UserWiki:Matteel

Hello, and welcome to my page! My ideology is, the self-insert of the user  Matteel. Mattism is civically liberal,  democratic,  culturally reformist, economically  center-left, militarily  non-Interventionist,  patriotic,  left-populist, and diplomatically  globalist.

[[File:Consti.png]] Introduction [[File:Consti.png]]
Matteel has been a lurker on the subreddit ever since 2021 and a user of this wiki since the old one got shut down (I hadn't made an account at the time), and around summer started being active on it. I've contributed to both r/polcompball and to r/polcompballanarchy and I'm flaired as Social Democracy on the offical subreddit.

Governmental Views

 * [[File:Liberal_Democracy.png]] Liberal Democracy


 * [[File:Fed.png]] Federalism


 * [[File:Semidirect.png]] Semi-Direct Democracy


 * [[File:Semiprez.png]] Semi-Presidential System


 * [[File:DefDem.png]] Defensive Democracy


 * [[File:Reform.png]] Reformism (In democracies)


 * [[File:Revolution.png]] Revolution (In autocracies)


 * [[File:Consti.png]] Constitutionalism


 * [[File:Republicanismpix.png]] Republicanism


 * [[File:Secular.png]] Secularism


 * [[File:Lpop.png]] Left-Wing Populism


 * [[File:Civilib.png]] Civic Liberalism

Economic Views

 * [[File:Neocorporatism.png]] Neo-Corporatism
 * [[File:Dirigisme.png]] Dirigisme
 * [[File:Cooperative Socialism.png]] Encouraged Cooperative Economy
 * [[File:Regulationism.png]] Economic Regulationism
 * [[File:Welf.png]] Welfare Statism
 * [[File:Keynes.png]] Mixed Market Economy
 * [[File:EconProg.png]] Economic Progressivism
 * [[File:Socgeo.png]] Welfare Georgism

Foreign Views

 * [[File:Globnat.png]] Alter-Globalism
 * [[File:Cosmo.png]] Cosmopolitanism
 * [[File:Ecoglob.png]] Environmental Globalization
 * [[File:Postconan.png]] Anti-Colonialism
 * [[File:Pac.png]] Non-Interventionism
 * [[File:Protect.png]] Fair-Trade Protectionism
 * [[File:Leftnat.png]] Left-Wing Nationalism
 * [[File:Cball-Taiwan.png]] Pro-ROC
 * [[File:Native.png]] Indigenous Rights
 * [[File:Cball-Ukraine.png]] Pro-Ukraine
 * [[File:Cball-Albania.png]] Albanian Reunification
 * [[File:Demcon.png]] Pro-Kurdish Independence
 * [[File:AntiBaath.png]] Anti-Assad
 * [[File:Zio.png]] Two State Solution [[File:Cball-Palestine.png]]
 * [[File:Euroscept.png]] Left-Wing Euroskepticism
 * [[File:Necon.png]] Pro-NATO Membership
 * [[File:Intercult.png]] Interculturalism (In terms of Immigration)
 * [[File:Pan-Nationalism.png]] Pan-Nationalism

Cultural Views

 * [[File:SocialProgressive.png]] Social Progressivism


 * [[File:Civnat.png]] Civic Nationalism


 * [[File:Civlibert.png]] Civil Libertarianism


 * [[File:Gay.png]] Pro-LGBTQ+


 * [[File:FreeSpeak.png]] Freedom of Speech


 * [[File:Indiv.png]] Individualism


 * [[File:DvPermission.png]] Permissive Society


 * [[File:ProDrug.png]] Drug Legalization/Decriminalization


 * [[File:Utility.png]] Rule Utilitarianism


 * [[File:Humanismpix.png]] Humanism


 * [[File:Fem.png]] Feminism


 * [[File:Menslibnoears.png]] Men's Liberation


 * [[File:Pro-ChoiceRemade.png]] Pro-Choice


 * [[File:MLK_Jr.png]] Racial Egalitarianism


 * [[File:CapAnti_Clerical.png]] Anti-Clericalism


 * [[File:Polycult.png]] Polyculturalism

Philosophical Views

 * [[File:Moral.png]] Moralism
 * [[File:Consequentialism.png]] Consequentialism
 * [[File:Utility.png]] Utilitarianism
 * [[File:Humanismpix.png]] Humanism
 * [[File:Indiv.png]] Individualism
 * [[File:Pragmat.png]] Pragmaticism
 * [[File:MoralUni.png]] Moral Universalism
 * [[File:Cosmo.png]] Cosmopolitanism
 * [[File:Hedonism-cloud.png]] Hedonism
 * [[File:Envi.png]] Naturalism
 * [[File:AntiSupernationalism.png]] Anti-Religion
 * [[File:Constructivist.png]] Constructivism
 * [[File:Pop.png]] Populism
 * [[File:Antinil.png]] Anti-Nihilism

[[File:Anin.png]] Overall [[File:Anin.png]]
My entire philosophy maximizes my own personal lifestyle liberty from all forms of authority, and is built of off philosophical hedonism, materialism, and individualism. With the core justification being ethical utilitarianism. I reject government authority, community authority, and religious authority. If it's a form of authority that puts itself above me, then I outright reject it without much thought. I want to be in full control of myself when I can, I only live for myself. And, while my ideology is individualistic, I disavow mass individualism as well, as some authority is needed for harm prevention for things like pandemic outbreaks and whatnot, along with needing the government to be centralized enough to provide people services and ect. But my overall attitude is a "live and let live". So, it's naturally progressive due to this, as progressives are tolerant of what others do and alternate lifestyles, I'm a progressive on social issues, as conservatives think they can tell you what to do with your body and exercise authority over you. However, I realize progressivism has elements in it that are inherently anti-individualist as well, like with the modern day progressive focus on things like identity politics and political correctness, I reject parts of progressivism, but that doesn't make me socially conservative, it just means I'm upholding my individualist stances, and they happen to align more with social progressivism than they do with social conservatism. I've always have been a naturally individualistic person do to what I will mention below in these bits, and I don't want to be told what to do unless it's something that I absolutely have to do for the benefit of everyone else. However, I am personally conflicted with this ideology, as well it still works, I've been considering more romanticist and idealistic philosophies as well, as those can also go together with philosophical hedonism and individualism as well. But, I will ultimately need to read more on philosophy to decide that (My reasoning is that my ideas not being grounded in reality are more compatible with hedonism as a concept, but I would prefer my ideals to be more reality grounded.).

[[File:Envi.png]] Metaphysical Naturalism [[File:Envi.png]]
I am a philosophical naturalist, and while I believe the material world is the only world to exist, I also believe it's more accurate to measure what is in the material world than just claim that the material world is the only world to exist, as that is not measurable. I still know all forms of spiritually created by humans aren't real. So, this would follow metaphysical naturalism, as it's more logically coherent than metaphysical materialism is.

[[File:DeterminismIcon.png]] Metaphysical Determinism [[File:DeterminismIcon.png]]
I am a determinist, and believe that individuals do not have free will, as there is nothing that gives us individuals free will, all actions are inevitable consequence of antecedent states of affairs. This way of thinking would follow hard determinism. As in a world that is only material, this would be the logical conclusion to come to.

[[File:Moral.png]] Moralism [[File:Moral.png]]
Morality is important for society, as humans need to have a sense of what is right or wrong for society to function. There are things that humans know naturally, such as not causing harm to others, this is what has kept us as a species alive up until the present day. How morality should function will be mentioned below this bit.

[[File:Consequentialism.png]] Consequentialism [[File:Consequentialism.png]]
My morality comes from consequentialism, actions should be looked at through a lens of the consequences of one's actions. However, this is the baseline of my morality, as pure consequentialism in of itself is flawed, as the intent of one's actions should also be considered as well, actions should also consider what makes everyone as a group happy. So, my morality branches off from consequentialism at this point.

[[File:Utility.png]] Utilitarianism [[File:Utility.png]]
This is where my morality branches off from consequentialism, I believe that morality is dictated by what causes the most and least harm to individuals. The ethical theory of utilitarianism is a theory is a branch of consequentialism by John Stuart Mill, that states that actions should be judged based on how much good or harm an action causes. And as such, actions and policies should be looked and lens that to increase the happiness of individuals and decrease suffering. This can largely sum up my views on welfare and state regulation in the economy. As, I view welfare as necessary for the creation of a happy society free from inequality and poverty. If equality of opportunity can be achieved through this, then that creates a happier population overall, and economic statistics overall back this as a fact. This is were some of my collective takes come from. Things abortion and other services create happier societies overall, so from a utilitarian standpoint, I would be completely opposed to banning such services, and would be morally wrong to do so.

[[File:MoralUni.png]] Moral Universalism [[File:MoralUni.png]]
I'm a moral universalist, my moral universalism comes from my cosmopolitanism and utilitarianism. I believe these ethical theories could be applied globally to all humans regardless of their status. With this, I'm opposed to moral nihilism or moral relativism. Believing that, if something creates happiness, then it has moral worth. Something like human rights, for example, should be applied universally for all countries, as these rights are what grant others right to have a good life free from persecution. Progressive western values of egalitarianism and societal permissiveness are what the values of all countries should be globally. As. these values have created the happiest societies compared to those under authoritarian oppressive dictatorships.

[[File:Constructivist.png]] Social Constructivism [[File:Constructivist.png]]
Being a social constructivist, I believe societal factors and the upbringing of individuals are important in determining the behavior of said individuals, and that there are no traits to people that are "inherent". This reasoning should be used when observing the behavior and nature of society at large to address the needs of people in said society.

[[File:Technocracy.png]] Rationalism [[File:Technocracy.png]]
I believe it's important to rely on reason for actions we do as humans, and not forms of past authority. And, is essential to ethical decision making.

[[File:AntiSupernationalism.png]] Anti-Religion [[File:AntiSupernationalism.png]]
As stated on my metaphysics page, I am a philosophical naturalist. The closest thing I am to religiously is atheism. Neither hard or soft atheism. As, I know for absolute certainty that God and all forms of spiritually are not real. But, to make a claim that the material world is the only word to exist for parts of the universe we cannot observe is absurd. So, while materialism as a metaphysical concept can be used to accurately describe our observable universe, it cannot be used to describe the entire universe, as that is not observable. So, a more accurate way of looking at the universe would be through a naturalistic lens.

I myself am not religious for a couple of reasons. The first one being, my moral worth as a person is above all forms of authority, which includes spirituality, so I naturally put myself above it, as it doesn't make sense to gauge my morals off of it when it isn't real. Second being, I've never been religious to begin with, nor have I ever saw the appeal of religion, as I've never been able to conceptualize anything outside the material universe, I've been a materialist my entire life, and that isn't changing. The third one being, I don't like the idea of being told what to do, I like to have fun and do what makes me happy, and this has always been my natural train of thought due to my ADHD, which has always made me an impulsive person, so the idea of appealing to some imaginary spirits that do not exist is not appealing to me at all, and never has been for this reason. Fourth being, I've never liked or understood any of the ideas that religious doctrines advocate for, as I've always have seen these as being written by humans and nothing else, making everything in them written to how humans wanted to envision them, so religion from this perspective has never made any sense to me.

[[File:Cosmo.png]] Cosmopolitanism [[File:Cosmo.png]]
I view myself as a citizen of the world, and I get a lot of my international theory from cosmopolitanism, as I believe the world should be internationally united. I would combine cosmopolitan views with the global justice movement that seeks to combat the damage done by economic globalization while promoting international co-operation between countries. Anything that encourages international co-operation between countries is in-general good, and should be encouraged to promote peace between different countries, this form of globalization would follow the alter-globalist model of globalization. Along with having mutual respect for each other's differences were it's due, given, you're willing to provide the same respect as well.

[[File:Metamodernism.png]] Meta-Modernism [[File:Metamodernism.png]]
Modernism and Post-Modernism both make good points, but I can't fully subscribe to either of them. And, as such, I subscribe to the idea of Meta-Modernism. Believing that, the discoveries of both modernism and post-modernism are not ignorable, but the current post-modern attitude is not desirable. He holds that the narratives of modernism are social constructs in of themselves, but still believes that the values of said narratives hold value.

[[File:Humanismpix.png]] Humanism [[File:Humanismpix.png]]
My humanist ways of thinking can largely come from utilitarianism. That being, all people on this planet come from the same place, and are entitled to be treated with the same dignity and standards. There's a human identity that inherently surpasses all other identities, like nationality or race, It's important to uphold human dignity and standards for this reason.

[[File:Indiv.png]] Individualism [[File:Indiv.png]]
I am an individualist, and believe that individualism is important for society. Individuals should be free to desire their own passions and hobbies free from any sort of higher authority. Whether it be clerical authority, governmental authority, or community authority, the individual worth triumphs over all of that. With this, I support the expansion and preservation of civil liberties, like Freedom of Speech, as those civil liberties are important for any free society to thrive under. Some would argue that individualism and economic leftism are incompatible with each other, but I would argue that having the state provide you with everything would allow people to pursue their own interests and hobbies without the fear of poverty or unemployment and ect. So, individualism is more compatible with economic leftism than it is with economic rightism in my opinion.

This is also were my progressivism comes from, as ideologies like conservatism are very anti-individualist, conservatives believe they can tell you what you can do with your body, who you can marry, ect. With leftists having a more "live and let live" attitude, I will side with them, as they don't feel the need to boss me around and are the least opposed to me living my lifestyle as to how I want to not based on pointless dogmatic attitudes. I believes everyone regardless of their back rounds are equal and are deserving of the same civil rights and liberties. I'm also opposed to authoritarianism because in most of those authoritarian regimes throughout history I would've at best been socially excluded and lived a horrible life or killed in. So, I have no reason not to be an individualist by the very nature of my existence as a person. I know my rights aren't guaranteed in democratic societies, but I will take my chances in a democratic society over an authoritarian society any day of the week. I serve my own interests and my own interests alone above all authority unless I absolutely have to serve the interests of others. (Of fucking course I go outside and touch grass and have friends outside the internet you fucking dumbasses, but I'm not naturally inclined towards community things as I'm not a naturally sociable person, so I like to be with myself more often than I like to be with others)

However, with all of this in mind, one might ask why I'm not a libertarian (in a civic sense) who is opposed to governmental authority playing a role in the daily lives of citizens. This would mostly be because, I believe that for the trade off of individual liberty of people and for individual rights to be upheld, the government has to be there to protect said individual liberty whenever threats to individual liberty arise.

[[File:Mill.png]] Harm Principle [[File:Mill.png]]
I combine the ethical theory of utilitarianism with the harm principle, which states that for as long as an individual is not harming others, than an individual should be allowed to do what they please. This is were my individual takes come from. I am a staunch supporter of things like freedom of speech and expression, and I'm against most forms of government censorship, If an individual is not harming others, then they should be allowed to do what they want to do regardless if I personally find it disgusting or not, because trying to stop the person from doing what they are doing is immoral than trying to stop them due to what I said previously, regardless of what some form of authority tells me (this means any authority, spirituality, community, ect, all forms of authority besides the government which grants us these rights are above the harm principle). All within reason of course, because sometimes it is necessary for the state to intervene on behalf of the daily lives of citizens for harm reduction, but even then, the most it should be is just encouragement, unless there's a deadly plague or something.

[[File:Hedonism.png]] Hedonism [[File:Hedonism.png]]
I would consider myself someone who has no restraint when it comes to topics like sex and material desires, my way of thinking is borderline libertine in this aspect. However, I still respect basic human decency and common sense of morality, so it would be a moderate version of libertinism. This is largely due to my ADHD, which causes me to have a harder time controlling my impulses. So, for a lack of better words, I am a very horny person, I love masturbating and other things like that because it is super fun and it is of great sensual pleasure for me personally, so I'm naturally going to do it, and see no reason otherwise, which is what my morality is built off of. Hedonism has always been one the core pillars of my beliefs largely due to my impulsivity, which has naturally has made me a very individualistic person as well.

[[File:Antinil.png]] Anti-Nihilism [[File:Antinil.png]]
Despite my hedonistic stances on ethics, I am opposed to pessimism and nihilism. Now, this may sound strange, because hedonism as a philosophy is usually followed up with nihilism as a justification, because we have no greater in purpose in life and nothing matters, I can do whatever I want with there being no grounded moral justification against it otherwise. I don't agree with this, just because life is pointless doesn't mean the future is pointless, nor is their no purpose in living. The meaning of life is what you make it to be, and creating our own joy in life. Even if said joy itself won't amount to anything, it's better to use your own existence to enjoy your life than it is to be pessimistic or nihilistic.

[[File:Pop.png]] Populism [[File:Pop.png]]
Populism is a good way to achieve political power and to unite the world using pan-nationalist movements. So, I would incorporate populist heretic for both political praxis and international praxis. However, the creator of the page personally disagrees with populism to a certain extent, and many populist leaders in history have failed to deliever on their promises and actually just ended up serving the elite themselves, he views it as a good way to achieve his objectives.

[[File:Pragmat.png]] Pragmaticism [[File:Pragmat.png]]
I am a political realist, the best way to make change is through a pragmatic approach. So, I am opposed to both romanticism and idealism. As, while idealism is to an extent, necessary, you have to do things that go against your own ideas to inspire change. Even if it means compromising on your own ideals, it's better to have some of the change you wanted, compare to having nothing at all. And as such, harm reduction is very much necessary to achieve change.

Main Influences
Epicurus (341BC-270BC) Franklin D. Roosevelt (1882-1945) Theodore Roosevelt (1858-1919) Al Gore (1948) Marquis de Sade (1740-1814) John Locke (1632-1704) Albert Einstein (1879-1955) Mikhail Gorbachev (1931) Barack Obama (1961) Edward Snowden (1983) Julian Assange (1971) Ed Miliband (1969) Huey Long (1893-1935) Mizuho Fukushima (1955) Alexei Navalny (1976) Olof Palme (1927-1986) Sviatlana Tsikhanouskaya (1982) Roman Albertovich Abalin (1998) Joseph Stiglitz (1943) George Orwell (1903-1950) Martin Luther King Jr. (1929-1968) John Stuart Mill (1806-1873) Joseph Lancaster (?) John Maynard Keynes (1883-1946) Greg Guevara (1997) Bernie Sanders (1941) Ian Kochinski (1994) Petter Vallentyne (1952) Mustafa Kemal Ataturk (1881 - 1938) Jeremy Corbyn (1949) Elizabeth Warren (1949) Hillel Steiner (1942) Rick Falkvinge (1972) June Nicole Lapine (1991) Joshua Wong (1996) Agnes Chow (1996) Leung Kwok-hung (1956) Nathan Law (1993)

Personality + Stylistic Notes
He loves playing hoi4 and other paradox related strategy games, although he isn't too good at them. He dislikes most political extremists, and will get uneasy around them, which is noted by the fact that he often calls them "retarded hoi4 larpers" when encountered with them. Although, he's in-general fine with people's beliefs so long as they aren't being pushed onto him or they aren't extreme, and he hates this elitist culture war nonsense that only distracts people from class issues. He's super horny, and loves jerking off because it is fun to do, despite what some people think that is gross to say outright, he doesn't care.

History
It all started back in the summer of 2016, when he was browsing youtube and got recommend a video titled "Alternate future of the world" by a channel called Romanian Mapping, which featured aforementioned balls. This peaked his interest and quickly became one of his favorite interests, which served his my entry to the polandball fandom. Around in summer 2017 he got recommended a video by a content creator named "ISorrowProductions", which served as his entry to strategy games and Hearts of Iron 4, to which I bought back in November of 2017, and would revitalize my interest in the polandball fandom as those two are deeply connected (obviously).

He stopped watching mapping content back in early 2018 because the content was getting pretty stale, but I still liked Country balls and its fandom, but because of this sudden loss of interest in mapping content, he became less active in watching Polandball related content (although I still liked creators like ISP and Alex The Rambler). Around 2020, I got recommended a video called "The political compass rap" by a content creator known as "Jreg" (which many of you here most definitely know) by a friend in this private discord server that I no longer associate with, due the friend in question having been accused of doing so really bad things (nothing illegal, just being a general douche to others I associated with).

After I got recommended this video by my friend, this was the moment I got introduced into politics into any real capacity that actually interested me (although I never liked r/politicalcompassmemes because I saw it as a really politically illiterate subreddit). This same video and memes related to the political compass would serve as my entry into the polcompball fandom, I would quietly lurk around the subreddit back in early 2021. He created his new reddit account back in 2021 and started using it mid summer, however, he never used his old 2017 reddit account due to him post a lot of admittedly cringe stuff he never wants anyone to see.

He himself hasn't been active in any sort of discord related servers in this community due to him having lost most of his interest in discord after the events that happened, but he has been active in a couple offshoot communities related to political tests. However, he still lurks on discord with his friends which is how he is still in contact with them, but none of which are related to this community, but just politics and gaming in general. It was in similarly politically related servers that he had gotten into a lot of heated arguments with far-right groups and conservatives that caused him double down on his own progressive ideals. But, outside of these incidents, he has remained mostly drama free outside of political communities. And, has even befriended one of his old friends he used to talk to from 2019. So, he's sure of his own political positions and will not change them any time soon.

Apolitical period
(2003 - 2012) - Apolitical Childhood Period

The title says it all, I knew nothing about politics at this time because I was a child. None of us start political.

/ (2012 - 2013) - Apolitical Social Liberalism Period

The closest thing I had to any coherent political beliefs as a child was being against the current Republican nominee during the 2012 election, mostly influenced by my parents who were pretty liberal for their own views back in the day. Keep in mind, my grasp on politics was next to none. But I knew just a little bit, mostly from my parents. I was still apolitical as I lost all of my interest in politics after the election happened.

/ (Mid 2013) - Monarchist Larp Period

I was larping as a Monarchist for the summer of 2013, I didn't legitimately believe in Monarchy as a form of government, I just thought it was funny.

/ (2013 - 2014) Homophobic Period

This part was the most socially conservative bit of my political journey, I was brainwashed by some group of people at school who I hung out with to hate Gay people. This was because homophobia was relevantly common back then.

// (2014 - 2016) Apolitical Progressive Conservative Social Liberalism Period

It was around this bit when I chilled out with some of my beliefs. As I was exceptionally childish and an easily influenceable person due to how little I knew at the time. Once I got out of that environment, I dropped my beliefs as I held no real hatred of LGBT individuals. So, the beliefs around this time were probably a progressive conservative social liberal. As, I still held some of my previous views from my parents. But, I was skeptical of the T part of the LGBT community. As, even my family was who was relevantly progressive about this issue was, which influenced my opinion. But, thought that abortion rights were cool and didn't see anything morally wrong with it.

Illiterate Political period
/ (Early 2016) Entering 2016

It was around the beginning of 2016 that I truly got the feel for politics, and began to understand more and more of our political climate as I grew up. With all of this, I still disliked mainstream news as it was too confusing for me to keep up with, so I still was relevantly confused about my politics for this period entering 2016, as I only grounded my political beliefs based on a few I had held previously without much insight to our political climate. But, because I didn't outright reject politics at this time, I would say I wasn't outright apolitical, as much as I just illiterate.

/ (Mid 2016) The 2016 Presidential Election, Part 1

The 2016 President election is were it all started. It was around when the election was beginning I looked into both of main nominees of Trump and Hillary, which I disliked both of them, seeing them as twofaced morons that were unlikable. Especially the racist things trump said about Latinos which my father told me about, this caused me to look into third party candidates.

// (2016 - 2017) The 2016 Presidential Election, Part 2

With my exploration of the political climate, I found myself adopting more views and agreeing with people like Bernie and other left-wing democrats, as I saw those candidates as likable compared to the previous candidates I encountered. With this, I would watch videos related to such topics. While I wasn't exactly socially conservative, I did get the wrong idea about some things entering into politics by watching the stereotypical "anti-sjw" videos due to not having the best grasp of the political climate at the time, I did watch a couple and it influenced my opinions on things like feminism. And, due to the heavy presence of "anti-sjw" topics related to some of these videos endorsing these candidates, it would further warp my views on such topics like feminism. This is were my political journey truly began.

Early Modern Period
///////(2017-2019) "Anti-SJW" Period

This part was just outright confusing looking back on it, my beliefs were understandability shaped by some of the videos I watched and some video games I played. And while I had no real stance on religion at the time, and wasn't even religious, I still had a general dislike of religious authority due to having never had a single good experience with it, this would cumulate whenever I watched some videos of people making fun of religious conservatives and agreeing with a lot of what these videos had to say, and affirming my own philosophical religious belief about materialism. However, I never watched any of the atheist skeptic community stuff on youtube, as I never had any interest in religion or religious debates itself. My economic beliefs started to change as well to fit the economic beliefs of the candidates I looked up to. This shift happened for a couple of reasons: me discovering strategy games, exploring different political candidates as previously mentioned, and watching youtube videos related to such topics. I became more economically left. And, while I had no stance on globalization at the time, due to the some of the populist rhetoric I had encountered from these videos I watched, I disliked globalism. However, I didn't know a lot about foreign policy, so I really couldn't call myself a nationalist. Along with having a bad idea of what feminism was, I thought it was just a bunch of men-hating social justice warriors whining about some imaginary patriarchy that didn't exist, along with trans people not being real. (However, I was not some Manosphere type person which is often associated with anti-feminism, as I didn't believe in any of that nonsense) But, I still supported some feminist ideas like abortion rights. So, my overall beliefs weren't conservative per-say, so much as they just represented the counter-culture present within this time period, and were just ultimately ill-informed due to not being knowledgeable about these things at the time. I was just an edgy degenerate who was in an environment were shock humor was normal and we made fun of each other even though most of us were (especially me) massive degenerates behind the scenes, that's cringe culture for you, we were all hypocritical children bullying people for their own passions and hobbies while hiding our own hobbies that we would be made fun for. I was a typical counter-culture atheist around this time.

/ (2019 - 2021) Becoming More Progressive Period

It was around of early 2019 that I came the realization that I had more agreement with progressive talking points more than I did with conservative talking points, and that some of the anti-sjw beliefs I held really didn't fit my cultural views. With this, I became more socially progressive and began dropping a lot of my ill-informed views that I had picked up. Along with becoming less critical of feminism and trans people. I began engaging with more progressive circles in politics. Which, is what I desperately needed around this time. As, my social beliefs were contradictory and didn't truly reflect what I thought. However, I still disliked the more SJW bits of progressivism, like pride culture and political correctness, but I stopped viewing it in the same lens I did last time. Because, when I was in these spheres of political discussion, it seriously made me reflect on my previous views and how cringeworthy these takes were.

/// (Mid 2021) Anti-Populist Period

I don't know how this started, I began to have a serious disliking for populism and unironically became an economic and diplomatic globalist, I supported free-trade and regional unions like the European Union. My beliefs started to sway backwards to a more third way style social democrat while still being a pacifist. I genuinely do not like this period of my political adventure, as it threw away a lot of the values I had previously picked up. It was even funnier considering I was still pandering myself as someone who was against neoliberalism and supported left-wing democrats when I was just a neolib in denial at that point. I even started to support multiculturalism (which many progressives support, but I didn't support it before this period). And, while I was never necessarily a nationalist, I opposed globalism due to the populist rhetoric I picked up from my anti-sjw phase, that all changed somewhere around the time of August of 2021, as I grew distain of populism, I also grew a distain for nationalism. Once again, I seriously hate this period of my political journey. My social views became even more progressive as my hatred of social conservatism grew more and more, I ate up all this postmodern junk in this process just out of pure spite for conservatism. And, I would become fully supportive of things like LGBT rights and movements like BLM because they opposed conservatism, even if I didn't fully agree with the tactics they used, I still was pretty anti-religion (not anti-theist mind you) at this time, and wasn't afraid to criticize religious beliefs, but I contradicted this with being apologetic towards religions like Islam. It's ironic, I became the woke SJW I swore to destroy back then, and I am deeply ashamed of this period on a personal level. Not because I became more progressive, that was what I desperately needed going into politics, as my individualist stances were more in-line with social progressivism than social conservatism, but because I bought into this "woke preachy identity politics" that I formerly condoned, and was the former reason why held distain for progressivism.

Modern Period
// (Early 2022) Regaining My Roots

I started to regain my root political ideas when I got out of some the political rabbit holes I had gone down which caused me to abandon the previous ideals I held such as anti-populism and globalism. However, it took a while to regain a lot of my political roots overtime, as even though I had learned a lot about politics, I still fell way too easily into rabbit holes that went against my own beliefs, so they were contradictory due to this. I re-adopted left-wing populism and more protectionist views of trade. However, I still believed in things like multiculturalism and other nonsense like that, which would slowly change over time

///// (Mid 2022) Adopting Georgism

It was around sometime during July that I read up on Georgism after having it recommended to me as a political ideology by someone on discord, as there was a couple of people with the same ideology as me who held this view of land. So, I gave it a look, and I found a lot of agreeability within Georgism and its view on land. So, after a couple of days day, I adopted Social Georgism into my political belief set. It was also around this time I readopted left-wing nationalism into my ideology as well.

///// (Late 2022 And Onwards) Solidating My Beliefs

Now, this is were I basically stand. I am a left-wing populist social democrat. It was also around the time of summer of when I started to fully embrace my original roots. I also looked into Georgism around this time as well, and became skeptical of land speculation all together. With this, I stopped believing in landlords, and thought that a land value tax is the best way to tax land. I still maintain my culturally liberal beliefs, but I do not support things like intersectional identity politics or events like pride like I used to, as idpol in-general, regardless if it's a progressive or a conservative doing it, is cringe and preachy. So, this is ultimately the last phase of my political journey. I stopped going down unnecessary political rabbit holes that contradicted my views, stopped subscribing to this whole meaningless culture war bs, and solidated my beliefs to make them fully consistent.

Overview
So, to reflect on my entire political journey, I started off as apolitical like anyone else, then was an apolitical modern liberal when I supported democratic candidate Barrack Obama, but quickly became apolitical. Had a few hiccups during my apolitical phase, but got back to my original roots, then fell down a rabbit hole of left-wing anti-sjw videos, became a Bernie Sanders supporter in the process of all of this, and slowly got out of that "anti-sjw" phase. This followed up with me gradually accepting more progressive ideals while not buying into the preachy woke idpol stuff, but then completely forgoing of everything I had picked up from this point period by going into political rabbit wholes that contradicted my own beliefs, causing them to shift backwards, then becoming a full on woke Baizuo and a neoliberal puppet after consuming a bunch of postmodernist junk just because I hated conservatism. After I realized these beliefs were stupid, I started to pull back to my original populist social democratic roots, while still being almost fanatical about LGBT rights and other progressive policies. I got more nationalistic over time as well, and less progressive too. Now I've gone through my post-baizuo SJW phase, and I have adopted actually sensible social policies that aren't out of a response towards having a bad time with conservatives, but were still culturally liberal, and these beliefs now are likely not to change into the future.

My Political Journey
> >  >

Dad
Social Liberalism
 * [[File:Progress.png]] Progressivism
 * [[File:Socdem.png]] Social Democracy
 * [[File:Civlibert.png]] Civil Libertarianism
 * [[File:Humanismpix.png]] Humanism

Mom
Liberal Conservatism
 * [[File:Fiscon.png]] Fiscal Conservatism
 * [[File:Protect.png]] Protectionism
 * [[File:Modnat.png]] Patriotism

Sister
Social Libertarianism
 * [[File:Progress.png]] Progressivism
 * [[File:Bhl.png]] Bleeding-Heart Libertarianism
 * [[File:Raddem.png]] Radical Democracy

Granddad
Libertarian Conservatism
 * [[File:Xbert.png]] Christian Libertarianism
 * [[File:Honk.png]] Satirism

Grandma
Apoliticism
 * [[File:Moder.png]] Moderatism

Closeted Discord Friend
Satirism
 * [[File:Liberty.png]] Free Speech Absolutism
 * [[File:Blacknat.png]] Black Nationalism
 * [[File:Soccap.png]] Social Capitalism
 * [[File:Modprog.png]] Moderate Progressivism

Alexander
Liberalism
 * [[File:3way.png]] Third Way
 * [[File:Antifa.png]] Anti-Fascism
 * [[File:Glib.png]] Green Liberalism

Nouh
Democratic Socialism
 * [[File:Libsoc.png]] Libertarian Socialism
 * [[File:Leftpop-0.png]] Left-Wing Populism
 * [[File:Ecosoc.png]] Eco-Socialism
 * [[File:Nordmodel.png]] Nordic Model

Mark
Moderatism
 * [[File:Neoliberal-icon.png]] Neoliberalism
 * [[File:Radcent.png]] Radical Centrism
 * [[File:European_Federalism.png]] European Federalism

Political Compass Test


Economic Leftism / Economic Rightism (x): -2.00 Social Authoritarian / Social Libertarian (y): -5.44

Test Result: Libertarian Unity

SapplyValues


Equality / Markets (x): -2 Security / Freedom (y): -1.67 Progress/ Tradition (z): 6.56

Test Result: Center-Left

SHODANSapplyValues


Equality / Markets (x): -1 Security / Freedom (y): -1.7 Progress/ Tradition (z): 11.5

Test Result: Center-Left

8Values
Equality 66.0% / 33.0% Markets (Social)

Nationalism 23.3% / 76.7% Globalism (Internationalist)

Liberty 71.5% / 28.5% Authority (Liberal)

Tradition 17.6% / 82.4% Progress (Very Progressive)

Ideology: Social Democracy

NewValues
Equality 62.6% / 37.4% Markets (Social)

Nationalism 27.4% / 72.6% Globalism (Globalist)

Liberty 57.1% / 42.9% Authority (Moderate)

Tradition 22.9% / 77.1% Progress (Very Progressive)

Ideology: Social Democracy

Statecraft Compass
Democracy 75.0% / 25.0% Autocracy

Liberty 66.0% / 34.0% Security

Equality 74.0% / 26.0% Competition

87.0% Progress / 13.0% Tradition

Closest Ideology: Leftism

Furthest Ideology: Fascism

9Axes (Short Version)
Federalism 60% / 40% Unitarism (Moderate Federal)

Democracy 70% / 30% Authority (Democratic)

Globalism 75% / 25% Isolationism (Globalist)

Militarism 25% / 75% Pacifism (Pacifist)

Assimilationist 40% / 60% Multiculturalist (Moderate Multiculturalist)

Security 35% / 65% Liberty (Moderate Freedom)

Equality 65% / 35% Markets (Moderate Equality)

Secular 100% / 0% Religious (Fanatic Secular)

Progress 75% / 25% Tradition (Progressive)

Ideology: Social Democracy

9Axes (Long Version)
Federalism 60% / 40% Unitarism (Moderate Federal)

Democracy 70% / 30% Authority (Democratic)

Globalism 75% / 25% Isolationism (Globalist)

Militarism 25% / 75% Pacifism (Pacifist)

Assimilationist 35% / 65% Multiculturalist (Moderate Multiculturalist)

Security 35% / 65% Liberty (Moderate Freedom)

Equality 64% / 36% Markets (Moderate Equality)

Secular 80% / 20% Religious (Extreme Secular)

Progress 78% / 22% Tradition (Progressive)

Ideology: Social Democracy

12Axes
Federalism 61.0% / 39.0% Unitarism (Federal)

Democracy 71.5% / 29.5% Authority (Representative Democracy)

Security 36.0% / 64.0% Liberty (Liberal)

Internationalism 76.0% / 24.0% Nationalism (Internationalism)

Militarism 25.0% / 75.0% Pacifism (Non-Aggressive)

Assimilationism 35.0% / 65.0% Multiculturalist (Polyculturalist)

Collectivize 50.0% / 50.0% Privatize (Mixed Economy)

Planned 70.0% / 30.0% Laissez-Faire (Regulationism)

Protectionism 41.5% / 58.5% Globalism (Moderate)

Irreligious 82.0% / 18.0% Religious (Atheist)

Progress 75.0% / 25.0% Tradition (Progressive)

Technology 75.0% / 25.0% Bio-conservative (Technological)

Ideology: Social Liberalism

AmericanValues
Conservatism 20.2% / 79.8% Liberalism (Very Liberal)

Cooperation 68.0% / 32.0% Individualism (Collectivist)

Globalism 67.1% / 32.9% Isolationism (Globalist)

Freedom 55.6% / 44.4% Security (Moderate)

Doctrinial 63.8% / 36.2% Textual (Doctrinal)

Centralism 50.0% / 50.0% State's Rights (Balanced)

Ideology: Progressive Democrat

LeftValues
Revolution 5.9% / 94.1% Reform (Extremely Reformist)

Scientific 35.9% / 64.1% Utopian (Utopian)

Central 46.7% / 53.3% Decentral (Neutral)

International 75.0% / 25.0% National (Internationalist)

Party 92.3% / 7.7% Union (Extremely Partisan)

Production 38.9% / 61.1% Ecology (Ecological)

Conservative 26.5% / 73.5% Progressive (Progressive)

Ideology: Social Democracy

CapValues
Free Market 41.7% / 58.3% Corporatism (Regulationism)

Futurism 70.8% / 29.2% Conservatism (Progressivism)

Autocracy 36.5% / 63.5% Democracy (Representativism)

Authoritarian 44.4% / 55.6% Libertarian (Libertarianism)

Environment 61.1% / 38.9% Productivism (Sustainability)

Land Rights 40.0% / 60.0% Georgism (Land Value Tax)

Anti-Clerical 80.3% / 19.7% Religious (Atheism)

Globalism 70.8% / 29.2% Nationalism (Internationalism)

Interventionism 40.0% / 60.0% Isolationism (Non-Interventionist)

Accerlation 66.7% / 33.3% Deceleration (Research)

Elitism 29.2% / 70.8% Populism (Popular)

Disunity 75.0% / 25.0% Unity (Enemies)

Ideology: Social Meritocracy

LiberationValues
Moderate 70.9% / 29.1% Radical (Labourism)

Left-Unity 51.9% / 48.1% Lib-Unity (Generalist)

Centralized 50.0% / 50.0% Decentralized (Balanced)

Localist 31.5% / 68.5% Globalist (Internationalist)

Traditionalist 23.7% / 76.3% Progressive (Very Progressive)

Reform 83.3% / 16.7% Revolution (Reformism)

Markets 68.8% / 31.2% Planning (Slightly Unregulated)

Ideology: Social Democracy

EconValues
Equity 62.5% / Competition 37.5% (Redistributed)

Horizontal 60.9% / Hierarchy 39.1% (Levelled)

Demand 60.9% / Regulation 39.1% (Permissive)

Centralized 50.0% / Local 50.0% (Neutral)

Automation 56.3% / Employment 43.7% (Industrialized)

Commons 73.4% / Rent 26.6% (Anti-Rent)

Birth Right 22.9% / Merit 78.1% (Opportunity)

Unionized 75.0% / Divided 25.0% (Pro-Union)

Closest Match: Social Democracy

EconValues (Updated)
Leveled 65.0% / Competition 35.0%

Horizontal 65.0% / Hierarchy 35.0%

Planning 65.0% / 35.0% Markets

Central 75.0% / Local 25.0%

Automated 60.0% / Employed 40.0%

National 55.0% / 45.0% Global

Closest Match: Social Corporatism

Next Matches: Yellow Socialism,  Social Democracy

Worst Matches: Anarcho-Capitalism,  Left-Rothbardianism,  Crypto-Anarchism

Top 10 Closest Matches: WIP

Top 10 Furthest Matches: WIP

AuthValues
Oligarchy 95.5% / Autocracy 4.5%  (Bureaucracy)

Capitalist 42.9% / Socialist 57.1% (Mixed Economy)

Elitism 10.0% / Populism 90.0% (Populism)

Prevention 35.7% / Deterrence 64.3% (Discouragement)

Diverse 87.5% / Uniform 12.5% (Polyculturalist)

Irreligion 62.5% / Theocracy 37.5% (Anti-Clericalism)

Best Suited 75.0% / Hereditary 25.0% (Meritocracy)

Auth Disunity 83.3% / 16.7% Auth-Unity (Disunity)

Closest Match: Paternalistic Conservatism

Right Values
Reform 72.2% / 27.8% Conserve (Reformist)

Intervention 65.0% / 35.0% Laisse-Faire (Regulationist)

Authority 35.0% / 65.0% Constitution (Democratic)

Particular 75.0% / 25.0% Universal (Non-Aggressive)

Theocratic 0.0% / 100.0% Separation (Secularism)

Accelerate 70.0% / 30.0% Decelerate (Productivism)

Assimilation 42.5% / 57.5% Multicultural (Neutral)

Ideology: Geolibertarianism

ConservaValues
Moderate 97.1% / 2.9% Radical (Center-Conservative)

Socialist 51.9% / 48.1% Capitalist (Centrist)

Authoritarian 50.4% / 49.6% Libertarian (Balanced)

Nationalist 29.2% / 70.8% Globalist (Diplomatic)

Conventionalist 87.3% / 12.7% Conspiratorialist (Conventionalist)

Ideology: Third Way

8Dreams
Altruity 57.5% / 42.5% Avarice (Realist)

Dominant 33.0% / 67.0% Insular (Ideological Pacificist)

Self 72.8% / 27.2% Totality (Individualist)

Stalwart 10.7% / 89.3% Hedonic (Hedonist)

Ideology: Social Kakistocracy

12Wackies
Altruity 54.7% / 45.3% Avarice (Realist)

Cosmocracy 81.6% / 18.4% Incognitism (One-World Government)

Self 66.1% / 33.9% Totality (Individualist)

Morality 54.7% / 45.3% Immorality (Average Joe)

Chaotic 65.0% / 35.0% Systematic (Self Isolationism)

Regressive 50.0% / 50.0% Replacement (Modern Technology)

Egalitarian 95.3% / 4.7% Supremacist (Post-Race)

Nihilism 116.2% / -16.2% Esoteric (Post-Religion)

Universalism 70.6% / 29.4% Urbanism (Continent)

Ochlocracy 70.0% / 30.0% Aristocracy (Elections)

Panculturalism 67.9% / 32.1% Monoculturalism (Cultural Blindness)

Destructionism -9.2% / 109.2% Irenic (Post-Aggressivism)

DozenValues
Equality 55.6% / 44.4% Property (Collective)

Coordination 63.2% / 37.8% Commerce (Regulated)

Dominion 42.4% / 57.6% Anarchy (Dispersed)

Permisison 80.6% / 19.4% Restriction (Tolerant)

Inclusivity 70.8% / 29.2% Supremacy (Respectful)

Heritage 24.3% / 75.7% Novelty (Progressive)

Ideology:

Next Matches: Social Democracy,  Techno-Populism

Worst Matches: Esoteric Fascism,  Jihadism,  Clerical Fascism

Top 10 Closest Matches: Top 10 Furthest Matches:
 * 1) [[File:Paleoliberal.png]]  - 100.00%
 * 2) [[File:Socdem.png]] Social Democracy - 98.02%
 * 3) [[File:E-Democracy.png]] Techno-Populism - 97.96%
 * 4) [[File:Libleft.png]] Left Libertarianism - 96.70%
 * 5) [[File:Nordmodel.png]] Nordic Model - 95.98%
 * 6) [[File:Socgeo.png]] Social Georgism - 95.72%
 * 7) [[File:NatProg.png]] Bull Moose Progressivism - 95.60%
 * 8) [[File:Socliber.png]] Social Libertarianism - 95.47%
 * 9) [[File:Radlib.png]] Radical Liberalism - 95.41%
 * 10) [[File:Soclib.png]] Social Liberalism - 94.22%
 * 1) [[File:Esofash.png]] Esoteric Fascism - 0.00%
 * 2) [[File:Jihad.png]] Jihadism - 0.00%
 * 3) [[File:Cfash.png]] Clerical Fascism - 0.00%
 * 4) [[File:Polpot.png]] Pol Potism 0.01%
 * 5) [[File:Nazcap-Hat.png]] National Capitalism - 0.06%
 * 6) [[File:Odal.png]] Odalism - 0.11%
 * 7) [[File:Reactlib-icon.png]] Reactionary Libertarianism - 0.17%
 * 8) [[File:Hoppef.png]] Hoppeanism - 0.18%
 * 9) [[File:Moncap.png]] Monarcho-Capitalism - 0.24%
 * 10) [[File:Nazi.png]] National Socialism - 0.27%

6Foundations
Care - [23/30] 76.7%

Fairness - [23/30] 76.7%

Loyalty - [9/30] 30.0%

Authority - [16/30] 53.3%

Sanctity - [12/30] 30.0%

Liberty - [18/30] 60.0%

Estimated Ideology: Social Democracy

PolcompballValues
Sincerity 65.0% / Irony 35.0% (Rational)

Jannyphobe 61.4% / Jannyphile 38.6% (Populist)

Veteran 35.4% / Newbie 64.6% (Apprentice)

Wholesome 71.4% / Edgy 28.6% (Goodwilling)

Horny 87.5% / Anti Horny 13.5% (Decadent)

Active 34.5% / Lurker 65.5% (Sometimes)

Standard 50.0% / Wacky 50.0% (Political)

Boring 33.3% / Schizo 66.7% (Neurotic)

Liked 66.1% / Disliked 33.9% (Appreciated)

Discriminatory 23.4% / Inclusive 76.6% (Accepting)

Behaving 55.8% / Misbehaving 44.2% (Behaved)

DiscriminatoryValues
White 42.5% / Black 57.5% (Racial Egalitarianism)

Matriarchy 55.0% / Patriarchy 45.0% (Feminism)

Jeunism 35.0% / Adultism 65.0% (Moderate Adultism)

Hetero 41.3% / Homo 58.7% (Sexual Orientation Equality)

Cis 41.3% / Trans 58.7% (Transgender Equality)

Malthusocracy 60.0% / Lipostrocracy 40.0% (Body Type Equality)

CulturalValues Test
Monoethnic 13.1% / 86.9% Multiethnic (Ethnic Abolitionist)

Monocultural 31.7% / 68.3% Multicultural (Slightly Multicultural)

Favoritism 4.6% / 95.4% Equality (Absolute Equality)

Tolerance 79.8% / 20.2% Separation (Tolerant)

Pro-LGBT 78.7 / 21.3 Anti-LGBT (Pro-LGBT)

Nation 34.5% / 65.5 International (Continental)

Religion 0.0% / 100.0% Secular (French Secularism)

Essentialism 1.1% / 98.9% Constructivism (Extremely Constructivist)

Closest Match: Post-Modernism

Vanguard Values
Demagogue 87.5% / 12.5% Technocrat (Party)

Planned 14.6% / 84.4% Market (Market)

One Country 25.0% / 75.0% Global (International)

Military 9.4% / 90.6% Peace (Peace)

Proletarian 71.9% / 28.1% Peasant (Proletarian)

Uniform 37.5% / 62.5% Tolerant (Mixed)

Traditional 15.6% / 84.4% Neoteric (Progressive)

Populist 96.9% / 4.1% Elitist (Everyman)

Closest Match: Democratic Socialism

Religious Values
Pro-Catholic 12.4% / 87.6 Anti-Catholic (Extremely Anti-Catholic)

Pro-Protestant 29.9% / 70.1% Anti-Protestant (Anti-Protestant)

Pro-Orthodox 26.4% / 73.6% Anti-Orthodox (Anti-Orthodox)

Philo-Semitic 46.3% / 53.7% Anti-Semitic (Neutral)

Islamophilic 29.2% / 70.8% Islamophobic (Islamophobic)

Pro-Buddhist 25.9% / 74.1% Anti-Buddhist (Anti-Buddhist)

Pro-Hindu 25.7% / 74.3% Anti-Hindu (Anti-Hindu)

Pro-Pagan 23.7% / 76.3% Anti-Pagan (Anti-Pagan)

Satanic 46.0% / 54.0% Divine (Neutral)

Religious 8.5% / 91.5% Atheistic (Fanatically Atheistic)

Closest Match: Secular Atheist

Dichotomy Philosophy
Materialism 75.0% / 25.0% Spiritualism

Egoism 66.7% / 33.3% Altruism

Idealism 32.0% / 68.0% Pragmatism

Hedonism 76.8% / 24.2% Asceticism

Nihilism 44.2% / 55.8% Moralism

Rationalism 72.4% / 27.6% Romanticism

Skepticism 87.5% / 12.5% Absolutism

Closeted Match:,  Objectivism,

AltValues
Individual 62.5% / 37.5% Collective (Individual)

Market 66.7% / 33.3% Planned (Regulated)

Essentialism 0.0% / 100.0% Constructivism Constructivist

Pragmatic 79.2% / 21.8% Idealist (Utilitarian)

Universal 84.4% / 16.6% Particular (Universal)

Ecological 37.5% / 62.5% Industrial (Balanced)

Politicized 54.2% / 45.8% Apolitical (Balanced)

Religious 18.8% / 81.2% Secular (Atheist)

Futuristic 66.7% / 33.3% Historical (Futuristic)

IdeoShapes
Civil Axis: Liberal

Economic Axis: Social

Societal Axis: Very Progressive

Diplomatic Axis:

Closest matching ideologies: Liberalism,   Social Democracy,  Left-Wing Populism,  Progressivism

Complementarily opposed: Neoconservatism,  Right-Wing Populism,  Conservatism

Furthest matches: Nazism,  Theocracy,  Anarcho-Capitalism

Religious Typology Quiz
Solidly Secular

Political Typology Quiz
Progressive Left

Dichotomy Political Philosophy
Overall Left 74.8% / 25.2% Overall Right

Naturalist 100.0% / 0.0% Transcendental

Deconstructive 70.9% / 29.1% Traditional

Equality 55.9% / 44.1% Hierarchy

Liberation 73.1% / 26.9% Control

Closeted Match: Critical Thinker,  Socialist

Dichotomy Economic Test
Protectionism 34.1% / 65.9% Free Trade

Inter-Dependence 63.0% / 37.0% Autarky

Libertarianism 50.6% / 49.4% Statism

Globalisation 38.9% / 61.1% Nationalisation

Commercial 70.7% / 29.3% Subsistence

Adhocracy 35.9% / 64.1% Bureaucracy

Flat Tax 26.1% / 73.9% Progressive Tax

CN Values
Equality 63% / 37% Market (Equality Bias)

Freedom 67% / 33% Authority (Freedom Bias)

Progress 80% / 20% Tradition (Progress)

Ecology 55% / 45% Production (Neutral)

Closeted Match: Social Democracy

Follow Ups: Industrial Party,  Feminism,  Complete Westernization,  Pirate Party

Sex Values
Masculine 0.0% / 100.0% Feminine (Feminine)

Hyper 78.1% / Hypo 21.9% (High)

Dominant 58.3% / 41.7% Submissive (Switch)

Deviant 31.3% / 68.7% Pure (Vanilla)

Affection 12.5% / 87.5% Hedonism (Hedonist)

Center For a Stateless Society
Economic Leftist 65.0% / 35.0% Economic Rightist

Social Liberal 89.0% / 11.0% Social Conservative

Civil Libertarian 83.0% / 17.0% Civil Authoritarian

Antistatist 52.0% / 48.0% Statist

Anti-Militarist 81.0% / 19.0% Militarist

The Political Sextant Quiz
Top Ideologies:

Civic Nationalism 100%

Kemalism 100%

Social Democracy 100%

Three Principles of the People 100%

Third Way 100%

Worst Ideologies:

Anarcho-Primitivism -50%

Classical Marxism -50%

De Leonism -50%

Mutualism -50%

Agorism -60%

Anarcha-Feminism -50%

Marxism-Leninism -67%

National Anarchism -50%

Synthesis Anarchism -50%

American Political Bloc Quiz
Progressive - 189

Green - 182

Mainstream Democrat - 156

Libertarian - 131

Acela Centrist - 120

Neoconservative - 90

Establishment Conservative - 68

Trumpist - 68

Political Personality Quiz
Utopian Virtuoso

Policy Priorities:


 * [[File:Prog.png]] Social Equality - 95%


 * [[File:Socdem.png]] Social Healthcare - 95%


 * [[File:Technocracy.png]] Education Reform - 90%


 * [[File:Envi.png]] Environmental Health - 85%


 * [[File:World.png]] Amicable Global Relations - 85%


 * [[File:Multicult.png]] Immigration Rights - 80%


 * [[File:Sec.png]] Law and Regulation - 60%


 * [[File:Cap.png]] Wealth Maximization - 25%


 * [[File:ChristNat.png]] Religious Fundamentals - 20%

Party Alignment:


 * [[File:Demcr.png]] Democratic Ticket - 95%


 * [[File:RepubUS.png]] Republican Ticket - 3%


 * [[File:Libertarian.png]] Libertarian Ticket - 13%


 * [[File:GreensUS.png]] Green Party Ticket - 33%

= My beliefs =

[[File:Dem.png]] Overview [[File:Dem.png]]
Mattism is a democratic ideology. Believing that, democracy has shown itself to be the least worst system, at least compared to all other forms tried. And, that countries without democracy are bound to fail compared to those with democratic institutions. Along with favoring reforms to our current system to make it more democratic and have an electorial system that is inclusive to more parties, and to fight corruption. He supports a constitutional  semi-presidential  federal  republic as his form of governmental system. Along with immigrant rights,  interculturalism,  secularism, ,  e-democracy, and  the scaling back of the surveillance state.

[[File:Liberal_Democracy.png]] Liberal Democracy [[File:Liberal_Democracy.png]]
Mattism prefers a government that is built for the common good for the people, and thus, a a republic. Specifically, a liberal democracy. However, he wants to give the population more say in government, and thinks introducing policies that bring direct democracy into the government are a good idea. And, is supportive of a semi-direct democracy. Seeing it as the ultimate compromise between either a representative democracy, and a  direct democracy. So, Representatives should be largely responsible for governance, while citizens can have more autonomy through popular initiatives and referendums, ect.

[[File:Semiprez.png]] Semi-Presidential System [[File:Semiprez.png]]
Mattism takes issues with the current presidential system we currently have, believing that this system gives too much power to one person compared to a  parliamentary system. He would seek to combine elements from both of these governmental systems to create a semi-presidential system, were a  president and a  separate parliamentary system co-exist in the government.

[[File:Consti.png]] Constitutionalism [[File:Consti.png]]
Mattism supports the creation of a constitution that establishes a separation of powers in our government and protects our civil liberties. The constitution will be interpreted as a living document and will be subject to change to fit the times. In this regard, he takes issue with the current constitution in our government, because it was written during a time that has long sense passed. He would write a new constitution to fit the modern day politics of the country.

[[File:Merit.png]] Civil Service Reform [[File:Merit.png]]
Mattism seeks to abolish the electoral college, seeing it as nothing more than an relic of the past that is barely functioning the modern day, and is disproportionately effecting third parties ability to compete, contributing to the two party dictatorship and the further elitism within these parties. With the ever increasing amount of people being disillusioned by our system, and not identifying with either democrats or republicans, he views this as a system that has to go. His first reform would to replace the electoral college vote with the popular vote. His other reforms would be to abolish the senate, seeing it as nothing more than upholding the elitism within the government, and preventing a lot of necessary reform. Along with a ban on corporate lobbying and gerrymandering. These reforms I would propose would, along with my other reforms, strengthen American democracy, prevent cronyism in our government, and give more people say in the government. As I believe our government shouldn't be for sale by massive corporations, it should be for the people, and make our overall system more meritocratic.

[[File:E-Democracy.png]] Electronic Voting [[File:E-Democracy.png]]
Mattism believes we need to push forwards technology that allow us to vote via things like, a phone, computer, ect. He is a supporter of an electronic democracy in this regard. However, realizing how vulnerable these methods are to outside influence, he opposes implementing these policies until we have the technology necessary to go through with it, but overall, he is supportive of the development of said technology. Voting via other methods will still be available and not be phased out. However, these policies would only be done on a local level, with things like national elections having to be done in-person or by mail.

[[File:Anti-Corrupt.png]] Whistle Blowers [[File:Anti-Corrupt.png]]
Mattism believes that people who expose government corruption shouldn't have to fear persecution, as the government and its institutions have a right to be inclusive and transparent with the population that is being governed. And, that any functioning democracy should work on ridding itself of corrupt officials in office.

[[File:Fed.png]] Federalism [[File:Fed.png]]
In terms of how the bureaucracy is administered, Mattism prefers local governance compared to a  unitary government, mainly due to how ineffective a unitary government would preform in the United States due to its size. He would recommend unitary governance is countries that are smaller and more homogeneous, but federalism in larger and more diverse countries. However, states governments have to abide by the national laws, and the constitution.

[[File:DefDem.png]] Defensive Democracy [[File:DefDem.png]]
Mattism believes the government should actively protect its institutions from those who wish to do them harm, as we cannot give them the freedom to tear down our democracy. This would function like a defensive democracy. If your party actively poses a threat to democracy, it shouldn't be included in government. Believing that freedom of assembly and speech has its limits, and where they use their voices to silence the voices of other people is enough to warrant this.

[[File:Intercult.png]] Interculturalism [[File:Intercult.png]]
Mattism supports interculturalism as an alternative to  multiculturalism or  monoculturalism. The former being a mishmash of cultures that will erase our national identity and undermine the social cohesion needed for a social democratic state, while the latter being too exclusionary to foreigners and causes people to not be accepting of people's differences. So, it allows for diversity at the local level, while still allowing for a shared sense of national identity. The type of intercultural model he supports is the  model. People shouldn't be forced to give up their previous cultures, but different cultures should stress the similarities instead of the differences between each group to ensure societal stability. This allows for each culture within society to have common values between each culture that hold them together, while all of them having the national identity as one unifying thing between all the cultures in society, thus, still maintaining a diverse local culture. However, he supports cultural autonomy for Indigenous groups, and improving their quality of life in areas where it needs to be improved. However, he is against things like land back and other radical initiatives, and thinks that they should at least adopt the national identity.

[[File:Civnat.png]] Immigration [[File:Civnat.png]]
Mattism's stance on immigration largely depends on the context of the country. But, in the United States, he takes a pro-immigration stance, and is in favor of liberalizing immigration, as immigrants help contribute to the labor force that is slowly shrinking each decade as America's population continues to age, while the birth rate declines. So, it's better to use this wave of mass immigration to our benefit. With addition to this, he supports giving illegal immigrants a legal pathway to citizenship. However, there will be a wait list where the immigrants have to be assimilated values before they can access any of the government programs, such as the welfare state. He also thinks it helps contribute to maintaining the social democratic state, as seen in the  Nordic countries. However, with less racism. Along with it being less destructive to the progressive movement, as cultures that do not tolerate our values will not peacefully coexist with us or a progressive culture.

In terms of how refugees will be handled, while he does support raising the cap of refugees that are taken in, he also realizes that some of the refugees we take in come from cultures that have arisen in societies that have backwards ways of thinking and hold anti-progressive and anti-western views. So, from war torn places like Syria, we should be prioritizing who is going to benefit our country most and tightly vet them, but, outside of that, they can come into our country so long as they don't cause trouble for anyone else in society. And, is against racism or  xenophobia that can be seen in many places like Europe after the immigrant crisis happened. He opposes the implementation of surveillance services and complete bans on immigration, as those are just purely motivated by the latter.

[[File:Secular.png]] Secularism [[File:Secular.png]]
Mattism is against any religious organization playing a role in government, or the government subsidizing religious organizations through a tax exempt status. Which is why he seeks the complete separation of church and state. This version of secularism differs from french secularism, as personal freedom is still respected and civil liberties relating to freedom of religion are upheld. People are free to worship whoever they want so long as it doesn't interfere with government policy making. So, there will be a strong wall between church and state institutions, religion will be separated from things like schools and most religious references will be removed from our government. But, things like religious festivals and public holidays are fine, and the government will recognize the most practiced ones as the public holidays for the country. Anyone has the right to express any belief they want as long as they aren't harming others and no forms of public expression regarding religion will be banned.

He's opposed to forced secularism, or  religious governance. As well, he thinks that people who deny basic science based on their religious beliefs are very cringe, and only hold society back. And, in this regard, he holds distrust of Islam, seeing as many third-world Islamic countries are riddled with  reactionaries  who use religion as a mean to further sentiment their rule, and how even  moderate Islam has been used to in the same vain as well. Not to say this doesn't apply to other religions, but, Islam in the modern day holds more relevancy. However, this is not to say he's against Islam or the people, he believes that they should be allowed to follow their beliefs, and is against discrimination towards religious minorities like Islam or Judaism, ect. He believes in religious plurality and tolerance so long as they don't push their beliefs down my throat.

He firmly sides with the, as his own personal beliefs are aligned with this group, and will support them against the influence of the  religious right. He sees their waning cultural influence as a good thing, as this group has been one of the greatest forces against progressive policies, along with just never having had a single good experience with this group of people on a personal level.

[[File:Civilib.png]] Civic Liberalism [[File:Civilib.png]]
Mattism is pro-privacy. Believing the expansion of the surveillance state in the United States hasn't been for the best interest of the people, but for the government to further its control over the general populace. He would enact reforms that weaken the surveillance state so it isn't so invasive into people's daily lives. This would include revoking the patriot act, and getting rid of other unneeded spying programs. As, he believes the government should be big enough to protect the people from harm and keep them safe, but should also should respect the personal privacy of daily citizens lives. Because, he's not opposed to things like CCTV cameras in public places, as those can be useful for deterring things like  crime. But, the further expansion of these services to include wiretapping into people who aren't even greenlit for investigations and personal things like phone calls leads to the ever increasing authoritarianism in Western states, and is a severe breach of privacy. The government should be there for the people when it is legitimately needed, and must be centralized enough to provide services for the country and  play a role in directing the economy, not making him civically  libertarian, but should also respect people's privacy and not intervene in the daily lives of citizens when it isn't necessary, not making him  authoritarian. So, this makes him a center libertarian.

[[File:Socdem.png]] Overview [[File:Socdem.png]]
Mattism's economic model is mainly modelled after social democratic corporatism. He primarily believes in strong market regulations to protect the interests of consumers and fix failures in the market,  pro-labor union stances to fight for worker's rights, a  mixed market economy, the creation of a  universal welfare state to redistribute wealth, a  land value tax to replace landlords under public land ownership, and wants to model an economy off of the business model of  worker co-operatives. He also takes many populist stances on economics with this in-mind, he believes in policies that  put the needs of our workforce first to strengthen labor against  globalist policies that threaten to weaken the power of labor unions in favor for  massive corporations, which only contribute to the current   neoliberal system. So, overall, he's your pretty average social democrat. He would classify himself as a left-wing social democrat with these views, as he adheres more to  classical social democratic economics seen during post-WW2 than he does with  right-wing social democrats which started to arise during the 1980's.

Despite his left-wing beliefs, he is skeptical of most forms of socialism, believing that  capitalism has ultimately shown itself to be the best economic system in most of its forms, with having the longest longevity compared to such economic systems. In spite of this, he believes that numerous regulations are necessary to keep this success, and to make the economy work for everyone. He takes great inspirations from western Europe and their social market economies,  welfare states, and  economic tripartism. As, these economic systems have created the most developed and happiest countries on earth. He wishes to create a Nordic style social democracy in the United States  that focuses on  the ease of doing business,  wealth redistribution, and  the wellbeing of every citizen.

[[File:Keynes.png]] Fiscal Policy [[File:Keynes.png]]
In terms of macroeconomics, Mattism is self-described as a Keynesian, he believes that the government should actively take a hand in the market and create fiscal programs that increase spending to boost growth in the economy. Supporting increases of spending during times of crisis to dampen the damage done during said crisis, to recover the economy. The type of keynesian economic branch he subscribes to would be closest to that of new keynesianism.

[[File:Social_corpratism.png]] Mode of Production [[File:Social_corpratism.png]]
Mattism's mode of production would combines elements from Neo-corporatism and  Dirigisme. He believes that the government should have its share in the market through state owned enterprises in sections of the economy that are naturally monopolistic, such as railways and electric grids. And, in sections of the private sector as well, which will compete with businesses within the market to guide the economy. These SOE's would be invested into through a sovereign wealth fund.

He advocates for class collaboration over  class struggle, seeing as classes do provide a benefit to society. And as such, the state should  to negotiate terms, with the state acting as a mediator between the two, seeing it as the best way to abolish class conflict.

[[File:SyndieSam.png]] Unions [[File:SyndieSam.png]]
Mattism supports trade unions and the right of workers to unionize, seeing the collapse of unions in the United States as disaster for both worker rights and the  progressive movement. So, in the labor market, there would be strong unionization of the working class, viewing unions as a favorable means to achieve working rights, along with it being necessary for the  progressive movement to keep political power. Trade unions and how they would be organized would be through. With state-owned unions and state-owned businesses making tripartite agreements even easier to ensure economic growth. However, he is skeptical of public unions, as their interests have often collided with the interests of society.

He is also against union busting, believing that it is unconstitutional. Only being allowed when there is legitimate reason to do so, like when the union in question doesn't have the best interest of the workers they are representing. And, he thinks that companies that partake in such practice should be severely punished.

[[File:Cooperative Socialism.png]] Worker Co-operatives [[File:Cooperative Socialism.png]]
Mattism defends worker co-operatives, and believes that  worker co-ops as a business model have shown to be superior to other forms of traditional business models. And, is in favor of an economy which has its primary business model made up of worker co-ops. Medium to small-sized enterprises should be ran as worker co-operatives, although, this won't be enforced, as he realizes that an economy made up entirely up of this business model cannot sustain itself, and other forms of traditional business models will be allowed. This will be encouraged through things like tax breaks and subsidizes. Along with being a supporter of workplace democracy, as he believes that workers should be allowed to democratically control the workplace the workers work in. It will allow the workers to have more say in the production they produce, while not directly handing over the means of production to the workers. With the further democratization of the workplace and economic control given the workers via these means, this would ensure the increase of working wages and the creation of more jobs.

[[File:Univhealth.png]] Healthcare [[File:Univhealth.png]]
Mattism is supportive of a, believing that it is detrimental to the nation to have people who cannot afford to pay for healthcare to be indebted just because they cannot pay. With the current healthcare system we have being more expensive with providing less coverage than it if it was just universal. He defends healthcare acts like Obamacare that expand healthcare coverage for people, but would prefer to transfer them into a universal healthcare system. Private healthcare options would still exist, as luxury for those who choose it, with the universal healthcare being the main option. However, preventable self-inflicted injuries such as drug abuse or being unvaccinated will not be covered, and that will directly come out of insurance or pocket.

[[File:Welf.png]] Welfare State [[File:Welf.png]]
Mattism believes that the state should play a  in one's life in terms of economics, to provide for the people, actively redistribute wealth, and promote equality of opportunity. With this, he is supportive of the expansion of the welfare state, and for the government to provide for goods and services to the people. He favors a universal welfare state as a way of redistribution of the wealth. Despite this, however, he isn't against private charities, and they will still exist. Given, they are certified to be a legitimate charity. As, he realizes the importance private charities play in both his life and the lives of many others, which would still be there. But, he prefers government solutions for redistributing income, seeing it as more effective.

[[File:NatProg.png]] Anti-Monopoly Laws [[File:NatProg.png]]
Mattism supports breaking up massive monopolies. As everyone knows, it is not good to have monopolies dominating an economy. In this case, he would support bringing back the strong anti-trust laws that were present during the progressive era of the United States. Along with this, the CEO's of said companies shouldn't be allowed to own any shares in the companies that are broken up. It's not good for any economy to have huge businesses dominating the market, as it lowers the competitiveness and the ease of doing business in said economy, which is bad for economic output and growth of the economy.

[[File:Protect.png]] Trade [[File:Protect.png]]
Mattism advocates for a fair-trade policy that protects our jobs and makes sure the products coming into our country respect human rights and labor standards. He is opposed to economic globalization because job outsourcing has caused our  manufacturing industry and  trade union movement to dissipate. Subsequently, being destructive for the progressive movement and contributing to the  corpocratic state we are living in now, which has created a system that concentrates all of the wealth into massive corporations, leaving local economies to slowly die. While at the same time, he is opposed to autarky because it has always lead to economic stagnation. With this, he supports low tariffs and economic co-operation between countries that have similar labor, environmental, and human rights standards. While supporting higher tariffs against countries that have worse labor, environmental, and human rights standards. As, he realizes that most countries cannot survive off of pure self-sufficiency, and protectionist policies have often lead to things like wars and the destruction of entire economies, but the need for a healthy balance is also present to benefit the working class and small business owners.

He encourages developing countries to form economic trade blocs that rival both eastern and western powers, as a way to keep both of the blocs from exploiting them. This would improve things like wages and environmental protections for said countries, with the added benefit of not being too reliant on either bloc.

[[File:Plutocrat.png]] Wealth [[File:Plutocrat.png]]
Mattism seeks the creation of high income and inherent taxes for wealthy families, along with wealth caps for CEO's, this will further weaken the influence of  elitist billionaires while redistributing wealth for our  social systems. However, he isn't opposed to billionaires existing, and realizes the benefits they have for our economy, but also realizes that they hold too much influence in our government and economy. So, if they are to exist, they should fairly contribute to the economy in taxes, respect environmental regulations, not offshore their wealth in other countries for tax avoidance, and not outsource our jobs to countries with lower wages. The wealthy people that do partake in these practices should be severely punished, and have all their assets nationalized by the government

[[File:Cap.png]] Small Business [[File:Cap.png]]
Mattism believes it is important to pander to small businesses and small business owners, because small businesses are better for local communities, workers, and competition. So, there will be numerious policies that favor small businesses over big businesses. Aforementioned trade policies that prioritize the local economy over the  global economy,  strong anti-trust laws, and  taxing small businesses lightly to achieve a thriving local economy.

[[File:Bankocracy.png]] Banking [[File:Bankocracy.png]]
Mattism believes in the creation of a strong central bank to regulate the supply of monetary units, as if the banking sector fails, then that brings our economy down too. This will ensure the economic stability of our economy. However, private banks will still be allowed to exist, given under extensive regulation. And, how the banks and credit unions would be ran would be dependent on the size of said bank. The banking sector should be controlled by economic experts to ensure that it stays effective.

[[File:Georgist.png]] Housing [[File:Georgist.png]]
On housing, Mattism views housing as a basic human right. And believes that this is were the market fails the most. He wishes to establish a land value tax to replace  property taxes. He supports. However, land value tax cannot be the only tax. As, the tax on its own wouldn't be enough to fund welfare programs. But, the reveune generated from this tax would contribute to the welfare state, making him a Social Georgist.

With zoning laws, he would relax single-family zoning to allow for the development of income housing, which is more mixed for home buyers with different types of income. As, the housing crisis that this country is facing is causing social instability. He doesn't believe it makes a whole lot of sense to regulate land use. The land value tax coupled with the liberalization of zoning laws would fight off land speculation and strengthen tenant unions.

[[File:Corp.png]] Corporate Welfare [[File:Corp.png]]
Corporate welfare can be accurately described as "socialism for the rich, capitalism for the poor", and should end. He is against bailing out firms that are deemed "too big to fail". If a business is "too big to fail", then it is too big to exist. Seeing it as contributing to crony capitalism and favoritism within the economy. Were the wealth is being concentrated to the top one percent, with small businesses being left in the dust. He supports ending corporate welfare for big businesses. However, other forms of industry would still be subsidized, as he doesn't support ending corporate welfare entirely, just for those big businesses.

[[File:Regulationism.png]] Taxation [[File:Regulationism.png]]
Mattism favors high amounts of taxation to fund a universal welfare state, and the upkeep in social services for the population. And, these taxes will better help achieve equality of opportunity .The list of taxes that would be introduced would include:
 * [[File:Georgist.png]] Land value tax - This is to decommodify land ownership, the tax will be between 80 - 100%. As well, being a landlord can no longer be considered a full time job, but private ownership of land will still exist.
 * [[File:EconProg.png]] Wealth tax - The rich will be significantly taxed more through a progressive tax system. But, we cannot rely on just taxing the rich alone, as that isn't sustainable towards funding a welfare state. There will be various other methods used to get the most out of wealth redistribution.
 * [[File:Soccap.png]] Value added tax - A VAT tax will be used, as they've shown to be better at raising funds. And, with the added benefit that they are less easier to dodge.
 * [[File:Apolit.png]] Personal income tax - The personal income tax rate would be at 40%, this would be applied progressively as well, but that would be the median tax rate overall.
 * [[File:Envi.png]] Carbon tax - This tax would be to stop companies from polluting the environment with carbon emissions, it will be progressive.
 * [[File:DvCoordination.png]] Payroll tax - The payroll tax will be used to tax employ and employer income.
 * [[File:Religious.png]] Church tax - Churches will be taxed progressively based on their size. And, there will be more ways of taxing religious sites other than just directly taxing them.
 * [[File:Long.png]] Corporate tax - The ideal corporate tax rate would be 30 - 40%. Green technology companies would have a significantly lower corporate tax rate, as to encourage innovation.
 * [[File:Protect.png]] Import duties - This is to protect vital industry from foreign competitors. But, how high or low the duty is were it depends on where the goods come from. Like say, from a country we are on good terms with, there would be significantly lower import duties. But, countries that are used by companies for cheap labor or those that politically threaten us would have significantly higher import duties, to make those practices unprofitable, and protect the interest of American workers.
 * [[File:Krit.png]] Sin tax - Sin tax is needed to fund social programs. However, the former should be low as the tax is quite regressive and doesn't contribute a lot towards taxation. With only the most harmful goods (like drugs) being taxed at a significant rate, things like junk food and ect will be notably lower.

[[File:Social-ism.png]] Employment [[File:Social-ism.png]]
Mattism believes that employment should be handled through government programs that help the unemployed find employment in the labor market, through active labor market policies, such as  welfare to work. Ideally, the unemployment rate should be somewhere around 5 - 6%.

[[File:EconProg.png]] Minimum Wage [[File:EconProg.png]]
Mattism believes that Minimum Wage should be adjusted for yearly inflation, with wages being different for each job field you want to be employed in. The base line standard being a wage that allows you provide for yourself at the bare minimum, with states adjusting it to fit the needs of their population retrospectively.

[[File:CultLib.png]] Overview [[File:CultLib.png]]
Overall, Mattism is a socially progressive ideology that opposes  social conservatism. He believes that tradition stems from the past, and is not to be held sacred. And thus, favors a culture of permissiveness and tolerance, and is  culturally liberal. He is supportive of gender equality, ,  drug decriminalization,  criminal justice reform,  cultural secularism, ect. His beliefs largely following that of Civil Libertarianism and. Where individual rights and liberty are respected when they pose little harm to others, and the harm principle is upheld. Believing that, as long as the individual is not harming anyone, then in most instances, they should be allowed to do as they please. He seeks to create a humanist state based on  utilitarian ethics.

However, he rejects the  attitude current progressives have, and has a different approach to social reform. With this, he's quite critical of modern day progressives who obsess over things like group politics, as it is inherently reverse discrimination, it judges people based off identities like their race instead of their merit. These people promoting things like identity politics and political correctness strip people away of their individualism and are a false facade of social equality. At the same time, he's critical of  modern day conservatism and its waning cultural influence, seeing this as an inevitability, making him a  moderate progressive. He supports many progressive societal reforms while being critical of the methods and some of the things progressives advocate for. He believes in preserving non-harmful traditions that define our society while ridding us of the harmful traditions. The best example of this could be the country of Norway, which is a   socially permissive society, but conserves its culture and what defines it as a country. That is the type of cultural model he would follow. So, he rejects this whole culture war bullshit. he views    these sides as being dogmatic and victims of a  greater enemy that seek to divide people and keep corporate money on top.

These cultural views could be described as being a dirtbag leftist, as he's very much opposed to things like political correctness and identity politics, but is still very much opposed to most forms of social conservatism, supporting social equality and having a "live and let live" attitude while being against the more SJW bits of progressivism that go against said attitude, as they think they can tell you what to say or think, like what I just mentioned.

[[File:Gay.png]] LGBT [[File:Gay.png]]
Mattism, while being against  and hatred of them as individuals, is critical of the current LGBT movement and pride month. He sees the movement as being obsessed with identity politics, which is pandered by massive corporations. He supports, and for them to be treated towards that as of equals of heterosexual couples under the law for things like marriage and the workforce, but is against pride culture (this includes both straight and gay pride). However, there will be no former restrictions placed on these events themselves, so long as there's no kinks of nudity at them, that's freedom of speech and expression they have the right to exercise even if he disagrees with it.

Along with this, he recognizes that gender dysphoria is very much a real thing, and is in favor of transgender rights. He believes they should have the right to transition and change their gender on legally binding documents. However, he realizes the dangers of gender-affirming healthcare as well, and will put restrictions on it to prevent such dangers from happening. But, surgeries will be provided for by healthcare givers, as it is a form of healthcare. He's skeptical of the more radical concepts like gender fluidness and self-identification. He will recognize the sexualities that exist, Gay,  Straight,  Lesbian,  Transgender,  Bisexual, and  Asexual. And, while he recognizes that Intersex people exist, that will not counted as a separate gender. Xenogenders and neopronouns will not be legally recognized.

[[File:DvPermission.png]] Permissive Society [[File:DvPermission.png]]
Mattism defends a permissive society. And, believes that, as long as an individual's lifestyle doesn't violate the harm principle, then no government or community should be allowed to impose a specific lifestyle onto individuals. With this, he would decriminalize most victimless crimes, as there's no point in enforcing a law that cannot be enforced effectively. Along with it not making any sense to waste law enforcement resources on things that can be easily regulated to earn untapped money which could be used for things like government programs. As, societies that have increasingly liberal social views have higher rates of  egalitarianism in many fields, so it contributes to a more happier society overall.

[[File:Fem.png]] Feminism [[File:Fem.png]]
Mattism is a feminist ideology, and a staunch supporter of women's rights. He's against traditional gender roles, seeing them as a product of society, and not that of nature. Thinking it's best that women break free from the constraints of them, as this would ultimately contribute to a society were women are more free to decide their own paths in life, along with men being disadvantaged by these roles as well, it ultimately helps both sexes. There is no fundamental difference between a man and a women, both should sexes be treated the same and dealt the same punishes and rewards. However, he does realize that modern day feminism in the united states focuses too much on things like pointless intersectional identity politics, so his preferred form of feminism would combine elements from  first and second wave feminism,  men's liberation, and  postcolonial feminism that focuses on the equality of both sexes without the   men hating femcels or  women hating incel type groups of people. On the gender debate, while believes that gender itself is a social construct, he sees how societies have classified people based on the two gender binary having been the most easy and effective way to classify people, and doesn't believe there's any real reason for that to change. So, he will recognize the two genders that exist, male and  female.

He is firmly in the pro-choice camp in terms of the abortion debate. Believing that he choice ultimately lies with the women, and is morally right in most instances regardless of what the context is. And, as such, is for the liberalization of. Seeing as, a mother that bears a child she cannot financially support will strain our welfare services further, which will be detrimental to the welfare state. Along with seeing the label "pro-life" as inherently untruthful. As, many pro-lifers don't even care about the mothers health, or the welfare of the baby after they are born. And, even defend it in cases of rape or incest, which is just abhorrent in many ways. Along with not being supportive of welfare programs that help mothers, while supporting things like the  death penalty. And, while this isn't the case with all pro-lifers, as they come in many shapes and sizes, he still finds it awful that people defend forcing a mother to give birth all together, period. As, life doesn't start at conception, and is just a bundle of cells. So, it isn't murder. As well, banning abortion doesn't end abortion, but only ends safe abortions. So, he supports the legalization of first, and second term abortions. With third-term abortions being regulated where the women's life is in danger, rape or incest, ect. He is also for the wide spread availability of contraception, as being pro-choice doesn't mean pro-abortion, he wants comprehensive sex education to reduce the amount of abortions. He prefers abortions to be safe, legal, and rare. With this, he sees the overturning of Roe v. Wade as a disaster that has wasted decades of civil rights progress, and hopes that abortion rights get reinstated in the future.

However, he is against affirmative action, seeing it as the employers decision to hire based on  merit, instead of things like gender, race, ect. Seeing it as promoting discrimination that it seeks to fight, and pushes victim blaming onto people for how they were born.

[[File:GRights.png]] Gun Rights [[File:GRights.png]]
Mattism is neither pro-gun or anti-gun, he believes that people should be allowed to own guns, given they have no criminal back round. But, with this, he is a supporter of gun control, and believes in expanding things like backround checks and ect to make sure bad actors cannot get their hands on guns, which is what could be seen for the extensive gun violence problem this country faces due to the permissive gun laws of some of the states. And, while not wanting to outright ban weapons that are deemed "for war" like assault rifles, he wants extensive regulations on them, and should be made really difficult to get. Seeing as the majority of people will never own these types of fire arms, but still believing that people who want to own them and can actually afford them should be allowed to own them.

[[File:Scientocracy_Small.png]] Education [[File:Scientocracy_Small.png]]
Mattism believes our education system is in desperate need of reform. And, that education should be free from K-12, with college tuition being free as well, seeing tuition fees as stupid. With how things are taught, he is in favor of impartially, as things like History shouldn't be taught through a nationalistic lens. Along with teaching politics to our children to avoid the current gerontocracy our government is, but should be done in a neutral way that encourages students to pick their own beliefs. Public schools will be secular and based on  humanism. And, while he thinks it's good to teach students about injustices in society, he opposes the more radical concepts like he said previously, such as intersectionality as a lens to teach such topics.

In terms of schools and how they are administered, he believes that there should be a mix of private and public schools, with private schools as luxury, but shouldn't be funded through things like vouchers. With the attention going to meeting the upkeep of public schools.

[[File:Autism.png]] Disability Rights [[File:Autism.png]]
Being on the  himself, he's greatly sympathetic towards those with disabilities. As, he has naturally been reliant on these services into his adult hood to make him a functioning and self-relying person, so he is naturally inclined to support policies that expand the quality of said services and protect our civil liberties, as he could've used better services growing up. But, since he has passed that part in his life, he also believes in the necessity for self-improvement as well, as he has been through a lot of victim blaming throughout his life, which has made his experiences worse. So, he's opposed to things self-identification and politically correct terms, viewing these methods as downplaying the suffering of people (like me) who are diagnosed. He also dislikes how these disorders are romanticized in our current culture as well, making it even more self-defeating. Those who legitimately need help who cannot help themselves should get the help they need, but it also shouldn't be an excuse not to do anything productive as well, as can be seen with some people who are diagnosed with even minor cases.

[[File:Youth.png]] Youth Rights [[File:Youth.png]]
Mattism thinks its wrong to deny the rights of people based on their age, seeing the current system as too strict, and is supportive of youth rights. He believes that the voting age for local issues should be lowered to 16, with things like the presidency staying at 18. Along with more inclusion in things like the workplace, where there is a notable preference towards older people compared to younger people.

[[File:Equality.png]] Racial Egalitarianism [[File:Equality.png]]
Mattism is against racial or  ethnic discrimination, viewing these as irrational and a dangerous influence on society. Things like racial discrimination should be looked down heavily within society, and shouldn't be a factor towards things like immigration. He denies the concept of race existing, as biological race doesn't exist, however, he doesn't deny biological ethnicity, which does exist. With this, he is a civic nationalist, seeing a country is defined by a common way of life and culture. So, he is favor of complete racial equality, seeing racial and ethnic inequality as determinantal to a country that should be actively fought. As, all men, regardless of their back round, are created equal, and are entitled to the same rights with due respect for their differences. However, he hates how modern progressives  obsess over identities like race, because it is inherently discriminatory  | in the same way white nationalists do it, saying that people must do "this and that" based on identities like these are no different from groups like Neo-Nazis who obsess over the same things. So, he rejects an approach to solving systematic racism that relies on identity politics, viewing this as a form of reverse discrimination that is the exact same thing it tries to solve, because it judges people based on their traits like race and not on them as individuals.

With all of this, he used to support movements like BLM after George Floyd was murdered. However, he's critical of the current movement now as being filled with people who are obsessed with things like identity politics. As, the organization itself makes good points about police brutality that he does agree with, he disagrees with the tactics, seeing these tactics as not doing anything for actual racial equality. As well, he disavows the violence on both sides. So, he also opposes things like critical race theory for same reasons, he supports a  colorblind society were people are judged based on their character instead of their ethnicity or race. He also opposes movements like Antifa, as while the creator of this page holds vehement opposition towards all forms of reactionary and totalitarian ways of thinking, he sees the modern Antifa movement as being filled with activists who use the same tactics as the same fascists they claim to fight with things like free speech suppression and violence. His preferred form of opposition towards such movements are peaceful protests in the same way anti-authoritarian groups like  IronFrontUSA do it, as he doesn't believe in curtailing freedom of speech and expression just because the opposition holds political views that he doesn't agree with, but still thinks these groups of people should be socially ostracized for their beliefs as to discourage the spread of such beliefs. So, he supports tougher punishments for hate crimes and crackdowns on groups like the Alt-Right.

[[File:Health and Safetyf.png]] Public Health and Safety [[File:Health and Safetyf.png]]
For health crisis's like drugs or obesity, Mattism doesn't think outright shaming the people themselves is a good idea, as it just leads to them being rejected by society without being able to integrate or easily get help. But, he also doesn't think these things should be idolized as well, the state should campaign against these through things like advertisements and the like, but the state should never step in directly to correct the behavior of individuals themselves. He realizes the need for a paternalistic government for things like disasters such as pandemics for harm reduction, but when there isn't a serious harm to public health posed by an individuals lifestyle that directly harms other people, then the government should mostly lay off the general population. Things like sin taxes should still exist, as some milder forms of harm reduction that don't outright intervene in the daily lives of citizens are needed for society.

[[File:Multicult.png]] Identity Politics [[File:Multicult.png]]
Mattism is different in his approach to societal reform compared to many progressives, as he doesn't support the idea of identity , believing that one's own identity should not matter, and gets in the way of any  societal reform for socially disadvantaged people. This whole culture war  itself is manufactured by  massive corporations that seek to divide people for their own gain. People shouldn't be bound to an identity that they feel the need represents them, everyone should be allowed to have their differences, but we should also realize what brings us closer together as well, as there is no such thing as collective rights for individuals, there are only individual rights. He sees the rise of identity politics from both the left-wing and the  right-wing as destructive for American politics as a whole. With the left-wing focusing on pointless identity traits like "muh black lesbian trans" and the right focusing on "muh white straight conservative Christians". Both sides of the political debate are annoying, full of essentialist bullshit, and suppress individuality. With this, I also reject political correctness, as it treats everyone like babies while also suppressing individuality.

[[File:FDF-Pirate.png]] Copyright & Internet Reform [[File:FDF-Pirate.png]]
Mattism has views how large companies are abusing their power to infinitely extend copyright so their intellectual property stops from going into public sphere as unacceptable. Along with how giant tech companies mass farm users internet data just to increase their already massive profit margins, which creates many issues in of itself, and just the fact that it is unethical to do that. He is supportive of pirate politics. Seeing them as, monopolistic, greedy, and corrupt.

[[File:Egirl.png]] Pornography and Prostitution [[File:Egirl.png]]
Mattism believes that Pornography constitutes freedom of speech and expression, and should be allowed for those who are legally old enough to view it. On Prostitution, he believes it's the women's choice to sell her body or not. As long as it's done consensually, then it's perfectly fine, and should be legalized. He thinks the anti-porn movement is stupid, even more stupid and pointless than prohibition.

[[File:Civlibert.png]] Euthanasia [[File:Civlibert.png]]
Mattism supports the legalization of euthanasia, believing that if a mentally ill person chooses to voluntary end their own life, then that is their choice and their choice alone, and for it to be immoral & inhumane to let someone who is suffering when they choose to end their own life to let them continue living.

[[File:Klep.png]] Criminal Justice Reform [[File:Klep.png]]
Mattism believes that systemic racism is still well alive and present within the American justice system, despite how long we've come since Jim crow laws. And, as such, is a supporter of criminal justice reform. For police unions, he believes that police unions should still exist, but with their negotiating powers restricted. As, the importance of collective bargaining for cops is just as important for any job field, but realizes that the interests of society and police unions often collide, with it having been used to obscure criminal justice reform. With this, he would redirect wasteful spending to social programs. But, opposes the more radical notions of abolishing or defunding the police.

On prisoners and prisons, he opposes capital punishment, and believes that it should be outlawed in all the states. The justice system should focus on rehabilitative justice. With prisoners being allowed to vote once they've finished their prison sentence and have payed the price for their crimes. Along with the state having programs that aid convicts that are released to help them reintegrate into greater society. However, he realizes that some crimes are too bad to forgive. In this case, he would support punitive justice, but with the chance of parole. He opposes the privatization of prisons, as privatized prisons are bad for a rehabilitative justice system were the private contractors are only encouraged to make money, and not help with the reintegration of prisoners into greater society and disregard their own wellbeing makes public safety and the wellbeing of society worse off. However, while he does support racial sensitivity training for police, he believes it shouldn't be based on critical race theory or other  radically progressive things like it.

[[File:Envi.png]] Environmentalism [[File:Envi.png]]
Mattism believes that world governments aren't doing enough to combat climate change. All the world countries must globally co-operate with each other to put greater investments into green technology. However, he opposes how some green parties opposes nuclear power. As, while it's not perfect, the technology has come a long way, and is the most cost effective and efficient way of combatting global warming right now. Of course, we should work on transitioning out of nuclear power, but until that technology comes, and there's a cost effective way of doing that, we're going to have to rely on it for the time being. Along with supporting government initiatives like the green new deal, even if he has some disagreements with the former. He sees as a necessary step to transitioning out of fossil fuels for the near future, along with the trade deals for our country needing to respect environmental standards, as  free-trade neoliberal capitalism has lead to the exploitation of the environment. The government must start subsidizing green alternatives to weaken the fossil fuel industry. Although, he would prefer for the government to just nationalize most of these industries relating to natural resources, were these state owned businesses would contribute to a sovereign wealth fund which would go to things like the welfare state and other government expenditures.

[[File:Modtransh.png]] Technology [[File:Modtransh.png]]
Mattism supports the development of green technology to combat climate change, along with being supportive of  Democratic Transhumanism in terms of things like job automation, as if it is to happen, then that money should go to  social programs to combat the unemployment caused by job automation. However, he can't consider himself a transhumanist because of many reasons. But, he opposes those who think that technological development is bad. So, he's an overall technological moderate, realizing the both good and bad of technological development, he opposes technological acceleration because of the effect it would have on things like the environment, for example. But, he doesn't support slowing technological development as well.

[[File:Reform.png]] Reformism [[File:Reform.png]]
Mattism is a reformist ideology. And, in the context of liberal democracy,  left-reformism would be used to achieve my ideological goals. Seeing as, revolutionary means of achieving ideological change has often resulted in complete failure. However, there are some exceptions to this, being, places were democratic reform isn't possible. In that case, he would support a revolution against the government. Some of these places would include, China,, Russia,  Cuba, and other autocracies in the world that don't respect due process and political rights.

[[File:Blacknat.png]] Slavery Reparations [[File:Blacknat.png]]
Mattism doesn't support slavery reparations, as they are largely unfeasible. And, even if they were feasible, he still wouldn't support them. As, nobody in the present day is responsible for slavery or the actions of their ancestors. But, he does have other solutions to this issue, with his police reforms and getting rid of discriminatory zoning laws that disproportionally effect groups within these regions, these policies would combat poverty and crime seen within these neighborhoods, as the socio-economic factors do still need to be accounted for as well, and developing those socio-economic factors needs to happen.

[[File:Cball-CSA.png]] Confederate Statues [[File:Cball-CSA.png]]
Mattism supports the tearing down of confederate statues, they were traitors that succeeded from this country and represent  white supremacy, which shouldn't be glorified. Any self-described patriot should support the dismantling of the confederate statues, along with banning the confederate flag from being displayed on things like government property and discouraging the symbols for being used as a representation of the South. However, the statues being taken down should be done with context as well, so he opposes the tearing down of statues like presidents, but statues that specifically glorify the confederacy in a racist matter should be taken down, and ideally, replaced with statues of slave abolitionists.

[[File:Deepe.png]] Animal Rights [[File:Deepe.png]]
Mattism supports animal rights. As, animals are living beings at the end of the day. And, while not on the same level as Deep Ecology. He supports the the banning of most animal testing. As, animal testing isn't even guaranteed to produce good results, at the cost of inflicting unnecessary suffering to other living beings. He would also improve the living standards of animals being farmed for food, as the way they get treated is just excessively horrific. Although, he isn't going vegan, and doesn't expect anyone else to either.

[[File:Covidism-icon.png]] Vaccine Mandates [[File:Covidism-icon.png]]
Mattism believes that mandating vaccinations is necessary for the eradication of diseases. And, is both pro-vaccination and pro-mandate, but not on the same level as some countries like China. But, he views lockdowns as unfavorable, as they cause economic slowdown. With that, they should only be used during the start of a pandemic when there no vaccine development, with anything further from the release of a vaccine being a betrayal of the vaccinated people. As, while the government should be there to protect people in these types of situations, the excessive use of governmental power leads to the unnecessary expansion of things like surveillance services, as could be seen during the covid pandemic, which he is against.

[[File:FreeSpeak.png]] Freedom of Speech [[File:FreeSpeak.png]]
Mattism supports, seeing it as necessary for a country to keep the market place of ideas running. However, there will be notable restrictions on freedom of speech, such as things like defamation, hate groups, and protecting the public welfare of citizens. So, overall, he thinks freedom of speech should be near absolute, but not absolute. Seeing as a society were all ideas are tolerated would be a society that would eat itself alive, and would fall to the minority of intolerant people who would seek to undue those liberties that allow people to express themselves. He doesn't think outright censoring these groups of people is the right thing to do, he would prefer social ostracism to counter such movements. He is against hate speech laws, seeing them are inherently coercive to civil liberties, and not actually protecting the people said laws seek to protect the people that they are aimed towards. He does, however, hold a couple of exemptions with this view. Like in Germany for example, where it is a crime to deny  the holocaust, given the context of what happened in that region and where it happened, that should indefinitely stay a crime. But, he dislikes how the governments where laws like these are implemented go overboard with these laws as well, so he would loosen up those laws so they're not as strict. But, not eliminating them. So, outside of this few specific circumstances were these laws happen to be in some countries, he would oppose implementing them in other countries.

[[File:Mediastocracy_flair.png]] News and Media [[File:Mediastocracy_flair.png]]
Mattism believes that mainstream media is a decisive tool that has allowed for corporate money to stay on top, with the population being ever so clueless about alternative options, or the way they are being manipluated. Despite this, he thinks bringing back the Fairness Doctrine wouldn't do a whole lot to counteract this problem, mainly due to it being in a time period where it could actually be enforced. A better solution would to directly break up the hegemony of corporate media.

[[File:Laicism.png]] Cultural Secularism [[File:Laicism.png]]
Mattism, despite being a secular ideology, is skeptical of the influence of  organized religion on society and a  cultural religion, seeing these cultural influences declining in the Western world as a good thing. Because, these cultural influences have been used to push back against progressive policies like LGBT rights and  abortion rights, while giving rise to  religious fanatics in our government. This would make him an anti-clericalist. He would prefer for societal ethics to be based off of secular ones. As that contributes to the weakening of organized religion. Although, nothing that forces the secularization of society, as there will still be religious freedom. He argues that secularism will rise on its own without the state separating it from the public. This would be achieved through developing the material needs of population to the point were, religious influence subsides, with a rise of humanism and institutions shifting from religious to secular values follow up with it.

[[File:ProDrug.png]] Drugs [[File:ProDrug.png]]
Mattism believes that drug war was unilateral disaster that put many innocent lives in jail and only contributed to the prison industrial complex. He supports the, with soft drugs being completely legalized. Seeing as the "law" cannot even be enforced properly, it being a law in the first place is quite useless. Along with this, all non-violent drug offenders would be released from jail to free up law enforcement resources. However, there should be government programs available that encourage drug addicts to get off of drugs, and find healthier alternatives. As, drugs are a societal problem, not a legal problem. And, throwing people in jail for using these substances only further properates the core issues at heart.

[[File:World.png]] Overview [[File:World.png]]
Mattism, despite his left populist influences, isn't  Anti-American like how would you expect some of them to be. In fact, despite of what he thinks of the elites, the government, and ect. He sees that the West is the lesser evil between the major world powers, as the powers of the West uphold his views more than compared to those of the East. However, he doesn't support atlanticism. Because, while he would prefer to live under Western hegemony compared to the hegemony of other world powers, seeing them as being more often than not, authoritarian, oppressive, and conservative, he sees the West as being exploitative as well, and believes that no country deserves its hegemony. Along with this, he supports pro-democracy movements globally that actively challenge said oppressive authoritarian states.

He is a diplomatic. Believing that globalization and progress is an inevitability that cannot be stopped even if you tried, due to the nature of it. And, subscribes to international theories related to cosmopolitanism. With this, he is in favor international co-operation and allying with other liberal democracies in the world to promote peace and unity between them as a way to actively combat the rise of authoritarian states. In this regard, he is opposed to isolationism, believing that it has failed nearly each time it has ever been practiced in history, and the  United States has an obligation to help the world through. But, he isn't against nationalism, he would consider himself a civic nationalist. Along with supporting pan-nationalism, seeing as countries that have similar culture ties have the most to gain through co-operation, although without abolishing borders. Despite this, he has a rather protectionist view of trade, as world powers have used trade as a means to in-debt countries, he sees it as  neo-imperialism. So, with this, he supports Alter-Globalization. In terms of the military, he is a, believing that a policy of pacifism as a major power would be Disastrous, and thinks that the military influence of the United States should be kept, albeit in a limited form.

In terms of independence movements, he would consider himself an independence ally, and is sympathetic to people being oppressed under colonialism. This is where his Anti-Colonial stances come from, thinking that people fighting oppression in authoritative regimes should have the right to self-determination. However, he views independence movements in countries that aren't fighting against authoritarianism with suspicion. Foreign Policy=

[[File:Globnat.png]] Alternative Globalization [[File:Globnat.png]]
Mattism is a diplomatically globalist ideology, believing that globalization is inevitable process, and that the end goal of humanity should be to eventually unite together in some sort of global alliance as opposed to  uniting world governments into a decentralized world government to combat the problems of the modern day. He views a globalized world as an inevitability that should be embraced. As, it's important he help our fellow humans and strive for world peace, seeing things like isolationist policies as barriers that society should overcome. However, he opposes economic globalization. As, it has created massive wealth inequality, exploited the environment, and has caused the weakening of worker's rights in favor of massive corporations. So, his model of globalization would follow that of the alter-globalist model. Believing that, globalization can be shaped to serve the people globally, and not the interest of wealthy corpocratic elites, and wants to preserve the wealth equality of all countries globally. A form of globalization were: culture, economic equality, worker's rights, and everything else that I didn't mention are respected, with international co-operation still in effect.

[[File:Cosmo.png]] Cosmopolitanism [[File:Cosmo.png]]
Mattism firmly sides with the cosmopolitan on globalization, viewing globalization as an inevitability, and a good thing that makes the world far better off, as a world that is inter-connected is a one were war can be easily prevented between countries because they would have a lot to loose. He would combine these views with the global justice movement that seeks to combat the rise of globalization that benefits massive corporations, also known as  neoliberalism. He could be described as a  with these beliefs. Wanting some international organization like the United Nations as a stepping stone towards creating some form of global democracy that brings countries closer together and encourages co-operation between them.

[[File:Internation.png]] International Organizations [[File:Internation.png]]
Mattism doesn't have a problem with regional unions themselves, so long as they're bottom-up and democratic, seeing as how this is how developing countries have resisted developed countries exploiting them by doing this. And while he isn't against military alliances, as he recognizes that they are necessary for securing the national sovereignties of countries, these alliances must be purely for defensive reasons.

[[File:SocialistPatriot.png]] Social Patriotism [[File:SocialistPatriot.png]]
Mattism, despite being an internationalist ideology, doesn't reject  nationalism, seeing it as necessary for anti-colonial movements to take place and for the unity of a country. With this, he supports inclusive forms of nationalism like civic nationalism and  social patriotism. However, he also despises chauvinists, not seeing them as real  patriots of their country, but just as  edgy degenerates. One's nation and values should be shared off of a common culture and way of life instead of pointless things like  ethnicity,  religion, or  race. Seeing these forms of nationalism as unnecessary barriers for both our country and humanity that should be overcome.

[[File:Ecoglob.png]] Environmental Globalization [[File:Ecoglob.png]]
Mattism defends climate treaties like the Paris Agreement and other ones that , believing that we have to  look past our own borders to solve climate change and work with all countries globally, as it is an issue that will effect more than just us. Developed countries should be actively pressured to adopting climate protections and work together with other countries to develop technology that can solve global warming. However, developing countries won't be pressured as much, as they should still conserve their environment, but world powers are the greater evils in this situation. So, some destruction of developing countries environments for economic growth is fine, if it means they industrialize so they can be pressured into conserving their environment in the same way global powers will.

[[File:Cball-NATO.png]] The West [[File:Cball-NATO.png]]
Mattism is very critical of western powers due to their role in Imperialism, even if decolonization has happened, the West indebts developing countries with globalist organizations like the IMF and the World Bank, and is the biggest spreader of globalist capitalism that enslaves these countries we see today. Along with the rising authoritarianism in these states, with the governments enacting more and more policies that erode the right to privacy through things like crime bills and ect. However, with all of this in mind, he believes that the West is the lesser evil compared to the powers of the East due to them upholding his values more, but that doesn't mean he fully supports western powers. As the current atlanticist system is a bunch of neoliberal garbage that he just criticized, and has contributed to modern day imperialism in this regard. However, for the time being, he will support the United States against regimes like China or Russia for these reasons.

[[File:Euras.png]] The East [[File:Euras.png]]
Mattism is critical of the East in the same way he's critical of the West, as both sides are pretty imperialistic in this regard. Both have contributed to neo-colonialism of third world countries in a bid to gain more influence on the international stage. And, in some aspects, are worse than the West. Primarily for the reason that they are often authoritarian conservative regimes that do not respect human rights or progressive values. He believes Eastern powers should get out of developing countries, and let them decide their own fates without any major power budging in.

[[File:Pac.png]] World Peace [[File:Pac.png]]
Mattism subscribes to the idea that world peace is achievable. Now, while it seems very unlikely, as wars haven't stopped even in the modern day, the amount of wars being fought has significantly decreased over years due to the United States led international liberal world order. However, while this world order is better than the hegemonic powers of the East, it is not desirable in the same way hegemony from Eastern powers is not desirable, world powers will always be after their own self gain. And thus, will be the biggest threats to world peace. So, despite seeing the West as the lesser evil, the countries that pose the biggest threats to world peace are: China, Russia, and the United States. There's more to this, corporate power also poses a threat as well. He believes the hegomony of all these powers should slowly fade in replacement for a world system that relies on all countries to globally work together for the interests of the world. This is a pretty utopian way of thinking, and because it is. But, the first step we could achieve is by curbing the hegemony of the United States and China, as neither of them are deserved. However, Western values have contributed to the happiest populations and most successful countries, and should be the universal values for each country.

[[File:Postconan.png]] Anti-Colonialism [[File:Postconan.png]]
Mattism supports countries fighting for self-determination against  colonialism with his  anti-imperialist mindset,  neo-imperialism is something that should be actively fought against, as  global capitalism is a modern day evil that actively strips countries of their autonomies and cultures which enslaves developing countries to developed countries, and has created a  neo-feudalist system that is controlled by  multinational corporations. However, he's critical of movements that are not fighting against oppressive regimes, and is less likely to support those movements than he is to support the movements of people fighting for independence against authoritarian regimes.

[[File:Pan-Nationalism.png]] Pan-Nationalism [[File:Pan-Nationalism.png]]
Mattism encourages countries of similar cultures to integrate with each other in terms of co-operation, as they have the most to gain from international co-operation. These pan-nationalist movements have contributed to anti-imperialist ambitions, and should be used to resist the hegemonic powers of the East and the West through things like economic blocs and regional unions between the retrospective member states.

[[File:Internat.png]] Foreign Aid [[File:Internat.png]]
Mattism views foreign aid as a double edged sword. On one hand, when use rightly, it can actually helped underdeveloped countries in need and prevent the deaths of thousands of people through humanitarian aid. But, on the other, it can be used by corrupt officials to further their own wealth, while leaving very little of the population it was intended to be given too. But, in spite of all of this, he still has a rather favorable view of foreign aid, seeing as the United States has helped prevent the deaths of countless people through its foreign aid programs, he is very much in favor of increasing the amount of foreign aid given to countries. Seeing it as a tool that can be used to further positive relations with the US, and for peaceful diplomacy. So, that money that is given through foreign aid will pay itself back in international influence, which is critical for the foreign policy of the  United States on the international stage.

[[File:Strato.png]] The Military [[File:Strato.png]]
Mattism is in favor of defunding the national budget of the military, as it is way too bloated for the national security of our country. Along with the thousands of lives that are taken each year in conflicts we intervene in that only benefit the military industrial complex. But, the military should still receive adequate funding for the defense of our national security, as we still need to defend our allies and our international interests, but we can't go bossing other countries around just because we have the diplomatic weight to do so.

[[File:Isolation.png]] Non-Interventionism [[File:Isolation.png]]
Mattism rejects entangling our troops into other countries just for the sake of combatting the rise of authoritarian states and spreading "democracy". As, this leads to forever endless wars that waste billions of dollars in tax payer money just for the military industrial complex without any actual plans for nation building, which our government doesn't have a good track record with. And, while he holds no sympathies towards said authoritarian states, and would prefer for them to be overthrown and turn into liberal democracies, he is supportive of a  foreign policy. Believing that pacifism as a major power would be destructive and open a power vacuum for other more destructive countries to take hold of. We should abandon most of our military bases outside of our allies to save billions of dollars in tax payer money. Instead of focusing on wasting our resources in other countries, we should focus on our own domestic affairs. The only time military intervening in other countries is justifiable is if it is for humanitarian reasons, the backing of civil unrest groups in undemocratic countries, or if a country has attacked our allies. The presence of our military in the world has caused nothing but suffering for developing countries, and we cannot police the world in this aspect, and we should accept that.

International Organizations =

[[File:Necon.png]] NATO [[File:Necon.png]]
Mattism supports the continued existence of NATO as an alliance, as NATO is necessary for the defense of Europe. But, with this in mind, he doesn't like some aspects of the alliance. That mainly being, the alliance not requiring its members to maintain its democratic status, not being a purely defensive alliance, and NATO being too centric on the United States. He would've been in favor of abolishing the alliance for a collective security council, but seeing the way things are recently going with current events, the alliance has shown to still have a purpose, and he will still continue to support its existence. However, he would prefer this alliance to eventually be replaced for a collective security council and reduce the alliance to a purely defensive one, as NATO in its current form is too hegemonic and reliant on the Untied States. But, for as long as there are authoritarian dictatorships in the world that threaten the peace and stability within Europe and other regions related, some alliance uniting all of these countries against them will need to exist.

[[File:Cball-UN.png]] United Nations [[File:Cball-UN.png]]
Mattism believes that the United Nations doesn't really do a whole lot, but sees the organization as a useful tool for peaceful diplomacy. And, as such, is supportive of the United States to remain within the United Nations. But, he would reform the institutions of the United Nations to be more democratic and more representative of its members. As, the UN in its current states only represents the 5 big members. The organization should be used to further diplomatic means for things like environmentalism and humanitarianism to prevent the outbreak of war between countries and other disasters.

However, he is skeptical of using international organizations like the United Nations to further integrate world governments into federations. And, while not despising the concept of this, he sees it as largely impractical, and a tool of neoliberal globalists to further push their agenda. Although, if it was done under alternative globalist means, he wouldn't have a whole lot of an issue with it. Given, the process is entirely voluntary.

On it's agencies like the IMF, WTO, OECD, ect. Mattism opposes them. As, these organizations have indebted third world countries and contributed to economic exploitation of said countries by developed countries.

[[File:Cball-EU.png]] European Union [[File:Cball-EU.png]]
Mattism doesn't oppose the European Union as an idea, as the organization has done good things, like ensuring  peace between the member states,  carbon emission reducing measures, and its role in the protection of consumer goods and standards. However, he dislikes the austerity monetary policies used by the organization, along with the  free-trade agreements, seeing these as  neoliberal policies that cause wealth inequality to rise within Europe. So, he doesn't oppose EU membership itself, but opposes these specific policies of the organization, making him a. He doesn't support leaving the European Union because he realizes that it is economic suicide to do so, as can be seen during Brexit were the United Kingdom suffered a lot of issues relating to resources like oil and their workforce, in part due to the conservative leadership not having planned out Brexit properly, and the effects of Brexit that were going to hit the United Kingdom regardless if Brexit had been planned properly or not. He wants to democratize the institutions and give the member states greater control over policies like trade and immigration. He opposes the idea of a untied europe, seeing as it is largely impratical, and would either become undemocratic, or fall apart entirely due the massive amounts of disagreements within and between European governments. And, with this, he is supportive of the European Parliament in sanctioning authoritative governments that are faltering on having democracy like  Poland. As, the union should do everything in its legal authority to uphold human rights and democracy in the countries residing in it, as well, it should back democratic protestors in undemocratic countries like Belarus to undermine their regimes.

While he doesn't have a problem with immigration, as it is a good way to fix our demographic crisis, he dislikes what happened during the immigration crisis of 2015. Because, letting in that much immigrants at once for any country would cause immediate conflict, and caused the rise of said right-wing populists to take hold in Europe. So, he defends their more culturally conservative policies, as  they've shown to not assimilate well into the societies they are placed in, which only causes racism and hatred of foreigners to skyrocket. Although, he still disagrees with the hardline stances some of the member states have, believing that they turn away refugees and immigrants even when they could be of massive utility for the country just out of xenophobia. He believes there should be some liberalization of immigration so long as there are integration programs for the immigrants to assimilate into their societies retrospectively

Countries =

[[File:Cball-China.png]] China [[File:Cball-China.png]]
The CCP is a pseudo-fascist  totalitarian dictatorship that  doesn't respect human rights or civil liberties. And, is actively commiting the largest human rights abuse since the holocaust, which is not up for debate, cope and seethe 50 cent army retards. Along with having no respect for their own environment or workers rights. Mattism believes that, with all of this in mind, and a lot more, he thinks it's the best interest of the West to contain the influence of the CCP, and their evil practices from spreading. As, the Chinese government has shown to not care for the welfare of its people, and has proven the world time and time again that it is the biggest threat to world peace. The international community should work together to actively condemn China, and to stop their human rights abuses. As well, he would support a democratic uprising against the current Chinese government, similar to that of the Tiananmen Square protests. As, the CCP is not the legitimate ruling party of China. Not even the economic model of China redeems the country, as it's all built off of fraud and corrupt that feeds off of being addicted to debt to keep its system running, with previously stated not having any significant welfare systems or workers protections, it is an authoritarian capitalist state.

However, despite how bad China is and how satisfying it would be for the real China to take over the mainland, we can't just go in a dick-swinging contest with the CCP just because we can, as we need to maintain some level of mutual relationship with the CCP, while also condemning their actions. There are some areas we need to co-operate with the Chinese government on, such as environmental issues, as China is a major power that is contributing to global warming. We should be pursuing a policy of realpolitik with the CCP.

[[File:Cball-US.png]] United States [[File:Cball-US.png]]
Mattism is a patriotic ideology, and he likes the country he was born in obviously, as it's one he has managed to live a good life in compared to other authoritarian states. However, he still wants to greatly changed how the things are and US foreign policy The United States to stop meddling in the affairs of other countries, and start pursuing closer diplomatic ties with them to achieve world peace and internationally pressure countries like  China, as that will be more beneficial towards us as a nation on the geopolitical stage. With this, he also supports the idea of a Pan-American union between all of the countries on the American continent.

[[File:Cball-Taiwan.png]] Taiwan [[File:Cball-Taiwan.png]]
Mattism fully supports Taiwan over this dispute, and believes that the  Chinese government has no legitimate authority in claiming the Taiwanese island or messing with the national sovereignty of another country. Taiwan itself is the most based state in East Asia compared to its neighbors like Japan or South Korea, with it being the most progressive and an actual functioning democracy that respects human rights. He is also a staunch supporter of Taiwanese independence on the international stage, along with giving his full and critical support for the  Milk Tea Alliance, and the  Hong Kong Protesters. Along with this, he supports the United States in militarily defending  Taiwan if the  CCP ever launched a military invasion of the Island. As, we have to make it clear that the West is willing to stand up to authoritarian states in the world. Although, that probably would never happen anyways, as the Chinese government is a paper tiger that's all talk and no bite. Suck it, pseudo-fascist fifty cent army dengoids, Taiwan is a real country, cope and seethe.

[[File:Cball-Russia.png]] Russia [[File:Cball-Russia.png]]
Mattism believes that Russia's territorial expansions should, in absolutely zero way, be recognized. And, that all the lands stolen should be given back to their neighbors. And, he condemns the invasion of Ukraine, believing that this war must be a devastating defeat for  Putin. He supports the Russian opposition party to that of United Russia, being Russia of the Future. Along with this, he supports other opposition parties like the Russian United Democratic Party.

[[File:Cball-Ukraine.png]] Ukraine [[File:Cball-Ukraine.png]]
While Mattism obviously doesn't support Russia, as they are an oppressive  authoritarian conservative dictatorship, he also doesn't fully support  Ukraine either. As, both of our governments have common enemies that we should work together against, he also realizes that Ukraine suffers the same issues Russia does, as the government is an oligarchical state that doesn't care about worker rights, like a lot of post-soviet states. But, because Ukraine is fighting a defensive war imposed onto it by the Putin regime, he will support Ukraine against Russian expansion. With this, he would favor Ukrainian admission into NATO, as that's what has kept Eastern Europe from falling into chaos like Ukraine after Putin invaded and has kept peace in the region, but he doesn't take a stance on Ukrainian admission into the  European Union, and believes that should be left up for the people to decide themselves. As, he has his own issues with the organization.

[[File:Cball-Belarus.png]] Belarus [[File:Cball-Belarus.png]]
Mattism sides with the Belarusian opposition parties, believing that  Lukashenko's government is not the legitimate ruling party of Belarus. And, is supportive of Sviatlana Tsikhanouskaya. As, the Belarusian people deserve fair and free elections, and a legitimate government. Not some Putin backed puppet dictatorship that doesn't have the best interest of the people's minds at heart. With all of this, he supports Belarus in joining NATO, but believes that the decision to join the  European Union should be up to the people, and won't take any stance on it.

[[File:Cball-Hungary.png]] Hungary [[File:Cball-Hungary.png]]
Mattism is against the current ruling party of FIDESZ. As, it is slowly chipping away the remaining democracy Hungary has, and is a  Russian asset as well. He supports the sanctioning of Orban's government by the  European Union. As, Europe doesn't need any pointless infighting, and the current government of Hungary is destroying it's own country in the process. He supports the opposition coalition that oppose his government. And, would support a peaceful revolution by the opposition as well, as Hungary is in dire need of some political change to keep it from going down the destructive path it's going.

[[File:Cball-Iraq.png]] Iraq [[File:Cball-Iraq.png]]
Despite how bad Saddam Hussein was, the military invasion had no grounds for happening, wasted billions of tax payer dollars, completely failed at nation building and establishing a functioning  republic, and lead to the complete destabilization of the region which caused  ISIS to take control of the territory they did. He is against the invasion done by the neocons. He will support Rojava against  Ba'athists and  terrorists, ect.

[[File:Cball-Poland.png]] Poland [[File:Cball-Poland.png]]
The polish government needs to open up its government, stop its  corrupt, and destructive practices. He supports the opposition party to Law and Justice, being  Lewica. As, Poland doesn't need to go down the same fate  Hungary will go down if they don't stop. And, would support a peaceful revolution against the current Polish government by the opposition parties. So, I'm very much supportive of the European Parliament in sanctioning the current Polish government.

[[File:Cball-Greece.png]] Greece [[File:Cball-Greece.png]]
Mattism realizes that both the European Union and the  Greek government are at fault for the situation. As, the Greek government was corrupt as shit, and lied about its debt so it could get into the economic union. While, the Greek government was further indebted by bad loans given to it to try to bail it out. Overall, it is important that we help Greece out of their financial crisis, but oppose giving them any sort of bailouts.

[[File:Cball-Kosovo.png]] Kosovo [[File:Cball-Kosovo.png]]
Mattism supports Kosovo in their right to self-determination and independence. However, Kosovo would be better off integrating into  Albania, with the ethnic Serbian bits going to Serbia, and the rest going to Albania. As, it's very unlikely to get internationally recognized as an independent country, so that would be the second best outcome to achieve its independence from Serbia.

[[File:Cball-Syria.png]] Syria [[File:Cball-Syria.png]]
Mattism supports withdrawing most of our troops from Syria, and its related regions. We should focus on working together with other countries to defeat ISIS and other related terrorist groups in the region, as that should take priority first. Along with supporting the Kurdish rebels, as they deserve independence and the right to self-determination for everything they've been through in this conflict. Assad's regime must be opposed, as Assad has started this entire conflict, and is a corrupt and brutal dictator. Fighting the humanitarian crisis caused by the civil war and the displaced people's should also take priority as well, as the mass immigration of refugees from the Middle East has to stop.

[[File:Cball-Saudi.png]] Saudi Arabia [[File:Cball-Saudi.png]]
Mattism doesn't support allying ourselves with Saudi Arabia, a country with no records of human rights or political freedom. We shouldn't be cozying up to dictators who go against our own values because they have something to offer us, especially with what happened with the news reporters, funding terrorist groups, and stuff related to that.

[[File:Cball-Iran.png]] Iran [[File:Cball-Iran.png]]
Mattism supports the United States in working together with Iran were it is needed, like the  nuclear arms disarmament, but opposed in other Areas like their horrific human rights records. It is important that we maintain diplomatic relations with the Iranian government due to these reasons.

[[File:Cball-Afghanistan.png]] Afghanistan [[File:Cball-Afghanistan.png]]
While Mattism doesn't support the Taliban taking over Afghanistan, he supports the withdrawal of American troops from Afghanistan. Because, we were fighting an endless war we were never bound to win, that was costing us billions of dollars every year. We should've pulled out as soon as we got the guy we wanted. However, he doesn't support how president Biden withdrew troops from Afghanistan in the way that it happened. As, it wasn't carefully thought out, and we just ended up intervening in other places anyways. He would support a full withdrawal from these conflicts. Ideally, Afghanistan should have a democratic and  secular government to combat the Islamo fundies and other religious conflict in the region.

[[File:Cball-Yugoslavia.png]] Yugoslavia [[File:Cball-Yugoslavia.png]]
Mattism supports the military intervention in  Yugoslavia. As, it was a humanitarian intervention that was necessary to stop the ethnic genocide by  Serbian troops in  Kosovo.

[[File:Thailand.png]] Thailand [[File:Thailand.png]]
Mattism supports the anti-governmental protestors against the Thai monarchy. He believes the current government is not the legitimate government and hopes that the monarchy gets overthrown for a republic.

[[File:Cball-India.png]] India [[File:Cball-India.png]]
Mattism supports allying ourselves with India, but oppose Modi and other  radical hindu nationalists as well. As, the caste system in India's society has largely been shaped by the  religious influence in the country itself. India is an important player in world politics, and it is important to uphold democratic institutions within the country and  peace within the region.

[[File:Cball-Venezuela.png]] Venezuela [[File:Cball-Venezuela.png]]
Mattism doesn't support the current government of Venezuela, but also doesn't support the  United States meddling in the affairs of  Venezuela as well. We should try to amend the relations between our government and theirs while actively condemning the violence and everything else that has happened. Ideally, the rule of law and fair elections should be reestablished, and the current government should step down. He personally supports the opposition party towards the government Acción Democrática.

[[File:Cball-Libya.png]] Libya [[File:Cball-Libya.png]]
Mattism is against the intervention in Libya. Because, despite how bad Gaddafi was, it doesn't justify what the  neoconservatives did. As, going in and destabilizing the country further just replaced Gaddafi's regime with  terrorists groups.

[[File:Cball-North_Korea.png]] North Korea [[File:Cball-North_Korea.png]]
Mattism obviously doesn't like North Korea as a state, they are our foreign adversary. And, he considers the concept of Juche to have completely failed in its entirety, as it isn't even socialist in the modern day, just more closer to  state capitalism and  Third Positionism. So, North Korea is by most definitions, and failed state, and has no real right to exist on the geopolitical stage.

[[File:Cball-South_Korea.png]] South Korea [[File:Cball-South_Korea.png]]
Mattism would support South Korea in taking over  North Korea over this dispute, but that doesn't mean he support South Korea fully. As their society is his anti-thesis and rampant with corrupt oligarchical rule and is a late capitalist hell scape. So, South Korea as a government and as a society needs to greatly improve if they want his full unconditional support to take over the Korean Peninsula. But, given the choice next is a country that is a totalitarian hell hole which is a failed state with no respect for  human rights, he would choose the lesser evil in this instance.

[[File:Cball-Japan.png]] Japan [[File:Cball-Japan.png]]
Mattism, while liking a lot of the media that comes from this country, also realizes that its society and government are his anti-thesis in a lot of way. He is against the current Japanese government, as it is a lot of what he stands against. What Japan needs is a massive resurgence in labor unions to improve worker's rights in the country, among other left-wing reforms, as he realizes the working conditions in this country are far from good. The current party is just a neo-con imperialist party and is a one party dominant system, he supports the  social democratic party against the current ruling party. He will support Japan against forces like  China,  Russia, ect.

[[File:Castro.png]] Cuba [[File:Castro.png]]
Mattism, In spite of what he thinks of the Cuban government, thinks that the blockade against them is unjust, and should be lifted. However, the current government isn't some anti-imperialist baston either, it's just a brutal dictatorship that suppresses any personal rights of its citizens. And with this, he promptly sides with the cuban protesters. And, would support a revolution against the current Cuban government by the Cuban people, as they deserve a lot better than what they currently have. Not some authoritarian, corrupt, and brutal dictatorship. They deserve a democratic and fair government.

[[File:Zio.png]] Israel [[File:Zio.png]]
Mattism doesn't support Israel, their government needs to stop its brutal policies of neo-colonialism against the  Arabs. Along with dropping our international support for Israel, and stop giving them our tax paying dollars. As, the current government is strong enough on its own to fend for itself. But, he's not opposed to Israel existing as a state, as Israel has the right to self-determination, like all countries do. And, in all honesty, a part of him would prefer Israel over Palestine personally as it is a functioning western democracy that is secular with respect for western values, but ultimately refrains from taking a stand of being against or for Israel as Israel is an ethnostate that is committing crimes against humanity. He just wants to pull out of this region because It's not our fight to fight. We should be supporting Israel and Palestine together in peace deals that stabilize the region from further conflict.

[[File:Cball-Palestine.png]] Palestine [[File:Cball-Palestine.png]]
Mattism doesn't support Palestine, as their government needs to drop Hamas, and other terrorist organizations related to its government. As, the brutality shown by the Palestinian government is on par with that of Israeli government. As, he's not opposed to Palestine existing, but they need to drop their ethnic centrism down to  civic nationalism, like  Israel should. Ideally, both governments should collapse. And, in their place, a democratic government that is based on secular governance and  civic nationalism that is made for both Israelis and Palestinians. But, seeing as that's idealistic, he would support a two state solution with similar terms. As, Palestine should be allowed to peacefully co-exist with Israel, and have the right to self-determination.

Party lore
Sometime during the 1950's, there was infighting between new deal liberals and liberals who wanted to preserve the current status quo to an extent. Which caused the split of the democratic party to form the United Progressive Front. This party mainly persists of progressives, with some modern liberals who are more progressive than that of the more centrist democratic party. The faction with the most influence is the progressive liberal faction, with the socialist faction and the modern liberal faction having roughly the same amount of influence between them. There also consists a few subset of left-libertarians who range from social democrats to libertarian socialists. The party would end up being called the "United progressive front".

Progressive Liberal Caucus

 * [[File:Socdem.png]] Social Democracy
 * [[File:Socgeo.png]] Social Georgism
 * [[File:Leftpop-0.png]] Left-Wing Populism
 * [[File:Progress.png]] Progressivism
 * [[File:Globnat.png]] Alter-Globalization
 * [[File:Envi.png]] Environmentalism

Socialist Caucus

 * [[File:Marketsoc.png]] Market Socialism
 * [[File:Liberalsoc.png]] Liberal Socialism
 * [[File:Dsa.png]] Democratic Socialism
 * [[File:Leftpop-0.png]] Left-Wing Populism
 * [[File:Socgeo.png]] Social Georgism
 * [[File:Ecosoc.png]] Eco-Socialism

Modern Liberal Caucus

 * [[File:Soclib.png]] Social Liberalism
 * [[File:Soccap.png]] Social Capitalism
 * [[File:Neotech.png]] Technoliberalism
 * [[File:Glib.png]] Green Liberalism
 * [[File:Pop.png]] Populism
 * [[File:Progress.png]] Progressivism

Liberty Caucus

 * [[File:LibSocDemIcon.png]] Libertarian Social Democracy
 * [[File:Bhl2.png]] Bleeding-Heart Libertarianism
 * [[File:Civlibert.png]] Civil Libertarianism
 * [[File:Thar.png]] Anti-Authoritarianism
 * [[File:Leftpop-0.png]] Left-Wing Populism
 * [[File:Envi.png]] Environmentalism

Favorite quotes
“Anyone can deal with victory. Only the mighty can bear defeat.” - Adolf Hitler (He lost lmao)

“In twelve years from now, you will not recognize Berlin.” -  Adolf Hitler (He lost lmao)

"All you have to do is kick in the door and the whole rotten structure will crumble to the ground." - Adolf Hitler (He lost lmao)

“the harder the conflict, the greater the triumph.” - George Washington

“Being all equal and independent, no one ought to harm another in his life, health, liberty, or possessions.” - John Locke

"The love for all living creatures is the most noble attribute of man." - Charles Darwin

“Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the universe.” - Albert Einstein

“Peace cannot be kept by force, it can only be achieved by understanding.” - Albert Einstein

“If a free society cannot help the many who are poor, it cannot save the few who are rich." - John Kennedy

“Mankind must put an end to war - or war will put an end to mankind." -  John Kennedy

“If by a "Liberal" they mean someone who looks ahead and not behind, someone who welcomes new ideas without rigid reactions, someone who cares about the welfare of the people-their health, their housing, their schools, their jobs, their civil rights and their civil liberties-someone who believes we can break through the stalemate and suspicions that grip us in our policies abroad, if that is what they mean by a "Liberal", then I'm proud to say I'm a "Liberal.” -  John Kennedy

"People hate politicians. And I can understand why." - Alexei Navalny

"I am not in politics for power. I am in it for justice." - Sviatlana Tsikhanouskaya

"The world will not accept dictatorship or domination." - Mikhail Gorbachev

"Contemporary social democracy is what I believe is the right concept." - Mikhail Gorbachev

“Peace is not unity in similarity but unity in diversity, in the comparison and conciliation of differences.” - Mikhail Gorbachev

"I'm for the poor man - all poor men, black and white, they all gotta have a chance. They gotta have a home, a job, and a decent education for their children. 'Every man a king' - that's my slogan." - Huey Long

“Capitalism is the astounding belief that the most wickedest of men will do the most wickedest of things for the greatest good of everyone.” - John Maynard Keynes

“The difficulty lies, not in the new ideas, but in escaping from the old ones.” - John Maynard Keynes

"Although it is not true that all conservatives are stupid people, it is true that most stupid people are conservative." - John Stuart Mill

"All silencing of discussion is an assumption of infallibility." - John Stuart Mill

"Whatever crushes individuality is despotism, by whatever name it may be called and whether it professes to be enforcing the will of God or the injunctions of men." - John Stuart Mill

"Pleasure and freedom from pain, are the only things desirable as ends." - John Stuart Mill

"So Long as we do not harm others we should be free to think, speak, act, & live as we see fit, without molestation from individuals, law, or gov't."

- John Stuart Mill

“Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then he is not omnipotent. Is he able, but not willing? Then he is malevolent. Is he both able and willing? Then whence cometh evil? Is he neither able nor willing? Then why call him God?”

- Epicurus

“America will never be destroyed from the outside. If we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves.” - Abraham Lincoln

“Those who deny freedom to others, deserve it not for themselves” -  Abraham Lincoln

“As President Franklin Delano Roosevelt reminded us: “The test of our progress is not whether we add more to the abundance of those who have much, it is whether we provide enough for those who have little.” - Bernie Sanders

"All tyrannies rule through fraud and force, but once the fraud is exposed they must rely exclusively on force." - George Orwell

"However much you deny the truth, the truth goes on existing." - George Orwell

“When one thinks of all the people who support or have supported Fascism, one stands amazed at their diversity. What a crew! Think of a programme which at any rate for a while could bring Hitler, Petain, Montagu Norman, Pavelitch, William Randolph Hearst, Streicher, Buchman, Ezra Pound, Juan March, Cocteau, Thyssen, Father Coughlin, the Mufti of Jerusalem, Arnold Lunn, Antonescu, Spengler, Beverley Nichols, Lady Houston, and Marinetti all into the same boat! But the clue is really very simple. They are all people with something to lose, or people who long for a hierarchical society and dread the prospect of a world of free and equal human beings. Behind all the ballyhoo that is talked about ‘godless’ Russia and the ‘materialism’ of the working class lies the simple intention of those with money or privileges to cling to them. Ditto, though it contains a partial truth, with all the talk about the worthlessness of social reconstruction not accompanied by a ‘change of heart’. The pious ones, from the Pope to the yogis of California, are great on the’ change of heart’, much more reassuring from their point of view than a change in the economic system.” - George Orwell

“The only thing we have to fear is fear itself.” - Franklin Roosevelt

“The liberty of a democracy is not safe if the people tolerated the growth of private power to a point where it becomes stronger than the democratic state itself. That in its essence is fascism: ownership of government by an individual, by a group, or any controlling private power.” - Franklin Roosevelt

“Democracy cannot succeed unless those who express their choice are prepared to choose wisely. The real safeguard of democracy, therefore, is education.” - Franklin Roosevelt

“In our hands is a placed power greater with their hoarded gold, greater than the might of armies magnified a thousand-fold. We can bring the birth the new world from the ashes of the old, for the union makes us strong.”

- Ralph Chaplin

“Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere.” - Martin Luther King Jr.

“We must live together as brothers or perish together as fools.” - Martin Luther King Jr.

“I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin but by the content of their character.” - Martin Luther King Jr.

"Ultimately, saying that you don't care about privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different from saying you don't care about freedom of speech because you have nothing to say." - Edward Snowden

“These programs were never about terrorism: they're about economic spying, social control, and diplomatic manipulation. They're about power.” - Edward Snowden

“Under observation, we act less free, which means we effectively are less free.” - Edward Snowden

"The true white man lives in his basement, jerks off to anime porn, and reads my books"

- Julius Evola

"We long to have a home where civil freedoms are respected, where our children will not be subject to mass surveillance, abuse of human rights, political censorship and mass incarceration." - Joshua Wong

"No country is free unless it is democratic." - Kemal Atatürk

User Relationship Quiz
WIP (This is going through a complete rework, please don't touch until I'm done) This quiz is to gauge how much you are in agreement with my ideology, you will earn points the more you agree with my ideological stances. Economic Societal Issues Governance Foreign
 * 1. I support a tightly regulated capitalist economy with central planning/corporatism +1
 * I support some regulations in a capitalist framework/socialism with a free market +0.5
 * I am anti-economics/support a free market economy/communism or other utopic forms of economics +0
 * 2. Banks should be public but not nationalized +1
 * Banks should be nationalized by the government +0.5
 * The central bank should be replaced with some alternative +0
 * 3. I support land reform and getting rid of both rent and landlords +1
 * I support LVT and landlords/widespread ownership of land +0.5
 * I support propertarianism +0
 * 4. Healthcare should be free and universal +1
 * Healthcare should be multi-payer, but not free +0.5
 * Healthcare is not a human right that should be afforded by the government +0
 * 5. Billionaires should be allowed to exist, but should pay their fair share in taxes and not offshore their wealth. Along with there should be a hard wealth cap. The same thing said applies to millionaires +1
 * Billionaires shouldn't exist, but millionaires can +0.5
 * It's their money, they should be able to use it how they want to/all wealth should be equally redistributed equally +0
 * 6. I support fair markets and believe in the creation of new anti-trust laws to fit the modern day to combat monopolies +1
 * Monopolies should be broken up but new anti-trust laws aren't necessary and the government shouldn't favor small businesses over big businesses +0.5
 * Monopolies should never be broken up because the free market will solve our problems/corporations shouldn't exist at all +0
 * 7. I support a progressive tax system 1+
 * I support a flat tax system 0.5
 * I support no taxation or a regressive tax system
 * 8. The welfare state should be expanded to provide for people's basic needs, and be universal +1
 * A small/medium sized welfare state should exist, but I'm against universal welfare +0.5
 * I support some alternative to welfare/the welfare state should only be given to the most dependable people in society/I'm against welfare at all +0
 * 9. The workforce should have strong presence of unionization to fight for workers rights +1
 * Unions should exist, but I prefer guilds/unions are bad more than they are good/Unions should be used to transition into socialism +0.5
 * I'm anti-union +0
 * 10. Corporate welfare should be ended for large businesses as if a business is too big to fail it is too big to exist +1
 * Corporate welfare shouldn't be given to big business, but we also shouldn't subsidize other forms of industry as well +0.5
 * Corporate welfare should be used to bail out big businesses +0
 * 1. Social progressivism is based and necessary for the progression of humanity +1
 * I am a cultural left-leaning centrist +0.5
 * I am socially conservative/leaning conservative +0
 * 2. Pornography and Prostitution should both be legalized because one has the right to use their body how they please +1
 * Pornography should be allowed but not prostitution +0.5
 * Both porn and prostitution should be banned +0
 * 3. LGBT Rights should be protected and It's wrong to discriminate against people for their sexuality even if there's some elements of pride I disagree with +1
 * They can have their rights, but I'm against pride culture. +0.5
 * The LGBT community should have their rights reversed back to civil unions/shouldn't have full marriage rights/should be actively persecuted. +0
 * 4.I support individualism in terms of community +1
 * I am mildly individualist 0.5+
 * I support communitarianism/mass collectivism/mass individualism 0+
 * 5.I am a civil libertarian +1
 * I am a civil moderate + 0.5
 * I am a civil authoritarian 0+
 * 6. Abortion is a form of healthcare and reproductive rights should be protected +1
 * Abortion should be allowed for only the first month + 0.5
 * Abortion shouldn't be allowed in any case 0+
 * 7. I support feminism and believe both sexes are equal +1
 * I support some feminist talking points, but gender roles should be kept to a certain degree 0.5+
 * I support strict gender roles/oppose gender equality 0+
 * 8. Trans people should be allowed to change their gender and transition +1
 * Trans people should be allowed to transition, but I support transmedicalism 0.5+
 * There is no such thing as being trans and I oppose any sort of trans rights 0+
 * 9. I support interculturalism, and believe that cultures should engage in cross-cultural dialogue. +1
 * I support monoculturalism and believe that immigrants should have to assimilate//I support multiculturalism but with secure borders 0.5+
 * I support strict nativism/open borders 0+
 * 10. Freedom of speech and expression is necessary for any society +1
 * Some form of expression should be restricted like hate speech/obscenity 0.5+
 * Freedom of speech isn't necessary for a society 0+
 * 1. I support a Liberal Democracy +1
 * I support some of other form of governance that isn't anti-democratic 0.5+
 * I am anti-democratic (This includes anything that is an authoritarian "democracy" that doesn't allow free and fair elections) 0+
 * 2. Political parties should exist, but there should be reform that allows the inclusion of more political parties to compete in elections. +1
 * I am against political parties entirely +0.5
 * I support a one-party state/political parties have no obligation to serve the interest of their voter base
 * 3. While representatives should exist, the people should be allowed greater autonomy through polls/referendums, ect. As, representatives don't always have the best interest of the people at heart +1
 * Representatives are good enough/I support issues being directly voted on by the population +0.5
 * I am against political representatives entirely +0
 * 4. I support a secular state and believe that the government policies should be based on secularism +1
 * I support Laicism +0.5
 * I support some form of religious governance whether it be a religious democracy or theocracy/forced secularism +0
 * 5. I support populism. Specifically, left-wing populism +1
 * I am a populist without objectives +0.5
 * I am a neo-nationalist or against populism +0
 * 1. While bloc politics aren't perfect, I realize Western civilization has contributed more to the world compared to other civilizations, and will support western powers to counter the states of the east +1
 * Both the east and west are equally bad + 0.5
 * I am sympathetic to powers of the east such as China, Russia, or the former, and believe they are less destructive +0
 * 2. NATO as an alliance is necessary in the modern day +1
 * NATO should be disbanded and replaced with a collective security council +0.5
 * I am against NATO and any form of defensive alliance hard stop +0
 * 3. The European Union is in desperate need of reform if it wants to survive in the modern times, and I am a soft-eurosceptic +1
 * The European Union is good as is +0.5
 * I support leaving the EU/I support European Federalism +0
 * 4. I am a diplomatic internationalist, and believe we as a world need to collectively work together for the greater good of humanity +1
 * I am neither for or against international co-operation +0.5
 * I am a diplomatic isolationist +0
 * 5. I support fair-trade with low tariffs and easy way for investors to enter the country for economic development, and believe the world should work together in terms of economics +1
 * I support high tariffs, but not against economic co-operation with other countries +0.5
 * I am against economic co-operation with other countries and support autarky/free trade +0
 * 6. I am a cosmopolitan/non-chauvinist nationalist and am both a citizen of the world and my nation +1
 * I am a cosmopolitan and a citizen of the world +0.5
 * I am a citizen of my nation only +0
 * 7. I am for a non-interventionist foreign policy and believe we should almost never military intervene in other countries unless we have to for the sake of national security, genocide and humanitarian aid, ect. +1
 * I support a pacifist foreign policy but we still intervene in genocidal states and partake in humanitarian aid +0.5
 * My country shouldn't even intervene in the most genocidal states/I am a military intervening in other countries +0
 * 8. I support being a member of the United Nations, but the institutions themselves are in need of reform +1
 * The UN is good as it is now/We should involve ourselves less in the UN but not leave it/I don't care about the UN +0.5
 * The UN is a failed project and we should leave it/ The UN should be used to further integrate world governments +0
 * 9. I support military alliances overall and we should actively seek to create them with other countries +1
 * I'm not against military alliances but we shouldn't actively seek to create them unless we need to +0.5
 * I'm against military alliances +0
 * 10. The world should work together in terms of environmentalism to defeat climate change +1
 * I support environmentalism, but I'm neutral over environmental globalization +0.5
 * I'm against environmental globalization/I don't support the development of environmental technology/I support the destruction of the environment/Climate change doesn't exist +0

User Results

 * - 25/25
 * - 21.5/25
 * - 20.5/25
 * - 20/25

How I would've voted in elections
American Elections =

1700s
1789 - George Washington

1792 - Thomas Jefferson

1796 - Thomas Jefferson

1800s
1800 - Thomas Jefferson

1804 - Thomas Jefferson

1808 - James Madison

1812 - James Madison

1816 - James Monroe

1820 - James Monroe

1824 - Andrew Jackson

1828 - Andrew Jackson

1832 - Andrew Jackson

1836 - Martin Van Buren

1840 - Martin Van Buren

1844 - James K. Polk

1848 -  Martin Van Buren

1852 - John P. Hale

1856 - John C. Frémont

1860 - Abraham Lincoln

1864 - Abraham Lincoln

1868 - Ulysses S. Grant

1872 - Horace Greeley

1876 - Rutherford B. Hayes

1880 - James A. Garfield

1884 - James G. Blaine

1888 - Benjamin Harrison

1892 - James B. Weaver

1896 - William McKinley

1900s
1900 - Theodore Roosevelt

1904 - Theodore Roosevelt

1908 - William Howard Taft

1912 - William Howard Taft

1916 - Charles Evans Hughes

1920 - James M. Cox

1924 - Calvin Coolidge

1928 - Herbert Hoover

1932 - Herbert Hoover

1936 - Franklin D. Roosevelt

1940 - Franklin D. Roosevelt

1944 - Franklin D. Roosevelt

1948 - Harry Truman

1952 - Adlai Stevenson

1956 - Adlai Stevenson

1960 - John F. Kennedy

1964 - Lyndon B. Johnson

1968 - Hubert Humphrey

1972 - George McGovern

1976 - Jimmy Carter

1980 - Jimmy Carter

1984 - Walter Mondale

1988 - Michael Dukakis

1992 - Bill Clinton

1996 - Bill Clinton

2000s
2000: Al Gore

2004: John Kerry

2008: Barrack Obama

2012: Barrack Obama

2016: Bernie Sanders (No one)

2020: Bernie Sanders ( Joe Biden) German Elections =

1800s
1871 - - LGGWA 1874 - - SAPD 1877 - - SAPD 1878 - - SAPD 1881 - - SAPD 1884 - - SAPD 1887 - - SAPD 1890 - - SPD 1893 - - SPD 1898 - - SPD

1900s
1901 - - SPD 1907 - - SPD 1912 - - SPD 1919 - - SDP 1920 - - SDP 1924 (May) - - SDP 1924 (December) - -  SDP 1928 - - SPD 1930 - - SPD 1932 (July) - - SPD 1932 (November) - - SPD 1933 (March) - - SPD 1947 - - SPD 1953 - - SPD 1957 - - SPD 1961 - - SPD 1965 - - SPD 1969 - - SPD 1972 - - SPD 1976 - - SPD 1980 - - SPD 1983 - - SPD 1987 - - SPD 1990 - - SPD 1994 - - SPD 1998 - - SPD

2000s
2002 - - SPD 2005 - - SPD 2007 - - SPD 2009 - - SPD 2013 - - SPD 2017 - - SPD 2021 - - SPD

Things I like
My favorite youtube channels =

[[File:YouTube.png]] Political Youtube channels [[File:YouTube.png]]

 * [[File:Soc-h.png]] Shaun


 * [[File:Socdem.png]] Shoe0nHead


 * [[File:Kraut.png]] Kraut


 * [[File:Thar.png]] Three Arrows


 * [[File:Fem.png]] Knowing Better


 * [[File:Antcent.png]] JrEg


 * [[File:World.png]] CaspianReport

[[File:YouTube.png]] Non-political Youtube channels [[File:YouTube.png]]

 * [[File:CGP_Grey.png]] CGP Grey


 * [[File:Eastoryball.png]] Eastory


 * [[File:CodyFrank.png]] AlternateHistoryHub


 * [[File:ArmchairHistoryBall.png]] The Armchair Historian


 * [[File:Cball-Russia.png]] NFKRZ


 * [[File:ISPball.png]] iSorrowproductions


 * [[File:Gamer.png]] Mountain General


 * [[File:Gamer.png]] Alex The Rambler!


 * [[File:Histval.png]] History Matters


 * [[File:Cball-Austria.png]] Tapakapa

Favorite Hoi4 Mods =
 * [[File:Histval.png]] Countryballs Explained

Favorite Hoi4 Mods

 * [[File:World.png]] Toolpack


 * [[File:Burgsys_icon.png]] The New Order: Last Days of Europe


 * [[File:Necon.png]] Cold War Iron Curtain: A World Divided


 * [[File:Avant-garde.png]] Red Flood


 * [[File:World.png]] Random Country Placement


 * [[File:World.png]] Novum Vexillum


 * [[File:Cball-GermanEmpire.png]] Kaiserredux


 * [[File:World.png]] Player-Led Peace Conferences


 * [[File:Nazi.png]] Thousand Week Reich

Rating Cities
City Relations =

Good

 * [[File:Cball-US.png]] Kansas City, Missouri - I've lived here the majority of my life, and while I do go in and out of the city often, I will still always cherish this city.
 * [[File:Cball-US.png]] St. Joseph, Missouri - I have family here, so I visit this city often. The city in of itself is bust however, as there's not a lot of activities to do here, and has a notable amount of homeless and gun violence from what I've seen. But, I've never had a notably bad experience from visiting this city. So, despite all of that, because I go here often, it gets put here.
 * [[File:Cball-US.png]] Lee's Summit, Missouri - I have had notably good experiences visiting here, as I can recall several of them.
 * [[File:Cball-US.png]] St. Louis, Missouri - Had a really fun time going on the arch. However, the city itself is in pretty dire shape from what I've seen, with having one of the highest crimes rates in the city. The city itself is pretty crud, but I did have a good experience going here where I went.
 * [[File:Cball-US.png]] San Francisco, California - Despite everything that goes on in California and this city, it was a pretty fun experience from what I had visiting it, and I would definitely go again.

Meh

 * [[File:Cball-US.png]] Denver, Colorado - I've been here several times, but it was never really interesting or boring, can't really recall a whole lot from the trips I've been to going to this city.
 * [[File:Cball-US.png]] Independence, Missouri - Nothing of note worthy ever happened here. But, I did visit it, so that's something, I guess. I would say it was ok.

Bad
Cities I would like to do go =
 * [[File:Cball-US.png]] Platte City, Missouri - One of my family members got mugged here lmao. While nothing of value was stolen (I think it was just like 50$ I dunno), that experience just ruined it entirely for me.

Europe

 * [[File:Cball-Russia.png]] Moscow, Russia
 * [[File:Cball-Russia.png]] Saint Petersburg, Russia
 * [[File:Cball-UK.png]] London, Britain
 * [[File:Cball-France.png]] Paris, France

Asia

 * [[File:Cball-Japan.png]] Tokyo, Japan
 * [[File:Cball-China.png]] Beijing, China
 * [[File:Cball-China.png]] Shanghai, China
 * [[File:Cball-China.png]] Hong Kong, China
 * [[File:Cball-Taiwan.png]] Taipei, Taiwan

Americas

 * [[File:Cball-Canada.png]] Toronto, Canada
 * [[File:Cball-Canada.png]] Vancouver, Canada
 * [[File:Cball-US.png]] New York, United States

Political Parties & Countries
Parties I would vote for = ==== (Note: Just because I would vote for these parties doesn't mean I agree with everything they espouse, they just happen to have the most ideological overlap with my beliefs, and some of these parties are banned parties) ====

[[File:Cball-US.png]] United States
Democratic Party
 * [[File:Dem-CPC.png]] Congressional Progressive Caucus

[[File:Cball-Germany.png]] Germany
SPD

[[File:Cball-Mexico.png]] Mexico
Partido de la Revolución Democrática

[[File:Polandball.png]] Poland
Lewica

[[File:Cball-Venezuela.png]] Venezuela
Alianza Democrática
 * [[File:Socdem.png]] Acción Democrática

[[File:Cball-Hungary.png]] Hungary
Magyar Szocialista Párt

[[File:Cball-France.png]] France
Parti socialiste

[[File:Cball-Japan.png]] Japan
Social Democratic Party of Japan

[[File:Cball-Sweden.png]] Sweden
Sveriges Socialdemokratiska Arbetareparti

[[File:Cball-Taiwan.png]] Republic of China
Pan-Green Coalition

[[File:Cball-UK.png]] United Kingdom
Labour Party
 * [[File:Onenatlab.png]] One Nation Labour

[[File:Cball-Kazakhstan.png]] Kazakhstan
Democratic Choice of Kazakhstan

[[File:Cball-Norway.png]] Norway
Arbeidarpartiet

[[File:Cball-Finland.png]] Finland
Suomen sosialidemokraattinen puolue

[[File:Cball-North_Korea.png]] North Korea
Free Joseon

[[File:Castro.png]] Cuba
Social Democratic Co-ordination of Cuba

[[File:Cball-South_Korea.png]] South Korea
Justice Party

[[File:Cball-HongKong.png]] Hong Kong
Pro-Democracy Camp
 * [[File:Socdem.png]] League of Social Democrats

[[File:Cball-China.png]] People's Republic of China
Democracy Party of China

[[File:Cball-Canada.png]] Canada
New Democratic Party

[[File:Cball-Russia.png]] Russia
Russia of the Future

[[File:Cball-Belarus.png]] Belarus
Anti-Lukashenko Parties
 * [[File:Socdem.png]] Belarusian Social Democratic Party

[[File:ROT.png]] Turkey
Republican People's Party Countries in need of change =

Countries will be ranked on their status, and the format goes like this: (Political structure, Economic Structure, and Social structure) ranging from these icons (NOTE, THIS IS A WIP)
//////

Based countries, little to no changes necessary

 * [[File:Cball-Denmark.png]] Denmark ([[File:Mega_Yes-icon.png]]/[[File:Mega_Yes-icon.png]]/[[File:Mega_Yes-icon.png]])
 * [[File:Cball-Sweden.png]] Sweden ([[File:Mega_Yes-icon.png]]/[[File:Mega_Yes-icon.png]]/[[File:Mega_Yes-icon.png]])
 * [[File:Cball-Norway.png]] Norway ([[File:Mega_Yes-icon.png]]/[[File:Mega_Yes-icon.png]]/[[File:Mega_Yes-icon.png]])
 * [[File:Cball-Iceland.png]] Iceland ([[File:Mega_Yes-icon.png]]/[[File:Mega_Yes-icon.png]]/[[File:Mega_Yes-icon.png]])
 * [[File:Cball-Finland.png]] Finland ([[File:Mega_Yes-icon.png]]/[[File:Mega_Yes-icon.png]]/[[File:Mega_Yes-icon.png]])
 * [[File:Cball-Switzerland.png]] Switzerland ([[File:Mega_Yes-icon.png]]/[[File:Kinda Yes-icon.png]]/[[File:Mega_Yes-icon.png]])
 * [[File:Cball-Austria.png]] Austria ([[File:Mega_Yes-icon.png]]/[[File:Mega_Yes-icon.png]]/[[File:Mega_Yes-icon.png]])
 * [[File:Cball-Germany.png]] Germany ([[File:Mega_Yes-icon.png]]/[[File:Mega_Yes-icon.png]]/[[File:Mega_Yes-icon.png]])
 * [[File:Cball-Netherlands.png]] Netherlands ([[File:Mega_Yes-icon.png]]/[[File:Mega_Yes-icon.png]]/[[File:Mega_Yes-icon.png]])
 * [[File:Cball-Canada.png]] Canada ([[File:Kinda Yes-icon.png]]/[[File:Kinda Yes-icon.png]]/[[File:Mega_Yes-icon.png]])
 * [[File:Cball-Belgium.png]] Belgium ([[File:Mega_Yes-icon.png]]/[[File:Mega_Yes-icon.png]]/[[File:Mega_Yes-icon.png]])
 * [[File:Cball-Czechia.png]] Czechia ([[File:Mega_Yes-icon.png]]/[[File:Yes-icon.png]]/[[File:Mega_Yes-icon.png]])
 * [[File:Cball-Ireland.png]] Ireland ([[File:Mega_Yes-icon.png]]/[[File:Mega_Yes-icon.png]]/[[File:Mega_Yes-icon.png]])
 * [[File:Cball-France.png]] France ([[File:Mega_Yes-icon.png]]/[[File:Mega_Yes-icon.png]]/[[File:Mega_Yes-icon.png]])
 * [[File:Cball-Spain.png]] Spain ([[File:Kinda Yes-icon.png]]/[[File:Mega_Yes-icon.png]]/[[File:Mega_Yes-icon.png]])

Good, in need of a few tweaks

 * [[File:Cball-Newz.png]] New Zealand
 * [[File:Cball-Uruguay.png]] Uruguay ([[File:Mega_Yes-icon.png]]/[[File:Kinda Yes-icon.png]]/[[File:Mega_Yes-icon.png]])
 * [[File:Cball-Australia.png]] Australia
 * [[File:Cball-Taiwan.png]] Taiwan ([[File:Yes-icon.png]]/[[File:Kinda Yes-icon.png]]/[[File:Mega_Yes-icon.png]])

Ok, but in need of reform

 * [[File:Cball-US.png]] United States ([[File:Kinda No-icon.png]]/[[File:Kinda No-icon.png]]/[[File:Yes-icon.png]])
 * [[File:Cball-Chile.png]] Chile
 * [[File:Cball-UK.png]] United Kingdom ([[File:Kinda No-icon.png]]/[[File:Kinda Yes-icon.png]]/[[File:Yes-icon.png]])

Bad, in need of noticeable reform

 * [[File:Cball-Japan.png]] Japan ([[File:No-icon.png]]/[[File:Kinda No-icon.png]]/[[File:No-icon.png]])
 * [[File:Cball-South_Korea.png]] South Korea ([[File:No-icon.png]]/[[File:Kinda No-icon.png]]/[[File:No-icon.png]])
 * [[File:Cball-Ukraine.png]] Ukraine ([[File:No-icon.png]]/[[File:No-icon.png]]/[[File:No-icon.png]])
 * [[File:Cball-Poland.png]] Poland ([[File:No-icon.png]]/[[File:Yes-icon.png]]/[[File:No-icon.png]])
 * [[File:Cball-Hungary.png]] Hungary ([[File:No-icon.png]]/[[File:Kinda No-icon.png]]/[[File:No-icon.png]])
 * [[File:Cball-Italy.png]] Italy ([[File:No-icon.png]]/[[File:No-icon.png]]/[[File:No-icon.png]])
 * [[File:Cball-Singapore.png]] Singapore ([[File:No-icon.png]]/[[File:Yes-icon.png]]/[[File:No-icon.png]])
 * [[File:Cball-Mexico.png]] Mexico ([[File:No-icon.png]]/[[File:No-icon.png]]/[[File:No-icon.png]])

Terrible, burn the entire system to the ground and start from new

 * [[File:Cball-Russia.png]] Russia ([[File:Mega No-icon.png]]/[[File:Mega No-icon.png]]/[[File:Mega No-icon.png]])
 * [[File:Cball-North_Korea.png]] North Korea ([[File:Mega No-icon.png]]/[[File:Mega No-icon.png]]/[[File:Mega No-icon.png]])
 * [[File:Zio.png]] Israel ([[File:Mega No-icon.png]]/[[File:Kinda No-icon.png]]/[[File:Yes-icon.png]])
 * [[File:Cball-Palestine.png]] Palestine ([[File:Mega No-icon.png]]/[[File:Mega No-icon.png]]/[[File:Mega No-icon.png]])
 * [[File:Cball-Iran.png]] Iran ([[File:Mega No-icon.png]]/[[File:Mega No-icon.png]]/[[File:Mega No-icon.png]])
 * [[File:Cball-Brazil.png]] Brazil ([[File:No-icon.png]]/[[File:Mega No-icon.png]]/[[File:Mega No-icon.png]])
 * [[File:Cball-Belarus.png]] Belarus ([[File:Mega No-icon.png]]/[[File:Yes-icon.png]]/[[File:Mega No-icon.png]])
 * [[File:Cball-China.png]] People's Republic of China ([[File:Mega No-icon.png]]/[[File:Mega No-icon.png]]/[[File:Mega No-icon.png]])
 * [[File:Cball-Taliban.png]] Afghanistan ([[File:Mega No-icon.png]]/[[File:Mega No-icon.png]]/[[File:Mega No-icon.png]])
 * [[File:Castro.png]] Cuba ([[File:Mega No-icon.png]]/[[File:Kinda No-icon.png]]/[[File:No-icon.png]])
 * [[File:Cball-Saudi.png]] Saudi Arabia ([[File:Mega No-icon.png]]/[[File:Mega No-icon.png]]/[[File:Mega No-icon.png]])
 * [[File:Chavismo.png]] Venezuela
 * [[File:ROT.png]] Turkey ([[File:No-icon.png]]/[[File:Kinda No-icon.png]]/[[File:Mega No-icon.png]])
 * [[File:Cball-Kazakhstan.png]] Kazakhstan ([[File:Mega No-icon.png]]/[[File:Mega No-icon.png]]/[[File:Mega No-icon.png]])
 * [[File:Cball-AfricanUnion.png]] A lot of Africa
 * [[File:Thailand.png]] Thailand
 * [[File:Cball-Turkmenistan.png]] Turkmenistan ([[File:Mega No-icon.png]]/[[File:Mega No-icon.png]]/[[File:Mega No-icon.png]])
 * [[File:Cball-Ethiopia.png]] Ethiopia
 * [[File:Cball-Somalia.png]] Somalia
 * [[File:Cball-Egypt.png]] Egypt
 * [[File:Cball-Myanmar.png]] Myammar

Positive

 * [[File:NDP icon.png]] New Democratic Party - Pretty typical socdem party, so you know what I'm about to say right now, A B S O L U T E L Y B A S E D!
 * [[File:USA_PirateParty.png]] United States Pirate Party - Absolutely based, and chad. Like, how is it even this possible to each this level of based?
 * [[File:Dem-CPC.png]] Congressional Progressive Caucus - One of the truly based parties in the United States, It's ashamed the establishment actively works against your causes. However, focuses a lot on this meaningless culture war a bit too much, which is understandable, but still. Outside of that, you're basically based.
 * [[File:ForwardParty.png]] American Forward Party - Well I may have disagreements, I still respect you as a political party. Yang is kinda meh however.

Neutral

 * [[File:Demcr.png]] Democratic Party - I seriously cannot believe I have to work with this party. The only tolerable faction within this party is the progressive caucus. All other wings are moderately to severely cringe. With having most of the criticisms I have for the republican party.
 * [[File:GreensUS.png]] Green Party USA - I honestly don't know much about your party or its members, but you seem to be slightly more tolerable. Although, full out socialism is not desirable, and your social policies are too far left.

Negative

 * [[File:RepubUS.png]] Republican Party - Fuck off, just because I hate the establishment doesn't mean I like you. You are my anti-thesis. Corporate welfare, ever increasing statism with disregard for civil liberties, foreign interventionism, isolationism, and free-market capitalism. Everything, and I mean EVERYTHING, is just awful.
 * [[File:USASolidarity.png]] American Solidarity Party - Based economic progressivism and some social policies, but pretty much everything else ruins it. Would be better if this party replaced the republican party, but even then it would still be pretty bad. Overall, next to no redeeming qualities of this dumpster fire you call a political party.
 * [[File:USLibertarians.png]] Libertarian Party - Based social views, but that's pretty much it. Pretty much nothing good, and many of you guys are just republicans who want to do drugs. You would single handedly crash the US economy if you ever got into power.
 * [[File:Dsa.png]] Democratic Socialists of America - This party is filled to the brim with Anti-American tankies. And, I'm not even advocating for socialism to begin with. Overall cringe.
 * [[File:Fuente.png]] America First - Nick Fuentes is a Neo-Nazi, and, funnily enough, is not even white.
 * [[File:Rockwell.png]] American Nazi Party - Neo-Nazis are absolute clowns.
 * [[File:Constitution_Party_(US).png]] Constitution Party - Unhinged social conservatism and fiscal conservatism, literally my political opposite.
 * [[File:Castro.png]] Communist Party of Cuba - Any American that supports you is a complete lolcow, have fun living in a country that doesn't respect human rights compared to the United States.

Positive

 * [[File:Nordmodel.png]] Sveriges Socialdemokratiska Arbetareparti - Thanks for being one the main inspirations! And, the ideology is pretty based.
 * [[File:Lewica.png]] Lewica - Not the best, but better than the current Polish government.

Neutral

 * [[File:UKLab.png]] Labour Party - The soft left is good, every other faction basically sucks.
 * [[File:Demsocstar.png]] Die Linke - Based left-wing populist and opposition towards the EU's neoliberal policies, everything else here isn't good though. And, from what I've read, you have pretty unrealistic fiscal policies as well.

Negative

 * [[File:Wagenknecht.png]] Aufstehen - Take anything remotely good about Die Linke, remove it, and you get this. Russophilic party that is socially conservative, lmao. Basically, standard old leftist.

Positive

 * [[File:Socdem.png]] Social Democratic Party of Japan - The best party Japanese politics has to offer. And, pretty based as well.
 * [[File:Synclib.png]] Constitutional Democratic Party of Japan - A bit moderate, but ehh... Preferable to the LDP.
 * [[File:PanGreenTW.png]] Pan-Green Coalition - Keep standing up for Taiwanese independence, full and critical support goes to you!
 * [[File:JusticeParty.png]] Justice Party - Pretty based for South Korea, shame left-wing politics aren't too popular there.
 * [[File:Cball-HongKong-BlackBauhinia.png]] Pro-Democracy Camp - I will wholeheartedly support you against the CCP.
 * [[File:Liberal Democracy.png]] Democracy Party of China - Imagine if the protestors succeeded... What only could've been. Shame brainwashed 50 cent army retards keep twisting the facts and sucking the dick of the Chinese Communist Party.
 * [[File:Socdem.png]] Belarusian Social Democratic Party - Lukashenko is a corrupt dictator and Putin puppet, keep protesting!
 * [[File:RussiaOfTheFuture.png]] Russia of the Future - Keep exposing the truth about Russia United, I have faith you can overthrow the Russian government!

Neutral

 * [[File:JapCom.png]] Japanese Communist Party - Social progressivism is cool, everything else is cringe. It does surprise me how Japan has such an active socialist party in their politics given their politics of the country though.

Negative

 * [[File:LDP(Japan).png]] Liberal Democratic Party of Japan - Neocon dick sucking neo-imperialist party.
 * [[File:PeoplePowerParty.png]] People's Power Party -
 * [[File:Dengf.png]] Chinese Communist Party - The amount of leftists who support you just because you oppose atlanticism is astounding, and aren't actually leftists if they do.
 * [[File:NeoShowa.png]] Nippon Kaigi - Neo-nazi cult, do I need to say more?

How to Draw
MyFlagUpdatedMatt.png
 * 1) Draw a ball.
 * 2) Fill the backround with blue.
 * 3) Draw a red cross with white outlines.
 * 4) Draw a red circle in the middle.
 * 5) Draw a rose in the middle of the red circle.
 * 6) Draw the eyes.

You're done!

Ideological Relations
Ideological Relations=

Based

 * [[File:Socdem.png]] Social Democracy - My ideology, fairly self explanatory, yeah?


 * [[File:LibSocDemIcon.png]] Libertarian Social Democracy - My left-libertarian counterpart, pretty based. This would be, but I'm not fond of anti-statism. I see it as unrealistic.


 * [[File:Modprog.png]] Moderate Progressivism - Take progressive reforms slow and steady! We need to account for some traditions that are legitimately benefitical for society.


 * [[File:Sexocracy.png]] - Just gonna put this here :)


 * [[File:Classprog.png]] Classical Progressivism - I get so much inspiration from this time period. It's a form of progressivism I really like! Social and economic progressivism without the intersectional idpol stuff is based.


 * [[File:DvPermission.png]] Permissive Society - Societal permissiveness is based.


 * [[File:Patern.png]] - It should be the job of the state to guide the people, and to provide for them.


 * [[File:PanAmer.png]] Pan-Americanism - Together we stand, divided we fall!


 * [[File:Euronaticon.png]] Pan-Europeanism - May Europe live long and prosper!


 * [[File:Nordmodel.png]] Nordic Model - Based and nordicpilled. You got me into politics, so thanks for that. (Would be better if you dropped the monarchism though)


 * [[File:Indiv.png]] Individualism - Absolutely based and red pilled, I am my own authority above all other authorities. Whether it be spiritual, community, or governmental, I control myself, and I should decide what I do with my body, not others.


 * [[File:Hedonism-cloud.png]] Mh:polcompballanarchy:Hedonism - The ideal way live ones life. Live your life how you want to as long as you're not harming anyone else, and don't let anyone tell you otherwise. "But muh misogyny, muh traditional values, blah blah blah blah blah" I'm not one of those guys who subscribe to black-pill philosophy or any manosphere nonsense lmao, nor do I hate women. And traditional values are social constructs that don't mean anything.


 * [[File:Liberal_Democracy.png]] Liberal Democracy - Not bad in theory, but gets corrupted by corporate interest and cronyism. There's a lot of improvements we can make to this.


 * [[File:Pac.png]] Mh:polcompballanarchy:Pacifism - No more shall we waste billions of dollars in pointless interventions.


 * [[File:Socgeo.png]] Social Georgism - Collective ownership of land is very based.


 * [[File:Fem.png]] Feminism & [[File:Menslib.png]] Men's Liberation - Gender equality is based.


 * [[File:Thar.png]] Anti-Authoritarianism - DOWN WITH THE NEOLBIERAL STATUS QUO, DOWN WITH FASCISM, DOWN WITH REACTIONARISM!


 * [[File:Humanismpix.png]] Humanism - You carry my ideas nicely.


 * [[File:Protect.png]] Protectionism - Outsourcing all of our jobs to developing countries has been disastrous on the US economy.


 * [[File:Globnat.png]] Alter-Globalization - International solidarity with every country without the shitty effects of globalization? What can I say but based?f


 * [[File:Cosmo.png]] Cosmopolitanism - Were you come from shouldn't matter, what matters is if we can get along.


 * [[File:Modnat.png]] Patriotism - Liking your country doesn't equal fascism.


 * [[File:Civnat.png]] Civic Nationalism - The most tolerable form of nationalism to exist.


 * [[File:Natprog.png]] National Progressivism - Basically me.


 * [[File:Internation.png]] Internationalism - Working together with other countries is based!


 * [[File:Social_corpratism.png]] Social Corporatism - My economic model, very based.


 * [[File:Secular.png]] Secularism - Based, religion should play no role in our government.


 * [[File:Reform.png]] Reformism - The best way to achieve political change in the case of liberal democracy.


 * [[File:Intercult.png]] Interculturalism - Pretty based, we need unity for our country.


 * [[File:Leftpop-0.png]] Left-Wing Populism - POWER TO THE PEOPLE! FUCK THE (((ELITE))) :troll:


 * [[File:Dem.png]] Democracy - The LEAST worst system created, besides from all the others we've tried.


 * [[File:Soclib.png]] Social Liberalism - I was apolitically you, but I've moved somewhat left from you, still think your pretty based, and the best form of liberalism.


 * [[File:Statecap.png]] State Capitalism - State owned enterprise makes it a lot easier to do business.


 * [[File:Marketsoc.png]] Market Socialism - One of the best, and reality more practical socialists, he realizes the importance of markets.


 * [[File:Leftnat.png]] Left-Wing Nationalism - Left-wing ideals and nationalism, based.


 * [[File:Soccap.png]] Social Capitalism - Human centered capitalism? Based.


 * [[File:Regulationism.png]] Regulationism - Necessary so capitalism doesn't destroy the environment or become unethical.


 * [[File:Utility.png]] Mh:polcompball:Utilitarianism - The most accurate way to measure the happiness of a society.


 * [[File:Monkeyzz-Enlightenment.png]] Enlightenment - Without you, none of this would be possible.

Kinda Based

 * [[File:Cap.png]] Capitalism - Capitalism is a good system but needs regulation and state intervention to ensure that it stays fair and doesn't become unethical


 * [[File:Socliber.png]] Social Libertarianism - Most tolerable libertarian.


 * [[File:Bhl.png]] Bleeding-Heart Libertarianism - One of the best libertarians, combine the social views of social libertarianism with this, and that would be me, but libertarian.


 * [[File:Ego.png]] Egoism - I should be the controller of my own body and life choices from all governing authorities, but disregarding morality entirely is cringe for me.


 * [[File:Laicism.png]] Laicism - While the church and state should be separate, you are too authoritarian for me. Better than having no separation of church and state at all, as I would prefer to have a strong wall of church and state than none of at all, but stripping away people's individual liberty is cringe.


 * [[File:Clib.png]] Classical Liberalism - Without you, my ideology would've never come to existence. But, you're quite antiquated in the modern day. But, without the enlightenment, none of this would've been possible.


 * [[File:Libsoc.png]] Libertarian Socialism - You're quite interesting, and I like your model of governance. But, socialism still isn't desirable to implement. But, you have to be one of the best anti-statist ideologies. I would prefer to live under this than a right-libertarian society. However, please rely less on planning and more on markets. And, stop being so revolutionary please.


 * [[File:Transh.png]] Transhumanism - Based, but chill out on replacing people's body parts and stuff like that. Be more moderate, and you would basically be perfect.


 * [[File:Pan-Nationalism.png]] Pan-Nationalism - Culturally similar countries only have everything to gain by working together. But, some of your supporters are cringe. Be less ethnocentric please, and you would be very much based.


 * [[File:Corptism.png]] Corporatism - You're a good mode of production, but should focus on getting more welfarist...


 * [[File:Orlib.png]] Ordo-Liberalism - You're pretty okay, I'll give you that, the German market economy was based.


 * [[File:Georgist.png]] Georgism - I love free cats, and LVT as well. Although, free-trade is kinda cringe and LVT shouldn't be the only tax. Still has good ideas.


 * [[File:Progconf.png]] Progressive Conservatism - Preserving the good traditions while getting rid of the bad? Based! Just be more progressive please


 * [[File:Prog-u.png]] Progressivism - Basically my social views, realize that some traditions that define our society are good. Destroying tradition for the sake of it being tradition for inclusiveness is bad.

Neutral

 * [[File:Soc.png]] Socialism - I draw a lot from you and am often accused of being you by uneducated morons, but you go too far. Free-market capitalism is bad, but you're no better in reality.


 * [[File:Dsa.png]] Democratic Socialism - Meh ideology, useful allies. You may vote for Bernie, but capitalism should ultimately stay. Even if I'm not opposed to you, I still think that socialism is quite the stretch.


 * [[File:3way.png]] Third Way - Your economics go against the idea of a social democracy and military intervention is cringe and imperialist. Can you stop bombing countries in the middle east for one fucking minute? You make my ideology look like a complete joke.


 * [[File:Socauth.png]] Social Authoritarianism - Borderline social fascism, if you lean progressive then you get put here, if you lean conservative you get put in cringe. Not to mention, how a lot of the leaders just flat out suck, and have next to no redeeming qualities.


 * [[File:Materialism.png]] Materialism - Being grounded in reality is fine, but I really care more about my own moral codes than being pragmatic.


 * [[File:IdealismPhil.png]] Idealism - Not gonna lie, I am sympathetic towards you, as I believe having strong ideals and moral reasoning above pragmaticism does go together with hedonism quite nicely. So, it would only make sense to adopt this as a philosophy, however, utilitarianism is more useful for me ngl.


 * [[File:CountEn.png]] Romanticism - Romantic idealism sounds kinda nice ngl. I should put my own moral codes above all forms of "reason" and "rationality".


 * [[File:Technocracy.png]] Rationalism - I should really not be this conflicted on my own moral ideals, but it is really hard to pick a philosophy that maximizes the usefulness of it. I would rather put my own needs above forms of rationality.


 * [[File:Existentialism.png]] Existentialism - I really do not like the idea of free will, moral subjectivity is whatever to me though. I am considering this...


 * [[File:World_Federalism2.png]] World Federalism - The idea of global unity is good, but this is unfeasible and shouldn't be tried to achieved.


 * [[File:Long.png]] Longism - You were based for your time, but that corruption and authoritarianism wasn't.


 * [[File:Patcon.png]] Paternalistic Conservatism - My more conservative self. If he wasn't conservative he'd be pretty good.


 * [[File:Atlanticism.png]] Atlanticism - While I do not support eastern powers, and think the west is the lesser evil, the current atlanticist system is just neoliberal garbage.


 * [[File:Hcon.png]] LGBT Conservatism [[File:Homocon.png]] - A complete contradiction, being progressive in one area isn't going to make me like you.


 * [[File:Glibr.png]] Green Libertarianism - Libertarianism is really cringe, but environmentalism is mega based. But, a free-market capitalist society would ultimately favor the economy over the environment.


 * [[File:Demcon.png]] Democratic Confederalism - Kurdistan should be a free country, but this as an ideology is uhh.. not that great.


 * [[File:Ford.png]] Fordism - Unironically, not the worst Dystopian ideology. wait this is a dystopia?


 * [[File:Pinkcap.png]] Pink Capitalism - While I hate the empty progressiveness of this ideology, you make old leftoids shit themselves, which is super based.


 * [[File:Cdem.png]] Christian Democracy - Some of your figures have been good forces for history, and your economic progressivism are good. But I cannot get behind a religious government even if it is democratic, so mostly cringe.


 * [[File:Islamic_Democracy.png]] Islamic Democracy - Same as above. Has been forces for both good and bad. Also, keep your traditions to yourself.


 * [[File:Cultural_Nationalism.png]] Cultural Nationalism - I understand why countries choose to preserve their own national identity, but stop being so unaccepting of immigrants. Also, assimilating the native minorities is bad, they should be allowed to keep their cultures so long as they at least adopt patriotism.

Cringe

 * [[File:Conserv.png]] Conservatism - Modern day conservatism is a complete joke lmao. Tell me a single thing modern day conservatism has conserved?


 * [[File:Fiscon.png]] Fiscal Conservatism - I understand fiscal responsibility is needed for any government, but putting the economy over the people is gay.


 * [[File:Multicult.png]] Multiculturalism - You don't work in any country you are placed in, and push pointless identity politics onto people.


 * [[File:RepubUS.png]] Republican Party - There's basically nothing good about you.


 * [[File:Demcr.png]] Democratic Party - Everything I could've mentioned above, but slightly less worse.


 * [[File:Confem.png]] Conservative Feminism - How can you claim to care about women rights?


 * [[File:Rpop-tinfoilhat.png]] Right-Wing Populism - "Um actually, the world is controlled by a group of homosexual liberal elitist jews who are using mass immigration to undermine our white heritage, and climate change is a hoax" 🤓🤓🤓 But in all seriouesness, you are a menace to any society you are placed in.


 * [[File:WelfChauvin.png]] Welfare Chauvinism - Why only give welfare to one group of people??? I think this is what tankies meant by social fascism.


 * [[File:Consocf.png]] Conservative Socialism - You say progressivism and capitalism bread degeneracy, like I actually retrospectively care. Also, dictators are in-general bad.


 * [[File:Neoliberal-icon.png]] Neoliberalism - "WhY dO YoU HaTe tHe GlObAl PoOr" because I realize such a self-serving neo-imperialist ideology only serves to enslave the global poor, that's why.


 * [[File:Mansphere.png]] Manosphere - If your entire ideology is just hating women and being a misogynistic prick then I have legitimately no sympathies for you. And no, not the term "misogyny" that is often misused by radfems or people who just hate fun in-general, because that isn't misogynistic.


 * [[File:Necon.png]] Neoconservatism - The cause of a lot of suffering in developing countries and home abroad. Eroding civil liberties, pretty much legal terrorism, and much more. Your idea of spreading democracy is overthrowing democratically elected presidents and replacing them with brutal dictators? This is truly a despicable ideology.


 * [[File:Libertarian.png]] Libertarianism - Embracing all the bad parts about capitalism that would lead to a system where corporations take control over everyone's lives with little to no regulation to stop it? What can I say, other than cringe. Atleast you don't want to waste our troops fighting in foreign land and care about civil liberties, but even then you seem to care more about property rights than the harm principle so, barf.


 * [[File:Community.png]] Communitarianism - Communitarian economics are based, that's about it.


 * [[File:Corp.png]] Corporatocracy - This is what unregulated capitalism leads too.


 * [[File:World.png]] Globalism - Of course, international co-operation is needed for the betterment of mankind, but economic globalization is just imperialism with a human face.


 * [[File:Paleolib.png]] Paleolibertarianism - How exactly do you expect a socially conservative society to maintain itself without strong government interference?


 * [[File:Conlib.png]] Conservative Liberalism - Classical liberal, my ass.


 * [[File:Libfem.png]] Liberal Feminism - How are war crimes any different if women are committing them?


 * [[File:Minarchist.png]] Minarchism - Why.


 * [[File:Ormarxf.png]] Marxism - We may agree on some things, but communism has still shown to ultimately fail each time it has been tried.


 * [[File:Isolation.png]] Isolationism - While non-interventionism is good, you're more often than not motivated my xenophobia and have never worked as a foreign policy. We need to work together with other countries to achieve multilateral agreements to protect our national sovereignty.


 * [[File:Altl.png]] Alt-Lite - How do you complain about wokeness when you are essentially just reverse wokeness? You use all of the same tactics in your "anti-sjw" rhetoric, there is no difference between the "sjw woke mob" and you, you have become the degenerate you have sought to fight.


 * [[File:Trad.png]] Traditionalism - No, I'm not returning to tradition.


 * [[File:Awaj.png]] Anarchism - Unless there is something that stands out about one of your variants, you get put here.

YOU SHOULD KILL YOURSELF NOW!!!

 * [[File:Fash.png]] Fascism - You realize, being edgy isn't a political persona. Right?


 * [[File:Cfash.png]] Clerical Fascism - Truly evil, nothing more or less to say.


 * [[File:Esofash.png]] Esoteric Fascism - Larp.


 * [[File:Nazi.png]] National Socialism -1945, let's go!


 * [[File:Eugen.png]] Eugenicism & [[File:Darwinist.png]] Social Darwinism - Retarded neo-nazi ideology.


 * [[File:Marxlen.png]] Marxist Leninism - You tankies have the audacity to call us fascists when your ideology has killed millions, and your praxis is denying genocide and mass starvation. The average worker doesn't need an elitist vanguard party controlling every aspect of their life.


 * [[File:Austrobert.png]] Austrolibertarianism - A society without any taxation or regulations at all is one that wouldn't objectively work.


 * [[File:Altr.png]] Alt-Right - Name me a sadder group of bunch than these people, will you? Also, you're not a traditionalist when most of your browser history is Japanese porn.


 * [[File:Plcn2.png]] Paleoconservatism - Completely unhinged conservatism and isolationism, name me a more objectively garbage ideology? Not to mention all the wignats who follow this.


 * [[File:Revcon.png]] Revolutionary Conservatism & [[File:Ultraprogressivism.png]] Revolutionary Progressivism - Bruh.


 * [[File:ReactPix.png]] Reactionary Modernism - You are a walking contradiction, and do not exist.


 * [[File:Christy.png]] [[File:JewTheo.png]] [[File:Muslim 2.png]] [[File:Hind.png]] [[File:Bud.png]] Theocracies - One of the biggest practitioners of fraud and deceit on this planet.


 * [[File:RelNat.png]] Religious Nationalism - No, the ghost you worship doesn't exist, nor is it the justification for any laws in our government. Now, SCRAM!!!!!!!!


 * [[File:Ethplur.png]] Ethnopluralism - I have never seen any promoters of you that haven't been white nationalists.


 * [[File:Ethnonat.png]] Ethnic Nationalism - Ethnostates are a bad idea.


 * [[File:AnEn.png]] Anti-Environmentalism - You have caused millions of deaths, and many more to come. You are the biggest threat in the West, and your influence needs to be actively countered.


 * [[File:Neolud.png]] Neoluddism - I care for the environment, which is why I oppose you. At least you don't deny basic science, but still, really horrible.


 * [[File:Imp.png]] Imperialism - Not even remotely acceptable in the modern day, disgusting ideology. Denying the rights of native populations just to subjugate them into your Empire is deplorable.


 * [[File:Ethno.png]] Ethnocracy & [[File:Racenat.png]] Racial Nationalism - This is just funny because of how sad it is, shouldn't even have to explain why.


 * [[File:Ancapf.png]] Anarcho-Capitalism - All of your followers are terminally ill 13 year olds who just discovered politics lmao.


 * [[File:Authoritarian_Conservatism.png]] Authoritarian Conservatism - The actual moderate wing of fascism. And, the majority of conservatives lmao.


 * [[File:Totalitarian.png]] Totalitarianism - There is nothing outside of your brain.


 * [[File:Ingsocf.png]] Ingsoc - This is literally 1984.

Regional Ideology Relations =
 * [[File:Monarch.png]] Monarchism - Monarchism in all of its forms in inferior to that of republicanism, and the fact you still exist in the modern day is baffling.

Positive

 * [[File:Nordmodel.png]] Nordic Model -
 * [[File:Native.png]] Indigenism -
 * [[File:Orlib.png]] Ordo-Liberalism -
 * [[File:NatProg.png]] Bull Moose Progressivism -
 * [[File:Dubcekism.png]] Socialism with a Human Face -
 * [[File:Kemal.png]] Kemalism - Getting rid of all that theocratic crap was based as hell. However, you did go too far on secularism, it was completely understandable given the state Turkey was in, shame your westernization policies are being undone by Erdoğay.

Neutral

 * [[File:Long.png]] Longism -
 * [[File:Athdem.png]] Athenian Democracy -
 * [[File:European_Federalism.png]] European Federalism - The idea of a united Europe should be to preserving the peaceful bond and achieve equality for all of its member states, not imperialist neoliberal style globalization.
 * [[File:Tito.png]] Titoism -
 * [[File:Rockrep.png]] Rockefeller Republicanism -

Negative

 * [[File:Absoc.png]] Arab Socialism - Ah yes, replace the colonizers with brutal dictatorships. You may have been better than the colonizers, but you were still bound to fail.
 * [[File:Antijap.png]] Anti-Japaneseism - Imagine for a minute, you make your entire ideology just about ethnic self hatred.
 * [[File:Baath.png]] Ba'athism - Average resistoid larper who goes "resist westoid imperialism" when they actually have to live in these "anti-imperialist regimes" and how shit they actually are. Fuck Assad.
 * [[File:Gaddafi.png]] Gaddafism - Even your achievements are vastly undermined by your corruption, authoritarianism, and conservatism. And, was a brutal rapist that caused the Libyan civil war to happen to begin with, you will not be missed. Rip, bozo. And, third international theory? More like, third intershit theory, hehe I'm so clever and funny. But, seriously, your international theory is nonsense and complete garbage.
 * [[File:Chavismo.png]] Chavismo - You started this whole mess, are you noticing a pattern here with these dictators that are so called "anti-imperialists", and just how shit their regimes are to live in?
 * [[File:Guevara.png]] Guevarism - Why do progressives look up to you? You were a horrible dictator whose achieves are overpraised to make up for the many shortcomings you had. Along with being racist and homophobic, there's literally nothing good about you.
 * [[File:Castro.png]] Castroism - Despite of what I think of the blockade, I hope your regime collapses. Death to the Cuban to government, freedom to the Cuban people, and solidarity with the Cuban protestors.
 * [[File:Trumpism.png]] Trumpism - Horrible president, failed to accomplish a whole lot while only further dividing the country with his rhetoric. Next to no saving graces about your ideology.
 * [[File:Zio.png]] Zionism - I don't support Palestine, and you respect western values better than your neighboring states which makes me lean on supporting you, but you're still committing horrific human rights abuses and ethnostates are cringe regardless.
 * [[File:Onenatcon.png]] One-Nation Conservatism -

Very Negative
Anti-Ideology Relations =
 * [[File:Dengf.png]] Dengism - Dengists explaining how having a socialist country with billionaries are actually the people's billionaries be like:
 * [[File:Stalin.png]] Stalinism - Bloodthirsty maniac who defeated the nazis just to use the same means the nazi's used against the Jews directly onto the Jews again. And, a pedo as well.
 * [[File:Juche.png]] Juche - Korean INGSOC.
 * [[File:Burmasoc.png]] Burmese Way to Socialism -
 * [[File:Khom.png]] Khomeinism -
 * [[File:SL.png]] Silver Legionism - I oppose everything here lol. Also, not to mention the fashie larp.
 * [[File:Jihad.png]] Jihadism - I don't have to explain why terrorism is wrong, now do I?
 * [[File:Polpot.png]] Pol Potism -

Positive
Anti-Authoritarianism - Reject totalitarian dictatorships, embrace freedom and democracy.

Anti-Imperialism - Empires are evil, and shouldn't exist.

Anti-Collectivism - I have no moral obligation to serve the collective, and to say otherwise is founded on baselessness.

Anti-Racism - Racism is a modern day evil that has no place in society.

Anti-Nihilism - Nihilism is dumb and pointless.

Anti-Sexism - Hating someone for the gender they were born as is the lowest form of tribalism.

Anti-Easternism - Eastern states are oppressive shitty authoritarian dictatorships.

Anti-Reactionarism - All reactionaries are closeted homosexuals who have family issues.

Anti-Paganism - Pagans are cringe and larp, there's nothing else to say.

Anti-Judaism - Some retard is going to conflate this with antisemitism, but I'm PURELY just talking about the religion, not ethnic Jews.

Anti-Idpol - Identity politics in general are preachy, tribalistic, and only further submit our differences instead of uniting us. Which, is determinantal to US politics as a whole. And yes, BOTH sides are guilty as charged, whether it be someone who is celebrating the fact that they are gay and black or someone celebrating the fact they are straight and white, it ultimately doesn't matter. Both sides are cringe regardless and do nothing for societal equality.

Anti-Clericalism - Pretty based, religious authority suppresses individuality and assaults our civil liberties. Just don't hate religious people or their beliefs.

Anti-Religion - Why should some imaginary ghost created by humans get to dictate how I live my life?

Anti-Communism - Communism is the definition of failure.

Left Anti-Communism - Leftists can be anti-communist too! However, I'm not a leftist in a traditional sense obviously, as liberalism and leftism are often confused for each other when they mean different things, but I am somewhat leaning left so I can consider myself a left anti-communist.

Anti-Fascism - Fascism as a political ideology has been reduced to being practiced by terminally online 14 year olds who just discovered politics from playing hoi4.

Anti-Consumerism - It's funny to say that I'm against consumerism, mostly because I'm very fiscally conservative with my own money and don't feel the need to impulse buy things just because I can because it doesn't take a whole lot to satisfy my own needs. Obviously, everything we do is inherently consumeristic, I'm not against consumerism entirely, as that would be contradictory, just against overt spending on material goods. Keep your own budget good while enjoying the things you like to do.

Anti-Nazism - Yeah, I don't think I have to explain this one. Show me a modern day Neo-nazi that isn't a complete degenerate (impossible, they are all are).

Anti-Austerity - Austerity measures has been a disaster for the public as a whole.

Anti-Old Leftism - The old left are a bunch of wannabe revolutionaries who call anything they don't like shitlibs while their only praxis from what I've seen is being terminally online, and endorsing anything that goes against western hegemony, like: China, Russia, Hungary, Belarus, ect.

Anti-Colonialism - Colonialism is an evil that must be fought against.

Anti-Zionism - It's funny, if you removed all factors and just showed me the Israeli vs Palestinian conflict outright, I would easily side with Israel. And, Israel would be preferrable to Palestine any day, but giving Israel our foreign aid only perpetuates the military industrial complex and the horrible crimes against humanity committed by the Israeli state, it's strong enough to stand on its own, they don't need our help.

Anti-Xenophobia - Why should people be treated differently based on where they come from?

Anti-Putinism - Putin is a kleptocratic authoritarian conservative dictator, I shouldn't have to explain why I dislike him.

Anti-Dengism - China is a totalitarian pseudo-fascist dictatorship, screw anyone who apologies for the CCP and its government.

Euroscepticism - The EU in its current state is a neoliberal empire, it desperately needs to reform and its governing bodies if it wishes to survive the modern day.

Anti-Globalism - International co-operation benefits humanity, but economic globalization is neo-imperialism that must be fercely fought.

Anti-Wokeism - Wokes are racists in-denial. I'm sorry. This isn't being anti-progressive, as this applies to both sides of the political debate. Whether it's reverse right-wing wokeness, or left-wing wokeness, both sides are equally cringe and preachy.

Mixed
Anti-Capitalism - While free market capitalism is bad, endorsing anti-capitalism is too far for me.

Anti-Westernism - I understand the problems with the west currently, but the west is the objectively lesser evil in the world's affairs as well. I will still call out the west for its role in imperialism where it is due, but it's not nearly as bad as those eastern states.

Anti-Anarchism - Authority sucks, but there still needs to be a state. But, many people who claim to be "anti-anarchy" also endorse totalitarianism as well.

Anti-Conservatism - Well it is accepted that traditions themselves stem from the past, some traditions are good for society and should be kept. I'm all in favor of a permissive society, but some of you guys go a step further with the intersectional idpol stuff, still better than most conservatives though.

Anti-Socialism - I don't think socialism is feasible to fully implement either, but you need to chill out with being against any form of welfare or government intervention in the economy.

Anti-Romanticism - Ehhh, I'm really conflated on you. As, idealistic romanticism goes together with hedonism quite nicely as a philosophy, I'll see in the future.

Anti-Monarchism - I understand why monarchy as a system represents past oppression. But, if some countries that have ceremonial monarchies want to keep their monarchies for tradition, they should be allowed to do so.

Anti-Multiculturalism - I oppose multicultural from a progressive standpoint, as diversity for the sake of diversity is dumb and only tolerates unprogressive cultures, but many of you guys who oppose multiculturalism just do it because they oppose any sort of immigration in-general.

Negative
Anti-Feminism - Feminism is still needed in society. And besides, many of you guys just are just blatant misogynists who hate women.

Anti-Pornism - Censorship of media just because you disagree with it is dumb also i'm super fucking horny aaaaaaa

Anti-Sexualism - An even cringier version of the above.

Anti-Abortionism - Why would anyone to unironically label them self as this?

Anti-Progressivism - REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!!!!!

Anti-Liberalism - REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!!!!!

Anti-Reformism - Revolution in democracies is pointless.

Anti-Enviromentalism - There's basically no difference between this and conservatism lmao.

Anti-Nationalism - One's own love for their culture and nation are entirely natural.

Anti-Americanism - I take my problems with the current US system, but this is just gay.

Anti-Egalitarianism - Everyone in society is created equally.

Anti-LGBT - I disagree with the LGBT pride movement, but this is just childish and stupid.

Anti-Individualism - Societal permissiveness is based, cope and seethe.

Sinophobia - I dislike China and its government, not its people like some morons here have claimed.

Russophobia - Once again, I also do not hate ethnic Russians if that wasn't obvious. Self-Insert Relations= (Note: This is purely ideological, unless you're a massive dick/larper)

Good

 * [[File:Kirblyism-Icon.png]] Kirbly ([[File:Socgeo.png]]/[[File:Transh.png]])- Very based progressivism. Not sure about this whole world federalism and transhumanism thing though. But I can admire your futuristic world-view, even if it is far-fetched. You're pretty based.


 * [[File:Ninjack.png]] Ninjack-Aus ([[File:Libms.png]]/[[File:World_Federalism2.png]]) - You have pretty good cultural views, and good economics. although military intervention is cringe. You seem like a good person


 * [[File:Mebrouk.png]] Mebrouk ([[File:Socdem.png]]/[[File:Islamic_Liberalism.png]]) - We're basically the same, very based ideologically wise. Although, a religious democracy for me is really eh considering everything I've said about it, but in your case it would be the most practical.


 * [[File:BeryAbLib.png]] BeryAb ([[File:NeoClib.png]]/[[File:Nalib.png]]) - For someone whose right-libertarian leaning, you're pretty based. Our principles our the same but our end goals are different. Overall, good. (Also massive shame your reddit account got terminated out of no where, rip)


 * [[File:YellingLiber.png]] YellingYowie ([[File:Socliber.png]]/[[File:Neobert.png]]) - While your economics and cultural stances are acceptable, your foreign policy is severely misguided. Like, how do you plan on waging war in countries while also having a small government?


 * [[File:Liberal-icon.png]] Liberal ([[File:Scientocracy_Small.png]]/[[File:Socdem.png]]) - I like what I see here, based!


 * [[File:Enaysikey.png]] Enaysikey ([[File:Socliber.png]]/[[File:Neotech.png]]) - Welfare libertarian, nice. Although being into eugenics is weird.


 * [[File:Avelicius.png]] Joogotakensaad ([[File:Soccap.png]]/[[File:Progconf.png]]) - Welfare capitalist, based.


 * [[File:Cflski.png]] Sykar Socialist ([[File:3princ.png]]/[[File:Socdem.png]]) - Your economics don't sound bad and you also hate the PRC as well, so you're pretty well off in my book.


 * [[File:JudePortrait.png]] High Priest Jude ([[File:Dsa.png]]/[[File:Leftpop-0.png]]) - DemSoc, tolerable. Based cultural views too.


 * [[File:TonyNew.png]] Tony567 ([[File:Marketsoc.png]]/[[File:Sep.png]]) - Really weird set of beliefs. Market socialism is pretty eh, as an economy centered around workers co-ops has shown to be the most successful form of socialism, but still not desirable. Along with this separatism stuff.


 * [[File:Vonali.png]] Vonali ([[File:Socliber.png]]/[[File:Civlibert.png]]) - Progressive Social Libertarianism, not bad.


 * [[File:Skyrum536.png]] Skyrum536 ([[File:Demsocstar.png]]/[[File:Prog.png]]) - DemSoc, against authoritarianism and is a democratic federalist. Nice.


 * [[File:EvolvingSoc.png]] DuyQuangNguyenPham ([[File:Marketsoc.png]]/[[File:Civnat.png]]) - A more leftist version of me, I agree with him on a lot of stuff.


 * [[File:TheIced.png]] The Iced ([[File:Georgist.png]]/[[File:Transh.png]]) - Too reliant on free markets but LVT is based, and so is cultural progressivism.


 * [[File:SamKibGuy_icon_.png]] SamkibGuy ([[File:Republicanismpix.png]]/[[File:Thar.png]]) - Your ideology is good, but I don't understand how you can like authoritarian communists while fighting for democracy at the same time. Atleast we agree on Social democracy which is based.


 * [[File:Yoda8soup.png]] Yoda8soup ([[File:Socgeo.png]]/[[File:Ecosoc.png]]) - Your economics for me personally are too left-wing, but your progressivism, and environmentalism are both very based.


 * [[File:RabbitIcon.png]] ComradeRabit95 ([[File:Demsocstar.png]]/[[File:Leftnat.png]]) - Too lefty, but not bad. Don't know a whole lot about your ideology since you don't have anything on your page, just going off your ideologies alone.


 * [[File:Silasf.png]] Sorcersilas is here ([[File:Distributist.png]]/[[File:Libms.png]]) - I prefer unions, but still, a decently good ideology.


 * [[File:Liberalsoc.png]] TheJester ([[File:Liberalsoc.png]]/[[File:Marketsoc.png]]) - Too left-wing for me personally, but still a decently based ideology. Love your cultural takes.


 * [[File:Vamp.png]] DerVampir666 ([[File:Distlib.png]]/[[File:Farm.png]]/[[File:Geolib.png]]) - Your ideas are pretty interesting. Not a fan of this whole cultural protectionism crap, free-trade, or agrarianism, though. But, your social values are good I suppose. Interesting for a libertarian market socialist.


 * [[File:Uzarashvilism.png]] Uzarash ([[File:Progconf.png]]/[[File:Demsocstar.png]]) - We have a lot of common enemies on foreign policy, but your more traditional views are cringe. At least we both hate China and Russia.


 * [[File:Glencoe.png]] Glencoe13 ([[File:Liberalsoc.png]]/[[File:Steinval.png]]/[[File:Minmut.png]]) - Libertarian socialism to me is a big meh. Tolerable compared to the status quo, but still not diserable for me personally, not the worst though.

Meh

 * [[File:NSL.png]] Pirate Tails ([[File:Natprog.png]]/[[File:Liberaltarianism.png]])- If you were less nationalist then you'd be fine.


 * [[File:Sweatingcup.png]] SweatingCup2632 ([[File:Sec.png]]/[[File:Newkeynes.png]]) - Bootlicker, but not the worst.


 * [[File:Neoairisu.png]] SumisuAirisu ([[File:Demcon.png]]/[[File:Anqueer.png]]) - Meh honestly, not a fan of anarchism but could be worse.


 * [[File:Councilguy2.png]] Councilguy ([[File:Anpostleft.png]]/[[File:Ego.png]])- Not fond of egoism, but you're a nice user.


 * [[File:Ultroneism.png]] LordCompost86 ([[File:Ego.png]]/[[File:Skepticism.png]]) - Obviously not a fan of this ideology or egoism, but you seem like a nice person.


 * [[File:PostChronic.png]] ChronicFemcel ([[File:Anpostleft.png]]/[[File:Post-an.png]]) - Cringe egoist but nice person.


 * [[File:Neotechnocracy.png]] BasedCringeOrMeh ([[File:Neotechnocracy.png]]/[[File:Transh.png]])- Pretty based economically and culturally, but authoritarianism isn't based and democracy is cool.


 * [[File:Nivballf.png]] Niveous Laccolith ([[File:Ego.png]]/[[File:Anpostleft.png]]) - Anarchism is cringe. But is socially progressive.


 * [[File:Ancom_Furry.png]] ThisIsMyUsernameAAAA ([[File:Ancom.png]]/[[File:Antifa.png]]) - Based cultural values, but being an ancom isn't helping.


 * [[File:Affiliated-grump.png]] Affiliated ([[File:Postciv.png]]/[[File:Econil.png]]) - Some post civilization leftist, wonky and funny tbh.


 * [[File:TDRH.png]] ThatDudeRightHere ([[File:Liberalconservative.png]]/[[File:Cdem.png]]) - Not a whole lot to say about this, moderate conservativism is whatever to be honest. We do have a lot in common in interests through so that's cool.


 * [[File:Bsaheedism-icon.png]] Bsaheed527 ([[File:Post-an.png]]/[[File:Anpostleft.png]]) - Yeah, I'm really unsure what to say about this ideology. You as a person though, are chill.


 * [[File:Ashley.png]] AshleyHere ([[File:Libsoc.png]]/[[File:Indiv.png]]) - I honestly like your new ideological development. Still not great, but better than what it was before. Libertarian socialism atleast is a step up.


 * [[File:TipuiSmall.png]] Tipui ([[File:Ego.png]]/[[File:Anpostleft.png]]) - Another egoist, okay this is getting out of hand. I will say your earlier years were quite based, if that means anything.


 * [[File:M99.png]] M99.exe ([[File:Synd.png]]/[[File:Ormarxf.png]]) - A communist, albeit not the worst one I've seen and seems to be friendly towards socdems, atleast you're pragmatic.


 * [[File:DragonRed.png]] DragonRed ([[File:Dsa.png]]/[[File:Leftnat.png]]) - While promoting scientific advancement is definitely based, your authoritarianism is definitely not.


 * [[File:AbEntball.png]] The Grand Anarch ([[File:Post-an.png]]/[[File:Hedonism-cloud.png]]) - So you managed to make your ideology even more crazy, but honestly a step up from your last.


 * [[File:Drunkardsdjxfh.png]] Stk ([[File:Neoliberal-icon.png]]/[[File:Libhawk.png]]) - Doesn't fail in every regard, so gets refrained from putting in cringe. But still, neoliberal economics is cringe, and being a liberal hawk is no better than a Neoconservative.


 * [[File:And3 .png]] And3 ([[File:Commie.png]]/[[File:Globnat.png]]/[[File:Radenv.png]]) - Communism and anarchism are cringe for me, sorry. Progressivism and international co-operation are net positives.


 * [[File:S1984.png]] Savvas1984 ([[File:Statlib.png]]/[[File:Transh.png]]) - You're an unironic state liberal? Only good thing is your technological take.


 * [[file:Syntridem2.png]] Applethesky2021 ([[File:Cdem.png]]/[[File:Georgist.png]]) - Your mindless puritanicalness and interventionism are just awful, also worshiping dictators like Chiang kai shek is just cringe, the only good thing is your economics.


 * [[File:PagTheo.png]] Pantheon ([[File:Unimon.png]]/[[File:SocDist.png]]) - Surprisingly based economics, and I like civil libertarianism. But man, that monarchism stuff has to go. Also, is a vaushite as well.


 * [[File:Ioist.png]] Iooootheanarchist ([[File:Anqueer.png]]/[[File:Antifa.png]]) - Just your typical anarshit. Also, is weirdly an interventionist as well? Makes sense considering they are a vaushite. Atleast you have seemingly tolerable cultural takes.


 * [[File:InexUser.png.png]] Inexistent-User ([[File:Soctrans.png]]/[[File:Technocracy.png]]) - The only bit I really like about this is your endorsement of technological development, everything else is pretty cringe though.


 * [[File:TheElectricBomb.png]] TheElectricBomb ([[File:Lpop.png]]/[[File:Dsa.png]]) - Hating NATO and socialism is kinda cringe. But, I did indeed epically troll you.


 * [[File:Novochirotesla.png]] Chirotesla ([[File:Marketsoc.png]]/[[File:Consocf.png]]) - Your ideology may be one of the least bad out of the old leftists, but it has seriously gotten worse over time. Too left-wing on economics. Being anti-imperialist, environmentalist, a fair-trade protectionist, pro-choice, cultural integration that focuses more on culture tolerance, and more tolerant on LGBT issues than your other friends, which are all welcome. But, overall, too conservative for my liking.


 * [[File:Quark.png]] Quark ([[File:StateathFedora.png]]/[[File:Socgeo.png]]) - Cool dude, and has pretty decent economics. But, authoritarianism is something I cannot get behind under most circumstances.


 * [[File:Anglo-Germanic_Socialist.png]] Anglo-germanic socialist ([[File:Ormarxf.png]]/[[File:Progress.png]]) - Progressivism is hella based, but Marxism isn't.


 * [[File:MLM.png]] Marsvner ([[File:MLM.png]]/[[File:Ultraprogressivism.png]]) - I'm really not a fan of Marxism, but progressivism (even if you take it way too far for my liking) is cool.


 * [[File:TheFed.png]] TheFedGuy101 ([[File:CathDem.png]]/[[File:ClassDistr.png]]) - Economically wise, we somewhat match each other. But, everything else I see here is cringe, as I value my own individual worth over pointless things like organized religion or conservatism.


 * [[File:MrsVzrFlag.png]] MarsVizir [[File:MrsVzr2.png]] ([[File:Prog.png]]/[[File:Demsocstar.png]]/[[File:World Federalism2.png]]) - I don't hate or love any of your ideas, I dislike how you idolize utopian economics though. And, while alter-globalism is good, world federalism is unnecessary. But, progressivism is something I can get behind.


 * [[File:Amm1.png]] Am_m ([[File:Anarcho-Frontierism.png]]/[[File:Anin.png]]/[[File:Antr.png]]) - Your individualism goes too far, even for me. And, anarchism is really cringe, as you're just letting yourself be ruled by a mob instead of a governmental authority, meaning there is no fundamental difference between the two.


 * [[File:Rebel Alliance.png]] CarbynSobek ([[File:Leftnat.png]]/[[File:Statesoc.png]]/[[File:Lpop.png]]) - Based left-wing nationalism and populism, but I'm not in fan of a state-guided economy under socialism, that has always lead to economic stagnation and it just being a glorified version of state capitalism. Supporting progressive policies like abortion rights and feminism is based though.

Not Good

 * [[File:Typicalfan2.png]] Typicalfan4 ([[File:Altl.png]]/[[File:Natcon.png]]) - Typical alt-lite, but still is a moderate.


 * [[File:USLibertarians.png]] NotADopeMan ([[File:Chilib.png]]/[[File:Obj.png]]) - A libertarian whose completely opposed to state intervention? Cringe, albeit not the worst thing I've seen. It's still pretty bad.


 * [[File:Libcon.png]] ResponsibleCitizen ([[File:Libcon.png]]/[[File:Conlib.png]]) - Conservativism and Libertarianism are gigasoy, along with isolationism. You seriously want the US to give up its influence in the world as a hyperpower? What is wrong with you?


 * [[File:SomeCrusade.png]] SomeCrusader1224 ([[File:Trad.png]]/[[File:Conlib.png]]) - This dude is my opposite in almost every way other than government, not a bad person though.


 * [[File:Smelegem.png]] Smelegem ([[File:MLM.png]]/[[File:Islamic_Democracy.png]]) - Unironic maoist. Literally one of the worst communists to ever exist in the history of ever with the worst economics that I've ever heard. Cool person though ig.


 * [[File:RojanALT.PNG]] Rojo346 ([[File:Conlib.png]]/[[File:Socliber.png]]) - Typical conservative, nahhhh... You as a person are fine though.


 * [[File:NeoLibtard.png]] ANewDude ([[File:Neoliberal-icon.png]]/[[File:Progressive_Imperialism.png]]) - Illiterate neoliberal retard who thinks hating neoliberalism means hating the global poor.


 * [[File:Distributist.png]] Dumnorix ([[File:Distributist.png]]/[[File:Trad.png]]) - Cringe conservative, but it's not everyday you see a traditionalist libleft.


 * [[File:JoeyFloppa_boo.png]] JoeyFloppa ([[File:Libcon.png]]/[[File:Austrobert.png]]) - I hardly see how you're an Individualist.


 * [[File:LeninisBasedsmall.png]] Leninisbased556 ([[File:ML.png]]/[[File:Authprog.png]]) - Progressivism is cool, but pretty cringy Marxist-leninist. (Also why are you so anti-semetic?)


 * [[File:Danielspaniel-Icon.png]] Danieltenspaniel ([[File:ML.png]]/[[File:StateathFedora.png]]) - A tankie who is atleast socially progressive.


 * [[File:MossadTest.png]] Mossad ([[File:Relzion.png]]/[[File:Conlib.png]]) - A religious conservative who stands for Israel. Basically PragerUism.


 * [[File:Azathoth.png]] Azathoth ([[File:Post-an.png]]/[[File:CountEn.png]]) - Nothing against you but you reject enlightenment thinking and are a reactionary anarchist, but you're not even socially conservative so you don't get put in the lowest tier.


 * [[File:Statlibertarian.png]] SuddenWriter - ([[File:Libertarian.png]]/[[File:Anticommunism.png]]) - I refuse to believe this is anything other than a meme lmao.


 * [[File:Cball-France-Beret.png]] Cheebow8 ([[File:Conservative.png]]/[[File:Trumpism.png]]) - Yeah, I'm basically not convinced by anything I read on this page. Conservatism is cringe and soy. Although, you are very friendly from what I've observed, I will give you that.


 * [[File:SST-icon.png]] ShadowRaiden ([[File:Progconsoc.png]]/[[File:Distributist.png]]) - So, you're not as conservative. But your anti-individualist stances are garbage. There's a reason why people protest over the govenment on things that are needed for societal improvement like vaccines, it's because people do not trust the government, and neither do I. Nor, will I buy into this collectivist mindset you have. Overall, some good, mostly bad.
 * [[File:DN_Adm.png]] DarknightYuusha-11 ([[File:Consocf.png]]/[[File:Marketsoc.png]]) - Basically, everything I said about Shadow could be applied to you, with there being not a whole of differences. Too left-wing on economics, first world cultural conservatism, and being really lenient on authoritarianism are really cringe for me.
 * [[File:Balodismconsmall.png]] IvarBalodis ([[File:Guildsoc.png]]/[[File:Progconsoc.png]]) - Corporatism is good, even if too left-wing. But, still too socially conservative for my taste. And, once again, anti-individualism is garbage.
 * [[File:Xenoassemblage.png]] Xenosystems - ([[File:ColdGod.png]]/[[File:CybNil.png]]/[[File:POSTHUMANISMICON.png]]/[[File:Fut2.png]]) - You have interesting beliefs to say the least. The only thing I can really say that is tolerable about this ideology is its seemingly being progressive. Outside of that, I agree with next to nothing with this fever dream you call an ideology.


 * [[File:MLL.png]] NotLibra ([[File:ML.png]]/[[File:MLM-Alt.png]]) - Typical ML, apologizes for brutal dictators that would've killed him compared to the state that he lives in now, progressivism and alter-globalism is cool, but that's it.

Objectively Cringe Garbage

 * [[File:KaiserKlaus.png]] KaiserKlausMouse ([[File:PanGerman.png]]/[[File:Cball-CSA.png]]/[[File:NeoFash.png]]) - Cringy larping fed.


 * [[File:Ukraiana.png]] Ukraiana ([[File:Neonazi_ball.png]]/[[File:Whitesup.png]]) - Typical wannabe white nationalist.


 * [[File:MedDavilanda.png]] Davilanda13 ([[File:Ancapf.png]]/[[File:Reactcross.png]]) - What a steaming pile of horseshit of an ideology. Ancaps are super edgy.


 * [[File:ReactionaryCentrism6.png]] Bannned ([[File:Cfash.png]]/[[File:Christy.png]]) - Firstly, this "centrist" was hardly a centrist. Secondly, Cringe edgelord larper. Glad SumisuAirisu made you live up to your username. Good riddance lol.


 * [[File:Coindorni-icon-new.png]] Coindorni ([[File:Ancapf.png]]/[[File:Reactcross.png]]) - Another reactionary ancap, how much of you guys just are secretly fascists in denial?


 * [[File:Vizantion-Storm.png]] TheHellenicStorm ([[File:Strasser.png]]/[[File:Neonazi_ball.png]]/[[File:Flang.png]]) - Nazi, credit where credit is due though you're an actual national socialist. Still a Nazi, which is fucking cringe, retarded, and most definitely a larp.


 * [[File:OrthReactPaleominarchist.png]] BasedRussianMikuru ([[File:Feud.png]]/[[File:Orth.png]]) - A reactionary theocratic larper who has defended feudalism. Overall very cringe and weird.


 * [[File:Heinrich_Cheung.png]] Heinrich Cheung ([[File:Neonazi_ball.png]]/[[File:Nazcap-Hat.png]]) - So this is the "superior aryan master race" I've heard so highly about, huh? Totally not a larp.


 * [[File:Classfash.png]] LKR15tye ([[File:Euras.png]]//[[File:Fash.png]]) - Fashoid. "He hates me as much as he hates the nazis according to his page". Your ideology has lead to nothing but death, destruction, and misery for all that had to suffer under it.


 * [[File:Duckf.png]] Duck-Citizen ([[File:Ancapf.png]]/[[File:Reactcross.png]]) - ancap? check. reactionary? check. vomit worthy ideology? check.


 * [[File:TolkienIRLicon.png]] Tolkien_IRL ([[File:Abmon.png]]/[[File:Nazcap-Hat.png]]) - If this serious, I have actually zero words.


 * [[File:Palostius.png]] Palostius ([[File:Ingsocf.png]]/[[File:Reactcross.png]]/[[File:Darwinist.png]]/[[File:Mansphere.png]]) - Sexist incel larper. How long as your ass been without a shower, holy shit. This entire dude's personality is gloating his shit takes.


 * [[File:Dualusf.png]] DualPlay1 ([[File:Statesoc.png]]/[[File:StateathFedora.png]]) - A conservative authoritarian communist. Basically just a cringier version of quark.


 * [[File:Noel21231-icon.png]] Noel21231 ([[File:Altl.png]]/[[File:Wumao.png]]/[[File:Reactlib.png]]) - Typical Malaysian Wumao retard who simps neo-nazis and thinks being "anti-woke" makes him cool.


 * [[File:EpicConIcon.png]] NazBolGANG12 ([[File:Tradcon.png]]/[[File:Distributist.png]]) - Ok, on a serious note, you're not getting put here because of your personality but because of your ideology. Your personality is fine, your ideology on the other hand is very cringe.


 * [[File:Socnat.png]] AmericanFuturist ([[File:Socnat.png]]/[[File:Fash.png]]) - Was cringe the first time, is still cringe the second time.


 * [[File:Baconsalad123_Icon.png]] Baconsalad123 ([[File:Sorelia.png]]/[[File:Nazi.png]]) - Racial nationalism, totalitarianism, fascism. Easily one of the most dystopian self-inserts on this site.


 * [[File:Svs.png]] SNEEDIVS ([[File:Catheo.png]]/[[File:Monarch.png]]) - Bruh why are there so many reactards on this site. I think this dude actually thinks it's the 10th century or something.


 * [[File:NatDem.png]] Black drone ([[File:Authcap.png]]/[[File:Mansphere.png]]/[[File:Rpop-tinfoilhat.png]]/[[File:Plcn2.png]]) - Now, this is a prime example as to why I will never get my morality from religion (as if every single reacttard on this site wasn't example enough). Where do I start? Authoritarian religious conservatism and manosphere? Yeah, along with you supporting corrupt politicians while being supposedly "anti-corruption". Pretty bad.


 * [[File:Firebender12345ism.png]] Firebender12345 ([[File:Monarch.png]]/[[File:3P.png]]) - Lol, Monarcho-fascist who wants to restore a failed political systems back in Ireland. Monarchy and fascism is dead for a reason, good luck with that.


 * [[File:ImmorThought.png]] TheImmorxy ([[File:Statesoc.png]]/[[File:Hoxha.png]]) - Just your averagely unremarkable Totalitarian Marxist-Leninist. Basically, nothing good.


 * [[File:Mikolayism_Pixel2.png]] MedicsChaotics ([[File:ModStrasser.png]]/[[File:Consocf.png]]) - Claims not to be anti-semitic, yet uses anti-semitic dogwhistles? Also, what is the hell is "moderate strasserism"? Any way, your authoritarianism and unironic liking of otto strasser are just massive nopes.


 * [[File:PATS.png]] ChineseSocialist ([[File:CronCapMask.png]]/[[File:Wumao.png]]/[[File:XiJinpingThoughtf.png]]) - Don't take this personally, as I mean this purely just on an ideological level. Your page gave me cancer and aids to read because of how illiterately written it was. Overall, just your average totalitarian dengoid china defender. Atleast you don't pretend that CCP is a government that respects human rights, which is atleast a nice surprise, as a lot of China defenders I see try to make China out to be better than what it is, you don't bother with any of that. Also, China isn't transitioning to socialism by 2050, nor are you a Marxist-Leninist.


 * [[File:Dengf.png]] 国际联盟球 ([[File:CronCapMask.png]]/[[File:Wumao.png]]/[[File:XiJinpingThoughtf.png]]) - Bruh, China is a totalitarian one party dictatorship with no respect for human rights. To side with all countries in the world, you choose the Chinese government?
 * [[File:RonziCom.png]] Ronzipot ([[File:Statesoc.png]]/[[File:Christcom.png]]) - Bruh this dude literally went from a classical liberal to an Marxist-Leninist in like a month, and he calls us larpers. Lol.
 * [[File:Technototball.png]] BERNHE0504 ([[File:NeoFash.png]]/[[File:Ultranat.png]]) - Now, you are, in every way, my political opposite. Not too different from all the fascist bs stuff I've seen.
 * [[File:ComradeKretk.png]] ComradeKretk ([[File:Ultraprogressivism.png]]/[[File:Stalin.png]]) - The irony of supporting dictators that go against everything you stand for and would've killed you for existing is hilarious, like with most modern tankies in the West. Not even the progressivism makes up for the unironic totalitarian worshipping and everything I just mentioned.
 * [[File:SmartSimulatorIcon.png]] Smart Simulator ([[File:Authcon.png]]/[[File:Right-AnEn-alt.png]]/[[File:Natcap.png]]) - I'm sorry but, your ideology is retarded and flat out everything I'm opposed too.

*Dies of cringe*

 * [[File:FabiusBigGayHat.png]] PaleoFabius ([[File:Altrightfemboyicon.png]]/[[File:Jnaz.png]]/[[File:Rwsjw.png]]/[[File:Hfash.png]]) - Massive asshole and a larper. Typical wannabe internet fascist who called several people within this community racial inferior. Overall, just your average alt-rightoid retard. Kys, racist asshole. Rip, bozo. And yes, Jews control all of our public institutions and international organizations, is that a problem Gaybius?


 * [[File:Mysticism.png]] Mysticism ([[File:EsoPinkCap.png]]/[[File:Jnaz.png]]/[[File:Rwsjw.png]]/[[File:Hfash.png]]) - Yes, I get my beliefs from paradox strategy games, how could you tell?


 * [[File:Soyjak.png]] AnAnonBoi123 ([[File:Postconan.png]]/[[File:Globnat.png]]/[[File:Kak.png]]) - Ok you really do just fucking suck, jesus christ. You cause so much unnecessary fights for no reason and when you get called out on it you just say it's an "ideological critique". Literally no one likes you, lmao.

Quadrant Relations =
 * [[File:Yugotard.png]] YugoslavPartisan2 ([[File:SJW.png]]/[[File:WokeCommiesucc.png]]/[[File:Altleft.png]]/[[File:Antifa.png]]) - Stalinoid who is the most typical SJW moron on this entire site. I once acted similarly to you, but I've changed my behavior since then because I know it's not worth getting into any worthless online drama, I recommend you do the same.

Based

 * [[File:Centrist-yellow.png]] Centrism - Nice, and moderate, like all should be. Extremism is cringe. And, centrist economics are just in-general pretty based, with the right amount of individuality with economic collectivism, you're perfect. The state should obviously be big enough to uphold harm prevention, but to also leave them alone whenever their freedom poses very little threat.
 * [[File:Libunity-yellow.png]] Libertarian Unity - You have the entirely right idea when it comes to individual freedom. But, you're too anti-statist. The state is still needed for harm prevention, otherwise, very based.

Neutral

 * [[File:Leftunity.png]] Leftist Unity - I'm not against socialism, nor do I think it failed each time. But, I'm still not keen on establishing it. Seeing as, I find socialism to be more exploitive for the average worker than capitalism is, just look up labor theory of value and see how bunk it is. But, at least a lot of your followers are progressive.
 * [[File:Libleft.png]] Libertarian Left - You'd be objectively better to live in than a libright society, I'll give you that. And you have the right idea when it comes to individual liberty. But, once again, too anti-statist. Along with many of your supporters being progressives, which is certifiably based.
 * [[File:Libright-yellow.png]] Libertarian Right - Right unity, but with some better characteristics. With supporting civil liberties, opposing interventionism, and paternalism, which is nice. But, still suffers from much of the same issues as right unity, with the addition that many adherents to this are socially conservative. But, it's not conservative, then it's remotely tolerable.

Cringe

 * [[File:Rightunity-yellow.png]] Rightist Unity - I'm against implimenting socialism, but I'm also against free-market capitalism as well. Capitalism may be the best system invited, but to fully trust it this much is just vomit worthy, and is exploitive.

Bruh
People Relations =
 * [[File:Authleft.png]] Authoritarian Left - Overly statist and bureaucratic nightmare, not to mention the wumao problem this quadrant has as well.
 * [[File:Authright.png]] Authoritarian Right - Authoritarian capitalism, name me something more vomit worthy to be honest. No respect for individual liberty or wealth redistribution? NOPE!
 * [[File:Authunity.png]] Authoritarian Unity - Your economics will unfortunately not save you from being put here. Many of you guys are alt-right retards and neo-nazis. Which is really cringe. And even your most moderate ideologies are still dumb, as overt parentalism is retarded, the individual should be allowed to do as they please.

Positive

 * [[File:Sanders.png]] Bernie Sanders (95/100) - You're a promising candidate, and have been fairly consistent on your views for your political carrier, which is admirable. But, you also give into leftist idpol too much, along with having unironically praised dictatorships a couple of times, which is pretty cringe. And, some of your betrayals were also bad as well. But, with all considered, you are the most respectable American politician in our current political climate.


 * [[File:SwedenSocDem.png]] Olof Palme (93/100) - What else is there to say about you as a politican other than based and redpilled? You were one of the best presidents Sweden ever had, and calling out American imperialism were it was due was also good as well.


 * [[File:Shoecialism.png]] Shoe0nHead (90/100) - You were one of my first inspirations and introductions to politics. Although your earlier days were quite cringe. You've earned a special spot for one of the first political commentators I watched.


 * [[File:Mill.png]] John Stuart Mill (91/100) - The harm principle is based. Do what you want to do as long as you're not harming others is how society should be run.


 * [[File:Socdem.png]] Roman Albertovich Abalin (95/100) - Based and redpilled socdem from Russia, we agree on basically everything politically. Shame you had to leave your country due to the borderline fascist dictatorship that is the Putin regime. You've had such an influence on me as well about how I view authoritarian regimes as well, and how shitty and oppressive they are to live in. Russia would be a better place with more people like you living there.


 * [[File:JoshuaWong.png]] Joshua Wong (94/100) - Keep resisting chinazis! Glory to hongkong and those who fight for freedom against Chinese tyranny!


 * [[File:RussiaOfTheFuture.png]] Alexei Navalny (82/100) - You expose the corruption of the United Russia Party and are way better alternative to the current Russian government. But, your borderline ethnic nationalism when it comes to Ukraine and other matters are cringe, you're nearly a perfect replacement for Putin, just drop all of this other stuff please.


 * [[File:Lincolnism.png]] Abraham Lincoln (83/100) - Ended slavery, shame you got assassinated.


 * [[File:Classlib.png]] John Locke (85/100) - While I am not a big fan of your economic model, you were quite based for your time, and so was the enlightenment. The way you fought against reactionary retards and monarchists was certified based.


 * [[File:Socdem.png]] Leung Kwok-hung (93/100) - One of the founders of the social democratic pro-democracy camp in hong kong. Fuck Chinese authorities for what they've done to you, you're a hero to Hong Kong. Rest in power, hero.


 * [[File:FDRismF.png]] Franklin D. Roosevelt (90/100) - Gigachad in a lot of ways, fought against the Nazis and Japanese Imperalists, shame you had to put the Japanese in internment camps, and while they weren't on the same level as the holocaust, still sucks you had to do that.


 * [[File:Dubcekism.png]] Alexander Dubcek (86/100) - Imagine if your government hadn't be crushed by the Soviets. You were one of the more based people in the soviet bloc, and would've left your country off far better than in the hands of the USSR.


 * [[File:NatProg.png]] Theodore Roosevelt (80/100) - Easily the best president we've ever had, up there with FDR. Although your Imperialism was pretty bad.


 * [[File:Keynes.png]] John Maynard Keynes (95/100) - The man who invented the best economic model, stay mad lolberts.


 * [[File:Gore.png]] Al Gore (88/100) - Based environmentalism, you would've been a lot better in many ways to George Bush.


 * [[File:MLK_Jr.png]] Martin Luther King Jr (94/100) - One of the best civil rights leaders in the 20th century, shame you got assassinated.


 * [[File:Gorb.png]] Mikhail Gorbachev (84/100) - Democratized the USSR, ended censorship, and his other reforms were based. Shame they didn't have the effect you wanted, which caused your country to collapse. You had the right idea, and Russia would be a lot better if you were instated into power and not Putin.


 * [[File:Kemal.png]] Mustafa Kemal Ataturk (88/100) - One of the least bad dictators, getting rid of the theocratic Islamic crap was based. Shame all your work of westernizing your country is being undone.

Neutral/Mixed

 * [[File:Obamium.png]] Barrack Obama (57/100) - You were ultimately unremarkable in your presidency, typical centrist democrat.


 * [[File:Corbynism-ball.png]] Jeremy Corbyn (42/100) - Eh, I used to look up to you somewhat, even if I would've never voted for you if I had lived in the UK. But, looking into you further, you do have some legitimately questionable takes and other things that make me lower my opinion on you greatly that I am not unable to look past, still better than the neolibs in labour party.


 * [[File:Bidenism.png]] Joe Biden (55/100) - Meh, you've done some good. But, still the compromise and not what we need.


 * [[File:Long.png]] Huey Long (42/100) - While you did a lot of good for the state of Louisiana, the way you did it was bad! While you may be one of the only good authoritarians, someone could easily come on in and undue all your work and do worse and there would be nobody to stop them.


 * [[File:Tito.png]] Josip Broz Tito (45/100) - Most practical socialist, although authoritarianism is cringe. Atleast you threw fascists into pits and returned them to where they should go, which is undoubtedly based.


 * [[File:Cball-Ukraine.png]] Volodymyr Zelenskyy (42/100) - Look, while I do support your right to self-determination, you're really no different from any other oligarch in post-soviet states.


 * [[File:Cball-British_India.png]] George Orwell (44/100) - Being against authoritarianism is based, but your homophobia, conservatism, and general prejudice are cringe.

Negative

 * [[File:RepubUS.png]] Mike Parson (15/100) - A complete joke of a state Governor, kleptocratic and incompetent idiot. Very typical, did nothing for covid, heighted tensions between protesting groups, blocking voting reform. God, I hate you so fucking much.


 * [[File:Merkelism.png]] Angela Merkel (21/100) - Typical neoliberal. I don't really have to explain why I dislike her.


 * [[File:Trumpism.png]] Donald Trump (21/100) - You were one of the worst presidents America had in the 21st century. Your tax cuts did not help anyone but the rich, your attacks on American democracy and your authoritarianism, careless protectionist policies, climate denialism. Realistically, should've been impeached. How you haven't been disowned by the GOP establishment astounds me.


 * [[File:AOC.png]] Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (23/100) - You're basically everything that is wrong with the democratic establishment.


 * [[File:Statlib.png]] Justin Trudeau (23/100) - Neoliberal imperialist and a fake progressive. There is very little good I can actually say about you.


 * [[File:Vaushism.png]] Vaush (21/100) - Annoying debate bro. I looked into the whole "justifying CP" stuff and it seems more far fetched now with more context given, but I'm just unsure about that. With this, you're still an annoying and contrarian youtuber. Atleast you support NATO, out of all things, so called "leftist" lmao.


 * [[File:Chavismo.png]] Hugo Chavez (14/100) - Why does anyone look up to this guy as an "anti-imperialist" baston? He was a horrible leader, the socdems that oppose your government would be better.


 * [[File:Reagan.png]] Ronald Reagan (12/100) - Overall, one of the worst presidents America ever had to endure, tricke-down economics are a scam that only made the rich richer and the poor poorer, funded terrorists, and your presidency still has a profound effect on America today. (you're also in hell waiting for heaven to trickle onto you)


 * [[File:Thatcher.png]] Margaret Thatcher (12/100) - Ding dong, the wicked bitch is dead.


 * [[File:Shapirocube.png]] Ben Shapiro (13/100) - You're a massive dumbass who can only win debates with college kids. Why anyone listens to you is beyond me.


 * [[File:Christianright.png]] Steven Crowder (13/100) - Overall, a massive pussy.


 * [[File:MagicPT.png]] Henry Kissinger (11/100) - Pretty much a terrorist. I really hope you get what's coming to you one day.


 * [[File:Chilib.png]] Milton Friedman (14/100) - Lolbert. Go learn some basic economics.


 * [[File:RonPaul.png]] Ron Paul (14/100) - Everything I despise neatly rapt up into one little package!


 * [[File:BoJo.png]] Boris Johnson (12/100) - Not only was brexit very cringe, your leadership in general is just terrible.


 * [[File:FIDESZ.png]] Viktor Orbán (11/100) - Very cringe Russian asset who is destroying his own country.
 * [[File:Mesocon.png]] Dennis Prager (12/100) - Founder of PragerU, enough said.


 * [[File:GWB.png]] George W. Bush (11/100) - War mongering imperialist and war criminal.


 * [[File:PiS.png]] Andrzej Duda (14/100) - Your party is a laughing stock. From its corruption, authoritarianism, nothing good I can say about it.


 * [[File:Plutocrat.png]] Elon Musk (11/100) - You should be thrown in jail, and your monopoly broken up.


 * [[File:Plutocrat.png]] Jeff Bezos (11/100) - Amazon should be broken up.


 * [[File:Plutocrat.png]] Mark Zuckerberg (11/100) - We all know you're a lizard. Also fuck facebook and the metaverse.


 * [[File:Hitler.png]] Basically, anything related to the Nazis or other Fascist groups (-infinite/100) - The amount of suffering you've inflicted onto the world will never be forgotten. Never again.


 * [[File:Polpot.png]] Pol Pot (-infinite/100) - You left Cambodia in ruins and were a genocidal maniac.


 * [[File:Baath.png]] Bashar Al Assad (6/100) - Genocidal and incompetent. Although God, Syria, and Bashar is an absolute bop, why do authoritarian regimes always make the best songs?


 * [[File:Putin.png]] Vladimir Putin (6/100) - The day your evil empire gets overthrown is the day that the world can see peace.


 * [[File:Lukash.png]] Alexander Lukashenko (6/100) - Cringe despot, I fully back the protests against the Byelorussia government. Hopefully one day your reign comes to an end and the Byelorussian people do not have to live under your tyranny.


 * [[File:Dengf.png]] Deng Xiaoping (8/100) - Your reforms may have helped and were necessary for China, but you still quite evil. Not AS bad as your predecessors, but still awful. Not to mention, what you did to things like welfare programs, the protesters, ect.


 * [[File:XiJinpingThoughtf.png]] Xi Jinping (0/100) - You've in a lot of ways ruined China and set it on a course for failure, undoing Deng's reforms. Just to think there was some chance China could see a better future. Fuck you! Burn in hell forever, genocidal totalitarian tyrant.


 * [[File:Mao.png]] Mao Zedong (-infinite/100) - You may have brought china out of the feudal system and gave women rights, but you were a totalitarian genocidal maniac who starved millions upon millions of his own people.


 * [[File:Stalin.png]] Joseph Stalin (-infinite/100) - You killed millions of your own people for quite literally no reason. Like, the worst of the worst.


 * [[File:Pinochet-hat.png]] Augusto Pinochet (0/100) - Many of Chile's modern problems can be attributed to you.


 * [[File:CountEn.png]] Oswald Spengler (0/100) - Your works are retarded, and your modern followers like jerking off to drawn images of children.


 * [[File:Hoppef.png]] Hans-Hermann Hoppe (0/100) - As if the retarded ancap larping wasn't enough, this "physical removal" stuff is just on another level of stupid.


 * [[File:Obj.png]] Ayn Rand (0/100) - Worst thing Stalin did was let this bitch out of the USSR alive. Objectivism, more like, objectively shit.

Further Information

 * -|Literature=
 * [[File:Globnat.png]] Age of Consent by Harper Perennial (Reading)
 * [[File:Soclib.png]] On Liberty by John Stuart Mill (Planned)
 * -|Wikipedia=
 * [[File:Socdem.png]] Social Democracy
 * [[File:Nordmodel.png]] Nordic Model
 * [[File:Social corpratism.png]] Neo-corporatism
 * [[File:Globnat.png]] Differences with anti-globalization

Political/Compass Unity
Matt in-general is a centrist in this regard, and is willing to work with both moderate leftists and rightists (so long as they're progressive) to achieve political goals. However, he's more willing to work with libertarians than he is with authoritarians, so he would favor libertarian unity over authoritarian unity most of the time. While he isn't against the idea of united fronts against ideologies like fascism, those united fronts shouldn't tolerate undemocratic ideologies. So, if there is to be a united front, this front should be made up of only democratic ideologies, and should be as peaceful as possible. He's willing to work with leftists who reject central planning as their means of production, as centrally planned socialism is bad and ineffective at addressing the needs of the people. So, as long as they are pro-market, and are moderate, he is willing to work with them. Like democratic socialists. With all of this, they have to be socially progressive as well, but not subscribe to the whole elitist intersectional identity politic culture war BS, and should focus on class issues. Largely depends, he will work together with libertarians who are centrists economically the most, but is more apprehensive with working along side people who are economically right-wing. But, so long as they are socially progressive, democratic, and economically moderate, to him, they are allies in the fight for freedom. He generally doesn't get a long with most authoritarians due to his stances on authority, So, there will be little to if any co-operation with authoritarians. Authoritarians who are center are ok given they are progressive, but authoritarians who are anti-democratic are not, and will be flat out refused to co-operate with regardless of what their social stances are. As, being democratic is one of the necessary ideological components for political co-operation. Depends on what type of rightist they are, if they're a neoliberal, then no. They also have to be socially progressive and economically moderate as well, otherwise, in most instances, you will see no co-operation with people on this side of the compass
 * -|Left Unity=
 * -|Libertarian Unity=
 * -|Authoritarian Unity=
 * -|Right Unity=

Q&A
Q what do you think of the cultural views of hardline mls you mentioned earlier
 * - Feel free to ask me anything within this section. If you want to view old comments, go here.
 * Q UserWiki:DragonRed - Why did you become pan nationalist when you were a anti -nationalist?
 * A - Well I became more nationalist because of my stances on immigration so i figured an ideology that supports both nationalism and internationalism would only make sense to adopt since I never stopped being the former.
 * Q UserWiki:Ninjack-Aus - If all western liberal democracies (IE, NATO/EU) where to collapse, what non-atlanticist ideology would you least dislike to take it's place?
 * A - Well preferably ideologies that allow free and fair elections, anything that isn't utopic that allows for such would be fine by me (mostly). I can't really say, but that's the best answer I can give.
 * Q [[File:Panth.png]] - What are your thoughts on Yan Xishan thought?
 * A - It's conservative and authoritarian, so I don't like it.
 * Q - What's your opinion on the President of Palau, Surangel Whipps Jr?
 * A - i know nothing about the politics of Palau, so idk.

Comments

 * - If you want to make any comments, make them here.


 * Baconsalad - i have no idea why you have such a long pcb page and no i did not read it all. Add me (or update it).


 * - add me
 * - Ok!
 * - Hey, Matteel. Don’t forget to add me when you get the chance!
 * - That's already been done.


 * - Add me here (for the lulz, please and thank you).
 * - ok
 * - Why did you give Gorbachev such a high mark? His ideologies were based, but he was incompetent as hell and didn't do anything to stop kleptocrats like Yeltsin. He was part of why Russia and post-Soviet states are in their current state.
 * - Well i rank him that high because I like him as a figure, sure he didn't do a whole lot to stop that, but I still like the reforms he did make during the time period, even if did cause the eventual decline of the USSR. But you're right, I lowered his ranking I gave him slightly just to take in factor all of that.
 * [[File:Panth.png]] - Who do you simp for?
 * - Well I said I liked progressive democrats, so take anyone there that is anything center of left (although nothing past that) and I probably have a good opinion of them.


 * - Hey man, I have adjusted my review for your page.
 * - Thanks ^.^

Userwiki:Marsvner - dude can you add me in discord? My discord name is marsvner#2980.
 * happy forth of july Westoid ☠️2🇺🇸
 * - Cope commie.
 * My best friend on this site
 * - What do you mean?
 * - I changed many things, update relations on me
 * - Sure thing.
 * - Yo there, add me?
 * - Almost done finishing up my page, give me tomorrow from the point I sent this message


 * [[File:MrsVzrFlag.png]] Marsis [[File:MrsVzr2.png]] - I added you, feel free to add me as well
 * - You will be added to me page
 * - Hi matteel, I'm once again asking your opinion on LiangGuoxiong,he claims to be a trotskyist but keeps flirting in Hongkong LSD,also imma eager to see your opinion of trotskyists inside socdem UK Labour Party.
 * - I don't know who that is unfortunately.
 * - Pls update thnx
 * - Alright, will do.
 * - Ok but this doesn't change the indisputable fact that laissez-faire capitalism is a failure and that free-markets are also a failure and that libertarianism failed us and that neoliberalism is almost as dumb as libertarianism and that John Locke and Adam Smith both oppose libertarianism and that both of them wanted regulation or a government and that John Locke supported taxes and that minarchists and "anarcho-capitalists" which aren't even real anarchists are neo-feudalists who want massive wealth inequality and a class system between the bourgeoisie and the proletariat and that under free-markets more than 40% of food is wasted and thrown in the dumps when they could be used feeding people and that classical liberalism failed 7 times in the span of 50 years and that employers treat their employees badly to maximize profit and that the CEO of a billion-dollar corporation will spend millions to bust unions when they could just let the employees build a union so the employees get represented but they don't because they are greedy and would prefer the extra millions of dollars more than their employees being treated well and that the NAP is stupid and flawed and that libertarians worship the NAP like it's a god and that capitalism makes people greedy and that capitalism needs reform and regulation in order to be successful and that libertarianism and classical liberalism will just lead to crony capitalism with an oligarchy of a few extremely wealthy billionaires while there are people barely getting by and that currently the 3,000 richest people in the world have more wealth than the rest of the world combined and if that doesn't prove that the system is messed up then that proves that you support people working terrible wages to barely get by and that unions are the best counter to tyrannical employers and that the minimum wage should be increased so the employees make more money and that child labor is immoral and that people in third-world countries shouldn't be getting paid such bad wages and that anarcho-capitalism is an oxymoron because there is a class system between the bourgeoisie and the proletariat while anarchy seeks to remove all hierarchy and that anarcho-capitalism should be just renamed to "fascist-capitalism" because it allows the people with a lot of money to control our lives in every way possible however they want and the government isn't there to protect us. (2 extra notes: I didn't make most of the copypasta but I agree with most of it).
 * - I don't know were this came from, but I agree.
 * [[File:MLL.png]] CynicalLibra - Update relations please.


 * Mind updating relations? I did drop the isolationism (but still oppose NATO and military alliances in general, but am open to regional unions provided they fit certain criteria) and I’m more of a progcon rather than a conservative (as it was done during my last days of said conservative stage). Likewise I don’t really take “lesser evils” anymore when it comes to geopolitics (ex: both NATO and Russia/China are bad and that’s what matters, the War in Ukraine is still a capitalist war in the end, despite Ukraine being slightly better as they’re the defender) -
 * - Sure thing. And honestly, I think I was getting a bit too caught up larping as a neocon because it literally made me consider the atlanticist position I hold, I'm probably going to change that position as I just don't agree with the idea that any country deserves its hegemony, not saying I won't stop supporting the West, just that Atlanticism makes it sound like I unconditionally support the west when that's actually not the case. I just hold no sympathies towards authoritarian states.


 * - Steven Crowder is not only a conservative bigot that attacks transgender people for no reason and says racist things, but he also said that people with OCD are pedophiles and deserve to die.
 * - Oh I know.
 * - That's why I consider him to be a neo-fascist rather than a conservative.
 * [[File:Glencoe.png]] Glencoe13- Damn wouldn't be surprised

Glencoe13- hey tony here add me plz link to ideology: https://polcompballanarchy.miraheze.org/wiki/Glencoeism
 * - Ok.
 * - Hello Matteel, care to update relations? I no longer consider myself truly conservative socialist anymore nor would I necessarily describe myself as "conservative in the first world" any longer.
 * - Sure thing.
 * [[File:Scripper.png]] Scripper - Add me.
 * - Will do.
 * [[File:Ethplur.png]] [[File:Esofash.png]] [[File:Crusadism.png]] NewCato: Mate, you trying to be unique? You're kind of basic to be honest. Though most the things you say are quite garbage. Also your opinion is invalid since you are a globetard.
 * - dc + didn't ask + ratio and ur gay.
 * [[File:Glencoe.png]] Glencoe - damn fabuis is that you?
 * - When was there any indication this was Fabius?
 * **[[File:Glencoe.png]] Glencoe - he called you fake American at first,Changed Fabius quickly BREHNES page and BREHNES said fabuis was coming back.
 * [[File:Esofash.png]] NewCato:Bringing back the black and tans?
 * [[File:Rebel_Alliance.png]] CarbynSobek - Add me?


 * - "I should be the controller of my own body and life choices from all governing authorities, but disregarding morality entirely is cringe for me." - So you admit that morality should "control" you, it should be your governing authority. Stirner is not immoral, nor does he remove evaulative language. The role of morality, especially as a universal system places the individual under it, so if you truly valued yourself above anything, it would also include morality. But this does not mean you cannot value others, or their wellbeing. But if it comes down to it, are you going to limit yourself for another side of yourself, i.e. sacrifice yourself because you could not live without the other, or are you going to sacrifice yourself because your life and personal value was already forfeit and under the heel of "the right thing to do"?