UserWiki:Matteel

Hello, and welcome to my page! My ideology is, the self-insert of the user  Matteel. Mattism is an individualist ideology that is  civically libertarian,  democratic,  culturally reformist, economically  center-left, militarily  non-Interventionist,  left-nationalist, and diplomatically  internationalist.

[[File:Consti.png]] Introduction [[File:Consti.png]]
Matteel has been a lurker on the subreddit ever since 2021 and a user of this wiki since the old one got shut down (I hadn't made an account at the time), and around summer started being active on it. I've contributed to both r/polcompball and to r/polcompballanarchy and I'm flaired as Social Democracy on the offical subreddit.

Shit that will always remain the same about my beliefs even if I go apolitical

 * A mixed/social market economy is good, and welfare is based.
 * Socialism and capitalism are the same slave systems, corporatism is a better alternative to both capitalism and socialism.
 * The state is mid to cringe, should either be liberal or libertarian because authority sucks.
 * Democracy is good
 * Feminism is misunderstood and not when women have more rights than men or whatever, and gender equality is based. But, modern day feminism in the United States only serves the neolibtard establishment. I support feminism because I see many anti-feminists as people who are just apart of incel culture and hate women, but I'm anti-liberal feminism.
 * Neoliberalism is shit
 * Abortion rights are cool and should be constitutionally protected
 * People's sexualities are of no concern to me, so Idgaf about gay people. So long as they don't bug me, they can do what they want.
 * There are only two genders, male and female. But trans people are real and shouldn't be attacked for existing. They should have their rights legally recognized.
 * Modern day progressivism is ok, and better than modern day conservativism
 * Political correctness and identity politics are gay, and woke culture is full of authoritarian moralists who want us to think and act the same as them. These people want to suppress my individualism. I'm deeply opposed to postmodernism
 * Transgression as praxis is based.
 * Morality is subjective
 * Ease legal immigration, but strictly prohibit illegal immigration. Although, the barbaric treatment of illegal immigrants is cringe.
 * Israel is the most preferable state in the Middle East compared to its surrounding neighbors, but the constant violating of international law and apartheid aren't cool. I would prefer a post-Zionist state
 * Sanders is one of the only good candidates in our political climate, although his populist rhetoric is cringe for me and he isn't perfect obviously
 * Both the republican and democratic parties are the same thing. Although the democratic party is the lesser evil, more specifically, left-democrats, are the best political organization to exist in our current political climate.
 * International co-operation is fine, but globalism isn't. And loving your country is good so long as it doesn't devolve into blind nation first chauvinism
 * Multiculturalism and globalism are bad. Anti-nationalists are pathetic national traitors who should kill themselves and be born in a different country
 * Fuck the CCP, free Hong Kong and Taiwan is the legitimate China. Although attacking mainland Chinese people for speaking mandarin and just being Chinese is gay
 * Enjoying yourself (hedonism) is good
 * I'll let you enjoy what you're doing so long as you let me enjoy what I do. People should be able to do whatever they want so long as its not harming others
 * Religion is dumb and only suppresses my individualism. Although, edgy atheists who attack people for being religious and nothing else and act like they're hot shit because they don't believe in something anyone with a brain could've figured out didn't exist are equally cringe as religious extremists
 * All political edgelords who worship brutal dictators like Hitler or Stalin are edgy privileged middle class teenagers who've never faced a single hardship in their entire life and should go outside and make some friends outside of the internet to see how the real world actually works to make them realize that they wouldn't last a single second in any societies they idealize

Political affiliations
Democratic Party
 * [[File:Dem-CPC.png]] Congressional Progressive Caucus

People I Support
Lucas Kunce (I've donated a couple of dollars towards his political campaign)

Bernie Sanders (Same thing above)

[[File:Philosophy.png]] Philosophy [[File:Philosophy.png]]

 * -| Metaphysics =

Metaphysics
My metaphysical view of the world subscribes to materialistic monism with reductive metaphysical determinist epistemology. So, my metaphysical view could be described as reductive materialistic determinism. This basically means that materialistic elements have determined everything in the universe, and everything can be reduced down to this. Being a materialistic metaphysical worldview, this rejects anything that is idealistic or esoteric, since it is specifically grounded in the physical world, and nothing outside the physical world. We are not what we are because of our ideals, but because of the material world around us has made us what we are.
 * -| Monism =

Monism
My monistic view of the world subscribes to a materialistic monism, I believe that the material world is the primary, and only consciousness that arises through the interaction with the physical world, all of the world's objects are composed of a single element. Everything can be explained by reducible to molecular arrangements in our universe with this worldview.
 * -| Ontology =

Ontology
I subscribe to a universalist ontology, I believe my ideological components have universal value and applicability, so I naturally try to apply this through international co-operation. This is were my pro-globalization stances come from, as I believe it's important to uphold these values not only in my particular area, but the world as well, since it is a universal theory. I also incorporate reductive physicalism into my ontology, which means that everything in the world can be reduced down entirely to physical properties, which goes along with my metaphysical and monistic view of the world.
 * -| Epistemology =

Epistemology
I am a social constructivist, it is important to look at societal factors and the upbringing of individuals for determining the behavior of said individuals, as "inherent traits" in people do not exist, this reasoning should be used when observing the behavior and nature of society at large to address the needs of people in said society. This view of society also coincides with my rationale outlook, itself from liberal thought that stems from the enlightenment, I believe that reason is the chief source of human knowledge, and is necessary for reasonable decision making.
 * -| Morality =

Morality
I am a moralist, I believe its important to use morality to gauge in determining from what is right and wrong. My moral ethics come from consequentialism, an ethical theory stating that actions should be looked through the lens of the consequences of one's actions. However, pure consequentialism itself is flawed, as one's intentions should also be accounted for as well. This is were my morality branches off from consequentialism to utilitarianism, which states that actions should be judged based on how much harm and good they cause to other people (otherwise known as utility an action causes). This could describe my welfare ethics, as welfare has shown to create happy populations free from things like poverty, this moral outlook considers the collective good of society as a whole. Along with my support for services like Abortion, as I believe the government has no right to ban such services from this outlook, this would apply for things like pornography and other entertainment services. I believe these ethics have universal value, and are objective. Which is why I am a moral universalist as well, if something causes pain or suffering towards individuals, then it is morally wrong, but if it creates happiness, then it is morally good. Other liberal values such as democracy and equality under the law could also be considered universal values as well, since these have created the happiest populations with the most extensive civil liberties.
 * -| Religious =

Religious
Religion is a vague concept that separates the individual from their own self-interests and desires and enslaves you to the desires of some "higher being", with my self-interests coming first, I naturally reject all forms of spiritual beliefs as having any ground in reality, and the idea of God as being anything more than a myth that doesn't exist.


 * -| Political =

Political
I subscribe to the idea of meta-modernism, which is a collection of beliefs from both modernism and post-modernism. I view the post-modern attitudes of our current society as undesirable because of the relativism caused by it, as it abandons the universal values of liberalism and promotes particularism, so I naturally think these attitudes should replace our relativistic postmodern attitudes in the future. I also identify with cosmopolitan values, such as global responsibility, economic justice, and environmental justice, but I disagree with the idea its ideals like cultural cosmopolitanism and other specific things, but I think of myself as a citizen of the world and my country.


 * -| Ethics =

Ethics
I am an ethical individualist, I believe it is normal for people to act within their own self-interests and not in the interests of others. I am personally owed nothing to you, and you are owed nothing to me, and to expect people to ow each other anything is immoral and unethical. I live for myself and myself alone. Your hypothetical society doesn't know what's best for me, and to pretend that my hypothetical society would be best for you would be ignorant as well. I only know what's best for me, I want to enjoy myself and live life how I want to while I'm still personally alive, I don't want to live for others if I don't have to. Fuck your god, authoritarianism, dogma, feelings, and you :3 *blushes* idealism. No gods, no masters.

I'm also opposed to the modern day left and right for these reasons, as, they take themselves too seriously and try to silence people's ideas who don't follow their specific views on their ideal utopic society. God has been substituted with politics in our postmodern society, and it quite frankly tires me. Just don't tell me how to live my life and I won't tell you how to live yours, and then we can get along. With this, additionally, I'm also opposed to pessimism and the idea that there's no inherent meaning in life, as life doesn't have meaning itself, that doesn't mean the future is pointless and that there's no point in living, so I see nihilism as a foolish philosophy for this reason.

I view shock humor as a good way to expose the fragileness that is both the modern day left and right for these reasons, things like ironic racism, sexism, anti-semitism, homophobia are welcomed as a way to expose the absurdity of both sides. This form of transgression could be considered a form of praxis. Of course I'm not actually racist, anti-semitic, misogynistic, or whatever mental gymnastics some of you guys can pull, I harbor no ill will towards anyone I make jokes about, the idea that hate speech means being hateful towards the people themselves is dumb.

This individualist view of the world also coincides with my moral hedonism, I believe it's important to live life pleasurably and do what personally makes me happy, this is largely because of my ADHD, hedonism has been one of the core pillars of my philosophy because of my impulsiveness as a person, it's always has been hard for me to focus on things that haven't been my own immediate material desires (which has also contributed to said materialistic view of the world that has resulted in my irreligiosity throughout my entire life up until 2017) for this reason. Now, everything we do could be argued as being hedonistic, as we do it to increase pleasure and decrease pain, but I'm more specifically talking about sensual desires if that wasn't obvious, like eating junk food or sugary drinks. And while this is applicable, I'm even more specifically talking about sexual pleasure. I'll leave it at that because you can probably imagine what comes after that I don't need to go into any specific details, because this would get very explicit very quickly and that's not what this page is about, I don't have anything to naturally hide anyways (I'm actually very serious I have very vanilla tastes, and I'm also not a closeted homosexual either like some have claimed, as what I watch would say otherwise).
 * -| Praxis =

Praxis
Being a populist, I see populism is a good way to achieve political power. So, I would incorporate populist heretic for political praxis. However, the creator of the page personally disagrees with populism to a certain extent, and many populist leaders in history have failed on their promises and actually just ended up serving the elite themselves, he views it as a good way to achieve his objectives. He combines these views with political realism seeing the best way to make change is through a pragmatic approach. As, while idealism is to an extent, necessary, you have to do things that go against your own ideas to inspire change. Even if it means compromising on your own ideals, it's better to have some of the change you wanted, compare to having nothing at all. And as such, harm reduction is very much necessary to achieve change.

Main Influences
Epicurus (341BC-270BC) Franklin D. Roosevelt (1882-1945) Theodore Roosevelt (1858-1919) Al Gore (1948) Marquis de Sade (1740-1814) John Locke (1632-1704) Albert Einstein (1879-1955) Mikhail Gorbachev (1931) Barack Obama (1961) Edward Snowden (1983) Julian Assange (1971) Ed Miliband (1969) Mette Frederiksen (1977) Huey Long (1893-1935) Lucas Kunce (1982) Andrés Manuel López Obrador (1953) Mizuho Fukushima (1955) Alexei Navalny (1976) Clement Attlee (1883 - 1967) Olof Palme (1927-1986) Sviatlana Tsikhanouskaya (1982) Roman Albertovich Abalin (1998) Joseph Stiglitz (1943) George Orwell (1903-1950) Martin Luther King Jr. (1929-1968) John Stuart Mill (1806-1873) Joseph Lancaster (?) John Maynard Keynes (1883-1946) Greg Guevara (1997) Bernie Sanders (1941) Ian Kochinski (1994) Petter Vallentyne (1952) Mustafa Kemal Ataturk (1881 - 1938) Jeremy Corbyn (1949) Elizabeth Warren (1949) Hillel Steiner (1942) Rick Falkvinge (1972) June Nicole Lapine (1991) Joshua Wong (1996) Agnes Chow (1996) Leung Kwok-hung (1956) Nathan Law (1993)

Personality + Stylistic Notes
My ideology is naturally reflective of the person who adopts that, being me. He loves playing hoi4 and in particular the submod TNO, although he talks about some submods for the game sometimes. He's noted for sticking with small group of friends, making and ending friendships here and there, and talking about irrelevant shit with them. He's very contempt with this model, not preferring to make longterm friendships but also not preferring to burn bridges immediately. He's also noted for getting into fights with the far-right on the internet sometimes. He gets visibly annoyed when anything questions his individualism, and complains about the modern day leftism and rightism, and just in-general his political situation.

History
It all started back in the summer of 2016, when he was browsing youtube and got recommend a video titled "Alternate future of the world" by a channel called Romanian Mapping, which featured aforementioned balls. This peaked his interest and quickly became one of his favorite interests, which served his my entry to the polandball fandom. Around in summer 2017 I got recommended a video by a content creator named "ISorrowProductions", which served as his entry to strategy games and Hearts of Iron 4, to which I bought back in November of 2017, and would revitalize my interest in the polandball fandom as those two are deeply connected (obviously).

I stopped watching mapping content back in early 2018 because the content was getting pretty stale, but I still liked Country balls and its fandom, but because of this sudden loss of interest in mapping content, I became less active in watching Polandball related content (although I still liked creators like ISP and Alex The Rambler). Around 2020, I got recommended a video called "The political compass rap" by a content creator known as "Jreg" (which many of you here most definitely know) by a friend in this private discord server that I no longer associate with, due the friend in question having been accused of doing so really bad things (nothing illegal, just being a general douche to others I associated with).

After I got recommended this video by my friend, this was the moment I got introduced into politics into any real capacity that actually interested me (although I never liked r/politicalcompassmemes because I saw it as a really politically illiterate subreddit). This same video and memes related to the political compass would serve as my entry into the polcompball fandom, I would quietly lurk around the subreddit back in early 2021. He created his new reddit account back in 2021 and started using it mid summer, however, he never used his old 2017 reddit account due to him post a lot of admittedly cringe stuff he never wants anyone to see.

He hasn't been active in any sort of discord related servers in this community due to him having lost most of his interest in discord after the events that happened, but he has been active in a couple offshoot communities related to political tests. However, he still lurks on discord with his friends which is how he is still in contact with them, but none of which are related to this community, but just politics and gaming in general. It was in similarly politically related servers that he had gotten into a lot of heated arguments with far-right groups and conservatives that caused him double down on his own progressive ideals. But, outside of these incidents, Ihas remained mostly drama free outside of political communities. And, has even befriended one of his old friends I used to talk to from 2019. So, I'm sure of my own political positions and will not change them any time soon.

Pages I've made contributions towards

 * [[File:Socdem.png]] Social Democracy
 * [[File:Necon.png]] Neoconservatism
 * [[File:Dem.png]] Democracy
 * [[File:World.png]] Globalism
 * [[File:Protect.png]] Protectionism
 * [[File:Modnat.png]] Patriotism
 * [[File:Thar.png]] Anti-Authoritarianism
 * [[File:Lpop.png]] Left-Wing Populism
 * [[File:Rpop-tinfoilhat.png]] Right-Wing Populism
 * [[File:Cdem.png]] Christian Democracy
 * [[File:Marxfem.png]] Marxist Feminism
 * [[File:Lib.png]] Liberalism

[[File:Scientocracy Small.png]] Evidence-Based Policy [[File:Scientocracy Small.png]]
American Social Democracy advocates for evidence based policy, which are public policy decisions that are informed by the  scientific method of. He sees the rise of anti-intellectualism coming from both of the groups in the political debate to suit their ideological needs as being destructive for our political discourse, things like  and other anti-intellectual movements that are unscientific should be fought back against, he supports  modernist principles.

[[File:FeministPhilosophy.png]] Sex Education [[File:FeministPhilosophy.png]]
American Social Democracy is in favor of teaching sex education, as it has served for being a vital way in combatting teenage pregnancies, STDs, HIV, and other sexually transmitted diseases. Many lives are ruined by something that could've been easily prevented if these topics were taught. On the federal level, we should educate children on everything that includes: basic biology,, and other things relating to these topics for harm reduction.

[[File:World.png]] Global Economy [[File:World.png]]
American Social Democracy isn't against the notion of a global economy, but is opposed to the  current global economy that benefits massive corporations by allowing them to offshore wealth, dodge taxes, disregard environmental law, and ect. So, he believes that the global economy can be reshaped to benefit the many instead of the corporate elites. With things like universal tax codes, fair-trade, and other measures I have mentioned, can trap the wealth of corporate conglomerates, which then can be effectively redistributed under this new global economic system.

Apolitical period
(2003 - 2012) Apolitical Childhood Period

The title says it all, I knew nothing about politics at this time because I was a child. None of us start political. So, there's nothing of noteworthy to be said here.'

/ (2012 - 2013) Apolitical Social Liberalism Period

The closest thing I had to any coherent political beliefs as a child was being against the current Republican nominee during the 2012 election, mostly influenced by my parents who were pretty liberal for their own views back in the day. Keep in mind, my grasp on politics was next to none. But I knew just a little bit, mostly from my parents. I was still apolitical as I lost all of my interest in politics after the election happened.

/ (Mid 2013) Monarchist Larp Period

I was larping as a Monarchist for the summer of 2013, I didn't legitimately believe in Monarchy as a form of government, I just thought it was funny.

/ (2013 - 2014) Homophobic Period

This part was the most socially conservative bit of my political journey, I was brainwashed by some group of people at school who I hung out with to hate Gay people. This was because homophobia was relevantly common back then and i was an easily impressionable kid, you can't really blame me.

// (2014 - 2016) Apolitical Progressive Conservative Social Liberalism Period

It was around this bit when I chilled out with some of my beliefs. As I was exceptionally childish and an easily influenceable person due to how little I knew at the time. Once I got out of that environment, I dropped my beliefs as I held no real hatred of LGBT individuals. So, the beliefs around this time were probably a progressive conservative social liberal. As, I still held some of my previous views from my parents. But, I was skeptical of the T part of the LGBT community. As, even my family was who was relevantly progressive about this issue was, which influenced my opinion. But, thought that abortion rights were cool and didn't see anything morally wrong with it.

Illiterate Political period
/ (Early 2016) Entering 2016

It was around the beginning of 2016 that I truly got the feel for politics, and began to understand more and more of our political climate as I grew up. With all of this, I still disliked mainstream news as it was too confusing for me to keep up with, so I still was relevantly confused about my politics for this period entering 2016, as I only grounded my political beliefs based on a few I had held previously without much insight to our political climate. But, because I didn't outright reject politics at this time, I would say I wasn't outright apolitical, as much as I just illiterate.

/ (Mid 2016) The 2016 Presidential Election, Part 1

The 2016 President election is were it all started. It was around when the election was beginning I looked into both of main nominees of Trump and Hillary, which I disliked both of them, seeing them as twofaced morons that were unlikable, as was the general opinion of both of these candidates by the American public. Although, I still had very little conception of the positions these candidates held themselves outside of what my family told me. So, this part was heavily influenced by my dad mainly.

// (2016 - 2017) The 2016 Presidential Election, Part 2

With my exploration of the political climate, I found myself adopting more views and agreeing with people like Bernie and other left-wing democrats, as I saw those candidates as likable compared to the previous candidates I encountered. Keep in-mind, I didn't know a whole lot about my political positions outside of just supporting things like abortion rights and some other relatively progressive social positions, which is why I call myself a progcon during this era because of my lack of knowledge off these cultural issues that technically made me such as I didn't fit into the cultural left or right. But, it would basically all go down hill from this point forwards after I would watch videos related to such topics. While I wasn't exactly socially conservative, I did get the wrong idea about some things entering into politics by watching the stereotypical "anti-sjw" videos due to not having the best grasp of the political climate at the time, I did watch a couple and it influenced my opinions on things like feminism. And, due to the heavy presence of "anti-sjw" topics related to some of these videos endorsing these candidates, it would further warp my views on such topics like feminism. This is were my political journey truly began, and oh boy, I wish I could honestly forget this point in my political journey.

Early Modern Period
///////(2017-2019) "Anti-SJW" Period

This part was just outright confusing looking back on it, my beliefs were understandability shaped by some of the videos I watched and some video games I played. And while I had no real stance on religion at the time, and wasn't even religious, I still had a general dislike of religious authority due to having never had a single good experience with it, this would cumulate whenever I watched some videos of people making fun of religious conservatives and agreeing with a lot of what these videos had to say, and affirming my own philosophical religious belief about materialism. However, I never watched any of the atheist skeptic community stuff on youtube, as I never had any interest in religion or religious debates itself. My economic beliefs started to change as well to fit the economic beliefs of the candidates I looked up to. This shift happened for a couple of reasons: me discovering strategy games, exploring different political candidates as previously mentioned, and watching youtube videos related to such topics. I became more economically left. And, while I had no stance on globalization at the time, due to the some of the populist rhetoric I had encountered from these videos I watched, I disliked globalism. However, I didn't know a lot about foreign policy, so I really couldn't call myself a nationalist. Along with having a bad idea of what feminism was, I thought it was just a bunch of men-hating social justice warriors whining about some imaginary patriarchy that didn't exist, along with trans people not being real. (However, I was not some Manosphere type person which is often associated with anti-feminism, as I didn't believe in any of that nonsense) But, I still supported some feminist ideas like abortion rights. So, my overall beliefs weren't conservative per-say, so much as they just represented the counter-culture present within this time period, and were just ultimately ill-informed due to not being knowledgeable about these things at the time. I was just an edgy degenerate who was in an environment were shock humor was normal and we made fun of each other even though most of us were (especially me) massive degenerates behind the scenes, that's cringe culture for you, we were all hypocritical children bullying people for their own passions and hobbies while hiding our own hobbies that we would be made fun for. I was a typical counter-culture atheist around this time.

/ (2019 - 2021) Becoming More Progressive Period

It was around of early 2019 that I came the realization that I had more agreement with progressive talking points more than I did with conservative talking points, and that some of the anti-sjw beliefs I held really didn't fit my cultural views. And in-general became fed up with the anti-sjw movement itself, as I saw it as using the same tactics as the same SJWs they were fighting. With this, I became more socially progressive and began dropping a lot of my ill-informed views that I had picked up. Along with becoming less critical of feminism and trans people. I began engaging with more progressive circles in politics. Which, is what I desperately needed around this time. As, my social beliefs were contradictory and didn't truly reflect what I thought. However, I still disliked the more SJW bits of progressivism, like pride culture and political correctness, but I stopped viewing it in the same lens I did last time. Because, when I was in these spheres of political discussion, it seriously made me reflect on my previous views and how cringeworthy these takes were.

So, the closeted thing I was around this time was a slightly progressive social democrat. I held broadly feminist, left-wing economics, anti-fascist, environmentalism, pro-lgbt views, ect. Although I didn't support NATO because I saw it as an empire that long outlived its usefulness. I hadn't truly embraced populism at this time, seeing it as a self-serving thing that only benefits people who want to use said populist rhetoric to become the same elite they are fighting against, so I wasn't a populist at this time.

Modern Period
// (Mid 2021 - 2022) Adopting Populism

I started to adopt more left-wing populist stances combined with my social democratic views on economics, along with becoming more progressive and supporting things like multiculturalism. However, I hadn't truly embraced left-wing populist, but I was slowly warming up to it, so I became more consistent with this view over time.

///// (Mid 2022) Adopting Georgism

It was around sometime during July that I read up on Georgism after having it recommended to me as a political ideology by someone on discord, as there was a couple of people with the same ideology as me who held this view of land. So, I gave it a look, and I found a lot of agreeability within Georgism and its view on land. So, after a couple of days day, I adopted Social Georgism into my political belief set. It was also around this time I readopted left-wing nationalism into my ideology as well.

]///// (Late 2022) Solidating My Beliefs

Now, this is were I basically stand. I am a left-wing populist social democrat. It was also around the time of summer of when I started to fully embrace my original roots. I also looked into Georgism around this time as well, and became skeptical of land speculation all together. With this, I stopped believing in landlords, and thought that a land value tax is the best way to tax land. I still maintain my culturally liberal beliefs. However, I disowned some things progressives advocated for like identity politics and would slowly become more and more critical of modern day progressivism.

///// (Late 2022 and onwards) Disillusionment with Progressivism

It was about this time I realized both progressives and conservatives are full of bullshit in their own regards. I became less progressive and in-general as I just became fed up with both sides of the political debate, seeing them both as retarded. My stances on culture now just more or less represent individualism, but they do still lean leftwards because of my past progressive influences that I do actually agree with. I've gone through so many rabbit holes during this time period, and I just ended up getting fed up with everything I went down, so I'm back to were I was basically before 2021. Consider this a 180 in my own political adventure. I started to embrace more edgy shock value humor during my school years of 2017-2021 and I am not afraid to speak my mind against both sides, as both sides are very much deserving of criticism.

Overview
So, to reflect on my entire political journey, I started off as apolitical like anyone else, then was an apolitical modern liberal when I supported democratic candidate Barrack Obama, but quickly became apolitical. Had a few hiccups during my apolitical phase, but got back to my original roots, then fell down a rabbit hole of left-wing anti-sjw videos, became a Bernie Sanders supporter in the process of all of this, and slowly got out of that "anti-sjw" phase. This followed up with me gradually accepting more progressive ideals while not buying into the preachy woke idpol stuff, but then completely forgoing of everything I had picked up from this point period by going into political rabbit wholes that contradicted my own beliefs, causing them to shift backwards, then becoming a full on woke Baizuo and a neoliberal puppet after consuming a bunch of postmodernist junk just because I hated conservatism. After I realized these beliefs were stupid, I started to pull back to my original populist social democratic roots, while still being almost fanatical about LGBT rights and other progressive policies. I got more nationalistic over time as well, and less progressive too. Now I've gone through my post-baizuo SJW phase, and I have adopted actually sensible social policies that aren't out of a response towards having a bad time with conservatives, but were still culturally liberal, and these beliefs now are likely not to change into the future.

My Political Journey
> >  >  >

Dad
Social Liberalism
 * [[File:Progress.png]] Progressivism
 * [[File:Socdem.png]] Social Democracy
 * [[File:Civlibert.png]] Civil Libertarianism
 * [[File:Humanismpix.png]] Humanism

Mom
Liberal Conservatism
 * [[File:Fiscon.png]] Fiscal Conservatism
 * [[File:Protect.png]] Protectionism
 * [[File:Modnat.png]] Patriotism

Sister
Social Libertarianism
 * [[File:Progress.png]] Progressivism
 * [[File:Bhl.png]] Bleeding-Heart Libertarianism
 * [[File:Raddem.png]] Radical Democracy

Granddad
Libertarian Conservatism
 * [[File:Xbert.png]] Christian Libertarianism
 * [[File:Honk.png]] Satirism

Grandma
Apoliticism
 * [[File:Moder.png]] Moderatism

Closeted Discord Friend
Satirism
 * [[File:Liberty.png]] Free Speech Absolutism
 * [[File:Blacknat.png]] Black Nationalism
 * [[File:Soccap.png]] Social Capitalism
 * [[File:Modprog.png]] Moderate Progressivism

Alexander
Liberalism
 * [[File:3way.png]] Third Way
 * [[File:Antifa.png]] Anti-Fascism
 * [[File:Glib.png]] Green Liberalism

Nouh
Democratic Socialism
 * [[File:Libsoc.png]] Libertarian Socialism
 * [[File:Leftpop-0.png]] Left-Wing Populism
 * [[File:Ecosoc.png]] Eco-Socialism
 * [[File:Nordmodel.png]] Nordic Model

Mark
Moderatism
 * [[File:Neoliberal-icon.png]] Neoliberalism
 * [[File:Radcent.png]] Radical Centrism
 * [[File:European_Federalism.png]] European Federalism

Political Compass Test


Economic Leftism / Economic Rightism (x): -2.00 Social Authoritarian / Social Libertarian (y): -5.44

Test Result: Libertarian Unity

SapplyValues


Equality / Markets (x): -3 Security / Freedom (y): -5.00 Progress/ Tradition (z): 4.69

Test Result: Libertarian Unity/ Libertarian Left

8Values
Equality 66.0% / 33.0% Markets (Social)

Nationalism 39.4% / 60.6% Globalism (Peaceful)

Liberty 76.6% / 23.4% Authority (Libertarian)

Tradition 30.0% / 70.0% Progress (Progressive)

Ideology: Social Libertarianism

9Axes (Long Version)
Federalism 70% / 30% Unitarism (Federal)

Democracy 78% / 22% Authority (Democratic)

Globalism 60% / 40% Isolationism (Moderate Globalist)

Militarism 25% / 75% Pacifism (Pacifist)

Assimilationist 51% / 49% Multiculturalist (Neutral)

Security 35% / 65% Liberty (Moderate Freedom)

Equality 64% / 36% Markets (Moderate Equality)

Secular 80% / 20% Religious (Extreme Secular)

Progress 68% / 32% Tradition (Moderate Progressive)

Ideology: Social Libertarianism

7Axes
Egalitarianism 60.3% / 39.7% Consumerism (Liberal)

Internationalism 57.4% / 42.6% Nationalism (Centrist)

Jingoism 24.9% / 74.1% Pacifism (Moderate Pacifist)

Authoritarianism 40.0% / 60.0% Libertarianism (Centrist)

Modernism 87.3% / 12.7% Traditionalism (Radical)

Accelerationism 65.4% / 34.6% Deccelerationism (Accelerationist)

Atheistic 90.6% / 9.4% Religious (Militant Atheist)

Ideology: Social Liberalism

12Axes
Federalism 61.0% / 39.0% Unitarism (Federal)

Democracy 71.5% / 29.5% Authority (Representative Democracy)

Security 36.0% / 64.0% Liberty (Liberal)

Internationalism 60.0% / 30.0% Nationalism (Co-operation)

Militarism 25.0% / 75.0% Pacifism (Non-Aggressive)

Assimilationism 35.0% / 65.0% Multiculturalist (Polyculturalist)

Collectivize 50.0% / 50.0% Privatize (Mixed Economy)

Planned 70.0% / 30.0% Laissez-Faire (Regulationism)

Protectionism 41.5% / 58.5% Globalism (Moderate)

Irreligious 82.0% / 18.0% Religious (Atheist)

Progress 75.0% / 25.0% Tradition (Progressive)

Technology 75.0% / 25.0% Bio-conservative (Technological)

Ideology: Social Liberalism

AmericanValues
Conservatism 28.3% / 71.3% Liberalism (Liberal)

Cooperation 68.0% / 32.0% Individualism (Collectivist)

Globalism 67.1% / 32.9% Isolationism (Globalist)

Freedom 55.6% / 44.4% Security (Moderate)

Doctrinial 63.8% / 36.2% Textual (Doctrinal)

Centralism 50.0% / 50.0% State's Rights (Balanced)

Ideology: Progressive Democrat

LeftValues
Revolution 5.9% / 94.1% Reform (Extremely Reformist)

Scientific 35.9% / 64.1% Utopian (Utopian)

Central 46.7% / 53.3% Decentral (Neutral)

International 75.0% / 25.0% National (Internationalist)

Party 92.3% / 7.7% Union (Extremely Partisan)

Production 38.9% / 61.1% Ecology (Ecological)

Conservative 35.9% / 64.1% Progressive (Progressive)

Ideology: Social Democracy

CapValues
Free Market 41.7% / 58.3% Corporatism (Regulationism)

Futurism 70.8% / 29.2% Conservatism (Progressivism)

Autocracy 36.5% / 63.5% Democracy (Representativism)

Authoritarian 44.4% / 55.6% Libertarian (Libertarianism)

Environment 61.1% / 38.9% Productivism (Sustainability)

Land Rights 40.0% / 60.0% Georgism (Land Value Tax)

Anti-Clerical 80.3% / 19.7% Religious (Atheism)

Globalism 70.8% / 29.2% Nationalism (Internationalism)

Interventionism 40.0% / 60.0% Isolationism (Non-Interventionist)

Accerlation 66.7% / 33.3% Deceleration (Research)

Elitism 29.2% / 70.8% Populism (Popular)

Disunity 75.0% / 25.0% Unity (Enemies)

Ideology: Social Meritocracy

LiberationValues
Moderate 70.9% / 29.1% Radical (Labourism)

Left-Unity 33.3% / 48.1% Lib-Unity (Libertarian Co-operation)

Centralized 73.3% / 26.7% Decentralized (More Central)

Localist 35.2% / 64.8% Globalist (Internationalist)

Traditionalist 35.6% / 64.4% Progressive (Progressive)

Reform 80.4% / 19.6% Revolution (Reformism)

Markets 52.1% / 31.2% Planning (Regulatory)

Ideology: Social Corporatism

EconValues
Equity 62.5% / Competition 37.5% (Redistributed)

Horizontal 60.9% / Hierarchy 39.1% (Levelled)

Demand 60.9% / Regulation 39.1% (Permissive)

Centralized 50.0% / Local 50.0% (Neutral)

Automation 56.3% / Employment 43.7% (Industrialized)

Commons 73.4% / Rent 26.6% (Anti-Rent)

Birth Right 22.9% / Merit 78.1% (Opportunity)

Unionized 75.0% / Divided 25.0% (Pro-Union)

Closest Match: Social Democracy

EconValues (Updated)
Leveled 65.0% / Competition 35.0%

Horizontal 65.0% / Hierarchy 35.0%

Planning 65.0% / 35.0% Markets

Central 75.0% / Local 25.0%

Automated 60.0% / Employed 40.0%

National 55.0% / 45.0% Global

Closest Match: Social Corporatism

Next Matches: Yellow Socialism,  Social Democracy

Worst Matches: Anarcho-Capitalism,  Left-Rothbardianism,  Crypto-Anarchism

Top 10 Closest Matches: WIP

Top 10 Furthest Matches: WIP

AuthValues
Oligarchy 95.5% / Autocracy 4.5%  (Bureaucracy)

Capitalist 42.9% / Socialist 57.1% (Mixed Economy)

Elitism 10.0% / Populism 90.0% (Populism)

Prevention 35.7% / Deterrence 64.3% (Discouragement)

Diverse 87.5% / Uniform 12.5% (Polyculturalist)

Irreligion 80.0% / Theocracy 20.0% (Irreligion)

Best Suited 75.0% / Hereditary 25.0% (Meritocracy)

Auth Disunity 83.3% / 16.7% Auth-Unity (Disunity)

Closest Match: Paternalistic Conservatism

Right Values
Reform 72.2% / 27.8% Conserve (Reformist)

Intervention 65.0% / 35.0% Laisse-Faire (Regulationist)

Authority 20.0% / 80.0% Constitution (Libertarian)

Particular 77.5% / 22.5% Universal (Pacifism)

Theocratic 0.0% / 100.0% Separation (Secularism)

Accelerate 70.0% / 30.0% Decelerate (Productivism)

Assimilation 62.5% / 37.5% Multicultural (Assimilationism)

Ideology: Geolibertarianism

ConservaValues
Moderate 88.8% / 11.2% Radical (Moderate Conservative)

Socialist 61.3% / 38.7% Capitalist (Social Democracy)

Authoritarian 43.3% / 56.7% Libertarian (Balanced)

Nationalist 38.5% / 61.5% Globalist (Diplomatic)

Conventionalist 81.5% / 19.5% Conspiratorialist (Conventionalist)

Ideology: Third Way

8Dreams
Altruity 57.5% / 42.5% Avarice (Realist)

Dominant 33.0% / 67.0% Insular (Ideological Pacificist)

Self 72.8% / 27.2% Totality (Individualist)

Stalwart 10.7% / 89.3% Hedonic (Hedonist)

Ideology: Social Kakistocracy

12Wackies
Altruity 54.7% / 45.3% Avarice (Realist)

Cosmocracy 81.6% / 18.4% Incognitism (One-World Government)

Self 66.1% / 33.9% Totality (Individualist)

Morality 54.7% / 45.3% Immorality (Average Joe)

Chaotic 65.0% / 35.0% Systematic (Self Isolationism)

Regressive 50.0% / 50.0% Replacement (Modern Technology)

Egalitarian 95.3% / 4.7% Supremacist (Post-Race)

Nihilism 116.2% / -16.2% Esoteric (Post-Religion)

Universalism 70.6% / 29.4% Urbanism (Continent)

Ochlocracy 70.0% / 30.0% Aristocracy (Elections)

Panculturalism 67.9% / 32.1% Monoculturalism (Cultural Blindness)

Destructionism -9.2% / 109.2% Irenic (Post-Aggressivism)

DozenValues
Equality 55.6% / 44.4% Property (Collective)

Coordination 67.4% / 32.6% Commerce (Regulated)

Dominion 43.1% / 56.9% Anarchy (Dispersed)

Permisison 79.2% / 20.8% Restriction (Tolerant)

Inclusivity 58.3% / 41.7% Supremacy (Respectful)

Heritage 36.1% / 63.9% Novelty (Neoteric)

Ideology: Left-Wing Populism

Next Matches: Social Democracy,

Worst Matches: Esoteric Fascism,  Jihadism,  Pol Potism

Top 10 Closest Matches:

WIP

Top 10 Furthest Matches:

WIP

6Foundations
Care - [23/30] 76.7%

Fairness - [23/30] 76.7%

Loyalty - [9/30] 30.0%

Authority - [16/30] 53.3%

Sanctity - [12/30] 30.0%

Liberty - [18/30] 60.0%

Estimated Ideology: Social Democracy

PolcompballValues
Sincerity 65.0% / Irony 35.0% (Rational)

Jannyphobe 61.4% / Jannyphile 38.6% (Populist)

Veteran 35.4% / Newbie 64.6% (Apprentice)

Wholesome 71.4% / Edgy 28.6% (Goodwilling)

Horny 87.5% / Anti Horny 13.5% (Decadent)

Active 34.5% / Lurker 65.5% (Sometimes)

Standard 50.0% / Wacky 50.0% (Political)

Boring 33.3% / Schizo 66.7% (Neurotic)

Liked 66.1% / Disliked 33.9% (Appreciated)

Discriminatory 23.4% / Inclusive 76.6% (Accepting)

Behaving 55.8% / Misbehaving 44.2% (Behaved)

DiscriminatoryValues
White 50.0% / Black 50.0% (Racial Egalitarianism)

Matriarchy 60.0% / Patriarchy 40.0% (Feminism)

Jeunism 40.0% / Adultism 60.0% (Moderate Adultism)

Hetero 40.0% / Homo 60.0% (Sexual Orientation Equality)

Cis 40.0% / Trans 60.0% (Transgender Equality)

Malthusocracy 60.0% / Lipostrocracy 40.0% (Body Type Equality)

CulturalValues Test
Monoethnic 13.1% / 86.9% Multiethnic (Ethnic Abolitionist)

Monocultural 31.7% / 68.3% Multicultural (Slightly Multicultural)

Favoritism 4.6% / 95.4% Equality (Absolute Equality)

Tolerance 79.8% / 20.2% Separation (Tolerant)

Pro-LGBT 78.7 / 21.3 Anti-LGBT (Pro-LGBT)

Nation 34.5% / 65.5 International (Continental)

Religion 0.0% / 100.0% Secular (French Secularism)

Essentialism 1.1% / 98.9% Constructivism (Extremely Constructivist)

Closest Match: Post-Modernism

Vanguard Values
Demagogue 87.5% / 12.5% Technocrat (Party)

Planned 14.6% / 84.4% Market (Market)

One Country 25.0% / 75.0% Global (International)

Military 9.4% / 90.6% Peace (Peace)

Proletarian 71.9% / 28.1% Peasant (Proletarian)

Uniform 37.5% / 62.5% Tolerant (Mixed)

Traditional 15.6% / 84.4% Neoteric (Progressive)

Populist 96.9% / 4.1% Elitist (Everyman)

Closest Match: Democratic Socialism

Religious Values
Pro-Catholic 0.0% / 100.0 Anti-Catholic (Fanatically Anti-Catholic)

Pro-Protestant 14.1% / 85.9% Anti-Protestant (Extremely Anti-Protestant)

Pro-Orthodox 12.7% / 87.3% Anti-Orthodox (Extremely Anti-Orthodox)

Philo-Semitic 41.0% / 59.0% Anti-Semitic (Neutral)

Islamophilic 15.1% / 84.9% Islamophobic (Extremely Islamophobic)

Pro-Buddhist 25.7% / 74.4% Anti-Buddhist (Anti-Buddhist)

Pro-Hindu 25.7% / 74.4% Anti-Hindu (Anti-Hindu)

Pro-Pagan 25.7% / 74.3% Anti-Pagan (Anti-Pagan)

Satanic 46.0% / 54.0% Divine (Neutral)

Religious 8.5% / 91.5% Atheistic (Fanatically Atheistic)

Closest Match: Secular Atheist

Dichotomy Philosophy
Materialism 75.0% / 25.0% Spiritualism

Egoism 66.7% / 33.3% Altruism

Idealism 57.8% / 42.2% Pragmatism

Hedonism 85.7% / 14.3% Asceticism

Nihilism 68.3% / 31.7% Moralism

Rationalism 39.7% / 60.3% Romanticism

Skepticism 91.7% / 9.3% Absolutism

Closeted Match: Objectivism, Nietzschean, Rousseaun

AltValues
Individual 85.0% / 15.0% Collective (Atomized)

Market 54.2% / 45.8% Planned (Mixed)

Essentialism 0.0% / 100.0% Constructivism Constructivist

Pragmatic 79.2% / 21.8% Idealist (Utilitarian)

Universal 84.4% / 16.6% Particular (Universal)

Ecological 37.5% / 62.5% Industrial (Balanced)

Politicized 54.2% / 45.8% Apolitical (Balanced)

Religious 0.0% / 100.0% Secular (Atheist)

Futuristic 66.7% / 33.3% Historical (Futuristic)

IdeoShapes
Civil Axis: Liberal

Economic Axis: Protectionist

Societal Axis: Progressive

Diplomatic Axis:

Closest matching ideologies: Liberalism,   Social Democracy,  Left-Wing Populism,  Progressivism

Complementarily opposed: Neoconservatism,  Right-Wing Populism,  Conservatism

Furthest matches: Nazism,  Theocracy,  Anarcho-Capitalism

Religious Typology Quiz
Solidly Secular

Political Typology Quiz
Progressive Left/ Establishment Liberal

Dichotomy Political Philosophy
Overall Left 74.8% / 25.2% Overall Right

Naturalist 100.0% / 0.0% Transcendental

Deconstructive 70.9% / 29.1% Traditional

Equality 55.9% / 44.1% Hierarchy

Liberation 73.1% / 26.9% Control

Closeted Match: Critical Thinker,  Socialist

Dichotomy Economic Test
Protectionism 34.1% / 65.9% Free Trade

Inter-Dependence 63.0% / 37.0% Autarky

Libertarianism 50.6% / 49.4% Statism

Globalisation 38.9% / 61.1% Nationalisation

Commercial 70.7% / 29.3% Subsistence

Adhocracy 35.9% / 64.1% Bureaucracy

Flat Tax 26.1% / 73.9% Progressive Tax

CN Values
Equality 63% / 37% Market (Equality Bias)

Freedom 67% / 33% Authority (Freedom Bias)

Progress 80% / 20% Tradition (Progress)

Ecology 55% / 45% Production (Neutral)

Closeted Match: Social Democracy

Follow Ups: Industrial Party,  Feminism,  Complete Westernization,  Pirate Party

Sex Values
Masculine 0.0% / 100.0% Feminine (Feminine)

Hyper 78.1% / Hypo 21.9% (High)

Dominant 58.3% / 41.7% Submissive (Switch)

Deviant 31.3% / 68.7% Pure (Vanilla)

Affection 12.5% / 87.5% Hedonism (Hedonist)

Center For a Stateless Society
Economic Leftist 65.0% / 35.0% Economic Rightist

Social Liberal 89.0% / 11.0% Social Conservative

Civil Libertarian 83.0% / 17.0% Civil Authoritarian

Antistatist 52.0% / 48.0% Statist

Anti-Militarist 81.0% / 19.0% Militarist

The Political Sextant Quiz
Top Ideologies:

Civic Nationalism 100%

Kemalism 100%

Social Democracy 100%

Three Principles of the People 100%

Third Way 100%

Worst Ideologies:

Anarcho-Primitivism -50%

Classical Marxism -50%

De Leonism -50%

Mutualism -50%

Agorism -60%

Anarcha-Feminism -50%

Marxism-Leninism -67%

National Anarchism -50%

Synthesis Anarchism -50%

American Political Bloc Quiz
Progressive - 189

Green - 182

Mainstream Democrat - 156

Libertarian - 131

Acela Centrist - 120

Neoconservative - 90

Establishment Conservative - 68

Trumpist - 68

Political Personality Quiz
Utopian Virtuoso

Policy Priorities:


 * [[File:Prog.png]] Social Equality - 95%


 * [[File:Socdem.png]] Social Healthcare - 95%


 * [[File:Technocracy.png]] Education Reform - 90%


 * [[File:Envi.png]] Environmental Health - 85%


 * [[File:World.png]] Amicable Global Relations - 85%


 * [[File:Multicult.png]] Immigration Rights - 80%


 * [[File:Sec.png]] Law and Regulation - 60%


 * [[File:Cap.png]] Wealth Maximization - 25%


 * [[File:ChristNat.png]] Religious Fundamentals - 20%

Party Alignment:


 * [[File:Demcr.png]] Democratic Ticket - 95%


 * [[File:RepubUS.png]] Republican Ticket - 3%


 * [[File:Libertarian.png]] Libertarian Ticket - 13%


 * [[File:GreensUS.png]] Green Party Ticket - 33%

Corona Lableak
I believe the Covid virus was likely developed in a lab, however, it wasn't used to depopulate the world or whatever else people say.

Vaccines
I won't deny vaccines do have adverse effects on some people, obviously, that would be dumb and denying reality. However, vaccine mandates themselves have long since been used to ensure societal safety, so naturally, government mandating them for the covid pandemic is entirely justifiable as it's all about harm reduction. And they don't cause stuff like autism and other things like that, the fact I should even have to mention that is a sad indicator of the clown world we are living in.

Creationism
Creationism is a myth and pseudo-science (like God and all religions naturally are), anyone with a brain should know this. There is more than enough evidence to suggest the earth is 6000 years old, I also shouldn't have to explain this either.

Trump
Trump insisted the capitol hill riot and is a traitor to this country who should be impeached. It is also very likely that he has connections to Russia as well.

Biden Stole the Election
Biden won the 2020 fairly, and there is very little evidence to suggest that he didn't win using legitimate means. I say very little because there was very likely election temporary, as that will happen naturally in all elections.

George Bush
I don't believe George bush fairly won the election.

The Israeli Mossad was behind 9/11
Wtf

The Holocaust never happened
Wtf

The Earth is Flat
No, it's obviously a cube. World governments have been pushing the round earth narrative to distract us from this.

[[File:Existentialist Anarchism.png]] Philosophy (Note: My philosophy is going through a radical rework to reflect my ideological changes, if it is contradictory then I'm still researching it)
I subscribe to existentialist thought, making it a libertarian philosophy that gives the individual free-will to make their own decisions, and to create their own meaning in life of absurdity, which will give the individual the fullest extent of their own personal autonomy.

[[File:OptNihil.png]] Optimistic Nihilism
Just because life is pointless doesn't mean there's no meaning in living, or that the future is pointless. So, I naturally subscribe to an optimistic view of the world, and see nihilism as counter-productive. Once the individual has found meaning in his life, he can naturally use his free-will to live his life how he wants to.

[[File:Skepticism.png]] Metaphysics
All metaphysical theories of the universe are pointless. We will never know how the universe operations on or why we are here. Materialism as a metaphysical concept is just another dogma that replaces religion, its making a claim about the universe that is certainly not true in the same way theological explanations of the world are. So, I naturally take an anti-foundational approach to this and reject this outright, since we will never know how or why we are here. We service no greater purpose than the meanings we create in our lives.

Moral Subjectivism
Morality is only at the eyes of the beholder, and differs from person to person from civilization to civilization, so objective morality doesn't exist since morality is written in cultural contexts, and is therefore not universal. Naturally, people create their own morality to choose how they want to live their lifestyles, meaning that actions themselves have the ability to be morally right and morally wrong, it's just how we apply those ethics are in no way universal and are different from person to person.

[[File:CountEn.png]] Romanticism
Emotions are important to define your character, and rationalism shouldn't be relied because it regards reason as the chief source and test of knowledge. Your own personal ideals should be what guides you.

[[File:Idealval.png]] Idealism
I would consider myself idealistic, I tend to stick to my own ideals and don't want to compromise on them because of how uncompromising I am, but I do realize that idealism itself cannot be used to achieve my political goals alone. So, the utilization of pragmatism is necessary at times to make changes you want for harm reduction.

[[File:Anti-Intellectualism.png]] Anti-Rationalism
I'm obviously opposed to rationality, it tries to put something above your own ideals. So, rationality as a concept is not helpful, since a rational world doesn't exist.

[[File:Anti-Humanism.png]] Anti-Humanism
Humanism is another form of dogma. It replaces god with man, and states that humans are the central equiry for rational decision making. This is no different than religion, and should be opposed as well.

[[File:Religious.png]] Religion
Religion is slave morality, it states that you have nothing else to live for than some higher being we cannot comprehend, making it anti-individualist.

[[File:Atheism.png]] Atheism
For this reason, I am an atheist. I shouldn't have to bound myself to the will of some higher being that doesn't exist. My own will comes from the meaning I create in life from the absurd world we live in. So, I don't believe in god or any organized faith. More specifically, I am a strong atheist, I believe in neither the concept of god or organized faith, and I'm absolutely certain on a personal level that all faiths, organized or not, are untrue, and the concept of God itself is not real. There is nothing that happens to us after we die, and this is the only life we will live.

As for my own religious backround, both my parents are (or atleast used to be, since my dad is an atheist and my mom merely pays lipservice to her faith) Roman Catholics. Although, they never forced me to adopt these ideals and every single time they tried to get me to learn about them all failed because of my natural behavior as a person which reflects materialism and hedonism. So, being someone who has always been obsessed with the real world due to this, there is not a single time in my entire life I can ever have recalled having thought anything outside the material universe existing, and it's impossible for me on a personal level to try and conceptualize this for the reasons I mentioned above. So, if you're going off the of the fact that the first time I've ever been seriously questioned about my beliefs, which was sometime back in 2017, I've been a strong atheist my entire life.

[[File:AntiSupernationalism.png]] Anti-Religion
Religion is something that separates the individual from their potential to live their lives how they want through being a slave of false morality, making the concept of religions anti-individualist and therefore bad for the individual, and should be rejected. However, people cannot be forced to give up their beliefs, as that's no more authoritarian than forcing people to adopt religious beliefs.

[[File:DVPermission.png]] Free Will
Individuals are able to create meaning in their lives using the free-will given to them in this absurd world we will never have an answer to, and then using that free-will, will able to live their lives to the fullest extent they can.

[[File:Indiv.png]] Individualism
The free will given to us to create our own meanings in our lives is were my individualism comes from, this is also were my political libertarianism comes from as well, I believe that philosophical individualism is best combined with political individualism to maximize my own personal freedom above all authority. So, my philosophy is "live and let live", I will let you enjoy what you're doing even if I think it is personally disgusting because it is of no authority of me to tell you what to do, since we all use our free will to create meaning in our lives our own ways.

[[File:Hedonism-cloud.png]] Hedonism
Going in further on my philosophical individualism, I use my free will and individual liberty to live my life as pleasurably as I want to. This is largely because of my own mental illness I was born with, ADHD, which is directly associated with impulsiveness. I find it hard on a personal level to not indulge on my personal desires even if I try because this has been my behavior ever since I've been born. Now, what do we mean when we mean pleasure? Because, pleasure means a lot of things to different people, and it could be argued that everything we do is hedonistic because we do it to avoid pain and for our own betterment. Well, the tpye of pleasure I'm specifically talking about is the euphoria that's felt from sexual pleasure, like masturbation or other things like that. I won't go any further into that because this would get NSFW very fast.

[[File:Socdem.png]] Economics
I support a mixed market economy, strong intervention in the economy through decentralized economic planners, a land value tax to fight off land speculation and stregthen tenent unions, and economic nationalism to help foster local production from job outsourcing to prevent the weakening of labor unions and worker co-ops. I also combine with this environmental justice, I'm well aware labor unions are hostile towards environmental policies, and I believe in policies that help push labor unions to become more green, along with worker co-operatives are as hostile towards such environmental policies.

[[File:Corptism.png]] Base Economic Model
My economic model is modelled after corporatism, which is an economic system that advocates for the organization of society in different areas of employment sectors like the agriculture, military, natural resources, ect, that are called corporations. These corporations are designated by the government to meet your interests and skills, which the government then coordinates the efforts between all of these to maximize the efficiency of production. The state negotiating all of this would effectively satisfy all the parties involved for a more effective guided economy.

[[File:SocDemCorp.png]] Social Democratic Corporatism
Going in further on my economic corporatism, my specific brand of corporatism would be social democratic corporatism. Social corporatism is a form of economic tripartite corporatism based upon the social partnership between the interests of capital and labor, involving collective bargaining between the representatives of employers and labor mediated by the government. Social corporatism isn't inherently collectivist like regular corporatism, and is respectful towards individualism while being more welfarist. Although, I reject the centralized approach, I believe local planners managed by the national government should be responsible for how sectoral collective bargaining happens.

[[File:Welf.png]] Welfare State
The welfare state will be expanded to combat things like poverty and other injustices in society. Things like disability, veteran, healthcare, unemployment benefits, pensions, and other social spendings will be increased and stregenthened to protect the most volunerable in society. This one should be kinda obvious as well since I'm a person who is naturally reliant on these services, y'know?

[[File:Socdem.png]] Universal Welfare
The welfare state will be universal, which means the accesibility of these services will won't be limited off of arbitary factors. This will be the most effective way to redistribute wealth compared to a non-universalist system.

[[File:Cooperative Capitalism.png]] Housing
A mixture of affordable housing will be in place by the government. Couple this with the liberalization of zoning laws for housing development, these would ensure that housing units are ready to be sold and easily available.

[[File:Georgist.png]] Land Value Tax
A land value tax will be in-place and land will be taxed based off the value of the land itself, how high the taxes are will be between medium and high. This is to fight of land speculation and strength tenant unions to fight for worker's rights to prop up said labor unions.

[[File:GeoSynd.png]] Tenant Unions
I naturally support tenant unions and workers within the housing industry to unionize and fight for their rights, tenant unions coupled with a land value tax and the liberalization of zoning laws will promote labor rights and sustainable housing markets.

[[File:Keynes.png]] Keynesianism
In terms of macroeconomics, I am a Keynesian. The government should take an active role in the market through monetary and fiscal programs to increase employment and spending. So, the taxes, interest rates and increase spending for economy busts, but will also cut spending and raise interest rates for economic booms.

[[File:Newkeynes.png]] New Keynesianism
WIP.

[[File:Natlib.png]] Foreign Policy
I support an interconnected world that helps each other for things like technological development and environmental protections, but I'm opposed to the status quo that offshores wealth by massive corporations, so my form of globalization would avoid economic globalization, but still support each other in areas where it is needed to prevent things like war and ect. I'm also skeptical of most regional and military alliances, believing that they are imperialistic and only serve world powers, I'm not opposed to being in an alliance so long as its good natured and not imperialistic. I also believe it's important to preserve the culture and heritage of our country for societal cohesion, and thus, support a mixture of civic and culture nationalism. Immigrants have to learn the language and culture if they want to enter the country, although legal immigration should be eased, but I'm opposed to illegal immigration due to them stealing our welfare benefits and driving things like wages down for our native citizens, but also opposed to the barbaric treatment of them under the Trump administration and the idea of a border wall, border security undoubtedly needs to be tightened and we cannot let illegal immigrants in, but such measures should be humane. The modern day concept of multiculturalism is a neoliberal ploy that will undermine our national identity and the social cohesion needed for the workers to co-operate with each other.

[[File:DVCommerce.png ]] Trade
I support free-trade and economic interdependence between similarily developed countries, free-trade has drastically lowered the prices of goods and increased standards of living globally. However, while I tend to support free-trade, these free-trade agreements must have workers and environmental protections written into them so we can get the most out of the free exchange of goods between countries without it being destructive towards labor rights.

[[File:Anti-Globalism.png]] Preventing Economic Globalization
I'm opposed to economic globalization, which in of itself is not the same as free-trade, free-trade has shown to be beneficial by lowering the prices of goods and bringing billions out of poverty, while economic globalization harms workers rights and the environment, and should be combatted whenever possible. Job outsourcing caused by economic globalization as caused both our trade-union movement and wages to decline. That is not good for the progressive movement, obviously. Which, can be seen with the adaptation of third way neoliberalism practiced by many center-left parties in West that have been directly caused by globalization, if social democracy is to return to its original purpose in the modern day, our jobs need to return back to our country, and we need to have a strong manufacturing industry.

[[File:Leftnat.png]] Nationalism
I am a nationalist, more specifically, a left-nationalist. I believe nationalism is important for maintaining our national sovereignty and the social cohesion of our society, since globalism is incompatible with socially progressive ideals and the welfare state. Selling out our country to transnational alliances that are imperialistic and other foreign aggressions is not within our best interests. The national interests of our country should also co-inside the best interests with the world as well.

[[File:Internation.png]] Internationalism
So, despite being a nationalist, I support international co-operation as well. However, I'm obviously skeptical of most regional alliances because I see them as only serving neo-imperialist powers, I still see the importance of working together with other countries for things like technology and the environment.

[[File:Globnat.png]] Alter-Globalism
My specific brand of internationalism is called global justice, also known as alter-globalization. Basically, I support an interconnected world that helps each other for things like technology and environmental stuff, but I'm opposed to the current status quo that only benefits massive corporations by allowing them to offshore wealth and lower wages for our native work-force. So, my form of globalization avoids the harmful effects of economic globalization, while still maintaining peaceful relations and co-operation for issues were it matters. Along with this, similar countries should be integrated with each other both politically and economically. So, my foreign policy is a mix of left-nationalism, peaceful internationalism, and pan-nationalism. It's important to help similarly developing countries while maintaining our own interests of our country as well from shady globalist organizations.

[[File: Pac.png]] Non-Interventionism
Intervention in foreign conflicts is often used as an excuse by major world powers to further their own imperialist narratives, so I naturally opposed intervening within foreign conflicts. The only times were intervention is necessary is if a country is committing a genocide, to stop the rise of an imperial state like Nazi Germany, or if another nation has attacked one of our allies.

[[File:Antiimp.png]] Diplomatic Neutrality
In terms of foreign affairs, do I side with the West or the East? Well, I would side slightly to the West, as they embody my values more, but I still oppose Western imperialism and Eastern imperialism. The West is too capitalist and globalist, while the east is too conservative and authoritarian, so quite frankly both sides suck, although the west is the place my individualism would be respected, but should still be called out on their imperialism.

[[File:Cball-NATO.png]] NATO
NATO is an imperialist and a self-serving alliance that sucks off to the American empire. The alliance serves no purpose other than to terrorize developing countries. Our purpose is not to play global cop, that has only lead to many third-world countries driving towards authoritarian states like China or Russia, our foreign policy is one that needs to emphasize human rights and democracy, and NATO embodies none of these ideals.

[[File:Antiwest.png]] NATO Dissolvement
For these reasons, I support the dissolvement of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization. It has no reason to exist in the modern day and is a terrorist organization. However, I do not support its dissolvement until the Russian invasion of Ukraine finds a conclusion, because dissolving it now would be foolish beyond any reasonable doubt. But, after everything has been set-in stone and the conflict is over, the alliance shall be abolished.

[[File:Welf.png]] Alternative to NATO
Just because I oppose the current NATO organization doesn't mean I don't support a new pan-national alliance built around the common defense of Europe and maintaining peaceful diplomacy. I support the replacement of NATO for a collective security council that includes Russia and the strengthening of intergovernmental organizations in the region to prevent war in the future. There needs to be a non-imperialistic alternative to NATO, a version that doesn't rely solely on the American empire to keep it going, and should be upheld by all members within it.

[[File:WEF.png]] World Economic Forum
The WEF is controlled by a bunch of undemocratic elites. The founder of the organization, Klaus Schwab, has openly voiced support for corporate take overs of world governments, this is literally IRL Fordism. The WEF needs to be either reformed to make it more accountable or needs to be abolished, since it is openly a neoliberal organization that seeks to give multinational corporations more power.

[[File:Zio.png]] Israel
Israel is a genocidal ethnonationalist government that is committing apartheid, while Palestine is full of Jidahists and anti-semitic terrorirsts that want to kill jews just for being ethnically Jewish. I think the establishment of Israel as a state during 1948 was a right thing to do, but the current Israeli government needs to stop using us, and their astroturfing of their neighbors territory.

[[File:Antizion.png]] Anti-Zionism
I'm opposed to ideological Zionism for all the mentions I just mentioned above, since the idea of establishing a Jewish state isn't bad, but the way it's being done now is completely unacceptable. Israel constantly violates international law and commits horrific crimes against humanity, which should be called out.

[[File:PostZio.png]] Post-Zionism
I support the self-determination of Jews and the establishment of a secular democratic republic in the Middle East for Jews to live in, since the creation of Israel was the right thing do. But, as mentioned previously, I'm completely opposed to the current Israeli government, they may be the only democratic state in the middle east, but they are certainly not our ally which has been proven time and time again. A new Israeli state needs to be established for these reasons that doesn't rely on neo-imperialism to build its homeland.

[[File:Cball-EU.png]] European Union
The EU is controlled by a bunch of out of touch cosmopolitan bureaucrats from Brussels that don't know what the countries want for the members residing within the economic union. Making it both undemocratic and neoliberal, it's been the primary pusher of economic austerity onto its member states, which has also contributed to the undoing of the welfare state thanks to economic globalization. Let's not forget when the UK Labour party post-WW2 held Anti-EU views because of what they saw the European Union as, an empire. So, I oppose the European Union as a neoliberal entity that is an undemocratic empire which commits economic imperialism, and has turned all of the center-left parties in Europe from traditional social democratic parties to third-way neoliberal parties that no longer represent what the original founders of said parties stand for.

[[File:Euroscept.png]] Soft-Euroskepticism
I'm a soft-euroskeptic, I don't think the union should be left, because leaving has shown to have had disastrous effects on the economies that do that, so it's better to push for reforms within the union itself to make it more representative of its members states. As, I'm obviously opposed to the undemocratic neolibtard EU establishment that has been destroying the universal welfare state for decades in countries that reside within the union, but disconnecting yourself from the global economy will be worse than if you just stayed.

[[File:Cball-UK.png]] On Brexit
Being a soft-euroskeptic, I'm opposed to these movements because they will leave the countries off in a worse state than if they just left. This can be seen with the chaos that unfolded after the United Kingdom under the conservative Tories left. Would I seek to rejoin the European Union in these instances? Probably not, since the global economy only works for massive corporations, but I would work out better deals to make sure leaving is as least destructive for the economy as possible. Since you can't just withdrawal from the global economy and not expect your economy to be destroyed in the process.

[[File:IllibDem.png]] Sanctioning Authoritarian Governments
I will side with the EU parliament and commission on illiberal governments that refuse to abide by its rules, since those governments are misusing EU funds, being drags on the alliance, and are aligned with none of my values. Being Poland and Hungary. I support their sanctioning until they either reinstate basic democratic principles and civil liberties or get kicked out, either or really works.

[[File:Euronaticon.png]] Pan-Europeanism
Just because I reject the european union and the neoliberal sham that it is, doesn't mean I don't support a pan-national alliance that unites all of these countries. The EU, while being an organization that only serves the corporate elities, has done something estounding, which has brought long-lasting peace between historically countries that have fought against each other like France and Germany. So, the need for that alliance to bring peace to the European Continent is still there, but the EU model just isn't good. The alliance itself should serve as a decentralized collection of states that still remain relatively good autonomy over their own countries while working together for the common good and to prevent war between said memberstates.

[[File:Cball-UN.png]] United Nations
The United Nations is a neoliberal sham that only works within the best interests of its corporate donors and the big five member states. Should we leave it? No, obviously. It should ideally be reformed to make it stay true to its purpose. But, the organization in its current state is just not good. I will recognize the good it does, such as its humanitarian aid and other foreign relief programs that keep millions from dying globally, but it's too much of a puppet of the permanent member states. This can be seen with the WHO and how it does a lot of China's bidding and the corona virus. Along with its other agencies like the IMF which only serve to debt-trap developing countries.

[[File:Cball-China.png]] China
China and the CCP are objectively one of the greatest threats to world peace we will ever see in the modern day. With their exporting of their totalitarianism globally to undermine democratic states and threatening their neighbors in the south china sea, and the ethnic genocide being committed in the southeastern provinces of Chinese territory, the CCP needs to be called out on an international scale for their unfair trade deals and undermining democratic states. I support the complete and utter destruction of the CCP on a personal level because they are everything I do not agree with politically, culturally, and economically. China as a state is my complete polar opposite, so this is to naturally be expected.

[[File:AntiDengism.png]] Anti-Dengism
China is not an anti-imperialist baston or communist, this should be obvious to everyone. It should be even more obvious that it is not returning to any of these values under Xi Jinping. Xi Jinping has undone all the relatively good liberal reforms to the country, and is going in the opposite direction. The transitionary state is never coming, and market socialism is not coming by 2050. It won't even come by 2100, because it is never coming, period. All of these values have greatly reversed under Xi's leadership, and while it was obvious that it wasn't coming to begin with, Xi has effectively put the market socialist transitionary state nail in the coffin, it is never coming. Although, I have to say all of this because anti-dengism shouldn't confused with sinophobia. Two of those things are different and should be made very clear, since there are some people who hate China for racist or xenophobic reasons, I completely disown such degenerative behavior associated with the Anti-CCP movement, I'm strictly talking about the CCP and the Chinese government alone.

[[File:Cball-Taiwan.png]] What about Taiwan?
Taiwan is the legitimate China and should be recognized as its own separate government on the international stage. It is one of the only functioning democracy in East Asia that respect my values, so I'm naturally going to support Taiwan over the CCP any day, since the CCP is a totalitarian state capitalist country. Although, Taiwan should seek greater independence from the United States and become more interdependent with its Asian neighbors in the region, but I do understand why they are so reliant on the United States when their entire existence depends on it.

[[File:Cball-US.png]] United States
The United States is also objectively one of the biggest threats to world peace. Even though China is a totalitarian state which respects none of my values, our foreign policy as been more destructive abroad, with the US government constantly violating international law to unjustly invade other countries. Both Chinese imperialism and American neo-imperialism need to be called out, since both sides are constantly going against my own values for their own selfish goals. However, should the trans-atlantic alliance be abandoned? No, the alliance between America and Europe that arose after the defeating of Nazi Germany after World War 2 should still be upheld, but it should seriously reflect to change with the times and what it means to be the "defender of the free world and democracy" if it is to survive in the modern day.

[[File:AntiAm.png]] Anti-Americanism
So, if it wasn't obvious, I'm opposed to the current American system. I oppose the imperial American state and what the neocons have done genociding third world countries for corporate elites to make money. The countless millions of people who have suffered under our military interventions just because some greedy corporate elites wanted to make money should be called out. America as a state is genocidal and cucked, its system needs to be uprooted from the ground and built anew, with a foreign policy that isn't genocidal and respects human rights.

[[File:Cball-Russia.png]] Russia
Russia is a failed oligarchical state that needs to be called out internationally. The Russian government, like the Chinese government, is completely polar oppositical to me in terms of my cultural, economic, and political views. While Russia isn't as bad as China is technically, since China is a totalitarian state and Russia is only an authoritarian state, Russia still surppresses the individual rights of its people while committing neo-imperialism like with what happened in Georgia, Crimea, and the Invasion of Ukraine. All of which should be returned and their full territorial integrity be reinstated.

[[File:AntiPutinism.png]] Anti-Putinism
Yeah, it's obvious. I'm completely opposed to Putin and his corrupt oligarchs. I support the opposition leaders who oppose Putin, being Alexei Navalny and Russia of the Future, along with other Russian opposition parties like Yabloko. The current Russian system is genocidal and imperialist, it needs to be entirely restructured and Russia as a state needs to be called out on the international stage, since it is one of the biggest threats to world peace. However, I oppose hating Russians, many of them want to escape the Putinist regime and that can be seen with the mass migration out of Russia. I support the Anti-Russian war movement and other events that destabilize the warfront, and nothing but complete victory for the Ukrainian government. Slava Ukraini. Although, I don't support Volodymyr Zelenskyy because he is a kleptocratic clown who openly is against worker's rights and has done shady stuff to provoke Russian aggression.

[[File:Intercult.png]] Immigration
I have no problem with immigration so long as its legal, I believe our borders should be made open to people who want to come here legally and the process should be effectively stream-lined into some point system or something to allow more legal immigrants in, since mass legal immigration is more preferable than mass illegal immigration obviously. I, however, am completely opposed to illegal immigration, illegal immigrants steal our jobs, get exploited by massive corporations which lower things like our wages and weaken labor unions, and all that stuff. Also, immigrants should integrate into the society they are placed in, but the native populations should be left alone and given cultural autonomy, but they adopt the national identity aswell.

[[File:CivCultNat.png]] Civic-Cultural Nationalism
My immigration integration policy mixes civic and cultural nationalism, I'm a bit weary of accepting immigrants from culturally disenfranchised places, but I think they should be allowed to come so long as there are strong integration programs in place that allow them to assimilate into society, which is what differs me from both civic and cultural nationalism, as I'm notably more open to legal immigration, but I think cultural itself should place more importance in immigration, while the national culture itself follows the melting pot model. So, in terms of the multicultural/monocultural scale, I find myself in the middle. I think a monocultural state is too unrealistic and restrictive, while a multicultural state is bad because it will erase our national identity and tolerate backwards cultures. I prefer a poly cultural state were different cultures are allowed to exist, but the cultures within said society have to stress the similarities instead of the differences, with all cultures having the national identity that defines them to ensure things like segregation and ethnic enclaves don't happen, which is present under multiculturalism.

[[File:Antimultcult.png]] Anti-Multiculturalism
Some cultures are better than others, that makes sense correct? It obviously doesn't make sense to compare American culture to some developing third world country riddled with crime and poverty, letting these two cultures mix without any assimilation policies would create nothing but societal chaos as can be seen with the mass immigration of Muslims into European countries, and while I'm not saying we should seal off immigration obviously, if they are to come here, then there should be strong assimilation programs in place so they know their worth in society. And, immigration coming from socially disadvantaged societies should be made stricter to ensure that they know their place that they are living in, and don't cause trouble for anyone else. That's not a hard thing to ask, if they can't respect that, then they shouldn't be in this country. Multiculturalism is bound to fail for these reasons I mentioned above, it's a ploy pushed by neoliberals to undermine the social cohesion needed for a social democratic state. I defend the immigration policies of European countries that refuse to accept immigrants from these places. However, I'm also completely opposed to ideologies like ethnic and racial nationalism, neither of which should ever bare if anyone comes into a country or not, I'm specifically talking about the cultures themselves. So, I reject racism and xenophobia, both of which are toxic for society as well, and should be called out on as well, since everyone deserves to be treated the same regardless of were they come from so long as they don't cause trouble for anyone else in society.

[[File:Bhl2.png]] Social Policies
I hold socially progressive views on culture, and support a society of permissiveness and tolerance. This includes things like LGBT rights, feminism, abortion rights, sexual freedom, racial equality, and all the essential civil liberties needed for a libertarian society to prosper. Although, I'm more center-left socially than left-wing because I reject things like political correctness, identity politics, forcing diversity just for the sake of diversity, and all of that, but still want to maintain a permissive society were people can do what they want when they're not harming others.

[[File:CultLib.png]] Cultural Liberalism
I support a society were the individual has the rights and freedoms whether or not to conform to cultural norms. This would follow the harm principle, so long as someone is not harming other people, then the individual should be allowed to express themselves how they please. This is aligned with my civil libertarian views on culture.

[[File:DVPermission.png]] Permissive Society
With the increasing cultural liberal views of society, a permissive society would start to take place. Were things like sexual freedom would increase, and laws would begin to be based on ethical instead of cultural ones. Along with victimless crimes becoming decriminalized, and alternative lifestyles would become normalized. Thus, creating a culture of permissive tolerance were people are respectful of each other's lifestyles with a "live and let live" attitude.

[[File:Indiv.png]] Cultural Individualism
I am an ethical individualist, people should focus on their own needs and leave others alone. If it ain't harming anyone then it ain't your business to tell someone what to do or not. Well, the "live and let live" philosophy has some strings attached obviously, you wouldn't be ok with someone watching child porn because they aren't harming anyone. But, so long as it isn't illegal or harming anyone, then the individual in this regard should be allowed to do as they please without any external form of authority telling them otherwise.

[[File:Paleoprog.png]] Classical Progressivism
I would call myself a classical progressive. What does that mean? Well, there are two kinds of progressivism, modern progressivism associated with the new left that focuses on things like intersectionality and identity politics, while you have classical progressivism that focuses on progressing societies economics and morals without focusing on identity issues. That is my form of progressivism, a form of progressivism that is focused on the progression of societal morals and social equality without approaching issues through power structures. I see modern day progressivism as focusing too much on pointless stuff that babies people and doesn't help achieve true social equality, which is why I'm critical of it.

[[File:Left-wingCon.png]] Old Left
This would make me an old leftist. The term "old leftist" is often conflated with conservative socialism in this community, but that isn't true. So, the old left are movements that arose in the 1960s which focused more on economic that cultural issues, and are typically more nationalist as well. I find myself identifying with all of these ideals. However, you can be socially conservative and be an old leftist, or socially progressive. I'm socially progressive and apart of the old left because I focus on economics than meaningless culture war pushed my massive corporations.

[[File:Socjust.png]] Social Justice
I obviously seek to uphold social justice, which is one of the main principles of social democracy. However, while I support the concept of social justice, I'm against the modern version of social justice. Which has turned into a bunch of woke authoritarians who want to silence anything under the guise of equality and force everyone to adopt their ideas. I believe in an equal society, but the current postmodernism associated with social justice is not what I'm referring to, I'm talking about true social justice that actually combats things like institutional racism without the inclusive radlib bullshit. So, I'm obviously pro-equality, but anti-woke. Wokeness isn't social equality, but reverse racism under the guise of anti-racism.

[[File:Indivfem.png]] Feminism
I am a feminist, my brand of feminism is what I like to call social individualist feminism. Basically, I believe that organized labor is the best way to fight for women's rights, but it would be done in an individualist way that allows them to empower themselves and other people around them, think of individualist socialist ideologies in which socialism is often associated with collectivism, which isn't true.

[[FIle:Socfem.png]] Social Feminism
Feminism is necessary for fighting for worker's rights, women should organize into labor unions and seek other legislation that gives them special benefits and fight for gender equality in the work field.

[[File:AtheistFeminism.png]] Atheist Feminism
Religions have historically only served to suppress the individual worth of women and have propagated sexism which is one of the main sources of social inequality for marginalized groups in society like gay people and fighting back against things like abortion rights. Organized religion should be actively rejected for these reasons, and secular thought should be the main driver of feminist theology.

[[File:TharFem.png]] Individualist Feminism
The state is another source of oppression of civil rights for women, when the state is minimized, individual liberty for women and their rights can truly be protected, and how they choose to live their lives can only be upheld without restrictions from both overbearing governments and communities. However, this obviously isn't to be confused with liberal feminism, which is what I'm specifically against because of its pointless things like intersectional identity politics that actively undermine one's individualism.

[[File:Menslib.png]] Male Feminism
Along with being a supporter of women's rights, it's also important to focus on men's rights as well. I know feminism encompasses both of these ideals, since feminism is about empowering both genders, but male feminism is more specific towards men's issues. So, I naturally support both of these movements, seeing how both of them make good points about societal injustices, it's important to encompass ideas from both of them.

[[File:Egirl.png]] Sex-Positive Feminism
Sex work is real work, and pornography should be normalized. These are normal human behaviors that we engage in because it's literally our body functions, there is no real reason why such things should be socially stigmatized. Feminism is an essential component of both women's and men's sexual freedom, this also includes things like gay rights as well, so I naturally reject the notions that porn and such are sexist when they aren't. So, I have no issue with either of these since they are affairs individuals themselves choose to partake in, and both will be legal. However, the age of consent is staying at 18 with no exceptions, drawn or not.

[[File:AntiAntiAbortion.png]] Pro-Choice Feminism
I'm pro-choice, I do not care how the fetus got into the mother or why she chooses to terminate the pregnancy, that is her decision and her decision alone. No government or community should be telling people what to do with their bodies, and I apply the same logic here as well naturally, so it's the women's choice to go through such. Although, abortion itself is a tragic act that nobody should have to go through obviously, and it's something that shouldn't be shamed or idealized, it's just something that should be allowed for convenience. First and second term abortions are fine and should be legallized fully. However, there should be restricted on third-term abortions for when the mother's life is at risk. With this, prenatal screenings of babies for things like genetic diseases should be allowed as well, and abortion should be made free under a universal healthcare system.

[[File:Fem.png]] Gender
I strongly recognize the two genders that exist, especially male and female. I reject the idea of gender abolitionism and a gender non-binary because both of these things aren't real. So, the two genders that exist will be treated with equal respect and have their rights protected, and things like gender neutral pronouns and non-binary gender will not be recognized. If someone wants to identify as something within the two-gender binary, then that's something I will respectfully recognize.

[[File:Antilibfem.png]] Anti-Liberal Feminism
I'm against liberal feminism. Liberal feminism has turned modern day feminism into a complete joke, with its obsession over pointless things like identity politics and intersectionality while only serving the neoliberal establishment. I support real feminism that actually fights for gender equality, and not the current state of feminism present within the United States.

[[File:Laicism.png]] Cultural Secularism
My ideal society would have 60%+ of the population identifying as irreligious, and more than 30% identifying as specifically atheists. Societal secularization is inevitable, so I support a society based of secular ethics and reasoning for this reason. However, I'm also contempt with what's called "neo-secularism", which just basically means that religious beliefs themselves have been modernized but the population is still religious, ideally both of the trends should take place to accelerate the decline of personal religious beliefs in the public sphere, since liberal theologies loose more followers yearly than traditional religious beliefs.

[[File:Atheism.png]] Cultural Atheism
Along with supporting the secularization of society, I'm also opposed to religious morals being the baseline standard for society as well. Ideally, both religious beliefs and religious morals should go, and the transition to a society that functions on secular reasoning and ethics should be in-place. Since these things limit the individual freedom of a person and enslave them to false morality, it doesn't benefit society and both should decline.

[[File:Gay.png]] LGBT Rights
Nobody should be discriminated against just off their sexuality and sexuality alone. I support a colorblind meritocracy were things like race, sexuality, and origin don't matter. What matters is your character and character above all else, so I naturally support LGBT rights, since one's sexuality is of usually no concern to me. They can have their rights legally protected for workplace discrimination, employment, adoption, all of that. I also reject heteronormativity, since heterosexuality isn't the natural state of preferred sexual preferences, gay people deserve to be socially represented to break the stigma around such behavior and to normalize it. However, as you will read down here and why, I specifically reject pride culture as a way of doing that.

[[File:Pinkcap.png]] On Pride
While supporting gay rights, since they're human like the rest of us and don't deserve to be discriminated base off of what they couldn't control at birth, I am against the current pride movement, seeing its usage of things like political correctness and identity politics as suppressing my individual worth as a person, along with it being a neoliberal tool that is used by massive corporations, but nobody who partakes in such should be attacked for such, even if I oppose it myself.

[[File:Trans.png]] On Trans People
Trans people can legally change their gender on binding documents and have their rights legally protected. However, I specifically reject trans pride, and I am against the notions of gender abolishment and non-binarism, believing that these are both unscientific and woke postmodern ideas that don't help anyone in-reality. Also, gender transitioning should be encouraged to be the last resort as well, since the dangers that come with such operations can't be ignored as well. But overall, they should be treated as people and not based on their sexuality. They can also partake in the sports they choose, but regulations would be in-place to ensure the legitimacy of these sport events and the inclusion of transgender people in them.

[[File:SJW.png]] Woke Culture
While I'm socially progressive and permissive, I'm tired of the woke culture that is associated with the cultural left-wing, not seeing it as helping our cause. Now, what do I mean by "wokeness"? Since wokeness is a flimsy used word that is used to describe anything remotely progressive a lot of the time, I'm specifically talking about postmodernism.

[[File:Postmodernicon.png]] What is Postmodernism?
Postmodernism is the idea that everything is defined by the cisheterowhite patriarchy and things like the traditional family, morals, and all that stuff should be rejected for a morally relativistic society that celebrates each others difference through things like identity politics and the creation of an inclusive environment through political correctness. There's more to postmodern philosophy obviously, but that's the best way I could describe it without this turning into a couple of paragraphs.

[[File:Antisjw.png]] Opposition towards Postmodernism
Now, this doesn't sound too bad, right? Well, in practice, it turns out to be really authoritarian and abandons a lot of the values liberals advocate for, with things like free-speech suppression in the name of political correctness and identity politics. Woke people are authoritarian moralists who want us to think and act the same as them, I reject this way of thinking. I'm against postmodernism as a tool to fight against racial injustice, which can be seen with things like critical race theory and movements like black lives matter. However, while being against these because they naturally don't help achieve social equality, I support social equality and a permissive society based off of "live and let live" philosophy and tolerance, but reject the hatefulness that is associated with postmodern philosophy.

[[File:AntiIdpol.png]] Against Identity Politics
Identity politics propagate essentialist views of people's identities which reinforces negative world views onto people, along with suppressing my individualism for a group identity that can never truly represent my own needs, it takes away my fundamental rights a person. I'm completely opposed to all forms of identity politics, whether it socially conservative or socially progressive, since identity politics are practiced very much by conservatives as well. It's important to keep true to your ideological goals without buying into such, as it throws away all of your values. For the same reason I'm opposed to political correctness because it babies people and is more often than not just insulting to people its referring to. So, things like gay pride, straight pride, trans pride, black pride, whatever pride it may be referring to, should be opposed.

[[File:Glibr.png]] Environmentalism
Upholding the environment is important, as the social cohesion of any country naturally needs a healthly environment to boot with it. There should be numerous state-regulations to protect the environments of Earth from its further destruction.

[[File:Envi.png]] Green Environmentalism [[File:Envi.png]]
The destruction of forests and other natural landmarks on the ground that we have destroyed out of careless have had disastrous effects on our environment and the species surrounding such. The government should nationalize most things relating to natural resources and turn them all into state-owned enterprises which are invested into using a sovereign wealth fund, which will be used for government expenditures like the welfare state.

[[File:WaterEnvi.png]] Blue Environmentalism [[File:WaterEnvi.png]]
We also cannot ignore the oceans as well, with the mass littering and other destructive environmental practices caused by us out of carelessness, we need to implement laws that prevent such destructive practices and crack down on anyone doing such. The protection of natural landmarks and coral reefs should be upheld. With all of this, we need to invest in more ways to turn salt water into drinkable water as well, since the current ways are very expensive and not doable at a scale required to maintain civilizations, it's a future investment that should be worked towards since it will prevent the deaths of hundreds of millions of people who suffer from water insecurity.

[[File:Ectrans.png]] Environmental Technology [[File:Ectrans.png]]
One of the key factors in defeating climate change will be technology relating to environmental policies. We obviously cannot solve climate change, we're at a point in time were the disastrous effects of climate change are going to happen no matter what even if he developed the most advanced tech in this field overnight because of the industrial revolution and the explosion of the human population. If we were to reverse the trends of global warming, that would require we either kill billions of people to curb carbon emissions, or we return to the stone age, none of which are things anyone wants to do. So now, it's just a game of harm reduction, the more we do now, the less people will die in the future, but it ultimately cannot be stopped as much as the effects can be lessened.

[[File:Ecoglob.png]] Environmental Globalization
I support treaties like the Paris Climate accord and other one's that attempt to coordinate efforts between countries to solve climate change. Developed countries should be actively pressured by intergovernmental bodies to change their carbon emissions or face economc sanctions. However, developed countries will naturally be exempt from this, as they cannot bear such economic cost when they don't have the necessary infrustucture to handle it.

[[File:LeftBert.png]] Government
I support a semi-direct constitutional non-particpary parliamentary federal republic. Along with secularism, privacy rights, and the ending of the survillence state with the repealing of most government survillence in areas were it isn't necessary. I'm find with things like CCTV cameras in public places, because those are there for a good reason, but the surveillance state now is much more less an excuse to spy on everyone to collect their information that the government cannot even properly manage anyways without it getting leaked or something, so I'm heavily opposed to most government surveillance.

[[File:Secular.png]] Secularism
Church and state will remain separate, and there will be a strong wall between church authority and state authority. I'm naturally opposed to religious institutions because they are one the main sources of societal oppression we see today and the biggest perpetrators of delusional falsehoods we call religion on this planet. Churches will be taxed, and "religious freedom" that is used to discriminate against individuals will not exist because the freedom of individuals is no excuse for discriminatory practices in fields like jobs or adoption. However, religious schools will be mandated to teach scientific theories about the universe and public schooling will be based on purely secular ethics. Anyone has the right to practice what religion they want, and no form of religious expression will be banned.

[[File:ProgBert.png]] Secular Libertarianism
If it wasn't obvious, I am a secular libertarian. I base my affairs on nothing but naturalistic philosophy and secular ethics. So, I believe in an open society were theocratic and illiberal states are rejected for a pluralistic society that respects social equality and political freedom.

[[File:Thar.png]] Anti-Statism
The State is another source of oppression, it limits your potential individualism by monitoring you every second of the day. So, to be a true individualist, you have to be a philosophical and political individualist, libertarianism is naturally the best way to achieve individualism. While liberals say they respect the individual choices of people, they still allow the government to spy on them through the surveillance state, which isn't true individual liberty. The surveillance state doesn't do its job at keeping people safe, it only furthers the needs of corrupt governments, down with mass surveillance. However, I'm ok with some good natured surveillance that's necessary to keep the population safe, like CCTV cameras in public areas, however, those surveillance measures should be just that, and not expand into anything more like what we see today. Because, it's a gross violation of both our political and personal liberty, and can be seen with the degenerative nihilistic dictatorships like the Third Reich, Maoist and modern day China, and the USSR. Authoritarianism is an evil that should fiercely fought against for these reasons.

[[File: Civlibert.png]] Civil Libertarianism
I am a civil libertarian, if you couldn't tell from my anti-statism. I believe in extensive civil liberties for the average person to live their life how they want to from the government. This is in-line with my individualistic stances on personal freedom, anyone should be allowed to do what they want unless they are committing a crime or harming other people. With this, most victimless crimes would be decriminalized, since victimless "crimes" are not crimes. The drug war being a great example of this, there's far better things to be spending law enforcement on.

[[File:FDF-Pirate.png]] Right to Privacy
The right to privacy shall not be infringed, with the weakening of the surveillance state and getting rid of most unneeded surveillance programs, the individual will both have extensive personal freedom and political freedom to live their life how they seek fit, which is will maximize the potential individualism of all people. Although, I put this here not just because of government survillence, but because of big tech survillence, they are also spying on you as well and need to be dealt with if a libertarian society is to ever be realized.

[[File:Liberal Democracy.png]] Liberal Democracy
I support a liberal democracy, a government should be for and by the people. As, that's the only way a government can represent the needs of the common people. However, I think the concept of a defensive democracy is quite flawed, undemocratic parties should be allowed to exist, but should have to drop their beliefs if they ever want to actually participate in government, along with being extrensively monitered. I'm not a fan of defensive democracy because I've seen how the government has used curtialing political freedoms as an excuse to strengthen the surveillance state in the moment without revoking the policies made to continue the expansion of the services that I'm opposed to.

[[File:Parl.png]] Parliamentarianism
I favor a parliamentary system over a presidential system. Presidentialism as a system just turns into a democratic autocracy were the leader holds too much power and can do a lot of bad things if not properly checked, which can be seen in places like Turkey under Erdoğan.

[[File:Semidirect.png]] Semi-Direct Democracy
Combined with my support for liberal democracy, I support semi-direct democracy on the local level. Things like regular elections should be held, but the representitatives would still do most of the governance. This differs from both a representative democracy and a direct democracy, with representative democracy being a sham that often falls victim to corporate power, while direct democracy is too bureaucratic and expensive to implement on a nation wide level.

[[File:Antiparty.png]] Non-Partisan Democracy
Political parties fundamentally undermine the democratic process. What was once supposed to be a way to represent the needs of the voter base through the organization of candidates through political elections has become unrepresentative of what the people want. These parties overtime become unrepresentative of what the people want, with the general population mindlessly voting for candidates that have a logo right next to their name without even considering if the candidate itself is qualified, which only worsens the problem on a societal level to the point were a radical restructuring and mass education campaign would be necessary to shift the attitudes of the population. My kind of democracy is one that has no political parties, this would ensure that integral part of the democratic process remains intact.

[[File:Consti.png]] Constitutionalism
I support the creation of a constitution that protects our civil liberties and ensures that due process within the legal system and human rights are upheld. However, while a constitution is good, it will be interrupted as a living document to change with the times.

[[File:Republicanismpix.png]] Republicanism
The state will be a republic, and leadership will be non-hereditary. Monarchies have been historically oppressive so I naturally oppose them. However, I'm fine with constitutional monarchies in countries were it defines their culture so long as the monarchs themselves largely back off from political affairs and aren't oppressive. If the monarchs are oppressive, then that's the only time I would support their abolition.

Friends

 * [[File:LibSocDemIcon.png]] Libertarian Social Democracy - LITERALLY ME! Based!
 * [[File:BertSocGeo.png]] Libertarian Social Georgism - Also me as well! We need a land value tax.
 * [[File:LibertGeo.png ]] Libertarian Georgism - Nice ideas. Too free-market though.
 * [[File:Femboy.png]] Femboyism - Bro, ABSOLUTELY BASED!
 * [[File:AnarchoFrontierism.png]] Anarcho-Frontierism - Adiós, amigo.
 * [[File:Geokitty.png]] Georgism - Whose a good kitty? You are, you are! Let's go harass landlords together, gal.
 * [[File:Demcon.png]] Democratic Confederalism - You are by far the most based state in the middle east, even if I don't agree I would rather live under this society that most societies in the middle east other than Israel.
 * [[File:Ectrans.png]] Technogaianism - Protecting the environment is the upmost importance!
 * [[File:CountEn.png]] Romanticism - Your own emotions define you and your actions, stick true to your own ideas and character.
 * [[File:Anin.png]] Anarcho-Individualism - Agree to disagree here and there, but after all things considered, you are my more radical anarchist self who I admire greatly. Be yourself, no matter what they say or tell you to do. No gods, no masters.
 * [[File:Existentialist Anarchism.png]] Existentialist Anarchism - Do you hear the birds chirping, do you see the flowers blooming?
 * [[File:Anjew.png]] Jewish Anarchism - Some existentialistic philosophers who influenced me were Jewish.
 * [[File:LibertKeynes.png]] Libertarian Keynesianism - Great idea! Keynesian economics are mine, but regular Keynesianism is way too statist for my liking.
 * [[File:Honk.png]] Satirism - Being funny is a good trait.
 * [[File:Angeo.png]] Geoanarchism - Radical, but I like your style.
 * [[File:Thar.png]] Anti-Authoritarianism - We resist nazis, commies, and reactionaries together. Down with the neoliberal status quo!
 * [[File:Civnat.png]] Civic Nationalism - Some good ol' fashioned nationalism never hurt anyone, paired with internationalism obviously.
 * [[File:Cultural Nationalism.png]] Cultural Nationalism - Ditto, although you are a bit too restrictive on immigration for my liking, I prefer civic cultural nationalism.
 * [[File:Leftnat.png]] Left-Wing Nationalism - Leftism and nationalism naturally go together. It's a shamed to see so much radlibs in the United States be against this. Left-nationalism and alter-globalism go together greatly.
 * [[File:AmericanNat.png]] American Nationalism - America isn't the best nation to exist, but we need to stand up for its ideals even if I don't like the state my country is in.
 * [[File: Indiv.png]] Individualism - Let me go, I want to be free. Please.
 * [[File:Melenchon.png]] Mélenchonism - I'm not a socialist, but you actually have some nice ideas and I rather like you as a candidate.
 * [[File:Natlib.png]] National Libertarianism - Basedish, but some of you guys are really iffy to say the least. At least you don't support warmongering like those neolibertarians. Any patriot shouldn't blindly suck off the dick of the government, any self-described patriot who does this is not a patriot, but a national traitor. You're the true form of nationalism.
 * [[File:Camus.png]] Albert Camus Thought - He had a a lot of good ideas.
 * [[File:LaFollete.png]] La Follete Progressivism - I've gotten a lot of inspiration from you. All I can really say is based.
 * [[File:Euroscept.png]] Euroskepticism - I'm not opposed to the idea of a pan-national alliance for Europe, but the current EU is a neolibtard corporate serving union that doesn't know what its members want. I strongly oppose the EU, if it wasn't obvious.
 * [[File:LeftBert.png]] Left-Libertarianism - Just fuck off.
 * [[File:Modnat.png]] Patriotism - You could go a bit further, but still based none-the-less. It's normal to be proud of your country, any person who rejects such basic principles doesn't know what's good for them.
 * [[File:Globnat.png]] Alter-Globalization - We need a world were the global economy works for the many, not the few.
 * [[File:Pannat.png]] Pan-Nationalism - Culturally similar countries need to support each other and be more intregated, both politically and economically. However, you have also been historically used for imperialistic reasons. Combine this with left-nationalism and alter-globalization and you basically have my foreign policy. Countries should work together without the globetards budging in to ruin everything.
 * [[File:NatProg.png]] Bull Moose Progressivism - For a statist, he was good for his times. Teddy Chadsevelt. (Can you own up to your imperialism though?)
 * [[File:Prog-u.png]] Progressivism - A bit narrow-minded, but your social views are absolutely based.
 * [[File:Bhl2.png]] Bleeding-Heart Libertarianism - A bit too capitalist and socially progressive, but you largely emulate my social views. Don't go around policying what people say though.
 * [[File:Civlibert.png]] Civil Libertarianism - Individual rights now, individual liberty forever!
 * [[File:Laicism.png]] Anti-Clericalism - Religion only suppresses individualism.
 * [[File:Social corpratism.png]] Social Corporatism - A tad *too* auth for my liking, but markets need to be regulated.
 * [[File:Protect.png]] Protectionism - Cheap importants and job outsourcing have killed our manufactory industry and offshored all of the jobs to countries with weak labor standards. Although, you could import a bit more though, imports lower the cost of goods and increase business output as a result but the mass flooding of cheap imports from developing countries and job outsourcing need to be strictly prohibited to protect american workers.
 * [[File:Progconf.png]] Progressive Conservatism - Also me! But slightly more conservative, just combine this with progressivism and you get my social views.

Frienemies

 * [[File:Libertarian.png]] Libertarianism - You have the right ideas about liberty, but your economics are subpar.
 * [[File:Libsoc.png]] Libertarian Socialism - You also have the right idea about liberty as well, and while your economics are better than the above, your violation of property rights makes me vomit.
 * [[File:Clib.png]] Classical Liberalism - Ditto above.
 * [[File:Lpop.png]] Left-Wing Populism - You wouldn't be a horrible front to get into power, but you're more often than not a puppet of demoguages who don't have the best people's interest in mind. Actions speak louder than words.
 * [[File:Socdem.png]] Social Democracy - Right idea on economics, but your statism ain't cool cheif. Better than most statists.
 * [[File:Zio.png]] Zionism - The jews deserve a homeland after thousands of years of oppression, but that doesn't mean you can commit aparthed and genocide just because it happened to you as well. Better than most states in the Middle East, as I kinda prefer living in places were I wouldn't be immediatelly killed in, and most of the Middle East doesn't suit that for me.
 * [[File:Ego.png]] Egoism - Very iffy on nihilism and post-structuralism, but the radical individualism is always welcomed by me.
 * [[File:Libcon.png]] Libertarian Conservatism - Oxymoronic, but at least you don't want to force your views onto me. Which, is saying a lot better than most conservatives.
 * [[File:Utsoc.png]] Utopian Socialism - Right on a lot of Marxist conceptions, but you aren't what I'm ultimately aiming for, and relying on purely utopic world views won't get you anywhere bud.
 * [[File:WelfChauvin.png]] Welfare Chauvinism - Me, but more insane. You're an ok concept but holy shit the identitarianism and blatant racism is a massive no for me.
 * [[FIle:Awaj.png]] Anarchism - I believe in minimal state, but you would more often than not result in tyranny by mob rule, better an anarchist society than an authoritarian society.

Enemies

 * [[File:Altr.png]] Alt-Right & [[File:Fash.png]] Fascism - Your ideologies are so cringe and everything I'm flat out opposed to, you guys are the real degenerates. At least you have the balls to stand up to the woke postmodern status quo that we are living in, despite how much I wholeheartedly despise /pol/ and everything it propagates.
 * [[File:Conserv.png]] Conservatism - This is what a court jestor is for, everyone. To be constantly humiliated, this is the only purpose you serve, and nothing else. Now, go back to living in your delusioned world.
 * [[File:Demcr.png]] Democratism & [[File:RepubUS.png]] US Republicanism - From my own personal experiences, neither side really cares about my rights as an individual. Both would rather pay their corporate doners than focus on people who actually need help in society. The two party system is a mistake to be frank, fuck both of you guys, only some good democrats exist, but that's about it.
 * [[File:Cosmo.png]] Cosmopolitanism - Moderate globalism is a bad idea, now go away reactionary cosmopolitan.
 * [[File:Cfash.png]] Clerical Fascism - Your state-worship is the same idolatry you claim to be against.
 * [[File:Marxlen.png]] Marxist-Leninism & Nazi.png]] National Socialism - [[File:Pe3o5mul2nz81.gif
 * [[File:World.png]] Globalism - You will be the death of worker's rights and our national identity.
 * [[File:ChenQuanguo.png]] Chen Quanguo Thought - Unironic Nazism with Chinese characteristics. China is committing the largest genocide in the modern day since the holocaust, and may all the victims of the horrific crimes against humanity committed by the CCP be revenged.
 * [[File:Neoliberal-icon.png]] Neoliberalism - Fuck you.
 * [[File:Corp.png]] Corporatocracy - The status quo, DIE DIE DIE!
 * [[File:Esofash.png]] Esoteric Fascism - My polar opposite reeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
 * [[File:Cdem.png]] Christian Democracy - You want to enslave me with false morality and a god that doens't exist, I don't give a fuck if you give welfare the neoliberal status quo would be better than this. The only real good thing you did was fighting off the Nazis and establishing the welfare state in Germany. Outside of that, fuck your moral values.
 * [[File:USASolidarity.png]] American Solidarianism - Literally Hitlerism and 1984, no no no and no.
 * [[File:Identi.png]] Identitarianism & [[File:SJW.png]] SJW - Identity politics were a mistake to begin with, case in point.
 * [[File:Dengf.png]] Dengism - Death to the CCP 🔥🇨🇳🔥
 * [[File:Sinophobia.png]] Anti-Chinese Sentiment - Sure, China is a totalitarian state-capitalist empire that is basically my polar opposite in terms of political and economic beliefs, but hating Chinese people for just existing is gay.
 * [[File:Russophobia.png]] Anti-Russian Sentiment - Same thing, not all Russians are like that and many of them are just decent people looking to escape the quasi-fascist Putinist regime.
 * [[File:Antifa.png]] Anti-Fascism - Bunch of woke authoritarian moralists. Do something better with your time PLEASE! YOU'VE TURNED POLITICS INTO RELIGION AND BURN ANYONE WHO DOESN'T AGREE WITH YOU ON A STAKE.
 * [[File: Ethnonat.png]] Ethnic Nationalism - Why is cultural nationalism always confused for this lmao. I never mentioned ethnicity once, I could give less than two shits about race or ethncity, which will never be a factor in immigration. The only thing I really care about is culture.
 * [[File:Racenat.png]] Racial Nationalism - Many users have said the same thing I've said, I'm not gonna say it because I quite frankly do not need to say it.
 * [[File:Anti-Semitic.png]] Anti-Semitism - Kill yourself, and die a slow and painful death. You in-denial neo-nazi.

Basedness Quiz (Completely redoing AGAIN)
1. I support a nationalistic state with international co-operation, and culturally similar countries should be intregated with each other both politically and economically +1
 * I support one but not the other/I'm a patriot but still support internationalism +0.5
 * I'm an ultranationalist or chauvinist/anti-nationalist +0

2. The welfare state should be expanded and public services should be strengthened +1
 * Welfare state shouldn't be universal, but it shouldn't be drastically cut. Some welfare programs should exist to help the needy +0.5
 * Disagree +0

3. I support both freedom of religion and freedom from religion +1
 * Only freedom from religion is important +0.5
 * Disagree +0

4. Immigration reform is important, and legal immigration should be made easier while illegal immigration should be clamped down upon
 * I'm more moderate on this issue, but I still support some of what you have to say +0.5
 * Disagree +0

5. I support a mixed market economy, with a state-guided economy based on sectoral bargaining and tripartism +1
 * I support a social market economy, with most of the private industry remaining untouched by the government with some planning of central industries/free-market socialism +0.5
 * Disagree +0

6. A government that is based off of being for the people, aka democracy, is important. Along with all the other essential freedoms like human rights and free elections.
 * Agree, but I support a direct democracy +0.5
 * Disagree, I support a dictatorship or anarchism +0

7. I'm moderately progressive on social issues, and realize the need for an egalitarian society while maintaining some traditions that are legitimately beneficial for society.
 * I am culturally progressive/culturally moderate leaning progressive or conservative +0.5
 * Disagree, I am conservative +0

8. Same-sex marriage should be enshrined into law, among with other protections for the LGBT community since they're human like the rest of us and are deserving of the same respects as everyone else, while opposing pride culture.
 * I agree, but I support pride culture +0.5
 * Disagree +0

9. All drugs should be decriminalized, and the drug wars should be put to an end +1
 * Agree, but I would go a step further and legalize all of them/legalize some drugs but keep most illegal +0.5
 * Disagree, they are destructive for society and should all be banned +0

10. I support feminism and gender equality, women's rights are important as women uphold half the sky and should be treated normally like anyone else +1
 * I agree, but gender roles should be socially encouraged but not forced, I'm never pro or anti-feminism, but still support some of what feminists espouse. +0.5
 * Disagree, I am manosphere/anti-feminist +0

11. Individual freedom from the state and social norms are important to realize the fullest potential of individual liberty +1
 * Individual freedom is important, but the state should be there to protect those individual freedoms/social norms shouldn't be forced by the state but forced by the community +0.5
 * Disagree, social norms are important to maintain a stable society +0

12. People should be able to do what they want, even if I find it personally disgusting or leaves them to danger +1
 * I believe in both individual liberty and personal responsibility are things that are needed for a safe society, but the state shouldn't enforce these morals onto the population as much as it should be socially discouraged. +0.5
 * Disagree, a paternalistic state is needed to guide the population, and individual freedom should be greatly restricted in the name of upholding the common good of the community +0

13. I support a non-aligned foreign policy, both Eastern states like China and Russia are empires while the West is the slightly lesser evil, but still as guilty. +1
 * I agree with you on the eastern states, but I support the west +0.5
 * Disagree, I think the eastern states are the lesser evils in the worlds affairs and should counter the influences of the west +0

14. Free-trade is beneficial for our country, but worker's rights need to be written within said agreements and economic globalization is something that needs to be fought against tooth-and-nail +1
 * I'm moderately protectionist, and support medium to high trade-tariffs on foreign goods while opposing economic globalization +0.5
 * Disagree, globalization is inevitable and must be embraced +0

15. Trans people should be legally recognized by the state, and have their rights protected from hate crimes and other forms of social discrimination +1
 * Being trans is real, but there shouldn't be any laws anti-discrimination laws for things like adoption and marriage +0.5
 * Disagree, trans people should be persecuted and socially outcasted +0

Favorite quotes
“Anyone can deal with victory. Only the mighty can bear defeat.” - Adolf Hitler (He lost lmao)

“In twelve years from now, you will not recognize Berlin.” -  Adolf Hitler (He lost lmao)

"All you have to do is kick in the door and the whole rotten structure will crumble to the ground." - Adolf Hitler (He lost lmao)

"Altruism is a moral system which holds that man has no right to exist for his own sake, that service to others is the sole justification of his existence, and that self-sacrifice is his highest moral duty, value and virtue. This is the moral base of collectivism, of all dictatorships"

- Ayn Rand

"The purpose of morality is to teach you, not to suffer and die; but to enjoy yourself and live."

- Ayn Rand

"The question isn't who is going to let me; it's who is going to stop me."

- Ayn Rand

“the harder the conflict, the greater the triumph.” - George Washington

“If the individual has the right to govern himself, all external government is tyranny.” - Benjamin R. Tucker

“Being all equal and independent, no one ought to harm another in his life, health, liberty, or possessions.” - John Locke

"If one meets a powerful person--Adolf Hitler, Joe Stalin or Bill Gates--ask them five questions: "What power have you got? Where did you get it from? In whose interests do you exercise it? To whom are you accountable? And how can we get rid of you?"

- Tony Benin

"The love for all living creatures is the most noble attribute of man." - Charles Darwin

“Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the universe.” - Albert Einstein

“Peace cannot be kept by force, it can only be achieved by understanding.” - Albert Einstein

“If a free society cannot help the many who are poor, it cannot save the few who are rich." - John Kennedy

“Mankind must put an end to war - or war will put an end to mankind." -  John Kennedy

“If by a "Liberal" they mean someone who looks ahead and not behind, someone who welcomes new ideas without rigid reactions, someone who cares about the welfare of the people-their health, their housing, their schools, their jobs, their civil rights and their civil liberties-someone who believes we can break through the stalemate and suspicions that grip us in our policies abroad, if that is what they mean by a "Liberal", then I'm proud to say I'm a "Liberal.” -  John Kennedy

"People hate politicians. And I can understand why." - Alexei Navalny

"I am not in politics for power. I am in it for justice." - Sviatlana Tsikhanouskaya

"Death to fascism, freedom for the people!" - Yugoslav Partisans

"The world will not accept dictatorship or domination." - Mikhail Gorbachev

"Contemporary social democracy is what I believe is the right concept." - Mikhail Gorbachev

“Peace is not unity in similarity but unity in diversity, in the comparison and conciliation of differences.” - Mikhail Gorbachev

"I'm for the poor man - all poor men, black and white, they all gotta have a chance. They gotta have a home, a job, and a decent education for their children. 'Every man a king' - that's my slogan." - Huey Long

“Capitalism is the astounding belief that the most wickedest of men will do the most wickedest of things for the greatest good of everyone.” - John Maynard Keynes

“The difficulty lies, not in the new ideas, but in escaping from the old ones.” - John Maynard Keynes

"Although it is not true that all conservatives are stupid people, it is true that most stupid people are conservative." - John Stuart Mill

"All silencing of discussion is an assumption of infallibility." - John Stuart Mill

"Whatever crushes individuality is despotism, by whatever name it may be called and whether it professes to be enforcing the will of God or the injunctions of men." - John Stuart Mill

"Pleasure and freedom from pain, are the only things desirable as ends." - John Stuart Mill

"So Long as we do not harm others we should be free to think, speak, act, & live as we see fit, without molestation from individuals, law, or gov't."

- John Stuart Mill

“Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then he is not omnipotent. Is he able, but not willing? Then he is malevolent. Is he both able and willing? Then whence cometh evil? Is he neither able nor willing? Then why call him God?”

- Epicurus

"Death does not concern us, because as long as we exist, death is not here. And when it does come, we no longer exist."

- Epicurus

"We must exercise ourselves in the things which bring happiness, since, if that be present, we have everything, and, if that be absent, all our actions are directed toward attaining it."

- Epicurus

"Freedom and opportunity are precious gifts and the purpose of our politics is to expand them, for all our people."

- Ed Miliband

"While there's capitalism, there'll be socialism, because there is always a response to injustice."

- Ed Miliband

“America will never be destroyed from the outside. If we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves.” - Abraham Lincoln

“Those who deny freedom to others, deserve it not for themselves” -  Abraham Lincoln

“As President Franklin Delano Roosevelt reminded us: “The test of our progress is not whether we add more to the abundance of those who have much, it is whether we provide enough for those who have little.” - Bernie Sanders

“The American people are tired of Women.” - Bernie Sanders

"All tyrannies rule through fraud and force, but once the fraud is exposed they must rely exclusively on force." - George Orwell

"However much you deny the truth, the truth goes on existing." - George Orwell

“When one thinks of all the people who support or have supported Fascism, one stands amazed at their diversity. What a crew! Think of a programme which at any rate for a while could bring Hitler, Petain, Montagu Norman, Pavelitch, William Randolph Hearst, Streicher, Buchman, Ezra Pound, Juan March, Cocteau, Thyssen, Father Coughlin, the Mufti of Jerusalem, Arnold Lunn, Antonescu, Spengler, Beverley Nichols, Lady Houston, and Marinetti all into the same boat! But the clue is really very simple. They are all people with something to lose, or people who long for a hierarchical society and dread the prospect of a world of free and equal human beings. Behind all the ballyhoo that is talked about ‘godless’ Russia and the ‘materialism’ of the working class lies the simple intention of those with money or privileges to cling to them. Ditto, though it contains a partial truth, with all the talk about the worthlessness of social reconstruction not accompanied by a ‘change of heart’. The pious ones, from the Pope to the yogis of California, are great on the’ change of heart’, much more reassuring from their point of view than a change in the economic system.” - George Orwell

“The only thing we have to fear is fear itself.” - Franklin Roosevelt

“The liberty of a democracy is not safe if the people tolerated the growth of private power to a point where it becomes stronger than the democratic state itself. That in its essence is fascism: ownership of government by an individual, by a group, or any controlling private power.” - Franklin Roosevelt

“Democracy cannot succeed unless those who express their choice are prepared to choose wisely. The real safeguard of democracy, therefore, is education.” - Franklin Roosevelt

“In our hands is a placed power greater with their hoarded gold, greater than the might of armies magnified a thousand-fold. We can bring the birth the new world from the ashes of the old, for the union makes us strong.”

- Ralph Chaplin

"The working class owes all honor and respect to the first men who planted the standard of labor solidarity on the hostile frontier of unorganized industry."

- Ralph Chaplin

"It seems the most logical thing in the world to believe that the natural resources of the Earth, upon which the race depends for food, clothing and shelter, should be owned collectively by the race instead of being the private property of a few social parasites."

- Ralph Chaplin

“Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere.” - Martin Luther King Jr.

"Ultimately, saying that you don't care about privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different from saying you don't care about freedom of speech because you have nothing to say." - Edward Snowden

“These programs were never about terrorism: they're about economic spying, social control, and diplomatic manipulation. They're about power.” - Edward Snowden

“Under observation, we act less free, which means we effectively are less free.” - Edward Snowden

"The true white man lives in his basement, jerks off to anime porn, and reads my books"

- Julius Evola

"We long to have a home where civil freedoms are respected, where our children will not be subject to mass surveillance, abuse of human rights, political censorship and mass incarceration." - Joshua Wong

"No country is free unless it is democratic." - Kemal Atatürk

How I would've voted in elections
American Elections =

1700s
1789 - George Washington

1792 - Thomas Jefferson

1796 - Thomas Jefferson

1800s
1800 - Thomas Jefferson

1804 - Thomas Jefferson

1808 - James Madison

1812 - James Madison

1816 - James Monroe

1820 - James Monroe

1824 - Andrew Jackson

1828 - Andrew Jackson

1832 - Andrew Jackson

1836 - Martin Van Buren

1840 - Martin Van Buren

1844 - James K. Polk

1848 -  Martin Van Buren

1852 - John P. Hale

1856 - John C. Frémont

1860 - Abraham Lincoln

1864 - Abraham Lincoln

1868 - Ulysses S. Grant

1872 - Horace Greeley

1876 - Rutherford B. Hayes

1880 - James A. Garfield

1884 - James G. Blaine

1888 - Benjamin Harrison

1892 - James B. Weaver

1896 - William McKinley

1900s
1900 - Theodore Roosevelt

1904 - Theodore Roosevelt

1908 - William Howard Taft

1912 - William Howard Taft

1916 - Charles Evans Hughes

1920 - James M. Cox

1924 - Calvin Coolidge

1928 - Herbert Hoover

1932 - Herbert Hoover

1936 - Franklin D. Roosevelt

1940 - Franklin D. Roosevelt

1944 - Franklin D. Roosevelt

1948 - Harry Truman

1952 - Adlai Stevenson

1956 - Adlai Stevenson

1960 - John F. Kennedy

1964 - Lyndon B. Johnson

1968 - Hubert Humphrey

1972 - George McGovern

1976 - Jimmy Carter

1980 - Jimmy Carter

1984 - Walter Mondale

1988 - Michael Dukakis

1992 - Bill Clinton

1996 - Bill Clinton

2000s
2000: Al Gore

2004: John Kerry

2008: Barrack Obama

2012: Barrack Obama

2016: Bernie Sanders (No one)

2020: Bernie Sanders (In the DNC)  Joe Biden (In the election) German Elections =

1800s
1871 - - LGGWA 1874 - - SAPD 1877 - - SAPD 1878 - - SAPD 1881 - - SAPD 1884 - - SAPD 1887 - - SAPD 1890 - - SPD 1893 - - SPD 1898 - - SPD

1900s
1901 - - SPD 1907 - - SPD 1912 - - SPD 1919 - - SDP 1920 - - SDP 1924 (May) - - SDP 1924 (December) - -  SDP 1928 - - SPD 1930 - - SPD 1932 (July) - - SPD 1932 (November) - - SPD 1933 (March) - - SPD 1947 - - SPD 1953 - - SPD 1957 - - SPD 1961 - - SPD 1965 - - SPD 1969 - - SPD 1972 - - SPD 1976 - - SPD 1980 - - SPD 1983 - - SPD 1987 - - SPD 1990 - - SPD 1994 - - SPD 1998 - - SPD

2000s
2002 - - SPD 2005 - - SPD 2007 - - SPD 2009 - - SPD 2013 - - SPD 2017 - - SPD 2021 - - SPD

Things I like
My favorite youtube channels =

[[File:YouTube.png]] Political Youtube channels [[File:YouTube.png]]

 * [[File:Soc-h.png]] Shaun


 * [[File:Socdem.png]] Shoe0nHead


 * [[File:Kraut.png]] Kraut


 * [[File:Thar.png]] Three Arrows


 * [[File:Fem.png]] Knowing Better


 * [[File:Antcent.png]] JrEg


 * [[File:World.png]] CaspianReport

[[File:YouTube.png]] Non-political Youtube channels [[File:YouTube.png]]

 * [[File:CGP_Grey.png]] CGP Grey


 * [[File:Eastoryball.png]] Eastory


 * [[File:CodyFrank.png]] AlternateHistoryHub


 * [[File:ArmchairHistoryBall.png]] The Armchair Historian


 * [[File:Cball-Russia.png]] NFKRZ


 * [[File:ISPball.png]] iSorrowproductions


 * [[File:Gamer.png]] Mountain General


 * [[File:Gamer.png]] Alex The Rambler!


 * [[File:Histval.png]] History Matters


 * [[File:Cball-Austria.png]] Tapakapa

Favorite Hoi4 Mods =
 * [[File:Histval.png]] Countryballs Explained

Favorite Hoi4 Mods

 * [[File:World.png]] Toolpack


 * [[File:Burgsys_icon.png]] The New Order: Last Days of Europe


 * [[File:Necon.png]] Cold War Iron Curtain: A World Divided


 * [[File:Avant-garde.png]] Red Flood


 * [[File:World.png]] Random Country Placement


 * [[File:World.png]] Novum Vexillum


 * [[File:Cball-GermanEmpire.png]] Kaiserredux


 * [[File:World.png]] Player-Led Peace Conferences


 * [[File:Nazi.png]] Thousand Week Reich

Rating Cities
City Relations =

Good

 * [[File:Cball-US.png]] Kansas City, Missouri - I've lived here the majority of my life, and while I do go in and out of the city often, I will still always cherish this city.
 * [[File:Cball-US.png]] St. Joseph, Missouri - I have family here, so I visit this city often. The city in of itself is bust however, as there's not a lot of activities to do here, and has a notable amount of homeless and gun violence from what I've seen. But, I've never had a notably bad experience from visiting this city. So, despite all of that, because I go here often, it gets put here.
 * [[File:Cball-US.png]] Lee's Summit, Missouri - I have had notably good experiences visiting here, as I can recall several of them.
 * [[File:Cball-US.png]] St. Louis, Missouri - Had a really fun time going on the arch. However, the city itself is in pretty dire shape from what I've seen, with having one of the highest crimes rates in the city. The city itself is pretty crud, but I did have a good experience going here where I went.
 * [[File:Cball-US.png]] San Francisco, California - Despite everything that goes on in California and this city, it was a pretty fun experience from what I had visiting it, and I would definitely go again.

Meh

 * [[File:Cball-US.png]] Denver, Colorado - I've been here several times, but it was never really interesting or boring, can't really recall a whole lot from the trips I've been to going to this city.
 * [[File:Cball-US.png]] Independence, Missouri - Nothing of note worthy ever happened here. But, I did visit it, so that's something, I guess. I would say it was ok.

Bad
Cities I would like to do go =
 * [[File:Cball-US.png]] Platte City, Missouri - One of my family members got mugged here lmao. While nothing of value was stolen (I think it was just like 50$ I dunno), that experience just ruined it entirely for me.

Europe

 * [[File:Cball-Russia.png]] Moscow, Russia
 * [[File:Cball-Russia.png]] Saint Petersburg, Russia
 * [[File:Cball-UK.png]] London, Britain
 * [[File:Cball-France.png]] Paris, France

Asia

 * [[File:Cball-Japan.png]] Tokyo, Japan
 * [[File:Cball-China.png]] Beijing, China
 * [[File:Cball-China.png]] Shanghai, China
 * [[File:Cball-China.png]] Hong Kong, China
 * [[File:Cball-Taiwan.png]] Taipei, Taiwan

Americas

 * [[File:Cball-Canada.png]] Toronto, Canada
 * [[File:Cball-Canada.png]] Vancouver, Canada
 * [[File:Cball-US.png]] New York, United States

Political Parties & Countries
Parties I would vote for = ==== (Note: Just because I would vote for these parties doesn't mean I agree with everything they espouse, they just happen to have the most ideological overlap with my beliefs, and some of these parties are banned parties) ====

[[File:Cball-US.png]] United States
Democratic Party
 * [[File:Dem-CPC.png]] Congressional Progressive Caucus

[[File:Cball-Germany.png]] Germany
SPD

[[File:Cball-Mexico.png]] Mexico
Partido de la Revolución Democrática

[[File:Polandball.png]] Poland
Lewica

[[File:Cball-Venezuela.png]] Venezuela
Alianza Democrática
 * [[File:Socdem.png]] Acción Democrática

[[File:Cball-Hungary.png]] Hungary
Magyar Szocialista Párt

[[File:Cball-France.png]] France
Parti socialiste

[[File:Cball-Japan.png]] Japan
Social Democratic Party of Japan

[[File:Cball-Sweden.png]] Sweden
Sveriges Socialdemokratiska Arbetareparti

[[File:Cball-Taiwan.png]] Republic of China
Pan-Green Coalition

[[File:Cball-UK.png]] United Kingdom
Labour Party
 * [[File:Onenatlab.png]] One Nation Labour

[[File:Cball-Kazakhstan.png]] Kazakhstan
Democratic Choice of Kazakhstan

[[File:Cball-Norway.png]] Norway
Arbeidarpartiet

[[File:Cball-Finland.png]] Finland
Suomen sosialidemokraattinen puolue

[[File:Cball-North_Korea.png]] North Korea
Free Joseon

[[File:Castro.png]] Cuba
Social Democratic Co-ordination of Cuba

[[File:Cball-South_Korea.png]] South Korea
Justice Party

[[File:Cball-HongKong.png]] Hong Kong
Pro-Democracy Camp
 * [[File:Socdem.png]] League of Social Democrats

[[File:Cball-China.png]] People's Republic of China
Democracy Party of China

[[File:Cball-Canada.png]] Canada
New Democratic Party

[[File:Cball-Russia.png]] Russia
Russia of the Future

[[File:Cball-Belarus.png]] Belarus
Anti-Lukashenko Parties
 * [[File:Socdem.png]] Belarusian Social Democratic Party

[[File:ROT.png]] Turkey
Republican People's Party Countries in need of change =

Countries will be ranked on their status, and the format goes like this: (Political structure, Economic Structure, and Social structure) ranging from these icons (NOTE, THIS IS A WIP)
//////

Based countries, little to no changes necessary

 * [[File:Cball-Denmark.png]] Denmark ([[File:Mega_Yes-icon.png]]/[[File:Mega_Yes-icon.png]]/[[File:Mega_Yes-icon.png]])
 * [[File:Cball-Sweden.png]] Sweden ([[File:Mega_Yes-icon.png]]/[[File:Mega_Yes-icon.png]]/[[File:Mega_Yes-icon.png]])
 * [[File:Cball-Norway.png]] Norway ([[File:Mega_Yes-icon.png]]/[[File:Mega_Yes-icon.png]]/[[File:Mega_Yes-icon.png]])
 * [[File:Cball-Iceland.png]] Iceland ([[File:Mega_Yes-icon.png]]/[[File:Mega_Yes-icon.png]]/[[File:Mega_Yes-icon.png]])
 * [[File:Cball-Finland.png]] Finland ([[File:Mega_Yes-icon.png]]/[[File:Mega_Yes-icon.png]]/[[File:Mega_Yes-icon.png]])
 * [[File:Cball-Switzerland.png]] Switzerland ([[File:Mega_Yes-icon.png]]/[[File:Kinda Yes-icon.png]]/[[File:Mega_Yes-icon.png]])
 * [[File:Cball-Austria.png]] Austria ([[File:Mega_Yes-icon.png]]/[[File:Mega_Yes-icon.png]]/[[File:Mega_Yes-icon.png]])
 * [[File:Cball-Germany.png]] Germany ([[File:Mega_Yes-icon.png]]/[[File:Mega_Yes-icon.png]]/[[File:Mega_Yes-icon.png]])
 * [[File:Cball-Netherlands.png]] Netherlands ([[File:Mega_Yes-icon.png]]/[[File:Mega_Yes-icon.png]]/[[File:Mega_Yes-icon.png]])
 * [[File:Cball-Canada.png]] Canada ([[File:Kinda Yes-icon.png]]/[[File:Kinda Yes-icon.png]]/[[File:Mega_Yes-icon.png]])
 * [[File:Cball-Belgium.png]] Belgium ([[File:Mega_Yes-icon.png]]/[[File:Mega_Yes-icon.png]]/[[File:Mega_Yes-icon.png]])
 * [[File:Cball-Czechia.png]] Czechia ([[File:Mega_Yes-icon.png]]/[[File:Yes-icon.png]]/[[File:Mega_Yes-icon.png]])
 * [[File:Cball-Ireland.png]] Ireland ([[File:Mega_Yes-icon.png]]/[[File:Mega_Yes-icon.png]]/[[File:Mega_Yes-icon.png]])
 * [[File:Cball-France.png]] France ([[File:Mega_Yes-icon.png]]/[[File:Mega_Yes-icon.png]]/[[File:Mega_Yes-icon.png]])
 * [[File:Cball-Spain.png]] Spain ([[File:Kinda Yes-icon.png]]/[[File:Mega_Yes-icon.png]]/[[File:Mega_Yes-icon.png]])

Good, in need of a few tweaks

 * [[File:Cball-Newz.png]] New Zealand
 * [[File:Cball-Uruguay.png]] Uruguay ([[File:Mega_Yes-icon.png]]/[[File:Kinda Yes-icon.png]]/[[File:Mega_Yes-icon.png]])
 * [[File:Cball-Australia.png]] Australia
 * [[File:Cball-Taiwan.png]] Taiwan ([[File:Yes-icon.png]]/[[File:Kinda Yes-icon.png]]/[[File:Mega_Yes-icon.png]])

Ok, but in need of reform

 * [[File:Cball-US.png]] United States ([[File:Kinda No-icon.png]]/[[File:Kinda No-icon.png]]/[[File:Yes-icon.png]])
 * [[File:Cball-Chile.png]] Chile
 * [[File:Cball-UK.png]] United Kingdom ([[File:Kinda No-icon.png]]/[[File:Kinda Yes-icon.png]]/[[File:Yes-icon.png]])

Bad, in need of noticeable reform

 * [[File:Cball-Japan.png]] Japan ([[File:No-icon.png]]/[[File:Kinda No-icon.png]]/[[File:No-icon.png]])
 * [[File:Cball-South_Korea.png]] South Korea ([[File:No-icon.png]]/[[File:Kinda No-icon.png]]/[[File:No-icon.png]])
 * [[File:Cball-Ukraine.png]] Ukraine ([[File:No-icon.png]]/[[File:No-icon.png]]/[[File:No-icon.png]])
 * [[File:Cball-Poland.png]] Poland ([[File:No-icon.png]]/[[File:Yes-icon.png]]/[[File:No-icon.png]])
 * [[File:Cball-Hungary.png]] Hungary ([[File:No-icon.png]]/[[File:Kinda No-icon.png]]/[[File:No-icon.png]])
 * [[File:Cball-Italy.png]] Italy ([[File:No-icon.png]]/[[File:No-icon.png]]/[[File:No-icon.png]])
 * [[File:Cball-Singapore.png]] Singapore ([[File:No-icon.png]]/[[File:Yes-icon.png]]/[[File:No-icon.png]])
 * [[File:Cball-Mexico.png]] Mexico ([[File:No-icon.png]]/[[File:No-icon.png]]/[[File:No-icon.png]])

Terrible, burn the entire system to the ground and start from new

 * [[File:Cball-Russia.png]] Russia ([[File:Mega No-icon.png]]/[[File:Mega No-icon.png]]/[[File:Mega No-icon.png]])
 * [[File:Cball-North_Korea.png]] North Korea ([[File:Mega No-icon.png]]/[[File:Mega No-icon.png]]/[[File:Mega No-icon.png]])
 * [[File:Zio.png]] Israel ([[File:Mega No-icon.png]]/[[File:Kinda No-icon.png]]/[[File:Yes-icon.png]])
 * [[File:Cball-Palestine.png]] Palestine ([[File:Mega No-icon.png]]/[[File:Mega No-icon.png]]/[[File:Mega No-icon.png]])
 * [[File:Cball-Iran.png]] Iran ([[File:Mega No-icon.png]]/[[File:Mega No-icon.png]]/[[File:Mega No-icon.png]])
 * [[File:Cball-Brazil.png]] Brazil ([[File:No-icon.png]]/[[File:Mega No-icon.png]]/[[File:Mega No-icon.png]])
 * [[File:Cball-Belarus.png]] Belarus ([[File:Mega No-icon.png]]/[[File:Yes-icon.png]]/[[File:Mega No-icon.png]])
 * [[File:Cball-China.png]] People's Republic of China ([[File:Mega No-icon.png]]/[[File:Mega No-icon.png]]/[[File:Mega No-icon.png]])
 * [[File:Cball-Taliban.png]] Afghanistan ([[File:Mega No-icon.png]]/[[File:Mega No-icon.png]]/[[File:Mega No-icon.png]])
 * [[File:Castro.png]] Cuba ([[File:Mega No-icon.png]]/[[File:Kinda No-icon.png]]/[[File:No-icon.png]])
 * [[File:Cball-Saudi.png]] Saudi Arabia ([[File:Mega No-icon.png]]/[[File:Mega No-icon.png]]/[[File:Mega No-icon.png]])
 * [[File:Chavismo.png]] Venezuela
 * [[File:ROT.png]] Turkey ([[File:No-icon.png]]/[[File:Kinda No-icon.png]]/[[File:Mega No-icon.png]])
 * [[File:Cball-Kazakhstan.png]] Kazakhstan ([[File:Mega No-icon.png]]/[[File:Mega No-icon.png]]/[[File:Mega No-icon.png]])
 * [[File:Cball-AfricanUnion.png]] A lot of Africa
 * [[File:Thailand.png]] Thailand
 * [[File:Cball-Turkmenistan.png]] Turkmenistan ([[File:Mega No-icon.png]]/[[File:Mega No-icon.png]]/[[File:Mega No-icon.png]])
 * [[File:Cball-Ethiopia.png]] Ethiopia
 * [[File:Cball-Somalia.png]] Somalia
 * [[File:Cball-Egypt.png]] Egypt
 * [[File:Cball-Myanmar.png]] Myammar

Positive

 * [[File:NDP icon.png]] New Democratic Party - Pretty typical socdem party, so you know what I'm about to say right now, A B S O L U T E L Y B A S E D!
 * [[File:USA_PirateParty.png]] United States Pirate Party - Absolutely based, and chad. Like, how is it even this possible to each this level of based?
 * [[File:Dem-CPC.png]] Congressional Progressive Caucus - One of the truly based parties in the United States, It's ashamed the establishment actively works against your causes. However, focuses a lot on this meaningless culture war a bit too much, which is understandable, but still. Outside of that, you're basically based.
 * [[File:ForwardParty.png]] American Forward Party - Well I may have disagreements, I still respect you as a political party. Yang is kinda meh however.

Neutral

 * [[File:Demcr.png]] Democratic Party - I seriously cannot believe I have to work with this party. The only tolerable faction within this party is the progressive caucus. All other wings are moderately to severely cringe. With having most of the criticisms I have for the republican party.
 * [[File:GreensUS.png]] Green Party USA - I honestly don't know much about your party or its members, but you seem to be slightly more tolerable. Although, full out socialism is not desirable, and your social policies are too far left.

Negative

 * [[File:RepubUS.png]] Republican Party - Fuck off, just because I hate the establishment doesn't mean I like you. You are my anti-thesis. Corporate welfare, ever increasing statism with disregard for civil liberties, foreign interventionism, isolationism, and free-market capitalism. Everything, and I mean EVERYTHING, is just awful.
 * [[File:USASolidarity.png]] American Solidarity Party - Religious crazies, better than most but still something I would never vote for.
 * [[File:USLibertarians.png]] Libertarian Party - Based social views, but that's pretty much it. Pretty much nothing good, and many of you guys are just republicans who want to do drugs. You would single handedly crash the US economy if you ever got into power.
 * [[File:Dsa.png]] Democratic Socialists of America - What a bunch of radlibs, more obsessed with pointless culture war nonsense than economics.
 * [[File:Fuente.png]] America First - Nick Fuentes is a Neo-Nazi, and, funnily enough, is not even white.
 * [[File:Rockwell.png]] American Nazi Party - Neo-Nazis are absolute clowns.
 * [[File:Constitution_Party_(US).png]] Constitution Party - Unhinged social conservatism and fiscal conservatism, literally my political opposite.
 * [[File:Castro.png]] Communist Party of Cuba - Any American that supports you is a complete lolcow, have fun living in a country that doesn't respect human rights compared to the United States.

Positive

 * [[File:Nordmodel.png]] Sveriges Socialdemokratiska Arbetareparti - Thanks for being one the main inspirations! And, the ideology is pretty based.
 * [[File:Lewica.png]] Lewica - Not the best, but better than the current Polish government.

Neutral

 * [[File:UKLab.png]] Labour Party - The soft left is good, every other faction basically sucks.
 * [[File:Demsocstar.png]] Die Linke - Based left-wing populist and opposition towards the EU's neoliberal policies, everything else here isn't good though. And, from what I've read, you have pretty unrealistic fiscal policies as well.

Negative

 * [[File:Wagenknecht.png]] Aufstehen - Take anything remotely good about Die Linke, remove it, and you get this. Russophilic party that is socially conservative, lmao. Basically, standard old leftist.

Positive

 * [[File:Socdem.png]] Social Democratic Party of Japan - The best party Japanese politics has to offer. And, pretty based as well.
 * [[File:Synclib.png]] Constitutional Democratic Party of Japan - A bit moderate, but ehh... Preferable to the LDP.
 * [[File:PanGreenTW.png]] Pan-Green Coalition - Keep standing up for Taiwanese independence, full and critical support goes to you!
 * [[File:JusticeParty.png]] Justice Party - Pretty based for South Korea, shame left-wing politics aren't too popular there.
 * [[File:Cball-HongKong-BlackBauhinia.png]] Pro-Democracy Camp - I will wholeheartedly support you against the CCP.
 * [[File:Liberal Democracy.png]] Democracy Party of China - Imagine if the protestors succeeded... What only could've been. Shame brainwashed 50 cent army retards keep twisting the facts and sucking the dick of the Chinese Communist Party.
 * [[File:Socdem.png]] Belarusian Social Democratic Party - Lukashenko is a corrupt dictator and Putin puppet, keep protesting!
 * [[File:RussiaOfTheFuture.png]] Russia of the Future - Keep exposing the truth about Russia United, I have faith you can overthrow the Russian government!

Neutral

 * [[File:JapCom.png]] Japanese Communist Party - Social progressivism is cool, everything else is cringe. It does surprise me how Japan has such an active socialist party in their politics given their politics of the country though.

Negative

 * [[File:LDP(Japan).png]] Liberal Democratic Party of Japan - Neocon dick sucking neo-imperialist party.
 * [[File:PeoplePowerParty.png]] People's Power Party -
 * [[File:Dengf.png]] Chinese Communist Party - The amount of leftists who support you just because you oppose atlanticism is astounding, and aren't actually leftists if they do.
 * [[File:NeoShowa.png]] Nippon Kaigi - Neo-nazi cult, do I need to say more?

How to Draw
MyFlagUpdatedMatt.png
 * 1) Draw a ball.
 * 2) Fill the backround with blue.
 * 3) Draw a red cross with white outlines.
 * 4) Draw a red circle in the middle.
 * 5) Draw a rose in the middle of the red circle.
 * 6) Draw the eyes.

You're done!

Ideological Relations
(Note: If you want to add me to your page using ideological icons, use these: (//) Ideological Relations= WIP Self-Insert Relations= (Note: This is purely ideological, unless you're a massive dick/larper)

Good

 * [[File:Kirblyism-Icon.png]] Kirbly ([[File:Socgeo.png]]/[[File:Transh.png]])- Very based progressivism. Not sure about this whole world federalism and transhumanism thing though. But I can admire your futuristic world-view, even if it is far-fetched. You're pretty based.


 * [[File:Ninjack.png]] Ninjack-Aus ([[File:Libms.png]]/[[File:World_Federalism2.png]]) - You have pretty good cultural views, and good economics. although military intervention is cringe. You seem like a good person


 * [[File:Mebrouk.png]] Mebrouk ([[File:Socdem.png]]/[[File:Islamic_Liberalism.png]]) - We're basically the same, very based ideologically wise. Although, a religious democracy for me is really eh considering everything I've said about it, but in your case it would be the most practical.


 * [[File:BeryAbLib.png]] BeryAb ([[File:NeoClib.png]]/[[File:Nalib.png]]) - For someone whose right-libertarian leaning, you're pretty based. Our principles our the same but our end goals are different. Overall, good. (Also massive shame your reddit account got terminated out of no where, rip)


 * [[File:YellingLiber.png]] YellingYowie ([[File:Socliber.png]]/[[File:Neobert.png]]) - While your economics and cultural stances are acceptable, your foreign policy is severely misguided. Like, how do you plan on waging war in countries while also having a small government?


 * [[File:Liberal-icon.png]] Liberal ([[File:Scientocracy_Small.png]]/[[File:Socdem.png]]) - I like what I see here, based!


 * [[File:Enaysikey.png]] Enaysikey ([[File:Socliber.png]]/[[File:Neotech.png]]) - Welfare libertarian, nice. Although being into eugenics is weird.


 * [[File:Avelicius.png]] Joogotakensaad ([[File:Soccap.png]]/[[File:Progconf.png]]) - Welfare capitalist, based.


 * [[File:Cflski.png]] Sykar Socialist ([[File:3princ.png]]/[[File:Socdem.png]]) - Your economics don't sound bad and you also hate the PRC as well, so you're pretty well off in my book.


 * [[File:JudePortrait.png]] High Priest Jude ([[File:Dsa.png]]/[[File:Leftpop-0.png]]) - DemSoc, tolerable. Based cultural views too.


 * [[File:TonyNew.png]] Tony567 ([[File:Marketsoc.png]]/[[File:Sep.png]]) - Really weird set of beliefs. Market socialism is pretty eh, as an economy centered around workers co-ops has shown to be the most successful form of socialism, but still not desirable. Along with this separatism stuff.


 * [[File:Vonali.png]] Vonali ([[File:Socliber.png]]/[[File:Civlibert.png]]) - Progressive Social Libertarianism, not bad.


 * [[File:Skyrum536.png]] Skyrum536 ([[File:Demsocstar.png]]/[[File:Prog.png]]) - DemSoc, against authoritarianism and is a democratic federalist. Nice.


 * [[File:EvolvingSoc.png]] DuyQuangNguyenPham ([[File:Marketsoc.png]]/[[File:Civnat.png]]) - A more leftist version of me, I agree with him on a lot of stuff.


 * [[File:TheIced.png]] The Iced ([[File:Georgist.png]]/[[File:Transh.png]]) - Too reliant on free markets but LVT is based, and so is cultural progressivism.


 * [[File:SamKibGuy_icon_.png]] SamkibGuy ([[File:Republicanismpix.png]]/[[File:Thar.png]]) - Your ideology is good, but I don't understand how you can like authoritarian communists while fighting for democracy at the same time. Atleast we agree on Social democracy which is based.


 * [[File:Yoda8soup.png]] Yoda8soup ([[File:Socgeo.png]]/[[File:Ecosoc.png]]) - Your economics for me personally are too left-wing, but your progressivism, and environmentalism are both very based.


 * [[File:RabbitIcon.png]] ComradeRabit95 ([[File:Demsocstar.png]]/[[File:Leftnat.png]]) - Too lefty, but not bad. Don't know a whole lot about your ideology since you don't have anything on your page, just going off your ideologies alone.


 * [[File:Silasf.png]] Sorcersilas is here ([[File:Distributist.png]]/[[File:Libms.png]]) - I prefer unions, but still, a decently good ideology.


 * [[file:Syntridem2.png]] Applethesky2021 ([[File:Cdem.png]]/[[File:Georgist.png]]) - I'd like to think you're just a more socially conservative and nationalistic version of me, which you are. Not the worst, at least we both oppose totalitarian evils, have a mutual disliking of globalism, and hate neoliberal capitalism. So, this is the highest I can put a conservative person, even if you might not respect my individualism.


 * [[File:Liberalsoc.png]] TheJester ([[File:Liberalsoc.png]]/[[File:Marketsoc.png]]) - Too left-wing for me personally, but still a decently based ideology. Love your cultural takes.


 * [[File:NSL.png]] Pirate Tails ([[File:Natprog.png]]/[[File:Liberaltarianism.png]]) - Better than the Polish government has to offer, a bit too nationalist, but you'd work just fine for were you are.


 * [[File:Vamp.png]] DerVampir666 ([[File:Distlib.png]]/[[File:Farm.png]]/[[File:Geolib.png]]) - Your ideas are pretty interesting. Not a fan of this whole cultural protectionism crap, free-trade, or agrarianism, though. But, your social values are good I suppose. Interesting for a libertarian market socialist.


 * [[File:Uzarashvilism.png]] Uzarash ([[File:Progconf.png]]/[[File:Demsocstar.png]]) - We have a lot of common enemies on foreign policy, but your more traditional views are cringe. At least we both hate China and Russia.


 * [[File:Glencoe.png]] Glencoe13 ([[File:Liberalsoc.png]]/[[File:Steinval.png]]/[[File:Minmut.png]]) - Libertarian socialism to me is a big meh. Tolerable compared to the status quo, but still not diserable for me personally, not the worst though.


 * [[File:Hoffmanism.png.png]] Askanidiot1223 - You may be long gone because the cringe janny banned you, but I think it would be unfair for me not to credit some of the things I took from your page as inspiration, rest in power o7

Meh

 * [[File:Sweatingcup.png]] SweatingCup2632 ([[File:Sec.png]]/[[File:Newkeynes.png]]) - Bootlicker, but not the worst.


 * [[File:Neoairisu.png]] SumisuAirisu ([[File:Demcon.png]]/[[File:Anqueer.png]]) - Meh honestly, not a fan of anarchism but could be worse.


 * [[File:Councilguy2.png]] Councilguy ([[File:Anpostleft.png]]/[[File:Ego.png]])- Not fond of egoism, but you're a nice user.


 * [[File:Ultroneism.png]] LordCompost86 ([[File:Ego.png]]/[[File:Skepticism.png]]) - Obviously not a fan of this ideology or egoism, but you seem like a nice person.


 * [[File:PostChronic.png]] ChronicFemcel ([[File:Anpostleft.png]]/[[File:Post-an.png]]) - Cringe egoist but nice person.


 * [[File:Neotechnocracy.png]] BasedCringeOrMeh ([[File:Neotechnocracy.png]]/[[File:Transh.png]])- Pretty based economically and culturally, but authoritarianism isn't based and democracy is cool.


 * [[File:Nivballf.png]] Niveous Laccolith ([[File:Ego.png]]/[[File:Anpostleft.png]]) - Anarchism is cringe. But is socially progressive.


 * [[File:Ancom_Furry.png]] ThisIsMyUsernameAAAA ([[File:Ancom.png]]/[[File:Antifa.png]]) - Based cultural values, but being an ancom isn't helping.


 * [[File:Affiliated-grump.png]] Affiliated ([[File:Postciv.png]]/[[File:Econil.png]]) - Some post civilization leftist, wonky and funny tbh.


 * [[File:TDRH.png]] ThatDudeRightHere ([[File:Liberalconservative.png]]/[[File:Cdem.png]]) - Not a whole lot to say about this, moderate conservativism is whatever to be honest. We do have a lot in common in interests through so that's cool.


 * [[File:Bsaheedism-icon.png]] Bsaheed527 ([[File:Post-an.png]]/[[File:Anpostleft.png]]) - Yeah, I'm really unsure what to say about this ideology. You as a person though, are chill.


 * [[File:Ashley.png]] AshleyHere ([[File:Libsoc.png]]/[[File:Indiv.png]]) - I honestly like your new ideological development. Still not great, but better than what it was before. Libertarian socialism atleast is a step up.


 * [[File:TipuiSmall.png]] Tipui ([[File:Ego.png]]/[[File:Anpostleft.png]]) - Another egoist, okay this is getting out of hand. I will say your earlier years were quite based, if that means anything.


 * [[File:M99.png]] M99.exe ([[File:Synd.png]]/[[File:Ormarxf.png]]) - A communist, albeit not the worst one I've seen and seems to be friendly towards socdems, atleast you're pragmatic.


 * [[File:AbEntball.png]] The Grand Anarch ([[File:Post-an.png]]/[[File:Hedonism-cloud.png]]) - So you managed to make your ideology even more crazy, but honestly a step up from your last.


 * [[File:Drunkardsdjxfh.png]] Stk ([[File:Neoliberal-icon.png]]/[[File:Libhawk.png]]) - Doesn't fail in every regard, so gets refrained from putting in cringe. But still, neoliberal economics is cringe, and being a liberal hawk is no better than a Neoconservative.


 * [[File:And3 .png]] And3 ([[File:Commie.png]]/[[File:Globnat.png]]/[[File:Radenv.png]]) - Communism and anarchism are cringe for me, sorry. Progressivism and international co-operation are net positives.


 * [[File:S1984.png]] Savvas1984 ([[File:Statlib.png]]/[[File:Transh.png]]) - You're an unironic state liberal? Only good thing is your technological take.


 * [[File:PagTheo.png]] Pantheon ([[File:Unimon.png]]/[[File:SocDist.png]]) - Surprisingly based economics, and I like civil libertarianism. But man, that monarchism stuff has to go. Also, is a vaushite as well.


 * [[File:Ioist.png]] Iooootheanarchist ([[File:Anqueer.png]]/[[File:Antifa.png]]) - Just your typical anarshit. Also, is weirdly an interventionist as well? Makes sense considering they are a vaushite. Atleast you have seemingly tolerable cultural takes.


 * [[File:InexUser.png.png]] Inexistent-User ([[File:Soctrans.png]]/[[File:Technocracy.png]]) - The only bit I really like about this is your endorsement of technological development, everything else is pretty cringe though.


 * [[File:TheElectricBomb.png]] TheElectricBomb ([[File:Lpop.png]]/[[File:Dsa.png]]) - Hating NATO and socialism is kinda cringe. But, I did indeed epically troll you.


 * [[File:Novochirotesla.png]] Chirotesla ([[File:Marketsoc.png]]/[[File:Consocf.png]]) - Your ideology may be one of the least bad out of the old leftists, but it has seriously gotten worse over time. Too left-wing on economics. Being anti-imperialist, environmentalist, a fair-trade protectionist, pro-choice, cultural integration that focuses more on culture tolerance, and more tolerant on LGBT issues than your other friends, which are all welcome. But, overall, too conservative for my liking.


 * [[File:Quark.png]] Quark ([[File:StateathFedora.png]]/[[File:Socgeo.png]]) - Hating religion is fine but state atheism is :skull:, and also, neoliberalism is barf.


 * [[File:SST-icon.png]] ShadowRaiden ([[File:Progconsoc.png]]/[[File:Distributist.png]]) - As much as I disagree with some of your cultural takes, I understand a lot of your political leanings more than ever now. And, I completely support your decision to leave, any sane person should leave this community ASAP to avoid the general garbage fire that it quite frankly is.


 * [[File:Anglo-Germanic_Socialist.png]] Anglo-germanic socialist ([[File:Ormarxf.png]]/[[File:Progress.png]]) - Progressivism is hella based, but Marxism isn't.


 * [[File:TheFed.png]] TheFedGuy101 ([[File:CathDem.png]]/[[File:ClassDistr.png]]) - Economically wise, we somewhat match each other. But, everything else I see here is cringe, as I value my own individual worth over pointless things like organized religion or conservatism.


 * [[File:MrsVzrFlag.png]] MarsVizir [[File:MrsVzr2.png]] ([[File:Prog.png]]/[[File:Demsocstar.png]]/[[File:World Federalism2.png]]) - I don't hate or love any of your ideas, I dislike how you idolize utopian economics though. And, while alter-globalism is good, world federalism is unnecessary. But, progressivism is something I can get behind.


 * [[File:Amm1.png]] Am_m ([[File:Kemal.png]]/[[File:Natprog.png]]/[[File:Socauth.png]]) - I guess your economics are ok, but your statist values are iffy. I'm not a fan of authoritarianism obviously. Secularism and holding relatively socially progressive views is good though.
 * [[File:Rebel Alliance.png]] CarbynSobek ([[File:Leftnat.png]]/[[File:Statesoc.png]]/[[File:Lpop.png]]) - Based left-wing nationalism and populism, but I'm not in fan of a state-guided economy under socialism, that has always lead to economic stagnation and it just being a glorified version of state capitalism. Supporting progressive policies like abortion rights and feminism is based though.

Not Good

 * [[File:Typicalfan2.png]] Typicalfan4 ([[File:Altl.png]]/[[File:Natcon.png]]) - Typical alt-lite, but still is a moderate.


 * [[File:USLibertarians.png]] NotADopeMan ([[File:Chilib.png]]/[[File:Obj.png]]) - A libertarian whose completely opposed to state intervention? Cringe, albeit not the worst thing I've seen. It's still pretty bad.


 * [[File:Libcon.png]] ResponsibleCitizen ([[File:Libcon.png]]/[[File:Conlib.png]]) - Typical libcon.


 * [[File:SomeCrusade.png]] SomeCrusader1224 ([[File:Trad.png]]/[[File:Conlib.png]]) - This dude is my opposite in almost every way other than government, not a bad person though.


 * [[File:Smelegem.png]] Smelegem ([[File:MLM.png]]/[[File:Islamic_Democracy.png]]) - Unironic maoist. Literally one of the worst communists to ever exist in the history of ever with the worst economics that I've ever heard. Cool person though ig.


 * [[File:RojanALT.PNG]] Rojo346 ([[File:Conlib.png]]/[[File:Socliber.png]]) - Typical conservative, nahhhh... You as a person are fine though.


 * [[File:NeoLibtard.png]] ANewDude ([[File:Neoliberal-icon.png]]/[[File:Progressive_Imperialism.png]]) - Illiterate neoliberal retard who thinks hating neoliberalism means hating the global poor.


 * [[File:Distributist.png]] Dumnorix ([[File:Distributist.png]]/[[File:Trad.png]]) - Cringe conservative, but it's not everyday you see a traditionalist libleft.


 * [[File:JoeyFloppa_boo.png]] JoeyFloppa ([[File:Libcon.png]]/[[File:Austrobert.png]]) - I hardly see how you're an Individualist.


 * [[File:Danielspaniel-Icon.png]] Danieltenspaniel ([[File:ML.png]]/[[File:StateathFedora.png]]) - A tankie who is atleast socially progressive.


 * [[File:MossadTest.png]] Mossad ([[File:Relzion.png]]/[[File:Conlib.png]]) - A religious conservative who stands for Israel. Basically PragerUism.


 * [[File:Azathoth.png]] Azathoth ([[File:Post-an.png]]/[[File:CountEn.png]]) - Nothing against you but you reject enlightenment thinking and are a reactionary anarchist, but you're not even socially conservative so you don't get put in the lowest tier.


 * [[File:Statlibertarian.png]] SuddenWriter - ([[File:Libertarian.png]]/[[File:Anticommunism.png]]) - I refuse to believe this is anything other than a meme lmao.


 * [[File:Cball-France-Beret.png]] Cheebow8 ([[File:Conservative.png]]/[[File:Trumpism.png]]) - Yeah, I'm basically not convinced by anything I read on this page. Conservatism is cringe and soy. Although, you are very friendly from what I've observed, I will give you that.


 * [[File:MLM.png]] Marsvner ([[File:MLM.png]]/[[File:Ultraprogressivism.png]]/[[File:WokeCommiesucc.png]]) - Bruh Maoism is actual ass, atleast you don't seem authoritarian but come on now, even the Chinese abandoned it for a reason.


 * [[File:DN_Adm.png]] DarknightYuusha-11 ([[File:Consocf.png]]/[[File:Marketsoc.png]]) - Basically, everything I said about Shadow could be applied to you, with there being not a whole of differences. Too left-wing on economics, first world cultural conservatism, and being really lenient on authoritarianism are really cringe for me.
 * [[File:Balodismconsmall.png]] IvarBalodis ([[File:Guildsoc.png]]/[[File:Progconsoc.png]]) - Corporatism is good, even if too left-wing. But, still too socially conservative for my taste. And, once again, anti-individualism is garbage.
 * [[File:Xenoassemblage.png]] Xenosystems - ([[File:ColdGod.png]]/[[File:CybNil.png]]/[[File:POSTHUMANISMICON.png]]/[[File:Fut2.png]]) - You have interesting beliefs to say the least. The only thing I can really say that is tolerable about this ideology is its seemingly being progressive. Outside of that, I agree with next to nothing with this fever dream you call an ideology.
 * [[File:Noel21231-icon.png]] Noel21231 ([[File:Natcon.png]]/[[File:Plcn2.png]]/[[File:Soccap.png]]) - Hardcore conservatism hardly makes up for your economics. Atleast you seem *somewhat* (not really saying a whole lot btw) better.


 * [[File:Soyjak.png]] AnAnonBoi123 ([[File:Postconan.png]]/[[File:Anti-Globalism.png]]/[[File:Kak.png]]) - You seem to be a lot better now, so you get put out of the last category. However, indigenous supremacy and soyraging at people who even support Taiwan over the ccp is cringe. Not to mention how much you soyraged at me.

Objectively Cringe Garbage

 * [[File:KaiserKlaus.png]] KaiserKlausMouse ([[File:PanGerman.png]]/[[File:Cball-CSA.png]]/[[File:NeoFash.png]]) - Cringy larping fed.


 * [[File:Ukraiana.png]] Ukraiana ([[File:Nazi.png]]/[[File:Whitesup.png]]/[[File:Altr.png]]) - 💀


 * [[File:MedDavilanda.png]] Davilanda13 ([[File:Ancapf.png]]/[[File:Reactcross.png]]) - What a steaming pile of horseshit of an ideology. Ancaps are super edgy.


 * [[File:ReactionaryCentrism6.png]] Bannned ([[File:Cfash.png]]/[[File:Christy.png]]) - Firstly, this "centrist" was hardly a centrist. Secondly, Cringe edgelord larper. Glad SumisuAirisu made you live up to your username. Good riddance lol.


 * [[File:Coindorni-icon-new.png]] Coindorni ([[File:Ancapf.png]]/[[File:Reactcross.png]]) - Another reactionary ancap, how much of you guys just are secretly fascists in denial?


 * [[File:Vizantion-Storm.png]] TheHellenicStorm ([[File:Strasser.png]]/[[File:Neonazi_ball.png]]/[[File:Flang.png]]) - Nazi, credit where credit is due though you're an actual national socialist. Still a Nazi, which is fucking cringe, retarded, and most definitely a larp.


 * [[File:OrthReactPaleominarchist.png]] BasedRussianMikuru ([[File:Feud.png]]/[[File:Orth.png]]) - A reactionary theocratic larper who has defended feudalism. Overall very cringe and weird.


 * [[File:DragonRed.png]] DragonRed ([[File:Fashkemal.png]]/[[File:Ittihad.png]]) - Genocide denier and supports several reactionary regimes like Russia and China for being anti-west, turkish nazbol lmao.


 * [[File:Heinrich_Cheung.png]] Heinrich Cheung ([[File:Neonazi_ball.png]]/[[File:Nazcap-Hat.png]]) - So this is the "superior aryan master race" I've heard so highly about, huh? Totally not a larp.


 * [[File:Classfash.png]] LKR15tye ([[File:Euras.png]]//[[File:Fash.png]]) - Fashoid. "He hates me as much as he hates the nazis according to his page". Your ideology has lead to nothing but death, destruction, and misery for all that had to suffer under it.


 * [[File:Duckf.png]] Duck-Citizen ([[File:Ancapf.png]]/[[File:Reactcross.png]]) - ancap? check. reactionary? check. vomit worthy ideology? check.


 * [[File:TolkienIRLicon.png]] Tolkien_IRL ([[File:Abmon.png]]/[[File:Nazcap-Hat.png]]) - If this serious, I have actually zero words.


 * [[File:Palostius.png]] Palostius ([[File:Ingsocf.png]]/[[File:Reactcross.png]]/[[File:Darwinist.png]]/[[File:Mansphere.png]]) - Sexist incel larper. How long as your ass been without a shower, holy shit. This entire dude's personality is gloating his shit takes.


 * [[File:Dualusf.png]] DualPlay1 ([[File:Statesoc.png]]/[[File:StateathFedora.png]]) - A conservative authoritarian communist. Basically just a cringier version of quark.


 * [[File:EpicConIcon.png]] NazBolGANG12 ([[File:Tradcon.png]]/[[File:Distributist.png]]) - Ok, on a serious note, you're not getting put here because of your personality but because of your ideology. Your personality is fine, your ideology on the other hand is very cringe.


 * [[File:Socnat.png]] AmericanFuturist ([[File:Socnat.png]]/[[File:Fash.png]]) - Was cringe the first time, is still cringe the second time.


 * [[File:Baconsalad123_Icon.png]] Baconsalad123 ([[File:Sorelia.png]]/[[File:Nazi.png]]) - Racial nationalism, totalitarianism, fascism. Easily one of the most dystopian self-inserts on this site.


 * [[File:Svs.png]] SNEEDIVS ([[File:Catheo.png]]/[[File:Monarch.png]]) - Bruh why are there so many reactards on this site. I think this dude actually thinks it's the 10th century or something.


 * [[File:NatDem.png]] Black drone ([[File:Authcap.png]]/[[File:Mansphere.png]]/[[File:Rpop-tinfoilhat.png]]/[[File:Plcn2.png]]) - Now, this is a prime example as to why I will never get my morality from religion (as if every single reacttard on this site wasn't example enough). Where do I start? Authoritarian religious conservatism and manosphere? Yeah, along with you supporting corrupt politicians while being supposedly "anti-corruption". Pretty bad.


 * [[File:Firebender12345ism.png]] Firebender12345 ([[File:Monarch.png]]/[[File:3P.png]]) - 💀


 * [[File:ImmorThought.png]] TheImmorxy ([[File:Statesoc.png]]/[[File:Hoxha.png]]) - Just your averagely unremarkable Totalitarian Marxist-Leninist. Basically, nothing good.


 * [[File:Mikolayism_Pixel2.png]] MedicsChaotics ([[File:ModStrasser.png]]/[[File:Consocf.png]]) - Claims not to be anti-semitic, yet uses anti-semitic dogwhistles? Also, what is the hell is "moderate strasserism"? Any way, your authoritarianism and unironic liking of otto strasser are just massive nopes.


 * [[File:PATS.png]] ChineseSocialist ([[File:ML.png]]/[[File:Natcom.png]]/[[File:Consocf.png]]/[[File:Totalitarian.png]]) - 💀


 * [[File:LeninisBasedsmall.png]] Leninisbased556 ([[File:ML.png]]/[[File:Authprog.png]]/[[File:Totalitarian.png]]) -💀


 * [[File:Dengf.png]] 国际联盟球 ([[File:CronCapMask.png]]/[[File:Wumao.png]]/[[File:XiJinpingThoughtf.png]]) - Bruh, China is a totalitarian one party dictatorship with no respect for human rights. To side with all countries in the world, you choose the Chinese government?
 * [[File:RonziCom.png]] Ronzipot ([[File:Statesoc.png]]/[[File:Christcom.png]]) - Bruh this dude literally went from a classical liberal to an Marxist-Leninist in like a month, and he calls us larpers. Lol.
 * [[File:Technototball.png]] BERNHE0504 ([[File:NeoFash.png]]/[[File:Ultranat.png]]) - Now, you are, in every way, my political opposite. Not too different from all the fascist bs stuff I've seen.
 * [[File:ComradeKretk.png]] ComradeKretk ([[File:Ultraprogressivism.png]]/[[File:Stalin.png]]/[[File:Totalitarian.png]]) - 💀
 * [[File:Libratard.png]] NotLibra ([[File:MLM-Alt.png]]/[[File:Nativecom.png]]/[[File:WokeCommiesucc.png]]/[[File:Totalitarian.png]]) - 💀
 * [[File:SmartSimulatorIcon.png]] Smart Simulator ([[File:Authcon.png]]/[[File:Right-AnEn-alt.png]]/[[File:Natcap.png]]) - I'm sorry but, your ideology is retarded and flat out everything I'm opposed too.

*Dies of cringe*

 * [[File:FabiusBigGayHat.png]] PaleoFabius ([[File:Altrightfemboyicon.png]]/[[File:Jnaz.png]]/[[File:Strans.png]]/[[File:Hfash.png]]) - Y'know man, looking back on everything, it was hilarious ngl. I would want to do it all over again. Please come back here I miss you. And, if you're happening to reading this, please reach out to me I would really like to talk to you k thanks babe xoxo.
 * [[File:Mysticism.png]] Mysticism ([[File:EsoPinkCap.png]]/[[File:Jnaz.png]]/[[File:Strans.png]]/[[File:Hfash.png]]) - Hilarious, nothing more or less.

Quadrant Relations =
 * [[File:Yugotard.png]] YugoslavPartisan2 ([[File:SJW.png]]/[[File:WokeCommiesucc.png]]/[[File:Altleft.png]]/[[File:Antifa.png]]) - Stalinoid who is the most typical SJW moron on this entire site. I once acted similarly to you, but I've changed my behavior since then because I know it's not worth getting into any worthless online drama, I recommend you do the same.

Based

 * [[File:Centrist-yellow.png]] Centrism - Nice, and moderate, like all should be. Extremism is cringe. And, centrist economics are just in-general pretty based.
 * [[File:Libunity-yellow.png]] Libertarian Unity - You have the entirely right idea when it comes to individual freedom. But, you're too anti-statist. The state is still needed for harm prevention, otherwise, very based.
 * [[File:Libleft.png]] Libertarian Left - This goes so hard, but I seriously hate it when this quadrant is associated with woke baizuos and other people like that. Remove all of those people from this quadrant, and you'd be truly based.
 * [[File:Authleft.png]] Authoritarian Left - I'm not too fond of authoritarianism, but a lot of leaders here were progressive for their times, and authoritarianism is sometimes needed, so here you go. And, a part of me is considering center-statism, so if that ever comes, I would technically be located here so.
 * [[File:Leftunity.png]] Leftist Unity - I'm against socialism, but there are some left-capitalist ideologies here, like left-social democracy which is what I am, which makes this quadrant tolerable for me.

Neutral

 * [[File:Libright-yellow.png]] Libertarian Right - Right unity, but with some better characteristics. With supporting civil liberties, opposing interventionism, and paternalism, which is nice. But, still suffers from much of the same issues as right unity, with the addition that many adherents to this are socially conservative. But, it's not conservative, then it's remotely tolerable.

Cringe

 * [[File:Authunity.png]] Authoritarian Unity - Some of your leaders have been good, but a lot of unironic neo-nazis and other reactionary thinkers lie within this quadrant as well.
 * [[File:Rightunity-yellow.png]] Rightist Unity - Globalist, free-market capitalism, interventionism. YOU SHOULD KILL YOURSELF, NOW!!!!!!!!!!

Bruh
People's Relations =
 * [[File:Authright.png]] Authoritarian Right - Social collectivism and economic individualism, god, this makes me want to puke... Not even the third-way neoliberals who are socially liberal make this quadrant any better.

Positive

 * [[File:Sanders.png]] Bernie Sanders (95/100) - Bernie Sanders, my beloved Vermont senator <3


 * [[File:SwedenSocDem.png]] Olof Palme (93/100) - What else is there to say about you as a politican other than based and redpilled? You were one of the best presidents Sweden ever had, and calling out American imperialism were it was due was also good as well.


 * [[File:Insarch.png]] Nicholas John Roske - Fuck the Feds for what they did to you. Rest in power, hero. T~T


 * [[File:Shoecialism.png]] Shoe0nHead (90/100) - You were one of my first inspirations and introductions to politics. Although your earlier days were quite cringe. You've earned a special spot for one of the first political commentators I watched.


 * [[File:Mill.png]] John Stuart Mill (91/100) - The harm principle is based. Do what you want to do as long as you're not harming others is how society should be run.


 * [[File:Socdem.png]] Roman Albertovich Abalin (95/100) - Based and redpilled socdem from Russia, we agree on basically everything politically. Shame you had to leave your country due to the borderline fascist dictatorship that is the Putin regime. You've had such an influence on me as well about how I view authoritarian regimes as well, and how shitty and oppressive they are to live in. Russia would be a better place with more people like you living there.


 * [[File:JoshuaWong.png]] Joshua Wong (83/100) - Ehh,,, Don't get me wrong, I am 100% against the CCP and them destroying Hong Kong democracy, but you have said some really stupid stuff, like glorifying British imperialism just because "Chinese Imperialism is worse!". Like, cmon now, tjhat's an embarassing take.


 * [[File:RussiaOfTheFuture.png]] Alexei Navalny (82/100) - You expose the corruption of the United Russia Party and are way better alternative to the current Russian government. But, your borderline ethnic nationalism when it comes to Ukraine and other matters are cringe, you're nearly a perfect replacement for Putin, just drop all of this other stuff please.


 * [[File:Lincolnism.png]] Abraham Lincoln (83/100) - Ended slavery, shame you got assassinated.


 * [[File:Classlib.png]] John Locke (85/100) - While I am not a big fan of your economic model, you were quite based for your time, and so was the enlightenment. The way you fought against reactionary retards and monarchists was certified based.


 * [[File:Socdem.png]] Leung Kwok-hung (93/100) - One of the founders of the social democratic pro-democracy camp in hong kong. Fuck Chinese authorities for what they've done to you, you're a hero to Hong Kong. Rest in power, hero.


 * [[File:FDRismF.png]] Franklin D. Roosevelt (90/100) - Gigachad in a lot of ways, fought against the Nazis and Japanese Imperalists, shame you had to put the Japanese in internment camps, and while they weren't on the same level as the holocaust, still sucks you had to do that.


 * [[File:Dubcekism.png]] Alexander Dubcek (86/100) - Imagine if your government hadn't be crushed by the Soviets. You were one of the more based people in the soviet bloc, and would've left your country off far better than in the hands of the USSR.


 * [[File:NatProg.png]] Theodore Roosevelt (80/100) - Easily the best president we've ever had, up there with FDR. Although your Imperialism was pretty bad.


 * [[File:Keynes.png]] John Maynard Keynes (95/100) - The man who invented the best economic model, stay mad lolberts.


 * [[File:Gore.png]] Al Gore (88/100) - Based environmentalism, you would've been a lot better in many ways to George Bush.


 * [[File:MLK_Jr.png]] Martin Luther King Jr (94/100) - One of the best civil rights leaders in the 20th century, shame you got assassinated.


 * [[File:Gorb.png]] Mikhail Gorbachev (84/100) - Democratized the USSR, ended censorship, and his other reforms were based. Shame they didn't have the effect you wanted, which caused your country to collapse. You had the right idea, and Russia would be a lot better if you were instated into power and not Putin.


 * [[File:Kemal.png]] Mustafa Kemal Ataturk (88/100) - One of the least bad dictators, getting rid of the theocratic Islamic crap was based. Shame all your work of westernizing your country is being undone.

Neutral/Mixed

 * [[File:Obamium.png]] Barrack Obama (57/100) - You were ultimately unremarkable in your presidency, typical centrist democrat.


 * [[File:Corbynism-ball.png]] Jeremy Corbyn (42/100) - Eh, I used to look up to you somewhat, even if I would've never voted for you if I had lived in the UK. But, looking into you further, you do have some legitimately questionable takes and other things that make me lower my opinion on you greatly that I am not unable to look past, still better than the neolibs in labour party.


 * [[File:Bidenism.png]] Joe Biden (55/100) - Meh, you've done some good. But, still the compromise and not what we need.


 * [[File:Long.png]] Huey Long (42/100) - While you did a lot of good for the state of Louisiana, the way you did it was bad! While you may be one of the only good authoritarians, someone could easily come on in and undue all your work and do worse and there would be nobody to stop them.


 * [[File:Tito.png]] Josip Broz Tito (45/100) - Most practical socialist, although authoritarianism is cringe. Atleast you threw fascists into pits and returned them to where they should go, which is undoubtedly based.


 * [[File:Cball-Ukraine.png]] Volodymyr Zelenskyy (42/100) - Look, while I do support your right to self-determination, you're really no different from any other oligarch in post-soviet states.


 * [[File:Cball-British_India.png]] George Orwell (44/100) - Being against authoritarianism is based, but your homophobia, conservatism, and general prejudice are cringe.

Negative

 * [[File:RepubUS.png]] Mike Parson (15/100) - A complete joke of a state Governor, kleptocratic and incompetent idiot. Very typical, did nothing for covid, heighted tensions between protesting groups, blocking voting reform. God, I hate you so fucking much.


 * [[File:RepubUS.png]] Greg Abott (13/100) - If only the incident that left you paralyzed from the waist down left resulted in death, fuck you.


 * [[File:Merkelism.png]] Angela Merkel (21/100) - Typical neoliberal. I don't really have to explain why I dislike her.


 * [[File:Trumpism.png]] Donald Trump (21/100) - You were one of the worst presidents America had in the 21st century. Your tax cuts did not help anyone but the rich, your attacks on American democracy and your authoritarianism, careless protectionist policies, climate denialism. Realistically, should've been impeached. How you haven't been disowned by the GOP establishment astounds me.


 * [[File:AOC.png]] Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (23/100) - You're basically everything that is wrong with the democratic establishment.


 * [[File:Statlib.png]] Justin Trudeau (23/100) - Neoliberal imperialist and a fake progressive. There is very little good I can actually say about you.


 * [[File:Vaushism.png]] Vaush (21/100) - Annoying debate bro. I looked into the whole "justifying CP" stuff and it seems more far fetched now with more context given, but I'm just unsure about that. With this, you're still an annoying and contrarian youtuber. Atleast you support NATO, out of all things, so called "leftist" lmao.


 * [[File:Chavismo.png]] Hugo Chavez (14/100) - Why does anyone look up to this guy as an "anti-imperialist" baston? He was a horrible leader, the socdems that oppose your government would be better.


 * [[File:Reagan.png]] Ronald Reagan (12/100) - Overall, one of the worst presidents America ever had to endure, tricke-down economics are a scam that only made the rich richer and the poor poorer, funded terrorists, and your presidency still has a profound effect on America today. (you're also in hell waiting for heaven to trickle onto you)


 * [[File:Thatcher.png]] Margaret Thatcher (12/100) - Ding dong, the wicked bitch is dead.


 * [[File:Shapirocube.png]] Ben Shapiro (13/100) - Look up what this dude has said about Hispanic people, and you can probably get a good idea as to why I don't look him, disregarding his politics, which I am also fundamentally in disagreement with.


 * [[File:Christianright.png]] Steven Crowder (13/100) - Overall, a massive pussy.


 * [[File:MagicPT.png]] Henry Kissinger (11/100) - Pretty much a terrorist. I really hope you get what's coming to you one day.


 * [[File:Chilib.png]] Milton Friedman (14/100) - Lolbert. Go learn some basic economics.


 * [[File:RonPaul.png]] Ron Paul (14/100) - Everything I despise neatly rapt up into one little package!


 * [[File:BoJo.png]] Boris Johnson (12/100) - Not only was brexit very cringe, your leadership in general is just terrible.


 * [[File:FIDESZ.png]] Viktor Orbán (11/100) - Very cringe Russian asset who is destroying his own country.
 * [[File:Mesocon.png]] Dennis Prager (12/100) - Founder of PragerU, enough said.


 * [[File:GWB.png]] George W. Bush (11/100) - War mongering imperialist and war criminal.


 * [[File:PiS.png]] Andrzej Duda (14/100) - Your party is a laughing stock. From its corruption, authoritarianism, nothing good I can say about it.


 * [[File:Plutocrat.png]] Elon Musk (11/100) - You should be thrown in jail, and your monopoly broken up.


 * [[File:Plutocrat.png]] Jeff Bezos (11/100) - Amazon should be broken up.


 * [[File:Plutocrat.png]] Mark Zuckerberg (11/100) - We all know you're a lizard. Also fuck facebook and the metaverse.


 * [[File:Hitler.png]] Basically, anything related to the Nazis or other Fascist groups (-infinite/100) - The amount of suffering you've inflicted onto the world will never be forgotten. Never again.


 * [[File:Polpot.png]] Pol Pot (-infinite/100) - You left Cambodia in ruins and were a genocidal maniac.


 * [[File:Baath.png]] Bashar Al Assad (6/100) - Genocidal and incompetent. Although God, Syria, and Bashar is an absolute bop, why do authoritarian regimes always make the best songs?


 * [[File:Putin.png]] Vladimir Putin (6/100) - The day your evil empire gets overthrown is the day that the world can see peace.


 * [[File:Lukash.png]] Alexander Lukashenko (6/100) - Anti-semitic and homophobic kleptocractic despot, I fully back the protests against the Byelorussia government. Hopefully one day your reign comes to an end and the Byelorussian people do not have to live under your tyranny.


 * [[File:Dengf.png]] Deng Xiaoping (8/100) - Your reforms may have helped and were necessary for China, but you still quite evil. Not AS bad as your predecessors, but still awful. Not to mention, what you did to things like welfare programs, the protesters, ect.


 * [[File:XiJinpingThoughtf.png]] Xi Jinping (-100/100) - You've in a lot of ways ruined China and set it on a course for failure undoing Deng's reforms and strengthening the totalitarian state of China. Just to think there was some chance China could see a better future. Fuck you! Anyone who supports or defends you are not leftists.


 * [[File:Mao.png]] Mao Zedong (-infinite/100) - You may have brought china out of the feudal system and gave women rights, but you were a totalitarian genocidal maniac who starved millions upon millions of his own people.


 * [[File:Stalin.png]] Joseph Stalin (-infinite/100) - You killed millions of your own people for quite literally no reason. Like, the worst of the worst.


 * [[File:Pinochet-hat.png]] Augusto Pinochet (0/100) - Many of Chile's modern problems can be attributed to you.


 * [[File:CountEn.png]] Oswald Spengler (0/100) - Your works are retarded, and your modern followers like jerking off to drawn images of children.


 * [[File:Hoppef.png]] Hans-Hermann Hoppe (0/100) - As if the retarded ancap larping wasn't enough, this "physical removal" stuff is just on another level of stupid.


 * [[File:Obj.png]] Ayn Rand (0/100) - Worst thing Stalin did was let this bitch out of the USSR alive. Objectivism, more like, objectively shit.

Political/Compass Unity
Matt in-general is a centrist in this regard, and is willing to work with both moderate leftists and rightists (so long as they're progressive) to achieve political goals. However, he's more willing to work with libertarians than he is with authoritarians, so he would favor libertarian unity over authoritarian unity most of the time. While he isn't against the idea of united fronts against ideologies like fascism, those united fronts shouldn't tolerate undemocratic ideologies. So, if there is to be a united front, this front should be made up of only democratic ideologies, and should be as peaceful as possible. He's willing to work with leftists who reject central planning as their means of production, as centrally planned socialism is bad and ineffective at addressing the needs of the people. So, as long as they are pro-market, and are moderate, he is willing to work with them. Like democratic socialists. With all of this, they have to be socially progressive as well, but not subscribe to the whole elitist intersectional identity politic culture war BS, and should focus on class issues. Largely depends, he will work together with libertarians who are centrists economically the most, but is more apprehensive with working along side people who are economically right-wing. But, so long as they are socially progressive, democratic, and economically moderate, to him, they are allies in the fight for freedom. He generally doesn't get a long with most authoritarians due to his stances on authority, So, there will be little to if any co-operation with authoritarians. Authoritarians who are center are ok given they are progressive, but authoritarians who are anti-democratic are not, and will be flat out refused to co-operate with regardless of what their social stances are. As, being democratic is one of the necessary ideological components for political co-operation. Depends on what type of rightist they are, if they're a neoliberal, then no. They also have to be socially progressive and economically moderate as well, otherwise, in most instances, you will see no co-operation with people on this side of the compass
 * -|Left Unity=
 * -|Libertarian Unity=
 * -|Authoritarian Unity=
 * -|Right Unity=

Navboxes
Regular Navboxes =

Community Navboxes =

Q&A
Q what do you think of the cultural views of hardline mls you mentioned earlier
 * - Feel free to ask me anything within this section. If you want to view old comments, go here.
 * Q UserWiki:DragonRed - Why did you become pan nationalist when you were a anti -nationalist?
 * A - Well I became more nationalist because of my stances on immigration so i figured an ideology that supports both nationalism and internationalism would only make sense to adopt since I never stopped being the former.
 * Q UserWiki:Ninjack-Aus - If all western liberal democracies (IE, NATO/EU) where to collapse, what non-atlanticist ideology would you least dislike to take it's place?
 * A - Well preferably ideologies that allow free and fair elections, anything that isn't utopic that allows for such would be fine by me (mostly). I can't really say, but that's the best answer I can give.
 * Q [[File:Panth.png]] - What are your thoughts on Yan Xishan thought?
 * A - It's conservative and authoritarian, so I don't like it.
 * Q - What's your opinion on the President of Palau, Surangel Whipps Jr?
 * A - i know nothing about the politics of Palau, so idk.

Comments

 * - If you want to make any comments, make them here.


 * Baconsalad - i have no idea why you have such a long pcb page and no i did not read it all. Add me (or update it).


 * - add me
 * - Ok!
 * - Hey, Matteel. Don’t forget to add me when you get the chance!
 * - That's already been done.


 * - Add me here (for the lulz, please and thank you).
 * - ok
 * - Why did you give Gorbachev such a high mark? His ideologies were based, but he was incompetent as hell and didn't do anything to stop kleptocrats like Yeltsin. He was part of why Russia and post-Soviet states are in their current state.
 * - Well i rank him that high because I like him as a figure, sure he didn't do a whole lot to stop that, but I still like the reforms he did make during the time period, even if did cause the eventual decline of the USSR. But you're right, I lowered his ranking I gave him slightly just to take in factor all of that.
 * [[File:Panth.png]] - Who do you simp for?
 * - Well I said I liked progressive democrats, so take anyone there that is anything center of left (although nothing past that) and I probably have a good opinion of them.


 * - Hey man, I have adjusted my review for your page.
 * - Thanks ^.^

Userwiki:Marsvner - dude can you add me in discord? My discord name is marsvner#2980.
 * happy forth of july Westoid ☠️2🇺🇸
 * - Cope commie.
 * My best friend on this site
 * - What do you mean?
 * - I changed many things, update relations on me
 * - Sure thing.
 * - Yo there, add me?
 * - Almost done finishing up my page, give me tomorrow from the point I sent this message


 * [[File:MrsVzrFlag.png]] Marsis [[File:MrsVzr2.png]] - I added you, feel free to add me as well
 * - You will be added to me page
 * - Hi matteel, I'm once again asking your opinion on LiangGuoxiong,he claims to be a trotskyist but keeps flirting in Hongkong LSD,also imma eager to see your opinion of trotskyists inside socdem UK Labour Party.
 * - I don't know who that is unfortunately.
 * - Pls update thnx
 * - Alright, will do.
 * - Ok but this doesn't change the indisputable fact that laissez-faire capitalism is a failure and that free-markets are also a failure and that libertarianism failed us and that neoliberalism is almost as dumb as libertarianism and that John Locke and Adam Smith both oppose libertarianism and that both of them wanted regulation or a government and that John Locke supported taxes and that minarchists and "anarcho-capitalists" which aren't even real anarchists are neo-feudalists who want massive wealth inequality and a class system between the bourgeoisie and the proletariat and that under free-markets more than 40% of food is wasted and thrown in the dumps when they could be used feeding people and that classical liberalism failed 7 times in the span of 50 years and that employers treat their employees badly to maximize profit and that the CEO of a billion-dollar corporation will spend millions to bust unions when they could just let the employees build a union so the employees get represented but they don't because they are greedy and would prefer the extra millions of dollars more than their employees being treated well and that the NAP is stupid and flawed and that libertarians worship the NAP like it's a god and that capitalism makes people greedy and that capitalism needs reform and regulation in order to be successful and that libertarianism and classical liberalism will just lead to crony capitalism with an oligarchy of a few extremely wealthy billionaires while there are people barely getting by and that currently the 3,000 richest people in the world have more wealth than the rest of the world combined and if that doesn't prove that the system is messed up then that proves that you support people working terrible wages to barely get by and that unions are the best counter to tyrannical employers and that the minimum wage should be increased so the employees make more money and that child labor is immoral and that people in third-world countries shouldn't be getting paid such bad wages and that anarcho-capitalism is an oxymoron because there is a class system between the bourgeoisie and the proletariat while anarchy seeks to remove all hierarchy and that anarcho-capitalism should be just renamed to "fascist-capitalism" because it allows the people with a lot of money to control our lives in every way possible however they want and the government isn't there to protect us. (2 extra notes: I didn't make most of the copypasta but I agree with most of it).
 * - I don't know were this came from, but I agree.
 * [[File:MLL.png]] CynicalLibra - Update relations please.


 * Mind updating relations? I did drop the isolationism (but still oppose NATO and military alliances in general, but am open to regional unions provided they fit certain criteria) and I’m more of a progcon rather than a conservative (as it was done during my last days of said conservative stage). Likewise I don’t really take “lesser evils” anymore when it comes to geopolitics (ex: both NATO and Russia/China are bad and that’s what matters, the War in Ukraine is still a capitalist war in the end, despite Ukraine being slightly better as they’re the defender) -
 * - Sure thing. And honestly, I think I was getting a bit too caught up larping as a neocon because it literally made me consider the atlanticist position I hold, I'm probably going to change that position as I just don't agree with the idea that any country deserves its hegemony, not saying I won't stop supporting the West, just that Atlanticism makes it sound like I unconditionally support the west when that's actually not the case. I just hold no sympathies towards authoritarian states.


 * - Steven Crowder is not only a conservative bigot that attacks transgender people for no reason and says racist things, but he also said that people with OCD are pedophiles and deserve to die.
 * - Oh I know.
 * - That's why I consider him to be a neo-fascist rather than a conservative.
 * [[File:Glencoe.png]] Glencoe13- Damn wouldn't be surprised

Glencoe13- hey tony here add me plz link to ideology: https://polcompballanarchy.miraheze.org/wiki/Glencoeism
 * - Ok.
 * - Hello Matteel, care to update relations? I no longer consider myself truly conservative socialist anymore nor would I necessarily describe myself as "conservative in the first world" any longer.
 * - Sure thing.
 * [[File:Scripper.png]] Scripper - Add me.
 * - Will do.
 * [[File:Ethplur.png]] [[File:Esofash.png]] [[File:Crusadism.png]] NewCato: Mate, you trying to be unique? You're kind of basic to be honest. Though most the things you say are quite garbage. Also your opinion is invalid since you are a globetard.
 * - dc + didn't ask + ratio and ur gay.
 * [[File:Glencoe.png]] Glencoe - damn fabuis is that you?
 * - When was there any indication this was Fabius?
 * **[[File:Glencoe.png]] Glencoe - he called you fake American at first,Changed Fabius quickly BREHNES page and BREHNES said fabuis was coming back.
 * [[File:Esofash.png]] NewCato:Bringing back the black and tans?
 * [[File:Rebel_Alliance.png]] CarbynSobek - Add me?

CynicalLibra - How am I a Pinksoc lmao? My point was that you said western chauvinism is baziou phrase, when baizou was invented to describe western chauvinistic liberals.
 * - "I should be the controller of my own body and life choices from all governing authorities, but disregarding morality entirely is cringe for me." - So you admit that morality should "control" you, it should be your governing authority. Stirner is not immoral, nor does he remove evaulative language. The role of morality, especially as a universal system places the individual under it, so if you truly valued yourself above anything, it would also include morality. But this does not mean you cannot value others, or their wellbeing. But if it comes down to it, are you going to limit yourself for another side of yourself, i.e. sacrifice yourself because you could not live without the other, or are you going to sacrifice yourself because your life and personal value was already forfeit and under the heel of "the right thing to do"?
 * What's your current opinion on the American school system right now? Like what they teach, are they time efficient, do they need to get reformed, do you believe in all those memes Etc.
 * [[File:brainrust.png]] BrainRust123 - Add? [[File:TheElectricBomb.png]] TEB - I uopdated relations with you, so do the same. (Also, From what I know, Post-modernism isn't basically "fuck society", it goes like "everything has it's own definition so grand narratives are bullshit", from what I know)
 * - Alright, will do. And Ik that's not what post-modernism is, when i was writing that I was thinking of something else which caused me to write what I wrote which I realize is retarded and a misrepresentation of what post-modernism is.
 * [[File:Syntridem3.png]] Apple - Your ideology is becoming really based. Are you still a supporter of NATO?
 * - Not anymore, after a couple of conversations and some research, i came to the conclusion that NATO as an neoliberal neo-imperialist organization, for a couple reasons I stated on my page. Although, not against the idea of a pan-national alliance ofc.
 * - you support woke ideas, which is why I labeled you as such.
 * [[File:MLL.png]] - Define woke. Also, how exactly am I woke besides being culturally left?
 * [[File:ComradeKretk.png]] ComradeKretk - Supporting lgbtq rights and abortion is woke? Wot? You look at things too western supremacist.
 * [[File:Syntridem3.png]] Apple - The use of Baizuo phases like “western chauvinism”, for example, is woke, and yes, I agree with him. So are supporting idpol and ethnic self-hatred. You know Matteel supports LGBT and abortion too, but he completely dropped wokeism and SJW hatred towards people who disagree with his progressive ideals, which makes him no longer woke.
 * [[File:ComradeKretk.png]] - Baizuo was invented to describe western chauvinists
 * [[File:Syntridem3.png]] Apple - Matteel is no longer a western chauvinist and Baizuo anymore. Plus, Baizuo could be used to describe anyone who supports idpol.
 * [[File:Syntridem3.png]] Apple - Matteel, why do you think I oppose populism? There is no evidence of that whatsoever.
 * - I'll change that description then.
 * - Update relations, please. I had an ideological shift
 * - Alright.
 * Apple - Nekoqing is no longer a Consoc, he is now more of a progcon and culturally centrist, same for me.

I am not a genocide denier. You always get it wrong. Where did you get that from? There are so many lies about China and Russia. I laugh even when I read it in foreign press. What did your America do? It bombed Yugoslavia. Confused Ukraine. He invaded Libya, Syria, Iraq. It bombed Vietnam and Cambodia. The Soviets, so that Japan would not enter; dropped the atomic bomb. divided Korea Also, the Soviets are a thousand and eleven times better than the American. China is not like the American at least. So is Russia. I see them as more poised. I'm not in nazbol. I am not a degenerate hedonistic libtard western chauvinist like you. Your leftism only serves hedonism, and your foreign policy serves imperialism.
 * - Yes you are, multiple people have called you out for denying genocide. I'm not gonna point it out because it isn't hard to find, and what you just mentioned about American imperialism is irrelevant to me because I was never denying that, but the next statements you make are purely your opinion. Nothing screams "western chauvinist" more than "both NATO and the EU are both neoliberal empires that exploit developing countries for their own gain", also if "degenerate" means I get to have fun in the ways I so choose, then that is ultimately irrelevant to me because I don't care.

I said this ironically. I mean satire. You always approach the subject with a western centered approach. You believe blindly without questioning anything. You would believe it if Russia dropped an atomic bomb on Ukraine. You believe that North Korea is executing people for not getting their hair cut properly. You believe that Assad is killing civilians. Do not approach with prejudice without listening without understanding. Third world countries are just ahh so authoritarian you'd come across. Yes, there are authoritarian leaders who are advanced and abolish their country. Like Ataturk Gaddafi Tito. I do not like authority. It is necessary to use authority for the progress of people and societies. We; We walked not on flowery paths, but on thorny paths. It is imperative that we be cautious. Sometimes it takes hard work to progress. Your foreign policy is strictly imperialist; nothing has changed. Also why are you islamophobic? Are there any Muslims in America? You're experiencing straw man centoromy. You're making a compromise just because a little comfort will be lost. Why don't you criticize the American presidential system? If you're a democrat, why don't we criticize European royalty? There is no democracy in America. Presidential system is not democracy.

Representative democracy should be abolished; must be transferred to liquid democracy. Monarchism must be abolished; should be made a republic. Capitalism must abolished should be made a Socialism. Theocracy must abolished ;should be made a Secularism. Religious institutions should expropriate their properties. Evolutionary materialism should be taught in all schools. It should be taught that there are actually two sexes and homosexuals will be normal individuals. For the solution of women's problems; Feminist society must be created. In order to realize the economic and social rights of women, the "Women's Solidarity Organization", which was established under the Central Committee and consists of women, should be established.


 * [[File:Gabovaur.png]] - Your opinions on Black markets, Stealing goods and scamming losers and Organized Criminality?

I am not a holocaust denier. How many times will I say it. Don't you understand me? I support it because Russia and China are pissing off your hedonistic libtards. I am not really a supporter of Russia and China. Repeat comment I'm still leftist. I do not support reactionary regimes. Neither are China and Russia social reactionary regimes. If there is a monarchy or theocracy, it is reactionary. None of these exist. real social reactionary; European monarchist countries.

Please fill in who i remind you off in my page-Comrade Kretk

- Can you re-add me :)