UserWiki:IvarsBalodis

This is new the ideology of Wiki and Reddit user, IvarsBalodis (despite the username, he is not Latvian, but rather an American of German, Lithuanian, and Appalachain (Scots-Irish) heritage). It is a left unity,   left-wing nationalist ideology with significant influences from the  guild system (guild socialism). It sits on the cultural right side of the compass, albeit not extremely so.

[[File:Soc.png]] True Economic Freedom [[File:Demsocstar.png]]
He believes that true economic freedom lies in socialism, which allows workers to democratically control decisions within their professions and workplaces and reduces the power of unconcerned capitalists who do not care for the lives of their workers.

[[File:Vanguardism.png]] Class Vanguardism and Old Leftism [[File:Left-wingCon.png]]
He subscribes to the Old Left, meaning that issues of class and economics should be prioritized over social issues and questions of identity. He believes that leftist movements and leadership of the modern age - the    "New Left" - has been led astray in the pursuit of radical progressive, woke ideology. He sees their attachment to identity politics as being one of the causes of a weakening labor movement in the West, as members of the working class have grown less fond of their hyper-progressive talking points. He doesn't oppose working with progressive socialists so long as they put class before identity and can agree with at least some of his principles.

[[File:Corptism.png]] An Organized Economy [[File:Guildsoc.png]]
Building on the previous section, businesses would be organized along lines of position, profession, or industry, with democratic control occurring within each one. Each of these lines of organization would be considered a Guild, harkening back to the medieval guild system used as a framework in the guild socialist economic model. This would avoid the incoherence of a mass democracy among ALL workers within a company or organization, and allow those who are most invested in their trade to be able to have meaningful discussion and collaboration among their likeminded peers. They would democratically decide workplace decisions in place of unbeholden bosses, capitalists, or shareholders, and select a representative to represent their Guild at the Congress of Guildsmen, which would operate in collaboration to direct the economy at a large level. These Guilds would collaborate directly with consumers to ensure production quotas are met and the quality of work performed is satisfied. In turn, this will create a sense of trust among consumers and producers and create a well-organized, efficient, and democratic economy.

[[File:Distributist.png]] Free and Fair Markets [[File:Trustbust.png]]
He supports strong anti-trust laws to prevent companies from growing so powerful as to dominate the market. The same principle will apply to the Guilds to prevent one from gaining too much power and influence over the lesser Guilds. In addition, free enterprise among aspiring entrepreneurs would be encouraged on the small scale, with laws which allow the opportunity to be afforded by as many people as possible. To this end, he is a market socialist, favoring market allocation combined with public, democratic ownership of productive property, while allowing state control over industries which are essential to the well-being of the nation (such as healthcare and transportation).

[[File:Leftnat.png]] Socialist Patriotism [[File:SocialistPatriot.png]]
An avowed patriot and nationalist, he opposes open borders as tools for capitalists and neoliberals to devalue wages in their home countries and undeservingly increase profits. However, he does not support ultranationalism, national supremacy, or jingoism, and absolutely despises imperialism. Patriotism and nationalism must always be proletarian in nature and devoted to anti-imperialist and socialistic causes. He strongly opposes the position held by many Marxist-Leninsts, Maoists, and other "tankies" that mass swathes of land in the US, Canada, and other post-colonial nations must be returned to indigenous peoples (a.k.a. "land back"), seeing that this position would be highly unpopular by almost all citizens of the nation, only appealing to a very small subsect, and would ultimately sow division and opposition to the nation. Instead, he supports social policies aimed at improving the lives of indigenous peoples without taking land from non-indigenous, and giving it to peoples who have been gone for decades, or in some cases, centuries.

[[File:Community.png]] Cohesion of Community [[File:Cultcon.png]]
He wants to create a stable community of like-minded individuals. To that end, he is extremely opposed to multiculturalism, which only serves to weaken societal bonds between individuals and reduces success in collaborative activities, such as unionization. This would be detrimental to the functioning of the Guilds, which is built upon the requirement of successful intra- and inter-professional collaboration. While he doesn't oppose immigration as a concept, he believes that immigration should be reduced to a level that does not result in the unwinding of a nation's culture and immigrants should be required to assimilate into their destination country's culture.

[[File:TradPrgess.png]] Progress or Conservation? [[File:PrgessTrad.png]]
Views on conservatism or progressivism are not clear-cut, and he does not support all tenets of conservative or progressive ideology. Why is this? Well, these terms have always been relative to a predetermined culture in a predetermined period. For example, I am in favor of equal civil rights for all races. In today's culture, this would be considered a normal viewpoint, supported by most people on all sides of the aisle except for the fewest diehard reactionaries. In 1950's America, this would place me on the cultural left. In the antebellum South, this would place me on the cultural far left. Another, somewhat opposing example would be the nuclear family. I support a more communal and non-nuclear family structure. To many on the American right, such as classical- and paleo-conservatives, this would be a culturally-progressive point of view as it deviates from the "tradition" of a nuclear family. But look across all of humanity and cultures and communal family structures were present for thousands of years before the arrival of capitalism or other mass societal changes. Also, conservatives and reactionaries have at times wished to conserve elements of society that operate to its detriment, such as liberal capitalism and slavery. Meanwhile, progressives (especially of the extreme variety) want to throw the baby out with the bathwater by ditching anything that can be a benefit to society. The point is, these terms are arbitrary as they are always used in reference to wildly-varying time periods, cultures, and ideals, and not all elements are worth conserving or removing. I just want to revolutionize current society to shape it to my ideal values and keep it that way until evidence shows that it needs reformed once again. To that end, I consider myself a form of conservative-progressive, as I want to progress current society to mold to my current views, and maintain those once they are achieved.

[[File:Laicism.png]] Secular Governance [[File:Atheism.png]]
Church and state should be separated, and religion should be mostly a personal matter. Freedom of religion should still be allowed, but with immoral and inhumane practices being banned. These include kosher and halal slaughter as well as male circumcision of Judaism and Islam. Likewise the myriad of bogus new-age LARPy cults cropping up these days would not be constitutionally protected as religious institutions in his country.

[[File:Sec.png]] State and Liberties [[File:CultLib.png]]
When society is in peace, the state should have little involvement in the citizens' personal lives, except for keeping the population safe (e.g. the maintenance of a police force). However, it should still definitely exist to protect the nation from foreign invasion and imperialist exploitation. Whistleblowers who are able to expose corruption of government officials would be protected as a vital part of checking the balance of power. This is since thinks fighting corruption is one of the most important things the citizenry can do to keep their government from becoming tyrannical or unpopular.

[[File:Cball-China.png]] China and Taiwan [[File:Cball-Taiwan.png]]
He believes that Taiwan should be granted de jure independence and be recognized internationally, seeing that the  PRC has no legitimate control over the country. However, he fully supports the PRC over Hong Kong and  Tibet and other separatist movements since these areas are legally Chinese. Otherwise he has no strong opinions on China.

[[File:Castro.png]] Cuba [[File:Castro-PCC.png]]
He believes that the Communist Party of Cuba should remain in power, but implement market reforms while maintaining strong state control over vital industries, such as healthcare (seeing as it is one of the biggest shining success stories of Cuba). The embargo should be immediately ended in all forms, seeing it as a pointless measure anyways (well, other than to cause the Cuban people to needlessly suffer in the name of ideological dickwaving).

[[File:Zio.png]] Israel and Palestine [[File:Cball-Palestine.png]]
He fully supports Palestine, seeing that the movement for the establishment of Israel (Zionism) was entirely astroturfed and the Palestinians had no say in the matter. He supports the left-wing Fatah and condemns the religious extremism of Hamas, but understands their frustration at how the Palestinians are treated by Israel.

[[File:Cball-Russia.png]] Russia and Ukraine [[File:Cball-Ukraine.png]]
I cannot in good faith fully support either government. Both Ukraine and Russia have a history of corruption. NATO is an imperialist arm of the United States and former colonial Western European powers, while Putin works at the behest of the plutocratic oligarchs and doesn't give a damn about the Russian working class. I stay with the millions of innocent Ukrainian people who are being attacked by the Russian invasion force, and the Russians who protest this war in Russia proper, as well as the ethnic Russians in Donetsk and Luhansk who want further autonomy. I find solidarity with those suffering from imperialist aggression, not those perpetrating it.

Ideological Progression
---> // ---> // ---> // ---> // Explanation: When I first got into politics, I quickly became a steadfast anti-capitalist while still holding onto the beliefs of liberal democracy and opposition to authoritarian socialism. This was back during Obama's first term so I was also a strong supporter of the Democratic Party at this time. As I grew older I became more socially conservative while moving a bit to the right on economics as well. In early to mid-2019, I discovered third positionism and while reading up on ideologies such as Classical Fascism or Strasserism, I never quite stuck with one specific ideology, though still remaining opposed to racial nationalism. Opposing the large amount of feds, "wignats", and generally vile people infesting the third positionist circles, I have now moved back to the economic left, becoming more socialist and less culturally right-wing (still not culturally left, just prioritizing economics over social issues).

And, as I read more theory, I am becoming somewhat more left on economics, but we'll see how that plays out...

8Values
Economic Axis: Socialist

Equality 82.1% - Markets 17.9%

Diplomatic Axis: Patriotic

Nation 68.3% - Globe 31.7%

Civil Axis: Moderate

Liberty 49.2% - Authority 50.8%

Societal Axis: Neutral

Tradition 54.1% - Progress 45.9%

Closest Match: Revolutionary Socialism

NewValues
Economic Axis: Socialist

Equality 88.6% - Markets 11.4%

Diplomatic Axis: Nationalist

Nation 83.1% - Globe 16.9%

Civil Axis: Moderate

Liberty 51.3% - Authority 48.7%

Societal Axis: Traditional

Tradition 66.6% - Progress 33.4%

Closest Match: Revolutionary Socialism

LeftValues
Revolution 92.6% - Reform 7.4%

Scientific 60.9% - Utopian 39.1%

Central 36.7% - Decentral 63.3%

International 26.8% - National 73.2%

Party 28.8% - Union 71.2%

Production 38.9% - Nature 61.1%

Conservative 70.6% - Progressive 29.4%

Closest Match: Left-Wing Nationalism 100%

Icons I Made

 * [[File:Fashkemal.png]] Fascist Kemalism Fashkemal.png
 * [[File:DemNazbol.png]] Democratic National Bolshevism DemNazbol.png
 * [[File:LibertarianNazbol.png]] Libertarian National Bolshevism LibertarianNazbol.png
 * [[File:SocFem.png]] Socialist Feminism SocFem.png
 * [[File:FemSoc.png]] Feminist Socialism FemSoc.png
 * [[File:PlannedCap.png]] Centrally-Planned Capitalism PlannedCap.png
 * [[File:Siegetard.png]] Siegetard Siegetard.png
 * [[File:SocMon.png]] Socialist Monarchism SocMon.png

Relationships
For users, I mainly take into account their ideologies and not their personalities, pretty much everyone I encounter on the wiki and in Discord is a good person imo.

Ideologies

 * [[File:Left-wingCon.png]] Old Leftism - The best leftism, not obsessed with identity politics.
 * [[File:Guildsoc.png]] Guild Socialism - Trade guilds are the best form of economic organization.
 * [[File:Distributist.png]] Distributism - Widespread private ownership of land and property is based!
 * [[File:Natcom.png]] National Communism - Based fellow nationalist with left-wing economics.
 * [[File:Leftnat.png]] Left-Wing Nationalism - Any socialist should be willing to fight for his or her country and people regardless of the flaws of its liberal-capitalist past governments.
 * [[File:Gaddafi.png]] Gaddafism - One of the greatest revolutionaries of the 20th century, who greatly improved the material conditions of the Libyan people.
 * [[File:Cball-Ireland.png]] Irish Republicanism - Come out ye black and tans!
 * [[File:Paetel.png]] Paetelism - German social nationalism was based, too bad your movement didn't gain much traction.
 * [[File:Deleon.png]] De Leonism - Militant unions and bloodless revolution are based! Just embrace the utility of the state some more and you're perfect!
 * [[File:Euskadi_Carlism.png]] Euskadi Carlism - Based monarchist market socialist and left-wing nationalism.
 * [[File:Cathwor.png]] Catholic Workerism - Dorothy Day was extremely based and probably one of the best anarchists to ever live.
 * [[File:Natan.png]] National Anarchism - Anarchist but based, most people think this ideology is inherently racially/culturally supremacist but it's not.
 * [[File:Councom.png]] Council Communism - Not bad. Somewhat similar to the eventual system I would like to arrive at.
 * [[File:Luxem.png]] Luxemburgism - Had some alright ideas and was murdered by [[File:Succdem.png]] Succdems.
 * [[File:Agsoc.png]] Agrarian Socialism - I support the farmer's guilds.
 * [[File:Ghandi.png]] Gandhian Socialism - One way to strive for socialism through non-violent means.

Users

 * [[File:NazBolGANG12.png]] User:NazBolGANG12 - Based guild socialist gang member. One of the earliest members I recognize from the Fandom wiki.
 * [[File:Scarlet_Icon.png]] UserWiki:ScarletTheVampireQueen - Based old leftist. We're a pretty close ideological match, but I might be a bit more socialist than you.
 * [[File:Admiralism_Icon.png]] UserWiki:SussyNuoh - Based market socialist. Another close ideological match.
 * [[File:GenShrekf.png]] User:Comrade Shrek - Based national communist and cool person, views are like a more authoritarian version of myself
 * [[File:Bmanthought.png]] User:Bman - Fellow anti-imperialism enjoyer.
 * [[File:KaiserKlaus.png]] User:KaiserKlausMouse - Pretty good for a monarchist.
 * [[File:NeoImmorx.png]] User:TheImmorxy - Arab socialism and left-wing nationalism are based!
 * [[File:%27Murican_Fash.png]] UserWiki:AmericanFascist - Seems like a decent guy. Probably the best "fascist" on this site.
 * [[File:Chirotesla.png]] User:ChiroPro - Pretty based ideology, even though I'm slightly left of you on economics.
 * [[File:ProgFash.png]] UserWiki:AmericanFuturist - Seems like a pretty cool guy.
 * [[File:Baconsalad123_Icon.png]] UserWiki:Baconsalad123 - A based left-wing nationalist even if a bit too far on the classical conservative and racial side.

Ideologies

 * [[File:Strasser.png]] Strasserism - I wanted to put you in based because I like your economic model, but I loathe your association with regular NatSoc.
 * [[File:Progress.png]] Progressivism - Economic progressivism is based but not social progressivism (at least not in the modern West and places that aren't still practicing literal slavery).
 * [[File:ML.png]] Marxism-Leninism - Most of your modern adherents are cringe with some exceptions. Also party vanguardism is susceptible to elitism, cronyism, and corruption.
 * [[File:Mao.png]] Maoism - Patriotic socialist but also a genocidal maniac who enacted regressive policies that resulted in famines.
 * [[File:Transh.png]] Transhumanism - I support it only when used in moderation, e.g. to eradicate diseases and cancers. However we shouldn't remove or extremely alter our humanity.
 * [[File:Auton.png]] Autonomism - You seem very disorganized. How about the guild system?

Users

 * [[File:Ultroneism.png]] User:LordCompost86 - Seems nice enough though I'm not really into egoism.
 * [[File:Councilguy2.png]] User:Councilguy - Bit too individualist, but your economic views are still based.
 * [[File:Ukraiana_Tiny_picture2.png]] UserWiki:Ukraiana - Nice nationalist, but you should move away from economic liberalism (capitalism).
 * [[File:Republicanismpix.png]] UserWiki:DragonRed - Seems OK, don't know much about it though.
 * [[File:Nivballf.png]] User:Niveous_Laccolith - Way too progressivist. But go back to guild socialism and you would be ultra based.
 * [[File:Typicalfan2.png]] UserWiki:Typicalfan4 - Nationalist yes, but also cringe capitalist.
 * [[File:Vizantion-Storm.png]] UserWiki:TheHellenicStorm - Conservative guild socialist but also too fascist. Would have put you in based tier one year ago, though. Otherwise you're a nice guy.
 * [[File:IrishNeoMarxist(alt).png]] UserWiki:YugoslavPartisan2 - Your ideology used to be so much better, wtf happened.

Ideologies

 * [[File:Cap.png]] Capitalism - The ultimate enemy of the proletariat and the environmnent.
 * [[File:Plutocrat.png]] Plutocracy - Honestly the same thing as the last guy.
 * [[File:Neoliberal-icon.png]] Neoliberalism - On top of being controlled by the capitalist elite, you are an imperialist and often a radical cultural progressive, plus you've conned many leftists into supporting identity politics as opposed to class solidarity.
 * [[File:3way.png]] Third Way - Liking welfare a little more doesn't make you any better than the last guy.
 * [[File:Lolbert.png]] Libertarianism - Gun rights are amazing but everything else about this is cringe as hell.
 * [[File:Timocracy.png]] Timocracy - The ones who produce nothing of value should rule society? That's retarded.
 * [[File:Cball-Isis.png]] Jihadism - Religious extremism is retarded, also, get Assaded!
 * [[File:RightNazbol.png]] Right Nazbol - You're not even real, you're just the meme version and the reason everyone thinks of the ideology as "nazi-communism".
 * [[File:Nazi.png]] National Socialism - The logical conclusion of race-based ideology and ultranationalism.
 * [[File:Radfem.png]] Radical Feminism - Only good thing about you is you oppose sex "work", but everything else is cringe.
 * [[File:Libfem.png]] Liberal Feminism - Too individualist, fails to address the capitalist exploitation of women and in facts aids it.
 * [[File:SJW.png]] Woke-ism - Identity politics are destroying the cohesion of the working class, and you're now what [[File:Altr.png]] they think of when they think of leftism! I genuinely fucking hate you!
 * [[File:RepubUS.png]] Republican Party - Conserves nothing but Plutocrat's wallets and genocidal Zionist state of "Israel".
 * [[File:Demcr.png]] Democratic Party - Supports milquetoast welfare programs (though often supports tax cuts for the rich as well) while supporting the Zionists just the same as their supposed "rival".
 * [[File:Antifa.png]] Anti-Fascism - Antifa is so obviously an astroturfed movement.
 * [[File:MLM.png]] Marxism-Leninism-Maoism - Absolute maniac.
 * [[File:LeftCom.png]] Left Communism - Stop calling me a liberal (though, I do agree, a socialist movement must always be proletarian in nature).
 * [[File:Parti.png]] Particracy - The US and Soviet Union are identical in their slip into corruption and disfunction thanks to the party system. It must be abolished in order for true democracy to happen.
 * [[File:SecSat.png]] Atheistic Satanism - Nothing but an edgy LARPer, plus it's a bit weird how both anarchists and Nazis seem to love you.
 * [[File:Polpot.png]] Pol Potism - Look, agrarian socialism and autarky are based but I cannot support what you did to your people.
 * [[File:Strans.png]] Stransserism - What in the Goddamn...?

Users

 * [[File:MATTball.png]] UserWiki:Matteel - Way too socially progressive and not left enough on economics.
 * [[File:BeryAbLib.png]] User:BeryAb - Cringe ideology but a based guy. Though at least you've taken the nationalism pill lately.
 * [[File:Panarchy.png]] User:Duck-Citizen - Ancap who is unironically sympathetic to feudalism though putting your cringe ideology aside you do seem like a based guy.
 * [[File:Annilfemale.png]] UserWiki:AshleyHere - Don't know much about you as a person or your ideology but radical nihilism is pretty cringe.
 * [[File:Tony.png]] UserWiki:Tony567 - A step up from your old ideology but that isn't saying much tbh.

Comments
UserWiki:DragonRed=Hello How are you.My page come pls.

- can you add me please

- can you add me?

IvarsBalodis - Done.

Overall pretty based although I am more Internationalist and Progressive than you. But most importantly DON'T LET YOURSELF GET FOOLED BY BIG CLOVER!

- i changed ideology

- I changed mine too

{DragonRed} Are you 25 year ? Ivars
 * AmericanFuturist- Add me?

IvarsBalodis - I'll add you soon - planning on redoing most of the relations section first.

Baconsalad123 - Add me.