UserWiki:Matteel

Hello, and welcome to my page! My ideology is, the self-insert of the user  Matteel. Mattism is civically liberal,  democratic,  culturally progressive, economically  center-left, militarily  non-Interventionist,  patriotic,  left-populist, and diplomatically  cosmopolitan.

Overall, his beliefs emphaize the right of the individual,  class collaberationism,  international co-operation, and  societal justice. Seeking to create a more fair society for both the economically disadvantaged and the socially disadvantaged. While, wanting economic fairness for the world at large, and to further the efforts of globalizing democracy to create fair societies oppressed under authoritarian rule,  which will bring about world peace.

[[File:Consti.png]] Introduction [[File:Consti.png]]
Matteel has been a lurker on the subreddit ever since 2021 and a user of this wiki since the old one got shut down (I hadn't made an account at the time), and around summer started being active on it. I've contributed to both r/polcompball and to r/polcompballanarchy and I'm flaired as Social Democracy on the offical subreddit.

Governmental Views

 * [[File:Liberal_Democracy.png]] Liberal Democracy


 * [[File:Fed.png]] Federalism


 * [[File:Semidirect.png]] Semi-Direct Democracy


 * [[File:Semiprez.png]] Semi-Presidential System


 * [[File:DefDem.png]] Defensive Democracy


 * [[File:Reform.png]] Reformism (In democracies)


 * [[File:Revolution.png]] Revolution (in autocracies)


 * [[File:Republicanismpix.png]] Republicanism


 * [[File:Secular.png]] Secularism


 * [[File:Lpop.png]] Left-Wing Populism


 * [[File:Civilib.png]] Civic Liberalism

Economic Views

 * [[File:Neocorporatism.png]] Neo-Corporatism
 * [[File:Tripartism.png]] Class Cooperation
 * [[File:Demcorp.png]] Democratic Representation
 * [[File:Dirigisme.png]] Dirigisme
 * [[File:Statecap.png]] Planned Capitalism
 * [[File:Lange.png]] Lange Model
 * [[File:Cooperative Socialism.png]] Encouraged Cooperative Economy


 * [[File:Regulationism.png]] Economic Regulationism


 * [[File:Welf.png]] Welfare Statism


 * [[File:Keynes.png]] Mixed Market Economy


 * [[File:EconProg.png]] Economic Progressivism


 * [[File:Georgist.png]] Public Land Ownership
 * [[File:Socgeo.png]] Welfare Georgism

Foreign Views

 * [[File:Internation.png]] Internationalism
 * [[File:ProgressiveInternationalismIcon.png]] Progressive Internationalism
 * [[File:World.png]] Globalism
 * [[File:Globnat.png]] Alter-Globalism
 * [[File:Cosmo.png]] Cosmopolitanism
 * [[File:Ecoglob.png]] Environmental Globalization
 * [[File:Postconan.png]] Anti-Colonialism
 * [[File:Pac.png]] Non-Interventionism
 * [[File:Protect.png]] Fair-Trade Protectionism (Small tariffs)
 * [[File:Leftnat.png]] Left-Wing Nationalism


 * [[File:Cball-Taiwan.png]] Pro-ROC


 * [[File:Native.png]] Indigenous Rights


 * [[File:Cball-Ukraine.png]] Pro-Ukraine


 * [[File:Cball-Kosovo.png]] Pro-Kosovan Independence
 * [[File:Cball-Albania.png]] Albanian Reunification


 * [[File:Demcon.png]] Pro-Kurdish Independence
 * [[File:AntiBaath.png]] Anti-Assad

Two State Solution
 * [[File:Antizion.png]] Anti-Zionism
 * [[File:Zio.png]] Pro-Israeli State
 * [[File:Cball-Palestine.png]] Pro-Palestinian State
 * [[File:Secular.png]] Anti-Hamas


 * [[File:Euroscept.png]] Soft Euroskepticism


 * [[File:Atlanticism.png]] Pro-West
 * [[File:Necon.png]] Pro-NATO Membership
 * [[File:Intercult.png]] Interculturalism (In terms of Immigration)


 * [[File:Pan-Nationalism.png]] Pan-Nationalism
 * [[File:Panhumanism.png]] Pan-Humanism
 * [[File:PanAmer.png]] Pan-Americanism
 * [[File:Euronaticon.png]] Pan-Europeanism
 * [[File:Panscan.png]] Pan-Scandinavism
 * [[File:Panocea.png]] Pan-Oceanianism

Cultural Views

 * [[File:SocialProgressive.png]] Social Progressivism


 * [[File:Civnat.png]] Civic Nationalism


 * [[File:Civlibert.png]] Civil Libertarianism


 * [[File:Gay.png]] Pro-LGBTQ+


 * [[File:FreeSpeak.png]] Freedom of Speech


 * [[File:Indiv.png]] Individualism
 * [[File:DvPermission.png]] Permissive Society
 * [[File:7AA75006-F094-416A-8824-CCA033321FA3.png]] Drug Legalization/Decriminalization


 * [[File:Utility.png]] Rule Utilitarianism


 * [[File:Humanismpix.png]] Humanism


 * [[File:Fem.png]] Feminism
 * [[File:Menslibnoears.png]] Men's Liberation
 * [[File:Pro-ChoiceRemade.png]] Pro-Choice


 * [[File:MLK_Jr.png]] Racial Egalitarianism


 * [[File:CapAnti_Clerical.png]] Anti-Clericalism


 * [[File:Polycult.png]] Polyculturalism (In terms of cultures within society)

Philosophical Views

 * [[File:Moral.png]] Moralism
 * [[File:Consequentialism.png]] Consequentialism
 * [[File:Utility.png]] Utilitarianism
 * [[File:Humanismpix.png]] Humanism
 * [[File:Indiv.png]] Individualism
 * [[File:Pragmat.png]] Pragmaticism
 * [[File:MoralUni.png]] Moral Universalism
 * [[File:Cosmo.png]] Cosmopolitanism
 * [[File:Antinil.png]] Anti-Nihilism
 * [[File:Hedonism-cloud.png]] Hedonism
 * [[File:Materialism.png]] Materialism
 * [[File:Constructivist.png]] Constructivism
 * [[File:Pop.png]] Populism

[[File:Utility.png]] Utilitarianism [[File:Utility.png]]
My morality comes from Utilitarianism, I believe that morality should be looked through a lens of what causes the most and least harm to individuals. The ethical theory of utilitarianism is a theory that is a branch of consequentialism by John Stuart Mill, that states that actions should be judged based on how much good or harm an action causes. And as such, actions and policies should be looked and lens that to increase the happiness of individuals and decrease suffering. This can largely sum up my views on welfare and state regulation in the economy. As, I view welfare as necessary for the creation of a happy society free from inequality and poverty. If equality of opportunity can be achieved through this, then that creates a happier population overall, and economic statistics overall back this as a fact.

[[File:MoralUni.png]] Moral Universalism [[File:MoralUni.png]]
My moral universalism comes from my cosmopolitanism and utilitarianism, I believe these ethical theories could be applied globally to all humans regardless of their status. With this, I'm opposed to moral nihilism or moral relativism. Believing that, if something creates happiness, then it has moral worth. Something like human rights, for example, should be applied universally for all countries, as these rights are what grant others right to have a good life free from persecution. The same could be applied to hedonism or some other form of consequentialist theory that is related to utilitarianism. As, everyone should be able to feel happiness and well being, and that should be the basis for morality globally.

[[File:Hedonism.png]] Hedonism [[File:Hedonism.png]]
Humans as a speices are naturally hedonistic, to how hedonistic we are to a degree varies from person to person. But, to deny that you don't enjoy the fun in life is a flat out lie. In this case, I'm going to enjoy myself regardless of what other people think, as I see no reason not to serve my own interests. And, before someone says that is "degenerate and selfish", like I said previously, I don't care. I don't tell anyone else what to do, you are of no authority to tell me what to do. It's called basic human respect to be mindful of others. I don't give a shit what your false sense of morality says I can or cannot do, if my harmless fun bugs you, then good, cope and seethe. I won't get into the specific details of what I do for fun, as that's pretty personal, but you can probably imagine anyways, so I don't even need to tell you. I wouldn't be embarrassed either way, as I will pursue my own personal hobbies and interests regardless of what people think of me for doing so.

[[File:Materialism.png]] Materialism [[File:Materialism.png]]
Religion has never played any role in my life, nor has it ever interested me in any sort of way that would actually get me to read theological books. So, I've always seen the world through a material lens. Because, If it wasn't obvious enough by the fact I label myself as a gnostic atheist, I am extremely materialistic myself and always have been due to the fact that theological explanations of the world have never interested me or have made any sense. So, not only do I not believe in any spiritually or the equivalent, I know for a fact that it isn't real. With this, I believe that materialism, which is a philosophical monism that relates to the concept of existence, is an objective fact. Now, one might say that this way of thinking is flawed, I would say, I don't care. Theology is boring as shit to me, so I will never read any theological books, nor do I have any reason to. And, even if I did, I would still have the same outlook on life just due to the fact that materialism explains the world better to me than any theological explanation does. Even if there is no way I can actually prove this, I have no reason to believe in the former, so I'm more inclined to believe in later due to it sounding more plausible and making more sense to me on a personal level, as the entire concept of religion itself is a social construct that is constructed by humans. Also, I do not believe human beings process free will, as there is nothing in the universe that gives us as a species said free will, so I would be a deterministic materialist in this regard. I also reject religion as a concept that as any basis in reality entirely because of the fact that it is anti-individualist in its nature, and due to the fact that I've never had a single good experience with religious organizations or people related to them, having had better experiences with secular crowds.

[[File:Absurd.png]] Absurdism [[File:Absurd.png]]
While life doesn't have any objective meaning, I'm opposed to both nihilism and pessimism, as neither of those are good outlooks on life. Even if things like optimism come with their own issues as well, to which I'm opposed to as well. I view the meaning of life that of what you make it.

[[File:Antinil.png]] Anti-Nihilism [[File:Antinil.png]]
Just because life is pointless doesn't mean the future is pointless, nor is their no purpose in living. However, while I do believe that objective morality exists that can be applied to all humans, which that morality being human happiness, as previously stated, I also oppose moral absolutism. Believing that moral absolutism is a short sided way of looking at the world and history at large.

[[File:Pragmat.png]] Pragmaticism [[File:Pragmat.png]]
I am a political realist, the best way to make change is through a pragmatic approach. So, I am opposed to both romanticism and idealism. As, while idealism is to an extent, necessary, you have to do things that go against your own ideas to inspire change. Even if it means compromising on your own ideals, it's better to have some of the change you wanted, compare to having nothing at all. And as such, harm reduction is very much necessary to achieve change.

[[File:Cosmo.png]] Cosmopolitanism [[File:Cosmo.png]]
I view myself as a citizen of the world, and I get a lot of my international theory from cosmopolitanism, as I believe the world should be internationally united. Despite being a patriot who loves my country. I would argue that being a nationalist and a cosmopolitan are not contradictory views to hold, as you can still like your country, but want international co-operation and mutual respect for each others differences when other people are willing to mutually respect you as well. However, while I do support globalization, and see it as the best way to reduce economic equality for all countries, I do not support economic globalization, as it only benefits large companies. Along with rejecting Multiculturalism, as it has shown to never work in any country it has been practiced in.

[[File:Constructivist.png]] Social Constructivism [[File:Constructivist.png]]
Being a social constructivist, I believe societal factors and the upbringing of individuals are important in determining the behavior of said individuals. And, should be used when observing the behavior and nature of society at large.

[[File:Indiv.png]] Individualism [[File:Indiv.png]]
I am an individualist, I believe that individualism is important for society, and that individuals should be free to desire their own passions and hobbies, free from any sort of higher authority. Whether it be clerical authority, governmental authority, or community authority, the individual worth triumphs over all of that. With this, I support the expansion and preservation of civil liberties, like Freedom of Speech, as those civil liberties are important for any free society to thrive under. Some would argue that individualism and economic leftism are incompatible with each other, but I would argue that having the state provide you with everything would allow people to pursue their own interests and hobbies without the fear of poverty or unemployment and ect. So, individualism is more compatible with economic leftism than it is with economic rightism, in my opinion. This is also were my progressivism comes from, as ideologies like conservatism are very anti-individualist, conservatives believe they can tell you what you can do with your body, who you can marry, ect. With leftists having a more "live and let live" attitude, I will side with them, as they don't feel the need to boss me around and are the least opposed to me living my lifestyle as to how I want to.

However, with all of this in mind, one might ask why I'm not a libertarian (in a civic sense) who is opposed to governmental authority playing a role in the daily lives of citizens. This would mostly be because, I believe that for the trade off of individual liberty of people and for individual rights to be upheld, the government has to be there to protect said individual liberty whenever threats to individual liberty arise.

[[File:Humanismpix.png]] Humanism [[File:Humanismpix.png]]
My humanist ways of thinking can largely come from utilitarianism. That being, all people on this planet come from the same place, and are entitled to be treated with the same dignity and standards.

[[File:Metamodernism.png]] Meta-Modernism [[File:Metamodernism.png]]
Modernism and Post-Modernism both make good points, but I can't fully subscribe to either of them. And, as such, I subscribe to the idea of Meta-Modernism.

[[File:Pop.png]] Populism [[File:Pop.png]]
Populism is a good way to achieve political power and to unite the world using pan-nationalist movements. So, I would incorporate populist heretic for both political praxis and international praxis. However, the creator of the page personally disagrees with populism to a certain extent, and many populist leaders in history have failed to deliever on their promises and actually just ended up serving the elite themselves, he views it as a good way to achieve his objectives.

Main Influences
Epicurus (341BC-270BC) Franklin D. Roosevelt (1882-1945) Theodore Roosevelt (1858-1919) Al Gore (1948) John Locke (1632-1704) Albert Einstein (1879-1955) Mikhail Gorbachev (1931) Barack Obama (1961) Edward Snowden (1983) Julian Assange (1971) Huey Long (1893-1935) Alexei Navalny (1976) Olof Palme (1927-1986) Sviatlana Tsikhanouskaya (1982) Roman Albertovich Abalin (1998) Joseph Stiglitz (1943) George Orwell (1903-1950) Martin Luther King Jr. (1929-1968) John Stuart Mill (1806-1873) Joseph Lancaster (?) John Maynard Keynes (1883-1946) Greg Guevara (1997) Bernie Sanders (1941) Ian Kochinski (1994) Petter Vallentyne (1952) Jeremy Corbyn (1949) Elizabeth Warren (1949) Hillel Steiner (1942) Rick Falkvinge (1972) June Nicole Lapine (1991) Joshua Wong (1996) Agnes Chow (1996) Nathan Law (1993)

Personality + Stylistic Notes
He loves playing Hoi4 and other paradox related strategy games, as his steam libraries most played games consist of paradox games, and other related strategy games not related to paradox. He also loves hanging out with his buds on discord to talk about random shit like playing Minecraft or random video games together.

He hates all kinds of extremism, seeing them as destructive for humanity, and gets uncomfortable when he's around them. Especially around fascists, as they are his anti-thesis and will often call them retarded larpers who just discovered politics from playing hoi4. And, despises both on the cultural left who take it too far as much as those on the cultural right, but he wouldn't be a horseshoe centrist in this regard, even if he hates intersectional idpol leftists as much as he hates white supremacist idpol rightists.

Outside of political discussion spheres, he's mostly calm and sometimes jokingly mean to people. But, almost never fedposts because he finds it annoying, hateful without a punchline, and unfunny most of the time. He's pretty accepting of what other people do with this mindset, as he is in no authority to tell others what to do, and wants people to have the same mutual respect for that. Although, like said previously, due to certain political ideologies that he holds massive distain for, he can be standoffish at times and even rude, but that's just due to the elitism and rudeness seen and embodied within the people who adopt such hateful ideologies themselves, which should be of no surprise.

He has also been accused of liking femboys after making a couple of jokes about them which he will not be left alone about, and constantly persists that he is a heterosexual male that likes women.

He is a very patriotic American and likes having sex and other things that make him happy, and gets very upset very quickly whenever people try to judge him on his habits and personal passions, but usually doesn't care or feel any guilt and will still pursue them.

You can often find him simping left-democrats like Bernie Sanders and complaining about the establishment. But, will still probably vote for the establishment anyways because there's no other choices, leading to people calling him a shitlib or a radlib.

History
It all started back in the summer of 2016, when he was browsing youtube and got recommend a video titled "Alternate future of the world" by a channel called Romanian Mapping, which featured aforementioned balls. This peaked his interest and quickly became one of his favorite interests, which served his my entry to the polandball fandom. Around in summer 2017 he got recommended a video by a content creator named "ISorrowProductions", which served as his entry to strategy games and Hearts of Iron 4, to which I bought back in November of 2017, and would revitalize my interest in the polandball fandom as those two are deeply connected (obviously).

He stopped watching mapping content back in early 2018 because the content was getting pretty stale, but I still liked Country balls and its fandom, but because of this sudden loss of interest in mapping content, he became less active in watching Polandball related content (although I still liked creators like ISP and Alex The Rambler). Around 2020, I got recommended a video called "The political compass rap" by a content creator known as "Jreg" (which many of you here most definitely know) by a friend in this private discord server that I no longer associate with, due the friend in question having been accused of doing so really bad things (nothing illegal, just being a general douche to others I associated with).

After I got recommended this video by my friend, this was the moment I got introduced into politics into any real capacity that actually interested me (although I never liked r/politicalcompassmemes because I saw it as a really politically illiterate subreddit). This same video and memes related to the political compass would serve as my entry into the polcompball fandom, I would quietly lurk around the subreddit back in early 2021. He created his new reddit account back in 2021 and started using it mid summer, however, he never used his old 2017 reddit account due to him post a lot of admittedly cringe stuff he never wants anyone to see.

He himself hasn't been active in any sort of discord related servers in this community due to him having lost most of his interest in discord after the events that happened, but he has been active in a couple offshoot communities related to political tests. However, he still lurks on discord with his friends which is how he is still in contact with them, but none of which are related to this community, but just politics and gaming in general. It was in similarly politically related servers that he had gotten into a lot of heated arguments with far-right groups and conservatives that caused him double down on his own progressive ideals. But, outside of these incidents, he has remained mostly drama free outside of political communities. And, has even befriended one of his old friends he used to talk to from 2019. So, he's sure of his own political positions and will not change them any time soon.

[[File:Apolit.png]] Completely politically illiterate Period [[File:Kak.png]] (2003 - 2012)
I knew nothing about politics at this time because I was a child. None of us start political.

[[File:Apolit.png]] Politically illiterate social liberalism period [[File:Soclib.png]] (2012 - 2016)
It was some time back in 2012 were I even gained a shred of political consciousness, which was somewhat influenced by my parents because I had nothing to base my political views off of due to having no knowledge of politics. Although I remember saying that I would've voted for Barrack Obama during that time because of how I was influenced by my dad. Around 2016, I got recommended an "SJW owned compilation", and for many people, this is were their political journey began. For me, it didn't influence my opinion on the political landscape as he had next to no idea what it even was, although it did leave him with a couple of "anti-sjw" sentiments that would contradict some of his more economically left-wing and socially left-wing views.

[[File:Apolit.png]] Politically illiterate social democrat period [[File:Socdem.png]] (2016 - 2020)
It was also during the 2016 presidential election I found myself hating Donald Trump and a lot of his rhetoric. Although, I remember discovering other politicians and what their platforms had to say because I also hated Hillary Clinton and saw both Trump and Hillary as equally bad. However, due to his illiteracy of politics at the time, he had no real political positions on the 2016 election outside hating both the primary candidates.

It was when I got recommended a bunch of politically related videos from youtubers that my real political opinions would start to form. Some of these would be from Sh0eOnHead and other creators. He adopted some more "anti-woke" positions being espoused by these creators like being an "anti-feminist" while still supporting abortion rights and being against Trump. He also got recommended videos from the skeptic community but religion never interested him in any sort of way so he never watched them, but he did adopt more anti-clerical leanings in in the later months 2018 due to his hatred of organized religion and its hypocrisy, and would constantly dunk on religious conservatives and watch Youtube content that would relate to such topics. So, the closest thing he was during this time was an anti-clerical, anti-sjw, pro-choice, anti-trump, and anti-conservative social democrat. Once again, his beliefs were all over the place due to him not having the best grasp of politics. His "anti-woke" stances weren't even him being socially conservative, just being ultimately misinformed by creators he previously got recommended, and would drop these views later down the line as he was not socially conservative, and disagreed with practically everything social conservatism advocated for.

[[File:Progress.png]] Taking the Breadpill [[File:Socdem.png]] (2020 - 2021)
I began to solidate my political positions better after the youtube climate change, to which, a lot of these youtubers dropped their whole "anti-sjw" attitudes, which made me realize how dumb and contradictory it was to hold these views with my other views. It was around this time I was very certain of my own political beliefs and what I would describe myself as when in the 2020 election when I endorsed Bernie Sanders as a democratic candidate and self identified as a progressive social democrat. It was also around this time I realized that there was no real difference between democrats and republicans. And, began to throw away my old "anti-sjw" leanings when I began hanging out with more progressive crowds who opened my mind to which is what I greatly needed going into politics.

[[File:Anti-Patriotism.png]] Anti-Nationalist Phase [[File:AntiNation.png]] (2021 - 2022)
He grew a hatred of nationalism towards later 2021 due to him hating his own state government, and not his actual country. He would label himself as an "anti-nationalist" and started to take an extremely cosmopolitan view on things along with being against populism. He even endorsed multiculturalism after diving into more progressive talking points and started buying into left-wing idpol. But, he was always conflicted on these views, and got convinced that this view was too far to hold after he started growing a love for the west after the recent events that took place during the beginning of 2022. He unironically endorsed economic globalism for a short time with this, but he quickly came to realize how bad and contradictory that was towards his own beliefs, but still for some reason supported the European Union due his political influence from western Europe countries. But, adopted more populist influences over time which would lead him to stop having a pro-European attitude, and would shift it towards euroscepticism. He also stopped supporting multiculturalism, seeing it as a scam, and adopted more assimilationist attitudes. It's funny, because he went from the so-called "anti-sjw" to being what he despised back in his earlier, more confused, days of politics.

[[File:Globnat.png]] Solidating my political beliefs [[File:Natprog.png]] (2022+)
It was around the state of mid 2022 that he would get more consistent with his views after some talks on discord with some people. He adopted interculturalism, patriotism, and became skeptical of land speculation all together. Which, caused him to adopt Georgism as his policy for landlords and housing, seeing property holders as the core issue of the United States housing crisis. So, he got out of identity politics, became more nationalist, still maintains his cosmopolitan views with not being contradictory towards his own political beliefs and party, and is still progressive on social matters. This is were he stands today, a progressive social democratic georgist.

My Political Journey
> --->  >  >

Dad
Social Liberalism
 * [[File:Progress.png]] Progressivism
 * [[File:Socdem.png]] Social Democracy
 * [[File:Civlibert.png]] Civil Libertarianism
 * [[File:Humanismpix.png]] Humanism

Mom
Liberal Conservatism
 * [[File:Fiscon.png]] Fiscal Conservatism
 * [[File:Protect.png]] Protectionism
 * [[File:Modnat.png]] Patriotism

Sister
Social Libertarianism
 * [[File:Progress.png]] Progressivism
 * [[File:Bhl.png]] Bleeding-Heart Libertarianism
 * [[File:Raddem.png]] Radical Democracy

Granddad
Libertarian Conservatism
 * [[File:Xbert.png]] Christian Libertarianism
 * [[File:Honk.png]] Satirism

Grandma
Apoliticism
 * [[File:Moder.png]] Moderatism

Closeted Discord Friend
Satirism
 * [[File:Liberty.png]] Free Speech Absolutism
 * [[File:Blacknat.png]] Black Nationalism
 * [[File:Soccap.png]] Social Capitalism
 * [[File:Modprog.png]] Moderate Progressivism

Alexander
Liberalism
 * [[File:3way.png]] Third Way
 * [[File:Antifa.png]] Anti-Fascism
 * [[File:Glib.png]] Green Liberalism

Nouh
Democratic Socialism
 * [[File:Libsoc.png]] Libertarian Socialism
 * [[File:Leftpop-0.png]] Left-Wing Populism
 * [[File:Ecosoc.png]] Eco-Socialism
 * [[File:Nordmodel.png]] Nordic Model

Mark
Moderatism
 * [[File:Neoliberal-icon.png]] Neoliberalism
 * [[File:Radcent.png]] Radical Centrism
 * [[File:European_Federalism.png]] European Federalism

Political Compass Test


Economic Leftism / Economic Rightism (x): -2.00 Social Authoritarian / Social Libertarian (y): -6.67

Test Result: Libertarian Unity

SapplyValues


Equality / Markets (x): -2 Security / Freedom (y): -1.67 Progress/ Tradition (z): 7.50

Test Result: Center-Left

SHODANSapplyValues


Equality / Markets (x): -1 Security / Freedom (y): -1.7 Progress/ Tradition (z): 11.5

Test Result: Center-Left

8Values
Equality 66.0% / 33.0% Markets (Social)

Nationalism 23.3% / 76.7% Globalism (Internationalist)

Liberty 71.5% / 28.5% Authority (Liberal)

Tradition 17.6% / 82.4% Progress (Very Progressive)

Ideology: Social Democracy

NewValues
Equality 62.6% / 37.4% Markets (Social)

Nationalism 27.4% / 72.6% Globalism (Globalist)

Liberty 57.1% / 42.9% Authority (Moderate)

Tradition 22.9% / 77.1% Progress (Very Progressive)

Ideology: Social Democracy

Statecraft Compass
Democracy 75.0% / 25.0% Autocracy

Liberty 66.0% / 34.0% Security

Equality 74.0% / 26.0% Competition

87.0% Progress / 13.0% Tradition

Closest Ideology: Leftism

Furthest Ideology: Fascism

9Axes
Federalism 60% / 40% Unitarism (Moderate Federal)

Democracy 70% / 30% Authority (Democratic)

Globalism 75% / 25% Isolationism (Globalist)

Militarism 25% / 75% Pacifism (Pacifist)

Assimilationist 35% / 65% Multiculturalist (Moderate Multiculturalist)

Security 35% / 65% Liberty (Moderate Freedom)

Equality 64% / 36% Markets (Moderate Equality)

Secular 80% / 20% Religious (Extreme Secular)

Progress 78% / 22% Tradition (Progressive)

Ideology: Social Democracy

12Axes
Federalism 61.0% / 39.0% Unitarism (Federal)

Democracy 71.5% / 29.5% Authority (Representative Democracy)

Security 36.0% / 64.0% Liberty (Liberal)

Internationalism 76.0% / 24.0% Nationalism (Internationalism)

Militarism 25.0% / 75.0% Pacifism (Non-Aggressive)

Assimilationism 35.0% / 65.0% Multiculturalist (Polyculturalist)

Collectivize 50.0% / 50.0% Privatize (Mixed Economy)

Planned 70.0% / 30.0% Laissez-Faire (Regulationism)

Protectionism 41.5% / 58.5% Globalism (Moderate)

Irreligious 82.0% / 18.0% Religious (Atheist)

Progress 75.0% / 25.0% Tradition (Progressive)

Technology 75.0% / 25.0% Bio-conservative (Technological)

Ideology: Social Liberalism

AmericanValues
Conservatism 20.2% / 79.8% Liberalism (Very Liberal)

Cooperation 68.0% / 32.0% Individualism (Collectivist)

Globalism 67.1% / 32.9% Isolationism (Globalist)

Freedom 55.6% / 44.4% Security (Moderate)

Doctrinial 63.8% / 36.2% Textual (Doctrinal)

Centralism 50.0% / 50.0% State's Rights (Balanced)

Ideology: Progressive Democrat

LeftValues
Revolution 5.9% / 94.1% Reform (Extremely Reformist)

Scientific 35.9% / 64.1% Utopian (Utopian)

Central 46.7% / 53.3% Decentral (Neutral)

International 75.0% / 25.0% National (Internationalist)

Party 92.3% / 7.7% Union (Extremely Partisan)

Production 38.9% / 61.1% Ecology (Ecological)

Conservative 26.5% / 73.5% Progressive (Progressive)

Ideology: Social Democracy

CapValues
Free Market 41.7% / 58.3% Corporatism (Regulationism)

Futurism 70.8% / 29.2% Conservatism (Progressivism)

Autocracy 36.5% / 63.5% Democracy (Representativism)

Authoritarian 44.4% / 55.6% Libertarian (Libertarianism)

Environment 61.1% / 38.9% Productivism (Sustainability)

Land Rights 40.0% / 60.0% Georgism (Land Value Tax)

Anti-Clerical 80.3% / 19.7% Religious (Atheism)

Globalism 70.8% / 29.2% Nationalism (Internationalism)

Interventionism 40.0% / 60.0% Isolationism (Non-Interventionist)

Accerlation 66.7% / 33.3% Deceleration (Research)

Elitism 29.2% / 70.8% Populism (Popular)

Disunity 75.0% / 25.0% Unity (Enemies)

Ideology: Social Meritocracy

LiberationValues
Moderate 70.9% / 29.1% Radical (Labourism)

Left-Unity 51.9% / 48.1% Lib-Unity (Generalist)

Centralized 50.0% / 50.0% Decentralized (Balanced)

Localist 31.5% / 68.5% Globalist (Internationalist)

Traditionalist 23.7% / 76.3% Progressive (Very Progressive)

Reform 83.3% / 16.7% Revolution (Reformism)

Markets 68.8% / 31.2% Planning (Slightly Unregulated)

Ideology: Social Democracy

EconValues
Equity 62.5% / Competition 37.5% (Redistributed)

Horizontal 60.9% / Hierarchy 39.1% (Levelled)

Demand 60.9% / Regulation 39.1% (Permissive)

Centralized 50.0% / Local 50.0% (Neutral)

Automation 56.3% / Employment 43.7% (Industrialized)

Commons 73.4% / Rent 26.6% (Anti-Rent)

Birth Right 22.9% / Merit 78.1% (Opportunity)

Unionized 75.0% / Divided 25.0% (Pro-Union)

Closest Match: Social Democracy

AuthValues
Oligarchy 95.5% / Autocracy 4.5%  (Bureaucracy)

Capitalist 42.9% / Socialist 57.1% (Mixed Economy)

Elitism 10.0% / Populism 90.0% (Populism)

Prevention 35.7% / Deterrence 64.3% (Discouragement)

Diverse 87.5% / Uniform 12.5% (Polyculturalist)

Irreligion 62.5% / Theocracy 37.5% (Anti-Clericalism)

Best Suited 75.0% / Hereditary 25.0% (Meritocracy)

Auth Disunity 83.3% / 16.7% Auth-Unity (Disunity)

Closest Match: Paternalistic Conservatism

Right Values
Reform 97.2% / 3.8% Conserve (Progressive)

Intervention 65.0% / 35.0% Laisse-Faire (Regulationist)

Authority 35.0% / 65.0% Constitution (Democratic)

Particular 62.5% / 37.5% Universal (Non-Aggressive)

Theocratic 0.0% / 100.0% Separation (Secularism)

Accelerate 70.0% / 30.0% Decelerate (Productivism)

Assimilation 42.5% / 57.5% Multicultural (Neutral)

Ideology: Geolibertarianism

ConservaValues
Moderate 97.1% / 2.9% Radical (Center-Conservative)

Socialist 51.9% / 48.1% Capitalist (Centrist)

Authoritarian 50.4% / 49.6% Libertarian (Balanced)

Nationalist 29.2% / 70.8% Globalist (Diplomatic)

Conventionalist 87.3% / 12.7% Conspiratorialist (Conventionalist)

Ideology: Third Way

8Dreams
Altruity 57.5% / 42.5% Avarice (Realist)

Dominant 33.0% / 67.0% Insular (Ideological Pacificist)

Self 72.8% / 27.2% Totality (Individualist)

Stalwart 10.7% / 89.3% Hedonic (Hedonist)

Ideology: Social Kakistocracy

DozenValues
Equality 55.6% / 44.4% Property (Collective)

Coordination 63.2% / 37.8% Commerce (Regulated)

Dominion 42.4% / 57.6% Anarchy (Dispersed)

Permisison 80.6% / 19.4% Restriction (Tolerant)

Inclusivity 70.8% / 29.2% Supremacy (Respectful)

Heritage 24.3% / 75.7% Novelty (Progressive)

Ideology:

Next Matches: Social Democracy,  Techno-Populism

Worst Matches: Esoteric Fascism,  Jihadism,  Clerical Fascism

Top 10 Closest Matches: Top 10 Furthest Matches:
 * 1) [[File:Paleoliberal.png]]  - 100.00%
 * 2) [[File:Socdem.png]] Social Democracy - 98.02%
 * 3) [[File:E-Democracy.png]] Techno-Populism - 97.96%
 * 4) [[File:Libleft.png]] Left Libertarianism - 96.70%
 * 5) [[File:Nordmodel.png]] Nordic Model - 95.98%
 * 6) [[File:Socgeo.png]] Social Georgism - 95.72%
 * 7) [[File:NatProg.png]] Bull Moose Progressivism - 95.60%
 * 8) [[File:Socliber.png]] Social Libertarianism - 95.47%
 * 9) [[File:Radlib.png]] Radical Liberalism - 95.41%
 * 10) [[File:Soclib.png]] Social Liberalism - 94.22%
 * 1) [[File:Esofash.png]] Esoteric Fascism - 0.00%
 * 2) [[File:Jihad.png]] Jihadism - 0.00%
 * 3) [[File:Cfash.png]] Clerical Fascism - 0.00%
 * 4) [[File:Polpot.png]] Pol Potism 0.01%
 * 5) [[File:Nazcap-Hat.png]] National Capitalism - 0.06%
 * 6) [[File:Odal.png]] Odalism - 0.11%
 * 7) [[File:Reactlib-icon.png]] Reactionary Libertarianism - 0.17%
 * 8) [[File:Hoppef.png]] Hoppeanism - 0.18%
 * 9) [[File:Moncap.png]] Monarcho-Capitalism - 0.24%
 * 10) [[File:Nazi.png]] National Socialism - 0.27%

6Foundations
Care - [23/30] 76.7%

Fairness - [23/30] 76.7%

Loyalty - [9/30] 30.0%

Authority - [16/30] 53.3%

Sanctity - [12/30] 30.0%

Liberty - [18/30] 60.0%

Estimated Ideology: Social Democracy

PolcompballValues
Sincerity 65.0% / Irony 35.0% (Rational)

Jannyphobe 61.4% / Jannyphile 38.6% (Populist)

Veteran 35.4% / Newbie 64.6% (Apprentice)

Wholesome 71.4% / Edgy 28.6% (Goodwilling)

Horny 87.5% / Anti Horny 13.5% (Decadent)

Active 34.5% / Lurker 65.5% (Sometimes)

Standard 50.0% / Wacky 50.0% (Political)

Boring 33.3% / Schizo 66.7% (Neurotic)

Liked 66.1% / Disliked 33.9% (Appreciated)

Discriminatory 23.4% / Inclusive 76.6% (Accepting)

Behaving 55.8% / Misbehaving 44.2% (Behaved)

DiscriminatoryValues
White 42.5% / Black 57.5% (Racial Egalitarianism)

Matriarchy 55.0% / Patriarchy 45.0% (Feminism)

Jeunism 35.0% / Adultism 65.0% (Moderate Adultism)

Hetero 41.3% / Homo 58.7% (Sexual Orientation Equality)

Cis 41.3% / Trans 58.7% (Transgender Equality)

Malthusocracy 60.0% / Lipostrocracy 40.0% (Body Type Equality)

CulturalValues Test
Monoethnic 13.1% / 86.9% Multiethnic (Ethnic Abolitionist)

Monocultural 31.7% / 68.3% Multicultural (Slightly Multicultural)

Favoritism 4.6% / 95.4% Equality (Absolute Equality)

Tolerance 79.8% / 20.2% Separation (Tolerant)

Pro-LGBT 78.7 / 21.3 Anti-LGBT (Pro-LGBT)

Nation 34.5% / 65.5 International (Continental)

Religion 0.0% / 100.0% Secular (French Secularism)

Essentialism 1.1% / 98.9% Constructivism (Extremely Constructivist)

Closest Match: Post-Modernism

Vanguard Values
Demagogue 87.5% / 12.5% Technocrat (Party)

Planned 28.1% / 84.4% Market (Market)

One Country 25.0% / 75.0% Global (International)

Military 9.4% / 90.6% Peace (Peace)

Proletarian 71.9% / 28.1% Peasant (Proletarian)

Uniform 37.5% / 62.5% Tolerant (Mixed)

Traditional 15.6% / 84.4% Neoteric (Progressive)

Populist 96.9% / 4.1% Elitist (Everyman)

Closest Match: Democratic Socialism

Religious Values
Pro-Catholic 12.4% / 87.6 Anti-Catholic (Extremely Anti-Catholic)

Pro-Protestant 29.9% / 70.1% Anti-Protestant (Anti-Protestant)

Pro-Orthodox 26.4% / 73.6% Anti-Orthodox (Anti-Orthodox)

Philo-Semitic 46.3% / 53.7% Anti-Semitic (Neutral)

Islamophilic 29.2% / 70.8% Islamophobic (Islamophobic)

Pro-Buddhist 25.9% / 74.1% Anti-Buddhist (Anti-Buddhist)

Pro-Hindu 25.7% / 74.3% Anti-Hindu (Anti-Hindu)

Pro-Pagan 23.7% / 76.3% Anti-Pagan (Anti-Pagan)

Satanic 46.0% / 54.0% Divine (Neutral)

Religious 8.5% / 91.5% Atheistic (Fanatically Atheistic)

Closest Match: Secular Atheist

Dichotomy Philosophy
Materialism 75.0% / 25.0% Spiritualism

Egoism 66.7% / 33.3% Altruism

Idealism 32.0% / 68.0% Pragmatism

Hedonism 76.8% / 24.2% Asceticism

Nihilism 44.2% / 55.8% Moralism

Rationalism 72.4% / 27.6% Romanticism

Skepticism 97.9% / 2.1% Absolutism

Closeted Match:,  Objectivism,

AltValues
Individual 62.5% / 37.5% Collective (Individual)

Market 66.7% / 33.3% Planned (Regulated)

Essentialism 0.0% / 100.0% Constructivism Constructivist

Pragmatic 79.2% / 21.8% Idealist (Utilitarian)

Universal 84.4% / 16.6% Particular (Universal)

Ecological 37.5% / 62.5% Industrial (Balanced)

Politicized 54.2% / 45.8% Apolitical (Balanced)

Religious 18.8% / 81.2% Secular (Atheist)

Futuristic 66.7% / 33.3% Historical (Futuristic)

IdeoShapes
Civil Axis: Liberal

Economic Axis: Social

Societal Axis: Very Progressive

Diplomatic Axis:

Closest matching ideologies: Liberalism,   Social Democracy,  Left-Wing Populism,  Progressivism

Complementarily opposed: Neoconservatism,  Right-Wing Populism,  Conservatism

Furthest matches: Nazism,  Theocracy,  Anarcho-Capitalism

Religious Typology Quiz
Solidly Secular

Political Typology Quiz
Progressive Left

Dichotomy Political Philosophy
Overall Left 74.8% / 25.2% Overall Right

Naturalist 94.9% / 5.1% Transcendental

Deconstructive 70.9% / 29.1% Traditional

Equality 55.9% / 44.1% Hierarchy

Liberation 73.1% / 26.9% Control

Closeted Match: Critical Thinker,  Socialist

Dichotomy Economic Test
Protectionism 36.4% / 63.6% Free Trade

Inter-Dependence 61.0% / 39.0% Autarky

Libertarianism 50.0% / 50.0% Statism

Globalisation 50.9% / 49.1% Nationalisation

Commercial 68.1% / 31.9% Subsistence

Adhocracy 35.9% / 64.1% Bureaucracy

Flat Tax 28.3% / 71.7% Progressive Tax

CN Values
Equality 63% / 37% Market (Equality Bias)

Freedom 67% / 33% Authority (Freedom Bias)

Progress 80% / 20% Tradition (Progress)

Ecology 55% / 45% Production (Neutral)

Closeted Match: Social Democracy

Follow Ups: Industrial Party,  Feminism,  Complete Westernization,  Pirate Party

Sex Values
Masculine 0.0% / 100.0% Feminine (Feminine)

Hyper 78.1% / Hypo 21.9% (High)

Dominant 58.3% / 41.7% Submissive (Switch)

Deviant 31.3% / 68.7% Pure (Vanilla)

Affection 12.5% / 87.5% Hedonism (Hedonist)

Center For a Stateless Society
Economic Leftist 65.0% / 35.0% Economic Rightist

Social Liberal 89.0% / 11.0% Social Conservative

Civil Libertarian 83.0% / 17.0% Civil Authoritarian

Antistatist 52.0% / 48.0% Statist

Anti-Militarist 81.0% / 19.0% Militarist

The Political Sextant Quiz
Top Ideologies:

Civic Nationalism 100%

Kemalism 100%

Social Democracy 100%

Three Principles of the People 100%

Third Way 100%

Worst Ideologies:

Anarcho-Primitivism -50%

Classical Marxism -50%

De Leonism -50%

Mutualism -50%

Agorism -60%

Anarcha-Feminism -50%

Marxism-Leninism -67%

National Anarchism -50%

Synthesis Anarchism -50%

American Political Bloc Quiz
Progressive - 189

Green - 182

Mainstream Democrat - 156

Libertarian - 131

Acela Centrist - 120

Neoconservative - 90

Establishment Conservative - 68

Trumpist - 68

Political Personality Quiz
Utopian Virtuoso

Policy Priorities:


 * [[File:Prog.png]] Social Equality - 95%


 * [[File:Socdem.png]] Social Healthcare - 95%


 * [[File:Technocracy.png]] Education Reform - 90%


 * [[File:Envi.png]] Environmental Health - 85%


 * [[File:World.png]] Amicable Global Relations - 85%


 * [[File:Multicult.png]] Immigration Rights - 80%


 * [[File:Sec.png]] Law and Regulation - 60%


 * [[File:Cap.png]] Wealth Maximization - 25%


 * [[File:ChristNat.png]] Religious Fundamentals - 20%

Party Alignment:


 * [[File:Demcr.png]] Democratic Ticket - 95%


 * [[File:RepubUS.png]] Republican Ticket - 3%


 * [[File:Libertarian.png]] Libertarian Ticket - 13%


 * [[File:GreensUS.png]] Green Party Ticket - 33%

= My beliefs =

[[File:Dem.png]] Overview [[File:Dem.png]]
Mattism is a democratic ideology. Believing that, democracy has shown itself to be the least worst system, at least compared to all other forms tried. And, that countries without democracy are bound to fail compared to those with democratic institutions. Along with favoring reforms to our current system to make it more democratic and have an electorial system that is inclusive to more parties, and to fight corruption. He supports immigrant rights,  interculturalism,  secularism,  decentralization of power, ,  e-democracy,  semi-presidential system, and  the scaling back of the surveillance state.

[[File:Liberal_Democracy.png]] Liberal Democracy [[File:Liberal_Democracy.png]]
Mattism prefers a government that is built for the common good for the people, and thus, a a republic. Specifically, a liberal democracy. However, he wants to give the population more say in government, and thinks introducing policies that bring direct democracy into the government are a good idea. And, is supportive of a semi-direct democracy. Seeing it as the ultimate compromise between either a representative democracy, and a  direct democracy. So, Representatives should be largely responsible for governance, while citizens can have more autonomy through popular initiatives and referendums, ect.

[[File:Semiprez.png]] Semi-Presidential System [[File:Semiprez.png]]
Mattism takes issues with the current presidential system we currently have, believing that this system gives too much power to one person compared to a  parliamentary system. He would seek to combine elements from both of these governmental systems to create a semi-presidential system, were a  president and a  separate parliamentary system co-exist in the government.

[[File:Merit.png]] Civil Service Reform [[File:Merit.png]]
Mattism seeks to abolish the electoral college, seeing it as nothing more than an relic of the past that is barely functioning the modern day, and is disproportionately effecting third parties ability to compete, contributing to the two party dictatorship and the further elitism within these parties. With the ever increasing amount of people being disillusioned by our system, and not identifying with either democrats or republicans, he views this as a system that has to go. His first reform would to replace the electoral college vote with the popular vote. His other reforms would be to abolish the senate, seeing it as nothing more than upholding the elitism within the government, and preventing a lot of necessary reform. Along with a ban on corporate lobbying and gerrymandering. These reforms I would propose would, along with my other reforms, strengthen American democracy, prevent cronyism in our government, and give more people say in the government. As I believe our government shouldn't be for sale by massive corporations, it should be for the people, and make our overall system more meritocratic.

[[File:E-Democracy.png]] Electronic Voting [[File:E-Democracy.png]]
Mattism believes we need to push forwards technology that allow us to vote via things like, a phone, computer, ect. He is a supporter of an electronic democracy in this regard. However, realizing how vulnerable these methods are to outside influence, he opposes implementing these policies until we have the technology necessary to go through with it, but overall, he is supportive of the development of said technology. Voting via other methods will still be available and not be phased out. However, these policies would only be done on a local level, with things like national elections having to be done in-person or by mail.

[[File:Anti-Corrupt.png]] Whistle Blowers [[File:Anti-Corrupt.png]]
Mattism believes that people who expose government corruption shouldn't have to fear persecution, as the government and its institutions have a right to be inclusive and transparent with the population that is being governed. And, that any functioning democracy should work on ridding itself of corrupt officials in office.

[[File:Fed.png]] Federalism [[File:Fed.png]]
In terms of how the bureaucracy is administered, Mattism prefers local governance compared to a  unitary government, mainly due to how ineffective a unitary government would preform in the United States due to its size. Along with the fact that, federalism is inherently more democratic and less wasteful in terms of bureaucracy, the state's governments will know what their citizens know more than what the federal government will. But, states governments have to abide by the national laws, and the constitution. As, he is no hardcore "muh state's rights", and believes the government should be allowed to exercise control over local governments over certain issues, but still thinks most of the governance should be done at local levels.

[[File:DefDem.png]] Defensive Democracy [[File:DefDem.png]]
Mattism believes the government should actively protect its institutions from those who wish to do them harm, as we cannot give them the freedom to tear down our democracy. This would function like a defensive democracy. If your party actively poses a threat to democracy, it shouldn't be included in government. Believing that freedom of assembly and speech has its limits, and where they use their voices to silence the voices of other people is enough to warrant this.

[[File:Intercult.png]] Interculturalism [[File:Intercult.png]]
Mattism used to support the idea of a multicultural society, believing that all cultures could live in harmony with each other. But, upon further research and discord conservations with some people, this way of thinking was idealistic for many reasons. Mainly being: the toleration of cultures that go against western and progressive ideals just for the sake of diversity, causing the rise of the radical right as seen during the European migrant crisis of 2015, and the pushing of pointless identity politics onto people which only entrenches mindless tribalism. So, with how immigrants will be handled, he supports Interculturalism. As, he opposes how multicultural societies tend to self-segregate, and how  ethnic centric societies are very bigoted towards outsiders. So, it allows for diversity at the local level, while still allowing for a shared sense of national identity.

However, from a cosmopolitan point of view, he's not concerned with protecting our cultural heritage from immigrants as much as he just wants to prevent infighting between different cultural groups, which is why he supports   in terms of assimilation, believing that they only have to adopt the language and national identity, and shouldn't be pressured into giving up their past cultures. As, we can all have our differences, said society should focus on what unifies them together instead of what emphasises their differences to challenge the self-segregation nature of cultures, this will make people more tolerant of each others cultures than outright stressing the differences between said cultures, which just leads to segregation. He opposes monoculturalism, as societies that stress one unified culture are too exclusionary to foreigners even when said foreigners could provide a massive benefit for the country. So, both multiculturalism and  monoculturalism are scams, society should be welcoming of foreigners, but those foreigners should have to learn our values and stress the similarities of other cultures to form a melting pot, were said cultures contribute to the national identity.

However, he supports the protection of native cultures and focusing on improving their quality of life in indigenous reserves, believing that they have been trampled on enough.

[[File:Civnat.png]] Immigration [[File:Civnat.png]]
Mattism's stance on immigration largely depends on the context of the country. But, in the United States, he takes a pro-immigration stance, and is in favor of liberalizing immigration, as immigrants help contribute to the labor force that is slowly shrinking each decade as America's population continues to age, while the birth rate declines. So, it's better to use this wave of immigration to our benefit. With addition to this, he supports giving illegal immigrants a legal pathway to citizenship. However, there will be a wait list where the immigrants have to be assimilated values before they can access any of the government programs, such as the welfare state. He also thinks it helps contribute to maintaining the social democratic state, as seen in the  Nordic countries. However, with less racism. Along with it being less destructive to the progressive movement, as cultures that do not tolerate our values will not peacefully coexist with us or a progressive culture.

In terms of how refugees will be handled, while he does support raising the cap of refugees that are taken in, he also realizes that some of the refugees we take in come from cultures that are fundamentally backwards in their way of thinking and hold anti-progressive and anti-western views. So, from wartorn places like Syria, we should be prioritizing who is going to benefit our country most and tightly vet them, but, outside of that, they can come if they drop their backwards views and don't cause trouble for anyone else in society. And, is against racism or  xenophobia that can be seen in many places like Europe after the immigrant crisis happened. He opposes the implementation of surveillance services and complete bans on immigration, as those are just purely motivated by the later, as not all of them coming into the country are terrorists who want to blow up stuff, but there is a very real issue with them coming from cultures that are fundamentally undemocratic.

[[File:Secular.png]] Secularism [[File:Secular.png]]
Mattism is against any religious organization playing a role in government, or the government subsidizing religious organizations through a tax exempt status. Which is why he seeks the complete separation of church and state, and differs from  Laicism as personal freedom is still respected and civil liberties relating to freedom of religion are upheld. He's opposed to forced secularism, or  religious governance. As well, he thinks that people who deny basic science based on their religious beliefs are very cringe, and only hold society back. And in this regard, he holds distrust of Islam, seeing as many third-world Islamic countries are riddled with  reactionaries  who use religion as a mean to further sentiment their rule. Not to say this doesn't apply to other religions, but, Islam in the modern day holds more relevancy. However, this is not to say he's against Islam or the people, he believes that they should be allowed to follow their beliefs. And is against the talking points of right-wing populists that excessively demonize the people, as many of them do nothing wrong as people. And, are most prominently racist and xenophobic talking points.

Although, he himself personally is completely opposed to any religious authority, and would be an anti-clericalist in this regard. Largely stimming from his individualist and populist stances, noting the nepotism and elitism seen within these organizations. And how, historically, religious organizations have used their influence to further their needs of the clergy men over the people while using said beliefs to justify the most heinous actions. He is vehemently opposed to them having any sort of political sway, and would favor their influence in the public sphere be minimized. And, while he does recognize the benefits of organized religion that has had on society through things like charities, those can be replaced through government programs anyways. So, organized religion is an overall net negative because it corrupts our politics and furthers the elitism within our political climate, which actively work against progressive agendas.

[[File:Civilib.png]] Civil Liberalism [[File:Civilib.png]]
Mattism is pro-privacy. Believing the expansion of the surveillance state in the United States hasn't been for the best interest of the people, but for the government to further its control over the general populace. He would enact reforms that weaken the surveillance state so it isn't so invasive into people's daily lives. This would include revoking the patriot act, and getting rid of other unneeded spying programs. As, he believes the government should be big enough to protect the people from harm and keep them safe, but also should respect the personal privacy of daily citizens lives. Because, he's not opposed to things like CCTV cameras in public places, as those can be useful for deterring things like  crime. But, the further expansion of these services to include wiretapping into people who aren't even greenlit for investigations and personal things like phone calls leads to the ever increasing authoritarianism in Western states, and is a severe breach of privacy.

[[File:Socdem.png]] Overview [[File:Socdem.png]]
On economics, Mattism takes inspiration from several ideologies, being: State Capitalism,  Market Socialism,  Social Corporatism,  Social Georgism, and  Keynesianism.

So, overall, he's your pretty average Social Democrat. And, despite being pretty left-wing in his economic beliefs, he is still skeptical of most forms of Socialism, believing that  Capitalism as ultimately shown itself to be the best economic system in most of its forms, with having the longest longevity compared to such economic systems. In spite of this, he believes that numerous regulations are necessary to keep this success, and to make the economy work for everyone. He wishes to create a Nordic style social democracy in the United States that focuses on  the ease of doing business,  wealth redistribution, and  the wellbeing of every citizen.

[[File:Keynes.png]] Fiscal Policy [[File:Keynes.png]]
In terms of macroeconomics, Mattism is self-described as a Keynesian, he believes that the government should actively take a hand in the market and create fiscal programs that increase spending to boost growth in the economy. Supporting increases of spending during times of crisis to dampen the damage done during said crisis, to recover the economy. The type of keynesian economic branch he subscribes to would be closest to that of new keynesianism.

[[File:Social_corpratism.png]] Mode of Production [[File:Social_corpratism.png]]
Mattism's mode of production would combines elements from Neo-corporatism,  Dirigisme, and the. He believes that the government should have its share in the market through state owned enterprises in sections of the economy that are naturally monopolistic, such as railways and electric grids. And, in sections of the private sector as well, which will compete with businesses within the market to guide the economy, which would be invested into through a sovereign wealth fund.

He advocates for class collaboration over  class struggle, seeing as classes do provide a benefit to society. And as such, the state should  to negotiate terms, with the state acting as a mediator between the two, seeing it as the best way to abolish class conflict.

[[File:SyndieSam.png]] Unions [[File:SyndieSam.png]]
Mattism supports trade unions and the right of workers to unionize, seeing the collapse of unions in the United States as disaster for both worker rights and the  progressive movement. So, in the labor market, there would be strong unionization of the working class, viewing unions as a favorable means to achieve working rights, along with it being necessary for the  progressive movement to keep political power. Trade unions and how they would be organized would be through. With state-owned unions and state-owned businesses making tripartite agreements even easier to ensure economic growth, he prefers there to be unionization of both the public sector and the private sector. However, he realizes that some public sector unions collide with the best interests of society, in that case, there would be some restrictions on those unions, but they have the right to unionize like any other job field.

He is also against union busting, believing that it is unconstitutional. Only being allowed when there is legitimate reason to do so, like when the union in question doesn't have the best interest of the workers they are representing. And, he thinks that companies that partake in such practice should be severely punished.

[[File:Cooperative Socialism.png]] Worker Co-operatives [[File:Cooperative Socialism.png]]
Mattism defends worker co-operatives, and believes that  worker co-ops as a business model have shown to be superior to other forms of traditional business models. And, is in favor of an economy which has its primary business model made up of worker co-ops. Medium to small-sized enterprises should be ran as worker co-operatives, although, this won't be enforced, as he realizes that an economy made up entirely up of this business model cannot sustain itself, and other forms of traditional business models will be allowed. This will be encouraged through things like tax breaks and subsidizes. Along with being a supporter of workplace democracy, as he believes that workers should be allowed to democratically control the workplace the workers work in. It will allow the workers to have more say in the production they produce, while not directly handing over the means of production to the workers. With the further democratization of the workplace and economic control given the workers via these means, this would ensure the increase of working wages and the creation of more jobs. The state would have control over some factors of production to distribute goods as for the  of production, but the market would be mostly responsible for controlling the allocation of the goods themselves.

[[File:Univhealth.png]] Healthcare [[File:Univhealth.png]]
Mattism is supportive of a, believing that it is detrimental to the nation to have people who cannot afford to pay for healthcare to be indebted just because they cannot pay. With the current healthcare system we have being more expensive with providing less coverage than it if it was just universal. He defends healthcare acts like Obamacare that expand healthcare coverage for people, but would prefer to transfer them into a universal healthcare system. Private healthcare options would still exist, as luxury for those who choose it, with the universal healthcare being the main option. However, preventable self-inflicted injuries such as drug abuse or being unvaccinated will not be covered, and that will directly come out of insurance or pocket.

[[File:Welf.png]] Welfare State [[File:Welf.png]]
Mattism believes that the state should play a  in one's life in terms of economics, to provide for the people, actively redistribute wealth, and promote equality of opportunity. With this, he is supportive of the expansion of the welfare state, and for the government to provide for goods and services to the people. He favors a universal welfare state as a way of redistribution of the wealth. Despite this, however, he isn't against private charities, and they will still exist. Given, they are certified to be a legitimate charity. As, he realizes the importance private charities play in both his life and the lives of many others, which would still be there. But, he prefers government solutions for redistributing income, seeing it as more effective.

[[File:Trustbust.png]] Monopoly Busting [[File:Trustbust.png]]
Mattism supports breaking up massive monopolies. As everyone knows, it is not good to have monopolies dominating an economy. In this case, he would support bringing back the strong anti-trust laws that were present during the progressive era of the United States. Along with this, the CEO's of said companies shouldn't be allowed to own any shares in the companies that are broken up. It's not good for any economy to have huge businesses dominating the market as it lowers the competitiveness and the ease of doing business in said economy, which is bad for economic output and growth of the economy.

[[File:Plutocrat.png]] Wealth [[File:Plutocrat.png]]
Mattism seeks the creation of high income and inherent taxes for wealthy families, along with wealth caps for CEO's, this will further weaken the influence of  elitist billionaires while redistributing wealth for our  social systems. However, he isn't opposed to billionaires existing, and realizes the benefits they have for our economy, but also realizes that they hold too much influence in our government and economy. So, if they are to exist, they should fairly contribute to the economy in taxes, respect environmental regulations, not offshore their wealth in other countries for tax avoidance, and not outsource our jobs to countries with lower wages. The wealthy people that do partake in these practices should be severely punished, and have all their assets nationalized by the government

[[File:Bankocracy.png]] Banking [[File:Bankocracy.png]]
Mattism believes in the creation of a strong central bank to regulate the supply of monetary units, as if the banking sector fails, then that brings our economy down too. This will ensure the economic stability of our economy. However, private banks will still be allowed to exist, given under extensive regulation. And, how the banks and credit unions would be ran would be dependent on the size of said bank.

[[File:Georgist.png]] Housing [[File:Georgist.png]]
On housing, Mattism views housing as a basic human right. And believes that this is were the market fails the most. He wishes to establish a land value tax to replace  property taxes. He supports. However, land value tax cannot be the only tax. As, the tax on its own wouldn't be enough to fund welfare programs. But, the reveune generated from this tax would contribute to the welfare state, making him a Social Georgist.

With zoning laws, he would relax single-family zoning to allow for the development of income housing, which is more mixed for home buyers with different types of income. As, the housing crisis that this country is facing is causing social instability. He doesn't believe it makes a whole lot of sense to regulate land use. The land value tax coupled with the liberalization of zoning laws would fight off land speculation and strengthen tenant unions.

[[File:Corp.png]] Corporate Welfare [[File:Corp.png]]
Corporate welfare can be accurately described as "socialism for the rich, capitalism for the poor", and should end. He is against bailing out firms that are deemed "too big to fail". If a business is "too big to fail", then it is too big to exist. Seeing it as contributing to crony capitalism, and favoritism within the economy. Were the wealth is being concentrated to the top one percent, with small businesses being left in the dust. He supports ending corporate welfare for big businesses. However, other forms of industry would still be subsidized, as he doesn't support ending corporate welfare entirely, just for those big businesses.

[[File:Regulationism.png]] Taxation [[File:Regulationism.png]]
Mattism favors high amounts of taxation to fund a universal welfare state, and the upkeep in social services for the population. And, these taxes will better help achieve equality of opportunity .The list of taxes that would be introduced would include:
 * [[File:Georgist.png]] Land value tax - This is to decommodify land ownership, the tax will be between 80 - 100%. As well, being a landlord can no longer be considered a full time job, but private ownership of land will still exist.
 * [[File:EconProg.png]] Wealth tax - The rich will be significantly taxed more through a progressive tax system. But, we cannot rely on just taxing the rich alone, as that isn't sustainable towards funding a welfare state. There will be various other methods used to get the most out of wealth redistribution.
 * [[File:Soccap.png]] Value added tax - A VAT tax will be used, as they've shown to be better at raising funds. And, with the added benefit that they are less easier to dodge.
 * [[File:Apolit.png]] Personal income tax - The personal income tax rate would be at 40%, this would be applied progressively as well, but that would be the median tax rate overall.
 * [[File:Envi.png]] Carbon tax - This tax would be to stop companies from polluting the environment with carbon emissions, it will be progressive.
 * [[File:DvCoordination.png]] Payroll tax - The payroll tax will be used to tax employ and employer income.
 * [[File:Religious.png]] Church tax - Churches will be taxed progressively based on their size. And, there will be more ways of taxing religious sites other than just directly taxing them.
 * [[File:Long.png]] Corporate tax - The ideal corporate tax rate would be 30 - 40%. Green technology companies would have a significantly lower corporate tax rate, as to encourage innovation.
 * [[File:Protect.png]] Import duties - This is to protect vital industry from foreign competitors. But, how high or low the duty is were it depends on where the goods come from. Like say, from a country we are on good terms with, there would be significantly lower import duties. But, countries that are used by companies for cheap labor or those that politically threaten us would have significantly higher import duties, to make those practices unprofitable, and protect the interest of American workers.
 * [[File:Krit.png]] Sin tax - Sin tax is needed to fund social programs. However, the former should be low as the tax is quite regressive and doesn't contribute a lot towards taxation. With only the most harmful goods (like drugs) being taxed at a significant rate, things like junk food and ect will be notably lower.

[[File:Social-ism.png]] Employment [[File:Social-ism.png]]
Mattism believes that employment should be handled through government programs that help the unemployed find employment in the labor market, through active labor market policies, such as  welfare to work. Ideally, the unemployment rate should be somewhere around 5 - 6%.

[[File:EconProg.png]] Minimum Wage [[File:EconProg.png]]
Mattism believes that Minimum Wage should be adjusted for yearly inflation, with wages being different for each job field you want to be employed in. The base line standard being a wage that allows you provide for yourself at the bare minimum, with states adjusting it to fit the needs of their population retrospectively.

[[File:Progress.png]] Overview [[File:Progress.png]]
Overall, Mattism is a socially progressive ideology that opposes. He believes that tradition stems from the past, and is not to be held sacred. And thus, favors a culture of permissiveness and tolerance, and is a  cultural progressive. He is supportive of gender equality, ,  drug decriminalization,  criminal justice reform,  cultural secularism, ect. His beliefs largely following that of Civil Libertarianism and. Where individual rights and liberty are respected when they pose little harm to others, and the harm principle is upheld. Believing that, as long as the individual is not harming anyone, then in most instances, they should be allowed to do as they please. He seeks to create a humanist state, based on  utilitarian ethics.

[[File:Prog-u.png]] Social Justice [[File:Prog-u.png]]
Mattism defends the concept of societal justice, seeking to create a cultural and social environment that is less strict and conformist and more open and inclusive to the socially disadvantaged. However, he is aware of the more SJW parts of this community, along with the  SJW parts of the conservative community as well. As, those groups focus on the supremacy of each others groups, like pointlessly inclusive idpol or  supremacist idpol. With this, his beliefs are largely aligned with the, and adopts a more moderate form of woke culture that still focuses on the issues of societal justice, but from a point of view that doesn't lean to much onto the more  revolutionary side of progressivism, like intersectionality. Not seeing all traditions or institutions as reactionary and bigoted, but also realizes the issues many of these institutions and traditions have themselves, and still seeks to reform them. So, while he is still relatively socially progressive, he is more moderate on these issues. And, realizes that some culture has to kept, as creating an inclusive culture just for the sake of inclusivity is pointless, and doesn't actually do anything for societal reform. He won't support anything that goes against conservatism just because it is progressive.

[[File:Gay.png]] LGBT Rights [[File:Gay.png]]
Mattism views the  with sympathy, seeing as they have been historically trampled over, and with no representation in the public sphere. With traditional views of morality further adding the  hostility towards their existence.

He is in favor of complete marriage equality between those of Heterosexuality and  Homosexual couples. Seeing the definition of marriage is between two loving souls, as it wrong to give people who had no control over what they were born with fewer rights.

Additionally, he is in favor of Trans rights, seeing gender dysphoria as a real thing that has been historically unaccounted for due to said views, that historically, has demonized these people. However, he does realize the dangers of putting children on things like hormone therapy, and wants to put restrictions on gender-affirming healthcare to prevent such dangers from happening, these restrictions would make it so that you have to be an adult to go through such. But, the surgeries and things associated with it will be provided for by healthcare givers, seeing it as a form of healthcare. He's pretty neutral towards, believing for it to hold some truth, but to be overgeneralizing the experiences of trans people as well. He doesn't think being transgender is a trend, as the amount of people coming out as trans can be explained by the nature of society which has become ever increasing of trans people, but also realizes that people do claim to be transgender for attention. So, he's more liberal on this issue, but not liberal to the point were he accepts everyone just for the sake of inclusiveness. As, that only devalues the experience of actual trans people who go through gender dysphoria. He also believes they should be allowed to legally change their gender on legal documents, as long as they go through surgery and the like to cure their dysphoria.

However, he personally dislikes pride culture, as he views it as only serving  massive corporations, and not the actual interests of the LGBT community themselves. Along with not liking identity politics, because he sees it as a form of tribalism that pointless divides people. However, he doesn't care how people express themselves, and things like pride parades and ect do not matter to him, nor will he put restrictions on pride month or anything related to LGBT organizations, as all of that is freedom of speech and expression that they have full right to exercise, even if I have disagreements with it. Even if he has his former disagreements with it. Although, he would prefer a society were both heteronormativity and the LGBT community as a political topic are de-emphasized, so one can be apart of the LGBT community and not have to hear about it in the news constantly. That would allow the LGBT community to live a normal life to those of their heterosexual peers without being judged or having to even think about it. But, that can only be achieved once LGBT equality has been achieved.

[[File:DvPermission.png]] Permissive Society [[File:DvPermission.png]]
Mattism defends a permissive society. And, believes that, as long as an individual's lifestyle doesn't violate the harm principle, then no government or community should be allowed to impose a specific lifestyle onto individuals. With this, he would decriminalize most victimless crimes, as there's no point in enforcing a law that cannot be enforced effectively. Along with it not making any sense to waste law enforcement resources on things that can be easily regulated to earn untapped money which could be used for things like government programs. As, societies that have increasingly liberal social views have higher rates of  egalitarianism in many fields, so it contributes to a more happier society overall.

[[File:Fem.png]] Feminism [[File:Fem.png]]
Mattism is a staunch supporter of feminism, and womens rights. And, he would self-describe himself as a male feminist, being sympathetic to the talking points of modern day feminism, while still holding some contempt for the modern day feminist movement. So, he's not against feminism, and even calls himself one, but thinks that some of their points could be adjusted. So, he supports,  , and. Feminism from that point onward is meh. And, before you accuse me of only being a misogynistic sex addicted pervert, that's legitimately not the case. As, I don't hate women and I do believe in feminist cases and want to actually fight for them.

He's against traditional gender roles, seeing them as a product of society, and not that of nature. Thinking it's best that women break free the constraints of them, as this would ultimately contribute to a society were women are more free to decide their own paths in life. Along with those roles being harmful towards men as well.

He is firmly in the pro-choice camp in terms of the abortion debate. Believing that, the choice ultimately lies with the women. And, as such, is for the liberalization of. Seeing as, a mother that bears a child she cannot financially support will strain our welfare services further, which will be detrimental to the welfare state. Along with seeing the label "pro-life" as inherently untruthful. As, many pro-lifers don't even care about the mothers health, or the welfare of the baby after they are born. And, even defend it in cases of rape or incest, which is just abhorrent in many ways. Along with not being supportive of welfare programs that help mothers, while supporting things like the  death penalty. And, while this isn't the case with all pro-lifers, as they come in many shapes and sizes, he still finds it awful that people defend forcing a mother to give birth all together, period. As, life doens't start at conception, and is just a bundle of cells. So, it isn't murder. As well, banning abortion doesn't end abortion, but only ends safe abortions. So, he supports the legalization of first, and second term abortions. With third-term abortions being regulated where the women's life is in danger, rape or incest, ect. He is also for the wide spread availability of contraception, as being pro-choice doesn't mean pro-abortion, he wants comprehensive sex education to reduce the amount of abortions. He prefers abortions to be safe, legal, and rare. With this, he sees the overturning of Roe v. Wade as a disaster that has wasted decades of civil rights progress, and hopes that abortion rights get reinstated in the future.

However, he is against affirmative action, seeing it as the employers decision to hire based on  merit, instead of things like gender, race, ect. Along with opposing radical feminists and  "men's rights advocates".

[[File:GRights.png]] Gun Rights [[File:GRights.png]]
Mattism believes that people should be allowed to own guns, given they have no criminal back round. But, with this, there should be numerous regulations in place to keep bad actors from easily attaining guns, which is what could be seen for the extensive gun violence problem this country faces. And, while not wanting to outright ban weapons that are deemed "for war", he wants extensive regulations on them, seeing as the majority of people will never own these types of fire arms, but still believing that people who want to own them and can actually afford them should be allowed to own them.

[[File:Scientocracy_Small.png]] Education [[File:Scientocracy_Small.png]]
Mattism believes our education system is in desperate need of reform. And, that education should be free from K-12, with college tuition being free as well, seeing tuition fees as stupid. With how things are taught, he is in favor of impartially, as things like History shouldn't be taught through a nationalistic lens. Along with teaching politics to our children to avoid the current gerontocracy our government is, but should be done in a neutral way that encourages students to pick their own beliefs. Public schools will be secular and based on  humanism. And, while he thinks it's good to teach students about injustices in society, he opposes the more radical concepts. like he said previously, such as intersectionality as a lens to teach such topics.

In terms of schools and how they are administered, he believes that there should be a mix of private and public schools, with private schools as luxury, but shouldn't be funded through things like vouchers. With the attention going to meeting the upkeep of public schools.

[[File:Autism.png]] Disability Rights [[File:Autism.png]]
Being on the spectrum himself, he's greatly sympathetic towards those with disabilities. Seeing as, their chance to live a meaningful life gets drastically reduced, along with the quality of living. With this, he would propose more funding towards social programs that help those in need, for things like schools, nursing homes, expanding accessibility in things like the job market, ect. As, while, he is obviously better off than a lot of people within this group, and is pretty capable of providing for himself, he still recognizes that there are many who less fortunate than him, and thinks its unfair for them to be at the bottom and vulnerable of society. However, he is against things like self-identification, and believes that people have to get medically diagnosed for mental disabilities to be apart of the mentally disabled community. As, self-identification only devalues the actual experiences of being mentally disabled (like the creator of this page) and makes it look like a complete joke. Along with this, it's also offensive to the creator of the page to be lumped into lower functioning autists, because while they as people obviously should get the help they need, to automatically be grouped with those people just undermines his own abilities and is dehumanizing.

[[File:Youth.png]] Youth Rights [[File:Youth.png]]
Mattism thinks its wrong to deny the rights of people based on their age, seeing the current system as too strict, and is supportive of youth rights. He believes that the voting age for local issues should be lowered to 16, with things like the presidency staying at 18. Along with more inclusion in things like the workplace, where there is a notable preference towards older people compared to younger people.

[[File:Equality.png]] Racial Egalitarianism [[File:Equality.png]]
Mattism views the notions of race or  ethnicity as something that is entirely irrelevant and only gets in the way of the world globalizing. And, ideally, both the concepts of race and ethnicity should be phased in and of itself, and shouldn't be a factor towards things like immigration. With this, he is a civic nationalist, seeing a country is defined by a common way of life, and to a certain extent, culture. So, he is favor of complete racial equality, seeing racial and ethnic inequality as determinantal to a country that should be actively fought. As, all men, regardless of their back round are created equal, and are entitled to the same rights with due respect for their differences. However, he's neutral towards movements like BLM, as they make good points that he does agree with, he also disavows the violence on both sides, which only furthers racial tensions (even if the former has been overall less egregious), and more radical concepts like  white guilt. Along with not liking the concepts of intersectionality and  identity politics, believing that attention should be drawn to the more socially disadvantaged in society, but also believing the former doesn't actually do a whole lot in addressing systemic reform. So, he also, to an extent, opposes things like critical race theory, due to their heavy reliance on said things, to which he dislikes.

[[File:Health and Safetyf.png]] Public Health and Safety [[File:Health and Safetyf.png]]
For health crisis's like drugs or obesity, Mattism doesn't think outright shaming the people themselves is a good idea, as it just leads to them being rejected by society without being able to integrate or easily get help. But, he also doesn't think these things should be idolized as well, the state should campaign against these through things like advertisements and the like, but the state should never step in directly to correct the behavior of individuals themselves. He realizes the need for a paternalistic government for things like disasters such as pandemics for harm reduction, but when there isn't a serious harm to public health posed by an individuals lifestyle that directly harms other people, then the government should mostly lay off the general population. Things like sin taxes should still exist, as some milder forms of harm reduction that don't outright intervene in the daily lives of citizens are needed for society.

[[File:Multicult.png]] Identity politics [[File:Multicult.png]]
Mattism doesn't support the idea of identity   from a progressive standpoint, as he realizes that things like  intersectionality and  idpol only further divide people needlessly which gets in the way of any  societal reform for socially disadvantaged people, and only submits tribalistic attitudes further. This whole culture war  itself is manufactured by massive  corporations that seek to divide people for their own gain, and both groups are retarded as one focuses on pointlessly inclusive intersectional idpol while the other focuses on supremacist idpol. People shouldn't be bound to an identity that they feel the need represents them. Everyone should be allowed to have their differences, but we should also realize what brings us closer together as well. He sees the rise of identity politics from both the left-wing and the  right-wing as destructive for American politics as a whole, as previously stated, it submits uselessly tribalistic and divisive attitudes that prevent real change from happening. With the left-wing focusing on pointless identity traits like "muh black lesbian trans people", and the right focusing on "muh white straight conservative christians". He also opposes both right-wing and left-wing political correctness, believing that it treats everyone like babies, but also opposes being politically incorrect just for the sake of it, he would take a middle approach to this.

[[File:FDF-Pirate.png]] Copyright & Internet Reform [[File:FDF-Pirate.png]]
Mattism has views how large companies are abusing their power to infinitely extend copyright so their intellectual property stops from going into public sphere as unacceptable. Along with how giant tech companies mass farm users internet data just to increase their already massive profit margins, which creates many issues in of itself, and just the fact that it is unethical to do that. He is supportive of pirate politics. Seeing them as, monopolistic, greedy, and corrupt.

[[File:Egirl.png]] Pornography and Prostitution [[File:Egirl.png]]
Mattism believes that Pornography constitutes freedom of speech and expression, and should be allowed for those who are legally old enough to view it. On Prostitution, he believes it's the women's choice to sell her body or not. As long as it's done consensually, then it's perfectly fine, and should be legalized. He thinks the anti-porn movement is stupid, even more stupid and pointless than prohibition.

[[File:Civlibert.png]] Euthanasia [[File:Civlibert.png]]
Mattism supports the legalization of euthanasia, believing that if a mentally ill person chooses to voluntary end their own life, then that is their choice and their choice alone, and for it to be immoral & inhumane to let someone who is suffering when they choose to end their own life to let them continue living.

[[File:Klep.png]] Criminal Justice Reform [[File:Klep.png]]
Mattism believes that systemic racism is still well alive and present within the American justice system, despite how long we've come since Jim crow laws. And, as such, is a supporter of criminal justice reform. On cops, he believes that police unions should still exist, but with their negotiating powers restricted, as the importance of collective bargaining for cops is just as important for any job field, but realizes that the interests of society and police unions often collide, with it having been used to obscure criminal justice reform. With this, he would propose redirecting some of the funds to social programs, but, opposing abolishing or defunding them.

On prisoners and prisons, he opposes capital punishment, and believes that it should be outlawed in all the states. The justice system should focus on rehabilitative justice. With prisoners being allowed to vote once they've finished their prison sentence and have payed the price for their crimes. Along with the state having programs that aid convicts that are released to help them reintegrate into greater society. However, he realizes that some crimes are too bad to forgive. In this case, he would support punitive justice, but with the chance of parole. He opposes the privatization of prisons, as privatized prisons are bad for a rehabilitative justice system were the private contractors are only encouraged to make money, and not help with the reintegration of prisoners into greater society and disregard their own wellbeing makes public safety and the wellbeing of society worse off. However, while he does support racial sensitivity training for police, he believes it shouldn't be based on critical race theory or other  radically progressive things like it.

[[File:Envi.png]] Environmentalism [[File:Envi.png]]
Mattism believes that world governments aren't doing enough to combat climate change, and should put greater investments world wide into green technology. However, he opposes how some green parties opposes nuclear power. As, while it's not perfect, the technology has come a long way, and is the most cost effective and efficient way of combatting global warming right now. Of course, we should work on transitioning out of nuclear power, but until that technology comes, and there's a cost effective way of doing that, we're going to have to rely on it for the time being. Along with supporting government initiatives like the green new deal, even if he has some disagreements with the former. He sees as a necessary step to transitioning out of fossil fuels for the near future, because it may hurt our economy in the short term, the long term benefits of not relying on depleting resources that are slowly making our environmental crisis worse will be felt by future generations. The government must start subsidizing green alternatives to weaken the fossil fuel industry. Although, he would prefer for the government to just nationalize most of these industries relating to natural resources, were these state owned businesses would contribute to a sovereign wealth fund, which would go to things like the welfare state and other government expenditures.

[[File:Modtransh.png]] Technology [[File:Modtransh.png]]
Mattism supports the development of green technology to combat climate change, along with being supportive of  Democratic Transhumanism in terms of things like job automation, as if it is to happen, then that money should go to  social programs to combat the unemployment caused by job automation. However, he can't consider himself a transhumanist because of many reasons. But, he opposes those who think that technological development is bad. So, he's an overall technological moderate, realizing the both good and bad of technological development, he opposes technological acceleration because of the effect it would have on things like the environment, for example. But, he doesn't support slowing technological development as well.

[[File:Reform.png]] Reformism [[File:Reform.png]]
Mattism is a reformist ideology. And, in the context of liberal democracy,  left-reformism would be used to achieve my ideological goals. Seeing as, revolutionary means of achieving ideological change has often resulted in complete failure. However, there are some exceptions to this, being, places were democratic reform isn't possible. In that case, he would support a revolution against the government. Some of these places would include, China,, Russia,  Cuba, and other autocracies in the world that don't respect due process and political rights.

[[File:Blacknat.png]] Slavery Reparations [[File:Blacknat.png]]
Mattism doesn't support slavery reparations, as they are largely unfeasible. And, even if they were feasible, he still wouldn't support them. As, nobody in the present day is responsible for slavery or the actions of their ancestors. But, he does propose increased social funding for neighborhoods, along with getting rid of discriminatory zoning laws that disproportionally effect minority groups. As, this is an actual practical solution compared to just giving effected groups money outright.

[[File:Cball-CSA.png]] Confederate Statues [[File:Cball-CSA.png]]
Mattism supports the tearing down of confederate statues. They were traitors that succeeded from this country that shouldn't be glorified. Any self-described patriot should support the dismantling of the  confederate statues. Along with banning them from being displayed on things like government property. Like, what's next? Are we gonna start building statues for the British monarchy during the war of 1776?

[[File:Deepe.png]] Animal Rights [[File:Deepe.png]]
Mattism supports animal rights. As, animals are living beings at the end of the day. And, while not on the same level as Deep Ecology deep ecology. He supports the the banning of most animal testing. As, animal testing isn't even guaranteed to produce good results, at the cost of inflicting unnecessary suffering to other living beings. He would also improve the living standards of animals being farmed for food, as the way they get treated is just excessively horrific. Although, he isn't going vegan, and doesn't expect anyone else to either.

[[File:Covidism-icon.png]] Vaccine Mandates [[File:Covidism-icon.png]]
Mattism believes that mandating vaccinations is necessary for the eradication of diseases. And, is both pro-vaccination and pro-mandate, but not on the same level as some countries like China. But, he views lockdowns as unfavorable, as they cause economic slowdown. With that, they should only be used during the start of a pandemic when there no vaccine development, with anything further from the release of a vaccine being a betrayal of the vaccinated people. As, while the government should be there to protect people in these types of situations, the excessive use of governmental power leads to the unnecessary expansion of things like surveillance services, as could be seen during the covid pandemic, which he is against.

[[File:FreeSpeak.png]] Freedom of Speech [[File:FreeSpeak.png]]
Mattism supports, seeing it as necessary for a country to keep the market place of ideas running. However, there will be notable restrictions on freedom of speech, such as things like defamation, hate groups, and protecting the public welfare of citizens. So, overall, he thinks freedom of speech should be near absolute, but not absolute. Seeing as a society were all ideas are tolerated would be a society that would eat itself alive, and would fall to the minority of intolerant people who would seek to undue those liberties that allow people to express themselves. He doesn't think outright censoring these groups of people is the right thing to do, he would prefer social ostracism to counter such movements. He is against hate speech laws, seeing them are inherently coercive to civil liberties, and not actually protecting the people said laws seek to protect the people that they are aimed towards. He does, however, hold a couple of exemptions with this view. Like in Germany for example, where it is a crime to deny  the holocaust, given the context of what happened in that region and where it happened, that should indefinitely stay a crime. But, he dislikes how the governments where laws like these are implemented go overboard with these laws as well, so he would loosen up those laws so they're not as strict. But, not eliminating them. So, outside of this few specific circumstances were these laws happen to be in some countries, he would oppose implementing them in other countries.

[[File:Mediastocracy_flair.png]] News and Media [[File:Mediastocracy_flair.png]]
Mattism believes that mainstream media is a decisive tool that has allowed for corporate money to stay on top, with the population being ever so clueless about alternative options, or the way they are being manipluated. Despite this, he thinks bringing back the Fairness Doctrine wouldn't do a whole lot to counteract this problem, mainly due to it being in a time period where it could actually be enforced. A better solution would to directly break up the hegemony of corporate media.

[[File:Laicism.png]] Cultural Secularism [[File:Laicism.png]]
Mattism largely views the decline of spirituality and religion in western society as an inevitability that was going to happen no matter what, and sees it as a good thing. As, it contributes to secularism. And, as such, he thinks that society should be based on secular values and ethics, and is opposed to any sort of religious ethics being the basis for society. Although, nothing that forces the secularization of society, as there will still be religious freedom, and Laicism is too authoritarian and takes away freedom of speech and expression from people. He argues that secularism will rise on its own without the state separating it from the public. This would be achieved through developing the material needs of population to the point were, religious influence subsides, with a rise humanism follow up with it. As, this can be seen in many developed western democracies. Religion should play next to no role in both government and public life, as religion causes too much sectarianism and pointless infighting which gets in the way of globalization. Ideally, religion should become gradually obsolete for the creation a panhumanist identity that surpasses all other identities like race, ethnicity, religion, ect, that further  globalizes and unites humanity.

[[File:7AA75006-F094-416A-8824-CCA033321FA3.png]] Drugs [[File:7AA75006-F094-416A-8824-CCA033321FA3.png]]
Mattism believes that drug war was unilateral disaster, that put many innocent lives in jail, and only contributed to the prison industrial complex. And, he supports the, with soft drugs being completely legalized. Seeing as the "law" cannot even be enforced properly, it being a law in the first place is quite useless. Along with this, all non-violent drug offenders would be released from jail to free up law enforcement resources. However, there should be government programs available that encourage drug addicts to get off of drugs, and find healthier alternatives. As, drugs are a societal problem, not a legal problem. And, throwing people in jail for using these substances only further properates the core issues at heart.

[[File:World.png]] Overview [[File:World.png]]
Mattism, despite his left populist influences, isn't  Anti-American like how would you expect some of them to be. In fact, despite of what he thinks of the elites, the government, and ect. He sees that the West is the lesser evil between the major world powers, as the powers of the West uphold his views more than compared to those of the East. So, he is supportive of a policy of atlanticism. Because, he would prefer to live under Western hegemony compared to the hegemony of other world powers, seeing them as being, more often than not, authoritarian, oppressive, and conservative. Along with supporting pro-democracy movements globally that actively challenge said authoritarian states. As, the west has a moral obligation to support those movements, and use them to actively undermine those states.

He is a diplomatic. Believing that globalization and progress is an inevitability that cannot be stopped even if you tried, due to the nature of it. And, subscribes to international theories related to cosmopolitanism. With this, he is in favor international co-operation and allying with other liberal democracies in the world to promote peace and unity between them as a way to actively combat the rise of authoritarian states. In this regard, he is opposed to isolationism, believing that it has failed nearly each time it has ever been practiced in history, and the  United States has an obligation to help the world through. But, he isn't against nationalism, he would consider himself a civic nationalist. Along with supporting pan-nationalism, seeing as countries that have similar culture ties have the most to gain through co-operation, although without abolishing borders. Despite this, he has a rather protectionist view of trade, as world powers have used trade as a means to in-debt countries, he sees it as  neo-imperialism. So, with this, he supports Alter-Globalization. In terms of the military, he is a, believing that a policy of pacifism as a major power would be Disastrous, and thinks that the military influence of the United States should be kept, albeit in a limited form.

In terms of independence movements, he would consider himself an independence ally, and is sympathetic to people being oppressed under colonialism. This is where his Anti-Colonial stances come from, thinking that people fighting oppression in authoritative regimes should have the right to self-determination. However, he views independence movements in countries that aren't fighting against authoritarianism with suspicion.

[[File:Globnat.png]] Alternative Globalization [[File:Globnat.png]]
Mattism is a diplomatically globalist ideology, believing that the endgoal of humanity should be to eventually unite together in some sort of global alliance as opposed to  uniting world governments into a decentralized world government to combat the problems of the modern day. And, shuns the label "anti-globalist", as that is very much not true. He views a globalized world as an inevitability that should be embraced. However, he opposes the bad side effects of globalism, and what he calls "corporate globalism". Such as: environmental degradation, worker exploitation, wealth inequality, and more. So, he would call himself an alter-globalist. Believing that, "a new world is possible", and that globalism can be shaped to serve the people globally, and not the interest of wealthy corpocratic elites. Were, national sovereignty, culture, economic equality, and all of the above I did not mention are respected. With international co-operation still in effect. As, some sort of global alliance that unites humanity could introduce things like universal tax codes that make offshoring wealth for the elites impossible, the benefits are really endless.

His international theories follow that of cosmopolitanism, such as democratic globalization and cosmopolitan democracy. However, for as long as authoritarian states in the world that do not respect human rights exist, this will not be possible to achieve. How he would actually plan to achieve this? He would be to use the global hegemony of the West to counter those authoritarian states in the world that actively pose threats to world peace, which will be explained somewhere on this page.

[[File:SocialistPatriot.png]] Social Patriotism [[File:SocialistPatriot.png]]
Mattism argues that being a cosmopolitan and a  nationalist are not contradictory points to hold, as loving ones nation doesn't immediately equal chauvinism or wanting to put it above others. In fact, he loves the United States because of its global achievements on bringing western powers together on the international stage, and how its contributed to the further globalization of the world. So, he would consider himself a left-wing nationalist and a  civic nationalist, as a love for one's nation is what keeps its cultures and society at large together, and has contributed to anti-imperial contributions by countries fighting for their independence against imperial powers. However, he opposes cultural conservatism as well, believing it to be too exclusionary and closeminded, which leads to  cultural chauvinism and not being accepting of foreigners even if they could provide a great benefit to the host country. As said in the immigration part of his page, he prefers a melting pot model were other cultures different from that of the national culture contribute to a greater national identity. This model also contributes to pan-nationalist movements as well. He also despises chauvinists, not seeing them as real  patriots of their country, but just as  edgy degenerates. One's nation and values should be shared off of a common culture and way of life instead of pointless things like  ethnicity or  race.

[[File:Ecoglob.png]] Environmental Globalization [[File:Ecoglob.png]]
Mattism defends climate treaties like the Paris Agreement and other ones that , believing that we have to  look past our own borders to solve climate change and work with all countries globally, as it is an issue that will effect more than just us. Developed countries should be actively pressured to adopting climate protections and work together with other countries to develop technology that can solve global warming. However, developing countries won't be pressured as much, as they should still conserve their environment, but world powers are the greater evils in this situation. So, some destruction of developing countries environments for economic growth is fine, if it means they industrialize so they can be pressured into conserving their environment in the same way global powers will.

[[File:Atlanticism.png]] Atlanticism [[File:Atlanticism.png]]
Looking at the current state of geopolitics, Mattism defends the west, believing that western civilization is the best and most civilized one to have had ever existed, compared to all other civillizations that have existed, as the west has contributed the most to egalitarian progressive values. With the East being filled with brutal dictatorships that do not respect human rights, political rights, or progressive values. With this, he is in favor of United States hegemony on the global stage, and a policy of  atlanticism, and is against the hemogony of both second and thirld world countries. Believing that the hegemony of western powers has done more to develop the world, ensure  peace, and contribute to  progressive values. However, western hemogony obviously doesn't go uncriticized from him. He is critical of the increasing authoritarianism in western countries and the unjust military interventions. But, even with all of that considered, he considers the hemogony to be less destructive to that of the hemogony of eastern powers. So, that hegemony should be actively used to undermine the authoritarian states like China or  Russia. Along with using that hegemony to globally promote values such as: human rights,  civil liberties,  democracy,  world peace and global co-operation,  environmental causes,  economic equality, and  progressive values.

[[File:Protect.png]] Trade [[File:Protect.png]]
Mattism believes that countries should trade with each other when it benefits them, seeing trade as one of the driving forces in the growth of an economy, and  excessive protectionist polices a determinant to that. There have been many times in history were excessive protectionist policies have completely backed fired, which lead to the decrease of economic growth and competitiveness of the economy on the world stage because of goods that couldn't have been easily produced in said country could be brought to the country through trade. However, he opposes free trade. Seeing as, it has allowed the outsourcing of American jobs to poor countries, increased the profit margins of massive corporations and elites, and has, overall, contributed to the corporatocratic state we are currently living in. So, he is vehemently against outsourcing our jobs to countries like China, or countries were the working conditions are poorer of that of the host country. And, is in favor of leaving free trade agreements like NATFA. So, he would call himself a fair-trade protectionist, believing that trade agreements should be at the best interests of both countries. With this, he favors low tariffs, and liberalized trade with countries with good relations of the  United States. So, trading with authoritarian regimes like China is bad, but trade with  American allies is good. As, that trade can be used to lower the cost of goods we need, while relying less on said authoritarian states to produce them, with promoting better relations between the trading states. Believing that, being inter-dependent with other economies and working together with them isn't bad, and tariffs should be low as possible to encourage growth as they aren't ultimately good for the economy in the long-term, but complete free-trade with other economies and the economic globalization into them leads to economic degradation were the wealth being generated is only going to the elite class of billionaires without going down to the working people. So, in this regard, he is anti-globalist in the sense of economic globalization.

Despite is pro-western stances, he encourages developing countries to form economic trade blocs that rival both eastern and western powers, as a way to keep both of the blocs from exploiting them. This would improve things like wages and environmental protections for said countries, with the added benefit of not being too reliant on either bloc.

[[File:Cball-China.png]] China [[File:Cball-China.png]]
The CCP is a pseudo-fascist  totalitarian dictatorship that  doesn't respect human rights or civil liberties, and  is actively commiting the largest human rights abuse since the holocaust. Along with no respect for their own environment or workers rights. Mattism believes that, with all of this in mind, and a lot more, he thinks it's the best interest of the West to contain the influence of the CCP, and their evil practices from spreading. As, the Chinese government has shown to not care for the welfare of its people, and has proven the world time and time again that it is the biggest threat to world peace. The international community should work together to actively condemn China, and to stop their human rights abuses. As well, he would support a democratic uprising against the current Chinese government, similar to that of the Tiananmen Square protests. As, the CCP is not the legitimate ruling party of China. Not even the economic model of China redeems the country, as it's all built off of fraud and corrupt that feeds off of being addicted to debt to keep its system running, with previously stated not having any significant welfare systems or workers protections.

However, despite how bad China is and how satisfying it would be for the real China to take over the mainland, we can't just go in a dick-swinging contest with the CCP just because we can, as we need to maintain some level of mutual relationship with the CCP, while also condemning their actions. There are some areas we need to co-operate with the Chinese government on, such as environmental issues, as China is a major power that is contributing to global warming. We should be pursuing a policy of realpolitik with the CCP.

[[File:Cball-US.png]] United States [[File:Cball-US.png]]
Mattism is a patriotic ideology, and he loves his own country for many reasons. One of the main reasons is how he is better off in these Western institutions which are able to care for their disabled residents more than those of third or second world countries which has allowed him to live better off in society, and the achievements the United States has contributed to the world as a whole. But, he dislikes the current state of his country a lot if that wasn't obvious, and he wants to greatly change how things are. He wants the United States to stop meddling in the affairs of other countries, and start pursuing closer diplomatic ties with them to push them towards the United States sphere of global hemogony to counter the hegemony of states like  China, as that will be more beneficial towards us as a nation on the geopolitical stage. With this, he would use the United States influence within the American continent to pursue a  Pan-American union between all of the countries that are in good relations with the  United States, as this is would be a good way to  achieve peace, defend  democratic states, and promote unity on the continent. It would primarily serve as a military defense pact. But also, to an extent, an economic union as well.

[[File:Cball-Taiwan.png]] Taiwan [[File:Cball-Taiwan.png]]
Mattism fully supports Taiwan over this dispute, and believes that the  Chinese government has no legitimate authority in claiming the Taiwanese island or messing with the national sovereignty of another country. Taiwan itself is the most based state in East Asia compared to its neighbors like Japan or South Korea, with it being the mot progressive and an actual functioning democracy that respects human rights. He is also a staunch supporter of Taiwanese independence on the international stage, along with giving his full and critical support for the  Milk Tea Alliance, and the  Hong Kong Protesters. Along with this, he supports the United States in militarily defending  Taiwan if the  CCP ever launched a military invasion of the Island. As, we have to make it clear that the West is willing to stand up to authoritarian states in the world. Although, that probably would never happen anyways, as the Chinese government is a paper tiger that's all talk and no bite. Suck it, pseudo-fascist fifty cent army dengoids, Taiwan is a real country, cope and seethe.

[[File:Cball-Russia.png]] Russia [[File:Cball-Russia.png]]
Mattism believes that Russia's territorial expansions should, in absolutely zero way, be recognized. And, that all the lands stolen should be given back to their neighbors. And, he condemns the invasion of Ukraine, believing that this war must be a devastating defeat for  Putin. He supports the Russian opposition party to that of United Russia, being Russia of the Future. Along with this, he supports other opposition parties like the Russian United Democratic Party.

[[File:Cball-Ukraine.png]] Ukraine [[File:Cball-Ukraine.png]]
While Mattism obviously doesn't support Russia, as they are an oppressive  authoritarian conservative dictatorship, he also doesn't fully support  Ukraine either. As, both of our governments have common enemies that we should work together against, he also realizes that Ukraine suffers some of the same issues Russia does, but less severe. With this, he would favor Ukrainian admission into NATO, as that's what has kept Eastern Europe from falling into chaos like Ukraine after Putin invaded and kept peace in the region, but he doesn't take a stance on Ukrainian admission into the  European Union, and believes that should be left up for the people to decide themselves. As, he has his own issues with the organization, even if it is progressive.

[[File:Cball-Belarus.png]] Belarus [[File:Cball-Belarus.png]]
Mattism sides with the Belarusian opposition parties, believing that  Lukashenko's government is not the legitimate ruling party of Belarus. And, is supportive of Sviatlana Tsikhanouskaya. As, the Belarusian people deserve fair and free elections, and a legitimate government. Not some Putin backed puppet dictatorship that doesn't have the best interest of the people's minds at heart.

[[File:Cball-Hungary.png]] Hungary [[File:Cball-Hungary.png]]
Mattism is against the current ruling party of FIDESZ. As, it is slowly chipping away the remaining democracy Hungary has, and is a  Russian asset as well. He supports the sanctioning of Orban's government by the  European Union. As, Europe doesn't need any pointless infighting, and the current government of Hungary is destroying it's own country in the process. He supports the opposition coalition that oppose his government. And, would support a peaceful revolution by the opposition as well, as Hungary is in dire need of some political change to keep it from going down the destructive path it's going.

[[File:Cball-Iraq.png]] Iraq [[File:Cball-Iraq.png]]
Despite how bad Saddam Hussein was, the military invasion had no grounds for happening, wasted billions of tax payer dollars, completely failed at nation building and establishing a functioning  republic, and lead to the complete destabilization of the region which caused  ISIS to take control of the territory they did. He is against the invasion done by the neocons. He will support Rojava against  Ba'athists and  terrorists, ect.

[[File:Cball-Poland.png]] Poland [[File:Cball-Poland.png]]
The polish government needs to open up its government, stop its  corrupt, and destructive practices. He supports the opposition party to Law and Justice, being  Lewica. As, Poland doesn't need to go down the same fate  Hungary will go down if they don't stop. And, would support a peaceful revolution against the current Polish government by the opposition parties.

[[File:Cball-Greece.png]] Greece [[File:Cball-Greece.png]]
Mattism realizes that both the European Union and the  Greek government are at fault for the situation. As, the Greek government was corrupt as shit, and lied about its debt so it could get into the economic union. While, the Greek government was further indebted by bad loans given to it to try to bail it out. So, he leans on siding with the European Union in this case, but still realizes that both sides were bad. Overall, it is important that we help Greece out of their financial crisis, because they play an important role for our strategy in the Mediterranean.

[[File:Cball-Kosovo.png]] Kosovo [[File:Cball-Kosovo.png]]
Mattism supports Kosovo in their right to self-determination and independence. However, Kosovo would be better off integrating into  Albania. As, it's very unlikely to get internationally recognized as an independent country, so that would be the second best outcome to achieve its independence from Serbia.

[[File:Cball-Syria.png]] Syria [[File:Cball-Syria.png]]
Mattism supports withdrawing most of our troops from Syria, and its related regions. We should focus on working together with other countries to defeat ISIS and other related terrorist groups in the region, as that should take priority first. Along with supporting the Kurdish rebels, as they deserve independence and the right to self-determination for everything they've been through in this conflict. Assad's regime must be opposed, as Assad has started this entire conflict, and is a corrupt and brutal dictator. Fighting the humanitarian crisis caused by the civil war and the displaced people's should also take priority as well, as the mass immigration of refugees from the Middle East has to stop.

[[File:Cball-Saudi.png]] Saudi Arabia [[File:Cball-Saudi.png]]
Mattism doesn't support allying ourselves with Saudi Arabia, a country with no records of human rights or political freedom. We shouldn't be cozying up to dictators who go against our own values because they have something to offer us, especially with what happened with the news reporters, funding terrorist groups, and stuff related to that.

[[File:Cball-Iran.png]] Iran [[File:Cball-Iran.png]]
Mattism supports the United States in working together with Iran were it is needed, like the  nuclear arms disarmament, but opposed in other Areas like their horrific human rights records. It is important that we maintain diplomatic relations with the Iranian government due to these reasons.

[[File:Cball-Afghanistan.png]] Afghanistan [[File:Cball-Afghanistan.png]]
While Mattism doesn't support the Taliban taking over Afghanistan, he supports the withdrawal of American troops from Afghanistan. Because, we were fighting an endless war we were never bound to win, that was costing us billions of dollars every year. We should've pulled out as soon as we got the guy we wanted. However, he doesn't support how president Biden withdrew troops from Afghanistan in the way that it happened. As, it wasn't carefully thought out, and we just ended up intervening in other places anyways. He would support a full withdrawal from these conflicts. Ideally, Afghanistan should have a democratic and  secular government to combat the Islamo fundies and other religious conflict in the region.

[[File:Cball-Yugoslavia.png]] Yugoslavia [[File:Cball-Yugoslavia.png]]
Mattism supports the military intervention in  Yugoslavia. As, it was a humanitarian intervention that was necessary to stop the ethnic genocide by  Serbian troops in  Kosovo.

[[File:Thailand.png]] Thailand [[File:Thailand.png]]
WIP

[[File:Cball-India.png]] India [[File:Cball-India.png]]
Mattism supports allying ourselves with India, but oppose Modi and other  radical hindu nationalists as well. As, the caste system in India's society has largely been shaped by the  religious influence in the country itself. India is an important player in world politics, and it is important to uphold democratic institutions within the country and  peace within the region.

[[File:Chavismo.png]] Venezuela [[File:Chavismo.png]]
Mattism doesn't support the current government of Venezuela, but also doesn't support the  United States meddling in the affairs of  Venezuela as well. We should try to amend the relations between our government and theirs while actively condemning the violence and everything else that has happened. Ideally, the rule of law and fair elections should be reestablished, and the current government should step down.

[[File:Cball-Libya.png]] Libya [[File:Cball-Libya.png]]
Mattism is against the intervention in Libya. Because, despite how bad Gaddafi was, it doesn't justify what the  neoconservatives did. As, going in and destabilizing the country further just replaced Gaddafi's regime with  terrorists groups.

[[File:Cball-North_Korea.png]] North Korea [[File:Cball-North_Korea.png]]
Mattism obviously doesn't like North Korea as a state, they are our foreign adversary. And, he considers the concept of Juche to have completely failed in its entirety, as it isn't even socialist in the modern day, just more closer to  state capitalism and  Third Positionism. So, North Korea is by most definitions, and failed state, and has no real right to exist on the geopolitical stage. Nor can he side with a country in any context that he would've been considered a useless eater in and killed (North Korea kills babies with birth defects like down syndrome and treats its mentally disabled residents nearly the same way Nazi Germany did, you get the point).

[[File:Cball-South_Korea.png]] South Korea [[File:Cball-South_Korea.png]]
Mattism would support South Korea in taking over  North Korea over this dispute, but that doesn't mean he support South Korea fully. As their society is his anti-thesis and rampant with corrupt oligarchical rule and is a late capitalist hell scape. So, South Korea as a government and as a society needs to greatly improve if they want his full unconditional support to take over the Korean Peninsula. But, given the choice next is a country that is a totalitarian hell hole which is a failed state with no respect for  human rights, he would choose the lesser evil in this instance.

[[File:Strato.png]] The Military [[File:Strato.png]]
Mattism is in favor of defunding the national budget of the military, as it is way too bloated for the national security of our country. Along with the thousands of lives that are taken each year in conflicts we intervene in that only benefit the military industrial complex. But, the military should still receive adequate funding for the defense of our national security, as we still need to defend our allies and our international interests, but we can't go bossing other countries around just because we have the diplomatic weight to do so.

[[File:Pac.png]] Non-Interventionism [[File:Pac.png]]
Mattism rejects entangling our troops into other countries just for the sake of combatting the rise of authoritarian states and spreading "democracy". As, this leads to forever endless wars that waste billions of dollars in tax payer money just for the military industrial complex without any actual plans for nation building, which our government doesn't have a good track record with. And, while he holds no sympathies towards said authoritarian states, and would prefer for them to be overthrown and turn into liberal democracies. He is supportive of a  foreign policy. Believing that pacifism as a major power would be destructive and open a power vacuum for other more destructive countries to take hold of. We should abandon most of our military bases outside of our allies to save billions of dollars in tax payer money. Instead of focusing on wasting our resources in other countries, we should focus on our own domestic affairs. The only time military intervening in other countries is justifiable is if for humanitarian reasons, the backing of civil unrest groups in undemocratic countries, or if a country has attacked our allies. The presence of our military in the world has caused nothing but suffering for developing countries, and we cannot police the world in this aspect, and we should accept that.

[[File:Internat.png]] Foreign Aid [[File:Internat.png]]
Mattism views foreign aid as a double edged sword. On one hand, when use rightly, it can actually helped underdeveloped countries in need and prevent the deaths of thousands of people through humanitarian aid. But, on the other, it can be used by corrupt officials to further their own wealth, while leaving very little of the population it was intended to be given too. But, in spite of all of this, he still has a rather favorable view of foreign aid, seeing as the United States has helped prevent the deaths of countless people through its foreign aid programs, he is very much in favor of increasing the amount of foreign aid given to countries. Seeing it as a tool that can be used to further positive relations with the US, and for peaceful diplomacy. So, that money that is given through foreign aid will pay itself back in international influence, which is critical for the foreign policy of the  United States on the international stage.

[[File:Cball-EU.png]] European Union [[File:Cball-EU.png]]
Mattism supports the European Union as an idea, seeing how it has brought Europe closer together, has been a force for good for the  progressive movement, and has brought peace and prosperity to Europe. So, he has no issue with EU membership itself, and believes for it to be an overall net-positive for the countries in the union. However, he does oppose the more neoliberal policies of the union, seeing it as increasing to the wealth inequality within Europe. So, he would be a  in this regard, and believes that the bureaucratic bodies of the union must go through reforms to fit the modern day if it is to survive the future. He supports the Schengen area the most out of all policies within the European Union, believing that free travel between its member states is an overall net good, but would like to have some policies be transferred to the countries within the European Union like immigration and trade policy. He is more open to reforming the institutions he takes issue with than outright abolishing it. He opposes the idea of a untied europe, seeing as it is largely impratical, and would either become undemocratic, or fall apart entirely due the massive amounts of disagreements within and between European governments. And, with this, he is supportive of the European Union in sanctioning authoritative governments that are faltering on having democracy like  Poland. As, the union should do everything in its legal authority to uphold human rights and democracy in the countries residing in it.

On Brexit and other movements that want to leave the European Union, he is against them. Mostly because, they are neo-nationalist movements that will only leave the country off in a worse state than if the country had stayed in the economic union. And on left-wing populists that want to leave the European Union, he opposes that too, as he is a  reformist in this regard as mentioned. And, while he doesn't have a problem with immigration, as it is a good way to fix our demographic crisis, he dislikes what happened during the immigration crisis of 2015. Because, letting in that much immigrants at once for any country would cause immediate conflict, and caused the rise of said right-wing populists to take hold in Europe. So, he would take a more of a culturally conservative  attitude when it comes to immigrants coming to European countries from the Middle east. He defends the immigration policies of European countries, as they've shown to not assimilate well into the societies they are placed in. Although, he still disagrees with the hardline stances some of the member states have, believing that they turn away refugees and immigrants even when they could be of massive utility for the country just out of xenophobia, and would agree with liberalizing immigration from these countries, so long as there are programs there for the immigrants that come from these countries to assimilate so they don't disrupt the way of life for people.

[[File:Cball-UN.png]] United Nations [[File:Cball-UN.png]]
Mattism believes that the United Nations doesn't really do a whole lot, but sees the organization as a useful tool for peaceful diplomacy. And, as such, is supportive of the United States to remain within the  United Nations. But, he would reform the institutions of the United Nations to be more democratic, more representative of its members, and to make governments actually accountable on the world stage. Seeing as, international law is something that doesn't exist, and is largely made up by big powers. But, still wanting international law, seeing as it could get us closer to world peace.

However, he is skeptical of using international organizations like the United Nations to  further integrate world governments into federations. And, while not despising the concept of this, he sees it as largely impractical, and a tool of neoliberal globalists to further push their agenda. Although, if it was done under alternative globalist means, he wouldn't have a whole lot of an issue with it. Given, the process is entirely voluntary.

On it's agencies like the IMF, WTO, OECD, ect. Mattism opposes them. As, these organizations have been forces for good, they've have also indebted third world countries and contributed to economic exploitation of said countries.

[[File:Cball-Japan.png]] Japan [[File:Cball-Japan.png]]
Mattism, while liking a lot of the media that comes from this country, also realizes that its society and government are his anti-thesis in a lot of ways. He supports the complete abolition of the Japanese monarchy, and the establishment of a fully functioning  republic. Along with this, the current Japanese government needs to stop denying its war crimes committed during World War 2, and formerly apologize to all of its neighbors effected by such crimes. Along with being less xenophobic. As, the only practical way to save Japan's economy from its aging population is to let immigrants in to replace the workforce, which the current government refuses to do. But, even then, that probably wouldn't save Japans stagnating and failing society. And, while the media of the country is good, the society is my anti-thesis in a lot of ways. The current party is just a neo-con imperialist party and is a one party dominant system, although it is considerably better than the alternatives. He will support Japan against forces like  China,  Russia, ect. As, Japan plays a very important and strategic role in the  east Asia for the  United States, and other allies related in that region. And, would support the creation of some Pan-Asian union between all the countries in the region that would include Japan to defend against Russian and Chinese influences in the region.

[[File:Pan-Nationalism.png]] Pan-Nationalism [[File:Pan-Nationalism.png]]
Mattism encourages countries of similar cultures to integrate with each other in terms of co-operation, as they have the most to gain from international co-operation. The one's he would support the most is pan-americanism. As, he wants to use United States hegemony to promote peaceful co-existence in American continent. Other pan-nationalism movements he would support are pan-oceanianism and  pan-europeanism. seeing this as a useful means of countering the Imperial powers of that of the East. And, this could, hypothetically speaking, be praxis to achieve a world government. But, he just wants more international co-operation between these countries, not to abolish borders. But, if this method was done through democratic means, then he would have very little issue with abolishing borders and turning the countries into federations.

[[File:Castro.png]] Cuba [[File:Castro.png]]
In spite of what he thinks of the Cuban government, he thinks that the blockade against them is unjust, and should be lifted. However, the current government isn't some anti-imperialist baston that is "resisting westoid imperialism", it's just a brutal dictatorship that surpresses any personal rights of its citizens. And, with this, he promptly sides with the cuban protesters. And, would support a revolution against the current Cuban government by the Cuban people, as they deserve a lot better than what they currently have. Not some authoritarian, corrupt, and brutal dictatorship. They deserve a democratic and fair government.

[[File:Necon.png]] NATO [[File:Necon.png]]
Mattism holds a rather favorable view of NATO as an alliance, thinking that progressives who oppose it are misinformed, as it has also been a force for good for the  progressive movement. Along with NATO being necessary for the defense of Europe. But, with this in mind, he doesn't like some aspects of the alliance. That mainly being, the alliance not requiring its members to maintain its democratic status, being a purely defensive alliance, and it being too centric on the United States. He would've been in favor of abolishing the alliance for a collective security council, but seeing the way things are recently going with current events, the alliance has shown to still have a purpose, and he will still continue to support its existence. As, liberal democracies across the world need to be united in the 21st century in the fight against authoritarian states. Which, NATO is currently one of the biggest alliances that stands as a strong buffer against said authoritarian states, to which he will support the alliance in the case when its standing up to them.

[[File:Zio.png]] Israel [[File:Zio.png]]
Mattism doesn't support Israel, their government needs to stop its brutal policies of neo-colonialism against the  Arabs. Along with dropping our international support for Israel, and stop giving them our tax paying dollars. As, the current government is strong enough on its own to fend for itself. But, he's not opposed to Israel existing as a state, as Israel has the right to self-determination, like all countries do. And, in all honesty, a part of him would prefer Israel over Palestine personally, as it is a functioning western democracy, but ultimately refrains from taking a stand of being against or for Israel, he just wants to pull out of this region because It's not our fight to fight. We should be supporting Israel and Palestine together in peace deals that stabilize the region from further conflict.

[[File:Cball-Palestine.png]] Palestine [[File:Cball-Palestine.png]]
Mattism doesn't support Palestine, as their government needs to drop Hamas, and other terrorist organizations related to its government. As, the brutality shown by the Palestinian government is on par with that of Israeli government. As, he's not opposed to Palestine existing, but they need to drop their ethnic centrism down to  civic nationalism, like  Israel should. Ideally, both governments should collapse. And, in their place, a democratic government that is based on secular governance and  civic nationalism that is made for both Israelis and Palestinians. But, seeing as that's idealistic, he would support a two state solution with similar terms. As, Palestine should be allowed to peacefully co-exist with Israel, and have the right to self-determination.

Party lore
Sometime during the 1950's, there was infighting between new deal liberals and liberals who wanted to preserve the current status quo to an extent. Which caused the split of the democratic party to form the United Progressive Front. This party mainly persists of progressives, with some modern liberals who are more progressive than that of the more centrist democratic party. The faction with the most influence is the progressive liberal faction, with the socialist faction and the modern liberal faction having roughly the same amount of influence between them. There also consists a few subset of left-libertarians who range from social democrats to libertarian socialists. The party would end up being called the "United progressive front".

Progressive Liberal Caucus

 * [[File:Socdem.png]] Social Democracy
 * [[File:Socgeo.png]] Social Georgism
 * [[File:Leftpop-0.png]] Left-Wing Populism
 * [[File:Progress.png]] Progressivism
 * [[File:Globnat.png]] Alter-Globalization
 * [[File:Envi.png]] Environmentalism

Socialist Caucus

 * [[File:Marketsoc.png]] Market Socialism
 * [[File:Liberalsoc.png]] Liberal Socialism
 * [[File:Dsa.png]] Democratic Socialism
 * [[File:Leftpop-0.png]] Left-Wing Populism
 * [[File:Socgeo.png]] Social Georgism
 * [[File:Ecosoc.png]] Eco-Socialism

Modern Liberal Caucus

 * [[File:Soclib.png]] Social Liberalism
 * [[File:Soccap.png]] Social Capitalism
 * [[File:Neotech.png]] Technoliberalism
 * [[File:Glib.png]] Green Liberalism
 * [[File:Pop.png]] Populism
 * [[File:Progress.png]] Progressivism

Liberty Caucus

 * [[File:LibSocDemIcon.png]] Libertarian Social Democracy
 * [[File:Socliber.png]] Social Libertarianism
 * [[File:Civlibert.png]] Civil Libertarianism
 * [[File:Thar.png]] Anti-Authoritarianism
 * [[File:Leftpop-0.png]] Left-Wing Populism
 * [[File:Envi.png]] Environmentalism

Favorite quotes
Quotes from Individuals = “Anyone can deal with victory. Only the mighty can bear defeat.” - Adolf Hitler (He lost lmao)

“In twelve years from now, you will not recognize Berlin.” -  Adolf Hitler (He lost lmao)

"All you have to do is kick in the door and the whole rotten structure will crumble to the ground." - Adolf Hitler (He lost lmao)

“the harder the conflict, the greater the triumph.” - George Washington

“Being all equal and independent, no one ought to harm another in his life, health, liberty, or possessions.” - John Locke

"The love for all living creatures is the most noble attribute of man." - Charles Darwin

“Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the universe.” - Albert Einstein

“Peace cannot be kept by force, it can only be achieved by understanding.” - Albert Einstein

“If a free society cannot help the many who are poor, it cannot save the few who are rich." - John Kennedy

“Mankind must put an end to war - or war will put an end to mankind." -  John Kennedy

“If by a "Liberal" they mean someone who looks ahead and not behind, someone who welcomes new ideas without rigid reactions, someone who cares about the welfare of the people-their health, their housing, their schools, their jobs, their civil rights and their civil liberties-someone who believes we can break through the stalemate and suspicions that grip us in our policies abroad, if that is what they mean by a "Liberal", then I'm proud to say I'm a "Liberal.” -  John Kennedy

"People hate politicians. And I can understand why." - Alexei Navalny

"I am not in politics for power. I am in it for justice." - Sviatlana Tsikhanouskaya

"The world will not accept dictatorship or domination." - Mikhail Gorbachev

“Peace is not unity in similarity but unity in diversity, in the comparison and conciliation of differences.” - Mikhail Gorbachev

"I'm for the poor man - all poor men, black and white, they all gotta have a chance. They gotta have a home, a job, and a decent education for their children. 'Every man a king' - that's my slogan." - Huey Long

“Capitalism is the astounding belief that the most wickedest of men will do the most wickedest of things for the greatest good of everyone.” - John Maynard Keynes

“The difficulty lies, not in the new ideas, but in escaping from the old ones.” - John Maynard Keynes

"Although it is not true that all conservatives are stupid people, it is true that most stupid people are conservative." - John Stuart Mill

"All silencing of discussion is an assumption of infallibility." - John Stuart Mill

"Whatever crushes individuality is despotism, by whatever name it may be called and whether it professes to be enforcing the will of God or the injunctions of men." - John Stuart Mill

"Pleasure and freedom from pain, are the only things desirable as ends." - John Stuart Mill

So Long as we do not harm others we should be free to think, speak, act, & live as we see fit, without molestation from individuals, law, or gov't.

- John Stuart Mill

“America will never be destroyed from the outside. If we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves.” - Abraham Lincoln

“Those who deny freedom to others, deserve it not for themselves” -  Abraham Lincoln

“As President Franklin Delano Roosevelt reminded us: “The test of our progress is not whether we add more to the abundance of those who have much, it is whether we provide enough for those who have little.” - Bernie Sanders

"All tyrannies rule through fraud and force, but once the fraud is exposed they must rely exclusively on force." - George Orwell

"However much you deny the truth, the truth goes on existing." - George Orwell

“When one thinks of all the people who support or have supported Fascism, one stands amazed at their diversity. What a crew! Think of a programme which at any rate for a while could bring Hitler, Petain, Montagu Norman, Pavelitch, William Randolph Hearst, Streicher, Buchman, Ezra Pound, Juan March, Cocteau, Thyssen, Father Coughlin, the Mufti of Jerusalem, Arnold Lunn, Antonescu, Spengler, Beverley Nichols, Lady Houston, and Marinetti all into the same boat! But the clue is really very simple. They are all people with something to lose, or people who long for a hierarchical society and dread the prospect of a world of free and equal human beings. Behind all the ballyhoo that is talked about ‘godless’ Russia and the ‘materialism’ of the working class lies the simple intention of those with money or privileges to cling to them. Ditto, though it contains a partial truth, with all the talk about the worthlessness of social reconstruction not accompanied by a ‘change of heart’. The pious ones, from the Pope to the yogis of California, are great on the’ change of heart’, much more reassuring from their point of view than a change in the economic system.” - George Orwell

“The only thing we have to fear is fear itself.” - Franklin Roosevelt

“The liberty of a democracy is not safe if the people tolerated the growth of private power to a point where it becomes stronger than the democratic state itself. That in its essence is fascism: ownership of government by an individual, by a group, or any controlling private power.” - Franklin Roosevelt

“Democracy cannot succeed unless those who express their choice are prepared to choose wisely. The real safeguard of democracy, therefore, is education.” - Franklin Roosevelt

“Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere.” - Martin Luther King Jr.

“We must live together as brothers or perish together as fools.” - Martin Luther King Jr.

“I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin but by the content of their character.” - Martin Luther King Jr.

"Ultimately, saying that you don't care about privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different from saying you don't care about freedom of speech because you have nothing to say." - Edward Snowden

“These programs were never about terrorism: they're about economic spying, social control, and diplomatic manipulation. They're about power.” - Edward Snowden

“Under observation, we act less free, which means we effectively are less free.” - Edward Snowden

"We long to have a home where civil freedoms are respected, where our children will not be subject to mass surveillance, abuse of human rights, political censorship and mass incarceration." - Joshua Wong My own quotes =

These are either from discord or some other sites
"You're not ""based and redpilled"" you just discovered politics from playing the TNO mod in hoi4"

- Matteel

"Does it look like I give a fuck? No, I don't. I am completely undeterred, I will do what makes me happy."

- Matteel

"I DON'T LIKE FEMBOYS I AM A STRAIGHT MALE REEEEEEE"

- Matteel

"God, I wish that were me"

- Matteel

"YOU ARE NOT A GERMAN MONARCHIST, YOU ARE AN AMERICAN WHO LIVES IN NORTH DAKOTA WHO JUST DISCOVERED POLITICS FROM PLAYING KAISERREICH"

- Matteel

"Yes, the world is ran by a liberal elite of homosexual Jews who control all of our institutions and banks, is that an issue fagscist?"

- Matteel

User Relationship Quiz
WIP (This is going through a complete rework, please don't touch until I'm done) This quiz is to gauge how much you are in agreement with my ideology, you will earn points the more you agree with my ideological stances. Economic Societal Issues Governance Foreign
 * 1. I support a tightly regulated capitalist economy with central planning/corporatism +1
 * I support some regulations in a capitalist framework/socialism with a free market +0.5
 * I am anti-economics/support a free market economy/communism or other utopic forms of economics +0
 * 2. Banks should be public but not nationalized +1
 * Banks should be nationalized by the government +0.5
 * The central bank should be replaced with some alternative +0
 * 3. I support land reform and getting rid of both rent and landlords +1
 * I support LVT and landlords/widespread ownership of land +0.5
 * I support propertarianism +0
 * 4. Healthcare should be free and universal +1
 * Healthcare should be multi-payer, but not free +0.5
 * Healthcare is not a human right that should be afforded by the government +0
 * 5. Billionaires should be allowed to exist, but should pay their fair share in taxes and not offshore their wealth. Along with there should be a hard wealth cap. The same thing said applies to millionaires +1
 * Billionaires shouldn't exist, but millionaires can +0.5
 * It's their money, they should be able to use it how they want to/all wealth should be equally redistributed equally +0
 * 6. I support fair markets and believe in the creation of new anti-trust laws to fit the modern day to combat monopolies +1
 * Monopolies should be broken up but new anti-trust laws aren't necessary and the government shouldn't favor small businesses over big businesses +0.5
 * Monopolies should never be broken up because the free market will solve our problems/corporations shouldn't exist at all +0
 * 7. I support a progressive tax system 1+
 * I support a flat tax system 0.5
 * I support no taxation or a regressive tax system
 * 8. The welfare state should be expanded to provide for people's basic needs, and be universal +1
 * A small/medium sized welfare state should exist, but I'm against universal welfare +0.5
 * I support some alternative to welfare/the welfare state should only be given to the most dependable people in society/I'm against welfare at all +0
 * 9. The workforce should have strong presence of unionization to fight for workers rights +1
 * Unions should exist, but I prefer guilds/unions are bad more than they are good/Unions should be used to transition into socialism +0.5
 * I'm anti-union +0
 * 10. Corporate welfare should be ended for large businesses as if a business is too big to fail it is too big to exist +1
 * Corporate welfare shouldn't be given to big business, but we also shouldn't subsidize other forms of industry as well +0.5
 * Corporate welfare should be used to bail out big businesses +0
 * 1. Social progressivism is based and necessary for the progression of humanity +1
 * I am a cultural left-leaning centrist +0.5
 * I am socially conservative/leaning conservative +0
 * 2. Pornography and Prostitution should both be legalized because one has the right to use their body how they please +1
 * Pornography should be allowed but not prostitution +0.5
 * Both porn and prostitution should be banned +0
 * 3. LGBT Rights should be protected and It's wrong to discriminate against people for their sexuality even if there's some elements of pride I disagree with +1
 * They can have their rights, but I'm against pride culture. +0.5
 * The LGBT community should have their rights reversed back to civil unions/shouldn't have full marriage rights/should be actively persecuted. +0
 * 4.I support individualism in terms of community +1
 * I am mildly individualist 0.5+
 * I support communitarianism/mass collectivism/mass individualism 0+
 * 5.I am a civil libertarian +1
 * I am a civil moderate + 0.5
 * I am a civil authoritarian 0+
 * 6. Abortion is a form of healthcare and reproductive rights should be protected +1
 * Abortion should be allowed for only the first month + 0.5
 * Abortion shouldn't be allowed in any case 0+
 * 7. I support feminism and believe both sexes are equal +1
 * I support some feminist talking points, but gender roles should be kept to a certain degree 0.5+
 * I support strict gender roles/oppose gender equality 0+
 * 8. Trans people should be allowed to change their gender and transition +1
 * Trans people should be allowed to transition, but I support transmedicalism 0.5+
 * There is no such thing as being trans and I oppose any sort of trans rights 0+
 * 9. I support interculturalism, and believe that cultures should engage in cross-cultural dialogue. +1
 * I support monoculturalism and believe that immigrants should have to assimilate//I support multiculturalism but with secure borders 0.5+
 * I support strict nativism/open borders 0+
 * 10. Freedom of speech and expression is necessary for any society +1
 * Some form of expression should be restricted like hate speech/obscenity 0.5+
 * Freedom of speech isn't necessary for a society 0+
 * 1. I support a Liberal Democracy +1
 * I support some of other form of governance that isn't anti-democratic 0.5+
 * I am anti-democratic (This includes anything that is an authoritarian "democracy" that doesn't allow free and fair elections) 0+
 * 2. Political parties should exist, but there should be reform that allows the inclusion of more political parties to compete in elections. +1
 * I am against political parties entirely +0.5
 * I support a one-party state/political parties have no obligation to serve the interest of their voter base
 * 3. While representatives should exist, the people should be allowed greater autonomy through polls/referendums, ect. As, representatives don't always have the best interest of the people at heart +1
 * Representatives are good enough/I support issues being directly voted on by the population +0.5
 * I am against political representatives entirely +0
 * 4. I support a secular state and believe that the government policies should be based on secularism +1
 * I support Laicism +0.5
 * I support some form of religious governance whether it be a religious democracy or theocracy/forced secularism +0
 * 5. I support populism. Specifically, left-wing populism +1
 * I am a populist without objectives +0.5
 * I am a neo-nationalist or against populism +0
 * 1. While bloc politics aren't perfect, I realize Western civilization has contributed more to the world compared to other civilizations, and will support western powers to counter the states of the east +1
 * Both the east and west are equally bad + 0.5
 * I am sympathetic to powers of the east such as China, Russia, or the former, and believe they are less destructive +0
 * 2. NATO as an alliance is necessary in the modern day +1
 * NATO should be disbanded and replaced with a collective security council +0.5
 * I am against NATO and any form of defensive alliance hard stop +0
 * 3. The European Union is in desperate need of reform if it wants to survive in the modern times, and I am a soft-eurosceptic +1
 * The European Union is good as is +0.5
 * I support leaving the EU/I support European Federalism +0
 * 4. I am a diplomatic internationalist, and believe we as a world need to collectively work together for the greater good of humanity +1
 * I am neither for or against international co-operation +0.5
 * I am a diplomatic isolationist +0
 * 5. I support fair-trade with low tariffs and easy way for investors to enter the country for economic development, and believe the world should work together in terms of economics +1
 * I support high tariffs, but not against economic co-operation with other countries +0.5
 * I am against economic co-operation with other countries and support autarky/free trade +0
 * 6. I am a cosmopolitan/non-chauvinist nationalist and am both a citizen of the world and my nation +1
 * I am a cosmopolitan and a citizen of the world +0.5
 * I am a citizen of my nation only +0
 * 7. I am for a non-interventionist foreign policy and believe we should almost never military intervene in other countries unless we have to for the sake of national security, genocide and humanitarian aid, ect. +1
 * I support a pacifist foreign policy but we still intervene in genocidal states and partake in humanitarian aid +0.5
 * My country shouldn't even intervene in the most genocidal states/I am a military intervening in other countries +0
 * 8. I support being a member of the United Nations, but the institutions themselves are in need of reform +1
 * The UN is good as it is now/We should involve ourselves less in the UN but not leave it/I don't care about the UN +0.5
 * The UN is a failed project and we should leave it/ The UN should be used to further integrate world governments +0
 * 9. I support military alliances overall and we should actively seek to create them with other countries +1
 * I'm not against military alliances but we shouldn't actively seek to create them unless we need to +0.5
 * I'm against military alliances +0
 * 10. The world should work together in terms of environmentalism to defeat climate change +1
 * I support environmentalism, but I'm neutral over environmental globalization +0.5
 * I'm against environmental globalization/I don't support the development of environmental technology/I support the destruction of the environment/Climate change doesn't exist +0

User Results

 * - 25/25
 * - 21.5/25
 * - 20.5/25
 * [[File:Tradpillf.png]] - 13.5/25

How I would've voted in elections
American Elections =

1700s
1789 - George Washington

1792 - Thomas Jefferson

1796 - Thomas Jefferson

1800s
1800 - Thomas Jefferson

1804 - Thomas Jefferson

1808 - James Madison

1812 - James Madison

1816 - James Monroe

1820 - James Monroe

1824 - Andrew Jackson

1828 - Andrew Jackson

1832 - Andrew Jackson

1836 - Martin Van Buren

1840 - Martin Van Buren

1844 - James K. Polk

1848 -  Martin Van Buren

1852 - John P. Hale

1856 - John C. Frémont

1860 - Abraham Lincoln

1864 - Abraham Lincoln

1868 - Ulysses S. Grant

1872 - Horace Greeley

1876 - Rutherford B. Hayes

1880 - James A. Garfield

1884 - James G. Blaine

1888 - Benjamin Harrison

1892 - James B. Weaver

1896 - William McKinley

1900s
1900 - Theodore Roosevelt

1904 - Theodore Roosevelt

1908 - William Howard Taft

1912 - William Howard Taft

1916 - Charles Evans Hughes

1920 - James M. Cox

1924 - Calvin Coolidge

1928 - Herbert Hoover

1932 - Herbert Hoover

1936 - Franklin D. Roosevelt

1940 - Franklin D. Roosevelt

1944 - Franklin D. Roosevelt

1948 - Harry Truman

1952 - Adlai Stevenson

1956 - Adlai Stevenson

1960 - John F. Kennedy

1964 - Lyndon B. Johnson

1968 - Hubert Humphrey

1972 - George McGovern

1976 - Jimmy Carter

1980 - Jimmy Carter

1984 - Walter Mondale

1988 - Michael Dukakis

1992 - Bill Clinton

1996 - Bill Clinton

2000s
2000: Al Gore

2004: John Kerry

2008: Barrack Obama

2012: Barrack Obama

2016: Bernie Sanders (No one)

2020: Bernie Sanders ( Joe Biden) German Elections =

1800s
1871 - - LGGWA 1874 - - SAPD 1877 - - SAPD 1878 - - SAPD 1881 - - SAPD 1884 - - SAPD 1887 - - SAPD 1890 - - SPD 1893 - - SPD 1898 - - SPD

1900s
1901 - - SPD 1907 - - SPD 1912 - - SPD 1919 - - SDP 1920 - - SDP 1924 (May) - - SDP 1924 (December) - -  SDP 1928 - - SPD 1930 - - SPD 1932 (July) - - SPD 1932 (November) - - SPD 1933 (March) - - SPD 1947 - - SPD 1953 - - SPD 1957 - - SPD 1961 - - SPD 1965 - - SPD 1969 - - SPD 1972 - - SPD 1976 - - SPD 1980 - - SPD 1983 - - SPD 1987 - - SPD 1990 - - SPD 1994 - - SPD 1998 - - SPD

2000s
2002 - - SPD 2005 - - SPD 2007 - - SPD 2009 - - SPD 2013 - - SPD 2017 - - SPD 2021 - - SPD

Things I like
My favorite youtube channels =

[[File:YouTube.png]] Political Youtube channels [[File:YouTube.png]]

 * [[File:Soc-h.png]] Shaun


 * [[File:Socdem.png]] Shoe0nHead


 * [[File:Kraut.png]] Kraut


 * [[File:Thar.png]] Three Arrows


 * [[File:Fem.png]] Knowing Better


 * [[File:Antcent.png]] JrEg


 * [[File:World.png]] CaspianReport

[[File:YouTube.png]] Non-political Youtube channels [[File:YouTube.png]]

 * [[File:CGP_Grey.png]] CGP Grey


 * [[File:Eastoryball.png]] Eastory


 * [[File:CodyFrank.png]] AlternateHistoryHub


 * [[File:ArmchairHistoryBall.png]] The Armchair Historian


 * [[File:Cball-Russia.png]] NFKRZ


 * [[File:ISPball.png]] iSorrowproductions


 * [[File:Gamer.png]] Mountain General


 * [[File:Gamer.png]] Alex The Rambler!


 * [[File:Histval.png]] History Matters


 * [[File:Cball-Austria.png]] Tapakapa

Favorite Hoi4 Mods =
 * [[File:Histval.png]] Countryballs Explained

Favorite Hoi4 Mods

 * [[File:World.png]] Toolpack


 * [[File:Burgsys_icon.png]] The New Order: Last Days of Europe


 * [[File:Necon.png]] Cold War Iron Curtain: A World Divided


 * [[File:Avant-garde.png]] Red Flood


 * [[File:World.png]] Random Country Placement


 * [[File:World.png]] Novum Vexillum


 * [[File:Cball-GermanEmpire.png]] Kaiserredux


 * [[File:World.png]] Player-Led Peace Conferences


 * [[File:Nazi.png]] Thousand Week Reich

Rating Cities
City Relations =

Good

 * [[File:Cball-US.png]] Kansas City, Missouri - I've lived here the majority of my life, and while I do go in and out of the city often, I will still always cherish this city.
 * [[File:Cball-US.png]] St. Joseph, Missouri - I have family here, so I visit this city often. The city in of itself is bust however, as there's not a lot of activities to do here, and has a notable amount of homeless and gun violence from what I've seen. But, I've never had a notably bad experience from visiting this city. So, despite all of that, because I go here often, it gets put here.
 * [[File:Cball-US.png]] Lee's Summit, Missouri - I have had notably good experiences visiting here, as I can recall several of them.
 * [[File:Cball-US.png]] St. Louis, Missouri - Had a really fun time going on the arch. However, the city itself is in pretty dire shape from what I've seen, with having one of the highest crimes rates in the city. The city itself is pretty crud, but I did have a good experience going here where I went.
 * [[File:Cball-US.png]] San Francisco, California - Despite everything that goes on in California and this city, it was a pretty fun experience from what I had visiting it, and I would definitely go again.

Meh

 * [[File:Cball-US.png]] Denver, Colorado - I've been here several times, but it was never really interesting or boring, can't really recall a whole lot from the trips I've been to going to this city.
 * [[File:Cball-US.png]] Independence, Missouri - Nothing of note worthy ever happened here. But, I did visit it, so that's something, I guess. I would say it was ok.

Bad
Cities I would like to do go =
 * [[File:Cball-US.png]] Platte City, Missouri - One of my family members got mugged here lmao. While nothing of value was stolen (I think it was just like 50$ I dunno), that experience just ruined it entirely for me.

Europe

 * [[File:Cball-Russia.png]] Moscow, Russia
 * [[File:Cball-Russia.png]] Saint Petersburg, Russia
 * [[File:Cball-UK.png]] London, Britain
 * [[File:Cball-France.png]] Paris, France

Asia

 * [[File:Cball-Japan.png]] Tokyo, Japan
 * [[File:Cball-China.png]] Beijing, China
 * [[File:Cball-China.png]] Shanghai, China
 * [[File:Cball-China.png]] Hong Kong, China
 * [[File:Cball-Taiwan.png]] Taipei, Taiwan

Americas

 * [[File:Cball-Canada.png]] Toronto, Canada
 * [[File:Cball-Canada.png]] Vancouver, Canada
 * [[File:Cball-US.png]] New York, United States

Political Parties & Countries
Parties I would vote for =

[[File:Cball-US.png]] United States
Democratic Party
 * [[File:Socdem.png]] Congressional Progressive Caucus

[[File:Cball-Germany.png]] Germany
SPD

[[File:Polandball.png]] Poland
Lewica

[[File:Cball-Hungary.png]] Hungary
Magyar Szocialista Párt

[[File:Cball-France.png]] France
Parti socialiste

[[File:Cball-Japan.png]] Japan
Constitutional Democratic Party of Japan
 * [[File:Socdem.png]] Social Democratic Party

[[File:Cball-Sweden.png]] Sweden
Sveriges Socialdemokratiska Arbetareparti

[[File:Cball-Taiwan.png]] Republic of China
Pan-Green Coalition

[[File:Cball-UK.png]] United Kingdom
Labour Party
 * [[File:Socdem.png]] Soft Left

[[File:Cball-Kazakhstan.png]] Kazakhstan
Democratic Choice of Kazakhstan

[[File:Cball-Norway.png]] Norway
Arbeidarpartiet

[[File:Cball-Finland.png]] Finland
Suomen sosialidemokraattinen puolue

[[File:Cball-North_Korea.png]] North Korea
Free Joseon

[[File:Castro.png]] Cuba
Social Democratic Co-ordination of Cuba

[[File:Cball-South_Korea.png]] South Korea
Justice Party

[[File:Cball-HongKong.png]] Hong Kong
Pro-Democracy Camp
 * [[File:Socdem.png]] League of Social Democrats

[[File:Cball-China.png]] People's Republic of China
Democracy Party of China

[[File:Cball-Canada.png]] Canada
New Democratic Party

[[File:Cball-Russia.png]] Russia
Russia of the Future

[[File:Cball-Belarus.png]] Belarus
Anti-Lukashenko Parties Countries in need of change =
 * [[File:Socdem.png]] Belarusian Social Democratic Party

Based countries, little to no changes necessary

 * [[File:Cball-Denmark.png]] Denmark
 * [[File:Cball-Sweden.png]] Sweden
 * [[File:Cball-Norway.png]] Norway
 * [[File:Cball-Iceland.png]] Iceland
 * [[File:Cball-Finland.png]] Finland
 * [[File:Cball-Switzerland.png]] Switzerland
 * [[File:Cball-Austria.png]] Austria
 * [[File:Cball-Germany.png]] Germany
 * [[File:Cball-Netherlands.png]] Netherlands
 * [[File:Cball-Canada.png]] Canada
 * [[File:Cball-Belgium.png]] Belgium
 * [[File:Cball-Czechia.png]] Czechia
 * [[File:Cball-Ireland.png]] Ireland

Good, in need of a few tweaks

 * [[File:Cball-Newz.png]] New Zealand
 * [[File:Cball-Uruguay.png]] Uruguay
 * [[File:Cball-Australia.png]] Australia
 * [[File:Cball-France.png]] France
 * [[File:Cball-Spain.png]] Spain
 * [[File:Cball-Taiwan.png]] Taiwan

Ok, but in need of reform

 * [[File:Cball-US.png]] United States
 * [[File:Cball-Chile.png]] Chile
 * [[File:Cball-UK.png]] United Kingdom

Meh, in need of noticeable reform

 * [[File:Cball-Japan.png]] Japan
 * [[File:Cball-South_Korea.png]] South Korea
 * [[File:Cball-Ukraine.png]] Ukraine

Bad, in need of a peaceful revolution or massive reform

 * [[File:Cball-Poland.png]] Poland
 * [[File:Cball-Hungary.png]] Hungary
 * [[File:Cball-Italy.png]] Italy
 * [[File:Cball-Singapore.png]] Singapore
 * [[File:Cball-Brazil.png]] Brazil

Terrible, burn the entire system to the ground and start from new

 * [[File:Cball-Russia.png]] Russia
 * [[File:Cball-North_Korea.png]] North Korea
 * [[File:Zio.png]] Israel
 * [[File:Cball-Palestine.png]] Palestine
 * [[File:Cball-Iran.png]] Iran
 * [[File:Cball-Belarus.png]] Belarus
 * [[File:Cball-China.png]] People's Republic of China
 * [[File:Cball-Taliban.png]] Afghanistan
 * [[File:Castro.png]] Cuba
 * [[File:Cball-Saudi.png]] Saudi Arabia
 * [[File:Chavismo.png]] Venezuela
 * [[File:Cball-Kazakhstan.png]] Kazakhstan
 * [[File:Cball-AfricanUnion.png]] A lot of Africa
 * [[File:Thailand.png]] Thailand
 * [[File:Cball-Turkmenistan.png]] Turkmenistan
 * [[File:Cball-Ethiopia.png]] Ethiopia
 * [[File:Cball-Somalia.png]] Somalia
 * [[File:Cball-Egypt.png]] Egypt
 * [[File:Cball-Myanmar.png]] Myammar

Positive

 * [[File:USA_PirateParty.png]] United States Pirate Party - Absolutely based, and chad. Like, how is it even this possible to each this level of based?


 * [[File:ForwardParty.png]] American Forward Party - Well I may have disagreements, I still respect you as a political party. Yang is kinda meh however.

Neutral

 * [[File:Demcr.png]] Democratic Party - I seriously cannot believe I have to work with this party. The only tolerable faction within this party is the progressive caucus. All other wings are moderately to severely cringe. With having most of the criticisms I have for the republican party.
 * [[File:GreensUS.png]] Green Party USA - I honestly don't know much about your party or its members, but you seem to be slightly more tolerable. Although, full out socialism is not desirable, and your social policies are too far.

Negative

 * [[File:RepubUS.png]] Republican Party - Fuck off, just because I hate the establishment doesn't mean I like you. You are my anti-thesis. Corporate welfare, ever increasing statism with disregard for civil liberties, foreign interventionism, isolationism, and free-market capitalism. Everything, and I mean EVERYTHING, is just awful.
 * [[File:USASolidarity.png]] American Solidarity Party - Not even your redeemable economics make up your absolutely horrid polices. I would probably vote for this if I was a social conservative, but I'm not.
 * [[File:USLibertarians.png]] Libertarian Party
 * [[File:Dsa.png]] Democratic Socialists of America - This party is filled to the brim with Anti-American tankies. And, I'm not even advocating for socialism to begin with.
 * [[File:Fuente.png]] America First - Nick Fuentes is a Neo-Nazi.
 * [[File:Rockwell.png]] American Nazi Party - Neo-Nazis are absolute clowns.
 * [[File:Constitution_Party_(US).png]] Constitution Party - Party filled to the brim with far-right zealots. Not to mention, everything they stand for is absolutely barf and cringe.

How to Draw
MyFlagUpdatedMatt.png
 * 1) Draw a ball.
 * 2) Fill the backround with blue.
 * 3) Draw a red cross with white outlines.
 * 4) Draw a red circle in the middle.
 * 5) Draw a rose in the middle of the red circle.
 * 6) Draw the eyes.

You're done!

Ideological Relations
Ideological Relations=

Based

 * [[File:Socdem.png]] Social Democracy - My ideology, fairly self explanatory, yeah?


 * [[File:LibSocDemIcon.png]] Libertarian Social Democracy - My more focused on civil liberties self. While I do admire your passion for freedom, there needs to be a sensible amount of freedom, still based non-the-less.


 * [[File:Civlibert.png]] Civil Libertarianism - The right to privacy, speech, and bodily autonomy are all important values for society. Without you, society would be nothing.


 * [[File:Progress.png]] Progressivism - Based, nuff said. However, a lot of you guys could buy less into intersectional idpol, as it doesn't help anyone.


 * [[File:Patern.png]] - It should be the job of the state to guide the people, and to provide for them.


 * [[File:Nordmodel.png]] Nordic Model - Based and nordicpilled. You got me into politics, so thanks for that. (Would be better if you dropped the monarchism though)


 * [[File:Indiv.png]] Individualism - Individual rights and liberties are based. I should be able to control my own body without outside forces telling me otherwise.


 * [[File:Hedonism-cloud.png]] Mh:polcompballanarchy:Hedonism - The ideal way live ones life. Live your life how you want to, and don't let anyone tell you otherwise.


 * [[File:Liberal_Democracy.png]] Liberal Democracy - Not bad in theory, but gets corrupted by corporate interest and cronyism. There's a lot of improvements we can make to this.


 * [[File:Atlanticism.png]] Atlanticism - The United States has contributed more to the world than any other country, and I will support them in their fight against authoritarian states.


 * [[File:Pac.png]] Mh:polcompballanarchy:Pacifism - No more shall we waste billions of dollars in pointless interventions.


 * [[File:Socgeo.png]] Social Georgism - Collective ownership of land is very based.


 * [[File:Fem.png]] Feminism & [[File:Menslib.png]] Men's Liberation - Gender equality is based.


 * [[File:Thar.png]] Anti-Authoritarianism - DOWN WITH THE NEOLBIERAL STATUS QUO, DOWN WITH FASCISM, DOWN WITH REACTIONARISM!


 * [[File:Humanismpix.png]] Humanism - You carry my ideas nicely.


 * [[File:Protect.png]] Protectionism - Outsourcing all of our jobs to developing countries has been disastrous on the US economy.


 * [[File:Globnat.png]] Alter-Globalization - International solidarity with every country without the shitty effects of globalization? What can I say but based?


 * [[File:Cosmo.png]] Cosmopolitanism - Were you come from shouldn't matter, what matters is if we can get along.


 * [[File:Modnat.png]] Patriotism - Taking pride in everything your country has done without putting yourself above other countries is hella based. USA, USA, USA!


 * [[File:Civnat.png]] Civic Nationalism - I love the west.


 * [[File:Natprog.png]] National Progressivism - Basically me, just tone the former down to patriotism.


 * [[File:Internation.png]] Internationalism - Working together with other countries is based!


 * [[File:Social_corpratism.png]] Social Corporatism - Hello, based department?


 * [[File:NatProg.png]] Bull Moose Progressivism - Based trust-buster, but why'd you have to do so much imperialism?


 * [[File:Atheism.png]] Anglo-Secularism - Separation of church and state ftw.


 * [[File:Reform.png]] Reformism - The best way to achieve political change in the case of liberal democracy.


 * [[File:Intercult.png]] Interculturalism - Pretty based, we need unity for our country. But, I am less concerned with protecting our cultural heritage from immigrants more than I just want unity between them, they shouldn't have to abandon their other cultures, just learn our language and ect.


 * [[File:Leftpop-0.png]] Left-Wing Populism - POWER TO THE PEOPLE!


 * [[File:Dem.png]] Democracy - The LEAST worst system created, besides from all the others we've tried.


 * [[File:Soclib.png]] Social Liberalism - I was apolitically you, but I've moved somewhat left from you, still think your pretty based, and the best form of liberalism.


 * [[File:Statecap.png]] State Capitalism - State owned enterprise makes it a lot easier to do business.


 * [[File:Marketsoc.png]] Market Socialism - One of the best, and reality more practical socialists, he realizes the importance of markets.


 * [[File:Soccap.png]] Social Capitalism - Human centered capitalism? Based.


 * [[File:Regulationism.png]] Regulationism - Necessary so capitalism doesn't destroy the environment or become unethical.


 * [[File:Utility.png]] Mh:polcompball:Utilitarianism - The most accurate way to measure the happiness of a society.


 * [[File:Gay.png]] LGBT - The LGBT community are people like the rest of us and should be afforded the same rights as everyone else.

Kinda Based

 * [[File:Cap.png]] Capitalism - Capitalism is a good system but needs regulation and state intervention to ensure that it stays fair and doesn't become unethical


 * [[File:Socliber.png]] Social Libertarianism - Most tolerable libertarian.


 * [[File:Bhl.png]] Bleeding-Heart Libertarianism - One of the best libertarians, combine the social views of social libertarianism with this, and that would be me, but libertarian.


 * [[File:Ego.png]] Egoism - I should be the controller of my own body and life choices from all governing authorities, but disregarding morality entirely is cringe for me.


 * [[File:Laicism.png]] Laicism - While the church and state should be separate, you are too authoritarian for me. Better than having no separation of church and state at all, but still.


 * [[File:Clib.png]] Classical Liberalism - Without you, my ideology would've never come to existence. But, you're quite antiquated in the modern day. But, without the enlightenment, none of this would've been possible.


 * [[File:Libsoc.png]] Libertarian Socialism - You're quite interesting, and I like your model of governance. But, socialism still isn't desirable to implement. But, you have to be one of the best anti-statist ideologies. I would prefer to live under this than a right-libertarian society. However, please rely less on planning and more on markets. And, stop being so revolutionary please.


 * [[File:Transh.png]] Transhumanism - Based, but chill out on replacing people's body parts and stuff like that. Be more moderate, and you would basically be perfect.


 * [[File:Pan-Nationalism.png]] Pan-Nationalism - Culturally similar countries only have everything to gain by working together. But, some of your supporters are cringe. Be less ethnocentric please, and you would be very much based.


 * [[File:Corptism.png]] Corporatism - You're a good mode of production, but should focus on getting more welfarist...


 * [[File:Orlib.png]] Ordo-Liberalism - You're pretty okay, I'll give you that, the German market economy was based.


 * [[File:Georgist.png]] Georgism - I love free cats, and LVT as well. Although, free-trade is kinda cringe and LVT shouldn't be the only tax. Still has good ideas.


 * [[File:Leftnat.png]] Left-Wing Nationalism - Look, I admire your self-determination stances for countries fighting against Imperialism, but I'm more lax than you in a lot of ways.

Neutral

 * [[File:Soc.png]] Socialism - I draw a lot from you and am often accused of being you by uneducated morons, but you go too far. Free-market capitalism is bad, but you're no better in reality.


 * [[File:Dsa.png]] Democratic Socialism - Meh ideology, useful allies. You may vote for Bernie, but capitalism should ultimately stay. Even if I'm not opposed to you, I still think that socialism is quite the stretch.


 * [[File:Multicult.png]] Multiculturalism - While you may be better than ethnic or racial nationalism, there needs to be a shared sense of culture to maintain a social democratic state, and its welfare policies. And you tend to focus on segregate people more than uniting them.


 * [[File:European_Federalism.png]] European Union - The European Union has been the most successful economic union and has brought Europe to be united. But, could use some obvious reforms in some regards, namely being countering the neoliberalism and reforming its institutions.


 * [[File:3way.png]] Third Way - Your economics go against the idea of a social democracy and military intervention is cringe and imperialist. Can you stop bombing countries in the middle east for one fucking minute? You make my ideology look like a complete joke.


 * [[File:Socauth.png]] Social Authoritarianism - Borderline social fascism, if you lean progressive then you get put here, if you lean conservative you get put in cringe. Not to mention, how a lot of the leaders just flat out suck, and have next to no redeeming qualities.


 * [[File:World_Federalism2.png]] World Federalism - Your intentions are good, but I'm not sure how practical this actually is and the problems with this ideology wouldn't even stop after it is achieved, but still good intentions none the less. Also, a lot of you guys are just blatant neoliberals.


 * [[File:Long.png]] Longism - Every man a king, every man a king! But you're like Bernie Sanders on steroids... Chill out with the authoritarianism and corruption will you?


 * [[File:Kemal.png]] Kemalism - Modernizing turkey and getting rid of the old ottoman crap was based, but treating ethnic and religious minorities like shit and the other stuff you did wasn't.


 * [[File:Patcon.png]] Paternalistic Conservatism - My more conservative self. If he wasn't conservative he'd be pretty good.


 * [[File:Hcon.png]] LGBT Conservatism [[File:Homocon.png]] - A complete contradiction, being progressive in one area isn't going to make me like you.


 * [[File:Glibr.png]] Green Libertarianism - Libertarianism is really cringe, but environmentalism is mega based. But, a free-market capitalist society would ultimately favor the economy over the environment.


 * [[File:Demcon.png]] Democratic Confederalism - Kurdistan should be a free country, but this as an ideology is uhh.. not that great.


 * [[File:Monkeyzz-Enlightenment.png]] Enlightenment - While you were necessary for my ideology to come into existence, your modernist myths are just really cringe.


 * [[File:Ford.png]] Fordism - Unironically, not the worst Dystopian ideology. wait this is a dystopia?


 * [[File:Pinkcap.png]] Pink Capitalism - While I hate the empty progressiveness of this ideology, you make old leftoids shit themselves, which is super based.


 * [[File:Cdem.png]] Christian Democracy - Your economics are the only thing that keep you from being put in the cringe category. Any government that bases its beliefs off of religious ones are cringe, along with being too soft on religious extremism. And sometimes actually panders it on the mask of being a "moderate".


 * [[File:Islamic_Democracy.png]] Islamic Democracy - Same as above. Has been forces for both good and bad. Also, keep your traditions to yourself.

Cringe

 * [[File:Conserv.png]] Conservatism - You have never conserved anything of worth, and never will.


 * [[File:Fiscon.png]] Fiscal Conservatism - The only thing you conserve are the wealth of the exploitive elite. I get some fiscal responsibility is needed, but come on now. Welfare states are based.


 * [[File:RepubUS.png]] Republican Party - Party for the rich. You don't even pretend to care about the working class.


 * [[File:Demcr.png]] Democratic Party - You may be slightly better than the afore mentioned party above you, but you also don't care about the working class either.


 * [[File:Confem.png]] Conservative Feminism - How can you claim to care about women rights?


 * [[File:Rpop-tinfoilhat.png]] Right-Wing Populism - Climate denial, racism, xenophobia, and conspiracy theories are very cringe.


 * [[File:WelfChauvin.png]] Welfare Chauvinism - Why only give welfare to one group of people??? I think this is what tankies meant by social fascism.


 * [[File:Consocf.png]] Conservative Socialism - You say progressivism and capitalism bread degeneracy, like I actually retrospectively care. Also, dictators are in-general bad.


 * [[File:Neoliberal-icon.png]] Neoliberalism - The bane and cause of all suffering within the modern world. Oppressing the global poor, trickle down economics, poverty, imperialism, ect. There's hardly any redeeming features of this ideology. Fuck you.


 * [[File:Necon.png]] Neoconservatism - The cause of a lot of suffering in developing countries and home abroad. Eroding civil liberties, pretty much legal terrorism, and much more. Your idea of spreading democracy is overthrowing democratically elected presidents and replacing them with brutal dictators? This is truly a despicable ideology.


 * [[File:Libertarian.png]] Libertarianism - Embracing all the bad parts about capitalism that would lead to a system where corporations take control over everyone's lives with little to no regulation to stop it? What can I say, other than really cringe, not to mention a lot of you guys are just republicans who want to smoke weed.


 * [[File:Community.png]] Communitarianism - I may be an economic collectivist, but opposing individualism and thinking that community is the best way to measure happiness is just dumb.


 * [[File:Corp.png]] Corporatocracy - This is what unregulated capitalism leads too.


 * [[File:World.png]] Globalism - International co-operation may be necessary for the betterment of mankind, but you're more often than not a pawn of neoliberals. Also, exploiting the global poor is just vomit worthy.


 * [[File:Paleolib.png]] Paleolibertarianism - How exactly do you expect a socially conservative society to maintain itself without strong government interference?


 * [[File:Conlib.png]] Conservative Liberalism - Classical liberal, my ass.


 * [[File:Libfem.png]] Liberal Feminism - How are war crimes any different if women are committing them?


 * [[File:Minarchist.png]] Minarchism - Why.


 * [[File:Confess.png]] Confessionalism - Seperate the church and state.


 * [[File:Ormarxf.png]] Marxism - We may agree on some things, but communism has still shown to ultimately fail each time it has been tried.


 * [[File:Isolationist.png]] Isolationism - Based military policy, but completely isolating yourself from world affairs is cringe.


 * [[File:Cultural_Nationalism.png]] Cultural Nationalism - I may support integrating immigrants, but you are just hateful towards those who aren't in your culture, and more often than, not racist as well.


 * [[File:Altl.png]] Alt-Lite - Not as bad as his racist counterpart, and atleast this movement provided a less destructive path compared to the Alt-Right. But still not good. Chud is still a chud.


 * [[File:Ultraprogressivism.png]] Revolutionary Progressivism - You make most progressives who are sane people look bad and give material for conservatives to strawman us with. Is tradition in of itself meaningless? Yes. Should we launch a new cultural revolution? No.


 * [[File:Trad.png]] Traditionalism - "oH ReTurN To TrAdItIoN, ReJeCt DeGeNeRaCy, mY LiTtLe DaRk AgE1!1!1!" Lmao, how about no. How about you do something better with your life than making dumb "based and trad little dark age" edits on Youtube?


 * [[File:Awaj.png]] Anarchism - Unless there is something that stands out about one of your variants, you get put here.

Really Cringe

 * [[File:Fash.png]] Fascism - You realize, being edgy isn't a political persona. Right?


 * [[File:Cfash.png]] Clerical Fascism - God this just gave me an even bigger brain hemorrhage, with the addition with your retarded made up fairytale as an excuse to commit horrific crimes against humanity, you are truly evil.


 * [[File:Esofash.png]] Esoteric Fascism - This is just flat out larp, if I've ever seen one.


 * [[File:Nazi.png]] National Socialism - The nazis lost. Neck yourself, and cry about it.


 * [[File:Eugen.png]] Eugenicism & [[File:Darwinist.png]] Social Darwinism - Retarded neo-nazi ideology.


 * [[File:Marxlen.png]] Marxist Leninism - You tankies have the audacity to call us fascists when your ideology has killed millions, and your praxis is denying genocide and mass starvation. The average worker doesn't need an elitist vanguard party controlling every aspect of their life.


 * [[File:Austrobert.png]] Austrolibertarianism - A society without any taxation or regulations at all is one that wouldn't objectively work.


 * [[File:Plcn2.png]] Paleoconservatism - America isn't a Christian nation, god doesn't exist, and society will secularize whether you like it or not. Not even your anti-interventionist stances make you good, as many of your adherents are flat out Neo-nazis, with the base ideology itself just being flat out retarded.


 * [[File:Reactcross.png]] Reactionarism - You are a poison in this world, and every single world government must take a hard stance on actively combatting you. Change is inevitable whether you like it or not.


 * [[File:ReactPix.png]] Reactionary Modernism - You are a walking contradiction, and do not exist.


 * [[File:Christy.png]] [[File:JewTheo.png]] [[File:Muslim 2.png]] [[File:Hind.png]] [[File:Bud.png]] Theocracies - Why should your fictional book get to tell me what to do if I don't want to do it?


 * [[File:RelNat.png]] Religious Nationalism - Read above. We do not need such mindless divisions like this fracturing the unity of our country.


 * [[File:Ethplur.png]] Ethnopluralism - I have never seen any promoters of you that haven't been white nationalists or crypto-fascists.


 * [[File:Ethnonat.png]] Ethnic Nationalism - Ethnic cleansing, racism, and xenophobia are very cringe.


 * [[File:AnEn.png]] Anti-Environmentalism - You have caused millions of deaths, and many more to come. You are the biggest threat in the West, and your influence needs to be actively countered.


 * [[File:Neolud.png]] Neoluddism - I care for the environment, which is why I oppose you. At least you don't deny basic science, but still, really horrible.


 * [[File:Imp.png]] Imperialism - Not even remotely acceptable in the modern day, disgusting ideology. Denying the rights of native populations just to subjugate them into your Empire is deplorable.


 * [[File:Ethno.png]] Ethnocracy & [[File:Racenat.png]] Racial Nationalism - This is just funny because of how sad it is, shouldn't even have to explain why.


 * [[File:Ancapf.png]] Anarcho-Capitalism - All of your followers are terminally ill 13 year olds who just discovered politics lmao.


 * [[File:Authoritarian_Conservatism.png]] Authoritarian Conservatism - The actual moderate wing of fascism.


 * [[File:Totalitarian.png]] Totalitarianism - There is nothing outside of your brain.


 * [[File:Ingsocf.png]] Ingsoc - This is literally 1984.

Regional Ideology Relations =
 * [[File:Monarch.png]] Monarchism - Monarchism in all of its forms in inferior to that of republicanism, and the fact you still exist in the modern day is baffling.

Positive

 * [[File:Nordmodel.png]] Nordic Model -
 * [[File:Native.png]] Indigenism -
 * [[File:Orlib.png]] Ordo-Liberalism -
 * [[File:NatProg.png]] Bull Moose Progressivism -
 * [[File:Dubcekism.png]] Socialism with a Human Face -

Neutral

 * [[File:Kemal.png]] Kemalism -
 * [[File:Long.png]] Longism -
 * [[File:Athdem.png]] Athenian Democracy -
 * [[File:European_Federalism.png]] European Federalism -
 * [[File:Tito.png]] Titoism -
 * [[File:Rockrep.png]] Rockefeller Republicanism -

Negative

 * [[File:Absoc.png]] Arab Socialism - Ah yes, replace the colonizers with brutal dictatorships. You may have been better than the colonizers, but you were still bound to fail.
 * [[File:Antijap.png]] Anti-Japaneseism - Imagine for a minute, you make your entire ideology just about ethnic self hatred.
 * [[File:Baath.png]] Ba'athism - Average resistoid larper who goes "resist westoid imperialism" when they actually have to live in these "anti-imperialist regimes" and how shit they actually are. Fuck Assad.
 * [[File:Gaddafi.png]] Gaddafism - Even your achievements are vastly undermined by your corruption, authoritarianism, and conservatism. And, was a brutal rapist that caused the Libyan civil war to happen to begin with, you will not be missed. Rip, bozo. And, third international theory? More like, third intershit theory, hehe I'm so clever and funny. But, seriously, your international theory is nonsense and complete garbage.
 * [[File:Chavismo.png]] Chavismo - You started this whole mess, are you noticing a pattern here with these dictators that are so called "anti-imperialists", and just how shit their regimes are to live in?
 * [[File:Guevara.png]] Guevarism - Why do progressives look up to you? You were a horrible dictator whose achieves are overpraised to make up for the many shortcomings you had. Along with being racist and homophobic, there's literally nothing good about you.
 * [[File:Castro.png]] Castroism - Despite of what I think of the blockade, I hope your regime collapses. Death to the Cuban to government, freedom to the Cuban people, and solidarity with the Cuban protestors.
 * [[File:Trumpism.png]] Trumpism - Horrible president, failed to accomplish a whole lot while only further dividing the country with his rhetoric. Next to no saving graces about your ideology.
 * [[File:Zio.png]] Zionism - I may not support Palestine, But I do not support giving our money to prop up the Israeli government. Not opposed to you existing, but lay off the Arabs so much, and be less brutal.
 * [[File:Onenatcon.png]] One-Nation Conservatism -

Very Negative
Anti-Ideology Relations =
 * [[File:Dengf.png]] Dengism - Anyone who defends you should be ashamed of themselves. You're a totalitarian and genocidal state that should be actively countered. I would compare you to the Nazi's, but I will give the Nazi's credit were it is due. At least Nazi Germany actually gave a shit about their environment.
 * [[File:Stalin.png]] Stalinism - Bloodthirsty maniac who defeated the nazis just to use the same means the nazi's used against the Jews directly onto the Jews again. And, a pedo as well.
 * [[File:Juche.png]] Juche - Korean INGSOC.
 * [[File:Burmasoc.png]] Burmese Way to Socialism -
 * [[File:Khom.png]] Khomeinism -
 * [[File:SL.png]] Silver Legionism - I oppose everything here lol. Also, not to mention the fashie larp.
 * [[File:Jihad.png]] Jihadism - I don't have to explain why terrorism is wrong, now do I?
 * [[File:Polpot.png]] Pol Potism -

Positive
Anti-Authoritarianism - Reject totalitarian dictatorships, embrace freedom and democracy.

Anti-Imperialism - Empires are evil, and shouldn't exist.

Anti-Third Worldism - Their civilizations are backwards compared to the West, and I am not afraid to say that. Nor do I want to live under their hegemony.

Anti-Dengism - I would support the complete and utter destruction of the CCP and Chinese hegemony by Western powers.

Anti-Putinism - The day the West destroys Russian Hegemony is the day world peace can finally be achieved.

Anti-Anarchism - Authority sucks, but there still needs to be a state. But, not in the totalitarian way obviously, because many people who say they are anti-anarchist are usually pro-authority as well and more often than not totalitarian.

Anti-Racism - Racism is a modern day evil that has no place in society.

Anti-Monarchism - What retard is unironically endorsing monarchy as a form of government in the 21st century?

Anti-Easternism - I will whole heartedly support the United States in destroying the Imperial powers of the East, as they are a threat to world peace at large.

Anti-Idpol - Identity politics in general are preachy, tribalistic, and only further submit our differences instead of uniting us. Which, is determinantal to US politics as a whole.

Anti-Romanticism - Romanticizing times that have long since come and forms of rationality that have long since past is dumb. Also, the majority of you guys are reactionary weirdos as well.

Anti-Clericalism - Church authority should decline in the daily lives of citizens. However, I oppose doing that through authoritarian means.

Anti-Communism - Communism has failed each time.

Anti-Fascism - Fascism as a political ideology has been reduced to being practiced by terminally online 14 year olds who just discovered politics.

Anti-Nazism - Yeah, I don't think I have to explain this one.

Anti-Austerity - Austerity measures has been a disaster for the public as a whole.

Anti-Prolife - Abortion isn't murder, simple as.

Anti-Old Leftism - The old left are a bunch of wannabe revolutionaries who call anything they don't like shitlibs while their only praxis from what I've seen is being terminally online, and endorsing anything that goes against western hegemony, like: China, Russia, Hungary, Belarus, ect.

Anti-Conservatism - Traditions ultimately stem from the past, and thus, are not to be held sacred.

Anti-Colonialism - Colonialism is an evil that must be fought against.

Anti-Isolationism - Isolationism fails each time, and alliances are the best way to guarantee our national sovereignty and prevent war

Anti-Zionism - Israel has shown time and time again to take advantage of us and our allies, I'm not opposed to Israel existing as a state, but I am opposed to giving them any further aid in their conquest of Imperialist ambitions

Anti-Xenophobia - Why should people be treated differently based on where they come from?

Mixed
Anti-Capitalism - While free market capitalism is bad, endorsing anti-capitalism is too far for me.

Euroscepticism - Depends if you're opening to reforming the European Union, or for outright leaving it.

Anti-Globalism - Depends if you're talking about international co-operation or trade.

Anti-Socialism - I don't think socialism is feasible to fully implement either, but you need to chill out with being against any form of welfare or government intervention in the economy.

Anti-Nationalism - You can like your country and still be an internationalist and cosmopolitian, y'know? Even if you do have a point.

Anti-Multiculturalism - I oppose multicultural from a progressive standpoint as diversity for the sake of diversity is dumb and only tolerates unprogressive cultures, but many of you guys who oppose multiculturalism are legitimately bigoted people who are racist, xenophobic, and anti-immigration.

Negative
Anti-Wokeism - You are literally just used to strawman any progressive talking point, shut the fuck up. Literally just another way of saying anti-progressive without saying anti-progressive.

Anti-Feminism - Feminism is still needed in society. And besides, many of you guys just are just blatant misogynists who hate women.

Anti-Porn - It's funny, the same arguments I find against porn usage are the same fear mongering one that were repeated about violent video games, and other things related to that. I'm not going to ashamed for something that is human nature, and you can't convince me otherwise.

Anti-Abortionism - Why would you want to label yourself as being pro-forced birth and anti-women's rights?

Anti-Progressivism - REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!!!!!

Anti-Liberalism - REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!!!!!

Anti-Individualism - Individuality is still needed within society, even if I call for economic collectivism, I'm still a cultural individualist.

Anti-Westernism - Coping over western hegemony being based and the hegemony of the east not Self-Insert Relations= (Note: This is purely ideological, unless you're a massive dick/larper)

Good

 * [[File:Kirblyism-Icon.png]] Kirbly ([[File:Socgeo.png]]/[[File:Transh.png]])- Very based progressivism. Not sure about this whole world federalism and transhumanism thing though. But I can admire your futuristic world-view, even if it is far-fetched. You're pretty based.


 * [[File:Ninjack.png]] Ninjack-Aus ([[File:Libms.png]]/[[File:World_Federalism2.png]]) - You have pretty good cultural views, and good economics. although military intervention is cringe. You seem like a good person


 * [[File:Mebrouk.png]] Mebrouk ([[File:Socdem.png]]/[[File:Islamic_Liberalism.png]]) - We're basically the same, very based ideologically wise. Although, a religious democracy for me is really eh considering everything I've said about it, but in your case it would be the most practical.


 * [[File:BeryAbLib.png]] BeryAb ([[File:NeoClib.png]]/[[File:Nalib.png]]) - For someone whose right-libertarian leaning, you're pretty based. Our principles our the same but our end goals are different. Overall, good. (Also massive shame your reddit account got terminated out of no where, rip)


 * [[File:YellingLiber.png]] YellingYowie ([[File:Socliber.png]]/[[File:Neobert.png]]) - While your economics and cultural stances are acceptable, your foreign policy is severely misguided. Like, how do you plan on waging war in countries while also having a small government?


 * [[File:Liberal-icon.png]] Liberal ([[File:Scientocracy_Small.png]]/[[File:Socdem.png]]) - I like what I see here, based!


 * [[File:Enaysikey.png]] Enaysikey ([[File:Socliber.png]]/[[File:Neotech.png]]) - Welfare libertarian, nice. Although being into eugenics is weird.


 * [[File:Avelicius.png]] Joogotakensaad ([[File:Soccap.png]]/[[File:Progconf.png]]) - Welfare capitalist, based.


 * [[File:Cflski.png]] Sykar Socialist ([[File:3princ.png]]/[[File:Socdem.png]]) - Your economics don't sound bad and you also hate the PRC as well, so you're pretty well off in my book.


 * [[File:JudePortrait.png]] High Priest Jude ([[File:Dsa.png]]/[[File:Leftpop-0.png]]) - DemSoc, tolerable. Based cultural views too.


 * [[File:TonyNew.png]] Tony567 ([[File:Marketsoc.png]]/[[File:Sep.png]]) - Really weird set of beliefs. Market socialism is pretty eh, as an economy centered around workers co-ops has shown to be the most successful form of socialism, but still not desirable. Along with this separatism stuff.


 * [[File:Vonali.png]] Vonali ([[File:Socliber.png]]/[[File:Civlibert.png]]) - Progressive Social Libertarianism, not bad.


 * [[File:Skyrum536.png]] Skyrum536 ([[File:Demsocstar.png]]/[[File:Prog.png]]) - DemSoc, against authoritarianism and is a democratic federalist. Nice.


 * [[File:EvolvingSoc.png]] DuyQuangNguyenPham ([[File:Marketsoc.png]]/[[File:Civnat.png]]) - A more leftist version of me, I agree with him on a lot of stuff.


 * [[File:TheIced.png]] The Iced ([[File:Georgist.png]]/[[File:Transh.png]]) - Too reliant on free markets but LVT is based, and so is cultural progressivism.


 * [[File:SamKibGuy_icon_.png]] SamkibGuy ([[File:Republicanismpix.png]]/[[File:Thar.png]]) - Your ideology is good, but I don't understand how you can like authoritarian communists while fighting for democracy at the same time. Atleast we agree on Social democracy which is based.


 * [[File:Yoda8soup.png]] Yoda8soup ([[File:Socgeo.png]]/[[File:Ecosoc.png]]) - Your economics for me personally are too left-wing, but your progressivism, and environmentalism are both very based.


 * [[File:RabbitIcon.png]] ComradeRabit95 ([[File:Demsocstar.png]]/[[File:Leftnat.png]]) - Too lefty, but not bad. Don't know a whole lot about your ideology since you don't have anything on your page, just going off your ideologies alone.


 * [[File:And3small.png]] And3 ([[File:LibSocDemIcon.png]]/[[File:Globnat.png]]) - Seems like a libertarian and slightly more leftist version of me, what can I say, but, pretty based.


 * [[File:Silasf.png]] Sorcersilas is here ([[File:Distributist.png]]/[[File:Libms.png]]) - I prefer unions, but still, a decently good ideology.


 * [[File:Liberalsoc.png]] TheJester ([[File:Liberalsoc.png]]/[[File:Marketsoc.png]]) - Too left-wing for me personally, but still a decently based ideology. Love your cultural takes.


 * [[File:Realisticamm.png]] Am_m ([[File:Libms.png]]/[[File:Libsoc.png]]) - I'm glad to see your back. Your new ideology doesn't look that different, other than the world federalism. Your idea of a world government is interesting, but really idealistic. Other than that, I think this ideology is ok. I like civil libertarianism.

Meh

 * [[File:NSL.png]] Pirate Tails ([[File:Natprog.png]]/[[File:Liberaltarianism.png]])- If you were less nationalist then you'd be fine.


 * [[File:Sweatingcup.png]] SweatingCup2632 ([[File:Sec.png]]/[[File:Newkeynes.png]]) - Bootlicker, but not the worst.


 * [[File:Neoairisu.png]] SumisuAirisu ([[File:Demcon.png]]/[[File:Anqueer.png]]) - Meh honestly, not a fan of anarchism but could be worse.


 * [[File:Councilguy2.png]] Councilguy ([[File:Anpostleft.png]]/[[File:Ego.png]])- Not fond of egoism, but you're a nice user.


 * [[File:Ultroneism.png]] LordCompost86 ([[File:Ego.png]]/[[File:Skepticism.png]]) - Obviously not a fan of this ideology or egoism, but you seem like a nice person.


 * [[File:PostChronic.png]] ChronicFemcel ([[File:Anpostleft.png]]/[[File:Post-an.png]]) - Cringe egoist but nice person.


 * [[File:Neotechnocracy.png]] BasedCringeOrMeh ([[File:Neotechnocracy.png]]/[[File:Transh.png]])- Pretty based economically and culturally, but authoritarianism isn't based and democracy is cool.


 * [[File:Nivballf.png]] Niveous Laccolith ([[File:Ego.png]]/[[File:Anpostleft.png]]) - Anarchism is cringe. But is socially progressive.


 * [[File:Ancom_Furry.png]] ThisIsMyUsernameAAAA ([[File:Ancom.png]]/[[File:Antifa.png]]) - Based cultural values, but being an ancom isn't helping.


 * [[File:Affiliated-grump.png]] Affiliated ([[File:Postciv.png]]/[[File:Econil.png]]) - Some post civilization leftist, wonky and funny tbh.


 * [[File:TDRH.png]] ThatDudeRightHere ([[File:Liberalconservative.png]]/[[File:Cdem.png]]) - Not a whole lot to say about this, moderate conservativism is whatever to be honest. We do have a lot in common in interests through so that's cool.


 * [[File:Bsaheedism-icon.png]] Bsaheed527 ([[File:Post-an.png]]/[[File:Anpostleft.png]]) - Yeah, I'm really unsure what to say about this ideology. You as a person though, are chill.


 * [[File:Ashley.png]] AshleyHere ([[File:Libsoc.png]]/[[File:Indiv.png]]) - I honestly like your new ideological development. Still not great, but better than what it was before. Libertarian socialism atleast is a step up.


 * [[File:TipuiSmall.png]] Tipui ([[File:Ego.png]]/[[File:Anpostleft.png]]) - Another egoist, okay this is getting out of hand. I will say your earlier years were quite based, if that means anything.


 * [[File:M99.png]] M99.exe ([[File:Synd.png]]/[[File:Ormarxf.png]]) - A communist, albeit not the worst one I've seen and seems to be friendly towards socdems, atleast you're pragmatic.


 * [[File:DragonRed.png]] DragonRed ([[File:Dsa.png]]/[[File:Leftnat.png]]) - While promoting scientific advancement is definitely based, your authoritarianism is definitely not.


 * [[File:AbEntball.png]] The Grand Anarch ([[File:Post-an.png]]/[[File:Hedonism-cloud.png]]) - So you managed to make your ideology even more crazy, but honestly a step up from your last.


 * [[File:Drunkardsdjxfh.png]] Stk ([[File:Neoliberal-icon.png]]/[[File:Libhawk.png]]) - Doesn't fail in every regard, so gets refrained from putting in cringe. But still, neoliberal economics is cringe, and being a liberal hawk is no better than a Neoconservative.


 * [[File:S1984.png]] Savvas1984 ([[File:Statlib.png]]/[[File:Transh.png]]) - You're an unironic state liberal? Only good thing is your technological take.


 * [[file:Syntridem2.png]] Applethesky2021 ([[File:Cdem.png]]/[[File:Georgist.png]]) - Your mindless puritanicalness and interventionism are just awful, also worshiping dictators like Chiang kai shek is just cringe, the only good thing is your economics.


 * [[File:PagTheo.png]] Pantheon ([[File:Unimon.png]]/[[File:SocDist.png]]) - Surprisingly based economics, and I like civil libertarianism. But man, that monarchism stuff has to go. Also, is a vaushite as well.


 * [[File:Ioist.png]] Iooootheanarchist ([[File:Anqueer.png]]/[[File:Antifa.png]]) - Just your typical anarshit. Also, is weirdly an interventionist as well? Makes sense considering they are a vaushite. Atleast you have seemingly tolerable cultural takes.


 * [[File:InexUser.png.png]] Inexistent-User ([[File:Soctrans.png]]/[[File:Technocracy.png]]) - The only bit I really like about this is your endorsement of technological development, everything else is pretty cringe though.


 * [[File:TheElectricBomb.png]] TheElectricBomb ([[File:Lpop.png]]/[[File:Dsa.png]]) - Hating NATO and socialism is kinda cringe. But, I did indeed epically troll you.


 * [[File:Novochirotesla.png]] Chirotesla ([[File:Marketsoc.png]]/[[File:Consocf.png]]) - Your ideology may be one of the least bad out of the old leftists, but it has seriously gotten worse over time. Too left-wing on economics. Being anti-imperialist, environmentalist, a fair-trade protectionist, pro-choice, cultural integration that focuses more on culture tolerance, and more tolerant on LGBT issues than your other friends, which are all welcome. But, overall, too conservative for my liking.


 * [[File:Quark.png]] Quark ([[File:StateathFedora.png]]/[[File:Socgeo.png]]) - Cool dude, and has pretty decent economics. But, authoritarianism is something I cannot get behind under most circumstances.


 * [[File:Anglo-Germanic_Socialist.png]] Anglo-germanic socialist ([[File:Ormarxf.png]]/[[File:Progress.png]]) - Progressivism is hella based, but Marxism isn't.


 * [[File:MLM.png]] Marsvner ([[File:MLM.png]]/[[File:Ultraprogressivism.png]]) - I'm really not a fan of Marxism, but progressivism (even if you take it way too far for my liking) is cool.


 * [[File:TheFed.png]] TheFedGuy101 ([[File:CathDem.png]]/[[File:ClassDistr.png]]) - Economically wise, we somewhat match each other. But, everything else I see here is cringe, as I value my own individual worth over pointless things like organized religion or conservatism.


 * [[File:MrsVzrFlag.png]] Marsis [[File:MrsVzr2.png]] ([[File:Prog.png]]/[[File:Demsocstar.png]]/[[File:World Federalism2.png]]) - I don't hate or love any of your ideas, I dislike how you idolize utopian economics though. And, while alter-globalism is good, world federalism is unnecessary. But, progressivism is something I can get behind.

Not Good

 * [[File:Typicalfan2.png]] Typicalfan4 ([[File:Altl.png]]/[[File:Natcon.png]]) - Typical alt-lite, but still is a moderate.


 * [[File:USLibertarians.png]] NotADopeMan ([[File:Chilib.png]]/[[File:Obj.png]]) - A libertarian whose completely opposed to state intervention? Cringe, albeit not the worst thing I've seen. It's still pretty bad.


 * [[File:Libcon.png]] ResponsibleCitizen ([[File:Libcon.png]]/[[File:Conlib.png]]) - Conservativism and Libertarianism are gigasoy, along with isolationism. You seriously want the US to give up its influence in the world as a hyperpower? What is wrong with you?


 * [[File:SomeCrusade.png]] SomeCrusader1224 ([[File:Trad.png]]/[[File:Conlib.png]]) - This dude is my opposite in almost every way other than government, not a bad person though.


 * [[File:Smelegem.png]] Smelegem ([[File:MLM.png]]/[[File:Islamic_Democracy.png]]) - Unironic maoist. Literally one of the worst communists to ever exist in the history of ever with the worst economics that I've ever heard. Cool person though ig.


 * [[File:RojanALT.PNG]] Rojo346 ([[File:Conlib.png]]/[[File:Socliber.png]]) - Typical conservative, nahhhh... You as a person are fine though.


 * [[File:NeoLibtard.png]] ANewDude ([[File:Neoliberal-icon.png]]/[[File:Progressive_Imperialism.png]]) - Illiterate neoliberal retard who thinks hating neoliberalism means hating the global poor.


 * [[File:Distributist.png]] Dumnorix ([[File:Distributist.png]]/[[File:Trad.png]]) - Cringe conservative, but it's not everyday you see a traditionalist libleft.


 * [[File:JoeyFloppa_boo.png]] JoeyFloppa ([[File:Libcon.png]]/[[File:Austrobert.png]]) - I hardly see how you're an Individualist.


 * [[File:LeninisBasedsmall.png]] Leninisbased556 ([[File:ML.png]]/[[File:Authprog.png]]) - Progressivism is cool, but pretty cringy Marxist-leninist. (Also why are you so anti-semetic?)


 * [[File:Danielspaniel-Icon.png]] Danieltenspaniel ([[File:ML.png]]/[[File:StateathFedora.png]]) - A tankie who is atleast socially progressive.


 * [[File:MossadTest.png]] Mossad ([[File:Relzion.png]]/[[File:Conlib.png]]) - A religious conservative who stands for Israel. Basically PragerUism.


 * [[File:Azathoth.png]] Azathoth ([[File:Post-an.png]]/[[File:CountEn.png]]) - Nothing against you but you reject enlightenment thinking and are a reactionary anarchist, but you're not even socially conservative so you don't get put in the lowest tier.


 * [[File:Statlibertarian.png]] SuddenWriter - ([[File:Libertarian.png]]/[[File:Anticommunism.png]]) - I refuse to believe this is anything other than a meme lmao.


 * [[File:Cball-France-Beret.png]] Cheebow8 ([[File:Conservative.png]]/[[File:Trumpism.png]]) - Yeah, I'm basically not convinced by anything I read on this page. Conservatism is cringe and soy. Although, you are very friendly from what I've observed, I will give you that.


 * [[File:SST-icon.png]] ShadowRaiden ([[File:Consocf.png]]/[[File:Distributist.png]]) - You are too statist for my liking. With your isolationism, which I dislike, is really cringe for me. As I like economic unions and military alliances. Not to mention your ideology leans heavily into assimilation more than cultural tolerance, which for me is also cringe. Along with your cultural conservative stances in the first world, with some saving graces, are also cringe. At least we both want fair-trade protectionism. Not to mention, your economics being too left-wing for me is also kinda cringe as well.
 * [[File:DN_Adm.png]] DarknightYuusha-11 ([[File:Consocf.png]]/[[File:Marketsoc.png]]) - Basically, everything I said about Shadow could be applied to you, with there being not a whole of differences. Too left-wing on economics, first world cultural conservatism, and being really lenient on authoritarianism are really cringe for me.
 * [[File:Balodismconsmall.png]] IvarBalodis ([[File:Guildsoc.png]]/[[File:Consocf.png]]) - Corporatism is nice, even if it is socialist corporatism. Not to mention, "progressive in the third world, conservative in the first", or in other words, just conservative. Along with being too left-wing economically.
 * [[File:NeoML.png]] NotLibra ([[File:ML.png]]/[[File:Guevara.png]]) - Marxist-Leninist, not good. Atleast you are socially progressive and don't simp for revisionist ideologies like dengism (even if I dislike anti-revisionism because hardline ML's are cancerous) like a lot of modern ML's.
 * [[File:Xenoassemblage.png]] Xenosystems - ([[File:ColdGod.png]]/[[File:CybNil.png]]/[[File:POSTHUMANISMICON.png]]/[[File:Fut2.png]]) - You have interesting beliefs to say the least. The only thing I can really say that is tolerable about this ideology is its seemingly being progressive. Outside of that, I agree with next to nothing with this fever dream you call an ideology.

Bruh

 * [[File:KaiserKlaus.png]] KaiserKlausMouse ([[File:PanGerman.png]]/[[File:Cball-CSA.png]]/[[File:NeoFash.png]]) - Cringy larping fed.


 * [[File:Ukraiana.png]] Ukraiana ([[File:Neonazi_ball.png]]/[[File:Whitesup.png]]) - Typical wannabe internet fascist.


 * [[File:MedDavilanda.png]] Davilanda13 ([[File:Ancapf.png]]/[[File:Reactcross.png]]) - What a steaming pile of horseshit of an ideology. Ancaps are super edgy.


 * [[File:ReactionaryCentrism6.png]] Bannned ([[File:Cfash.png]]/[[File:Christy.png]]) - Firstly, this "centrist" was hardly a centrist. Secondly, Cringe edgelord larper. Glad SumisuAirisu made you live up to your username. Good riddance lol.


 * [[File:Coindorni-icon-new.png]] Coindorni ([[File:Ancapf.png]]/[[File:Reactcross.png]]) - Another reactionary ancap, how much of you guys just are secretly fascists in denial?


 * [[File:Vizantion-Storm.png]] TheHellenicStorm ([[File:Strasser.png]]/[[File:Neonazi_ball.png]]/[[File:Flang.png]]) - Nazi, credit where credit is due though you're an actual national socialist. Still a Nazi, which is fucking cringe, retarded, and most definitely a larp.


 * [[File:OrthReactPaleominarchist.png]] BasedRussianMikuru ([[File:Feud.png]]/[[File:Orth.png]]) - A reactionary theocratic larper who has defended feudalism. Overall very cringe and weird.


 * [[File:Heinrich_Cheung.png]] Heinrich Cheung ([[File:Neonazi_ball.png]]/[[File:Nazcap-Hat.png]]) - So this is the "superior aryan master race" I've heard so highly about, huh? Totally not a larp.


 * [[File:Classfash.png]] LKR15tye ([[File:Euras.png]]//[[File:Fash.png]]) - Fashoid. "He hates me as much as he hates the nazis according to his page". Your ideology has lead to nothing but death, destruction, and misery for all that had to suffer under it.


 * [[File:Duckf.png]] Duck-Citizen ([[File:Ancapf.png]]/[[File:Reactcross.png]]) - ancap? check. reactionary? check. vomit worthy ideology? check.


 * [[File:TolkienIRLicon.png]] Tolkien_IRL ([[File:Abmon.png]]/[[File:Nazcap-Hat.png]]) - If this serious, I have actually zero words.


 * [[File:Palostius.png]] Palostius ([[File:Ingsocf.png]]/[[File:Reactcross.png]]/[[File:Darwinist.png]]/[[File:Mansphere.png]]) - Sexist incel larper. How long as your ass been without a shower, holy shit. This entire dude's personality is gloating his shit takes.


 * [[File:Dualusf.png]] DualPlay1 ([[File:Statesoc.png]]/[[File:StateathFedora.png]]) - A conservative authoritarian communist. Basically just a cringier version of quark.


 * [[File:Noel21231-icon.png]] Noel21231 ([[File:Altl.png]]/[[File:Wumao.png]]/[[File:Reactlib.png]]) - Typical Malaysian Wumao retard who simps neo-nazis and thinks being "anti-woke" makes him cool.


 * [[File:EpicConIcon.png]] NazBolGANG12 ([[File:Tradcon.png]]/[[File:Distributist.png]]) - Ok, on a serious note, you're not getting put here because of your personality but because of your ideology. Your personality is fine, your ideology on the other hand is very cringe.


 * [[File:Socnat.png]] AmericanFuturist ([[File:Socnat.png]]/[[File:Fash.png]]) - Was cringe the first time, is still cringe the second time.


 * [[File:Baconsalad123_Icon.png]] Baconsalad123 ([[File:Sorelia.png]]/[[File:Nazi.png]]) - Racial nationalism, totalitarianism, fascism. Easily one of the most dystopian self-inserts on this site.


 * [[File:Svs.png]] SNEEDIVS ([[File:Catheo.png]]/[[File:Monarch.png]]) - Bruh why are there so many reactards on this site. I think this dude actually thinks it's the 10th century or something.


 * [[File:NatDem.png]] Black drone ([[File:Authcap.png]]/[[File:Authoritarian_Conservatism.png]]) - Now, this is a prime example as to why I will never get my morality from religion (as if every single reacttard on this site wasn't example enough). Where do I start? Authoritarian religious conservatism and manosphere? Yeah, along with you supporting corrupt politicians while being supposedly "anti-corruption". Pretty bad.


 * [[File:Firebender12345ism.png]] Firebender12345 ([[File:Monarch.png]]/[[File:3P.png]]) - Lol, Monarcho-fascist who wants to restore a failed political systems back in Ireland. Monarchy and fascism is dead for a reason, good luck with that.


 * [[File:ImmorThought.png]] TheImmorxy ([[File:Statesoc.png]]/[[File:Hoxha.png]]) - Just your averagely unremarkable Totalitarian Marxist-Leninist. Basically, nothing good.


 * [[File:Mikolayism_Pixel2.png]] MedicsChaotics ([[File:ModStrasser.png]]/[[File:Consocf.png]]) - Claims not to be anti-semitic, yet uses anti-semitic dogwhistles? Also, what is the hell is "moderate strasserism"? Any way, your authoritarianism and unironic liking of otto strasser are just massive nopes.


 * [[File:PATS.png]] ChineseSocialist ([[File:CronCapMask.png]]/[[File:Wumao.png]]/[[File:XiJinpingThoughtf.png]]) - Don't take this personally, as I mean this purely just on an ideological level. Your page gave me cancer and aids to read because of how illiterately written it was. Overall, just your average totalitarian dengoid china defender. Atleast you don't pretend that CCP is a government that respects human rights, which is atleast a nice surprise, as a lot of China defenders I see try to make China out to be better than what it is, you don't bother with any of that. Also, China isn't transitioning to socialism by 2050, nor are you a Marxist-Leninist.


 * [[File:Dengf.png]] 国际联盟球 ([[File:CronCapMask.png]]/[[File:Wumao.png]]/[[File:XiJinpingThoughtf.png]]) - Bruh, China is a totalitarian one party dictatorship with no respect for human rights. To side with all countries in the world, you choose the Chinese government?
 * [[File:RonziCom.png]] Ronzipot ([[File:Statesoc.png]]/[[File:Christcom.png]]) - Bruh this dude literally went from a classical liberal to an Marxist-Leninist in like a month, and he calls us larpers. Lol.
 * [[File:Technototball.png]] BERNHE0504 ([[File:NeoFash.png]]/[[File:Ultranat.png]]) - Now, you are, in every way, my political opposite. Not too different from all the fascist bs stuff I've seen

*Dies of cringe*

 * [[File:FabiusBigGayHat.png]] PaleoFabius ([[File:Altrightfemboyicon.png]]/[[File:Jnaz.png]]/[[File:Rwsjw.png]]/[[File:Hfash.png]]) - Massive asshole and a larper. Typical wannabe internet fascist who called several people within this community racial inferior. Overall, just your average alt-rightoid retard. Kys, racist asshole. Rip, bozo. And yes, Jews control all of our public institutions and international organizations, is that a problem Gaybius?


 * [[File:Mysticism.png]] Mysticism ([[File:EsoPinkCap.png]]/[[File:Jnaz.png]]/[[File:Rwsjw.png]]/[[File:Hfash.png]]) - Yes, I get my beliefs from paradox strategy games, how could you tell?


 * [[File:Soyjak.png]] AnAnonBoi123 ([[File:Postconan.png]]/[[File:Globnat.png]]/[[File:Kak.png]]) - Ok you really do just fucking suck, jesus christ. You cause so much unnecessary fights for no reason and when you get called out on it you just say it's an "ideological critique". Literally no one likes you, lmao.

Quadrant Relations =
 * [[File:Yugotard.png]] YugoslavPartisan2 ([[File:SJW.png]]/[[File:WokeCommiesucc.png]]/[[File:Altleft.png]]/[[File:Antifa.png]]) - Stalinoid who is the most typical SJW moron on this entire site. I once acted similarly to you, but I've changed my behavior since then because I know it's not worth getting into any worthless online drama, I recommend you do the same.

Based

 * [[File:Centrist-yellow.png]] Centrism - Nice, and moderate, like all should be. Extremism is cringe. And, centrist economics are just in-general pretty based, with the right amount of individuality with economic collectivism, you're perfect. The state should obviously be big enough to uphold harm prevention, but to also leave them alone whenever their freedom poses very little threat.
 * [[File:Libunity-yellow.png]] Libertarian Unity - You have the entirely right idea when it comes to individual freedom. But, you're too anti-statist. The state is still needed for harm prevention, otherwise, very based.

Neutral

 * [[File:Leftunity.png]] Leftist Unity - I'm not against socialism, nor do I think it failed each time. But, I'm still not keen on establishing it. Seeing as, I find socialism to be more exploitive for the average worker than capitalism is, just look up labor theory of value and see how bunk it is. But, at least a lot of your followers are progressive.
 * [[File:Libleft.png]] Libertarian Left - You'd be objectively better to live in than a libright society, I'll give you that. And you have the right idea when it comes to individual liberty. But, once again, too anti-statist. Along with many of your supporters being progressives, which is certifiably based.
 * [[File:Libright-yellow.png]] Libertarian Right - Right unity, but with some better characteristics. With supporting civil liberties, opposing interventionism, and paternalism, which is nice. But, still suffers from much of the same issues as right unity, with the addition that many adherents to this are socially conservative. But, it's not conservative, then it's remotely tolerable.

Cringe

 * [[File:Rightunity-yellow.png]] Rightist Unity - I'm against implimenting socialism, but I'm also against free-market capitalism as well. Capitalism may be the best system invited, but to fully trust it this much is just vomit worthy, and is exploitive.

Bruh
People Relations =
 * [[File:Authleft.png]] Authoritarian Left - Overly statist and bureaucratic nightmare, not to mention the wumao problem this quadrant has as well.
 * [[File:Authright.png]] Authoritarian Right - Authoritarian capitalism, name me something more vomit worthy to be honest. No respect for individual liberty or wealth redistribution? NOPE!
 * [[File:Authunity.png]] Authoritarian Unity - Your economics will unfortunately not save you from being put here. Many of you guys are alt-right retards and neo-nazis. Which is really cringe. And even your most moderate ideologies are still dumb, as overt parentalism is retarded, the individual should be allowed to do as they please.

Positive

 * [[File:Sanders.png]] Bernie Sanders (95/100) - You're a promising candidate, and have been fairly consistent on your views for your political carrier, which is admirable.


 * [[File:Shoecialism.png]] Shoe0nHead (90/100) - You were one of my first inspirations and introductions to politics. Although your earlier days were quite cringe. You've earned a special spot for one of the first political commentators I watched.


 * [[File:Mill.png]] John Stuart Mill (91/100) - The harm principle is based. Do what you want to do as long as you're not harming others is how society should be run.


 * [[File:RussiaOfTheFuture.png]] Alexei Navalny (82/100) - You expose the corruption of the United Russia Party and are way better alternative to the current Russian government.


 * [[File:Lincolnism.png]] Abraham Lincoln (83/100) - Ended slavery, shame you got assassinated.


 * [[File:Classlib.png]] John Locke (85/100) - While I am not a big fan of your economic model, you were quite based for your time, and so was the enlightenment. The way you fought against reactionary retards and monarchists was certified based.


 * [[File:FDRismF.png]] Franklin D. Roosevelt (90/100) - Gigachad in a lot of ways, fought against the Nazis and Japanese Imperalists, shame you had to put the Japanese in internment camps, and while they weren't on the same level as the holocaust, still sucks you had to do that.


 * [[File:Corbynism-ball.png]] Jeremy Corbyn (80/100) - I wouldn't in theory mind you compared to the austerity loving cucks within the Labour party, but socialism is not desirable.


 * [[File:NatProg.png]] Theodore Roosevelt (79/100) - Easily the best president we've ever had, up there with FDR. Although your Imperialism was pretty bad.


 * [[File:Keynes.png]] John Maynard Keynes (95/100) - The man who invented the best economic model, stay mad lolberts.


 * [[File:Gore.png]] Al Gore (88/100) - Based environmentalism, you would've been a lot better in many ways to George Bush.


 * [[File:MLK_Jr.png]] Martin Luther King Jr (94/100) - One of the best civil rights leaders in the 20th century, shame you got assassinated.


 * [[File:Cball-Ukraine.png]] Volodymyr Zelenskyy (79/100) - The sheer weight of the balls on this man. Keep fighting for the future of Ukraine! Slava Ukraini!


 * [[File:Gorb.png]] Mikhail Gorbachev (84/100) - Democratized the USSR, ended censorship, and was overall based.

Neutral/Mixed

 * [[File:AOC.png]] Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (34/100) - You come off as too politically inexperienced for me, progressivism is cool. Although my leftism only goes as far as social democracy.


 * [[File:Obamium.png]] Barrack Obama (57/100) - You did some good things like Obamacare and giving gay people marriage rights, but expanding the surveillance state and the drone strikes were very cringe.


 * [[File:Bidenism.png]] Joe Biden (43/100) - Your presidency up until this point as been the mixed bag. You may have done more good under your presidency than trump has, but you're still not what we need. Atleast your foreign policy in Ukraine has been superb. And the economic mess could've been handled better. But not your fault, it's even made worse by the fact that Republicans have actively been worsening the economy crisis and preventing you from fixing inflation. And you did do a good thing pulling out of Afghanistan, but even that was botched as well. I love your trade tariffs on China and your hawkish view towards the Chinese government. But even then, you seriously want to ease up those trade restrictions? Your candidacy has been overall not bad, but, ultimately not desirable.


 * [[File:Statlib.png]] Justin Trudeau (30/100) - I don't really like you but I can't really imagine what Canada would be like without the Liberal Democratic party. Even if I don't like it.


 * [[File:Long.png]] Huey Long (42/100) - While you did a lot of good for the state of Louisiana, the way you did it was bad! While you may be one of the only good authoritarians, someone could easily come on in and undue all your work and do worse and there would be nobody to stop them.


 * [[File:Tito.png]] Josip Broz Tito (45/100) - Most practical socialist, although authoritarianism is cringe. Atleast you threw fascists into pits and returned them to where they should go, which is undoubtedly based.


 * [[File:Cball-British_India.png]] George Orwell (44/100) - Being against authoritarianism is based, but your homophobia, conservatism, and general prejudice are cringe.


 * [[File:Kemal.png]] Mustafa Kemal Ataturk (55/100) - Modernizing turkey was based, but why all the genocide and other stuff?

Negative

 * [[File:Trumpism.png]] Donald Trump (21/100) - You were one of the worst presidents America had in the 21st century. Your tax cuts did not help anyone but the rich, your attacks on American democracy and your authoritarianism, careless protectionist policies, climate denialism. Realistically, should've been impeached. How you haven't been disowned by the GOP establishment astounds me.


 * [[File:Vaushism.png]] Vaush (21/100) - Don't care too much about his ideology but personality wise, yeah he's pretty bad. He defended child porn and is probably a zoophile.


 * [[File:Reagan.png]] Ronald Reagan (12/100) - Overall, one of the worst presidents America ever had to endure, tricke-down economics are a scam that only made the rich richer and the poor poorer, funded terrorists, and your presidency still has a profound effect on America today. (you're also in hell waiting for heaven to trickle onto you)


 * [[File:Thatcher.png]] Margaret Thatcher (12/100) - Ding dong, the wicked bitch is dead.


 * [[File:Shapirocube.png]] Ben Shapiro (13/100) - You're a massive dumbass who can only win debates with college kids. Why anyone listens to you is beyond me.


 * [[File:Christianright.png]] Steven Crowder (13/100) - Overall, a massive pussy.


 * [[File:MagicPT.png]] Henry Kissinger (11/100) - Pretty much a terrorist. I really hope you get what's coming to you one day.


 * [[File:Chilib.png]] Milton Friedman (14/100) - Lolbert. Go learn some basic economics.


 * [[File:RonPaul.png]] Ron Paul (14/100) - Everything I despise neatly rapt up into one little package!


 * [[File:BoJo.png]] Boris Johnson (12/100) - Not only was brexit very cringe, your leadership in general is just terrible.


 * [[File:FIDESZ.png]] Viktor Orbán (11/100) - Very cringe Russian asset who is destroying his own country.
 * [[File:Mesocon.png]] Dennis Prager (12/100) - Founder of PragerU, enough said.


 * [[File:GWB.png]] George W. Bush (11/100) - War mongering imperialist and war criminal.


 * [[File:PiS.png]] Andrzej Duda (14/100) - Your party is a laughing stock. From its corruption, authoritarianism, nothing good I can say about it.


 * [[File:Plutocrat.png]] Elon Musk (11/100) - You should be thrown in jail, and your monopoly broken up.


 * [[File:Plutocrat.png]] Jeff Bezos (11/100) - Amazon should be broken up.


 * [[File:Plutocrat.png]] Mark Zuckerberg (11/100) - We all know you're a lizard. Also fuck facebook and the metaverse.

Very Negative

 * [[File:Hitler.png]] Basically, anything related to the Nazis or other Fascist groups (-infinite/100) - The amount of suffering you've inflicted onto the world will never be forgotten. Never again.


 * [[File:Polpot.png]] Pol Pot (-infinite/100) - You left Cambodia in ruins and were a genocidal maniac.


 * [[File:Baath.png]] Bashar Al Assad (6/100) - Genocidal and incompetent. Although God, Syria, and Bashar is an absolute bop, why do authoritarian regimes always make the best songs?


 * [[File:Putin.png]] Vladimir Putin (6/100) - I hope one way your despotic, corrupt rule comes to an end (and hopefully you get assassinated). Alexei Navalny is the future Russia needs. SLAVA UKRAINI!


 * [[File:Lukash.png]] Alexander Lukashenko (6/100) - Cringe despot, I fully back the protests against the Byelorussia government. Hopefully one day your reign comes to an end and the Byelorussian people do not have to live under your tyranny.


 * [[File:Dengf.png]] Deng Xiaoping (8/100) - Your reforms may have helped and were necessary for China, but you still quite evil. Not AS bad as your predecessors, but still awful. Not to mention, what you did to things like welfare programs, the protesters, ect.


 * [[File:XiJinpingThoughtf.png]] Xi Jinping (0/100) - You've in a lot of ways ruined China and set it on a course for failure, undoing Deng's reforms. Just to think there was some chance China could see a better future. Fuck you! Burn in hell forever, genocidal totalitarian tyrant.


 * [[File:Mao.png]] Mao Zedong (-infinite/100) - You may have brought china out of the feudal system and gave women rights, but you were a totalitarian genocidal maniac who starved millions upon millions of his own people.


 * [[File:Stalin.png]] Joseph Stalin (-infinite/100) - You killed millions of your own people for quite literally no reason. Like, the worst of the worst.


 * [[File:Pinochet-hat.png]] Augusto Pinochet (0/100) - Many of Chile's modern problems can be attributed to you! How about I throw you out of a helicopter.


 * [[File:Hoppef.png]] Hans-Hermann Hoppe (0/100) - As if the retarded ancap larping wasn't enough, this "physical removal" stuff is just on another level of stupid.


 * [[File:Obj.png]] Ayn Rand (0/100) - Worst thing Stalin did was let this bitch out of the USSR alive. Objectivism, more like, objectively shit.

Q&A

 * - Feel free to ask me anything within this section. If you want to view old comments, go here.
 * Q UserWiki:DragonRed - Why did you become pan nationalist when you were a anti -nationalist?
 * A - Well I became more nationalist because of my stances on immigration so i figured an ideology that supports both nationalism and internationalism would only make sense to adopt since I never stopped being the former.
 * Q UserWiki:Ninjack-Aus - If all western liberal democracies (IE, NATO/EU) where to collapse, what non-atlanticist ideology would you least dislike to take it's place?
 * A - Well preferably ideologies that allow free and fair elections, anything that isn't utopic that allows for such would be fine by me (mostly). I can't really say, but that's the best answer I can give.
 * Q [[File:Panth.png]] - What are your thoughts on Yan Xishan thought?
 * A - It's conservative and authoritarian, so I don't like it.
 * Q - What's your opinion on the President of Palau, Surangel Whipps Jr?
 * A - i know nothing about the politics of Palau, so idk.

Comments

 * - If you want to make any comments, make them here.


 * - add me
 * - Ok!
 * - Hey, Matteel. Don’t forget to add me when you get the chance!
 * - That's already been done.


 * - Add me here (for the lulz, please and thank you).
 * - ok
 * - Why did you give Gorbachev such a high mark? His ideologies were based, but he was incompetent as hell and didn't do anything to stop kleptocrats like Yeltsin. He was part of why Russia and post-Soviet states are in their current state.
 * - Well i rank him that high because I like him as a figure, sure he didn't do a whole lot to stop that, but I still like the reforms he did make during the time period, even if did cause the eventual decline of the USSR. But you're right, I lowered his ranking I gave him slightly just to take in factor all of that.
 * [[File:Panth.png]] - Who do you simp for?
 * - Well I said I liked progressive democrats, so take anyone there that is anything center of left (although nothing past that) and I probably have a good opinion of them.


 * - Hey man, I have adjusted my review for your page.
 * - Thanks ^.^

Userwiki:Marsvner - dude can you add me in discord? My discord name is marsvner#2980.
 * happy forth of july Westoid ☠️2🇺🇸
 * - Cope commie.
 * My best friend on this site
 * - What do you mean?
 * - I changed many things, update relations on me
 * - Sure thing.
 * - Yo there, add me?
 * - Almost done finishing up my page, give me tomorrow from the point I sent this message


 * [[File:MrsVzrFlag.png]] Marsis [[File:MrsVzr2.png]] - I added you, feel free to add me as well
 * - You will be added to me page
 * - Hi matteel, I'm once again asking your opinion on LiangGuoxiong,he claims to be a trotskyist but keeps flirting in Hongkong LSD,also imma eager to see your opinion of trotskyists inside socdem UK Labour Party.
 * - I don't know who that is unfortunately.
 * - Pls update thnx
 * - Alright, will do.
 * - Ok but this doesn't change the indisputable fact that laissez-faire capitalism is a failure and that free-markets are also a failure and that libertarianism failed us and that neoliberalism is almost as dumb as libertarianism and that John Locke and Adam Smith both oppose libertarianism and that both of them wanted regulation or a government and that John Locke supported taxes and that minarchists and "anarcho-capitalists" which aren't even real anarchists are neo-feudalists who want massive wealth inequality and a class system between the bourgeoisie and the proletariat and that under free-markets more than 40% of food is wasted and thrown in the dumps when they could be used feeding people and that classical liberalism failed 7 times in the span of 50 years and that employers treat their employees badly to maximize profit and that the CEO of a billion-dollar corporation will spend millions to bust unions when they could just let the employees build a union so the employees get represented but they don't because they are greedy and would prefer the extra millions of dollars more than their employees being treated well and that the NAP is stupid and flawed and that libertarians worship the NAP like it's a god and that capitalism makes people greedy and that capitalism needs reform and regulation in order to be successful and that libertarianism and classical liberalism will just lead to crony capitalism with an oligarchy of a few extremely wealthy billionaires while there are people barely getting by and that currently the 3,000 richest people in the world have more wealth than the rest of the world combined and if that doesn't prove that the system is messed up then that proves that you support people working terrible wages to barely get by and that unions are the best counter to tyrannical employers and that the minimum wage should be increased so the employees make more money and that child labor is immoral and that people in third-world countries shouldn't be getting paid such bad wages and that anarcho-capitalism is an oxymoron because there is a class system between the bourgeoisie and the proletariat while anarchy seeks to remove all hierarchy and that anarcho-capitalism should be just renamed to "fascist-capitalism" because it allows the people with a lot of money to control our lives in every way possible however they want and the government isn't there to protect us. (2 extra notes: I didn't make most of the copypasta but I agree with most of it).
 * - I don't know were this came from, but I agree.