UserWiki:ShadowRaiden

I have returned, and will redevelop my userpage later. -

Hello, I’m GeneralGanyu!

Economics
Both free-market capitalism and  state socialism are death traps. The former for being based on greed and the latter for mass collectivization.

I lean more towards market economics, mainly that of social market economics. I believe that the market can bring innovation and development, although it must be regulated in order to benefit the many and to protect consumers, in addition to not forcing people to buy something for more than it’s actually worth.

That being said though, planning will still exist, mainly on a decentralized scale, although the central government will also play a role. This is for 2 reasons: 1. Not everything, especially big businesses, major industries, and public transportation, can be left to the private sector, and 2. It’s decentralized so if a failure occurs, it effects less of the country.

I support the guild system, as a way of class collaboration and a group of workers (and the owners) to make demands if something is insufficient. That being said though I can understand some negatives that can come out of such, mainly said guilds or unions becoming self serving (but lets face it the upper class is worse in most if not all regards)

I oppose free trade and autarky. For me, protectionism is needed, with low tariffs as well.

There will be public options for healthcare and education, however, private options may exist ad well, provided that they’re covered by the state. That being said though there are criteria that all must follow (ex: hospitals can’t give abortions and must sell prescription drugs at a set price, and schools must follow a certain curriculum), and they must be more co-operative than competitive because in the end the goal is to help and teach our people.

Energy will be public, and private companies are not allowed to profit off of energy supply. I aim to 1. Make energy more widespread and accessible, and 2. Begin a switch to green energy, that all energy companies are required to take part in.

There would be a large amount of social programs for two reasons: 1: to help those struggling, and 2: to develop society. Taxpayer dollars shall go to infrastructure, housing, healthcare, education, and green energy. This is for the betterment and advancement of the nation and society as a whole.

As for the welfare state, as Vladimir Lenin stated, “one who does not work, neither shall he eat.” Thus, welfare will be restricted to either the disabled or lower class citizens with a job. Although it is certainly possible that some won’t receive such benefits, it’s most certainly better than the alternative, which is people leeching off of the welfare system.

However, private charities will still exist and will even be encouraged, but regulations will be put in place to ensure that said charities are legitimate.

The minimum wage should depend on what sector you’re working in, though generally speaking it should be a living wage.

I support credit unions as a way of communitarianism and helping each other out in times of need, in addition to avoiding further monopolies, and to benefit the participant, and not just the banker, although the banker may still take part in it provided he isn’t being self serving. They would be organized on local levels, although there would be a national bank

Social
To me, “progressive” and “conservative” are arbitrary terms, and it all depends on material condition. For example, I’d be considered culturally right for the standards of the west, and  culturally left for the standards of the third world, although I take aspects from both regardless.

I’ve had people say that it conserves nothing - that it’s an excuse to be hateful but call yourself progressive - to that I say, you know nothing about material conditions

Regarding race, I believe that all races should be equal under the law, and believe that both racial guilt and supremacy are bad.

For example, whites founded the American nation and they had better technology and were stronger overall, and should be hailed for that (however I believe that it has to do with societal reasons rather than racial ones). That being said though I have no issues with other races and see them as equal, but the point of whites being the founders still stands and I most certainly oppose white guilt (or any kind of guilt for that matter), and believe we should look towards the future instead of being stuck in the past in terms of events. For me, reparations and guilt are completely unfeasible, and that actions (primarily improving the lives of blacks and natives by improving infrastructure and living conditions) is more important, as actions speak more than words or money. Also I’d say the same for any other country, regardless of race, that said race are the founders of the nation. But that aside, people should be seen not for their color of their skin, but for the content of their character.

For religion, I believe in the freedom of religious practice, and support a secular government, however parts of religion should serve as a base guideline of what’s right and wrong

Abortion is an evil act that takes away a baby’s right to live. At best it takes away someone who could bring so much potential all for hedonistic pleasure. It should be illegal to abort unless a danger would be posed to the mother from giving birth. As for cases of rape/incest, while it is an evil action that nobody deserves to experience, the sin of the father does not excuse killing the baby. Raising the baby in itself can be a healing process in itself. Bare minimum, put it up for adoption. Even then they make up for a very small amount of abortion cases. Otherwise it’s either ableism (aborting because of disability) or because of hedonistic pleasure. If you don’t want a kid then don’t have sex. The state would provide support for mothers and there would be a paid leave from anywhere lasting from 14 to 20 weeks

While I see homosexuality as something that isn’t a choice, and won’t hate one for that provided that said person acts like the average person, it still should be kept a private topic. I still believe that marriage is between a man and a woman, and that children must have a mother figure and a father figure, and can’t be absent from either of them. In addition I also oppose sexual pride of any type and oppose it’s presence in schooling

Porn, prostitution, and other forms of sex “work” are degenerate, detrimental elements of society, and ought to be suppressed. First I’d implement programs to make it so less people need to resort to such. The ban will then kill those vile aspects of society altogether.

Men and women play their roles in society, and thus must be given equal rights. For example, they must be equal pay, equal treatment by officials, etc.

Multiculturalism focuses too much on different identities and not enough on one, single, national identity and common values. However I’m not against other cultures existing in the nation, but they must know and follow the national culture and put that first. I consider myself an interculturalist in that regard, although I lean more towards monoculturalism. If you live in a nation you must uphold it’s culture and put said nation first and foremost. Immigrants must learn the national culture and put it first, but may still practice their native one (but if negative elements such as honor killings, for instance, exist, they must be forgotten). In the case of a diverse country, I believe that there must be a common language and national identity, in addition to at least some common values and integrating some from each big culture in the nation. Things like festivals and holidays from each big culture in such diverse countries should be events for everyone in the country to celebrate and get around on

Government
I believe in a republic, however, I’ll allow a figurehead monarchy to exist under the following 4 conditions:

1: It is necessary for the nation’s traditions

2: It is wanted by a majority of the population

3: Said monarch can not be corrupt. Otherwise the monarch will be forcefully removed from the government

4: Said monarch can’t previously be a detrimental force to the nation

However, said monarch also has to pay fair share of taxes and take part in governmental affairs and decision making, so the monarch can’t be a glorified celebrity and actually has to play a role in governing the nation.

I support local decision making in which those living in a particular area can take part in direct democratic decision making on local levels

Foreign
The nation is your foundation, it holds your worth, it brings community, union, values, culture, and uniqueness, and likewise one has a duty to love it. To be anti-nationalist is an act of selfishness, as it is hatred or disregard for your people and values. If you don’t like how your nation is, you should fight to reshape it for the better instead of hating it as a whole. To destroy the nation is to destroy what it brings, and refusal to help it in times of crisis is the highest level of treason.

User Test
If you partly agree, then 0.5 points

1: I oppose both modern western progressivism and reactionarism/third world conservatism (if you support either of them, no points)

2; I am an environmentalist

3: I am moderate on the civic scale

4: I am a nationalist, patriot, non-interventionist, and oppose interventionism and globalism

5: I support racial and gender equality

6: I support a market based economy but with regulations and programs to benefit the many and help the poor

7: I oppose both theocracy and state atheism

8: I am a communitarian and oppose individualism, seeing it as degenerate

9: I endorse technological advancement

10: I take a neutral stance foreign policy wise

Scores
- 10/10

- 10/10

Nekoqing- 9/10

- 7/10

- 9/10

- 5/10

7.5/10

6.5/10

- 5.5/10

- 5.5/10

Yugo - 4/10

Ideologies of People I Know IRL
Father -

He tends to be moderate on social views, supporting LGBT rights (but opposing LGBT ideology and thinks that the community should’ve stopped after same sex marriage was legally recognized) and thinking that abortion should be legal, although only for the first three months, however he has rather anti-Islamic views (though ironically enough also opposes Israel) and thinks that culture can be a good thing. Foreign policy wise he is patriotic and non-interventionist. Economically speaking he thinks that the government should merely be a watchman state and opposes universal healthcare and most social programs

Friends
- very similar ideology and my best friend on this site

ComradeRabbit95 - great person and very based ideology, glad I inspired you :)

Nekoqing - I knew him for a long time, another great friend and kinda based ideology

- meh ideology, based person

- same as above

- another based ideology and person

PaleoFabius - tbh I don’t like how you became more of a racial nationalist, but still has some based aspects and is a based person

- nice person, ok ideology

- cringish ideology but nice person

Opinions on Alliances
NATO - bombs the third world and uses countries for their own interest in the name of “freedom and democracy”.

European Union - yes I think that the EU is the second coming of Nazi Germany, cope harder. In all seriousness though, cringe. Forcing progressivism onto other countries, backing color revolutions, free trade, anti-nationalist, and anti-populist, cringe.

Ideological Critiques
Wip

Comments

 * Add me?

Sure -
 * [[File:EpicConIcon.png]] NazBolGANG12 - If I don't care about something do put half a point or zero point?


 * half a point -

- add me Bman - Add me
 * done -

-Add me?

Add me?

SuddenWriter - add?

UserWiki:SamKibGuy : Add me, comrade.