UserWiki:DragonRed

About authoritarian secularism
The state; religious budget; science, industry, culture, education, arts and sports should be distributed equally. The state should confiscate the lands and properties of religious institutions and religious foundations. Then the lands and properties should be given to the public. It should leave religious institutions unsourced. religious institutions; it should become more dependent on the state and more controllable by the state. Religious temples should turn into schools, hospitals, workshops and gymnasiums. Religious temples should also be worship. Religious clothing should be free. The state should abolish religious education. People from different religions and sects should worship. Religious schools should be turned into vocational schools.religions; should be taught as history and culture.

In schools; evolution and materialism must be taught...

My Opinion About LGBT
It is normal for people of the same sex to like each other, just as it is normal to like the opposite sex. Heterosexuality and homosexuality/biosexuality are gender orientations. Homosexuality is not perversion or perversion. It is nature's control mechanism. There are cases of homosexuality in animals. True perversion is pedophilia. Whether it's a pedophile of the opposite sex or a gay pedophile; these are perversions. Because one side gets hurt, and that's the kids. We need to protect children from pedophiles. As for trans people, trans people are gay. They do this to change their status and be happier. Trans surgeries are not normal. I am not hostile to trans people. I see trans people as gay. I see this under the umbrella of homosexuality. Trans surgeries are not healthy. Homosexuals are unhappy when they change gender. They harm themselves. The harms of trans surgeries should be explained; We should not allow homosexuals to change their gender. Let's keep their biological sex as is. Let them be at peace with themselves. Transgender is a concept created for homosexuals to make money. We must fight transgender and pedophilia. It can be same-sex marriage. However, homosexual adoption is unnecessary. Homosexual/transgender must be stated on IDs. People have two genders. Male and female, no other gender Men and women determine gender identity. Hermaphrodite is a genetic disorder. It can be corrected with surgery. If she wants to be a woman, a woman; If he wants to be a man, he can be a man. This is normal. Zoophilia is the name of perversion against animals. It should definitely be resisted. As I said, postgenderism is ideology that wants to abolish gender. The genders should stay as they are. postgenderism, transgenderism, pedophile, zoophile should be struggled with. Homosexual and transgender people should not be discriminated against; We must develop them according to their abilities...

Leaders
1.Vladimir Lenin (100/100)- A great job to overthrow the tsarist regime, remove Russia from being an imperialist power that massacres the people and starves the peasants, brings the necessary social changes to Russia that empowers the poor, peasants and women and the New Economy Its policy and almost everything you do for Russia is positive. You paved the way for a great Russia. My strongest regards to you.

2.Kim Il Sung (100/100)- I hope you won the Korean war and killed that US puppet Syngman Rhee. It's based on the Juche concept and it's great that you want the Socialist bloc to unite and support many anti-imperialists like Nyerere and Nasser. You have taken a strong hand to perfectly build North Korea in its material conditions and you truly understand how to run a country.In the 3-volume Marxist Regimes - a World Survey (published by MacMillan), written by the US liberal historian Professor Bruce Cummings; From the 1950s to 1970; He was quoted as saying that Korea's economic growth is 23.5 percent annually. This is truly incredible. You carried it even higher than the 20% annual growth rate achieved in the Soviet Union under Stalin in the 1930s. That's why I carried it above Stalin

3.Joseph Stalin(100/100)- Son. At times I wondered where to put you because on the one hand you mapped out one of the greatest ideologies that saw the liberation of billions of people from Imperialism, Fascism and Colonialism. You had projects on your own that transformed the industrialization that took the rest of Europe 200 years and succeeded in almost two decades, helped to industrialize Eastern Europe, to get rid of Nazi Germany, and your social and cultural policies were very fundamental, but I am from the Turkish Straits crisis, the Baltic' I don't like deportations (although it's understandable that you want to protect them from Hitler), but that's it for your case. But thank you for being an inspiration to Marxism-Leninism and an idol for many socialist movements.

4.Georgi Dimitrov (100/100)- Proletarian Internationalism itself (not Globalism, but the grounded kind), praise also for how you resisted Tito's attempts to imperialize Bulgaria. Your heritage is highly appreciated in Bulgaria today and much of Modern Bulgaria's infrastructures and things they enjoy cannot be without you. Incredibly based.

5.Che Guevara (100/100)- An inspiration for the people of Latin America to fight the murderous dictatorships in Latin America supported by the American imperialists. based. You are the symbol of international liberation, I have great respect for you.

6.Valko Chervenkov (98/100)- Your rapid industrialization, anti-fascist struggle, collectivization and similar policies have contributed a lot to Bulgaria. One of the best in Communist Eastern Europe. Endless respect to you.

7.Zhou Enlai (98/100) - Prime Minister Zhou is the one who contributed the most to make China a respected country. China would have risen much faster if he had seized power instead of Mao.

8.Andrija Hebrang (98/100)- Followed the communist line, played an important role in the industrialization of Yugoslavia, promoted racial unity and ethnic fraternity (until the revisionist son-of-a-bitch Tito stole all your credit) and helped chase the fashoid scum. What can I say other than to hold on? One of the truly real socialists from SFRY.

9.Gheorghe Georgiu Dej (97/100)- Although a Stalinist conservative, you helped Romania get rid of the Nazis, Industrialized Romania and had positive policies like Chervenkov did for Bulgaria and an independent path and almost National for Romania You pressed for the main contact. communism. Other than that, what else can I say? My only problem with you is the Sov-Rom companies thing, otherwise you're perfect. The best of all the early communist leaders of Eastern Europe.

10.Boleslaw Bierut (96/100)- When I read you, I had a hard time deciding where to put you. Lots of internal improvements, as you rapidly industrialized Poland on the one hand and built it after the Nazis had razed it. But lately I really like your Left-Nationalism and ideals. It's very fundamental.

11.Blas Roca Caldera (96/100)- Cuban Zhou Enlai. He helped establish the proper Cuban Socialist structure and bring it to a new height of success. Incredibly irresistible.

12.Kim Jong il (95/100)- In 1994, when you became the Chairman of the State Affairs Commission, aka the Supreme Leader, there were some problems in terms of nutrition throughout North Korea due to natural disasters and sanctions. You have overcome these problems with a basic industrial policy. You developed in the military field. You understood that the army is a vital need to build a solid socialist country. In the 1990s, against the increasing threat of the USA, a breakthrough program was implemented to defend the country in the defense industry. Thus, despite the negative economic and political atmosphere caused by the disintegration of the USSR, you managed to keep DPRK on the path to socialism.

13.Kim Jong Un (94/100)-In October 2015, April 2016 and September 2016, you have grown North Korea very quickly. Indeed, you have achieved a growth rate that is difficult to imagine in capitalist countries. In the imperialist world, huge construction projects that will cost billions, such as Changjon Street, Mirae Scientists Street, Paetusan Youth Power Plant and Science-Technology Complex, have not only progressed, but completed. 2013 you crushed the revisionist, sectarian currents. You are still the hope of socialism

14. Klement Gottwald (90/100)- Good job fighting Nazism in Czechoslovakia, nationalizing key industries and resolving socioeconomic problems between Czechs and Slovaks. The best leader of communist Czechoslovakia, that's for sure.

15.Mirsaid Sultan-Galiev (90/100)- Anti-Imperialism, Anti-Colonialism, National Communism etc. All are deeply grounded and call for the unity of the third world in the struggle for self-determination. It's very fundamental. Stalin made a mistake in liquidating you. However, your advocacy for a more decentralized system is not very good, especially given the situation in the USSR at the time.

16.Miguel Diaz Canel (90/100)- Your technocratic views and your downfall of radical conservatism in the Cuban government are giga-based. Also, good job, keep pushing the Americans and the Gusano puppets in Cuba

17.Wilhelm Pieck (89/100)- Founder of the Socialist DDR and a hero against the Nazis and Social Democrats. Incredibly based. You and Ulbricht have formed the best and most moral German government possible.

18. Walter Ulbricht (89/100)- He had good intentions to develop Germany and fight Nazism well, but giving the order to build the Berlin Wall is a right move. The New Economic System and your other internal policies were very fundamental, I give you this.

19.Fidel Castro (88/100) — the greatest anti-imperialist politician, protector of Cuban independence, I respect you very much. You were the great leader. It's a shame these American neocucks put an embargo on you!

20.Raul Castro (88/100) — same as above but more perfect, because he advocates free market and cultural progressivism He is great. Your economic reforms have opened Cuba to market reforms (lie) while you continue the (based) good work that Fidel did in Cuban.

21..Enver Hodja (87/100)- Your instructions were correct in your early years. Your reforms of literacy, industrialization and the life of the Albanian people are grounded, but your stance on religion is unfounded, and your isolationism (thanks a lot, even if you are forced to Westoids and T*toites) has stagnated. Albanian economy. Also, thanks for helping us beat ROC. If only you weren't overly paranoid and anti-religious, you should be less radical. Oblique manners. My only problem with you is your stance on religion and a bit of isolation, but other than that, your achievements are 100% electrification in just THREE years, building the country's first railroads, great progress in areas like education, health, and eliminating multiple things. diseases and epidemics, how can no one praise your achievements? But then it was very embarrassing to finance the Kosovo Liberation Army (even if you didn't know they were terrorists after death)...

22.Matyas Rakosi (86/100)- While it's good for you to get rid of the Nazi puppet regime of Szalasi, some of your policies, although relatively well-intentioned, have ended in huge failures (thanks anticoms and atlanticoids). While not all of these were failures, some of your industrial policies were very grounded, such as ridding Hungary of the legacy of fascism and poverty. Hell, you are the founder of Socialism in Hungary, it's a shame that revisionists and atlanticoids slander your achievements. We could have had huge successes, unfortunately anticommunications stopped all your progress for Hungary.

23.Nikos Zachariadis (86/100)- Fighting for national liberation from the raging Greek Junta, Nazis and British Imperialists was grounded no matter what, moreover, Left Nationalism is and will be incredibly grounded. Socialist Patriotism too. Fuck the Khrushchevite Revisionists for betraying you.

24.Khorloogjin Choibalsan (85/100)- Modernizing Mongolia, liberating it from the reactionary Beiyang Clique and fighting against the Japanese Imperialists is based on your rapid industrialization, literate development and expanded recognition of Mongolia's independence, but you are very dependent on the Soviets. Purging theocrats is fundamental,

25.Vlado Dapcevic (84/100)- Proletarian internationalism fought the fascists in the second world war and defended proletarian internationalism, hoping to establish real communism instead of what Tito did in his later years. What can I say other than to hold on?

26.Petru Groza (84/100)- Another great man who worked hard to bring socialist Romania to its glory. It's very fundamental.

27. Antonin Zapotocky (84/100)- Sticking to collective leadership, Fighting the Nazis, and following Gottwald's path, though a little more moderate, albeit very grounded.

28.Nexhmije Hoxha (83/100)- She did her best to support her husband's career in making Albania a great socialist republic and you have been very helpful. The only problem is that you supported Alia afterwards. Otherwise, you become an Albanian Peng Liyuan.

29.Ana Pauker (82/100)- Cleaning up liberals, fashoids and succes is incredibly groundbreaking and you've helped Georgiu Dej on many programs. I'm not sure about some of your ruthless behavior (and some tolerance for Kulaks) but other than that, it's fine.

30. Vyacheslav Molotov (81/100)- Supervised collectivization in the USSR and contributed much to the very foundational and successful First Five-Year Plan and is one of the key figures in the USSR who is still firmly opposed to Revisionism. One of the most established politicians of the USSR...

31.Lazar Kaganovich (76/100)- I condemn your failed policies that led to famine (even if the kulaks are more responsible), but you are responsible for overseeing many of the good things that happen in Stalinist Russia, a bit like Molotov, I'll give you on that.

Sun Yat-Sen (100/100) — you You were gigachad and your ideology is very grounded, I respect you. A hero of China and the ancient ruler of True China. Rest in peace Sun.

Li Dazhao(100/100)- A true martyr for the Chinese nation. He founded the Chinese Communist Party, wrote good theories, some of them a little too moderate, and was a nationalist, admiring the Bolshevik revolution while supporting Sun. It's very fundamental. You should have taken over in Mao's place.

Mustafa Kemal Atatürk (100/100) — Long live Mustafa Kemal Pasha! Turkey's greatest ruler, father of ROT, great leader and ideologue, progressive nationalist and social feminist. RIP Kamal.

Sevket Sureyya Aydemir (100/100)- Turkish Nationalism and Marxism, combined with Leninism, if you were in power in Turkey. I can't see any fault with you. Incredibly basic.

Dogan Avcioglu(100/100)- Incredibly grounded, just like above. Turkey's Left Kemalists, such as Liao Zhongkai and Li Dazhao, who defended Atatürk and tried to unite Marxism-Leninism. incredible respect

Yakup Kadri Karaosmanoglu (82/100)- A very moderate but deeply rooted Socialist who opposes the Atlanticist puppet Menderes. Plus, you had some good ideas too, just be more communist and radical.

Deniz Gezmiş(91/100)- The Thalmann/Guevara of Turkey. Unlike Öcalan, Kaypakkaya, he is a true revolutionary and socialist. He is the type of man I respect greatly.

Vedat Nedim Tor(91-100) Same as above but better and more radical.

Wang Dongxing(90-100) He liquidated the Gang of Four, helped end the Cultural Revolution, but criticizes economic reforms and revisionism while also criticizing the Capitalist mentality. You are too loyal to Mao even if you personally oppose the Red Guards, but your kindness makes up for everything.

Vo Nguyen Giap(100/100)- Long live your victory in the war in Dien Bien and it is a symbol of the victory of humanity and humans over evil.

Kwame Nkrumah (96/100)- You have led Ghana on the path of Socialism, Nationalism and anti-imperialism, spearheaded the global struggle against colonialism and overall you are a hero for the liberation of Africa from the clutches of the Imperialists. But you're too mild for my liking.

Farabundo Marti (96/100)- He wanted to help the poor in your country and fought brave wars against the imperialist powers and later the fascist Maximilliano regime. Maximilliano should be killed for you.

Augusto Cesar Sandino (97/100)- It is a very basic idea to want to liberate your country and apply your values ​​to it. Long live the idea of ​​Sandinism! Unfortunately, Ortega does more stupid things in his country

Jose De San Martin (97/100)- Hero of Chile, Peru and Argentina, a great, heroic anti-imperialist who fought against the barbarian Spanish Imperialists for the independence of his country. He is a hero like Argentina's Jose Marti.

Aris Velouchiotis (83/100)- A little too radical, but you are a hero trying to save Greece from fascism and imperialism. A brave man I will always respect.

Pen Sovan(77/100)- You are one of the best people in history. As you move towards the policy of National Communism for Cambodia, you formed an organization that created the People's Republic of Kampuchea, the best government in Cambodia's History, liberating your country from Pol Pot. Even that makes you gigachad, but a little too mild for my liking and still too obedient to Le Duan.

Kaysone Phomvihane (83/100)- Fought the Lao Monarchy, sought to improve the lives of its citizens, and proclaimed Laos a permanent People's Democratic Republic. It looks like Ho Chi Minh and that's a good thing.

Nie Rongzhen (85/100)- responsible for modernizing the PLA, helped Mao develop the Nuclear Weapons program, and is responsible for many modernizations China has gone through. It's very fundamental.

Hugo Chavez (95/100) — you are the great fighter of American neouckservatism and imperialism, I respect you. But your actions caused the crisis in Venezuela. I support you though, don't do it to them. RIP Chavez.

Juan Velasco Alvarado (92/100) - another anti-imperialist, great leader and liberator of Peru from the arms of neocucks. But then they dismissed you and Morales Bermudes destroyed your reforms and actions! RIP Velasco.

Salvador Allende (97/100) — you're democratic enough because socialism is the way to democracy is cool, but neocucks interfered with you! Cybersyn would be great. Rest in peace Salvador Allende.

Gamal Abdel Nasser (90/100) – Egypt's great leader and socialist, but your actions against the Jews were terrible. But I support you against the ziontards and the neocucks!

Muammar Gaddafi (86/100) — one of the oldest anti-imperialists in history, you are the great Libyan leader and African hero. The Neocucks have again eliminated a good leader. With your death, Libya also died.

Thomas Sankara (90/100) — the greatest communist leader, you did many great things, rest in peace. Neocucks spoil everything and always.

Evo Morales (92/100) — Bolivia's greatest leader, you are gigachad and grounded. Neocucks fired you and that's too bad! But you know the Crimean russian, it's a shame. But I support you, don't neocucks.

Mohammad Mosaddegh (88/100) - The great Iranian reformist and Iran would be Ataturk. It is based on secularism, liberal social authoritarianism, reformism and the nationalization of the British oil company and is red-pillared. Your social and economic reforms are great. You've been unfairly knocked down by the Neocucks. You and Atatürk are the two best leaders of the Middle East. RIP, legend.

Habib Bourguiba (88/100) - Tunisian Atatürk liberated Tunisia from the French rule and the reactionary monarchy and made a great contribution to the education and social development of the country.

Lazaro Cardenas (90/100) - Amnesty for nativist, left-nationalist, socauth and political prisoners is based, and so was repealing Calles' law. You are my favorite leader in both Mexico and Latin America. It's a shame the PRI has turned itself into a kleptocratic party.

Lee Kuan-yew (80/100) - This man has made Singapore one of the most prosperous countries in the world without much foreign aid, eradicated poverty and greatly improved the standard of living of the average Singaporean. Authcap is bad but everything you do makes up for it. Although I dislike the way you disperse the strikers and your excessive authoritarianism.

Getuli Vargas (93/100) - Hero of Brazil and a leading fighter against the Axis, FDR ally who greatly improved welfare and workers' rights in Brazil. Leaders like you are exactly what modern Brazil needs. He outlawed the Nazis in Brazil. He was elected Democratic. and returned to the presidency. Your pozivitism is based.

Ahmed Ben Bella (81/100) - The founding father of Algeria, who defeated the genocidal French imperialists, built a robust market socialist economy, created an independent National road and helped the western imperialists cope. However, you have been a vocal supporter of democracy and your foreign policy has been gigachad.

Cemal Gürsel (85/100) - Hero of Turkey and pioneer of Kemalism. This man fought against the Soviet imperialist threat and overthrew Menderes' kakistocratic populist dictatorship and preserved democracy and Kemalism. Supporting Hoxaha is baded

France-Albert René (94/100) - Probably the best African leader ever for making Syechelles a prosperous and free country and resisting American imperialism. You also democratized Syechelles and successfully reformed the ML dictatorship regime. Gorbachev should have learned from you.

National Chief İsmet İnönü (90/100) - You left the path of establishing a free and secular multi-party republic by strengthening Atatürk's one-party state. However, your smart foreign policies saved Turkey from World War II and Nazi occupation. You also protected from Hitler's imperialist ambition. You have made secularism its foundation. It is wealth tax based. You supported China against the Japanese imperialists.

Jozef Pilsudski (84/100) - Despite your authoritarianism and Stratocratic policies, you were a national hero who fought for Polish independence until the end of your life. Even so, though I hate the USSR, you're a little too irredentist for my taste.

Theodore Roosevelt (83/100) - The progressive era was absolutely grounded and you did a great job on trust breaking, social insurance, protectionism and workers' rights. and getting rid of the monopolies of the gilded age that paved the way for America's development was certainly gigachad, but why did you take imperialist actions and colonize the Philippines? This is not what progressives should do. to curse. But despite being imperialist, you are one of the worst and your domestic policies make up for it. I will give you this. Yet you wanted to take the colonies to prevent the British from taking them. This is understandable but also unforgivable.

Bülent Ecevit (85/100) - Good job continuing the CHP's left-of-centre line drawn by İnönü and developing modern Turkish social democratic theory and improving Turkey's economy and social policies. Rescuing the Turkish Cypriots from the racist fascist Greek gangsters is fundamental.

Grover Furr (83/100)- Good to see you debunking many myths about communism and Stalin, one of the few truly educated and intelligent Western academics. People should get to know you more and read you more.

Gennady Zyuganov (80/100)- Your views against the vigilantes and lgbtoid nonsense are hell-based and your nationalism and your wish to return Russia to its former glory under Socialism are curse-based. I wish you to win so that Russia gains its new hope.

Urho Kekkonen (80/100)- Unlike Mannerheim, you are actually a positive figure for Finland, as your foreign policy you did your part as a buffer between the two blocs and kept the peace even though you had support for free signalers. There was also good stability.

Alexander Lukashenko (83/100)- good guy based on your anti-imperialist stance towards Chad and NATO and the EU to solve the problems affecting the former Soviet states in Belarus through your fundamental economy

Eduardo Artes (96/100)- Your social policies similar to Allende's are grounded, your support for the DPRK and your liberal critique of "human rights" and gusanos are hella-based. I prefer you to any Chilean islander. It's very fundamental. Only you won. Reformism is embarrassing, but overall you're very good.

Hu Chunhua (83/100)- Oversaw economic and social developments in both Tibet, Inner Mongolia and later Guangdong, got rid of friendly capitalism, purged corruption, abandoned neoliberalism and capitalism, very fundamental, but you You are very mild.

Simon Bolivar (90/100)- Your Gran Colombia project will come true and you are a heroic son of South America fighting against the filthy Spaniards. However, the occupant Peru is gay.

Jose Carlos Mariategui (90/100)- One of the foremost Anti-Imperialist Marxists of the Americas, no Peruvian has impressed me as much as you. based.

Evo Morales (85/100)- Based. Your reforms denounced neoliberalism and did much to improve the quality of life of the Bolivian people, reduce dependency on the IMF and the world bank, improve the economy, and have policies that are very good for Bolivia. based. Look at the neoliberals and your sheer foundation. Like Castro, you are another champion of Anti-Imperialism. But Bolivia's system must be transformed into a fully Socialist system.

Joao Goulart (82/100)- He had good social programs that lifted the poor out of poverty, increased welfare and improved the health and education systems that were good for all of Brazil, as well as improving the Brazilian economy. based. Unfortunately, American-backed scumbags have to topple you. However, you are a reformist and very moderate who did not change the system, which eventually led to your downfall

Giuseppe Garibaldi (83/100)- Very moderate, but you are Italian Sun Yat Sen. One of the first Socialists who deserved everyone's admiration and fought to reunite Italy. Extremely based

David Alfaro Siqueiros (87/100)- A strong, devoted Marxist-Leninist to the end, and even tried to personally kill Trotsky. Respect to people like you.

Carlos Fonesca (84/100)- Built schools and helped liberate the people of Nicaragua from the genocidal Somoza regime, and did a lot of good to the people of Nicaragua. A shame you had to be killed so early.

Omar Torrijos (80/100)- Redistributed land to peasants, nationalized the Panama Canal, treated your people greatly and your economics are wise. You should rule Panama for eternity. However, you're too moderate.

Gennady Yanayev (78/100)- A patriot and loyal to the cause to the end. My only problem with you is that I can't deliver the blow properly, or you should have taken control. You are the Chen Yun of Russia and I always wished you to prevail against that bastard Gorbachev and his capitalist, kleptocratic western fuck puppet Yeltsin. Rest in peace patriot.

Yang Shangkun (83/100)- Supporting Deng's economic reform isn't bad even if you think that's the only way for China to get out, but otherwise, you're very grounded, especially your liking for NEP, managing Tiananmen and Jiang to be against.

Pham Van Dong (78/100)- A more moderate version of Vietnam's Molotov, followed Bac Ho's legacy to the end and tried to clean up corruption but still very much we are fine.

Chen Yun (85/100)- Great architect of the opening (which is insidious), moderate criticizing Mao's radical policies that harmed China and led China to economic recovery, and later in life conservative who opposed Deng's more radical You had reforms and very fundamental social policies. S

Xi Jinping (84/100)- It's nothing like how the anti-Chinese media portray him. He continued Hu Jintao's technological, economic and social advances, and his One Belt One Road, Moderate Prosperous Society and extreme poverty eradication program is something only gigachads can achieve. Also, I like your firm anti-Western stance. Destroy the West at this point.

Egon Krenz (74/100)- Slightly similar to the East German Xi, but much more moderate and I used to think of you as a Moderate Honeckerist (which is normal, I guess), but you wanted to turn East Germany into a real Market Socialist Hungary like a country under the ML framework and wanted to get rid of the corruption in the GDR. It's a shame that Gorbachev had to ruin everything and sell East Germany to the Westoids and you were a bit too moderate ..

Nguyen Van Linh (73/100)- I don't understand why he was called Vietnamese Gorbachev when Gorbachev was an idiot and a traitor and Van Linh was a genius. Corruption descended on him, and after Le Duan screwed everything up, he fixed the economic problems Vietnam was facing. He is one of the greatest people to ever set foot on earth. However, Doi Moi was a terrible idea, even better than China since it didn't bring too many problems, but still Market Socialism is good. However, you are the least evil of them all.

Wen Jiabao (73/100)- You would be one of the best if it wasn't for your corruption, otherwise your positive policies towards farmers and your contribution to the economy (second man behind Hu) are respected. But you're a little too liberal for my taste.

Nguyen Phu Trong (70/100)- Vietnamese Xi Jinping. Liberal Democracy is and will be a corrupt concept. You are today's best and perfect. In general, the economy is fine, however. you are very good and your limitations are weak too, too  and close with detailed...

Wojcieich Jaruzelski (80/100)-. Although you have declared martial law in Poland, I can somewhat understand why you did it. Western Influence is growing and you wanted to protect Poland from both the West and a Brezhnev invasion as they did to Czechoslovakia. While I don't like your failures to save socialism's reputation in Poland as well as being very allied and cordial with Brezhnev, he's good overall and one of the least bad revisionists despite not fully returning to (better than most Marketsocs),

Erich Honecker (80/100)- Probably one of the greatest people Germany could ever produce. It improved living standards, rejected western neoliberalism to reunite Germany, and had many good policies of industrialization and the like. However, it is bad to fully support Brezhnev, otherwise you are the hope of creating a solid beacon of Socialism in the West and YOU must be the model for the West to follow. But it's also rude to tolerate the corruption of others, as Mielke did, and to be too close to the Brezhnevi otherwise you're fine in my book, although the model of market socialism you're planning is based.

Janos Kadar (70/100) Hungary's living standards have improved. He had some good policies. But even if you opposed Brezhnev's invasion of Czechoslakia, you were too much of a Brezhnev/Khrushchev puppet for my liking. Besides being too moderate, he surrendered to the markets

NETRAL
(69-51)

Deng Xiaoping (65/100)You stopped the events that would cause the collapse of China as well as the Soviet Union. If the Chinese Gorbachev and Yeltsin were the leaders of the country, they would have suffered the same fate as the Soviets. At least you did not allow the country's resources to be plundered like Gorbachev. You helped develop your country. You also prevented the rise of people like Hu Yaobang (Chinese Gorbachev Zhao Ziyang (Chinese Yeltsin). But you did nothing about the factionalism in the party and the massive decline in workers' rights. You supported kakistoric puppets like Najibullah and Le Duan. You supported the Mujahideen in Afghanistan and you invaded Vietnam. You backed tyrants and terrorists like Pol Pot. You supported the person who killed the welfare system like Jiang Zemin

Hate
(50-0)

1.İbrahim Kaypakkaya (5/100)- Terrorist and executive murders against villages. Typical MLM. Not to mention that the Turkish Maoist groups that use violence against ordinary civilians are inspired by you. Besides, who gives you the right to slander Atatürk when Lenin supports him and the Kurds love him? What gives you the right to betray your country? Also, the only salvageable part about you is Socialism, but even then, your "Socialism" will likely be the so-called "Socialists" supporting Joshua Wong in Hong Kong. I have zero respect for traitors like you. No one should support you. No one

2.Abimael Guzman (7/100)- I hate Fujimori and everything about that Neoliberal corrupt dickhead, but you're worse. You have terrorized the Peruvian people with ISIS-level brutality, slaughtering entire towns and bombing innocent civilians. Your ideology is already intimidating enough and your terrorism is making the situation worse. Scumbags like you deserve to endure the worst possible pain in deep hell.

3. Leon Trotsky (7/100)- If you seize power, you will become a Red Neocon. That doesn't make us any different from Western imperialists, does it? Also, you're basically causing more people to die than Stalin because of your Red Neocon ideals. The only good thing about you is to help the Russian revolution and the Civil War, but even then you will turn Russia into a genocidal imperialist state. You definitely deserved the Damn Pick.

4.Sali Berisha (7/100)- Europoid was corrupt as Hell, one-handed crime, had an ultra-capitalist economy that destroyed all Hodja's contributions and caused the Albanian Civil War. He did nothing but plunder the country of his successes during the Hodja era. Of course, Hodja has mistakes, but you are a billion times worse. Albanian Yeltsin. The only reason you're not at Yeltsin's level is because you're not an imperialist like him.

5.Ante Markovic (10/100)- The Gorbachev of Yugoslavia, but somehow even worse. You destroyed everything and all the hopes of saving Yugoslavia.

6.Zhan Videnov (11/100)- It ruined the Bulgarian economy, caused hyperinflation, did nothing against crime, so much so that the common man starved and sold the whole country to the borgeoized powers and the west. Yes, burn in hell forever. Bulgarian Yeltsin

7.Mikhail Gorbachev (12/100)- I will never forgive you until the day I die. The Soviet Union has become a source of pride for the Russian people, a superpower that bury the Western imperialists, brought immense favors to the Russian people from the tsars and the Nazis, you left Afghanistan to the Islamists and destroyed the image of Russia. I'm sorry by causing Yeltzin and you ruined Eastern Europe by letting them be sold to Western capitalists. Fuck you, let history condemn you to the deepest pits of hell. Also tear the bozo, burn bitterly in hell and slow it down and burn forever.

8.Levon Ter-Petrosyan (12/100)- Armenian Yeltsin. You did almost no good for your country, you destroyed your Neoliberal Capitalism, you caused a mass exodus of your own citizens and your country instantly collapsed its economy as a result of capitalist policies and the collapse of the USSR. Do you still think Capitalism is good?

9.Le Duan (18/100)- Good job crushing the Khmer Rouge regime in Cambodia and destroying the illegitimate government in Saigon, Le Duan, but that's the only thing better than you. Apart from that, you are a revisionist who is stupid to run the economy and even the conservative sects of the CPV didn't like you, also why are you a Sinophobic Brezhnev Puppet? You are more or less Vietnamese Brezhnev. You've made some good contributions (like reuniting the country and beating Pol Pot), that's it.

10. Nikita Khrushchev(19/100)- Were the emerging technology and space programs good? Yes. Was it good to improve the lives of the villagers? Yes. Was solving the Suez Crisis effectively good? Yes. Why is this man here, you say? Perhaps because it was responsible for crushing protests in Poland, for violating the national sovereignty of Eastern Europe, for treating Cuba

11.Todor Zhivkov (20/100)- industrial projects and things like that are very good and based on market socialism. At first you increased the education rate. You increased the production rate. The poor eastern european country; You have developed enough to establish your own nuclear power plant. You have eliminated the problem of livelihood. In the first period, you gave importance to Turkish mother tongue education. But then suddenly you became an Ethnic Bulgarian nationalist and approached it chauvinistically. You threw away all the gains.

13.Anastasyon Mikoyan

14.Hu Yaobang

15.Zhao Ziyang

16.Jiang Zhemin

You are the worst leader ever to come from PRC. Extremely corrupt and nepotistic (and later thwarted the Socialist policies of Hu and Xi. Allied with Yeltsin and Milosevic, he destroyed any remaining welfare system in China.

17.Brejnev

18.Sison

19.Shigenobu

20.İmre Nagy

21.Alexandra Dubcek

}}

About socialist countries
Socialism is alive in Cuba and the Democratic People's Republic of Korea. Even though Cuba has invited some capitalists to its country (in order to provide capital inflows) since the Fidel era, socialism continues. Cuba is still proudly flying the Red Flag of socialism right next to the US Imperialists. Korea, on the other hand, has been showing many technological developments recently, and has reached the position of a fully independent and socialist country economically, militarily and politically by applying Juche, which was put forward by Kim Il-Sung as an interpretation of Marxism-Leninism. In both these countries there is no exploitation of surplus value by the bourgeoisie on the Working Class. There is socialism, the system in which the means of production are in the hands of the Working Class State, used jointly and there is no exploitation.

Why doesn't KDHC crash?
Why doesn't KDHC crash? Some people say that as the USSR and other socialist countries in Europe collapsed, DPRK will follow the same path. The USSR did not simply collapse, the Soviet Communist Party and the USSR were destroyed by the deliberate actions of the traitorous Gorbachev. Decrees abolishing the state of the USSR and the CPSU were signed. There was no real collapse of the USSR, but there was a deliberate and deliberate betrayal of socialism by treacherous revisionist leaders who were hand in hand with the imperialists (Margaret Thatcher once called Mikhail Gorbachev a "leader with whom we can do business").

However, DPRK crushed the internal traitors who wanted to sell their country's interests to the imperialists, great powers and revisionists. In 1953, 1956 and 1967 the factional cliques were defeated and liquidated. In 2013, it liquidated the modern sectarian clique.

People's Korea, the land of Juche and Songun, is neither the former USSR nor the former East Germany, Poland or Hungary. Juche socialism is socialism that is perfectly implemented in Korea, which puts the masses of the people at the center. DPRK's socialism is neither an external imposition nor a gift from someone else. Juche socialism is completely different from the socialism that the former Soviet revisionists put into theory. Although the USSR raised the flag of the proletarian revolution during the era of Lenin and Stalin, it became a victim of modern revisionism in the era of Khrushchev and cooperated with the US imperialism. Abandoning revolutionary principles in the 1950s and 1960s, the USSR liquidated the dictatorship of the proletariat and declared itself the state of the whole people, giving up the class struggle against the enemies of socialism. North Korea, led by President Kim Il Sung, preserved revolutionary principles and opposed modern revisionism. In his 1967 article titled "On the Transition Period from Capitalism to Socialism and the Question of the Dictatorship of the Proletariat", President Kim Il Sung fully emphasized the necessity of the dictatorship of the proletariat and opposed the counter-revolutionary idea of ​​the "state of the whole people".

Since the economic system in DPRK is based on socialist ownership of the means of production, there is no social inequality. There are no social contradictions and racial discrimination. There is no unemployment in North Korea, there is no deduction in salaries, and indirect - direct taxation was abolished in 1974. There is no stagnation in DPRK as in the USSR in the late 1970s and 1980s. In the 1950s, the economic growth rate of NKR had reached 40% in one year.

The secret of why NRW will never collapse is the Juche Idea, the Songun Idea and the three pillars of the idea of ​​self-development first. In 1977, respected British social scientist Dr. Malcolm Caldwell wrote: "It is clear that South Korea, deprived of huge loans, US military support, and integration into the international capitalist economy, will collapse, whereas the North Korea that remains attached to the Juche can remain independent forever" (Malcolm Caldwell "The Wealth of Some Nations" Zed Press 1977).

Dprk Truth
We will make a general assessment about DPRK in the light of the information I have scanned completely from researches. If we look at the education data, the literacy rate is 100%. [2] Although this may seem like a simple data, there are still countries around the world that cannot reach it. The number of students per teacher is 20. The average in the world is around 24. [3] The primary school completion rate of students is around 97%. [4] Life expectancy is around 72 years. Child or infant mortality rate under the age of 5 is 19 per thousand according to 2017 data. The world average is around 39.1 per thousand according to 2017 data. [5] The infant mortality rate is 14 per thousand. The world average is 29 per thousand. [6] The number of patient beds per thousand people is 13.2, and the world average is around 2. [7] The death rate due to poor water and sanitation is 1.4 per 100 thousand, and the world average is 11.8. [8] The use of advanced water resources is 98.9%. [9] The vaccination rate for DPT, measles, HeB3 is 97%, 99% and 97%, respectively. [10] The rate of women receiving prenatal care is 100%. The world average is 86%. [11th] Unemployment rate is around 3.3%.[12] Women constitute 47.6% of the total workforce. [13] In transportation, it is a developed country in terms of railway. It is foreseen that there is a railway line of over 6000 km in total. Pyonyang subway has the title of the deepest subway in the world and an average of 500 thousand people are transported daily. [14] In addition, it is one of the countries with the lowest murder rate of 4 per 100 thousand. [15]

How did the Soviets collapse?
In the socialist society system that used to exist in the Soviet Union, production was organized in a planned manner through detailed directives sent to enterprises by the central state apparatus according to the current economic plan:

" In the case of socialized production…society distributes labor-power and means of production to different branches of production”.

(K. Marx: "Capital", Vol. 2; London; 1974; p.362).

" Our plans are not forecasting plans, they are directive plans that bind governing bodies and determine the direction of our future economic development across the country".

(JV Stalin: Political Report of the Central Committee to the 15th Congress of the CPSU (B), in: "Works", Vol. 10; Moscow; 1954; p.335).

According to contemporary Soviet propagandists, the purpose of the "economic reform" initiated in 1965 was to "improve" and "consolidate" -- even "perfect" central economic planning:

A set of measures is envisaged to raise the scientific standards of state planning of the economy ".

(AN Kosygin: "On Improving Industrial Management, Perfecting Planning in Industrial Production and Improving Economic Incentives", in: "Izvestia" (News), September 28, 1965 by ME Sharpe (Ed.): "Planning, Profit and Incentive in the USSR", Vol. 2; New York; 1966; p.15).

" Economic changes mean improvement of national economic planning ... Reform reinforces central planning". (Edit: "Economic Policy and Work for Communism", "Pravda" (Truth), January 14, 1966, in: "Soviet Economic Reform: Main Features and Aims"; Moscow; 1967; p.9).

In fact, as will be shown, central economic planning as it existed under socialism has been excluded from the Soviet economy since the "economic reform"

After the murder of Joseph Stalin (on 5 March 1953), Khrushchev-Brezhnev-Mikoyan-Suslov etc. in 1953. History of the Soviet Union: The period of the reactionary process of the destruction of socialism-communism and the progressive restoration of capitalism - the implementation of the most comprehensive capitalist economic reform (Plenum in September 1965) - was completed in the mid-60s. After the assassination of Stalin, the Dictatorship of the Proletariat was overthrown.

Mao de Zedong Truth
Suffice it to conclude that Mao Tse-tung was not a Marxist-Leninist, but a progressive revolutionary democrat who for a long time remained at the head of the Chinese Communist Party and played an important role in China's victory. Chinese democratic anti-imperialist revolution. Within China, in the party ranks, among the people, and outside of China—he gained a reputation as a great Marxist-Leninist—he appeared to be a communist himself, a Marxist-Leninist dialectician. But this was not so. He was an eclectic who combined some elements of Marxist dialectics with idealism, bourgeois and revisionist philosophy, even ancient Chinese philosophy.

Mao de Zedong Thought
Mao Tsetung presented his opportunist attitude towards the bourgeoisie as a creative application of Lenin's New Economic Policy (NEP) teachings. However, there is a fundamental difference between Lenin's teachings and Mao Tsetung's understanding of allowing unlimited capitalist production and maintaining bourgeois relations in socialism. Lenin admits that the NEP was a step back that allowed elements of capitalism to flourish for a certain period of time, but he stresses that:

“…there is nothing dangerous in this for the proletarian state, as long as the proletariat firmly holds political power, firmly holds transport and large industry”. (Lenin)

In fact, neither the political power of the proletariat in China nor the large industry was in its hands when Mao Tse-tung defended them, neither in 1949 nor in 1956.

Moreover, Lenin saw the NEP not as a universal law of socialist construction, but as a temporary measure imposed by the concrete conditions of Russia at that time devastated by the long civil war. And the fact is that a year after the proclamation of the NEP, Lenin emphasized the end of the retreat and chanted the slogan of preparing for the attack on private capital in the economy. Whereas, the period of preservation of capitalist production in China was predicted to last almost indefinitely. According to Mao Tse-tung, the order established after the liberation in China was supposed to be a bourgeois-democratic order, and the Chinese Communist Party had to appear in power. Such is the "thought of Mao Tse-tung".

Vietnam Laos Truth
Uncle Ho was killed in battle in 1969. This event was also a great loss for the Vietnam Revolution.

As a result;

The People's Democratic Revolution of Vietnam succeeded. There is no obstacle to the economic leap to socialism. General Vo Nguyen Giap, together with the Vietnamese People he led, gave an unforgettable slap to the Japanese, French and US Imperialist Bandits. They still have not recovered from its influence. These jackals attacked a less populated and underdeveloped country with all their technological weapons, but in the end, they were defeated and defeated. In 1975, the country was renamed the Socialist Republic of Vietnam. In 1976, the merger took place. The leaders of the revolution established Proletarian Democracy and a centrally planned socialist economy. However, the work does not end here. The continuity of socialism should be ensured by giving theoretical-ideological education to future generations. This is what our Vietnamese comrades overlooked or failed to do. Marxism-Leninism was not instilled in the new generation following the generation that carried out the revolution in Vietnam, and a socialist human being was not created. This negativity inevitably led to the loss of socialism.

General Giap watched with sadness this fading away of Vietnamese socialism. Unlike most revolutionary leaders in the eastern countries (which should be appreciated), he asked for his retirement on time, and was unwilling to stay in power until his death. Giap retired from politics and the military and lived to be 102. During his lifetime, Giap was opposed to this trend in Vietnam, to the capitalist path. Vietnam socialism, which was built with all kinds of pain and difficulties, has now entered the Finance-Capitalist path. Worse, Vietnam has not even succeeded in protecting its independence against the US Imperialists.

From 1987 onwards, the US Imperialists did all kinds of demons to suppress the Vietnamese Revolution, when US President Reagan sent his special envoy to Vietnam. It is a pity that these treacherous policies yielded results. In 1994-95, the US lifted the embargo on Vietnam and the two countries reopened their embassies. In 2000, Clinton came to Vietnam and signed the "Bilateral Trade Agreement". In 2013, Obama and Sang signed the "US-Vietnam Comprehensive Partnership" document. In 2014-16, the arms embargo was lifted. Thus, the counter-revolution progressed rapidly in Vietnam, which was weakened after the collapse of the Socialist Camp.

Laos and Vietnam were once socialist countries. However, as a result of the wrong or incomplete policies followed, it has turned into only a socialist country such as the People's Republic of China.

Is DPRK Really Friendly with China and Russia?
China should no longer try to test the limits of Korea's patience, but should face the situation and make an appropriate strategic choice. China better reflect on the dire consequences of its reckless move to cut the pillar of DPRK-China relations.” — Kim Chol, Central Committee of the Workers' Party of Korea Rodong Sinmun May 3, 2017

The Democratic People's Republic of Korea has undergone several rounds of UN Security Council, culminating in the extremely harsh and brutal UNSC Resolution 2371, which not only imposed sanctions by the United States and some Western countries, but also imposed very severe restrictions on Korea's foreign economic activities in order to suffocate its economy and collapse the socialist system. (UNSC) had to face the sanction as well. The so-called allies of Korea, the Russian Federation and the People's Republic of China, voted for this resolution and have voted for most, if not all, of the UNSC sanctions resolutions against the Democratic People's Republic of Korea since 2006.

Basically, Russia and China violated Korean sovereignty by supporting UNSC sanctions against DPRK and assisted imperialist attempts to isolate socialist Korea.

Some still continue to portray the non-socialist Russian Federation and the modern-revisionist PRC as "best friends" and "close allies" of socialist Korea. Some of this type even slanderously portray Korea as the work of or dependent on the former Soviet Union and China, completely ignoring the fact that Korea is an independent, Juche-based socialist country.

DPRK Struggle with Revisionism
While both DPRK and PRC strongly opposed the shift to revisionism in the USSR, DPRK opposed modern-revisionism from a completely independent, Juche-based perspective. It is true that the positions of the PRC and Korea overlapped for a while. However, the Democratic People's Republic of Korea opposed the division in the international communist movement and avoided drifting towards extreme leftism in the PRC. Based on the unity of one heart, Korea did not allow itself to be drawn into the ultra-leftist 'Cultural Revolution' that consumed China from the inside in the 1960s. In addition, Comrade Kim Il Sung, President, condemned China's left opportunism with the following words:

“The left opportunists failed to take into account the changing conditions and dogmatically repeated the propositions of Marxism-Leninism a hundred years ago and called it anti-revisionism; they led people to extremist actions under super revolutionary slogans. They sever the party from the masses, divide the revolutionary forces and prevent an intense attack against the archenemy. Allowed left opportunism to grow, it can become as dangerous as modern revisionism. Without fighting left opportunism, it is not possible to unite the anti-imperialist forces to wage a successful struggle against imperialism, nor is it possible to successfully combat modern revisionism.

Later, the PRC moved to the right in the 1970s and 1980s, declaring "reform" and "opening up". This was a rather incomprehensible and bizarre situation and has cost China many friends and supporters around the world, but the purpose of this article is not to discuss why "reform" and "opening up" took place or their effects. Comrade Kim Il Sung, President, emphasized that NKR should "always live in its own way, without any illusions about the revisionist and reformist policies pursued in some countries".

The great leader President KIM IL SUNG's successor Comrade Kim Jong Il in response to those who think that the Democratic People's Republic of Korea will adopt Chinese-style "reform" and "opening up", said, “DO NOT EXPECT CHANGE FROM ME!” said. He continued: “We must build a great, prosperous and strong country under the banner of self-confidence (...) The "restructuring" and "opening up" advertised by the imperialists should never fascinate us. "Reconstruction" and "opening up" is the road to national destruction. We should not tolerate them in the slightest.”

Comments

 * - Mao’s view on Ataturk: Even though the petty Kemalist dictatorship of the bourgeoisie did emerge in Turkey after the first imperialist world war and the October Revolution owing to certain spe- cific conditions (the bourgeoisie’s success in repelling Greek aggression and the weak- ness of the proletariat), there can be no second Turkey, much less a ‘Turkey’ with a population of 450 million, after World War II and the accomplishment of socialist con- struction in the Soviet Union. In the specific conditions of China (the flabbiness of the bourgeoisie with its proneness to conciliation and the strength of the proletariat with its revolutionary thoroughness), things just never work out so easily as in Turkey. Did not some members of the Chinese bourgeoisie clamour for Kemalism after the First Great Revolution failed in 1927. But where is China’s Kemal And where are China’s bour- geois dictatorship and capitalist society. Besides, even Kemalist Turkey eventually had to throw herself into the arms of Anglo-French imperialism, becoming more and more of a semi-colony and part of the reactionary imperialist world.’