UserWiki:KaiserKlausMouse

[[File:Trumpism.png]]2016-2017 Trumpism[[File:Trumpism.png]]
Initially, KaiserKlausMouse was a Trump supporter, mostly because he thought Donald Trump was "funny."

[[File:Commie.png]]2017-2018 Communism[[File:Commie.png]]
After KaiserKlausMouse started researching Communism in 2017, he came to the conclusion that Marxism was the best ideology as it offers financial equality for all.

2018-2020 [[File:Dsa.png]] Democratic Socialism/Social Democracy [[File:Socdem.png]]
After around a year and a half of being a communist, KaiserKlausMouse slowly de-radicalized, and ended up in a sort of limbo state in which he at times was a democratic socialist and then the next day he was a social democrat.

[[File:Consocf.png]] 2020-2022 Conservative Socialism[[File:Consocf.png]]
During quarantine, KaiserKlausMouse researched German nationalism and the German Empire. Around October 2020 is when KaiserKlausMouse's political beliefs during the beginning of his activity on this site were formed.

[[File:Monsynd.png]] 2022-2022 Integral Monarcho-Syndicalism [[File:ChiRhoInt1.png]]
After some reflection and research, I have to say that Syndicalism is a more viable ideology, which helps workers more than a  State Socialist economy, which as history has shown, leads to dictatorships which don't truly care about the worker. I've also looked into Integralism, and I think it is needed, to help stop the downfall of society.

[[File:Indiv.png]] The day of enlightenment [[File:Absurd.png]]
On April 1st, 2022, I had a revalation, why do people tell me what to do? It's obviously because they are poopoo stinky 1984. I know this now. Please forgive me for telling people what to do. Just let people enjoy things

[[File:Unitary.png]] How the Government Should be Run [[File:Unitary.png]]
Lol no, people should just enjoy things.

[[File:Prog.png]] Social Philosophy [[File:Awaj.png]]
F-f*ck youuuu mom, I don't have to do anything1!! Hmph!

Economic Philosophy
I should just play on my xbox all day, working is for losers

[[File:Georgist.png]] Housing Policy [[File:Timocracy.png]]
EVeryone should just get a house ez

[[File:WelfChauvin.png]] Welfare and Social-economic Policies [[File:Social_corpratism.png]]
Give it to people if they enjoy it I guess, but gubrnmen is stinky so not sure but Ill find a way

[[File:Econat.png]] Environment Policy [[File:Climate_Dictatorship.png]]
Like, I enjoy trees, but not sure about : So Imma skip this one

[[File:Transh.png]] Technology [[File:Agrnac.png]]
If people want to be terminator, who am I to stop them?

[[File:Awaj.png]] Immigration Policy [[File:Awaj.png]]
Anarchism knows know brodors1

[[File:Mil.png]]Foreign and Defense Policy[[File:Mil.png]]
If people want to join the military, let them, but also wars stop people from enjoying things so Imma also skip this one

[[File:Ethno.png]] [[File:Ethplur.png]] Ethnic Viewpoint [[File:Intercult.png]] [[File:Multicult.png]]
If I kill everyone without my exact genetic makeup, then I will be able to enjoy things without any issues, yipee, I've got my solution!!

[[File:Pac.png]] Pacifism or Militarism? [[File:Mil.png]]
K I L L E V E R Y O N E

[[File:Indiv.png]] Individualism or Collectivism? [[File:Col.png]]
LET PEOPLE ENJOY THINGS!!!!!!11111111!1!1

In General
In general, let people enjoy things

[[File:Illeg.png]] Crime [[File:PolState.png]]
Crime is okay I guess unless it stops people from enjoying things

[[File:Civlibert.png]] Freedom of Speech [[File:Libertarian_Paternalism.png]]
I should be able to ruin someone's life for the funzees

[[File:GRights.png]] Gun Rights [[File:GRights.png]]
EVeryone should onwn a gun, its very enjoyable

[[File:SJW.png]] LGBT [[File:SJW.png]]
Let people enjoy things

[[File:Fem.png]] Abortion [[File:Fem.png]]
LET PEOPLE ENJOY THINGS

[[File:Satan.png]] Prostitution [[File:Satan.png]]
LETE EPOPLE ENJOSY THINGS!

[[File:Acidcomf.png]] Drug use [[File:Acidcomf.png]]
F-F*CK YOU GRAMPA, I CAN TAKE AS MANY DRUGZ AS I LIKE< WHAT ARE YOU GONNA DO ABOUT IT? AHAHAHAHA

[[File:Biologist.png]] Animal Rights [[File:Murderthemall
I LOVE VIVVISECTIONS

How to draw
I don't care, you enjoy how you want to do it

Political Timeline
->->->->->

Comments

 * Write comments here for the time being please. :)

TolkienIRL - Add me? Yugopart - how are scientists demons?
 * Sometime today
 * Not all scientists, I suppose chemists are not as bad, but I say they most of them are demons because they commit utterly horrific crimes comparable to unit 731 in the vague pursuit of "science." If you saw what they do you'd know what I mean.

you are german. Question to you. What did you think of East Germany and Erich Honecker? Also, what do you think about SPD?


 * I don't like East Germany, I've been asked this question before back when we had real comments, but East Germany was a sad puppet of the Soviet Union and despite Honecker's best efforts, East Germany still was in economic ruin. Not to mention that he fought tooth and nail against reunification and Gorbachev's reforms.

NazBolGANG12 Add me yugo - you will become femboy
 * Not in a million years buckaroo.

DragonRed :Why don't you call yourself an eco-conservative monarchist-socialist?KaiserKlausMouse


 * That's what I am, but keep in mind that at the beginning, I basically just tried to copy MapofFish, and he only had two words in his ideology, an adjective and a noun, so that's what I did.

M99:Yo can we write on dc a lil maybe add me if ya want bro m99%#2420 ^^


 * I sent a friend request.

DragonRed  : Come my page Kaiser

SomeCrusader1224 - Based and HOI4 pilled.


 * Indeed

DragonRed How is my ideology write something about me

The Iced- Add me please.

- update relations with me?

- I'm still an egoist, it's in my beliefs section.

Hood856: Add me?

- "LordCompost dares to say that Kaiser, Ukraiana and Berry are egoists. Indeed, he is content here with saying nothing more than if he had said Kaier does absolutely nothing but the Kaiserian, Ukrainia does nothing but the Ukraianian, and Berry does nothing but the Berrian; but he has given them an infamous label.

Does Kaiser live in a world other than his own? Does he perhaps live in Ukraiana’s world, in Berry’s world, in LordCompost’s world? Since Kaiser lives in this world, since it surrounds him, isn’t it the world that is felt, seen, thought by him, i.e., in a Kaiserian way? He doesn’t just live in the middle of it, but is himself its middle; he is the center of his world. And like Kaiser, no one lives in any other world than his own, and like Kaiser, everyone is the center of his own world. World is only what he himself is not, but what belongs to him, is in a relationship with him, exists for him." Max LordCompost


 * Might have to do that for April Fools lol.

- You're gonna be yourself on April Fools? Aren't you yourself all the time... Oh wait you don't know what the quote even said. Lol. Ohwell you'll understand Stirner properly one day.


 * Just because I exist, that doesn't mean that I'm automatically an Egoist. If that is not what you meant then please explain.

- Maybe not an egoist in your terms - as in someone who is isolated, has reckless abandone and makes other people's lives worse. But yes you are an egoist because you exist. You are yourself and look out for yourself. Not in a psychological egoist sense either of every action is egoistic. But in a you do you sort of fashion and there is nothing you do that isn't from you or towards you. You build yourself in each instance - you act from your perspective. That doesn't mean you can't help others or even put yourself in a worse spot for others - because that is what you do.

The man who loves his family and helps them is no less interested in his wants (family) then the loner who hates others. They both act towards their interests - their self-interests. They are self-interested beings.


 * That an interesting viewpoint, but I still am not a political egoist.

- Well neither am I, nor was Stirner we are both anti-political. perhaps Totalitarian figures are - which would put you closer than me.

"Socialism is incompatible with individualism" lol this couldn't be any wronger. See : Mikhail Bakunin, Oscar Wilde, Peter Kropotkin, Emma Goldman, Lysander Spooner, Benjamin R. Tucker and ect ect who were not only socialists, but individualists or at the minimum individualistic. Not only that, "recognizing capitalism as a necessary evil" debunks the claim that You are a socialist wich makes that earlier claim very hypocritical. Sorry not sorry.


 * I'm not even "socialist" anymore. But yes, you're right, socialism isn't incompatible with individualism. I'm just too lazy to redo my ENTIRE userpage. But I might do it sometime today or tommorow.


 * - very well then


 * - What so what are you then? Corporatist? or Capitalist?


 * - National syndicalist/social corporatist

- Double Egoist wammie. "So what stops Tim from coming to my house and stabbing me in my sleep?" - What stops Tim coming to my house and stabbing me in my sleep now with a government? You may say laws deter people but then Anarchism has laws or atleast customs and community management. But even with determent, crime and more specifically murder still happens. So kind of a shit point.


 * "crime still happens," well there's two key differences, 1. Having laws against crime lowers the chance that people will do that crime. That's obvious, so just having at least a minarchist government deters crime. Yeah murders still happen, but it goes without saying that it happens a lot less when people are held accountable. 2. Anarchists have laws or customs, doesn't that destroy the whole purpose of anarchism, let alone egoism, where literally everything is okay if it "pleases your ego?" And even if they did, you're describing ochlocracy, where the mob decides who is punished and is not.


 * - 1. Yes it does lower crime - I wouldn’t have statistics to dispute it nor would I have any to prove it, but common sense would agree with you. But again only a crime if you make the law. 2. Anarchism is no rulers not no laws - however Egoism is not Anarchism I was wasn’t arguing on Egoist lines - you just happen to have assumed probably because I am an egoist but I could just as easily argue in favour of Marxism or Fascism. If you think having customs is anti-anarchist then you have very little information regarding anarchism in which case your original comment has no ground at all which was originally my purpose in writing the comment, to prove or atleast work out that you don’t actually know what anarchism as a political ideology is- even if I am not an anarchist.  3. Please don’t use the word ego in relation to Stirner’s egoism - it makes no sense because he never used the word, as I said before Stirner says an egoist is a being that is unique and acts so, it is a self-creator and does its thing. They are not the randian selfish man.  4. I happen to be a moral nihilist so I can’t say that murder is wrong because I can’t ever get at the truth value beyond my individual perspective which sees Murder as bad. When someone says “x is wrong” they can only ever mean “x is bad” or “I don’t like x”. Moral statements lack truth values - unless someone for example a religious person gets at objective truth from outside individual perspective (God) but then that unfalsifiable claim that god exists runs into the unfalsifiable claim that god doesn’t exist and then the argument can’t go any further.


 * Alright, thanks for clarifying that anarchism is not without rules just without rulers. But wtf you're not anarchist. I should just read the book because from what I've heard, Egoism is anarchist, and says that everyone should be able to do whatever they want to because "objective morality" doesn't exist.


 * - I would recommend reading it, the goal of Stirner's work was never to justify doing whatever one wants because no morality but rather to bring the Hegelian Philosophy into the light of day - to reach Hegel's absolute spirit that knows itself and its world, and has complete self-consciousness of both - thereby 'The Unique' (itself) and 'Its Property' (It's world). Stirner's goal was to remove the illusions of Fixed ideas and uninterestedness (especially in regard to a religious and then humanist appeal to action), not the usefulness or even practice of moral action, or any action. But on the Anarchist thing, I could perhaps call myself one, but it would only ever be a Philosophical Anarchism (thereby, a theoritical critique of the state and authority and not a political goal, nor an appeal to the historical socialist political anarchism). Even then, I don't really want to box myself into an ideology and its stipulations.

Remove the monarchy. Make it a militaristic republic instead. Make the chiefs of staff president.

Yelvia - Oh, from what I can see you're more like a National Syndicalism, Why did that change happen?


 * Because state socialism is incompatible with a lot of my other ideologes to the point that it really wasn't state socialism, it kinda felt like lying. Also, I think workers should have a say in how their workplace is run, and not just be managed by some authoritarian ruler that has never done any real labour.

- Oh I understand that

- You know kaiser, I'm actually kinda proud of you that you are finally coming out as a fascist, I now find myself hating you less because atleast you're honest about it now


 * I still don't really like calling myself that but I know you love to twist my words and misconstrue things so you think whatever makes you happy.




 * I'm re-working my page so when I get to my relations part I'll add you :)


 * Danke :)

Firebender12345: Can you add me when you re-work your page :)? Firebender12345 ok cool :)
 * Yes, You are ultra based
 * Thanks, you are very ultra based too
 * I'm not going to be super active like I used to anymore because I have tennis now. But I will still be on on the weekends and in my spare time after school.

- Quite based, I'll add you and you add me when you have need

Anonymous21 - Why don't I have permission to make a page? Anonymous21 - Very Cringe. Just fascist. DragonRed
 * - Have you confirmed your account to your email
 * Yes.
 * Can u add me?
 * Maybe sometime later today.
 * Ok
 * [[File:FabiusEagle.png]] PaleoFabius: Kaiser. Apologies but your kind of being sorta just being dramatic. Influence means stuff that has Influenced my ideology. Only reason Maoism and Futurism were there was in terms of some outlook. Christ Kaiser.
 * Thanks for clarifying, also thanks for taking back your polytheistic outlook.

You don't look bad to the fascists. State capitalism is social corporatism and I advocate national unionism, the cultural left version. I am your secular republican version. How is my ideology?


 * i added you could you add me back when you get a chance :)

- Add me please.

- Changed my ideology but you'll probably still find it rather cringe

Yugo - finally you admit you aren't socialist. also >admires nelson mandela >admires ian smith bruh
 * I was socialist, but I'm not anymore. Also Ian Smith praised Nelson Mandela.

Silas how is disliking an ideology that has been tried various times and continually hasn't worked "teenage rebellionism"? SuddenWriter - Add?
 * Authoritarianism works, and is the only way how true change can be made without drastic measures. Because teenagers don't like being told what to do because "Muh individuality," and "you can't tell me whut to do!111!!" And would rather die than simply follow rules. Anti-Authoritarianism is just teenager rebellionism for people that haven't grown out of it yet. Not saying that all authoritarian regimes are bad, but to say that authoritarianism as an ideology has "failed" is childish.
 * Perhaps later