UserWiki:Yoda8soup

Test Results

 * The Political Sextant Quiz

Classical Marxism 100%

De Leonism 90%

Marxist feminism 100%


 * 6Foundations

Care: 27 / 30

Fairness: 27 / 30

Loyalty: 13 / 30

Authority: 11 / 30

Sanctity: 13 / 30

Liberty: 20 / 30

Estimated Ideology: Libertarian Socialism


 * NewValues

Economic Axis: Socialist

Diplomatic Axis: Balanced leaning internationalist

Civil Axis: Liberal

Societal Axis: Very Progressive

Closest Match: Democratic Socialism


 * 8 Values

Economic Axis: Socialist,

Diplomatic Axis: Internationalist,

Civil Axis: Libertarian

Societal Axis: Very Progressive,

Closest Match: Libertarian Socialism,


 * LeftValues

Neutral: Revolution-54.4% Reform-45.6%

Very Scientific: Scientific-78.1% Utopian-21.9%

Decentralist: Central-31.7% Decentral-68.3%

Internationalist: International-62.5% National-37.5%

Unionist: Party-34.6% Union-65.4%

Ecological: Production-27.85% Nature-72.2%

Progressive: Conservative-27.9% Progressive-72.1%

Closest Match: Centrist Marxism


 * SapplyValues


 * DozenValues


 * LiberationValues

Political evolution
????-2016

2016-2018

2018-2020

2020-halfway through 2020

halfway through 2020-2021

2021-halfway through 2021

halfway through 2021-2022

2022-present

Flag Of My Ideology
 * Representing Unity Democracy Socialism and Environmentalism.



My Broad Beliefs

 * Economics - The economy would be decentral and the workers would own the means of production. The economy would be a regulated socialist market economy similar to that of Yugoslavia. Paired with a syndicalist economy based on worker self-management/workplace democracy with strong unions and semi-direct syndicalist/council democracy. small businesses of 15-20 workers could be run like private businesses but to grow any bigger the business would have to become a co-op or be run using a syndicalist form of worker self-management but all large businesses would have unions. and all States/provinces would through a syndicalist democracy structure elect representatives by popular vote to the parliament or assembly and then the parliament would run on a kind of semi-direct democracy giving more power to the people than the representative I go more into depth on reps in government. There would be some local democratic planning similar to that of the Inca’s storehouses or Rojava’s decentralized planning. So each community can keep a reserve to survive hardship and that ensures resource security and community self-reliance. Not to be confused with central planning. And on top of all that, there would be a land value tax and a progressive tax to fund the welfare system that would provide socialized healthcare quality public education and public housing developments these housing complexes would be similar to the Viennese style which would include clinics schools markets art studios and communal gardens. The economy would be regulated to ensure environmental protection. And similar to bull moose progressivism if harmful economic forces formed like trusts they would be broken.


 * Government - Natural rights would be at the heart of government and the government would follow the three principles of the people and a five power constitution and be a federal republic. With a control branch for auditing, an examination branch to rake for corruption and ensure the efficiency of public programs, Judicial would oversee the justice system and ensure rehabilitation comes first but also that there is due process, legislative would be the legislature that would be run with semi-direct democracy there would be representatives with term limits elected to a bicameral parliament/assembly through a syndicalist form of semi-direct democracy to ensure that the interests of the people come first and government representatives would have a better understanding of their people because they would be elected from their ranks rather than distant oligarchs and bureaucrats and could be voted out by popular vote at any time, the executive would be voted in by popular vote and all branches including executive would have checks and balances and a division of power and term limits to ensure accountability and keep corruption down. The philosophy of government would be the 3 principles of the people meaning the government would ensure unity and equality like the doctrine of Nationalism, and control of government by the people like the doctrine of Democracy, and welfare and happy and sustainable living like the doctrine of Socialism. Law enforcement would be similar to community policing like in Rojava to ensure that the police would be accountable to the community and represent their community and have heavy community regulation to curb any police brutality. Natural rights would be held dearly to governance.


 * Social - Multiculturalism would be welcome and there would be universal suffrage and equal rights for everybody regardless of race gender or creed. Drugs would be decriminalized and rather than be punished as a crime addicts would have the opportunity of rehab. Racism and other forms of prejudice would be looked down upon and fierce counter education would be used to ensure that hate would not spread because the society would be educated enough to see its flaws and harmful effect and would reject it. The line between free speech and hate speech would be drawn if what you are saying is threatening or abusive and prejudiced it will be censored because you would be hurting other's rights in the society and this would protect free speech by ensuring that harmful abuses of the right would not corrupt the freedom of speech. The government would focus on securing domestic affairs and then once the economy is thriving and functioning at home then things like international aid to nations in need would be pursued but the people of the country would come first. Offensive war would be heavily avoided but there would be military to fight defensive wars and ensure national security. with the question of the environment, I believe a Buhtan/Teddy Roosevelt approach would be good not only would fossil fuels be abandoned in favour of geothermal, wind, hydro, solar, etc. But also a massive government project would be undertaken to plant more trees and I say this because Buhtan the only carbon negative country is that way because of its huge forests and largely renewable energy sourcing. The Roosevelt part would come in by the government regulating co-ops and small businesses in the market socialist structure to ensure eco-friendliness but also conservation reserves would be set up by the government to preserve land and protect it from abuse. A culture of environmentalism would be encouraged and people would be educated about the dangers of high carbon emissions and environmental destruction and encouraged to do what they could to help and how to be a part of larger ecological change.

Influences
Sun Yat-sen

Three Principles of the People/Tridemism,

Social Georgism,

Anti- fascism,

Anti-Authoritarianism,

Luxemburgism/Progressive,

Bull Moose Progressivism,

Abraham Lincoln,

DeLeonism/Green Syndicalism,

Geosyndicalism,

Marxism,

Slavoj Žižek,

Centrist Marxism,

Frankfurt Socialism,

Hegel,

Buddhist Socialism

Indigenism

The Iroquois Confederacy inspired a lot of my political views and I have a deep respect for the Iroquois and all-around Native American civilization because of my experiences growing up for part of my childhood in the Navajo Nation.

Incan decentrally planned economy,

Neozapatismo,

Democratic Confederalism,

Bookchin Communalism,

Environmentalism,

Workplace Democracy,

Titoism,

Eco Socialism,

Democracy,

Socialism of the 21st Century,

Malcolm X,

Black Panthers,

Martin Luther King Jr.

W.E.B DuBois,

Ho Chi Minh Thought,

Regulated Market/Co-op Socialism,

Social Distributism(secular and only for its economic structure),

Noam Chomsky,

Anarcho-Syndicalism,

Richard Wolff,

Athenian Democracy/Classical and ancient Greek philosophy,

George Orwell,

Liberal Socialism,

Bernie Sanders,

Nelson Mandela,

Mikhail Gorbachev,

Leon Trotsky,

Constitutionalism(Sun Yat-Sens 5 power constitution),

Republicanism,

Mustafa Kemal Ataturk,

Federalism,

Presidentialism,

Parliamentarianism,

Family
Mum

Dad

mums boyfriend

dads wife who sucks and is kinda racist

girlfriend

one of my best friends

Based
M99: Really based fellow democratic leftist internationalist anti-imperialist socialist and workplace democracy! Seems to be a nice person and I agree with just about all of your ideology I look forward to learning from you. :D

UserWiki:SamKibGuy: very based socialist pro-democracy progressive anti-authoritarian loves Sun Yat-Sen and Luxemburg too! I'm happy to call you Comrade! :D


 * very based economics based ecosocialism I agree with most of what you are saying and you seem very nice I'm excited to learn from you. :)


 * Pretty based I'm a fan of civil libertarianism progressivism and semi-direct democracy. Social democracy is ok you seem nice and I'm looking forward to learning from you. :)


 * I don't know much about anarcho-nihilism but anti-authoritarianism is based and you are nice and you made my icon so thank you. :D


 * Tridemism and Environmentalism are very based and Social Democracy is ok and Transhumanism is cool you seem nice.

ComradeRabbit95: Extremely based economics I would totally live in your utopia I agree with most all of your views and you seem like a nice guy and I like your ball I hope to learn from you in the future. :D

UserWiki:Skyrum536: Incredibly based ideology multiculturalism, progressivism, environmentalism, federalism, pacifism, liberation theology, and Democratic Socialism and your view on markets is great I agree with everything you identify with I'm so excited to learn about your beliefs comrade. :D


 * Very based economics and views on federal republic and council democracy I'm very excited to learn from you. :D

IvarsBalodis: Your economics are super based and I'm cool with ProgCon and left-wing nationalism and your Russia-Ukraine POV is mega based I'm eager to learn from you. :)


 * Everything you are for is based and you seem nice im really looking forward to learning about you. :D

Neutral

 * Deep ecology is very based and I am quite a fan of environmentalism myself but I'm not so sure about pre-industrial society though. but you seem really nice and I'm interested in learning from you. :)

Bman: Tridemism and Marxism are based but ML is kinda cringe.


 * based anti-authoritarian and anti-racist but liberal capitalism is a bit cringe but you seem really nice so I'm happy to learn what I can from you. :)


 * Distributism is interesting and civic liberalism is based but monarchism and religion in government is cringe.

Nekoqing: Fellow left-KMT enjoyer very based a little too authoritarian but you seem like a good person and I'm eager to learn about your beliefs. :)


 * Based environmentalist and fellow TikTok hater but authoritarianism and culturally right is a bit cringe you seem like a nice person and you made my template thank you.

NazBolGANG12: Distributism is interesting and somewhat based but I’m not a fan of monarchism or conservatism and I believe in the separation of church and state. but you seem nice and i look forward to learning from you :)


 * You were one of the first people I saw on this site and I want to learn more about egoism but I think environmentalism LGBT neo marxism and situationism are based and you seem nice so I look forward to learning from you.


 * Social Georgism democracy and progressivism is based liberalism is ok and you seem nice.

- I don't know much about egoism but you seem nice and anti-authoritarianism is based so I'm excited to learn from you. :)


 * culturally left is pretty based but liberal capitalism leads to alienation and poverty.

The Iced: Georgism Democracy and culturally left are based but capitalism is a mood killer.


 * I like centrist marxism and ecosocialism but state socialism Juche Maoism and anti-LGBTQ+ are pretty cringe.

Anonymous21: Environmentalism social democracy and all your antis are mega-based but reactionary traditionalism and deceleration are a bit cringe but you seem really nice so I'm excited to talk to you. :)

DragonRed: State capitalism, One party State, and police statism is horrifically cringe. Marksoc Socgeo demsoc syndicalism civil libertarianism and ecosoc are pretty cool but you are way too authoritarian and a little too nationalistic for my taste.

Cringe
PaleoFabius: Fascism and culturally right is really cringe and genocidal governments are always cringe and your influences are sus as hell but you seem like an ok person.

Reactionary Populism: we have mutual respect for Sun Yat-Sen which is based but culturally right and that type of nationalist which is a bit cringe but you seem very nice and despite our opposing views on many cultural topics I'm eager to learn from you. :)


 * Culturally right authoritarian and state socialist is kinda spooky but we share a liking for Ho Chi Minh and you seem like a nice person I'm interested in learning about your beliefs more in the future. :)


 * environmentalism is epic and based but fascism is really cringe, so is not liking Democracy.


 * Objectivism and capitalism are flawed and cringe I know so many American right-libertarians and I'm friends with many of them and in my opinion, your ideologies economic system creates inequity and under it, the working class suffers and gets abused by the capital owners and the system eats itself so mega cringe. but you seem nice.


 * Zionism is mega cringe basically ethnonationalism also I believe in the separation of church and state and also I dislike genocide and what Israel is doing to Palestine is awful so yea Free Palestine!

SNEEDIVS: You are incredibly cringe and your ideology is awful. Just about everything you are for I'm against. But I do like Roman history Roman Republic, the Roman Empire, the HRE, and Byzantium its all fascinating.

- Awful ideology liking Russia is cringe and authoritarianism mixed with capitalism is a nightmare and your homophobic and transphobic which is backyards but you seem like an ok person though.

SomeCrusader: very cringe I know so many Christian conservatives like you and they are always contradictory and small-minded but I hope that I can learn from you and maybe you will be different.

Comments

 * - I'll clear old comments.

IvarsBalodis - Add me?
 * - Added:)

DragonRed

It can be both federal and unitary. mine is a regional state. Regions with decentralized administration separated by geographical features. There is also a central government.
 * - oh ok I can agree with that sentiment I also believe in states with a national gov protecting and holding them together.

[[UserWiki:DragonRed|DragonRed Why Am I against the democratic conference in Rojova? I will tell you. Because it is against the nation-state. Why did Afghanistan become the Taliban? Because it was not a nation-state.
 * - Ok. Rojava and Afghanistan are two very different situations and personally, I believe that Afghanistan was more of an example of the US being a destabilizing and imperial force because the Taliban when it was the Mujahideen got US funding and recourses. You can disagree with Rojava that's your choice I'm not looking to change your mind.

DragonRed

I changed my ideology. Comment me again.
 * - i updated it :)

DragonRed

If I had been born in America, I wouldn't have been too authoritarian, too nationalistic. Marksoc Socgen would defend demsoc unions, civil libertarianism and ecosoc.Actually, I'm not very nationalistic. illegal immigrants; when he invaded the country; Nationalism is necessary to defend the rights of local citizens. But not to invade someone else's land. I am moderate with authority. Security comes before freedom. If there is no security, it ends in freedom. I am culturally liberalist on most things.
 * - immigration is good and I agree to an extent with security before freedom but I think there's a good balance to it. and being a civic liberal is based.

DragonRed It's bad if there are too many illegal immigrants. I am not against immigrants, but they should be limited to a certain extent and should not be illegal and should be placed in a planned manner. In the police state; overthrow the regime, protect against the reactionaries, liquidate them; I thought it was necessary. The one-party state would actually be from technocratic rulers for economic control. Apart from this, there are 6 political parties. These are the national party for workers' rights; feminist party for women's rights; green party to protect the environment; unhindered party for the welfare of the rights of persons with disabilities; student party for student rights; An animal lovers party will be held to protect the animals. These 6 political parties will discuss the issues on a civic and social axis. There will be experts gathered in a single party on the economic axis. From the bottom up, it will be the organization. There will be a scoring system.
 * - i don't like central planning and i want the workers to own the means of production, not a select few technocrats.

DragonRed

technocrats will likely be from the educated working class. Why should we entrust everything to the working class? Just because it is in the working class, let's entrust everything to the lumpen working class. Dude, the working class is not rational. The working class, in an economic sense, should participate in part in governing. Those who have worker consciousness; rational ones; should control the economy; they should participate in the administration. The working class should only be consulted on things related to social and civic axis. Political parties are necessary for this. centrally planned economies; quite successful. Take bureaucratic precautions. Reduce bureaucracy. Let the wages of the civil servants be reduced, the wages of the workers increased. The officer should not only be given a desk job. central economy; If everything is collected in one hand, it will develop fast. The important thing is to control it. For this, a non-governmental organization is required.
 * - the workers would own the MOP democratically and every centrally planned economy has either failed or devolved into authoritarian capitalism it can be efficient for temporary development of underdeveloped countries but central planning doesn't meet the needs of the people.

DragonRed Central planning is successful. More successful than capitalism. You forget to compare. Russia, China, underdeveloped or late developing countries. Be it Western Europe or the USA, they started early. But if we look at the development rate, the development rates of China and Russia were higher. In other words, the land of the peasant master of your system; distribute to the villages. I expropriated the lands; I end unemployment by putting experts. There are many types of planning. You can search it on Wikipedia. Problematic means of production; Who it belongs to and how it is used is important. Even China has not stopped planning. They use indicative planning.

DragonRed

central planning to meet people's needs; following up-to-date technologies; it needs to renew itself. Now we have the technology made in the industry at our disposal. We predict from the weather. We can even irrigate deserts and do agriculture. For the ocean; can turn it into water. We can also solve the energy problem. Even a product we buy; Even the center will know.
 * - I said that central planning is good for building underdeveloped countries but it's not sustainable china became state capitalism and the USSR collapsed and Russia is now a corrupt authoritarian capitalist state. and im not advocating for capitalism im advocating for market socialism with local planning. capitalism does this too which is why central planning and capitalism are awful in my opinion because yes both systems grow and develop countries and economies but in both systems, there is a toll that the people pay the great leap forward had a conservative estimate of 15 million people died from famine and if you've read about the industrial revolution then you'll see why capitalism is no better

DragonRed

I can't start with central planning. I'll start with indicative planning. State capitalism of the system; I'm advocating a mix of social corparatism (the treaties make it easy.) and market socialism. means of production heavy industry; agricultural lands and livestock farms, education, health, transportation, distribution services will be given to the state. Light industry and other services will be private. The state will lead and supervise.
 * - I can agree with health education water housing and transportation being sate provided but I believe other industries should either be syndicalist industries co-ops or small businesses all would have government regulation. so your economic view is kind of like mine but more radical and statist.

DragonRed What are the benefits of cooperatives?.
 * - they allow workers to run the industry democratically and give the workers their worth allowing for corporations to exist humanly.

DragonRed Heavy industry production vehicles; farmland and livestock farms; be cooperatives. Let the state have education, health, transportation and distribution services. Let the light industry and other services be private. The state will manage and control.Have highly regulated market socialism. does this happen now?I'm not really authoritarian. I'm not very liberal either. I am balanced on the civilian side. Only certain things should have limits and be more moderate. I changed my views on Rojava. I neither oppose nor support it.
 * - ok so we have similar economics there are only a few differences. you are a lot more central about your economics than I am.

DragonRed I advocate indicator planning. Nothing happens without a plan. What are you against? plan command economy. I'm not defending him. There is a difference. I advocate regulated market socialism. It will be controlled by cooperatives. I support unions within the state. Because it makes deals easier.
 * - that seems pretty based to me your just a bit too much state you can read my economics if your confused.


 * Alignments=