their civil rights and their civil liberties-someone who believes we can break through the stalemate and suspicions that grip us in our policies abroad, if that is what they mean by a "Liberal", then I'm proud to say I'm a "Liberal.” -  John Kennedy

"People hate politicians. And I can understand why." - Alexei Navalny

“In Russia an authoritarian leader is running the country. You can’t fight Putin with elections because he controls them. That’s why demonstrations are the most effective approach. Unfortunately Russia has sunk to this primitive level.” - Alexei Navalny

“I think very poorly of United Russia. United Russia is the party of corruption, the party of crooks and thieves. And it is the duty of every patriot and citizen of our country to make sure that this party is destroyed.” - Alexei Navalny

“I really hate the people in power. I hate them with every fiber of my being. That is what drives me in almost everything I do.” - Alexei Navalny

"A nation should not be a hostage to one man's thirst for power, and it won't. Belarusians have woken up. The point of no return has passed." - Sviatlana Tsikhanouskaya

"I am not in politics for power. I am in it for justice." - Sviatlana Tsikhanouskaya

"The world will not accept dictatorship or domination." - Mikhail Gorbachev

“Peace is not unity in similarity but unity in diversity, in the comparison and conciliation of differences.” - Mikhail Gorbachev

"I'm for the poor man - all poor men, black and white, they all gotta have a chance. They gotta have a home, a job, and a decent education for their children. 'Every man a king' - that's my slogan." - Huey Long

"Sure we'll have Fascism here, but it will come as an anti-Fascism movement." - Huey Long

“Capitalism is the astounding belief that the most wickedest of men will do the most wickedest of things for the greatest good of everyone.” - John Maynard Keynes

"Although it is not true that all conservatives are stupid people, it is true that most stupid people are conservative." - John Stuart Mill

"All silencing of discussion is an assumption of infallibility." - John Stuart Mill

"Whatever crushes individuality is despotism." - John Stuart Mill

“America will never be destroyed from the outside. If we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves.” - Abraham Lincoln

“Those who deny freedom to others, deserve it not for themselves” -  Abraham Lincoln

"I'm not an egirl, okay? I am a grown ass E-WOMAN." - June Nicole Lapine

“As President Franklin Delano Roosevelt reminded us: “The test of our progress is not whether we add more to the abundance of those who have much, it is whether we provide enough for those who have little.” - Bernie Sanders

“We are living in a nation which worships wealth rather than caring for the poor. I don’t think that is the nation we should be living in.” - Bernie Sanders

“We don't want to see our kids and grandchildren be the first generation in the modern history of America to have a lower standard of living than their parents.” - Bernie Sanders

“If a financial institution is too big to fail, it is too big to exist.” - Bernie Sanders

"All tyrannies rule through fraud and force, but once the fraud is exposed they must rely exclusively on force." - George Orwell

"However much you deny the truth, the truth goes on existing." - George Orwell

“When one thinks of all the people who support or have supported Fascism, one stands amazed at their diversity. What a crew! Think of a programme which at any rate for a while could bring Hitler, Petain, Montagu Norman, Pavelitch, William Randolph Hearst, Streicher, Buchman, Ezra Pound, Juan March, Cocteau, Thyssen, Father Coughlin, the Mufti of Jerusalem, Arnold Lunn, Antonescu, Spengler, Beverley Nichols, Lady Houston, and Marinetti all into the same boat! But the clue is really very simple. They are all people with something to lose, or people who long for a hierarchical society and dread the prospect of a world of free and equal human beings. Behind all the ballyhoo that is talked about ‘godless’ Russia and the ‘materialism’ of the working class lies the simple intention of those with money or privileges to cling to them. Ditto, though it contains a partial truth, with all the talk about the worthlessness of social reconstruction not accompanied by a ‘change of heart’. The pious ones, from the Pope to the yogis of California, are great on the’ change of heart’, much more reassuring from their point of view than a change in the economic system.” - George Orwell

“The only thing we have to fear is fear itself.” - Franklin Roosevelt

“The liberty of a democracy is not safe if the people tolerated the growth of private power to a point where it becomes stronger than the democratic state itself. That in its essence is fascism: ownership of government by an individual, by a group, or any controlling private power.” - Franklin Roosevelt

“Democracy cannot succeed unless those who express their choice are prepared to choose wisely. The real safeguard of democracy, therefore, is education.” - Franklin Roosevelt

“Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere.” - Martin Luther King Jr.

“We must live together as brothers or perish together as fools.” - Martin Luther King Jr.

“I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin but by the content of their character.” - Martin Luther King Jr.

"Ultimately, saying that you don't care about privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different from saying you don't care about freedom of speech because you have nothing to say." - Edward Snowden

“These programs were never about terrorism: they're about economic spying, social control, and diplomatic manipulation. They're about power.” - Edward Snowden

“Under observation, we act less free, which means we effectively are less free.” - Edward Snowden

"We want Hongkongers to decide the future of Hong Kong." - Joshua Wong

"We long to have a home where civil freedoms are respected, where our children will not be subject to mass surveillance, abuse of human rights, political censorship and mass incarceration." - Joshua Wong

User Relationship Quiz
Updated Relationship Quiz =

Relationship Quiz
I'm updating this quiz to give more accurate test results, You'll be prompted to agree with the following statements, which ones you agree with determine how much basedpoints you'll gain. In general, if you agree with me, you'll gain based points, if you disagree, you'll loose based points.

Economics
 * I support a mixed market economy (or neocorporatism) +5 [[File:Basedism.png]] Based Points


 * I support a social market economy/market socialism +3 [[File:Basedism.png]] Based Points


 * I support a form of moderate socialism that isn't market socialism +2 [[File:Basedism.png]] Based Points

Freedom of Speech
 * I support a free market economy without a welfare state, or a command economy +0 [[File:Basedism.png]] Based Points
 * I'm a near free speech absolutist and oppose most hate speech laws/laws on promiscuity (Ex: porn) and recognize that the benefits of free discussion outweigh all disadvantages +5 [[File:Basedism.png]] Based Points


 * I do support free speech, but agree with hate speech laws. But not laws limiting promiscuity +3 [[File:Basedism.png]] Based Points


 * I support free speech, but I want laws limiting promiscuity and/or hate speech +2 [[File:Basedism.png]] Based Points

Separation of Church and State
 * Free speech isn't necessary for a society to function +0 [[File:Basedism.png]] Based Points
 * I support Anglo-American style secularization and the right to freedom of religion +5 [[File:Basedism.png]] Based Points


 * I support laicism/French secularism +3 [[File:Basedism.png]] Based Points


 * I support confessionalism +1 [[File:Basedism.png]] Based Points


 * I support a theocracy, or state atheism +0 [[File:Basedism.png]] Based Points

Military Policy
 * Military budget should should make up 2% to 5% of the GDP and should be cut to reduce wasteful spending or remain the same (given were you live, this in the context of the US), along with a non-interventionist policy +5 [[File:Basedism.png]] Based Points


 * We need a strong military, but with a non-interventionist policy +2 [[File:Basedism.png]] Based Points


 * We need a strong military, with an interventionist policy +0 [[File:Basedism.png]] Based Points

Geopolitical Policy
 * I'm an internationalist, globalist, ect, and support military alliances and/or regional unions like the European Union +5 [[File:Basedism.png]] Based Points


 * I want to put my nation's interests above all else, but I'm not against the idea of international co-operation +2 [[File:Basedism.png]] Based Points


 * I support an isolationist policy and believe we shouldn't be involving ourselves in international unions +0 [[File:Basedism.png]] Based Points

Civic Policy
 * I'm civically liberal/libertarian and realize that the state should be big enough to protect the citizens while still valuing the right to privacy, and being against mass surveillance +5 [[File:Basedism.png]] Based Points


 * I'm civically statist and value security over privacy, but oppose authoritarianism/or minarchist +3 [[File:Basedism.png]] Based Points


 * I'm civically authoritarian, but oppose tyrannical rule and totalitarianism +2 [[File:Basedism.png]] Based Points

Government
 * I'm civically authoritarian/totalitarian and believe that the right to privacy shouldn't exist/I support anarchism +0 [[File:Basedism.png]] Based Points
 * I support Democracy +5 [[File:Basedism.png]] Based Points


 * I'm an authoritarian democrat +1 [[File:Basedism.png]] Based Points


 * Democracy and due process is entirely unnecessary +0 [[File:Basedism.png]] Based Points

Cultural Policy
 * I am culturally progressive/anti-conservative, and realize that traditions are of no real meaning on their own. +5 [[File:Basedism.png]] Based Points


 * I'm culturally center-left +3 [[File:Basedism.png]] Based Points


 * I'm culturally center-right/right +1 [[File:Basedism.png]] Based Points


 * I'm culturally far-right/reactionary +0 [[File:Basedism.png]] Based Points

Individual Policy
 * I'm a civil libertarian and believe that society should be based on the harm principle, and as long as what you're doing isn't illegal then you should be allowed to do it. +5 [[File:Basedism.png]] Based Points


 * I support individual liberty, but there are some things that the individual shouldn't be able to do +3 [[File:Basedism.png]] Based Points


 * The individual should have very little freedom +1 [[File:Basedism.png]] Based Points

Environmental Policy
 * The person's responsibility is to serve the state above all else. Nothing within the state, nothing outside the state, nothing against the state +0 [[File:Basedism.png]] Based Points
 * Global warming is real and we should seek to change our carbon foot-print now while we still have the chance to +5 [[File:Basedism.png]] Based Points


 * I support environmental regulations, but think It's not a big deal for the time being +3 [[File:Basedism.png]] Based Points


 * Global warming doesn't exist/I don't support preservation of the environment +0 [[File:Basedism.png]] Based Points

User Quiz Test Results Legacy Relationship Quiz =
 * - 50/50 (How it should be formatted)
 * - 45/50
 * - 31/50
 * [[File:Statlibertarian.png]] SuddenWriter - 28/50
 * - 43/50
 * - 14/50
 * - 29/50
 * - 47/50
 * S1984.png:Savvas1984- 29/50
 * - 11/50
 * [[File:YellingLiber.png]] Yelling Yowie - 43/50
 * - 20/50
 * - 43/50
 * - 34/50
 * - 30/50

Legacy Relationship Quiz
'''As being human, you start of 0 Based Points. Then, agree or disagree with the 10 statements. Agreeing to one (1) of them gets gain of one of your Based Points. Somewhat agreeing or disagreeing with one of them gets you a gain of zero point five (0,5) of your Based Points, while disagreeing entirely gets you zero (0)  Based points. At the end, see how much Based Points are left, and you got your basedness score out of 10. Don't forget to post in comment section what results you got! '''

	1.I'm a progressive and oppose conservatism and/or traditionalism.

	2.I support the state intervening in the economy and expanding the welfare state.

	3.I'm a secularist/support separation of church and state and oppose both state atheism and theocracies.

	4.I'm against discrimination of people for their race, religion, sexual orientation, disability, or background, and oppose taking away the rights of these people.

	5.I'm against nationalism.

	6.I'm a globalist or internationalist and support a peaceful diplomatic approach to geopolitics.

	7.I oppose authoritarianism, censorship, and tyrannical dictatorships.

	8.I oppose anarchism or extreme libertarianism, the state is necessary but should focus on protecting our civil liberties while keeping us safe.

	9.I support democracy, civil liberties, and free will as long as you're not harming others

	10.I support environmentalism and preservation of the environment and think that global warming is real.

My quiz test results:
 * - 3/10
 * [[File:Amm1.png]] Am m - 8.5/10
 * [[File:CEgo.png]] - 6/10
 * - 8/10
 * - 7.5/10
 * - 5.5/10
 * - 1/10
 * [[File:Councilguy2.png]] Councilguy - 6/10
 * - 6/10
 * - 5.5/10
 * [[File:No_pfp.png]] TheGuyThatHarassedYouOnYouTube - 8.5/10
 * - 5/10
 * - 9/10
 * - 9/10
 * - 3.5/10
 * - 8/10
 * [[File:YellingLiber.png]] Yelling Yowie - 9/10

How I would've voted in elections
American Elections =

1700s
1789 - George Washington

1792 - Thomas Jefferson

1796 - Thomas Jefferson

1800s
1800 - Thomas Jefferson

1804 - Thomas Jefferson

1808 - James Madison

1812 - James Madison

1816 - James Monroe

1820 - James Monroe

1824 - Andrew Jackson

1828 - Andrew Jackson

1832 - Andrew Jackson

1836 - Martin Van Buren

1840 - Martin Van Buren

1844 - James K. Polk

1848 -  Martin Van Buren

1852 - John P. Hale

1856 - John C. Frémont

1860 - Abraham Lincoln

1864 - Abraham Lincoln

1868 - Ulysses S. Grant

1872 - Horace Greeley

1876 - Rutherford B. Hayes

1880 - James A. Garfield

1884 - James G. Blaine

1888 - Benjamin Harrison

1892 - James B. Weaver

1896 - William McKinley

1900s
1900 - Theodore Roosevelt

1904 - Theodore Roosevelt

1908 - William Howard Taft

1912 - William Howard Taft

1916 - Charles Evans Hughes

1920 - James M. Cox

1924 - Calvin Coolidge

1928 - Herbert Hoover

1932 - Herbert Hoover

1936 - Franklin D. Roosevelt

1940 - Franklin D. Roosevelt

1944 - Franklin D. Roosevelt

1948 - Harry Truman

1952 - Adlai Stevenson

1956 - Adlai Stevenson

1960 - John F. Kennedy

1964 - Lyndon B. Johnson

1968 - Hubert Humphrey

1972 - George McGovern

1976 - Jimmy Carter

1980 - Jimmy Carter

1984 - Walter Mondale

1988 - Michael Dukakis

1992 - Bill Clinton

1996 - Bill Clinton

2000s
2000: Al Gore

2004: John Kerry

2008: Barrack Obama

2012: Barrack Obama

2016: Bernie Sanders (No one)

2020: Bernie Sanders ( Joe Biden) German Elections =

1800s
1871 - - LGGWA 1874 - - SAPD 1877 - - SAPD 1878 - - SAPD 1881 - - SAPD 1884 - - SAPD 1887 - - SAPD 1890 - - SPD 1893 - - SPD 1898 - - SPD

1900s
1901 - - SPD 1907 - - SPD 1912 - - SPD 1919 - - SDP 1920 - - SDP 1924 (May) - - SDP 1924 (December) - -  SDP 1928 - - SPD 1930 - - SPD 1932 (July) - - SPD 1932 (November) - - SPD 1933 (March) - - SPD 1947 - - SPD 1953 - - SPD 1957 - - SPD 1961 - - SPD 1965 - - SPD 1969 - - SPD 1972 - - SPD 1976 - - SPD 1980 - - SPD 1983 - - SPD 1987 - - SPD 1990 - - SPD 1994 - - SPD 1998 - - SPD

2000s
2002 - - SPD 2005 - - SPD 2007 - - SPD 2009 - - SPD 2013 - - SPD 2017 - - SPD 2021 - - SPD

Things I like
My favorite youtube channels =

[[File:YouTube.png]] Political Youtube channels [[File:YouTube.png]]

 * [[File:Soc-h.png]] Shaun


 * [[File:Socdem.png]] Shoe0nHead


 * [[File:Kraut.png]] Kraut


 * [[File:Thar.png]] Three Arrows


 * [[File:Fem.png]] Knowing Better


 * [[File:Antcent.png]] JrEg


 * [[File:World.png]] CaspianReport

[[File:YouTube.png]] Non-political Youtube channels [[File:YouTube.png]]

 * [[File:CGP_Grey.png]] CGP Grey


 * [[File:Eastoryball.png]] Eastory


 * [[File:CodyFrank.png]] AlternateHistoryHub


 * [[File:ArmchairHistoryBall.png]] The Armchair Historian


 * [[File:Cball-Russia.png]] NFKRZ


 * [[File:ISPball.png]] iSorrowproductions


 * [[File:Gamer.png]] Mountain General


 * [[File:Gamer.png]] Alex The Rambler!


 * [[File:Histval.png]] History Matters


 * [[File:Cball-Austria.png]] Tapakapa

Favorite Hoi4 Mods =
 * [[File:Histval.png]] Countryballs Explained

Favorite Hoi4 Mods

 * [[File:World.png]] Toolpack


 * [[File:Burgsys_icon.png]] The New Order: Last Days of Europe


 * [[File:Necon.png]] Cold War Iron Curtain: A World Divided


 * [[File:Avant-garde.png]] Red Flood


 * [[File:World.png]] Random Country Placement


 * [[File:World.png]] Novum Vexillum


 * [[File:Cball-GermanEmpire.png]] Kaiserredux


 * [[File:World.png]] Player-Led Peace Conferences


 * [[File:Nazi.png]] Thousand Week Reich

Political Parties & Countries
Parties I would vote for =

[[File:Cball-US.png]] United States
Democratic Party
 * [[File:Socdem.png]] Left-Wing Faction

[[File:Cball-Germany.png]] Germany
SPD

[[File:Polandball.png]] Poland
Lewica

[[File:Cball-Hungary.png]] Hungary
Magyar Szocialista Párt

[[File:Cball-France.png]] France
Parti socialiste

[[File:Cball-Japan.png]] Japan
Constitutional Democratic Party of Japan
 * [[File:Socdem.png]] Social Democratic Party

[[File:Cball-Sweden.png]] Sweden
Sveriges Socialdemokratiska Arbetareparti

[[File:Cball-Taiwan.png]] Republic of China
Pan-Green Coalition
 * [[File:People's_Power_(TW).png]] New Power Party
 * [[File:Socdem.png]] Social Democratic Party

[[File:Cball-UK.png]] United Kingdom
Labour Party
 * [[File:Socdem.png]] Soft Left

[[File:Cball-Kazakhstan.png]] Kazakhstan
Democratic Choice of Kazakhstan

[[File:Cball-Norway.png]] Norway
Arbeidarpartiet

[[File:Cball-Finland.png]] Finland
Suomen sosialidemokraattinen puolue

[[File:Cball-North_Korea.png]] North Korea
Free Joseon

[[File:Castro.png]] Cuba
Social Democratic Co-ordination of Cuba

[[File:Cball-South_Korea.png]] South Korea
Justice Party

[[File:Cball-HongKong.png]] Hong Kong
Pro-Democracy Camp
 * [[File:Socdem.png]] League of Social Democrats

[[File:Cball-China.png]] People's Republic of China
Democracy Party of China

[[File:Cball-Canada.png]] Canada
New Democratic Party

[[File:Cball-Russia.png]] Russia
Russia of the Future

[[File:Cball-Belarus.png]] Belarus
Anti-Lukashenko Parties Opinions on Political Parties =
 * [[File:Socdem.png]] Belarusian Social Democratic Party

[[File:Cball-US.png]] United States

 * [[File:Demcr.png]] Democratic Party - Just because you are the lesser evil, doesn't make you a good party. The only things that's worth a damn is the progressive wing.


 * [[File:RepubUS.png]] Republican Party - Eat shit. Your party doesn't conserve anything.


 * [[File:USASolidarity.png]] American Solidarity Party - Sigh. So good, yet so bad. Drop your social conservatism and you would be good.


 * [[File:Rockwell.png]] American Nazi Party - Just a bunch of edgy larpers hanging onto pseudoscience nonsense. It's actually quite sad.


 * [[File:Fuente.png]] America First - Nick Fuentes is a neo-nazi. What do you realistically expect me to say about this party?


 * [[File:USLibertarians.png]] Libertarian Party - You would single-handedly destroy the US economy if you ever got into power.


 * [[File:USA_PirateParty.png]] United States Pirate Party - Holy mother of based. It's hard to reach this level of chad.


 * [[File:ForwardParty.png]] American Forward Party - Has some agreeable ideas like on government, but UBI has to be the dumbest thing I've ever heard of.


 * [[File:Constitution_Party_(US).png]] Constitution Party - Everything I am opposed to can be found within this party, pretty cringe and soy.


 * [[File:GreensUS.png]] Green Party USA - While I do find some agreeability here, I'm not sure how eco-marxism is going to save the environment.


 * [[File:Dsa.png]] Democratic Socialists of America - Ditto above, goes too far imo. Yeah the problems with free-market capitalism are very clear, but I'm not sure how transitioning to a socialist economy is going to help us either.


 * [[File:USA_PSL.png]] Party for Socialism and Liberation - Yeah, no. Capitalism is actually good.


 * [[File:CPUSA.png]] Communist Party USA - Good luck trying to win any election, because it's definitely not happening.

[[File:Cball-Canada.png]] Canada

 * [[File:NDP_icon.png]] New Democratic Party - BAAAAAAAASED! A party that actually cares about the people!


 * [[File:TrudeauLib.png]] Liberal Party of Canada - You're what I immediately think of when I think of what "Canada" is as a country. Not the best, but could be worse. Better than the conservative party.


 * [[File:CanadaConservative.png]] Conservative Party of Canada - Good fucking luck having success in Canada, lmao.


 * [[File:Blanchet.png]] Bloc Québécois - Economics are based, but Quebec separatism? Why though.

[[File:Cball-Germany.png]] Germany

 * [[File:GerSPD.png]] SPD - Finally, the CDU's reign comes to an end. But, like seriously, I wish these parties weren't infested with so many closeted neoliberals.


 * [[File:CDU_Party.png]] CDU - You may have done some good for the german economy over our rule, but merkel was just an overall bad president for germany.


 * [[File:LINKE.png]] Die Linke - Goes too far, I just want restrained capitalism. Not the complete abolition of it. And some of your policies as well are cringe.


 * [[File:Alternative_for_germany_ball.png]] AfD - Where do I honestly start with you? Climate denialism, borderline fascism, hard euroscepticism and nationalism. Your party is a threat to German democracy and European Unity. Your demands are so insane, you will have no hope of ever winning an election, and that's a good thing!

[[File:Cball-UK.png]] United Kingdom

 * [[File:UKLab.png]] Labour Party - I HATE BLAIRITES I HATE BLAIRITES I HATE BLAIRITES. FUCK YOU FOR MAKING MODERN SOCIAL DEMOCRACY LOOK LIKE A JOKE! But the soft-left is cool though.


 * [[File:Con-t.png]] Conservative Party - Boris Johnson is a fucking twat who doesn't know what he's doing. You're going to be begging to rejoin the EU in the future after you've successfully destroyed your economy.


 * [[File:Demlib.png]] Liberal Democrats - Not a bad ideology, but you're never winning an election.


 * [[File:BritUltranat.png]] Britain First - The least racist British party. But seriously, fascism moment. british union of gamers

[[File:Cball-Russia.png]] Russia

 * [[File:Putin.png]] United Russia - You are the bane of that is suffering and pain within Europe. The day your kleptocratic dictatorship gets overthrown is the day Europe can truly live in peace. Literally just eastern neo-conservatism.


 * [[File:RussiaOfTheFuture.png]] Russia of the Future - Anti-Putin, Anti-Corruption, Pro-EU, and progressive. Mostly based, but drop some of the stuff you advocate for please. I'll take this party over the current ruling party of Russia any day of the week.


 * [[File:Zhir.png]] Liberal Democratic Party of Russia - Not a liberal party, at all. Just another Russia United puppet party. Literally backs all of their actions while hardly providing any resistance to what they do.


 * [[File:Nazbol.png]] The Other Russia of E. V. Limonov - Unironic nazbol and neo-nazi group absolutely gaming tho


 * [[File:Euras.png]] Eurasia Party - Pathetic group of larpers, like, what the fuck is this whole Pan-Nationalist Eurasian thing anyways?

[[File:Cball-China.png]] People's Republic of China

 * [[File:ChinaCP.png]] Chinese Communist Party - The day were we see all the party members of the CCP tried for their crimes against humanity is the day the world can finally be at peace. It's even funnier considering the CCP is inspiring their own demise economically as well, quite poetic.


 * [[File:Liberal_Democracy.png]] Democracy Party of China - Tiananmen Square protesters by all accounts were national heroes who fought for freedom and democracy in China and the corruption of the Chinese government, may we never forget them.

[[File:Castro.png]] Cuba

 * [[File:Castro.png]] Communist Party of Cuba - While I may support ending the blockade, the day you get overthrown is the day the Cuban people can celebrate a free and democratic Cuba. Fuck Castro, and fuck his government.


 * [[File:Socdem.png]] Social Democratic Co-ordination of Cuba - Ideally, the party that should take place of the CPC when in the event the Communist Party of Cuba collapses.


 * [[File:Cdem.png]] Patriotic Union of Cuba - I will whole heartedly support you against the Cuban regime.

[[File:Cball-Belarus.png]] Belarus

 * [[File:BelayaRus.png]] Belaya Rus - Critical support to those who opposite this party, one day shall your tyrannical reign come to an end.


 * [[File:Zhir.png]] Liberal Democratic Party of Belarus - Neither liberal or democratic. Just another bootlicker party.


 * [[File:Socdem.png]] Belarusian Social Democratic Party - Down with the Lukashenko regime! Based!

[[File:Cball-Hungary.png]] Hungary

 * [[File:FIDESZ.png]] FIDESZ - You are destroying the little democracy Hungary has, hopefully the European Union puts a stop to your nonsense.


 * [[File:MSZP.png]] Magyar Szocialista Párt - Pure, unadulterated, BASEDNESS! You'd be the best case scenario if FIDESZ was overthrown.


 * [[File:MMM.png]] Mindenki Magyarországa Mozgalom - A conservative party, but given the state Hungary is currently in, almost anything would be better than the current ruling party. Atleast your Pro-EU.

[[File:Cball-Kazakhstan.png]] Kazakhstan

 * [[File:NurOtan.png]] Amanat - Your political party would be out of government by now if you weren't supported by the Russian government. Critical support for any party that is against you.


 * [[File:Liberal_Democracy.png]] Democratic Choice of Kazakhstan - Anti-Corruption, Pro-Democracy, Pro-West, BASED, BASED, BASED!!!!! Down with the current Kazakhstani government!

[[File:Polandball.png]] Poland

 * [[File:PiS.png]] PiS - Your attacks on Polish democracy, authoritarianism, and corruption, are all MEGA cringe. European Union should stop whatever the hell your doing, you directly threaten polish democracy and European Unity.


 * [[File:Lewica.png]] Lewica - Social democracy, pro-EU, secularism, progressive social policies, and environmentalism are all UBER based! Poland would be a much better country if you were in-charge.


 * [[File:Ipl.png]] Polish Initiative - Based progressive social democrat party. One of the only parties in the opposition coalition to Law and Justice that's really worth anything.


 * [[File:KO.png]] Civic Coalition - While opposing the current polish government is based, a lot of this party is cringe. Although that doesn't mean much given the current state Poland is in right now.


 * [[File:Korwinism-Pikselart.png]] KORWiN - This is what pure retardedness as a political party looks like.

Countries in need of change =
 * [[File:PolFal.png]] National Radical Movement - Fashoid party. Bruh moment.

Based countries, little to no changes necessary

 * [[File:Cball-Denmark.png]] Denmark
 * [[File:Cball-Sweden.png]] Sweden
 * [[File:Cball-Norway.png]] Norway
 * [[File:Cball-Iceland.png]] Iceland
 * [[File:Cball-Finland.png]] Finland
 * [[File:Cball-Switzerland.png]] Switzerland
 * [[File:Cball-Austria.png]] Austria
 * [[File:Cball-Germany.png]] Germany
 * [[File:Cball-Netherlands.png]] Netherlands
 * [[File:Cball-Canada.png]] Canada
 * [[File:Cball-Belgium.png]] Belgium
 * [[File:Cball-Czechia.png]] Czechia
 * [[File:Cball-Ireland.png]] Ireland

Good, in need of a few tweaks

 * [[File:Cball-Newz.png]] New Zealand
 * [[File:Cball-Uruguay.png]] Uruguay
 * [[File:Cball-Australia.png]] Australia
 * [[File:Cball-France.png]] France
 * [[File:Cball-Spain.png]] Spain

Ok, but in need of reform

 * [[File:Cball-US.png]] United States
 * [[File:Cball-Chile.png]] Chile
 * [[File:Cball-UK.png]] United Kingdom
 * [[File:Cball-Taiwan.png]] Taiwan

Meh, in need of noticeable reform

 * [[File:Cball-Japan.png]] Japan
 * [[File:Cball-South_Korea.png]] South Korea
 * [[File:Cball-Ukraine.png]] Ukraine

Bad, in need of a peaceful revolution or massive reform

 * [[File:Cball-Poland.png]] Poland
 * [[File:Cball-Hungary.png]] Hungary
 * [[File:Cball-Italy.png]] Italy
 * [[File:Cball-Singapore.png]] Singapore
 * [[File:Cball-Brazil.png]] Brazil

Terrible, burn the entire system to the ground and start from new

 * [[File:Cball-Russia.png]] Russia
 * [[File:Cball-North_Korea.png]] North Korea
 * [[File:Zio.png]] Israel
 * [[File:Cball-Palestine.png]] Palestine
 * [[File:Cball-Iran.png]] Iran
 * [[File:Cball-Belarus.png]] Belarus
 * [[File:Cball-China.png]] People's Republic of China
 * [[File:Cball-Taliban.png]] Afghanistan
 * [[File:Castro.png]] Cuba
 * [[File:Cball-Saudi.png]] Saudi Arabia
 * [[File:Chavismo.png]] Venezuela
 * [[File:Cball-Kazakhstan.png]] Kazakhstan
 * [[File:Cball-AfricanUnion.png]] A lot of Africa
 * [[File:Thailand.png]] Thailand
 * [[File:Cball-Turkmenistan.png]] Turkmenistan
 * [[File:Cball-Ethiopia.png]] Ethiopia
 * [[File:Cball-Somalia.png]] Somalia
 * [[File:Cball-Egypt.png]] Egypt
 * [[File:Cball-Myanmar.png]] Myammar

How to Draw
MyFlagUpdatedMatt.png
 * 1) Draw a ball.
 * 2) Fill the backround with blue.
 * 3) Draw a red cross with white outlines.
 * 4) Draw a red circle in the middle.
 * 5) Draw a rose in the middle of the red circle.
 * 6) Draw the eyes.

You're done!

Ideological Relations
Ideological Relations=

Friends

 * [[File:Socdem.png]] Social Democracy - My ideology, fairly self explanatory, yeah?


 * [[File:LibSocDemIcon.png]] Libertarian Social Democracy - My more focused on civil liberties self. While I do admire your passion for freedom, there needs to be a sensible amount of freedom, still based non-the-less.


 * [[File:Civlibert.png]] Civil Libertarianism - The right to privacy, speech, and bodily autonomy are all important values for society. Without you, society would be nothing.


 * [[File:Progress.png]] Progressivism - Based, nuff said.


 * [[File:Patern.png]] - It should be the job of the state to guide the people, and to provide for them.


 * [[File:Nordmodel.png]] Nordic Model - Based and nordicpilled. You got me into politics, so thanks for that. (Would be better if you dropped the monarchism though)


 * [[File:Hedonism-cloud.png]] Mh:polcompballanarchy:Hedonism - Live life how you want to live it, regardless of moral traditions. Which on their own, are meaningless.


 * [[File:Liberal_Democracy.png]] Liberal Democracy - Not bad in theory, but gets corrupted by corporate interest and cronyism. There's a lot of improvements we can make to this.


 * [[File:Atlanticism.png]] Atlanticism - It makes no objective sense to side with any other side than the west in the current state of affairs.


 * [[File:Pac.png]] Mh:polcompballanarchy:Pacifism - No more shall we waste billions of dollars in pointless interventions.


 * [[File:Socgeo.png]] Social Georgism - Collective ownership of land is very based.


 * [[File:Fem.png]] Feminism & [[File:Menslib.png]] Men's Liberation - Gender equality is based! But modern-day feminism in the first world is meh.


 * [[File:Thar.png]] Anti-Authoritarianism - I enjoy liberty, freedom, and democracy. How could you tell?


 * [[File:Humanismpix.png]] Humanism - You carry my ideas nicely.


 * [[File:Protect.png]] Protectionism - Outsourcing all of our jobs to developing countries has been disastrous on the US economy.


 * [[File:Globnat.png]] Alter-Globalization - What if globalism wasn't shit?


 * [[File:Cosmo.png]] Cosmopolitanism - There is only one race, the human race.


 * [[File:Modnat.png]] Patriotism - Taking pride in everything your country has done without putting yourself above other countries is hella based. USA, USA, USA!


 * [[File:Civnat.png]] Civic Nationalism - I love the west.


 * [[File:Natprog.png]] National Progressivism - Basically me, just tone the former down to patriotism.


 * [[File:Internation.png]] Internationalism - Working together with other countries is based!


 * [[File:Social_corpratism.png]] Social Corporatism - Hello, based department?


 * [[File:NatProg.png]] Bull Moose Progressivism - Based trust-buster, but why'd you have to do so much imperialism?


 * [[File:Atheism.png]] Anglo-Secularism - Separation of church and state ftw.


 * [[File:Monkeyzz-Enlightenment.png]] Enlightenment - Your ideology gave birth to what we have now, although it may have given birth to some ugly things. Still the best thing that could've happened to humanity.


 * [[File:Reform.png]] Reformism - The best way to achieve political change in the case of liberal democracy.


 * [[File:Intercult.png]] Interculturalism - The best way to maintain a welfare state. Integrate people into our culture without being hateful to outside cultures and focusing too much on integration, perfection.


 * [[File:Leftpop-0.png]] Left-Wing Populism - POWER TO THE PEOPLE!


 * [[File:Dem.png]] Democracy - The LEAST worst system created, besides from all the others we've tried.


 * [[File:Soclib.png]] Social Liberalism - I was apolitically you, but I've moved somewhat left from you, still think your pretty based, and the best form of liberalism.


 * [[File:Statecap.png]] State Capitalism - State owned enterprise makes it a lot easier to do business.


 * [[File:Marketsoc.png]] Market Socialism - One of the best, and reality more practical socialists, he realizes the importance of markets.


 * [[File:Soccap.png]] Social Capitalism - Human centered capitalism? Based.


 * [[File:Regulationism.png]] Regulationism - Necessary so capitalism doesn't destroy the environment or become unethical.


 * [[File:Utility.png]] Mh:polcompball:Utilitarianism - The most accurate way to measure the happiness of a society.


 * [[File:Gay.png]] LGBT - The LGBT community are people like the rest of us and should be afforded the same rights as everyone else.

Friendly

 * [[File:Cap.png]] Capitalism - Capitalism is a good system but needs regulation and state intervention to ensure that it stays fair and doesn't become unethical


 * [[File:Socliber.png]] Social Libertarianism - Most tolerable libertarian.


 * [[File:Bhl.png]] Bleeding-Heart Libertarianism - One of the best libertarians, combine the social views of social libertarianism with this, and that would be me, but libertarian.


 * [[File:Laicism.png]] Laicism - While the church and state should be separate, you are too authoritarian for me. Better than having no separation of church and state at all, but still.


 * [[File:Clib.png]] Classical Liberalism - Without you, my ideology would've never come to existence. But, you're quite antiquated in the modern day. But, without the enlightenment, none of this would've been possible.


 * [[File:Transh.png]] Transhumanism - Based, but chill out on replacing people's body parts and stuff like that. Be more moderate, and you would basically be perfect.


 * [[File:Pan-Nationalism.png]] Pan-Nationalism - Culturally similar countries only have everything to gain by working together. But, some of your supporters are cringe. Be less ethnocentric please, and you would be very much based.


 * [[File:Corptism.png]] Corporatism - You're a good mode of production, but should focus on getting more welfarist...


 * [[File:Orlib.png]] Ordo-Liberalism - You're pretty okay, I'll give you that, the German market economy was based.


 * [[File:Georgist.png]] Georgism - I love free cats, and LVT as well. Although, free-trade is kinda cringe and LVT shouldn't be the only tax. Still has good ideas.

Neutral

 * [[File:Soc.png]] Socialism - I draw a lot from you and am often accused of being you by uneducated morons, but you go too far. Free-market capitalism is bad, but you're no better in reality.


 * [[File:Dsa.png]] Democratic Socialism - Meh ideology, useful allies. You may vote for Bernie, but capitalism should ultimately stay. Even if I'm not opposed to you, I still think that socialism is quite the stretch.


 * [[File:Multicult.png]] Multiculturalism - While you may be better than ethnic or racial nationalism, there needs to be a shared sense of culture to maintain a social democratic state, and its welfare policies. And you tend to focus on segregate people more than uniting them.


 * [[File:European_Federalism.png]] European Union - The European Union has been the most successful economic union and has brought Europe to be united. But, could use some obvious reforms in some regards, namely being countering the neoliberalism and reforming its institutions.


 * [[File:3way.png]] Third Way - Your economics go against the idea of a social democracy and military intervention is cringe and imperialist. Can you stop bombing countries in the middle east for one fucking minute? You make my ideology look like a complete joke.


 * [[File:Socauth.png]] Social Authoritarianism - Borderline social fascism, if you lean progressive then you get put here, if you lean conservative you get put in cringe. Not to mention, how a lot of the leaders just flat out suck, and have next to no redeeming qualities.


 * [[File:World_Federalism2.png]] World Federalism - Your intentions are good, but I'm not sure how practical this actually is and the problems with this ideology wouldn't even stop after it is achieved, but still good intentions none the less. Also, a lot of you guys are just blatant neoliberals.


 * [[File:Long.png]] Longism - Every man a king, every man a king! But you're like Bernie Sanders on steroids... Chill out with the authoritarianism and corruption will you?


 * [[File:Kemal.png]] Kemalism - Modernizing turkey and getting rid of the old ottoman crap was based, but treating ethnic and religious minorities like shit and the other stuff you did wasn't.


 * [[File:Patcon.png]] Paternalistic Conservatism - My more conservative self. If he wasn't conservative he'd be pretty good.


 * [[File:Hcon.png]] LGBT Conservatism [[File:Homocon.png]] - A complete contradiction, being progressive in one area isn't going to make me like you.


 * [[File:Glibr.png]] Green Libertarianism - Libertarianism is really cringe, but environmentalism is mega based. But, a free-market capitalist society would ultimately favor the economy over the environment.


 * [[File:Demcon.png]] Democratic Confederalism - Kurdistan should be a free country, but this as an ideology is uhh.. not that great.


 * [[File:Ford.png]] Fordism - Unironically, not the worst Dystopian ideology. wait this is a dystopia?


 * [[File:Pinkcap.png]] Pink Capitalism - While I hate the empty progressiveness of this ideology, you make old leftoids shit themselves, which is super based.


 * [[File:Cdem.png]] Christian Democracy - Your economics are the only thing that keep you from being put in the cringe category. Any government that bases its beliefs off of religious ones are cringe, along with being too soft on religious extremism. And sometimes actually panders it on the mask of being a "moderate".


 * [[File:Islamic_Democracy.png]] Islamic Democracy - Same as above. Has been forces for both good and bad. Also, keep your traditions to yourself.

Opposed

 * [[File:Conserv.png]] Conservatism - You have never conserved anything of worth, and never will.


 * [[File:Fiscon.png]] Fiscal Conservatism - The only thing you conserve are the wealth of the exploitive elite. I get some fiscal responsibility is needed, but come on now. Welfare states are based.


 * [[File:RepubUS.png]] Republican Party - Party for the rich. You don't even pretend to care about the working class.


 * [[File:Demcr.png]] Democratic Party - You may be slightly better than the afore mentioned party above you, but you also don't care about the working class either.


 * [[File:Confem.png]] Conservative Feminism - How can you claim to care about women rights?


 * [[File:Rpop-tinfoilhat.png]] Right-Wing Populism - Climate denial, racism, xenophobia, and conspiracy theories are very cringe.


 * [[File:WelfChauvin.png]] Welfare Chauvinism - Why only give welfare to one group of people??? I think this is what tankies meant by social fascism.


 * [[File:Consocf.png]] Conservative Socialism - You say progressivism and capitalism bread degeneracy, like I actually retrospectively care. Also, dictators are in-general bad.


 * [[File:Neoliberal-icon.png]] Neoliberalism - The bane and cause of all suffering within the modern world. Oppressing the global poor, trickle down economics, poverty, imperialism, ect. There's hardly any redeeming features of this ideology. Fuck you.


 * [[File:Necon.png]] Neoconservatism - The cause of a lot of suffering in developing countries and home abroad. Eroding civil liberties, pretty much legal terrorism, and much more. Your idea of spreading democracy is overthrowing democratically elected presidents and replacing them with brutal dictators? This is truly a despicable ideology.


 * [[File:Libertarian.png]] Libertarianism - Embracing all the bad parts about capitalism that would lead to a system where corporations take control over everyone's lives with little to no regulation to stop it? What can I say, other than really cringe, not to mention a lot of you guys are just republicans who want to smoke weed.


 * [[File:Community.png]] Communitarianism - I may be an economic collectivist, but opposing individualism and thinking that community is the best way to measure happiness is just dumb.


 * [[File:Corp.png]] Corporatocracy - This is what unregulated capitalism leads too.


 * [[File:World.png]] Globalism - International co-operation may be necessary for the betterment of mankind, but you're more often than not a pawn of neoliberals. Also, exploiting the global poor is just vomit worthy.


 * [[File:Paleolib.png]] Paleolibertarianism - How exactly do you expect a socially conservative society to maintain itself without strong government interference?


 * [[File:Conlib.png]] Conservative Liberalism - Classical liberal, my ass.


 * [[File:Libfem.png]] Liberal Feminism - How are war crimes any different if women are committing them?


 * [[File:Minarchist.png]] Minarchism - Why.


 * [[File:Confess.png]] Confessionalism - Seperate the church and state.


 * [[File:Ormarxf.png]] Marxism - We may agree on some things, but communism has still shown to ultimately fail each time it has been tried.


 * [[File:Isolationist.png]] Isolationism - Based military policy, but completely isolating yourself from world affairs is cringe.


 * [[File:Cultural_Nationalism.png]] Cultural Nationalism - I may support integrating immigrants, but you are just hateful towards those who aren't in your culture, and more often than, not racist as well.


 * [[File:Altl.png]] Alt-Lite - Not as bad as his racist counterpart, and atleast this movement provided a less destructive path compared to the Alt-Right. But still not good. Chud is still a chud.


 * [[File:Ultraprogressivism.png]] Revolutionary Progressivism - You make most progressives who are sane people look bad and give material for conservatives to strawman us with. Is tradition in of itself meaningless? Yes. Should we launch a new cultural revolution? No.


 * [[File:Trad.png]] Traditionalism - "oH ReTurN To TrAdItIoN, ReJeCt DeGeNeRaCy, mY LiTtLe DaRk AgE1!1!1!" Lmao, how about no. How about you do something better with your life than making dumb "based and trad little dark age" edits on Youtube?


 * [[File:Awaj.png]] Anarchism - Unless there is something that stands out about one of your variants, you get put here.

Furthest Opposed

 * [[File:Fash.png]] Fascism - You realize, being edgy isn't a political persona. Right?


 * [[File:Nazi.png]] National Socialism - Oh, you're a Nazi? Name me all the suicide methods you could use to kill yourself.


 * [[File:Eugen.png]] Eugenicism & [[File:Darwinist.png]] Social Darwinism - Retarded neo-nazi ideology.


 * [[File:Marxlen.png]] Marxist Leninism - You tankies have the audacity to call us fascists when your ideology has killed millions, and your praxis is denying genocide and mass starvation. The average worker doesn't need an elitist vanguard party controlling every aspect of their life.


 * [[File:Austrobert.png]] Austrolibertarianism - A society without any taxation or regulations at all is one that wouldn't objectively work.


 * [[File:Plcn2.png]] Paleoconservatism - God doesn't objectively exist, the United states isn't a Christian nation nor will your fictional book get to dictate any laws within this country, and this ideology is the definition of retardness. Also, a lot of people who unironically identify with this are neo-nazis, like Nick Fuentes. Keep malding over the rising secularism and irreligiously of Western civilization, people just realize that God doesn't exist, it's not my fault I'm not fearing an authority that doens't exist.


 * [[File:Reactcross.png]] Reactionarism - Not only do you want to keep worthless traditions modern conservatives can't even conserve, but you want to bring back objectively harmful traditions?


 * [[File:ReactPix.png]] Reactionary Modernism - You are a walking contradiction.


 * [[File:Christy.png]] [[File:JewTheo.png]] [[File:Muslim 2.png]] [[File:Hind.png]] [[File:Bud.png]] Theocracies - Your fictional book doesn't get to dictate how I live my life.


 * [[File:RelNat.png]] Religious Nationalism - Read above. We do not need such mindless divisions like this fracturing the unity of our country.


 * [[File:Ethplur.png]] Ethnopluralism & [[File:Ethnonat.png]] Ethnic Nationalism - Ethnic cleansing and xenophobia are cringe.


 * [[File:AnEn.png]] Anti-Environmentalism - You have caused millions of deaths, and many more to come. You are the biggest threat in the West, and needs to be countered.


 * [[File:Neolud.png]] Neoluddism - I care for the environment, which is why I oppose you. Atleast you don't deny basic science, but still, really horrible.


 * [[File:Imp.png]] Imperialism - Not even remotely acceptable in the modern day, disgusting ideology. Denying the rights of native populations just to subjugate them into your Empire is deplorable.


 * [[File:Ethno.png]] Ethnocracy & [[File:Racenat.png]] Racial Nationalism - This is just funny because of how sad it is, shouldn't even have to explain why.


 * [[File:Ancapf.png]] Anarcho-Capitalism - All of your followers are terminally ill 13 year olds who just discovered politics lmao.


 * [[File:Authoritarian_Conservatism.png]] Authoritarian Conservatism - The actual moderate wing of fascism.


 * [[File:Totalitarian.png]] Totalitarianism - The definition of pure and utter evil. The only thing your ideology successfully does is turn every country with it into a living hell hole.


 * [[File:Ingsocf.png]] Ingsoc - Literally 1984. Kill it with fire.

Regional Ideology Relations =
 * [[File:Monarch.png]] All Monarchists - Monarchism is no way to run a government in any circumstance in the 21st centaury.

Positive

 * [[File:Nordmodel.png]] Nordic Model -
 * [[File:Native.png]] Indigenism -
 * [[File:Orlib.png]] Ordo-Liberalism -
 * [[File:NatProg.png]] Bull Moose Progressivism -
 * [[File:Dubcekism.png]] Socialism with a Human Face -

Neutral

 * [[File:Kemal.png]] Kemalism -
 * [[File:Long.png]] Longism -
 * [[File:Athdem.png]] Athenian Democracy -
 * [[File:European_Federalism.png]] European Federalism -
 * [[File:Tito.png]] Titoism -
 * [[File:Rockrep.png]] Rockefeller Republicanism -

Negative

 * [[File:Absoc.png]] Arab Socialism - Ah yes, replace the colonizers with brutal dictatorships. You may have been better than the colonizers, but you were still bound to fail.
 * [[File:Antijap.png]] Anti-Japaneseism - Imagine for a minute, you make your entire ideology just about ethnic self hatred.
 * [[File:Baath.png]] Ba'athism -
 * [[File:Gaddafi.png]] Gaddafism -
 * [[File:Chavismo.png]] Chavismo -
 * [[File:Guevara.png]] Guevarism - Why do progressives look up to you? You were a horrible dictator whose achieves are overpraised to make up for the many shortcomings you had. Along with being racist and homophobic, there's literally nothing good about you.
 * [[File:Trumpism.png]] Trumpism - Horrible president, failed to complish a whole lot while only further dividing the country with his heretic. Literally no saving graces about this.
 * [[File:Zio.png]] Zionism -
 * [[File:Onenatcon.png]] One-Nation Conservatism -

Very Negative
Anti-Ideology Relations =
 * [[File:Dengf.png]] Dengism - Why are there two pages for national socialism? Wait, actually. Comparing you to national socialism would be too mean to national socialism, as at least that is an environmental ideology. When during your market reform and liberalization period, you still cracked down on dissent, and with those reforms disappearing more and more, and China bringing itself to demise, you are just downright evil. There is no other way to say it.
 * [[File:Stalin.png]] Stalinism - Bloodthirsty maniac who defeated the nazis just to use the same means the nazi's used against the Jews directly onto the Jews again. And, a pedo as well.
 * [[File:Juche.png]] Juche - Korean INGSOC.
 * [[File:Burmasoc.png]] Burmese Way to Socialism -
 * [[File:Khom.png]] Khomeinism -
 * [[File:Jihad.png]] Jihadism - I don't have to explain why terrorism is wrong, now do I?
 * [[File:Polpot.png]] Pol Potism -

Positive
Anti-Authoritarianism - Death to authoritarianism.

Anti-Imperialism - Empires are evil, and shouldn't exist.

Anti-Dengism - China, as a government, is totalitarian, has no respect for progressive values, and is committing the biggest crime against humanity since the holocaust. Fuck the CCP, you don't get shit on or demonized nearly enough, considering the fact that there shitheads defending you. Taiwan is the real China, cope tankies.

Anti-Putinism - Russia is an imperialist power that should have its shit kicked in by the West.

Anti-Anarchism - Authority sucks, but there still needs to be a state.

Anti-Racism - Racism is a modern day evil that has no place in society.

Anti-Monarchism - What retard is unironically endorsing monarchy as a form of government in the 21st century?

Anti-Clericalism - Church authority should decline in the daily lives of citizens. However, I oppose doing that through authoritarian means.

Anti-Communism - Communism has failed each time.

Anti-Fascism - Fascism as a political ideology has been reduced to being practiced by terminally online 14 year olds who just discovered politics.

Anti-Nazism - Yeah, I don't think I have to explain this one.

Anti-Austerity - Austerity measures has been a disaster for the public as a whole.

Anti-Prolife - Abortion isn't murder, simple as.

Anti-Old Leftism - The old left are a bunch of wannabe revolutionaries who call anything they don't like shitlibs while their only praxis from what I've seen is being terminally online, and endorsing anything that goes against western hegemony, like: China, Russia, Hungary, Belarus, ect.

Anti-Conservatism - Traditions ultimately stem from the past, and thus, are not to be held sacred.

Anti-Colonalism - Colonalism is an evil that must be fought against.

Mixed
Anti-Capitalism - While free market capitalism is bad, endorsing anti-capitalism is too far for me.

Euroscepticism - Depends if you're opening to reforming the European Union, or for outright leaving it.

Anti-Globalism - Depends if you're talking about international co-operation or trade.

Anti-Socialism - I don't think socialism is feasible to fully implement either, but you need to chill out with being against any form of welfare or government intervention in the economy.

Anti-Nationalism - You can like your country and still be an internationalist and cosmopolitian, y'know? Even if you do have a point.

Negative
Anti-Wokeism - You are literally just used to strawman any progressive talking point, shut the fuck up.

Anti-Feminism - Feminism is still needed in society. And besides, many of you guys just are just blatant misogynists who hate women.

Anti-Porn - Tell me you're retarded without telling me you're retarded.

Anti-Abortionism - Oh, wait. I found something that is just as equally as retarded as above.

Anti-Progressivism - Bruh.

Anti-Individualism - Individuality is still needed within society, even if I call for economic collectivism, I'm still a cultural individualist.

Anti-Westernism - Western hegemony has done more for the progressive moment, and the world than the hegemony of other powers, and therefore makes no sense to be against it. Ideological Relations= (Note: This is purely ideological)

Good

 * [[File:Kirblyism-Icon.png]] Kirbly ([[File:Socgeo.png]]/[[File:Transh.png]])- Very based progressivism. Not sure about this whole world federalism and transhumanism thing though. But I can admire your futuristic world-view, even if it is far-fetched. You're pretty based.


 * [[File:Ninjack.png]] Ninjack-Aus ([[File:Libms.png]]/[[File:World_Federalism2.png]]) - You have pretty good cultural views, and good economics. although military intervention is cringe. You seem like a good person


 * [[File:Mebrouk.png]] Mebrouk ([[File:Socdem.png]]/[[File:Islamic_Liberalism.png]]) - We're basically the same, very based ideologically wise. Although, a religious democracy for me is really eh considering everything I've said about it, but in your case it would be the most practical.


 * [[File:BeryAbLib.png]] BeryAb ([[File:NeoClib.png]]/[[File:Nalib.png]]) - For someone whose right-libertarian leaning, you're pretty based. Our principles our the same but our end goals are different. Overall, good. (Also massive shame your reddit account got terminated out of no where, rip)


 * [[File:YellingLiber.png]] YellingYowie ([[File:Socliber.png]]/[[File:Neobert.png]]) - While your economics and cultural stances are acceptable, your foreign policy is severely misguided. Like, how do you plan on waging war in countries while also having a small government?


 * [[File:Liberal-icon.png]] Liberal ([[File:Scientocracy_Small.png]]/[[File:Socdem.png]]) - I like what I see here, based!


 * [[File:Enaysikey.png]] Enaysikey ([[File:Socliber.png]]/[[File:Neotech.png]]) - Welfare libertarian, nice. Although being into eugenics is weird.


 * [[File:Avelicius.png]] Joogotakensaad ([[File:Soccap.png]]/[[File:Progconf.png]]) - Welfare capitalist, based. But you could be more accepting of globalism, it isn't that bad of a thing like everyone says it is.


 * [[File:Cflski.png]] Sykar Socialist ([[File:3princ.png]]/[[File:Socdem.png]]) - Your economics don't sound bad and you also hate the PRC as well, so you're pretty well off in my book.


 * [[File:JudePortrait.png]] High Priest Jude ([[File:Dsa.png]]/[[File:Leftpop-0.png]]) - DemSoc, tolerable. Based cultural views too.


 * [[File:TonyNew.png]] Tony567 ([[File:Marketsoc.png]]/[[File:Sep.png]]) - Really weird set of beliefs. Market socialism is pretty eh, as an economy centered around workers co-ops has shown to be the most successful form of socialism, but still not desirable. Along with this separatism stuff.


 * [[File:Vonali.png]] Vonali ([[File:Socliber.png]]/[[File:Civlibert.png]]) - Progressive Social Libertarianism, not bad.


 * [[File:Skyrum536.png]] Skyrum536 ([[File:Demsocstar.png]]/[[File:Prog.png]]) - DemSoc, against authoritarianism and is a democratic federalist. Nice.


 * [[File:EvolvingSoc.png]] DuyQuangNguyenPham ([[File:Marketsoc.png]]/[[File:Civnat.png]]) - A more leftist version of me, I agree with him on a lot of stuff.


 * [[File:TheIced.png]] The Iced ([[File:Georgist.png]]/[[File:Transh.png]]) - Too reliant on free markets but LVT is based, and so is cultural progressivism.


 * [[File:SamKibGuy_icon_.png]] SamkibGuy ([[File:Republicanismpix.png]]/[[File:Thar.png]]) - Your ideology is good, but I don't understand how you can like authoritarian communists while fighting for democracy at the same time. Atleast we agree on Social democracy which is based.


 * [[File:Yoda8soup.png]] Yoda8soup ([[File:Socgeo.png]]/[[File:Ecosoc.png]]) - Your economics for me personally are too left-wing, but your progressivism, and environmentalism are both very based.


 * [[File:RabbitIcon.png]] ComradeRabit95 ([[File:Demsocstar.png]]/[[File:Leftnat.png]]) - Too lefty, but not bad. Don't know a whole lot about your ideology since you don't have anything on your page, just going off your ideologies alone.


 * [[File:And3small.png]] And3 ([[File:LibSocDemIcon.png]]/[[File:Globnat.png]]) - Seems like a libertarian and slightly more leftist version of me, what can I say, but, pretty based.


 * [[File:Silasf.png]] Sorcersilas is here ([[File:Distributist.png]]/[[File:Libms.png]]) - I prefer unions, but still, a decently good ideology.


 * [[File:Liberalsoc.png]] TheJester ([[File:Liberalsoc.png]]/[[File:Marketsoc.png]]) - Too left-wing for me personally, but still a decently based ideology. Love your cultural takes.


 * [[File:Realisticamm.png]] Am_m ([[File:Libms.png]]/[[File:Libsoc.png]]) - I'm glad to see your back. Your new ideology doesn't look that different, other than the world federalism. Your idea of a world government is interesting, but really idealistic. Other than that, I think this ideology is ok. I like civil libertarianism.

Meh

 * [[File:NSL.png]] Pirate Tails ([[File:Natprog.png]]/[[File:Liberaltarianism.png]])- If you were less nationalist then you'd be fine.


 * [[File:Sweatingcup.png]] SweatingCup2632 ([[File:Sec.png]]/[[File:Newkeynes.png]]) - We're both welfarists which is based, but authoritarianism and Military intervention? Nah. Atleast you recognize EU and Globalism as a good thing.


 * [[File:Neoairisu.png]] SumisuAirisu ([[File:Demcon.png]]/[[File:Anqueer.png]]) - Meh honestly, not a fan of anarchism but could be worse.


 * [[File:Councilguy2.png]] Councilguy ([[File:Anpostleft.png]]/[[File:Ego.png]])- Not fond of egoism, but you're a nice user.


 * [[File:Ultroneism.png]] LordCompost86 ([[File:Ego.png]]/[[File:Skepticism.png]]) - Obviously not a fan of this ideology or egoism, but you seem like a nice person.


 * [[File:PostChronic.png]] ChronicFemcel ([[File:Anpostleft.png]]/[[File:Post-an.png]]) - Cringe egoist but nice person.


 * [[File:Neotechnocracy.png]] BasedCringeOrMeh ([[File:Neotechnocracy.png]]/[[File:Transh.png]])- Pretty based economically and culturally, but authoritarianism isn't based and democracy is cool.


 * [[File:Nivballf.png]] Niveous Laccolith ([[File:Ego.png]]/[[File:Anpostleft.png]]) - Anarchism is cringe. But is socially progressive.


 * [[File:Ancom_Furry.png]] ThisIsMyUsernameAAAA ([[File:Ancom.png]]/[[File:Antifa.png]]) - Based cultural values, but being an ancom isn't helping.


 * [[File:Affiliated-grump.png]] Affiliated ([[File:Postciv.png]]/[[File:Econil.png]]) - Some post civilization leftist, wonky and funny tbh.


 * [[File:TDRH.png]] ThatDudeRightHere ([[File:Liberalconservative.png]]/[[File:Cdem.png]]) - Not a whole lot to say about this, moderate conservativism is whatever to be honest. We do have a lot in common in interests through so that's cool.


 * [[File:Bsaheedism-icon.png]] Bsaheed527 ([[File:Post-an.png]]/[[File:Anpostleft.png]]) - Yeah, I'm really unsure what to say about this ideology. You as a person though, are chill.


 * [[File:Ashley.png]] AshleyHere ([[File:Libsoc.png]]/[[File:Indiv.png]]) - I honestly like your new ideological development. Still not great, but better than what it was before. Libertarian socialism atleast is a step up.


 * [[File:TipuiSmall.png]] Tipui ([[File:Ego.png]]/[[File:Anpostleft.png]]) - Another egoist, okay this is getting out of hand. I will say your earlier years were quite based, if that means anything.


 * [[File:M99.png]] M99.exe ([[File:Synd.png]]/[[File:Ormarxf.png]]) - A communist, albeit not the worst one I've seen and seems to be friendly towards socdems, atleast you're pragmatic.


 * [[File:DragonRed.png]] DragonRed ([[File:Dsa.png]]/[[File:Leftnat.png]]) - While promoting scientific advancement is definitely based, your authoritarianism is definitely not.


 * [[File:AbEntball.png]] The Grand Anarch ([[File:Post-an.png]]/[[File:Hedonism-cloud.png]]) - So you managed to make your ideology even more crazy, but honestly a step up from your last.


 * [[File:Drunkardsdjxfh.png]] Stk ([[File:Neoliberal-icon.png]]/[[File:Libhawk.png]]) - Doesn't fail in every regard, so gets refrained from putting in cringe. But still, neoliberal economics is cringe, and being a liberal hawk is no better than a Neoconservative.


 * [[File:S1984.png]] Savvas1984 ([[File:Statlib.png]]/[[File:Transh.png]]) - You're an unironic state liberal? Only good thing is your technological take.


 * [[file:Syntridem2.png]] Applethesky2021 ([[File:Cdem.png]]/[[File:Georgist.png]]) - Your mindless puritanicalness and interventionism are just awful, also worshiping dictators like Chiang kai shek is just cringe, the only good thing is your economics.


 * [[File:PagTheo.png]] Pantheon ([[File:Unimon.png]]/[[File:SocDist.png]]) - Surprisingly based economics, and I like civil libertarianism. But man, that monarchism stuff has to go. Also, is a vaushite as well.


 * [[File:Ioist.png]] Iooootheanarchist ([[File:Anqueer.png]]/[[File:Antifa.png]]) - Just your typical anarshit. Also, is weirdly an interventionist as well? Makes sense considering they are a vaushite. Atleast you have seemingly tolerable cultural takes.


 * [[File:InexUser.png.png]] Inexistent-User ([[File:Soctrans.png]]/[[File:Technocracy.png]]) - The only bit I really like about this is your endorsement of technological development, everything else is pretty cringe though.


 * [[File:TheElectricBomb.png]] TheElectricBomb ([[File:Lpop.png]]/[[File:Dsa.png]]) - Hating NATO and socialism is kinda cringe. But, I did indeed epically troll you.


 * [[File:Novochirotesla.png]] Chirotesla ([[File:Marketsoc.png]]/[[File:Consocf.png]]) - Your ideology may be one of the least bad out of the old leftists, but it has seriously gotten worse over time. Too left-wing on economics. Being anti-imperialist, environmentalist, a fair-trade protectionist, pro-choice, cultural integration that focuses more on culture tolerance, and more tolerant on LGBT issues than your other friends, which are all welcome. But, overall, too conservative for my liking.


 * [[File:Anglo-Germanic_Socialist.png]] Anglo-germanic socialist ([[File:Ormarxf.png]]/[[File:Progress.png]]) - Progressivism is hella based, but Marxism isn't.


 * [[File:MLM.png]] Marsvner ([[File:MLM.png]]/[[File:Ultraprogressivism.png]]) - I'm really not a fan of Marxism, but progressivism (even if you take it way too far for my liking) is cool.

Not Good

 * [[File:Typicalfan2.png]] Typicalfan4 ([[File:Altl.png]]/[[File:Natcon.png]])- Some mexican AfD stan, never thought I would be saying that. Overall cringe but is moderate on some issues.


 * [[File:USLibertarians.png]] NotADopeMan ([[File:Chilib.png]]/[[File:Obj.png]]) - A libertarian whose completely opposed to state intervention? Cringe, albeit not the worst thing I've seen. It's still pretty bad.


 * [[File:Libcon.png]] ResponsibleCitizen ([[File:Libcon.png]]/[[File:Conlib.png]]) - Conservativism and Libertarianism are gigasoy, along with isolationism. You seriously want the US to give up its influence in the world as a hyperpower? What is wrong with you?


 * [[File:SomeCrusade.png]] SomeCrusader1224 ([[File:Trad.png]]/[[File:Conlib.png]]) - This dude is my opposite in almost every way other than government, not a bad person though.


 * [[File:Quark.png]] Quark ([[File:StateathFedora.png]]/[[File:Corptism.png]]) - I don't like religious conservatives either, but this dude takes his hate on religion way too far, wanting to outlaw it and persecute people based on their beliefs, which is no more dogmatic than the people he opposes. But economically wise, he's good.


 * [[File:Smelegem.png]] Smelegem ([[File:MLM.png]]/[[File:Islamic_Democracy.png]]) - Unironic maoist. Literally one of the worst communists to ever exist in the history of ever with the worst economics that I've ever heard. Cool person though ig.


 * [[File:RojanALT.PNG]] Rojo346 ([[File:Conlib.png]]/[[File:Socliber.png]]) - Typical conservative, nahhhh... You as a person are fine though.


 * [[File:NeoLibtard.png]] ANewDude ([[File:Neoliberal-icon.png]]/[[File:Kak.png]]) - Illiterate neoliberal cuck who thinks hating neoliberalism means hating the global poor.


 * [[File:Distributist.png]] Dumnorix ([[File:Distributist.png]]/[[File:Trad.png]]) - Cringe conservative, but it's not everyday you see a traditionalist libleft.


 * [[File:JoeyFloppa_boo.png]] JoeyFloppa ([[File:Libcon.png]]/[[File:Austrobert.png]]) - I hardly see how you're an Individualist.


 * [[File:LeninisBasedsmall.png]] Leninisbased556 ([[File:ML.png]]/[[File:Authprog.png]]) - Progressivism is cool, but pretty cringy Marxist-leninist. (Also why are you so anti-semetic?)


 * [[File:Danielspaniel-Icon.png]] Danieltenspaniel ([[File:ML.png]]/[[File:StateathFedora.png]]) - A tankie who is atleast socially progressive.


 * [[File:MossadTest.png]] Mossad ([[File:Relzion.png]]/[[File:Conlib.png]]) - A religious conservative who stands for Israel. Basically PragerUism.


 * [[File:Azathoth.png]] Azathoth ([[File:Post-an.png]]/[[File:CountEn.png]]) - Nothing against you but you reject enlightenment thinking and are a reactionary anarchist, but you're not even socially conservative so you don't get put in the lowest tier.


 * [[File:Statlibertarian.png]] SuddenWriter - ([[File:Libertarian.png]]/[[File:Anticommunism.png]]) - I refuse to believe this is anything other than a meme lmao.


 * [[File:Soyjak.png]] AnAnonBoi123 ([[File:Postconan.png]]/[[File:Kak.png]]) - get a userpage soyboy, I've never heard you had a single good take.


 * [[File:Cball-France-Beret.png]] Cheebow8 ([[File:Conservative.png]]/[[File:Trumpism.png]]) - Yeah, I'm basically not convinced by anything I read on this page. Conservatism is cringe and soy. Although, you are very friendly from what I've observed, I will give you that.


 * [[File:SST-icon.png]] ShadowRaiden ([[File:Consocf.png]]/[[File:Distributist.png]]) - You are too statist for my liking. With your isolationism, which I dislike, is really cringe for me. As I like economic unions and military alliances. Not to mention your ideology leans heavily into assimilation more than cultural tolerance, which for me is also cringe. Along with your cultural conservative stances in the first world, with some saving graces, are also cringe. At least we both want fair-trade protectionism. Not to mention, your economics being too left-wing for me is also kinda cringe as well.
 * [[File:DN_Adm.png]] DarknightYuusha-11 ([[File:Consocf.png]]/[[File:Marketsoc.png]]) - Basically, everything I said about Shadow could be applied to you, with there being not a whole of differences. Too left-wing on economics, first world cultural conservatism, and being really lenient on authoritarianism are really cringe for me.
 * [[File:Balodismconsmall.png]] IvarBalodis ([[File:Guildsoc.png]]/[[File:Consocf.png]]) - Corporatism is nice, even if it is socialist corporatism. Not to mention, "progressive in the third world, conservative in the first", or in other words, just conservative. Along with being too left-wing economically.
 * [[File:NeoML.png]] NotLibra ([[File:ML.png]]/[[File:Guevara.png]]) - Marxist-Leninist, not good. Atleast you are socially progressive and don't simp for revisionism like a lot of modern ML's.

Bruh

 * [[File:KaiserKlaus.png]] KaiserKlausMouse ([[File:PanGerman.png]]/[[File:Cball-CSA.png]]) - This American doesn't even speak German fluently and is trying to pass himself off as a wannabe German nationalist lmao. Literally just admitted on his page he got a hard on from looking at a map of the German empire, and that's were his ideology came from. It's literally every single wehraboo fantasy I've ever read. Also, those civil liberties are what allow you to be on the internet, you only believe in freedom of speech because it allows you to say the stuff you say on the internet. You're an obvious fascist to anyone with more than 2 braincells.


 * [[File:Ukraiana.png]] Ukraiana ([[File:Nazi.png]]/[[File:Nazcap-Hat.png]]) - Yeah, I don't have to explain why I don't like the open nazi. Unironically, supports actions by the Nazis while his comments on racial nationalism and the alt-right basically say everything.


 * [[File:MedDavilanda.png]] Davilanda13 ([[File:Ancapf.png]]/[[File:Reactcross.png]]) - What a steaming pile of horseshit of an ideology. Ancaps are super edgy.


 * [[File:ReactionaryCentrism6.png]] Bannned ([[File:Cfash.png]]/[[File:Christy.png]]) - Firstly, this "centrist" was hardly a centrist. Secondly, Cringe edgelord larper. Glad SumisuAirisu made you live up to your username. Good riddance lol.


 * [[File:Coindorni-icon-new.png]] Coindorni ([[File:Ancapf.png]]/[[File:Reactcross.png]]) - Another reactionary ancap, how much of you guys just are secretly fascists in denial?


 * [[File:Vizantion-Storm.png]] TheHellenicStorm ([[File:Strasser.png]]/[[File:Flang.png]]) - Nazi, credit where credit is due though you're an actual national socialist. Still a Nazi, which is fucking cringe, retarded, and most definitely a larp.


 * [[File:OrthReactPaleominarchist.png]] BasedRussianMikuru ([[File:Feud.png]]/[[File:Orth.png]]) - A reactionary theocratic larper who has defended feudalism. Overall very cringe and weird.


 * [[File:Heinrich_Cheung.png]] Heinrich Cheung ([[File:Nazi.png]]/[[File:Nazcap-Hat.png]]) - So this is the "superior aryan master race" I've heard so highly about, huh? Totally not a larp.


 * [[File:Classfash.png]] LKR15tye ([[File:Euras.png]]/[[File:Fash.png]]) - Fashoid. "He hates me as much as he hates the nazis according to his page". Your ideology has lead to nothing but death, destruction, and misery for all that had to suffer under it.


 * [[File:Duckf.png]] Duck-Citizen ([[File:Ancapf.png]]/[[File:Reactcross.png]]) - ancap? check. reactionary? check. vomit worthy ideology? check.


 * [[File:TolkienIRLicon.png]] Tolkien_IRL ([[File:Abmon.png]]/[[File:Nazcap-Hat.png]]) - If this serious, I have actually zero words.


 * [[File:Palostius.png]] Palostius ([[File:Ingsocf.png]]/[[File:Mansphere.png]]) - Sexist incel larper. How long as your ass been without a shower, holy shit. This entire dude's personality is gloating his shit takes.


 * [[File:Dualusf.png]] DualPlay1 ([[File:Statesoc.png]]/[[File:StateathFedora.png]]) - A conservative authoritarian communist. Basically just a cringier version of quark.


 * [[File:Noel21231-icon.png]] Noel21231 ([[File:Altl.png]]/[[File:Reactlib.png]]) - Lol what horse shit beliefs, being progressive in one area is not going to make me want to like you, openly being an anti-semite and simping neo-nazis is very cringe, even if you don't claim to support everything they do


 * [[File:EpicConIcon.png]] NazBolGANG12 ([[File:Tradcon.png]]/[[File:Distributist.png]]) - Ok, on a serious note, you're not getting put here because of your personality but because of your ideology. Your personality is fine, your ideology on the other hand is very cringe.


 * [[File:Socnat.png]] AmericanFuturist ([[File:Socnat.png]]/[[File:Fash.png]]) - Was cringe the first time, is still cringe the second time.


 * [[File:Baconsalad123_Icon.png]] Baconsalad123 ([[File:Sorelia.png]]/[[File:Nazi.png]]) - Racial nationalism, totalitarianism, fascism. Easily one of the most dystopian self-inserts on this site.


 * [[File:Svs.png]] SNEEDIVS ([[File:Catheo.png]]/[[File:Monarch.png]]) - Bruh why are there so many reactards on this site. I think this dude actually thinks it's the 10th century or something.


 * [[File:NatDem.png]] Black drone ([[File:Authcap.png]]/[[File:Authoritarian_Conservatism.png]]) - Now, this is a prime example as to why I will never get my morality from religion (as if every single reacttard on this site wasn't example enough). Where do I start? Authoritarian religious conservatism and manosphere? Yeah, along with you supporting corrupt politicians while being supposedly "anti-corruption". Pretty bad.


 * [[File:Firebender12345ism.png]] Firebender12345 ([[File:Monarch.png]]/[[File:3P.png]]) - Lol, Monarcho-fascist who wants to restore a failed political systems back in Ireland. Monarchy and fascism is dead for a reason, good luck with that.


 * [[File:FabiusBigGayHat.png]] PaleoFabius ([[File:Altr.png]]/[[File:Hfash.png]]) - This dude is a walking meme, called several users racial inferior and harassed them. As if his horrible ideology wasn't enough, with a terrible personality as well, with being the most stereotypical alt-right moron you could think of, his new ideology is even worse.


 * [[File:Mysticism.png]] Mysticism ([[File:Esofash.png]]/[[File:Nazi.png]]) - Ok, this is just straight up out of a paradox strategy game. It's actually hilarious.


 * [[File:ImmorThought.png]] TheImmorxy ([[File:Statesoc.png]]/[[File:Hoxha.png]]) - Just your averagely unremarkable Totalitarian Marxist-Leninist. Basically, nothing good.


 * [[File:Mikolayism_Pixel2.png]] MedicsChaotics ([[File:ModStrasser.png]]/[[File:Consocf.png]]) - Claims not to be anti-semitic, yet uses anti-semitic dogwhistles? Also, what is the hell is "moderate strasserism"? Any way, your authoritarianism and unironic liking of otto strasser are just massive nopes.


 * [[File:PATS.png]] ChineseSocialist ([[File:Dengf.png]]/[[File:XiJinpingThoughtf.png]]) - Just your average totalitarian dengoid china defender. Atleast you don't pretend that CCP is a government that respects human rights, which is atleast a nice surprise, as a lot of China defenders I see try to make China out to be better than what it is, you don't bother with any of that. Also, China isn't transitioning to socialism by 2050, nor are you a Marxist-Leninist.


 * [[File:Dengf.png]] 国际联盟球 ([[File:Dengf.png]]/[[File:XiJinpingThoughtf.png]]) - Bruh, China is a totalitarian one party dictatorship with no respect for human rights. To side with all countries in the world, you choose the Chinese government?

IRL People Relations =
 * [[File:Yugotard.png]] YugoslavPartisan2 ([[File:SJW.png]]/[[File:Antifa.png]]) - Bruh, not everyone who supports the West is a woke imperialist racist, you moron. Even if you were somewhat based for what you did to fascists on this site, the fact that you're an unironic Stalinoid who harassed people who weren't even fascist is just a massive bruh moment in of itself. Basically, just imagine your most stereotypical reddit communist, and that is Yugo.

Positive

 * [[File:Sanders.png]] Bernie Sanders - You're a promising candidate, and have been fairly consistent on your views for your political carrier, which is admirable.


 * [[File:Shoecialism.png]] Shoe0nHead - You were one of my first inspirations and introductions to politics. Although your earlier days were quite cringe. You've earned a special spot for one of the first political commentators I watched.


 * [[File:Mill.png]] John Stuart Mill - The harm principle is based. Do what you want to do as long as you're not harming others is how society should be run.


 * [[File:RussiaOfTheFuture.png]] Alexei Navalny - You expose the corruption of the United Russia Party and are way better alternative to the current Russian government.


 * [[File:Lincolnism.png]] Abraham Lincoln - Ended slavery, shame you got assassinated.


 * [[File:Classlib.png]] John Locke - While I am not a big fan of your economic model, you were quite based for your time, and so was the enlightenment. The way you fought against reactionary retards and monarchists was certified based.


 * [[File:FDRismF.png]] Franklin D. Roosevelt - Gigachad in a lot of ways, fought against the Nazis and Japanese Imperalists, shame you had to put the Japanese in internment camps, and while they weren't on the same level as the holocaust, still sucks you had to do that.


 * [[File:Corbynism-ball.png]] Jeremy Corbyn - You're basically the british Bernie Sanders, so that's based. Although your economics for me personally are too left-wing. Keep sticking it to those war hawks and neolibtards.


 * [[File:NatProg.png]] Theodore Roosevelt - Easily the best president we've ever had, up there with FDR. Although your Imperalism was pretty bad.


 * [[File:Keynes.png]] John Maynard Keynes - The man who invented the best economic model, stay mad lolberts.


 * [[File:Gore.png]] Al Gore - Based environmentalism, you would've been a lot better in many ways to George Bush.


 * [[File:MLK_Jr.png]] Martin Luther King Jr - One of the best civil rights leaders in the 20th century, shame you got assassinated.


 * [[File:Cball-Ukraine.png]] Volodymyr Zelenskyy - The sheer weight of the balls on this man. Keep fighting for the future of Ukraine! Slava Ukraini!


 * [[File:Gorb.png]] Mikhail Gorbachev - Democratized the USSR, ended censorship, and was overall based.

Neutral/Mixed

 * [[File:AOC.png]] Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez - You come off as too politically inexperienced for me, progressivism is cool. Although my leftism only goes as far as social democracy.


 * [[File:Obamium.png]] Barrack Obama - You did some good things like Obamacare and giving gay people marriage rights, but expanding the surveillance state and the drone strikes were very cringe.


 * [[File:Bidenism.png]] Joe Biden - Your presidency up until this point as been the mixed bag. You may have done more good under your presidency than trump has, but you're still not what we need. Atleast your foreign policy in Ukraine has been superb. And the economic mess could've been handled better. But not your fault, it's even made worse by the fact that Republicans have actively been worsening the economy crisis and preventing you from fixing inflation. And you did do a good thing pulling out of Afghanistan, but even that was botched as well. I love your trade tariffs on China and your hawkish view towards the Chinese government. But even then, you seriously want to ease up those trade restrictions? Your candidacy has been overall not bad, but, ultimately not desirable.


 * [[File:Statlib.png]] Justin Trudeau - I don't really like you but I can't really imagine what Canada would be like without the Liberal Democratic party. Even if I don't like it.


 * [[File:Long.png]] Huey Long - While you did a lot of good for the state of Louisiana, the way you did it was bad! While you may be one of the only good authoritarians, someone could easily come on in and undue all your work and do worse and there would be nobody to stop them.


 * [[File:Tito.png]] Josip Broz Tito - Most practical socialist, although authoritarianism is cringe. Atleast you threw fascists into pits and returned them to where they should go, which is undoubtedly based.


 * [[File:Cball-British_India.png]] George Orwell - Being against authoritarianism is based, but your homophobia, conservatism, and general prejudice are cringe.


 * [[File:Kemal.png]] Mustafa Kemal Ataturk - Modernizing turkey was based, but why all the genocide and other stuff?

Negative

 * [[File:Trumpism.png]] Donald Trump - You were one of the worst presidents America had in the 21st century. Your tax cuts did not help anyone but the rich, your attacks on American democracy and your authoritarianism, careless protectionist policies, climate denialism. Realistically, should've been impeached. How you haven't been disowned by the GOP establishment astounds me.


 * [[File:Vaushism.png]] Vaush - Don't care too much about his ideology but personality wise, yeah he's pretty bad. He defended child porn and is probably a zoophile.


 * [[File:McCarthy.png]] McCarthy - An example of right-wing cancel culture.


 * [[File:Reagan.png]] Ronald Reagan - Overall, one of the worst presidents America ever had to endure, tricke-down economics are a scam that only made the rich richer and the poor poorer, funded terrorists, and your presidency still has a profound effect on America today. (you're also in hell waiting for heaven to trickle onto you)


 * [[File:Thatcher.png]] Margaret Thatcher - Ding dong, the wicked bitch is dead.


 * [[File:Shapirocube.png]] Ben Shapiro - You're a massive dumbass who can only win debates with college kids. Why anyone listens to you is beyond me.


 * [[File:Christianright.png]] Steven Crowder - Overall, a massive pussy.


 * [[File:MagicPT.png]] Henry Kissinger - Pretty much a terrorist. I really hope you get what's coming to you one day.


 * [[File:Chilib.png]] Milton Friedman - Lolbert. Go learn some basic economics.


 * [[File:RonPaul.png]] Ron Paul - Everything I despise neatly rapt up into one little package!


 * [[File:BoJo.png]] Boris Johnson - Not only was brexit very cringe, your leadership in general is just terrible.


 * [[File:FIDESZ.png]] Viktor Orbán - You are destroying your own country.


 * [[File:Mesocon.png]] Dennis Prager - Founder of Prageru, enough said.


 * [[File:GWB.png]] George W. Bush - War mongering imperialist and war criminal.


 * [[File:PiS.png]] Andrzej Duda - Another annoying ass Eurosceptic. Your party is a laughing stock. From its corruption, authoritarianism, nothing good I can say about it.


 * [[File:Plutocrat.png]] Elon Musk - You should be thrown in jail, and your monopoly broken up.


 * [[File:Plutocrat.png]] Jeff Bezos - Amazon should be broken up.


 * [[File:Plutocrat.png]] Mark Zuckerberg - We all know you're a lizard. Also fuck facebook and the metaverse.

Very Negative

 * [[File:Nazi.png]] Adolf Hitler - You destroyed germany and left it in ruins, the fact that anyone supports you just baffling. All of your modern day supporters are even more baffling, to take inspiration from someone who lost the biggest world war in history is an unimaginable L.


 * [[File:Polpot.png]] Pol Pot - You left Cambodia in ruins and were a genocidal maniac.


 * [[File:Fash.png]] Benito Mussolini - You left Italy in ruins after world war 2. Have fun in hell.


 * [[File:Baath.png]] Bashar Al Assad - Genocidal and incompetent. Although God, Syria, and Bashar is an absolute bop, why do authoritarian regimes always make the best songs?


 * [[File:Putin.png]] Vladimir Putin - I hope one way your despotic, corrupt rule comes to an end (and hopefully you get assassinated). Alexei Navalny is the future Russia needs. SLAVA UKRAINI!


 * [[File:Lukash.png]] Alexander Lukashenko - Cringe despot, I fully back the protests against the Byelorussia government. Hopefully one day your reign comes to an end and the Byelorussian people do not have to live under your tyranny.


 * [[File:XiJinpingThoughtf.png]] Xi Jinping - You've in a lot of ways ruined China and set it on a course for failure. Just to think there was some chance China could see a better future.


 * [[File:Mao.png]] Mao Zedong - You may have brought china out of the feudal system and gave women rights, but you were a totalitarian genocidal maniac who starved millions upon millions of his own people.


 * [[File:Stalin.png]] Joseph Stalin - You killed millions of your own people for quite literally no reason. Like, the worst of the worst.


 * [[File:Showa-kanmuri.png]] Hirohito - Rapist and Imperalist. I normally do not support the death penalty, but I can make an exception for you, which is what should've happened.


 * [[File:Altr.png]] Richard Spencer - One of the founders of the Alt-Right movement. Kys please.


 * [[File:Neonazi_ball.png]] Stonetoss - An open neo-nazi, need I say more?


 * [[File:PatPaleoCon.png]] Tucker Carlson - This dude is a closeted fascist.


 * [[File:AlexJ.png]] Alex Jones - You are actually fucking retarded.


 * [[File:Fuente.png]] Nick Fuentes - A Neo-Nazi. Fuck you.


 * [[File:Pinochet-hat.png]] Augusto Pinochet - Many of Chile's modern problems can be attributed to you! How about I throw you out of a helicopter.


 * [[File:Hoppef.png]] Hans-Hermann Hoppe - As if the retarded ancap larping wasn't enough, this "physical removal" stuff is just on another level of stupid.


 * [[File:Obj.png]] Ayn Rand - Worst thing Stalin did was let this bitch out of the USSR alive. Objectivism, more like, objectively shit.

Comments
- If you have any comments to make about my ideology or want to be added to user relations, make them here. And format the comment like this please. Melkor - Pretty cool profile, its really well made and you clearly put a lot of effort into it
 * - Can you add me?
 * - Alright, will do
 * - Thank you!

DragonRed Bashar Assad - Vladimir Putin Alexander Lukashenko Xi Jinping - Mao Zedong they are all great leaders. Ataturk did not commit genocide. How many times will I write? DragonRed he was a benevolent dictator.
 * - Ataturk is, but the rest are all dictatorial manaics.
 * - How many other funny jokes can you write?
 * - Ataturk wanted a democratic Turkey eventually.
 * - Mao was one of the most incompetent leaders of the 20th Century and it's crazy that he got away with it.

DragonRed There is no democracy in backward societies. In backward societies, democracy becomes nepotism, kinship, sectarianism. In backward societies, limited defensive democracy and a partially charitable and progressive dictatorship are required. He shouldn't vote for a low-intelligence primary school graduate. Everyone should have democracy in their own matter.
 * - I suggest you look up the society of the San people, they have their tribes run by a Consensus Democracy under a Ceremonial quasi-Monarchy. Okay they're tribes, but it's still a Democracy. But generally I think a Semi-Constitutional Monarchy might be the best system for most developing countries.

Alexei Navalny Volodymyr Zelenskyy Mikhail Gorbachev - Barrack Justin Trudeau-Donald Trump-Vaush McCarthy - Ronald Reagan Margaret Thatcher - Ben Shapiro - Steven Crowder - Henry Kissinger - Milton Friedman Boris Johnson George W. Bush is terrible people. '''Cringe anti-indigenist and pro-imperialist. So is American nationalism/patriotism regardless if you are a """Native""" citizen. Also state liberalism as your "troll" ideology is kinda cringe, and so is corporatism, centrism (especially), Modern social democracy, generic social-liberalism anti-anarchism, and while supporting Kurds you hate demcom despite being one of the most based ideologies and last best hopes of earth (even though I prefer individualist anarchism is still extremely based considering the circumstances) which is even more cringe.''' Yeah, this is just more cringe, I don't even want to debate this because it is just debating with a western liberal who says all the same generic pseudo-progressive talking points over and over and over and over again. Demcom is an opportunistic libtard ideology. It doesn't benefit anything. Anarchism does not work in any of its derivatives. Demcom ideology Stalin was a red fascist. Stalin was not a socialist. It is those who call themselves revolutionaries and those who play counter-revolutionaries. Stalin's mockery of socialism; who thinks he is a revolutionary, who dreams of establishing his own so-called democratic socialist revolution; counter-revolutionary oppurtunist ideology.
 * - How am I an interventionist who worships dictators? Haven’t you seen that they are joke ideologies? I am actually neutral on neoconservatism and interventionism.
 * - Maybe I misunderstood your ideology then, but you come off as quite hawkish for me. And your other comments on your page just kinda give off that.
 * - Also, there is no puritanism in Australia. I don't know what the hell you are talking about. For your comment on social authoritarianism: social fascism doesn't really exist, it is a fake term invented by tyrant Stalin to discredit social democratic parties.
 * - Oh I'm well aware social fascism doesn't exist it's more or less just a joke, and also, I'm talking about your attitudes to things like LGBT issues.
 * - Fair enough Ig.
 * - Michail Gorbachev liberated the Soviet Union and Vaush is based, cope.
 * - When was I ever pro-colonialism? I explicitly stated that I believed in self-determination of oppressed people's in the world fighting against authoritarian states. And the kurds for me are a bit mixed but I do in-general support them, even though I don't like some of the stuff that goes on there, just not too educated on the situation as a whole so. And yeah, I like corporatism and modern social democracy, which are both based.

You are waging war against authoritarian states in the world. But your own state intervenes in other countries and you applaud people's destruction of their country and exploitation of resources?Matteel '''***Then again, isn't that also everyone who disagrees with you? Also the stuff not in bold was NOT said by me. I have no idea who said it.''' - Add me? - add me
 * - What are you talking about, did you just skip the part of my page were I was protesting US foreign intervention policy?
 * - What a load of waffles. AnAnonboi is a typical SJW type Neo-Marxist brainlet.
 * - Sure thing.
 * - Alright.

- Update relations with me? '''I love how most liberals users here have ideologies that greatly align with neo-imperialism and always say how savage and backward it is for the colonized to want to have a nation and protect it from outside (imperialist) threats and even spread that hate towards more radical left-wingers, left-nationalist and alt-globalist forces alongside always try to rebrand their own liberal world order under a veneer of "progress" yet at the end of the day are always white privledged first-worlders who have no idea how their western nations systems like NATO or even the UN are intentionally made to keep the smaller countries down and are ruled by only the major (western) super powers. TLDR: COPE LIBERAL! YOU MAKE ME SICK IDENTIFYING WITH THAT IMPERIALISM WITH A MASK BS! LEFT-WING/POST-LEFT/ANARCHIST ANTI-COLONIAL HOMIES WHERE YOU AT?'''
 * - What am I supposed to be coping over? Your longwinded wall of texts that you spew out? Also, the united states contributes the most to foreign aid than any other country in the world. And the UN is similar as well, so what you're saying is wrong.
 * What you are saying is just imperialist cringe so I won't delve into it further, but with that aside I must say with that aside I must say you are a based straight who openly states he faps to catboys, femboys and twinks... I don't even know how that is even possible but it is really fucking epic and you have my full respect in that regard. 
 * - "I cannot prove you wrong so I'm not going to try to". Alright, thanks for that free victory. It's just really funny what you're saying. As I label myself as anti-colonial and anti-imperialist, you think everything is imperialism.
 * Okay... Now you're just strawmanning my points to make it seem like just because I see debating you as pointless, that I have no reasons to feel that way other than "disagree with me = silence them at all costs"
 * - You are deliberately not responding to my points because you know you cannot respond lol. Keep going on your incoherent "anti-imperialist" rants. I love to listen to it.
 * - you started the straw manning first as you called my old ideology (Retroliberalism) Cypto-State Liberal which I acknowledge my old ideology was a tad too authoritarian and too economically right was by no means state liberalism
 * Okay, both of you are coping and are swarming me because I was critiquing your ideologies. And no, I absolutely will defend my points that debating with you two is pointless. Just agree to disagree and move on already. I don't want this section to degrade into another mucho-texto war

A wall of text is something that is frowned upon in most, actually virtually all Internet societies, including forums, chat boards, and Uncyclopedia. You should not make walls of text because it can get you banned anywhere unless it is a place that encourages walls of text. I highly doubt any place does support something so irritating and annoying, but anything can exist, but not really because unless you are in heaven then that can happen. But no one actually knows that was just a hypothesis, a lame one that is. Actually not really lame. You can create a wall of text supporting site, but you would be hated if you do that, so do not. But you can if you like, but I discourage that. Now on to the actual information of walls of texts. The wall of text was invented when the Internet was invented, but actually it was slow at that time. So whenever it became fast. But there would need to be some free or not free community for people, and that community would be able to have walls of text. But that community probably wouldn't have actually invented the wall of text. So basically, no one except God and Al Gore knows when or where or how the wall of text existed/was invented. Noobs probably invented, but probably not. Who knows. Walls of texts are usually filled with a lot of useless information and junk. Information and junk can be the same, but only if the information is junk or the junk is information. But who cares. The information/junk inside a wall of text are usually related to wherever the wall of text is located, but the best walls of text, which are actually the most irritating, most eye-bleeding ones, are completely random. Walls of text usually make the reader asplode or have their eyes bleed and fall out of their sockets. A number of people can stand it, but not read them. Actually some people can stand and read them. Those people do not have short attention spans. These are boring and patient people who have no life or have all the time in their hands, which are the same, but not really. The punishment of what making walls of text varies of the strictness of the community. But it doesn't really matter. Nobody cares. Walls of texts should be free of links, different font colors, strange characters, which are those other symbols used in society, and capital letters because it ruins the whole purpose of the infamy of walls of texts. It makes them look fucking dumb and weird. Walls of texts are obviously free of huge spaces and outstanding things like capital letters. Of course, paragraphs should never be in a wall of text. Walls of text are known to create nausea, confusion, head explosion, and others. The others being something I can not think of either because I am lazy or if I do not feel like it or I can not actually think of anything. Like what the fuck? That was a rhetorical question right there. What the fuck? You are actually not requesting a satisfactory answer, you just say that because you try to be funny or you feel like it or if you are pissed off. You must get a proper bitch-slapping to stop making walls of text, but if you are weird then that doesn't apply to you. Walls of text are defeated by deleting them or splitting them into paragraphs. But who cares. The information/junk inside a wall of text are usually related to wherever the wall of text is located, but the best walls of text, which are actually the most irritating, most eye-bleeding ones, are completely random. Walls of text usually make the reader asplode or have their eyes bleed and fall out of their sockets. A number of people can stand it, but not read them. Actually some people can stand and read them. Those people do not have short attention spans. These are boring and patient people who have no life or have all the time in their hands, which are the same, but not really. The punishment of what making walls of text varies of the strictness of the community. But it doesn't really matter. Nobody cares. Walls of texts should be free of links, different font colors, strange characters, which are those other symbols used in society, and capital letters because it ruins the whole purpose of the infamy of walls of texts. It makes them look fucking dumb and weird. Walls of texts are obviously free of huge spaces and outstanding things like capital letters. Of course, paragraphs should never be in a wall of text. Walls of text are known to create nausea, confusion, head explosion, and others. The others being something I can not think of either because I am lazy or if I do not feel like it or I can not actually think of anything. Like what the fuck? That was a rhetorical question right there. What the fuck? You are actually not requesting a satisfactory answer, you just say that because you try to be funny or you feel like it or if you are pissed off. You must get a proper bitch-slapping to stop making walls of text, but if you are weird then that doesn't apply to you. Walls of text are defeated by deleting them or splitting them into paragraphs. Or some other things that would work but will take hours to think of. People are considered a nuisance if they create walls of text. This might be the end. If you hope this is the end, I am not sure. But if I was not sure then I wouldn't be talking. I should know. Or should I? The best way to make a better and good wall of text is to copy and paste what you previously typed or write. Hey, that reminds me. Wall of text aren't always on the internet! They could be anywhere that is able to produce symbols. D'oh. A wall of text is something that is frowned upon in most, actually virtually all Internet societies, including forums, chat boards, and Uncyclopedia. You should not make walls of text because it can get you banned anywhere unless it is a place that encourages walls of text. I highly doubt any place does support something so irritating and annoying, but anything can exist, but not really because unless you are in heaven then that can happen. Or some other things that would work but will take hours to think of. People are considered a nuisance if they create walls of text. This might be the end. If you hope this is the end, I am not sure. But if I was not sure then I wouldn't be talking. I should know. Or should I? The best way to make a better and good wall of text is to copy and paste what you previously typed or write. Hey, that reminds me. Walls of text aren't always on the internet! They could be anywhere that is able to produce symbols. D'oh. A wall of text is something that is frowned upon in most, actually virtually all Internet societies, including forums, chat boards, and Uncyclopedia. You should not make walls of text because it can get you banned anywhere unless it is a place that encourages walls of text. I highly doubt any place does support something so irritating and annoying, but anything can exist, but not really because unless you are in heaven then that can happen. But no one actually knows that was just a hypothesis, a lame one that is. Actually not really lame. You can created a wall of text supporting site, but you would be hated if you do that, so do not. But you can if you like, but I discourage that. Now on to the actual information of walls of texts. The wall of text was invented when the Internet was invented, but actually it was slow at that time. So whenever it became fast. But there would need to be some free or not free community for people, and that community would be able to have walls of text. But that community probably wouldn't have actually invented the wall of text. So basically, no one except God and Al Gore knows when or where or how the wall of text existed/was invented. Noobs probably invented, but probably not. Who knows. Walls of texts are usually filled with a lot of useless information and junk. Information and junk can be the same, but only if the information is junk or the junk is information. But who cares. The information/junk inside a wall of text are usually related to wherever the wall of text is located, but the best walls of text, which are actually the most irritating, most eye-bleeding ones, are completely random. Walls of text usually make the reader asplode or have their eyes bleed and fall out of their sockets. A number of people can stand it, but not read them. Actually some people can stand and read them. Those people do not have short attention spans. These are boring and patient people who have no life or have all the time in their hands, which are the same, but not really. The punishment of what making walls of text varies of the strictness of the community. But it doesn't really matter. Nobody cares. Walls of texts should be free of links, different font colors, strange characters, which are those other symbols used in society, and capital letters because it ruins the whole purpose of the infamy of walls of texts. It makes them look fucking dumb and weird and dumb. Walls of texts are obviously free of huge spaces and outstanding things like capital letters. Of course, paragraphs should never be in a wall of text. Walls of text are known to create nausea, confusion, head explosion, and others. The others being something I can not think of either because I am lazy or if I do not feel like it or I can not actually think of anything. Like what the fuck? That was a rhetorical question right there. What the fuck? You are actually not requesting a satisfactory answer, you just say that because you try to be funny or you feel like it or if you are pissed off. Now I just copied and pasted part of this huge wall of text, which is actually not. Wait what? Nice right? Ba boom a rhetorical question right there. Is this the end for the sanity of your eyes? What the fuck did you actually read up to here? Or did you skip to near the end and read this? Either way, you fail in life. Just kidding. Or was I? Oh well.
 * - Well then maybe you shouldn't be leaving your massive wall of texts as a coping mechanism then as they not intelligently written.
 * - Unfortunally for you it's too late:

NO! DragonRed nameless man who are you who are you Am m please update relations ty
 * - You know what I'm keeping that because it's funny. And also, that would be for the best because everything you say is incredibly soy.
 * - Done

- I have readded you. Readd me please? The person who you started a conspiracy over - plez update relations - Please update relations. - Do you play any musical instruments or such? Ronzipot - You are fairly based. Also add me plz '''Yeah sorry, your recent edits are cringe comparing anime drawings of moe characters to literal child abuse and exploitation, and before you go off on "a drawing of what" GTA Is a game of what? A greatly false representation of "reality" is not in any way comparable to committing literal crimes against humanity. With that aside, you do know that your "points" actually just makes pedophilia seem as something that is just "normal" because you are comparing their literal crimes against humanity to something as minimal and trivial as a person who reads pretty much ANY hentai doujin. Agree to disagree, call me any name you want from the book. I just don't see your ideas as genuine in fighting actual pedos when you have to bring anime.''' To put this comment to a close, regarding your question at the end of your comment, it is because Moe Anime Girls are not actual children, nor are they meant to reflect such by their very design. Their "moe" behavior is meant to represent an idealized and fake representation of cutesy behavior and innocence which said consumers identify themselves with rather than to represent actual children who are basically amoral and act in ways that are (to put it lightly) ass-holey. If you can't tell the difference between a real child and a thousand-year-old 2-D moe dragon with eyes the size of tangerines and act in ways that are completely unlike real children then I think you are the one with the problem. to how you have absolutely no evidence to support anything you say against me or whatever fictional fetish you hate on, and how your a bad person for a victimless crime, while you actively support the United States which is well known to actively be putting people in power or whose most powerful leaders have had worked closely with people like Jeffrey Epstein to do god knows what. Then I will point that out, how you are the one doing real damage to children by sliding these many atrocities under the rug to instead throw fits about 17.9 year old anime girls as being the greatest threat to child safety in the modern day. That is something I can't defend. Your "humanitarian aid" usually also only applies to allies of the US or who bend their knee to the US so that's also BS. \
 * - added
 * - Alright i'll do that
 * - Alright, i'll update relations here sometime tomorrow.
 * - No, never have been interested in musical instruments of any kind.
 * - Add me
 * - Alright. Will do.
 * - Y'know, i was not expecting AnaAnonBoi to come out as a lolicon, but i'm definetly not surprised, also its really great how you threw out all the parroted npc arguments all at once lmao
 * Nice strawman, playing devil's advocate isn't nor ever should be compared to being such. Even if I was, this is pure ad-hominem and ignores my points as well as how you are attacking me because you clearly don't like me and thus WANT to slander me with such things to strawman me and delegitimize my points and to further justify your own sense of being "right". Sorry if me being critical on attacking moe anime characters would actually help fight real child abuse. Something which as a victim of, absolutely despises in all of its forms. But I guess according to you my devil's advocate argument automatically makes me whatever you say I am and therefore makes me a BAD PERSON whose points are entirely invalid.
 * - I just thought it was funny
 * Sorry, but slander for the sake of it in our political climate is not something I in any way find "funny". I am all for edgy jokes, but calling someone such a thing is really dangerous to not only me but to you as well. And besides, something tells me you have greater motives to go and call me such things and go off about how my points are "wrong" and "NPC" rather than just because "its just a joke"... Sorry, I just don't get how trying to "debunk" my points is in anyway can be taken as a joke
 * - Excuse me, but what the fuck am I reading right now? I'm just flat out confused if this is trolling or not.
 * I don't know how you can take my good-faithed points as "trolling" but regardless. If I was not mistaken you vandalized a far-right users page (who regardless, that guy was still indeed very cringe and was pretty much asking for it ofc) to make it look like he was a MAP alongside being a loli/shotacon. Which to me I kinda find pretty "eh" tbh because while it could be interpreted as a joke, you pretty much compared a liking towards anime drawings to unironic pedos and child abusers, when most of those individuals are just weird fetishy otakus whose entire interest is stuff on hentai doujins and aren't even comparable to the unspeakable evil that is pedos or 14-year-old far-right cringelords whose entire ideology is based on whatever was the most insane hoi4 sub ideology but taken seriously and uses it to excuses his shitty worldviews and makes it his entire personality.
 * - Dude, I'm sorry but, out of everything I've heard come out of your long winded paragraphs you spew out, this has to be the least intelligently written one I've seen. I'm just gonna pretend that you're not implying what I think you're implying. I don't know what to say, and I'm really unsure why you are trying to die on this hill. But, how does being attracted to kids not make you a pedo?
 * Sorry, but since you seem to be so butthurt by it, I am going to have another long-winded paragraph just for you [[File:Troll.png]] Anyways, you are clearly being bad-faith to call a person who doesn't necessarily agree with you on the status of moe anime characters akin to real child abuse as supporting literal pedo actions, I don't want to have this talk because I know you won't consider another perspective let alone consider changing your mind no matter what facts I bring or if I ask for what scientific basis your supposed "facts" come from. Your claims of me standing behind such stances being akin to "dying on a hill" is simply another word for standing for what you truly believe in and not giving up because of what others think regarding the status of fiction. Sorry if I don't see eye-to-eye on that because I just see it as harming any ability to really fight real pedos and puts the finger to people who have no relation to the real pieces of shit who do such heinous acts. Also, to say my paragraphs are basically "spewed out nonsense" [and how you vandalized my writing] shows it's pretty obvious you just don't like me when all I was saying was that I didn't agree with your comparisons between a hentai trope with literal unironic pedophilia. Call me whatever word in the book if you want, but I know that such claims are absolute slander. Especially when you are using such takes to attack me when your ideals have confirmed and direct connection towards the deaths of real people such as your support of NATO which has been well documented to have led to the deaths of numerous amounts of innocent men, women, and even children. If you want to claim I am the one putting kids in danger because I am playing devil's advocate towards the stance of anime drawings not being equivalent to real child abuse, then why are you not putting that same concern towards real-world situations that have and continue to directly cause the suffering deaths of countless amounts of REAL children? Maybe because it only matters wto you hen it is something you don't like or which political side you align with rather than the legitimate devastation it causes to real people. I am done with this conversation (unless you vandalize my page further then I will just remove it) because you are so bad-faith you can't even have a fact-based conversation about such topics without vandalizing my arguments to say things that I am not. I don't care if I am "spewing nonsense" to you, because having to stoop so low as to vandalize people is far worse in a debate based on rationality and common consensus.
 * - Well, firstly. I believe that pedophilia as a mental illness should be destigmatized (explicitly the mental illness, not the act you're thinking of) as it doesn't mean you're gonna be a child rapist, so those with said condition can actually seek help without their entire lives being destroyed with it. So, I don't see how enabling it is going to help anything, even if it isn't harming anyone. And those anime characters and designed like children so they are children, it doesn't matter if its fictional or not, it's still children. And, I'm really confused we even got to this point in the first place on a wiki about politics. Also, imagine making up the point that I vandalized what you said just to invalidate your comment just so you could do some meaningless "gotcha".
 * '''Firstly, yes, it is a "gotcha" to point out how you are being dishonest and unwilling to hold rational debate by vandalizing a person who disagrees with you and to paint them into some pro-pedo advocate. That is slander, and looks really bad for you, secondly, the term "Enabling" is just funny, especially when you are so dedicated to hate on a victimless crime with an unfounded "point" thirdly, I already told you it looks nothing like a child and you completely glossed over that. What child is a hyper-moe anime waifu with eyes the size of tangerines? And fourth, As I said before, you completely ignore that your argument is the same violent-videogames, anti-furry, and anti-porn, fetish, guro etc. activists use towards "enabling" violent or other "degenerate" behaviors despite there being absolutely no evidence on that. If you want to make such claims give scientifically validated studies, the burden of proof is on YOU to confirm... NOT me... Otherwise I would be far more respectful your point if you were consistent in your argument rather than shying away from how your argument is legit no different from hating on hyper-realistic violence in games. After all you kill innocent civilians in games like hatred, GTA or postal to where it's expected and made light of, yet said gamers have absolutely no proof it makes them "more violent" whatever fear-mongering propaganda that is. And finally you also completely glossed over my most important point, that why are you throwing stones from a glass house when you attack hypothetical child abuse (or at least serves as a gateway to child abuse) with no scientific backing rather than the well documented abuse of actual children by groups you openly defend such as NATO? As I said you're inconsistent with your views because it really isn't about "fighting pedophilia" or "doing what is truly right", it seems clear to me you just don't like it because it is a really taboo fetish which I agree with, but that doesn't make it evil or those people who enjoy such things "pedos" and only gives more ammo to the real pedos who make it seem like anything you do that's outside of the norm makes you a pedo and thus their actions are excusable. I didn't WANT to have to do this, but when you throw such slanderous lies to where you resort to calling me a "pedo-defender" and vandalizes me over it based clearly on your distaste towards a taboo fetish, rather than an actual desire to protect kids, in places where they actually face abuse (such as groups by NATO) I get fairly upset.'''
 * - LMAO. Ok, let's just ignore all the humanitarian work the United States has contributed too, and the peace these alliances have created (which would save millions of deaths). And, they are designed like Children, what you're saying isn't comparable as I'm not parroting anti-porn arguments, because I think they are retarded. You're just grasping for straws as a way to justify whatever weird shit you're into, in that case, I don't even wanna know. And, once again, I never vandalized what you've said, stop saying that, lying in an argument is an emission of guilt.
 * "The United States has ensured peace across the world" that logic is simply absurd if you did even a bit of google searching. The US is one of (if not the) the greatest leaders in establishing right-wing dictatorships against democracies in all of history. You go off about how I am "grasping at straws" yet it isn't really grasping at straws if I am pointing out your obvious hypocrisy
 * - Look, this is just flat out the most retarded argument I've gotten into in this wiki, like I'm so lost for words right now. And I really cannot be fucked to argue about US aid and its allies. So, liking children at the end of the day is pedophilla, no ends, ands, or butts, and it is immoral to do that. Seeing as you don't even want good faith arguing by making up points just to slander my case, this is just going to continue going back and fourth with no conclusion.
 * When you have to ignore all my points and act like I am being retarded when you continually ignore how I keep telling you that you have no evidence to any such claims and how you play dumb to my points such as the fact you've been vandalizing people, which even the mods know about. Then for once I agree, this debate is pointless and none of us are going to go anywhere so why bother.


 * [[File:Silasf.png]] Silas: How did you become a patriot/nationalist? That would probably be the most unexpected ideology change for you.
 * - Well, I genuinely do like the West, so I thought that patriotism was the most logical to adopt. Still cosmopolitan in my views if you couldn't tell, just think that it isn't a bad idea to at least adopt some form of pride. Along with just coming to the realization that multiculturalism doesn't work the best with social democracy, and that Interculturalism would be a better fit. Looking at the nordic countries and how the center-left parties have stayed in power, this has a role to play, so I thought adopting that would just make logical sense. I honestly just feel like you're arguing just to be contrarian to me.

- hey update relations also what your biggest issue with my ideology
 * - Alright. And the biggest issues would have to be south Floridian separatism, since I'm very much not keen on state independence. As well as the socialism bit, as I'm still economically capitalist. Other than that, there's not much to complain about.
 * - I have sent request to you longtime ago,pls see your notification and add me.
 * - Alright, will do.
 * - What do you think about [[FIle:PanBrit.png]] ?
 * - Pretty based, but tone down the ethnocentrism.
 * Userwiki:Marsvner - dude I have to tell you that in a revisionist and repressive state like China we gotta implement a brand new revolutionary culture to bash the damn old establishment and its residue even after revolution in favor of buliding an democratic and socialist state.It's obvious we need to be revolutionary progressive to bash the old patriachy,repressive confucian culture and bureaucraticism that may emerge again.In your country things are more complicated that you may not need to be culturally revolutionary in current.So pls not blame me for taking progressivism too far😣
 * [[File:Silasf.png]] Silas: Considering the amount of damage the original Cultural Revolution did to China, I don't think having a second one would work out very well.

- Literal ideology hoarder lmfaoooooo (also add me )


 * - add me