UserWiki:Hellothere314

Beliefs
You can see my ideology on my PCBA page

Q&A
Feel free to add questions

Relations
This is all based on ideology and philosophy, I might like someone a lot personally but disagree substantially on ideology.

Based

 * - Duh.
 * - You are quite right that the unique cannot be treated as anything as it is non nature. That is a misconception in the phrasing of my argument on my part. When I referred to the unique in my previous argument I meant that the nature we place onto the unique, which of course is pure abstraction to place frameworks to the chaotic void. Just as one's name is not the contents of the unique but rather a forced concept on top of it. However when considering the one and the all as forced natures, and considering my previous argument the point stands. In terms of embracing the unique, I mean the embracing of the deteritorialization and rhizomatic analysis of all we place on the unique.
 * [[File:Affiliated-New.png]]Affiliated - Page is pretty bare but you're a fellow Deleuze lover!
 * [[File:ChronicNietzsche.png]]ChronicLuna - Nietzschian philosophy is amazing and we agree a lot on politics. Very based.
 * - Existentialism is based, only going off what others say as your page is bare.
 * [[File:TipuiSmall2.png]]Tipui - A mix of individualist and collectivist philosophies, paired with egoism is great.

Good

 * - I like much of your political stances, yet your association with lacan is troubling, though you haven't elaborated much on it.
 * - Ego-communism as a political goal is generally good, as the synthesis and deteritorialization of the poles of ontology requires an effort not only from the ego but from the outside as well. Your ethics though have some problems, hedonism is fine as an exorcism of self interest, yet placing any moral value makes one a slave to desire.
 * [[File:Clover.png]]Bsaheed527 - Post-Leftism generally is pretty good as it seeks to move beyond the ideological boundries of leftism. Besides that your ideas don't seem that constructed, though mutualism is alright as an economic framework, though it can easily turn into a commodity system if one lets oneself be sucumbed to the spectacle of the market.
 * [[File:NguyenreichismIcon.png]]Nguyenreich - Best orthodox marxist on here by far. While I'm personally an anarchist, I've always held a respect for council communism and left communism in general. Your understanding of dialectics in the marxist sense has the same problems of Marx's understanding of dialectics, that being the placement of survival on a purely material plane, associating the production focused nature of capitalism to apply to all stages of society. Overall you're pretty good.
 * [[File:Postniv.png]]Niveous Laccolith - Neoluddism makes good critiques, but has the wrong solutions. Besides that all the other philosophy and political stuff is based.
 * [[File:Arthurwp soulism.png]]Arthurwp - LordCompost's critique of you confusing economic property for hegelian property is certainly correct. Besides that you're a fellow ego-com and post-leftism is good. Pretty good, though some of you're positions don't have much expressed justification.

Fine

 * - I appreciate my environment based on my being in the world, and how I directly rely on it, not on some sacred cause.
 * [[File:SituBlart.png]]Blart - Syndicalism, even only in practice, creates a structure that creates some abstraction of communitarianism, which in the sensablilty of Voyer is inherantly embroiled in spectacle, wich you claim to go against. Your conception of spectacle is narrow, failing to see the capitalist mode of spectacle as a subset of a larger concept.
 * [[File:Ashley.png]]AshleyHere - Your ideology is fine, basically an average anarcho-narcho with a bit of individualist flair. Could be worse.
 * [[File:GIFSolarwave+.gif]]Solarwave - Anarcho-Communism is alrigh, and Existentialist Anarchism is great, but platformism is cringe.

Neutral

 * [[File:SamKibGuy icon .png]]SamKibGuy - Kinda an ismism but anti-authoritarianism is good.

Meh

 * [[File:Yoda8soup.png]]Yoda8soup - The economics of Wolff suck. Wolff assumes that the reasons behind capitalism's problem is the boss not the firm. Commodity production still goes on when the workers are behind the wheel. At least you're anti-authoritarian.

Bad

 * [[File:Neoairisu.png]]SumisuAirisu - Bookchinite, what more do I have to say.

Cringe

 * [[File:LeninisBasedsmall.png]]Leninisbased556 - Average Marxist-Leninist.

Comments

 * - Comment if you want to discuss or be added.


 * - Add me?