UserWiki:Matteel/Sandbox

This is the place were I store old comments if you feel like reading them.

Comments archived from 6/23/2022
Melkor - Pretty cool profile, its really well made and you clearly put a lot of effort into it
 * - Can you add me?
 * - Alright, will do
 * - Thank you!

DragonRed Bashar Assad - Vladimir Putin Alexander Lukashenko Xi Jinping - Mao Zedong they are all great leaders. Ataturk did not commit genocide. How many times will I write? DragonRed he was a benevolent dictator.
 * - Ataturk is, but the rest are all dictatorial manaics.
 * - How many other funny jokes can you write?
 * - Ataturk wanted a democratic Turkey eventually.
 * - Mao was one of the most incompetent leaders of the 20th Century and it's crazy that he got away with it.

DragonRed There is no democracy in backward societies. In backward societies, democracy becomes nepotism, kinship, sectarianism. In backward societies, limited defensive democracy and a partially charitable and progressive dictatorship are required. He shouldn't vote for a low-intelligence primary school graduate. Everyone should have democracy in their own matter.
 * - I suggest you look up the society of the San people, they have their tribes run by a Consensus Democracy under a Ceremonial quasi-Monarchy. Okay they're tribes, but it's still a Democracy. But generally I think a Semi-Constitutional Monarchy might be the best system for most developing countries.

Alexei Navalny Volodymyr Zelenskyy Mikhail Gorbachev - Barrack Justin Trudeau-Donald Trump-Vaush McCarthy - Ronald Reagan Margaret Thatcher - Ben Shapiro - Steven Crowder - Henry Kissinger - Milton Friedman Boris Johnson George W. Bush is terrible people. '''Cringe anti-indigenist and pro-imperialist. So is American nationalism/patriotism regardless if you are a """Native""" citizen. Also state liberalism as your "troll" ideology is kinda cringe, and so is corporatism, centrism (especially), Modern social democracy, generic social-liberalism anti-anarchism, and while supporting Kurds you hate demcom despite being one of the most based ideologies and last best hopes of earth (even though I prefer individualist anarchism is still extremely based considering the circumstances) which is even more cringe.''' Yeah, this is just more cringe, I don't even want to debate this because it is just debating with a western liberal who says all the same generic pseudo-progressive talking points over and over and over and over again. Demcom is an opportunistic libtard ideology. It doesn't benefit anything. Anarchism does not work in any of its derivatives. Demcom ideology Stalin was a red fascist. Stalin was not a socialist. It is those who call themselves revolutionaries and those who play counter-revolutionaries. Stalin's mockery of socialism; who thinks he is a revolutionary, who dreams of establishing his own so-called democratic socialist revolution; counter-revolutionary oppurtunist ideology.
 * - How am I an interventionist who worships dictators? Haven’t you seen that they are joke ideologies? I am actually neutral on neoconservatism and interventionism.
 * - Maybe I misunderstood your ideology then, but you come off as quite hawkish for me. And your other comments on your page just kinda give off that.
 * - Also, there is no puritanism in Australia. I don't know what the hell you are talking about. For your comment on social authoritarianism: social fascism doesn't really exist, it is a fake term invented by tyrant Stalin to discredit social democratic parties.
 * - Oh I'm well aware social fascism doesn't exist it's more or less just a joke, and also, I'm talking about your attitudes to things like LGBT issues.
 * - Fair enough Ig.
 * - Michail Gorbachev liberated the Soviet Union and Vaush is based, cope.
 * - When was I ever pro-colonialism? I explicitly stated that I believed in self-determination of oppressed people's in the world fighting against authoritarian states. And the kurds for me are a bit mixed but I do in-general support them, even though I don't like some of the stuff that goes on there, just not too educated on the situation as a whole so. And yeah, I like corporatism and modern social democracy, which are both based.

You are waging war against authoritarian states in the world. But your own state intervenes in other countries and you applaud people's destruction of their country and exploitation of resources?Matteel '''***Then again, isn't that also everyone who disagrees with you? Also the stuff not in bold was NOT said by me. I have no idea who said it.''' - Add me? - add me
 * - What are you talking about, did you just skip the part of my page were I was protesting US foreign intervention policy?
 * - What a load of waffles. AnAnonboi is a typical SJW type Neo-Marxist brainlet.
 * - Sure thing.
 * - Alright.

- Update relations with me? '''I love how most liberals users here have ideologies that greatly align with neo-imperialism and always say how savage and backward it is for the colonized to want to have a nation and protect it from outside (imperialist) threats and even spread that hate towards more radical left-wingers, left-nationalist and alt-globalist forces alongside always try to rebrand their own liberal world order under a veneer of "progress" yet at the end of the day are always white privledged first-worlders who have no idea how their western nations systems like NATO or even the UN are intentionally made to keep the smaller countries down and are ruled by only the major (western) super powers. TLDR: COPE LIBERAL! YOU MAKE ME SICK IDENTIFYING WITH THAT IMPERIALISM WITH A MASK BS! LEFT-WING/POST-LEFT/ANARCHIST ANTI-COLONIAL HOMIES WHERE YOU AT?'''
 * - What am I supposed to be coping over? Your longwinded wall of texts that you spew out? Also, the united states contributes the most to foreign aid than any other country in the world. And the UN is similar as well, so what you're saying is wrong.
 * What you are saying is just imperialist cringe so I won't delve into it further, but with that aside I must say with that aside I must say you are a based straight who openly states he faps to catboys, femboys and twinks... I don't even know how that is even possible but it is really fucking epic and you have my full respect in that regard. 
 * - "I cannot prove you wrong so I'm not going to try to". Alright, thanks for that free victory. It's just really funny what you're saying. As I label myself as anti-colonial and anti-imperialist, you think everything is imperialism.
 * Okay... Now you're just strawmanning my points to make it seem like just because I see debating you as pointless, that I have no reasons to feel that way other than "disagree with me = silence them at all costs"
 * - You are deliberately not responding to my points because you know you cannot respond lol. Keep going on your incoherent "anti-imperialist" rants. I love to listen to it.
 * - you started the straw manning first as you called my old ideology (Retroliberalism) Cypto-State Liberal which I acknowledge my old ideology was a tad too authoritarian and too economically right was by no means state liberalism
 * Okay, both of you are coping and are swarming me because I was critiquing your ideologies. And no, I absolutely will defend my points that debating with you two is pointless. Just agree to disagree and move on already. I don't want this section to degrade into another mucho-texto war

A wall of text is something that is frowned upon in most, actually virtually all Internet societies, including forums, chat boards, and Uncyclopedia. You should not make walls of text because it can get you banned anywhere unless it is a place that encourages walls of text. I highly doubt any place does support something so irritating and annoying, but anything can exist, but not really because unless you are in heaven then that can happen. But no one actually knows that was just a hypothesis, a lame one that is. Actually not really lame. You can create a wall of text supporting site, but you would be hated if you do that, so do not. But you can if you like, but I discourage that. Now on to the actual information of walls of texts. The wall of text was invented when the Internet was invented, but actually it was slow at that time. So whenever it became fast. But there would need to be some free or not free community for people, and that community would be able to have walls of text. But that community probably wouldn't have actually invented the wall of text. So basically, no one except God and Al Gore knows when or where or how the wall of text existed/was invented. Noobs probably invented, but probably not. Who knows. Walls of texts are usually filled with a lot of useless information and junk. Information and junk can be the same, but only if the information is junk or the junk is information. But who cares. The information/junk inside a wall of text are usually related to wherever the wall of text is located, but the best walls of text, which are actually the most irritating, most eye-bleeding ones, are completely random. Walls of text usually make the reader asplode or have their eyes bleed and fall out of their sockets. A number of people can stand it, but not read them. Actually some people can stand and read them. Those people do not have short attention spans. These are boring and patient people who have no life or have all the time in their hands, which are the same, but not really. The punishment of what making walls of text varies of the strictness of the community. But it doesn't really matter. Nobody cares. Walls of texts should be free of links, different font colors, strange characters, which are those other symbols used in society, and capital letters because it ruins the whole purpose of the infamy of walls of texts. It makes them look fucking dumb and weird. Walls of texts are obviously free of huge spaces and outstanding things like capital letters. Of course, paragraphs should never be in a wall of text. Walls of text are known to create nausea, confusion, head explosion, and others. The others being something I can not think of either because I am lazy or if I do not feel like it or I can not actually think of anything. Like what the fuck? That was a rhetorical question right there. What the fuck? You are actually not requesting a satisfactory answer, you just say that because you try to be funny or you feel like it or if you are pissed off. You must get a proper bitch-slapping to stop making walls of text, but if you are weird then that doesn't apply to you. Walls of text are defeated by deleting them or splitting them into paragraphs. But who cares. The information/junk inside a wall of text are usually related to wherever the wall of text is located, but the best walls of text, which are actually the most irritating, most eye-bleeding ones, are completely random. Walls of text usually make the reader asplode or have their eyes bleed and fall out of their sockets. A number of people can stand it, but not read them. Actually some people can stand and read them. Those people do not have short attention spans. These are boring and patient people who have no life or have all the time in their hands, which are the same, but not really. The punishment of what making walls of text varies of the strictness of the community. But it doesn't really matter. Nobody cares. Walls of texts should be free of links, different font colors, strange characters, which are those other symbols used in society, and capital letters because it ruins the whole purpose of the infamy of walls of texts. It makes them look fucking dumb and weird. Walls of texts are obviously free of huge spaces and outstanding things like capital letters. Of course, paragraphs should never be in a wall of text. Walls of text are known to create nausea, confusion, head explosion, and others. The others being something I can not think of either because I am lazy or if I do not feel like it or I can not actually think of anything. Like what the fuck? That was a rhetorical question right there. What the fuck? You are actually not requesting a satisfactory answer, you just say that because you try to be funny or you feel like it or if you are pissed off. You must get a proper bitch-slapping to stop making walls of text, but if you are weird then that doesn't apply to you. Walls of text are defeated by deleting them or splitting them into paragraphs. Or some other things that would work but will take hours to think of. People are considered a nuisance if they create walls of text. This might be the end. If you hope this is the end, I am not sure. But if I was not sure then I wouldn't be talking. I should know. Or should I? The best way to make a better and good wall of text is to copy and paste what you previously typed or write. Hey, that reminds me. Wall of text aren't always on the internet! They could be anywhere that is able to produce symbols. D'oh. A wall of text is something that is frowned upon in most, actually virtually all Internet societies, including forums, chat boards, and Uncyclopedia. You should not make walls of text because it can get you banned anywhere unless it is a place that encourages walls of text. I highly doubt any place does support something so irritating and annoying, but anything can exist, but not really because unless you are in heaven then that can happen. Or some other things that would work but will take hours to think of. People are considered a nuisance if they create walls of text. This might be the end. If you hope this is the end, I am not sure. But if I was not sure then I wouldn't be talking. I should know. Or should I? The best way to make a better and good wall of text is to copy and paste what you previously typed or write. Hey, that reminds me. Walls of text aren't always on the internet! They could be anywhere that is able to produce symbols. D'oh. A wall of text is something that is frowned upon in most, actually virtually all Internet societies, including forums, chat boards, and Uncyclopedia. You should not make walls of text because it can get you banned anywhere unless it is a place that encourages walls of text. I highly doubt any place does support something so irritating and annoying, but anything can exist, but not really because unless you are in heaven then that can happen. But no one actually knows that was just a hypothesis, a lame one that is. Actually not really lame. You can created a wall of text supporting site, but you would be hated if you do that, so do not. But you can if you like, but I discourage that. Now on to the actual information of walls of texts. The wall of text was invented when the Internet was invented, but actually it was slow at that time. So whenever it became fast. But there would need to be some free or not free community for people, and that community would be able to have walls of text. But that community probably wouldn't have actually invented the wall of text. So basically, no one except God and Al Gore knows when or where or how the wall of text existed/was invented. Noobs probably invented, but probably not. Who knows. Walls of texts are usually filled with a lot of useless information and junk. Information and junk can be the same, but only if the information is junk or the junk is information. But who cares. The information/junk inside a wall of text are usually related to wherever the wall of text is located, but the best walls of text, which are actually the most irritating, most eye-bleeding ones, are completely random. Walls of text usually make the reader asplode or have their eyes bleed and fall out of their sockets. A number of people can stand it, but not read them. Actually some people can stand and read them. Those people do not have short attention spans. These are boring and patient people who have no life or have all the time in their hands, which are the same, but not really. The punishment of what making walls of text varies of the strictness of the community. But it doesn't really matter. Nobody cares. Walls of texts should be free of links, different font colors, strange characters, which are those other symbols used in society, and capital letters because it ruins the whole purpose of the infamy of walls of texts. It makes them look fucking dumb and weird and dumb. Walls of texts are obviously free of huge spaces and outstanding things like capital letters. Of course, paragraphs should never be in a wall of text. Walls of text are known to create nausea, confusion, head explosion, and others. The others being something I can not think of either because I am lazy or if I do not feel like it or I can not actually think of anything. Like what the fuck? That was a rhetorical question right there. What the fuck? You are actually not requesting a satisfactory answer, you just say that because you try to be funny or you feel like it or if you are pissed off. Now I just copied and pasted part of this huge wall of text, which is actually not. Wait what? Nice right? Ba boom a rhetorical question right there. Is this the end for the sanity of your eyes? What the fuck did you actually read up to here? Or did you skip to near the end and read this? Either way, you fail in life. Just kidding. Or was I? Oh well.
 * - Well then maybe you shouldn't be leaving your massive wall of texts as a coping mechanism then as they not intelligently written.
 * - Unfortunally for you it's too late:

NO! DragonRed nameless man who are you who are you Am m please update relations ty
 * - You know what I'm keeping that because it's funny. And also, that would be for the best because everything you say is incredibly soy.
 * - Done

- I have readded you. Readd me please? The person who you started a conspiracy over - plez update relations - Please update relations. - Do you play any musical instruments or such? Ronzipot - You are fairly based. Also add me plz '''Yeah sorry, your recent edits are cringe comparing anime drawings of moe characters to literal child abuse and exploitation, and before you go off on "a drawing of what" GTA Is a game of what? A greatly false representation of "reality" is not in any way comparable to committing literal crimes against humanity. With that aside, you do know that your "points" actually just makes pedophilia seem as something that is just "normal" because you are comparing their literal crimes against humanity to something as minimal and trivial as a person who reads pretty much ANY hentai doujin. Agree to disagree, call me any name you want from the book. I just don't see your ideas as genuine in fighting actual pedos when you have to bring anime.''' To put this comment to a close, regarding your question at the end of your comment, it is because Moe Anime Girls are not actual children, nor are they meant to reflect such by their very design. Their "moe" behavior is meant to represent an idealized and fake representation of cutesy behavior and innocence which said consumers identify themselves with rather than to represent actual children who are basically amoral and act in ways that are (to put it lightly) ass-holey. If you can't tell the difference between a real child and a thousand-year-old 2-D moe dragon with eyes the size of tangerines and act in ways that are completely unlike real children then I think you are the one with the problem. to how you have absolutely no evidence to support anything you say against me or whatever fictional fetish you hate on, and how your a bad person for a victimless crime, while you actively support the United States which is well known to actively be putting people in power or whose most powerful leaders have had worked closely with people like Jeffrey Epstein to do god knows what. Then I will point that out, how you are the one doing real damage to children by sliding these many atrocities under the rug to instead throw fits about 17.9 year old anime girls as being the greatest threat to child safety in the modern day. That is something I can't defend. Your "humanitarian aid" usually also only applies to allies of the US or who bend their knee to the US so that's also BS. \
 * - added
 * - Alright i'll do that
 * - Alright, i'll update relations here sometime tomorrow.
 * - No, never have been interested in musical instruments of any kind.
 * - Add me
 * - Alright. Will do.
 * - Y'know, i was not expecting AnaAnonBoi to come out as a lolicon, but i'm definetly not surprised, also its really great how you threw out all the parroted npc arguments all at once lmao
 * Nice strawman, playing devil's advocate isn't nor ever should be compared to being such. Even if I was, this is pure ad-hominem and ignores my points as well as how you are attacking me because you clearly don't like me and thus WANT to slander me with such things to strawman me and delegitimize my points and to further justify your own sense of being "right". Sorry if me being critical on attacking moe anime characters would actually help fight real child abuse. Something which as a victim of, absolutely despises in all of its forms. But I guess according to you my devil's advocate argument automatically makes me whatever you say I am and therefore makes me a BAD PERSON whose points are entirely invalid.
 * - I just thought it was funny
 * Sorry, but slander for the sake of it in our political climate is not something I in any way find "funny". I am all for edgy jokes, but calling someone such a thing is really dangerous to not only me but to you as well. And besides, something tells me you have greater motives to go and call me such things and go off about how my points are "wrong" and "NPC" rather than just because "its just a joke"... Sorry, I just don't get how trying to "debunk" my points is in anyway can be taken as a joke
 * - Excuse me, but what the fuck am I reading right now? I'm just flat out confused if this is trolling or not.
 * I don't know how you can take my good-faithed points as "trolling" but regardless. If I was not mistaken you vandalized a far-right users page (who regardless, that guy was still indeed very cringe and was pretty much asking for it ofc) to make it look like he was a MAP alongside being a loli/shotacon. Which to me I kinda find pretty "eh" tbh because while it could be interpreted as a joke, you pretty much compared a liking towards anime drawings to unironic pedos and child abusers, when most of those individuals are just weird fetishy otakus whose entire interest is stuff on hentai doujins and aren't even comparable to the unspeakable evil that is pedos or 14-year-old far-right cringelords whose entire ideology is based on whatever was the most insane hoi4 sub ideology but taken seriously and uses it to excuses his shitty worldviews and makes it his entire personality.
 * - Dude, I'm sorry but, out of everything I've heard come out of your long winded paragraphs you spew out, this has to be the least intelligently written one I've seen. I'm just gonna pretend that you're not implying what I think you're implying. I don't know what to say, and I'm really unsure why you are trying to die on this hill. But, how does being attracted to kids not make you a pedo?
 * Sorry, but since you seem to be so butthurt by it, I am going to have another long-winded paragraph just for you [[File:Troll.png]] Anyways, you are clearly being bad-faith to call a person who doesn't necessarily agree with you on the status of moe anime characters akin to real child abuse as supporting literal pedo actions, I don't want to have this talk because I know you won't consider another perspective let alone consider changing your mind no matter what facts I bring or if I ask for what scientific basis your supposed "facts" come from. Your claims of me standing behind such stances being akin to "dying on a hill" is simply another word for standing for what you truly believe in and not giving up because of what others think regarding the status of fiction. Sorry if I don't see eye-to-eye on that because I just see it as harming any ability to really fight real pedos and puts the finger to people who have no relation to the real pieces of shit who do such heinous acts. Also, to say my paragraphs are basically "spewed out nonsense" [and how you vandalized my writing] shows it's pretty obvious you just don't like me when all I was saying was that I didn't agree with your comparisons between a hentai trope with literal unironic pedophilia. Call me whatever word in the book if you want, but I know that such claims are absolute slander. Especially when you are using such takes to attack me when your ideals have confirmed and direct connection towards the deaths of real people such as your support of NATO which has been well documented to have led to the deaths of numerous amounts of innocent men, women, and even children. If you want to claim I am the one putting kids in danger because I am playing devil's advocate towards the stance of anime drawings not being equivalent to real child abuse, then why are you not putting that same concern towards real-world situations that have and continue to directly cause the suffering deaths of countless amounts of REAL children? Maybe because it only matters wto you hen it is something you don't like or which political side you align with rather than the legitimate devastation it causes to real people. I am done with this conversation (unless you vandalize my page further then I will just remove it) because you are so bad-faith you can't even have a fact-based conversation about such topics without vandalizing my arguments to say things that I am not. I don't care if I am "spewing nonsense" to you, because having to stoop so low as to vandalize people is far worse in a debate based on rationality and common consensus.
 * - Well, firstly. I believe that pedophilia as a mental illness should be destigmatized (explicitly the mental illness, not the act you're thinking of) as it doesn't mean you're gonna be a child rapist, so those with said condition can actually seek help without their entire lives being destroyed with it. So, I don't see how enabling it is going to help anything, even if it isn't harming anyone. And those anime characters and designed like children so they are children, it doesn't matter if its fictional or not, it's still children. And, I'm really confused we even got to this point in the first place on a wiki about politics. Also, imagine making up the point that I vandalized what you said just to invalidate your comment just so you could do some meaningless "gotcha".
 * '''Firstly, yes, it is a "gotcha" to point out how you are being dishonest and unwilling to hold rational debate by vandalizing a person who disagrees with you and to paint them into some pro-pedo advocate. That is slander, and looks really bad for you, secondly, the term "Enabling" is just funny, especially when you are so dedicated to hate on a victimless crime with an unfounded "point" thirdly, I already told you it looks nothing like a child and you completely glossed over that. What child is a hyper-moe anime waifu with eyes the size of tangerines? And fourth, As I said before, you completely ignore that your argument is the same violent-videogames, anti-furry, and anti-porn, fetish, guro etc. activists use towards "enabling" violent or other "degenerate" behaviors despite there being absolutely no evidence on that. If you want to make such claims give scientifically validated studies, the burden of proof is on YOU to confirm... NOT me... Otherwise I would be far more respectful your point if you were consistent in your argument rather than shying away from how your argument is legit no different from hating on hyper-realistic violence in games. After all you kill innocent civilians in games like hatred, GTA or postal to where it's expected and made light of, yet said gamers have absolutely no proof it makes them "more violent" whatever fear-mongering propaganda that is. And finally you also completely glossed over my most important point, that why are you throwing stones from a glass house when you attack hypothetical child abuse (or at least serves as a gateway to child abuse) with no scientific backing rather than the well documented abuse of actual children by groups you openly defend such as NATO? As I said you're inconsistent with your views because it really isn't about "fighting pedophilia" or "doing what is truly right", it seems clear to me you just don't like it because it is a really taboo fetish which I agree with, but that doesn't make it evil or those people who enjoy such things "pedos" and only gives more ammo to the real pedos who make it seem like anything you do that's outside of the norm makes you a pedo and thus their actions are excusable. I didn't WANT to have to do this, but when you throw such slanderous lies to where you resort to calling me a "pedo-defender" and vandalizes me over it based clearly on your distaste towards a taboo fetish, rather than an actual desire to protect kids, in places where they actually face abuse (such as groups by NATO) I get fairly upset.'''
 * - LMAO. Ok, let's just ignore all the humanitarian work the United States has contributed too, and the peace these alliances have created (which would save millions of deaths). And, they are designed like Children, what you're saying isn't comparable as I'm not parroting anti-porn arguments, because I think they are retarded. You're just grasping for straws as a way to justify whatever weird shit you're into, in that case, I don't even wanna know. And, once again, I never vandalized what you've said, stop saying that, lying in an argument is an emission of guilt.
 * "The United States has ensured peace across the world" that logic is simply absurd if you did even a bit of google searching. The US is one of (if not the) the greatest leaders in establishing right-wing dictatorships against democracies in all of history. You go off about how I am "grasping at straws" yet it isn't really grasping at straws if I am pointing out your obvious hypocrisy
 * - Look, this is just flat out the most retarded argument I've gotten into in this wiki, like I'm so lost for words right now. And I really cannot be fucked to argue about US aid and its allies. So, liking children at the end of the day is pedophilla, no ends, ands, or butts, and it is immoral to do that. Seeing as you don't even want good faith arguing by making up points just to slander my case, this is just going to continue going back and fourth with no conclusion.
 * When you have to ignore all my points and act like I am being retarded when you continually ignore how I keep telling you that you have no evidence to any such claims and how you play dumb to my points such as the fact you've been vandalizing people, which even the mods know about. Then for once I agree, this debate is pointless and none of us are going to go anywhere so why bother.


 * [[File:Silasf.png]] Silas: How did you become a patriot/nationalist? That would probably be the most unexpected ideology change for you.
 * - Well, I genuinely do like the West, so I thought that patriotism was the most logical to adopt. Still cosmopolitan in my views if you couldn't tell, just think that it isn't a bad idea to at least adopt some form of pride. Along with just coming to the realization that multiculturalism doesn't work the best with social democracy, and that Interculturalism would be a better fit. Looking at the nordic countries and how the center-left parties have stayed in power, this has a role to play, so I thought adopting that would just make logical sense. I honestly just feel like you're arguing just to be contrarian to me.

- hey update relations also what your biggest issue with my ideology
 * - Alright. And the biggest issues would have to be south Floridian separatism, since I'm very much not keen on state independence. As well as the socialism bit, as I'm still economically capitalist. Other than that, there's not much to complain about.
 * - I have sent request to you longtime ago,pls see your notification and add me.
 * - Alright, will do.
 * - What do you think about [[FIle:PanBrit.png]] ?
 * - Pretty based, but tone down the ethnocentrism.
 * Userwiki:Marsvner - dude I have to tell you that in a revisionist and repressive state like China we gotta implement a brand new revolutionary culture to bash the damn old establishment and its residue even after revolution in favor of buliding an democratic and socialist state.It's obvious we need to be revolutionary progressive to bash the old patriachy,repressive confucian culture and bureaucraticism that may emerge again.In your country things are more complicated that you may not need to be culturally revolutionary in current.So pls not blame me for taking progressivism too far😣
 * [[File:Silasf.png]] Silas: Considering the amount of damage the original Cultural Revolution did to China, I don't think having a second one would work out very well.

- Literal ideology hoarder lmfaoooooo (also add me )


 * - add me

- Remember to add me when you get the chance. DragonRed what happened to you ? You were anti-nationalist. You have become a pan nationalist.
 * - I'll do that right now
 * - I became nationalist in terms of immigration, but not on the same levels of places like Hungary.