UserWiki:DarknightYuusha-11

Hello there, I'm the most schizo motherfucker in this entire wiki DarknightYuusha(formerly SussyNuoh/ComradeLelouch), but if you know me from the Polcompball Fandom wiki(which is basically dead), I'm Quagsus btw

if you want to be friend with me, you can, just don't be personally cringe.

A liker of edgy and fedtastic shit, so expect me to same some pretty dumb stuff

I'm also the guy that created the Parties and Movements of Code Geass Page

And yes, I am a schizophrenic, and a proud one too, problem? = Political Journey = Undergoing Maintenance Phase 1 = Apolitical childhood

Phase 2 = Apolitical childhood but with a liking towards Duterte and Trump ///

Phase 3 = Baizuo Neo-Marxist-Leninist Redditor days /////

Phase 4 = Post-Baizuo Trauma Progressive Authoritarian Communist ///

Phase 5 = Anti-Idpol Marxian Left-Patriot ////

Phase 6 = Admiralism (///////)

Phase 7 = Admiralism Stage 2 (///////)

Phase 8 = Philippine Social Populism (///////)

Phase 9 = Evoluder Lelouchism (///////)

Phase 10 = Darknight Yuusha Model (///////)

Phase 11 = Darknight Yuusha Model Stage 2 (///////)

=Beliefs(See also, )= I am rewriting this part

Mode of production
My type would be that of socialism, market socialism in particular, combined with elements of social corporatism and social distributism, where within the workplaces of cooperatives and enterprises, there will be a partnership in which the workers will have primary control over in the means of production, being given the ability to hold democratic decisions within the workplace, to have their rights enforced, and to reduce power of owners that dare harm them out of genuine exploitation, with that said, the owners will still have a small, yet crucial niche, within the workplace, and that they will serve as watchmen within the democratic workplace to help in negotiations as to ensure satisfaction between the workers and owners and to prevent corruption that can seriously disorganized the workplace if left unchecked, in addition to prevent shady dealings and abuse, thus, they will be at least be given a rather small, yet notable level of control, as for the state's role, in smaller and medium enterprises, the state would only serve a rather minimal role akin to a watchman, doing some small scale supervision to ensure minimalization of exploitation, but on large enterprises, the state will play a more significant role and will play a part in the publicization of said large enterprises as large enterprises in general aren't trustworthy when privatized due to the tendency of significant presence of monopolization and exploitation done by large private businesses

As for class issues, whilst such a mode of production does indeed show that I am an advocate for class collaboration, as of the current situation, it's nearly impossible to be useful as a means considering how many elites have a grip of power in this world, and that the current status quo is geared towards their greed, thus, for the current moment, I support class struggle so that once the exploitative elites have been purged and only the fair, contributive, and legitimate within the upper classes remain, class collaboration can truly be in it's ideal state.

An economy under the common good
My economic system has pro-market stances, being against the idea of a primarily centrally planned economy where sluggishness and stagnation is present due to the over-reliability towards the government in dealing with goods, but is also against the idea of a neoliberal/laissez-faire capitalist system, and because the systems of neoliberalism and laissez-faire capitalism are festered with inhumane, exploitative, and elitist practices within their systems, there should be a market system under regulations and a strong safety net so that not only shall they ensure minimalization exploitation, protecting workers and consumers alike, but also the vitality of the competitive spirit(although cooperation should also be encouraged instead of the Darwinian methodology of survival of the fittest or similar principles) as the market is a vital factor in driving innovation.

For the prices of products, there will be several diverse factors that shall prove detrimental to acceptable pricing, such as quality and category, but generally, products may be sold within the acceptable price range, but local planning will still be done to a degree, even if the local governments have a low degree of control(particularly on small enterprises), they remain crucial in managing regional economic affairs, helping regions make economic decisions of their own, nonetheless, nationwide laws and regulations should still be followed to ensure crackdown and prevention of economic exploitation and injustice within regions.

To answer why decentralized planning is preferred over centralized planning, as some might define planning's role as done under the whole of society, as centralized planning puts the basis of planning under bureaucrats, the problem is revealed as the nature of central planning would be similar to that of the frequently oligarchical tendencies of capitalism but instead of plutocrats, it would be bureaucrats having the control, furthermore, decentral planning has superior damage control compared to central planning, as under a central command economy, should one region suffer economic deficiency, then a catastrophic domino effect would occur and the entire economy would fall into chaos, decentral planning however doesn't suffer this domino effect.

Anti-trust laws shall be also put into effect in order to crack down on monopolies in order to ensure fairness within the market and prevent lesser enterprises from being trampled, the same notion shall be implemented into guilds, as one guild should not become too powerful and that greater guilds shan't trample over lesser ones.

Property matters
A mix of private and public property shall be within an economic system like this, acknowledging the benefits and the necessities of both playing a role in society, some things like small and medium enterprises shall be private, others like large enterprises, energy, and essential services shall be public, and to things like housing, education, and healthcare, there would be a mix between both although with the latter two leaning more towards publicization.

as much as the existence of private property is acknowledged, it must be widespread in order to prevent it from falling into the hands of the greedy and powerful elites, a similar reason can be said for the aforementioned examples on why those are collective property, and that is to prevent the elites from having a grip in the economy and direct it to serve their never-ending greed in which that shall hinder society, the people's livelihood, and development for the common good of the nation and community as a whole.

Enterprises, Guilds, and Unions
As mentioned before, there shall be a mix of a private sector comprised of small and medium enterprises, and a collective sector of large enterprises and essential services, and with these organizations, there shall be a democratic guild system, jointly owned by the workers and owners, each formed and organized to their own category of Profession, Industry, and position in which they are most fit, harkening back to the medieval guild system

As for Unions themselves, they will be promoted alongside cooperatives due to the genuinely glamorous benefits they can bring on the table, as for one, they are useful to help workers fight for their rights, especially considering the current economic situation as in many parts of the world, workers suffer exploitation day in and day out, two, the general emphasis of their role as blood cells of the nation, further emphasized and encouraged through hard work strengthened through organized labor, which can be helpful in potentially increasing production, as workers will be incentivized to work with their needs satisfied, although even with the generally glamorous benefits, there are still some drawbacks, mainly that a union can potentially fall under corruption, and that there might be a bit of potential unemployment increased, however, those drawbacks can be mitigated through the owner's role as a watchman for the former and the addition of labor market policies (eg: vocational training, job search assistance, public works programs) for the latter

And to answer the question of union busting, it shall be recognized as unconstitutional and even illegal under most cases, especially when workers strike out of genuine oppression committed against them, as well as striking out of dissatisfaction, speaking of such cases, the state will openly support the strike for the former case, and for the latter case, there shall be negotiations held instead to ensure a compromise, the only time it would be ever legal is when an individual union is committing acts done out of greed, corruption, or exploitation, but even then, only the individuals responsible for such would be punished, whilst the other workers innocent within said union would remain unharmed.

Cooperative Endorsement
Cooperatives are to be endorsed and promoted greatly as their use to increase the presence of workplace democracy, strengthen the rights of workers, and bring in a basis of promoting an economy under the common good, and because of the aforementioned value cooperatives bring, in a similar fashion seen in Vietnam, Cooperatives will be brought in many benefits traditional businesses do not, and such benefits will be given so long as anything exploitative/shady isn't done.

Healthcare and education
As for healthcare, as mentioned before, there shall be a mix of private and public healthcare, covered by the state they shall be, nevertheless, private healthcare facilities shall be subject to regulation(eg: following anti-abortion laws, medicines shall be sold at a set price), and those shall be part of guilds, organized at the local level

The same case can be said for education, there shall be a mix of private and public schools, and that private schools shall be subject to set regulations and rules for the education system, those private schools shall be integrated into guilds as well

Welfare and social programs
There shall be a wide variety of social programs such as infrastructure and rural development, scientific advancement, housing, education, environmental protection, those shall be supported for the sake of improving the socioeconomic conditions and livelihood of the people, especially towards those struggling in an economic fashion, taxpayer money would also be directed towards such all, with the same reason on why they are directed towards those programs.

as for the welfare state, there shall be a strong welfare state alongside a social safety net to provide for the people, however, one must put effort and labor in order to receive and retain welfare benefits, as Lenin once said, he who does not work shall not eat, as laziness is undesirable in a society and so is one leeching of those very benefits whilst not contributing to the nation, additionally, as it's purpose is to help those struggling, welfare shall be mainly directed towards the lower classes and the disabled, with welfare directed to corporations and upper class citizens being discouraged significantly or abolished entirely.

even with the significant presence of a strong welfare state, private charities won't be discouraged as a method for helping the poor, they would be encouraged instead but they must follow regulations in order to ensure their legitimacy, and if such charities turn out to be scams, they will be dismantled

Banks and credit unions
I advocate the need of a central bank, on the regional level however, banks are to become democratically-held mutual savings banks/credit unions as to prevent monopolization of credit and further reduce economic exploitation, said democratic mutual savings banks and credit unions also turn out to outperform capitalist banks, as they are safer during recessions and that consumers have greater confidence in democratic banks than in capitalist ones

Fiscal policy
Whilst reckless spending may be a bad thing for the economy, what's also bad is having the economy being prioritized over the people, as such, I would support government spending, and on crises, deficit spending will be made, as for taxation, I would generally have a progressive tax system, with the rich having to pay greater taxes than the poor, as so the money gained from such taxation will increase and will be directed to social programs, which in turn would benefit society.

The minimum wage
A baseline 15$ minimum wage shall be implemented in economic law as so that workers can cover the costs they will have to pay, although there shall be adjustments due to differing sectors, situations, or inflation.

Trade and tariffs
I consider calling myself as a mutual protectionist, usually leaning towards protectionism for my economic nationalism and believing the use of trade to help nations gain resources they're unable to produce by themselves and not much beyond that, wanting a fair trade policy where I wish to strike a balance between free trade and protectionism, as I not only understand how cross-national trade can benefit the nation and help the economy flourish if dealt with correctly, but also acknowledge the importance of economic sovereignty and self-reliance and that foreign economic dominance is an act of subjugation and therefore sinful, I also acknowledge how both free trade and autarky are flawed to their cores, as the respective problems I just mentioned are prevalent in such trading systems, the former lacking the necessary protection against economic imperialism done by major powers which allows exploitative practices to happen and forcefully indebt the nation, and the latter for it's fanatical isolation and economic stagnation due to the lack of cross-national economic dialogue, both of these problems mentioned would serve to harm and degrade the socioeconomic conditions and livelihood of the people.

Foreign investors, whilst sometimes beneficial, can also be a major hindrance due to the threat of monopolization that can very much leave very few jobs left to the citizens of the nations faltering economic independence and causing massive potential economic injustice, so when dealing with them, there shall be a policy of skepticism where should there be any usefulness for some foreign investors, they will be allowed to come, but should also follow relatively strict laws to prevent the effects of monopolization and job displacement, otherwise any deals made by them are passed over if there isn't anything significantly useful found.

The Energy Question
As the economy shall be based on the common good, and shall provide for the common good, so too shall energy, in which it shall be publicized and distributed in a more widespread manner to ease the accessibility, in addition to that, the resulting non-green economic energy sectors shall begin a transition to adopt environment-friendly policies and measures, such as the implementation of a carbon tax, the incentivization of worker-cooperatives within workplaces in economic energy sectors, and more especially the general transformation of fossil-fuel factories into more environmental-friendly industries and workplaces, mainly under nuclear

Economic Regionalism
As each region has differing situations and differing material conditions, there shall be slight adjustments(leftward or rightward depending on the situation) to the economic system so that it shall achieve the goals of economic justice, prosperity, equity, and fairness in said country, rightward examples of such are Poland and Singapore, where the former had disdain towards it's communist past and the latter being an island country lacking the resources in it's home to produce for itself, leftward examples of such are most of the third world, where such is to a home of great economic prosperity and equity only stopped in it's tracks by the economic injustice committed by the ruling elites of the third world and the imperialist elites of major powers.

Dynamics of The state and the people
There should be a delicate balance of power between the people and the state as to ensure that the people have the power to retain their liberties when society is under peacetime, and that the state is able to safeguard the people and fight against criminals and/or terrorists that dare threaten society in addition to protecting the nation from imperialists and foreign invaders in addition to that, exposing and fighting corruption(eg: whistleblowing) will be a necessity in order to keep the delicate balance in check, such delicate balance of power will also be a key in playing a part in a concept of a dual-failsafe between both the state and the people, in which should either of the two entities fail(the state/people) suffer inefficiency within a situation, the other will be given the ability to deal with the problem the struggling entity is dealing with, for example, if the police force is unable to protect the citizens from criminals, then the citizens themselves will be able to protect themselves thanks to gun rights, another example will be if the people are struggling to fight off terrorists, then the state in addition to the military's strength will counter them, to answer where I am in the civic spectrum, I'm civically moderate, particularly statist in summary.

The question of Vanguardism
Vanguardism, to my eyes, is high-risk and high-reward, as a strong guiding hand, if utilized correctly, can bring the nation to prosperity and quell threats that dare slow or even halt the progress of development entirely, however, the guiding vanguard can also become a threat in of itself if it ever falls into corruption and ends up being a self-serving elite class, and because of that, it's only usable in a niche under situations where a country is faced with threats such as instability, division, terrorism, imperialism, and etc, and due to how I wish for a government under the rule of the common good, the vanguard party will ultimately step down from power once the country has reached significant development and is on a good enough shape that a democracy can thrive.

Democratic Function
As the government's very duty is to serve the people it governs, then the best way to fulfill this role is through a democratic republic, under which the people are given the rights to choose their leaders, enact their policies, and decide laws, however, such things can only be true when the democratic republic is primarily oriented towards popular sovereignty of the people, as the ideals of representative/liberal democracy are nothing but decadent elitist mockery of true democratic mandate, as true democracy is achieved through sovereignty of citizens, there shall be direct rule through democratically elected councils, in which those democratic councils will have participation by citizens around 16/18 and above, functioning similarly to the popular congresses and people's committees proposed by Gaddafi and the popular assemblies by the EZLN, said councils will range from levels as small as a district, to the highest possible level, the national level, although on the national level, there will be at least some degree of partisanship alongside a president as a head of state, so such a democracy would resemble that of a semi-direct consensus democracy leaning towards direct rule, on every other level however, partisanship will cease.

Ranked voting would be the systematic method of processing votes, since unlike first past the post, which is a failed system that greatly limits the freedom of decision to a situation akin to where there is no other choices between yes and no, ranked voting allows the voter to make decisions under much greater freedom, virtually eliminating the dictatorial and oligarchical political polarization apparent under FTPF, and during decision making, those councils will strive to achieve a consensus where laws shall be passed, although the option of a 2/3 majoritarian vote will also be available.

Federalization
Federalism would be considered as the ideal system in the central-decentral government spectrum as it allows regions to represent their people and culture better within the nation, in addition to leaving some issues that may be too complicated for the national government left to the states through stronger separate regional laws within each regional government, however, despite the call for federalization, the need of social cohesion is a must in society as to prevent chaos and disunity amongst the country, thus it is a necessity for regional governments to be subject to follow national laws and the constitution.

on the occasions where a country is small and homogenous however, a unitarian government is more effective, as it doesn't really make sense to decentralize a country that is rather uncertain to suffer the potential hindrances of a unitarian governmental system due to it's small area and homogenic composition.

Law and the police force
As the very threat of crime can result in criminals causing havoc within society, in which the lives of people can be ruined as a result of this, the police force is a necessity to ensure the protection of lives and the enforcement of law, to ensure this, there shall a competent and potent police force in addition to funding said police force as to ensure that the cops are to be as efficient in dealing with crimes

despite such support, I am also opposed to police brutality and corruption, and because of this, there shall be regulations to ensure that the police won't be corrupted by an overflow of power and that they will not commit acts of abuse against the people they serve to protect, in addition, whilst I support funding for the police, I don't want said spending to go overboard, and that such spending is not meant to transform the police into a tyrannical and corrupt bureaucratic organization, but rather to ensure that the police are to fulfill the role of serving and protecting the people through efficient and benevolent methodological management of power

Penalties for crimes
Generally, I would use a mix of rehabilitative and punitive justice when punishing criminals, as there would be at least some form of rehabilitation when punishing crimes whether minor or major, and it's generally more prevalent on minor crimes, though as crimes get more severe, punitive means would be more often used, and as for the death penalty, it will be instated, but this will only be reserved under the condition of the criminal being guilty of a heinous crime beyond any shadow of doubt

as for fining, whilst I do understand that punishments shouldn't be too harsh, fining is also prone to corruption as it could result in the criminal refusing to stop committing crimes and buying one's way out of justice, because of this, fining will only be used once on the very first time a crime is committed, after this, if repeated for a 2nd time and onwards, community service would be used instead as punishment

News and Media
With the ever growing dangers of polarized media, regardless if private or under the state, resulting in bias, slander, and misinformation, further bolstered by manufactured consent, bringing in a harmful generation of conformist illiteracy, it is a must that the fairness doctrine should be implemented in order to prevent this, as under the power of the fairness doctrine, opposing viewpoints will be represented equally and fairly when serious/controversial matters are discussed in media, which will serve to curb the performative activism omnipresent in the current times.

Freedom of speech
Very much a Staunch supporter of freedom of speech and the free marketplace of ideals, in addition to acknowledging that humans indeed have free will, I am opposed to censorship against ideals most of the time even rather vile ones, not only is it rather immoral to strip the rights to freedom of speech of a person just for views, but also when it comes to countering the aforementioned vile ideologies like wokeness and alt-right, it's very much ineffective due to the risk of legitimizing said movement, all of this is also a major factor in playing a role within the dual-failsafe of the state and the people.

The Paradox of tolerance, whilst decent theoretically as a measure to protect the free marketplace of ideals, has become awful in practice most of the time ever since it has been effectively ruined by several people who use it as a justification to silence all other opinions they oppose, speaking of censorship and protection of the free marketplace of ideals, while I genuinely oppose the former for the most part, it may still be utilized under the following conditions as to fulfill the importance of the latter. if only one of those conditions are met, then social ostracization through popular support against such threats would be ideally better as to reduce their power and foothold whilst not running the risk of legitimizing those threats through censorship
 * Condition 1:The threat and it's proponents has gained a significant foothold in the political realm
 * Condition 2:Said proponents are going to dismantle the free marketplace of ideals and silence anyone who dares disagree with them.

As I also oppose censorship, I'm also a strong opponent of hate speech laws, alongside the aforementioned reasons why I'm generally opposed to censorship usually, hate speech laws can also have a very discriminatory nature, as very often said laws are meant to protect certain people of certain groups from harm, certain individuals that are willing to harm others and get off unpunished for their crimes will abuse those laws to achieve that, while the advocates of those laws argue that it's a good measure to prevent toxicity, those laws only serve the contrary as they outright deny the free will humans have by forcing a conformist aura to the people to nullify any differing opinions of significance, and such is only proven further through supplementation by all of the aforementioned reasons.

To reform or to revolt
Whether to reform or to revolt is chosen depending on which of those means is most efficient in attaining ideological goals, generally, in more peaceful times, where society hasn't reached a point of extreme decay, where meaningful change can still be attained peacefully, reform is usually better, on the conditions where a country is unstable, under dictatorial rule, or whether meaningful change is just too slow or nigh impossible through reform, then the option to revolt is a more preferable choice, however, as with both, I would rather avoid bloodshed as much as possible towards innocent civilians, and would only do so if there isn't any other choice

with the ever strengthening grip of elite classes however, which have allowed them to divide the people through slander and lies, and that they turn reforms meant to change for the better, become mere concessions and meaningless victories that keep or even strengthen the elites' position, it's clear that I've been slowly losing my faith on reform, and that bloodless revolution has started becoming a seemingly more viable option over reform

[[File:Progconf.png]] Culturally/Socially
Undergoing improvement

Progressivism or Conservatism
I consider myself as a progressive-conservative in a way, infusing both progressive and conservative elements to my societal ideals, another thing to take account is that the terms "progressive" and "conservative" are broad and ultimately arbitrary in meaning and context within my eyes in addition to acknowledging that the politics regarding culture/society aren't one dimensional, and that the situations and material conditions of each separate country should be also taken to account for such, and because of such reasons, I have leanings depending on how developed an area is, being more conservative on very developed areas and more progressive on underdeveloped ones, for example, in the case of the west, a highly developed region, I am culturally right, as the west has progressed enough in culture to potentially achieve a prosperous state of being, but many progressives in the west want to rid such potential by ridding the beneficial traditions kept and replacing them with inclusive idpol and decadent cultural liberalism, so it's a necessity to conserve the beneficial traditions and cultural values that help western society flourish, on the flip side, in the case of many third world countries, several of which are underdeveloped, I'm culturally left, seeing how many backward customs such as gender inequality, racial divide, caste systems, rule of the clergy, and literal slavery still exist within them, it doesn't make sense to be a conservative in that issue as third world societies currently are infested with such detrimental customs that it's a necessity that those societies must significantly progress to a point where only the beneficial traditions remain and the detrimental customs phased out and abolished(ofc without the inclusive idpol and cultural liberal materialism bullshit)

Gender Fairness
Men and women in the end are fundamentally equal to each other, and thus, there must be equal treatment under the law, equal benefits, equal punishments, equal pay, and equal rights, with that in mind, I support the first wave of feminism completely as well as the second wave for the most part(excluding the pro-abortion), however, from the third wave and onwards, will be opposed due to the heavy amount of infectious idpol and how those waves promote individualistic degeneracy that can serve to break the balance of men and women in addition to inflicting harm to women as well, one particular example is their promotion of sex work in general, in which it has a history of harmful exploitation against women.

Gender roles, whilst they shouldn't be abolished with the presence of people willing to fulfill those roles under their consent, shouldn't be strict either, in a sense, I utterly oppose the amount of modern feminists and "red-pilled" masculists whining about the patriarchy/matriarchy in the areas it ceased to exist, but at the same time, oppose the notion of the patriarchy/matriarchy as those concepts serve to prevent gender egalitarianism and create a realm where one gender oppresses the other through a Darwinian hedonist fashion, and in areas that such things exist, there will be a fight to abolish those concepts.

Racial egalitarianism
All men, regardless of race, are fundamentally human, and thus must be treated equally in rights, punishments, and benefits, alongside being given the ability to participate within democratic decision making, whilst a significant portion of the world has progressed on the issue of race, the problem of a significant portion of races having poor living standards still remains, in which it is still a certain issue, however, those issues can't be solved through identitarianism and racial guilt, as these solutions only serve to further racial tensions, but rather through solidarity, as the greatest cause of these problems is socioeconomic injustice, and to defeat the root cause is to unite the masses to defeat it, as lower class people even coming from different races that are struggling socioeconomically are still fundamentally the same people who suffer economic injustice, to quote Fred Hampton, "We say you don't fight racism with racism. We're gonna fight racism with solidarity. We say you don't fight capitalism with no black capitalism; you fight capitalism with socialism.".

Religious matters
A generally secular law in regards to religion is preferred, as religion, whilst being good to provide for the first footsteps and frameworks of several laws and morals, should generally stay out of the government for the most part, tolerating Christian/Islamic/Insert Religion here Democracy at most, as it has been constantly used as a tool by theocratic clergymen to alienate and manipulate people into doing things out of their own self-interest, in addition to those very clergymen using religion as a justification to commit their own atrocities and suppress the power of the people, in spite of this, there should also be freedom of religion as one still has the right to believe or not to believe in a religion so long as one respects others, as state atheism is merely an irreligious theocracy in function, as anti-theistic bureaucrats do the same thing clergymen do, and that they use atheism as a tool to fulfill their own greedy ends.

Right to firearms
The right to bear firearms can prove to be a strong benefit, with an armed people readily defensive and worthily responsible, firearms prove to be useful in playing a part in the dual failsafe of the state and the people, further benefits include significantly greater resistance against imperialists that dare ever threaten to subjugate or conquer the nation, although guns rights can prove to bring great benefits, there comes it's problems of unnecessary violence at the wrong hands, even so, this still doesn't justify a strong gun ban, as the reasons why such unnecessary violence happens has more to do with the mentality of the shooters and not the guns themselves, as guns are inanimate and thus cannot have the sentience to shoot by their own.

With that being said to prevent such violence from happening, there will be background and health checks every year to find out if a firearm wielder is eligible to retain the rights to bear those firearms or not, having a one/two strike policy as punishment should there be failure, furthermore, one must gain a license through a test to prove one's worthiness in addition to those with firearms being recommended to ensure that their guns wouldn't be robbed by irresponsible criminals, to top it all off, certain firearms far too dangerous for one to wield like flamethrowers will be banned.

[[File:Nation.png]] Diplomatically
I oppose interventionism in almost all cases, for what happens elsewhere outside the nation is none of our business unless they're the first ones to cause provocation, not only that, it has mostly resulted in a negative end, and I refuse to add insult to injury.

Geopolitical views
Under a rework

China and Taiwan
When people say the phrase "Taiwan is China", such a statement is very much false in both ways, as neither China or Taiwan have effective legitimate control over the other, thus, Taiwan is independent, but the PRC will remain as the true China, and thus, Taiwan should forge it's own independent path, on the matter of Xinjiang, Tibet, and Hong Kong, they will remain under Chinese rule as unlike Taiwan, they're all under legitimate control, although for the former two's unique cultural identities, I support federalization and cultural autonomy for them.

But for Hong Kong, I am opposed to the protests as the city itself has been stolen by the British imperialists and suffered under their rule, thus I oppose any notion that British rule of Hong Kong is better than China and thus support the PRC's, in addition to the protestors doing unnecessary violence against innocent civilians such as looting, furthermore, whilst their rights to freedom may be understandable, as it was mentioned that Hong Kong was stolen by the British and that unlike Xinjiang and Tibet, Hong Kong's cultural background is rather similar to the mainland's, it makes no sense for separation, if the protestors' cries to rights were actually reasonable, then federalization would be the better choice as well as rejecting unnecessary violence against innocents.

Cyprus
The TRNC is merely a failed imperialist puppet state of Turkey, thus, I support Cyprus as the legitimate belligerent of this situation, however, both the Turkish and Cypriot ethnicities should unite through peaceful negotiations

Israel and Palestine
Israel is nothing but an imperialist, Atlanticist, elitist, and ethnocratic Zionist state that constantly suppresses the will of Palestinians, so thus, I support Palestine in this conflict, but I am opposed to Hamas due to their crimes and antisemitism, so for me, I prefer a one state solution under a secular, civic nationalist, and anti-imperialist Palestine, although a two state solution is also feasible provided Israel finally gains true legitimacy by dropping Zionism altogether in favor of a more civic nationalist and anti-imperialist ideology.

Korea
The only true Korea is a united, neutral, anti-imperialist, nationalist, and democratic Korea free from the grip of major powers, both North and South Korea are but puppet states that refuse to unlock Korea's true potential as a united nation, as North Korea is just a stagnant and personal dictatorship, and that South Korea, despite looking seemingly better than the "Communist" North, is ripe with major problems such as high union busting activity, overworking, significant unemployment(particularly on the youth), oligarchical presence of Chaebols, and low fertility rates thanks to the neoliberal tenants embedded within the country, and I say this as one who is actually Korean

NATO
NATO is an neo-colonial imperialist warmongering organization that serves the never-ending greed of the ultra-wealthy, constantly doing unnecessary interventions under the facade of "spreading liberty and democracy throughout the world", bringing ruin against the nations(especially third world countries) it has sinned against in it's wake to spread the global capitalist order, regardless if Neocons truly believe in spreading liberty and democracy, the organization and neocons themselves only serve to worsen conflicts and disputes, Afghanistan? a fucking military-industrial complex circus, Ukraine-Russia? even more of a shitshow than ever, the Spratlys? tensions are scorched to the near ground, Syria, Libya, and Yemen? utterly ravaged, not to mention the atrocities and imperialist deeds they have committed in Latin America, Africa, and Asia, in which both of my homelands are amongst the countries subject to the horrors of those neo-colonial imperialists.

"BUT MUH SCO RUSSIA CHINA THREAT, NATO IS GUD", NATO only serves to worsen the tensions between the east and the west as well as serving to legitimize 2nd world imperialism, ideally, both organizations should dissolve and the hegemony of major powers between both worlds should be curbed.

all in all, fuck NATO, and fuck neo"conservatives", as well as the awful acts they have aggressed against the nations they have aggressed.

Russia-Ukraine
As both the Russian and Ukrainian governments are ripe with corruption, with Putin being a damn oligarch that only serves to himself and pushes Russia to shit even further through his shit methodology, and that NATO and the EU are imperialist neoliberal organizations only serve to worsen the conflict regardless if they intend to help Ukraine or only take advantage of the situation for their own greed, the only ones that are innocent in this conflict are the Ukrainian and Russian people who protest against such a brother war, as well as to an extent, the Russians in Donetsk and Luhansk who wish for more autonomy

as for territorial disputes, since the Crimean people have chosen to be part of Russia, they will remain Russian so long as they choose to, as for Donetsk and Luhansk, a popular democratic vote by their people and only their people shall be the deciding factor

[[File:Corp.png]] The elite capitalist class [[File:Plutocrat.png]]
=Ideology Ranking=

Positive

 * [[File:Marketsoc.png]] Market Socialism - The right and most proficient way to do markets and socialism, and economic democracy is a necessity for society to progress towards a future of true socioeconomic prosperity
 * [[File:Social corpratism.png]] Social Corporatism - quite a great system, albeit rather moderate, but your ideas still remain efficient as ever to provide for the people
 * [[File:Socgeo.png]] Social Georgism - Amongst the best of systems to scare greedy capitalist landlords
 * [[File:Distributist.png]] Distributism - Basically a superior alternative to capitalism in virtually every way, I dislike your theocratic tendencies though.
 * [[File:Consocf.png]] Conservative Socialism - Patcon but better, the workers must fight for their morals.
 * [[File:Nation.png]] Nationalism - it is a duty that one must love the homeland and his fellow countrymen
 * [[File:Leftnat.png]] Left-Wing Nationalism - For the nation, for the workers, for the people, and for self-determination, you've always been based and you will remain this way for the longest time
 * [[File:Civnat.png]] Civic Nationalism - The basis of a patriot is not by one's identity, but by one's love and respect to not only the nation one serves, but also to other patriots as well.
 * [[File:Cultural Nationalism.png]] Cultural Nationalism - Whilst it isn't bad for foreign cultures to be introduced to the homeland, the necessity of preserving the national culture still remains integral to the nation itself.
 * [[File:Envi.png]] Environmentalism - What even is the Earth when we forsake it of the natural habits, landmarks, and ecosystems that has allowed it to stay prosperous and healthy, the environment must be preserved for generations to come so the conditions of a future can be possible.
 * [[File:Progconf.png]] Progressive Conservatism - My exact social policies, I do however have a leaning towards either side depending on the region, but it's a surefired must that there must be both conservative and progressive elements.
 * [[File:Intercult.png]] Interculturalism - Multiculturalism without the division and self-segregation, and Monoculturalism without the cultural imperialism and supremacism, which is virtually perfect
 * [[File:Fed.png]] Federalism - The need of social cohesion is one of great value, but so is the improving the lives, granting the self-determination, and representing better the local peoples within a country

Regional

 * [[File:3princ.png]] Tridemism - Sun Yat-sen was a heroic inspiration to us all with his anti-imperialist, nationalist, modern, democratic values that will bring a hopeful future to the people's livelihood, a shame that Yuan Shikai fucked up everything, what's worse is that Sun died too soon and Chiang had to taint your legacy.
 * [[File:Hochi.png]] Ho Chi Minh Thought - another anti-colonial hero in Asia that liberated his nation and his people from the shackles of imperialism, suppressing the Montagnard indigenous population was bad though, but I still highly respect you nonetheless, a shame that my homelands sided with N*TO and Fr*nce
 * [[File:Long.png]] Longism - You were the man America needed the most, I'm quite eerie with the corruption you do but even so, EVERY MAN A KING
 * [[File:Tito.png]] Titoism - A strongman leader that has defended Yugoslavia from the fascist bandits and held the brotherhood of the Yugoslav nation(although sadly, only for so long have you held it together), also a based market socialist, although IMF Loans and 30% unemployment were rather bad, as well as your brutality to an extent, still based nevertheless.

Leaning positive

 * [[File:Socauth.png]] Social Authoritarianism - Me in a pinch, although I much prefer a government based off the rule of the common good, you're still based especially in economics, and I do have some sort of liking towards several SocAuth figures.
 * [[File:Sorelia.png]] National Syndicalism - I consider myself a moderate version of you in at least some way, although I share rather similar economics, I lack some shared tenants culture wise, and I'm still pro-democracy(direct), I have to admit, the ideas of national myth and heroism do sound interesting though.
 * [[File:Mach.png]] Machiavellianism - In the end, as much as it's bad to excessively do bad stuff all to attain goals whenever moral means can be efficient at times, you can't achieve goals without efficient means, I would rather taint my hands with evil to destroy evil than to remain morally just even if it means succumbing to that evil when it's clear that justice is unable to attain the efficiency to defeat evil.
 * [[File:Soc.png]] Socialism - Among my ideal goals, and I respect the rhetoric you have which makes you superior to capitalism, centrally planned socialism is awful though, I prefer a form that utilizes markets + decentralized planning instead
 * [[File:Patcon.png]] Paternalistic Conservatism - Tbh, you're too soft nowadays, but you're otherwise still based with your economics and social stances

Regional

 * [[File:Zapa.png]] Neozapatismo - The best anarchist, fighting for indigenous rights is pretty based, not to mention that you also fight against imperialists and that your form of progressivism is surprisingly great in addition to your mode of democratic processing, although even still, because of your anarchism, there have been some issues related in the region you're in that have been left unnoticed/undealt due to that.
 * [[File:Gaddaficap.png]] Gaddafism - Despite your flaws, such as supporting some awful groups like the CPP-NPA and Hamas, you still remain a based anti-imperialist leader that help improved the material conditions of Libya, I've also gained interest in reading the Green Book, and I agree on your critiques on representative democracy.

Neutral

 * [[File:Mutalist.png]] Mutualism - Among the least bad of the anarchists, your economics are quite based, as with the ideals of democratic banking, still an anarchist though.
 * [[File:Aneco.png]] Eco-Anarchism - Another amongst the least bad anarchists, even if you're still a damned anarchist, at least you care about the enviroment, also, local communities protecting the environment are based
 * [[File:Hcon.png]] LGBT Conservatism - One of the very few pink ideologies that are remotely tolerable, and you would've been higher had it not been for the fact that MANY OF YOUR ADHERENTS ARE [[File:Neocuckservative.png]] FUCKING NEOCONS.
 * [[File:Councom.png]] Council Communism - The only Puritan Marxist that is remotely tolerable, I have a liking towards your decentralization, still a filthy ultroid though
 * [[File:Clib.png]] Classical Liberalism - You were pretty based for your time, and I consider you as one of the only remotely decent liberals, but as of now, you are meh, also, your economics are rather cringe.
 * [[File:Conservative.png]] Conservatism - A rather broad term, but anyways, you're great when society has reached a significant point of development, but when it comes to underdeveloped areas, I'd say otherwise
 * [[File:Progress.png]] Progressivism - like the above, but unlike conservatism, you're great for underdeveloped areas, very developed ones, not so much

Leaning negative

 * [[File:Statesoc.png]] State Socialism - Sloppy, senile, corrupt, these words perfectly describes your non-evolutionary and stagnant methodology of your over-reliability on the government in economics, only serving to harm the workers more that it helps them more often than not, still preferable to most forms of capitalism however.
 * [[File:ML.png]] Marxism-Leninism - like the above but Marxian, whilst Vanguardism isn't always a bad idea, I'd rather have the government founded on the basis of the common good, but several of you have at least fought against imperialists and right-wing dictators, as well as improving the rights of women and living standards of nations, which makes you easily more preferable to [[File:Ultroid.png]] Ultroids.
 * [[File:Fiscon.png]] Fiscal Conservatism - Whilst I understand that excessive spending is bad and that we must proficiently manage our budget during times of crisis, to prioritize the economy over the people is unacceptable, oh, and most of you aren't really conservative in any sense of the word other than conserving the riches of exploitative millionaires and billionaires.
 * [[File:Socdem.png]] Social Democracy - Initially, you were a noble movement, wanting to transform the economy gradually to suit the common good and their needs for the betterment of society, now, you're nothing but a fallen shadow, a movement based of meaningless victory and elitist concession, and whilst I still respect classical/third world socdems, the problem of being far too soft to hit the elites hard still remains, hence why I abandoned you
 * [[File:Antifa.png]] Anti-Fascism - If only classical Anti-Fascists like Thalmann were still there, you would've not gone to shit thanks to those free-speech hating woke radlibs.

Negative

 * [[File:Cap.png]] Capitalism - Too Decadent of a system due to your tendency to be utterly infested with exploitation and unfairness with your corruption of the market, prioritization of profits above all, and centralization of control towards owners, not to mention how you and almost all of your forms are completely powercrept and outclassed(no pun intended) by distributism in virtually every way
 * [[File:Feud.png]] Feudalism - Exploitative, backwards, and inefficient, you're just plain awful, end of story
 * [[File:Corpcuck.png]] Corporatocracy and [[File:Plutocrat.png]] Plutocracy - *SHARPENS GUILLOTINE WITH REVOLUTIONARY INTENT*
 * [[File:Imp.png]] Imperialism - Constantly fuels the endless greed of the elites that look down upon those below, destroys the self-determination, families, and valuable traditions of nations, strips away the freedom and liberty other peoples have gained, and upstart hellish times of social injustice, just pure evil, and the worst thing about it is that it still remains to this day at high spirits under differing forms, you must be destroyed.
 * [[File:Neoliberal-icon.png]] Neoliberalism - Utterly exploitative and degenerate ideology in more ways than one, it's a must that peoples from all around the world must defiantly fight against your neo-aristocratic order.
 * [[File:Necon.png]] Neoconservatism - You are not a conservative at all nor are you a patriot, but rather an global elitist and imperialist criminal who plunges the third world into hell through your perpetual state of warmongering all for the sake of "freedom and democracy"
 * [[File:Neobert.png]] Neo-Libertarianism - Libertarianism but even worse, I hope you succumb painfully like the above
 * [[File:3way.png]] Third Way - You're just a Neocon with Socdem-ish economics corrupted by neoliberal tenants, fuck you for corrupting several left-wing parties in the west.
 * [[File:Mediastocracy flair.png]] Mediacracy - the abolishment of the fairness doctrine, the rule of oligarchical media, manufactured consent, and their consequences have been a disaster for society.
 * [[File:Succdem.png]] Modern Social Democracy - I GENUINELY FUCKING HATE YOU DEEPLY FOR RUINING THE NAME OF SOCIAL DEMOCRACY WITH YOUR HEDONISTIC DEGENERACY AND ELITIST CUCKOLDRY, SEVERAL SOCIAL DEMOCRATIC MOVEMENTS ARE RUINED THANKS TO YOU
 * [[File:LeftCom.png]] Puritan [[File:MLM.png]] Marxists [[File:Trot.png]]
 * [[File:LeftCom.png]] Left Communism - I do agree that socialist movements(and leftist ones in general) must be proletarian in nature, but otherwise, You're no revolutionary, you're just some armchair fool that shits on other leftists that achieve notable results through real effort for being bourgeois just because they literally have at at least a single deviance towards Marx's work.
 * [[File:MLM.png]] Marxism-Leninism-Maoism - There is no people's war, and you aren't revolting, just rebelling like the fanatical Jihad Communists you are without the people's support, only serving to legitimize the imperial elites through your crimes committed against the masses you claim to support.
 * [[File:Trot.png]] Trotskyism - Literally red neoconservatism, the idea of permanent revolution is just imperialism soaked in red, Stalin may have been horrible, but if you were to take power, then you would've been far worse for the Soviet Union in the long run, oh, and Trotsky deserved the ice pick.
 * [[File:Altr.png]] Alt-Right - Claims to be a menace towards degenerates, and yet you only end up being one, by having a sense of obsession towards supremacist idpol and that you're willing to preserve the horrible and detrimental traditions that hinder society just proves that reactionaries are as degenerate as those hedonistic cultural liberals.
 * [[File:React.png]] Reactionarism - Cope harder, the enlightenment was based and you only hate it because you just want society to turn back to a time where tradition considered detrimental like feudal society, caste systems, and theocratic law are omnipresent and where the aristocratic noblemen and clergy trampled over the common good like arrogant beasts.
 * [[File:Ultraprogressivism.png]] Revolutionary Progressivism - Destruction of past glories and intersectional hedonistic Idpol are just two absolutely abhorrent things that I want to vomit on, thanks for ruining progressivism, and yes, I am more true to the word of progressivism than you, for I want to progress to an era where you are out of the picture and when your ideological pillars are demonized at a widespread manner
 * [[File:Civlibert.png]] Civil Libertarianism - the only good things about you are your endorsement of free speech, defense of whistleblowers, and gun rights, as everything else about you is just bad as your culturally liberal tenants are just cringe-worthy, not to mention that it's indeed a business to deal with if degeneracy is to infect society and take a foothold to degrade it.
 * [[File:Racenat.png]] Racial Nationalism and [[File:Ethnonat.png]] Ethnic Nationalism - Don't call yourself a patriot if you prioritize your race/ethnicity above the nation and disrespect other patriots just for their differing ethnic/racial background.

Regional

 * [[File:Showa.png]] Showa Statism - Utterly barbaric and demonic, never shall I forgive your crimes against the peoples you have conquered and slaughtered through your so-called "honorable" path of total imperialist domination of the East Asian sphere.
 * [[File:Stalin.png]] Stalinism - I will give you credit for industrializing the Soviet Union to an astounding level as well as your defiance against the black shadow of the fascist-imperialist bandits, but the crimes you have done through your implementation of a totalitarian super-bureaucratic nightmare state and those innocents who fell victim to such a system are not to be forgotten, although I must admit your cultural stances and views on nationalism were surprisingly based, and that you were still the better option for the USSR instead of Tr*tsky in the long run.

=User Relation Quiz= as you yourself are a user of this wiki, you have been given by my will to have the honor to take this test to see how much you agree with me, how does this test work you may ask? well, you are given ten statements and you start with 0 based points, and agreeing to one of them gives you one based point, somewhat agreeing/disagreeing will give you .5 based points, and disagreeing entirely will result in no based points given, and once you finish the test, see how much based points you have received, and you've gotten a (insert basedness score)/10. post in the comments section/message me on discord if you are to show your results.

1.I support Conservatism in the west, non-woke non-radical paleoprogressivism elsewhere, and oppose the modern western woke "progressive" ideology 2.I endorse technological advancment 3.I am a non-radical, non-xenophobic nationalist, and oppose all forms of globalism except alter-globalization, 4.I support the welfare state, guilds, and the market economy and it's benefits under regulations and measures that ensure it being humane. 5.I am against Cultural extremism of both sides of the cultural spectrum in general 6.I disavow extreme libertarianism/authoritarianism 7.I am in for cultural religion in society, but I also support secularism and oppose Theocracies/State Atheism, as well as tolerate Christian/Islamic/Insert Religion here Democracy 8.I want to protect the environment and support environmentalism 9.I disavow sexual "liberation", pornography, prostitution, and sex work in general and support a crackdown against those things 10.I am non-interventionist and I am against all forms of imperialism. 11.I love Shrek, Shrek is love and Shrek is life(if you agree with this fully, You get a perfect score)

User Results
RESET DUE TO IDEOLOGICAL SHIFT : 4.5 (Idk how because you're pretty based) - 2/10 - 7/10  - 8/10  - 4/10 User:Savvas1984 - 5.5/10 - 9/10
 * 2/10
 * 1.5/10
 * 5.5/10
 * 8/10
 * 7.5/10

Yelling Yowie - 4.5/10

Nekoqing: 9.5-10/10

=Relations= UNDER A REWORK

Best Friends

 * ([[File:Marketsoc.png]]/[[File:Leftnat.png]]/[[File:Distributist.png]]/[[File:PrgessTrad.png]])- My best friend in the site and welcome back, we're also identical in ideals
 * ([[File:Marketsoc.png]]/[[File:Socdem.png]]/[[File:Civnat.png]]/[[File:Prog.png]]) - The First person I've ever called a best friend, quite based even if we aren't as ideologically close as once before.
 * ([[File:Natcom.png]]/[[File:Stalin.png]]/[[File:Erga.png]]/[[File:Statesoc.png]])- Funny secks amogus kara boga trollsome, the SuStalinism is iffy though, but still pretty gamer
 * ([[File:Absoc.png]]/[[File:Natcom.png]]/[[File:Erga.png]]/[[File:Georgist.png]])- Algerian Cumraid Shrek, Based and Halalpilled
 * [[File:PATS.png]] Nekoqing ([[File:Dengf.png]]/[[File:Leftnat.png]]/[[File:Consocf.png]]/[[File:Orthlen.png]])- Another based person with similar ideals but more dirigisme and auth, Mongoloid brothers 💪
 * [[File:Balodismconsmall.png]] Stotyzela([[File:Guildsoc.png]]/[[File:Corptism.png]]/[[File:PrgessTrad.png]]/[[File:Leftnat.png]]) - Yet Another Based friend who is also based ideologically
 * ([[File:Marketsoc.png]]/[[File:Leftnat.png]]/[[File:Socgeo.png]]/[[File:Progconf.png]] - Me but from Indonesia, also based person
 * - Cringish ideals but based person, also funni Clash Royale player HEHEHEHAW

Friends

 * - Based mouse king man comrade, but why the reactionary irredentism, still gamer though
 * - Not so sure about the reactionarism, but alright ideology and a nice person, fellow Baizuo slayer
 * [[File:SamKibGuy_icon_.png]]SamKibGuy - Friendly comrade though cringish ideology
 * - Bringish ideology tbh, but you're actually decent on a personal level.
 * - Friendly tridemist like the above albeit more cringe ideologically.

Neutral

 * [[File:S1984.png]] Savvas([[File:Demsocstar.png]]/[[File:Nation.png]]/[[File:Statlib.png]]) - Seems alright but idk about you much, state liberalism though is just outright 💀
 * - With the massive conflict finally dying down, IDK what to think of you, but it's best that we'll have to commit to reconstruction if relations are to improve, as there was a lot of negative energy left behind

Hall of Retards
If a person is to be ever ranked in this section, then than means said person was ranked for being a massive piece of shit in character
 * [[File:FabiusNewicon.png]] Fagbius([[File:Nazi.png]]/[[File:Altr.png]]/[[File:Hfash.png]]/[[File:Darwinist.png]]) - Once before, you used to be an honorable fascist with surprisingly based beliefs and dignified character, and then, you became a fucking neo-nazi and became bereft of any sort of morals, being a piss-filled brat showing of the most deplorable of behaviors known to this community, goes to show that you're no different than the degenerates you claim to oppose.
 * [[File:IrishNeoMarxist(alt).png]] Yugopart([[File:Hfash.png]]/[[File:Ultraprogressivism.png]]/[[File:Statlib.png]]/[[File:Neomarx.png]]) - One of the first friends I met during the fall of PCB fandom, and you used to be a good friend, until you started acting extremely irritating just like the person above, hating people just for their ideals and seeing freedom of speech as a "worthless bourgeois concept" despite the ideas of freedom of speech granting yourself a presence in the internet, also makes stupid and dumb arguments that are countered and ultimately amount to nothing

=Movements and Parties I support= just because I support a movement/party doesn't mean I support everything they do

North America

 * American Solidarity Party
 * Bloc Quebecois
 * New Democratic Party

the Caribbean, Central and South America

 * Morena
 * Zapatista Army of National Liberation
 * Sandinista Renovation Movement
 * Movement for Socialism
 * Social Convergence
 * Free Peru

Europe

 * Labour (Corbynite and One-nation factions only)
 * Die Linke
 * Law and Justice
 * Belaya Rus (against the border war and weaponization of immigrants, reconsidering due to this but still better than anything the EU could pull off, if only there was a party similar to the Sandinista Renovation movement there)
 * Russian Party of Freedom and Justice (in theory)

Asia

 * PDP-Laban
 * Communist Party of Vietnam
 * People's Action Party
 * Japanese Communist Party

the Middle East

 * Republican people's Party
 * Democratic Union Party
 * Palestine Liberation Organization

Africa
=Quotes= “One unfortunate thing about [the slogan] Black Power is that it gives priority to race precisely at a time when the impact of automation and other forces have made the economic question fundamental for blacks and whites alike. In this context a slogan ‘Power for Poor People’ would be much more appropriate than the slogan ‘Black Power.”
 * Rwandan Patriotic Front
 * Botswana Democratic Party
 * SWAPO

-- MLK

“We have spilt an ocean of blood for the brotherhood and unity of our peoples and we shall not allow anyone to touch or destroy it from within.”

-- Josip Broz Tito

“A national spirit is necessary for national existence. A flag is a material aid to the development of such a spirit. ”

-- Mahatma Gandhi

“Our secret weapon is nationalism. To have a nationhood, which is a sign of maturity, is greater than any weapon in the world”

-- Ho Chi Minh

“We got to face some facts. That the masses are poor, that the masses belong to what you call the lower class, and when I talk about the masses, I'm talking about the white masses, I'm talking about the black masses, and the brown masses, and the yellow masses, too. We've got to face the fact that some people say you fight fire best with fire, but we say you put fire out best with water. We say you don't fight racism with racism. We're gonna fight racism with solidarity. We say you don't fight capitalism with no black capitalism; you fight capitalism with socialism.”

-- Fred Hampton

“You cannot enjoy the advantages of a free press without putting up it's inconveniences”

-- Karl Marx

“A nation is a historically constituted, stable community of people, formed on the basis of a common language, territory, economic life, and psychological make-up manifested in a common culture.”

-- Joseph Stalin

“We should use our old moral values and our love of peace as the foundation of national reconstruction and look forward to the day when we shall become leaders in world reconstruction upon lines of international justice and good will.”

-- Sun Yat-sen

=Copypastas I made= Feel free to use them

Biden is awake
''Joe Biden is awake He was not as senile as we have thought Under the cloak of a neoliberal democrat, was something far more horrifying, a maniac seeking to kill God and establish a new world order through his racial Darwinism and totalitarian notion, wanting to usher a new era for America, one that would go down the path of an imperium made out of an ocean of blood Thou art has seized absolute power and thus has completed his plans to gain a titanium grip over America through the newly born Cult of Biden And now, our worst nightmares have come to light, Biden forms the United States of Hyperborea, implementing identitarian policies so vile that the Nazis would be shocked to the core, killing people ranging from the thousands to the millions utilizing penal methods so cruel that Imperial Japan and Khmer Rouge would tear our their eyes, and to those that oppose his path of conquest, thou art has gone on an imperial rampage so spine-chilling, that the Ottomans, Mongols, and Romans would ultimately regret their existence  God save us all, for no one else can

Cultural Marxism's true meaning
As a Cultural Marxian myself, I have been disappointed that people give misinformation on what Cultural Marxism is, they keep saying that it is an intersectional farce, but in reality, it's something else.

Cultural Marxism is about fucking mothers and making them give birth to Marxist offspring, why was Lenin a Marxian you may ask? because his father was a Marxian and secksed his wife, and if you ask me, how did I became a cultural Marxist, the thing is, my father wasn't an ordinary citizen, it was Stalin, he fucked my mother one night, I was born after that, do you know the reason why several people here are Marxian, it's because I, a cultural Marxist, have fucked their mothers so hard that they were the resulting offspring, if you're a Marxist yourself, then that means the father figure you thought you had was a lie, I am your father all along. =Icons I made= ,, , , , , , , , , , , =Gallery=

=Comments=

Comment section has been cleared of the old, feel free to make new comments


 * Add me? Also why do you keep changing names?

Me add :(


 * Matteel got permabanned.
 * replying to : Nah, he got temporary banned for one month

Yugo - literal fucking "socialism iphone" level argument lol
 * - mfw you call yourself a Marxist yet you hate freedom of speech despite Marx been an advocate of one himself "You cannot enjoy the advantages of a free press without putting up it's inconveniences" - Karl Marx  proves that your argument is retarded once again
 * Re-add me?

- Re-add me plz?

- re add plz

- I agree I would like to apologize I had a few shit days and nowhere for my anger to go and I took out on you guys sorry.

SamKibGuy: Re-add me, comrade.

User:Savvas1984- Re Add me Please?
 * - Re-add me.
 * - Ideoloigcally bringish? Can you elaborate?
 * - TBH, I really need a bit more in depth analysis of your ideas, and I might do a revise of that review
 * Add me?