UserWiki:YellingYowie

I edit grammar and other little things on the wiki. I'm a Social Libertarian but I also really like Neo-Libertarianism, Technogaianism, and Third-way. I joined in December 2020 but didn't get involved in the wiki community until February 2021.

My ideology Neo Social Libertarianism

Icon:(YellingLiber.png)

Pronouns page: https://en.pronouns.page/@YellingYowie

[[File:Neobert.png]] Government [[File:Socliber.png]]
I abide by a philosophy of maximum liberty. You may be wondering why I am not an anarchist then. I have come to the conclusion that Anarchy is Anti Liberty because though it embraces Negative Liberty and in some cases (such as Anarcho-Communism) Positive Liberty, it utterly rejects the third principle of Liberty known as greater liberty. Greater liberty is essentially the freedom of security, the freedom to be safe. Only one ideology has successfully acknowledged this version and combined it Negative Liberty Neo-Libertarianism. I hope to expand on this model with the inclusion of Positive Liberty so that the most disadvantaged in society will not suffer.

[[File:Dem.png]] Democracy [[File:Semidirect.png]]
Democracy has often been called the least worst system which is true but also a very complicated way of saying democracy is the best system. Democracy is the best way of getting stuff done. Violence is justified if it is against an anti-democratic government. If you want a "revolution" to undermine a democratic system but then restore democracy but only for ((enter group here)) then you are a Fascist with a very poor mask on. I believe the best system to be Semi-Direct Democracy. It emphasizes efficiency with control from the people. It prevents the "tyranny of the majority" that comes with Direct Democracy but also the oligarchic corruption that comes with Representative Democracy.

[[File:Nordmodel.png]] Economy [[File:Socliber.png]]
If we take a look at the world and History as a whole we can see what works at what does not. Communism did not work and Socialism also did not work. You may say "those countries that tried communism/socialism are not Communist/Socialist, they're state capitalist. That wasn't real communism." If that is indeed the case then does that not show the failure of communism. Maybe communism will ALWAYS devolve into state capitalism. Western Imperialism might also be blamed but I would think that rather shows a critical flaw in communist society's lasting power. The examples provided for successful Socialist and Communist societies are Rojava, Catalonia, Yugoslavia, and Chile. The Rojavan government has close connections to the PKK a terrorist group in southern turkey that employes child Labour. Admittedly having close connections to shady groups is nothing new for countries but the region has been a point of complaint among human rights groups for years. Anarchist Catalonia was only a paradise when compared to Franco's regime. It brutally punished deserters and burned down countless churches. Freedom of Religion is important to Society less we become like some of the most brutal regimes in history. Yugoslavia was very successful for many years...if you were Serbian. Yugoslavia's success came at the expense of the other ethnic groups, especially the Albanians. Everything collapsed once Tito died and I don't want to live in a society completely hinging on one dictator. Chile under Allende is often pointed out to be the best representation of Socialism and I could not agree more. It started out looking good but eventually saw the end of democracy and Fascists take control in a power vacuum led by foreign powers, the inevitable fate of all Socialist Societies. The final flaw in Socialism comes from its denial of liberty. Finally, In a socialist society if a workplace democratically decides that they want to be paid wages this is not allowed. The needs of the working class are therefore ignored. We have now successfully ruled out Socialism as an option, so what are we left with? Distrubitsm denies public property (a thing I personally like very much) while Georgism has the opposite problem. Why not Capitalism then. Capitalism has successfully not only survived the gauntlet of History but emerged victorious with the highest quality of life ever. The most successful countries in the world I would argue are those of the Nordic Region + Germany and Switzerland. What all these countries have in common is a Welfarist Capitalist economic system that we can further expand on. Universal Basic Income is not only feasible but prepares for an increasingly approaching problem of mass unemployment due to automation. We can't stop automation but we can work with and around it. Many American Socialists claim we are living in late-stage Capitalism. This is untrue, late-stage capitalism does not exist. Late-Stage Neoliberalism (or just normal neoliberalism) does however and I believe that to be our current problem. One which we can solve through compassionate forward-thinking Capitalism.

[[File:Progress.png]] Civil Rights [[File:Prgess.png]]
Progress is inevitable. Throughout history, we have continued to progress even if we had many challenges and "rough spots" we have nonetheless continued to progress civil rights. Civil Rights should not even be an issue anymore. We have made a clear distinction between gender and sex, I don't think it's so complicated that maybe people like people of different genders, and the idea that maybe Racism still exists is not that complicated. Sidenote: Affirmative Action should be taken on a case by case basis.

[[File:World.png]] Foreign Policy [[File:3way.png]]
I am a globalist. I believe that only through the world working together can we achieve the best possible future. That said some places are unfortunately not democratic and thus we have a problem. The solution is an alliance of democratic states working together to counterbalance the authoritarian states in the world. Ultatimley as long as Authoritarian countries exist, I will not support World Federalism for it could bring disastrous consequences. Now for my most controversial opinions. I think military foreign intervention is justified when used against an authoritarian regime. For my first example, I point to WW2. I would hope you would agree that the Axis powers were an evil force in the world who needed to be stopped as soon as possible. Yet for years we sat back and watched as Germany and Japan grabbed even more land. WW2 could have been ended earlier but instead, every country waited, hoping for a false peace that would not come. Many will say the problem with modern foreign intervention is ultimately boiled down to 3 problems which I will now address.

1: Foreign Intervention by Western Powers is only used to gain oil: The only country in which the US intervened because of oil is Iraq. Oil might have been an enticing factor to intervene in other countries but was not the overwhelming reason. The invasion of Iraq is still justified, (even if I think it was handled beyond awfully) because Saddam Hussein was a dictator, he killed up to 1/4th of the entire casualties of the Iraq war in only a week with the Al-Anfal campaign, and he was selling oil to China. We often forget that if we do not act on the world stage then other powers will. I admittedly wish that the US had eventually gone into Iraq based on his previous war crimes and not just oil but it is certainly justifiable. Conclusion: It's upsetting that the US government is so motivated by money but ultimately a dictator was overthrown. Intervention was not the problem in this situation but rather the people in charge.

2: Countries don't want to be democracies, they should be able to choose their own form of governance: Countries don't have feelings people do. People should choose their own form of governance and there is a word for that. It's democracy.

3: Foreign Intervention is purely motivated by racism: This statement is just blatantly false. We are not living in the 1800s. Wars these days (at least mostly) are about geopolitical manoeuvering.

I am not a "hawk". I believe we should get out of countries such as Pakistan. I don't support declaring war on just any country. I believe the Iraq war was handled poorly and The US should have not intervened directly in any more countries until it was sure Afghanistan was all wrapped up. I do not support the exchange of a socialist dictator for a Capitalist one. If a war crime happens of course I will condemn it. I actually quite like peace and I usually think violence is not the answer. That said I think it would not be wrong to keep our options open. If a terrorist runs a plane into a building you go find the terrorist and make sure that they are not a threat anymore. That is not an act of hate that is basic national security.

[[File:Zio.png]] Isreal and Palestine [[File:Cball-Palestine.png]]
If you simp for either side on this conflict you are officially kinda cringe in my book. A two-state solution seems like the best alternative for right now. My ultimate solution would to let the people of both countries decide what they want. If Isreal takes over then what happens to the Arabs? If Palestine takes over what happens to the jews?

[[File:Cball-China.png]] China and Friends [[File:Cball-Taiwan.png]]
I am siding against China in every single one of their international disputes. The one exception would be in their war with the Taliban-backed East Turkestan Islamic Movement. Still, FREE EAST TURKESTAN!!!

[[File:Cball-Russia.png]] Russia and Ukraine [[File:Cball-Ukraine.png]]
Crimea deserves independence. Other than that all occupied territory belongs to Ukraine.

[[File:Cball-Serbia.png]] Serbia and Kosovo [[File:Cball-Kosovo.png]]
Kosovo is an independent country. This should be obvious to everyone.

[[File:Cball-Somalia.png]] Somalia and Somaliland [[File:Cball-Somaliland.png]]
Somaliland is an independent country. I support the US being involved in the conflicts in Somalia but I would be neutral on a withdrawal from the region.

[[File:Cball-Syria.png]] Syria and Iraq [[File:Cball-Iraq.png]]
The US should have a more active role in Syria. Trump (as usual) was an idiot when he removed troops from the Kurdish/Turkish border. Turkey has continued to commit horrendous atrocities in Rojava and that must be rectified. HOWEVER, NOT WITH GOING TO WAR WITH TURKEY! As for Iraq, I am fine with the withdrawal even though personally I would have not supported it.

[[File:Castro.png]] Cuba [[File:Cball-US.png]]
Cuba is a hellhole dictatorship. Screw you if you think Cuba is some paradise you brainwashed anti-human rights puppet. The Cuban protests ARE about the Castro regime despite what some people, would tell you.

[[File:Cball-Taliban.png]] Afghanistan and Pakistan [[File:Cball-Pakistan.png]]
The US should have not left Afghanistan. Many call the US intervention in Afghanistan a failure and though is mostly true, I think it was worth it for all the Afghan women who could actually go to school, have a life, and not hide their faces constantly for at least a few years. The US should GTFO of Pakistan tho. Not because of anything the US did but rather because Pakistan actively funds the people it is fighting.

[[File:Cball-Libya.png]] Libya [[File:Cball-Isis.png]]
I wholeheartedly support US intervention in Libya. Suck it Kleptocratic, jihadist, and Communist puppets.

[[File:Cball-Yemen.png]] Yemen [[File:Cball-Saudi.png]]
The US should have never been in Yemen (unless it was to support South Yemen).

[[File:Cball-Georgia.png]] Georgia and The Caucuses [[File:Cball-Artsakh.png]]
I support Artsakh. I think a referendum should be held in the areas succeeding in Northern Georgia.

That should cover all the main ones if you have any questions ask me on my user talk page.

Test Results
PoliticalCompassTest:/

SalppyValues:///

BannnedValues:/

Bad Optics!: Liberalism

8Values:Social Libertarianism

EconValues: Modern Liberalism

RightValues: Technocracy

8dreams: Social Kakistocracy

AmericanValues: Socialism

AmericanValues 2: Modern Democrat

IdeoSorter: Social Libertarianism,  Geolibertarianism

CapValues: Social Meritocracy

LeftValues: Democratic Socialism

ConservaValues: Third Way

6Foundations: Social Libertarianism

DozenValues: Liberaltarianism,  Liberalism

NewValues: Social Democracy

EconomyValues: Centrism

AuthValues: Fiscal Conservatism

Banned-Axes: Bleeding-Heart Libertarianism

7Axes: Centrism

Cultural Values: Anarchism

Unbiased Values: Anarcho-Communism

KiwiValues-Ideolgy: Progressive Liberalism

Kiwi Values-Parties: The Opprotunities Party

IdeoShapes: Neo Classical Liberalism,  Neoliberalism,  Libertarianism,  Social Liberalism

What is Your Political Ideology: Liberalism

Political Spectrum Self-Test: Liberal Democrat,  Socialism

Political Persona: Social Libertarianism

Quiz: Monarchist?: Classical Liberalism

MyPolitics-Ideolgy: Social Liberalism

MyPolitics-Parties: Liberal Democrats,  Polska 2050

Quiz: Economic Compass: Longism,  Regulationism

Isidewith: Democratic Party,  Transhumanist Party,  Green Party,  Socialist Party USA

CapacValues: Classical Liberalism

CenterValues: Modern day politician

PolitiCube: Centrist-Individualism

Which government most closely matches your political views?: Uruguay,  Czech Republic

Murderous Villan Test: Osama bin Laden

How populist are you? (Leader): Barrack Obamaba

American Political Bloc Quiz: Progressivism

What type of Socialist are you?: Democratic Socialist

What type of Conservative are you?: Neoconservative

What type of Classical Liberal are you?: Minarchist

What type of Fascist are you?: Classical Fascist

Prefered Political Parties
Note: I include political parties based on 1. Where I live or spend significant time in (US and France) 2. Places where my Familly used to live or spent significant time in (Germany, France, Spain, Denmark, Mexico, South Africa, and Kenya) 3. Places where I still have signifcant familly (Norway and Italy) California National Party Forward Party Transhumanist Party Democratic Party La République En Marche! Alliance 90/The Greens Radikale Venstre Partido Socialista Obrero Español (PSOE) Movimiento Regeneración Nacional Patriotic Alliance Congress of the People (COPE) Demokratiese Alliansie (Democratic Alliance) Amani National Congress Orange Democratic Movement Arbeidarpartiet Italia Viva

Political (or semi-political) Youtube Recommendations
Kraut Bastiat  J.J.McCullough  LSP  Arken the Amerikan  Three Arrows  Lucas Bender Knowing Better JrEg IdeoLogs Dylan Burns

Political Journey
+-->-->-->--> (++)

Relationships
(Notes: My ranking of you will be almost purely off ideology. I may make references to your personality, but it will not affect which tier I put you in)

Double Based Gang: Ninjack-Aus- Unfortunately not active anymore. Legend albeit a bit more left than me.

Based Gang: Jokie- Though I'm not nearly as into Transhumanism still very based Social Libertarians!!! Kirbly- Same as above (probably the most based user on social policies.) Potato6132- Helped me create my page on the old anarchy wiki and fellow Social Libertarian. BeryAB- It's okay, I accept Neolibs. ThatDudeRightHere- A very based individual. Enayslikey- Based Social Libertarian but liberal Eugenicism scares me. I guess it's not too bad when you explain it. Mebrouk- Islamic Democracy mixed with progressivism sounds uber-based. ANewDude- Not great economics but irrelevant considering your cultural stance and your foreign policy. The only other interventionist on here. Matteel- Social Democracy and progressivism are both uber based.

Positive-Leaning Gang: AveliCus- Overall based but hates globalism. PirateTails- Based Economics but hates globalism. Rojo346- Based Social Libertarianism but conservatism is cringe.

Mixed Gang: DuyQuangNguyenPham- Market Socialism is better than normal Socialism but I still think it will lead to rampant corruption. Other than that your ideology is based. Sweatingcup- Pretty based albeit a little conservative. I have to put you in this tier tho because of how cringe Law and Justice and Authoritarian Democracy is. Bacon Wobbuffet- Way to conservative and nationalist but otherwise fine. Dumnorix - War CAN be justified. That does not excuse the horrific actions committed if they are committed. At some point, you are no longer pacifist and just become fascist. Other than that your ideology is fine. ChiroPro- Socialism is dumb but at least ur still democratic. Also, you have pretty childish social views. Mossad- Zionism is bad and conservatism is cringe but other than that you're fine. Typical Fan 1- We may disagree on Most issues but at least you care about democracy. Tony567- LETS GO! Your not a Kakistocratic Corprate shill after all. Anyways over all your ideology is pretty based. That said I think crashing the US economy is a VERY VERY bad idea. Yoda8soup- I'm not a big fan of socialism but hey at least we both like star wars.

Not Gang: NazBolGANG- Though a nice person he believes in classical conservatism and "degeneracy". Just why? KaiserKlausMouse- Kaiser is a Fascist who believes in the ridiculously racist ideals of ethnonationalism. He believes in authoritarianism which denies the wishes of the people. He does not believe in freedom of speech, freedom of religion, or human rights. He claims to not be a racist or an anti-semite yet he also says stuff like "Germany has had to live in shame ever since the tragedy that was the Second World War. Denazification has made Germans self-hating for what their ancestors have caused. This is a critical flaw in Germany. Germans must do a complete 180 in their view of themselves. Germany is currently a slave to the EU. We have lost not only our land, but also our autonomy, our pride, and now we are a pitiful nation where you are shunned for simply saying "Deutschland Über Alles." We erect a monument of shame in our own capital. Nationalism must return to Germany." The monument of national shame referred to here is the Memorial to the Murdered Jews of Europe. He also denies that the American Civil War was over slavery (red state education woes) and somehow believes there are no more racist laws out there lmao. He is horribly homophobic (why?) and denies the biological reality of trans people. He calls abortion genocide (oh so now you care about genocide lmao) and wants to illegalize prostitution probably because he finds it icky but will use a cool term like "degenerate" to make himself seem cooler. His comments on animal rights give me the impression that he is at most a middle schooler. Best of all he does not actually hold German citizenship nor does he speak German so him trying to promote himself as a german ultranationalist is quite funny. YugoslavPartisan- This entire person's ideology revolves around "death to the amerikkan empire" and if they were alive in the late 1930s I have no doubts they would have supported Hitler. They actively support Jihadist, Theocratic, and deeply homophobic groups because "Isreal bad." They say that fascism is better than Neoliberalism because "Capitalism bad" AND they support various brutal dictators and is even apologetic towards Stalin because, once again, "Amerikkka bad". They are not a progressive, only a tankie. Ukraiana- A deeply homophobic and Transphobic fascist who would support genocide. Need I say more? DarknightYuusha-11- The definition of Fascism has changed quite a bit over the years so no it does not mean what it did in the 1920s. By the modern definition, I would say you are certainly at least close to fascism. Your ideology is homophobic, transphobic, and authoritarian. Not to mention you worship the rapist dictator Gaddafi. HeinrichCheung- A dystopian larping NazCap DoomerCrusader- A non racist Nazi is an oxymoron. Davilanda13- Anarcho-Capitalism is an awful system, to begin with, but now with the introduction of the WORST ECONOMIC SYSTEM EVER CONCEIVED BY MAN, it makes it unbearble. ComradeShrek- Another Gadaffi worshiper who is also deeply reactionary AND worships the genocidal maniac, Stalin. TheImmorxy- See above. Carpenter Family - Authoritarianism is bad. Bsaheed527- Ur ideology is super cringe and frankly a little dystopian (that said you are one of the nicest people on this wiki). Councilguy- Books written by 200 year old dead guys a society does not make. Also OOOOOO scary supply lines. Smelegem- Mao killed more people than anyone ever and you think he is a good role model?!? Affiliated- At least he can back up his claims with sources unlike the other egoists but still read councilguy's section. DragonRed- Cringe Authoritarianism and awful immigration policy. Ashley Here- See councilguy section. Toilken IRl- A reactionary Monarchist Nazcap. Also known as fatherless. Leninisbased- Tankie who would prefer living under Pol Pot rather than the status quo. He is also anti-semetic. Quark- Kinda based but HOLY SHIT YOU ARE RACIST!!! NO, DO NOT KILL ALL THE RELIGIOUS PEOPLE!!!!!!

"Artwork" I have made


OG Neo Social Libertarianism ball.



Bolshevismball created for the ideologyball wiki (old version of Polcompball).



My avatar for the month of June 2021.



Christmas-themed avatar.



Centrist Marxism



Capitalism (from a distance)



German Politics circa 2022



California National Party

Artwork I am featured in


User Compass by Deyvid (ignore file name. I was an idiot while uploading. My apologies.)



Self Insert Compass by Sykar Socialist



Self Insert Compass by Ukraiana



LibsOnly by BeryAB



Yeetingyowie by BeryAB



SocBerts bombing the Middle East by Rojo346



Anti Imperialism by Ukraiana



Group Cuddle by BeryAB



New Left VS Inclusive Right by BeryAB



National/Cultural Compass by Pirate Tails



PCB in North America by Tony567



Preview for next comic by Tony567



Bman using his advantageous shape to impale Yowie for no particular reason by BeryAB



USA Polcompball All endings: Neo Social Libertarianism becomes status quo by NazbolGANG



PCB Jailbreak Part 1 by Tony567



Liberal Compass by BeryAB



PCB-The Hyperborean Bidenreich poster by Sussy Nuoh



Two Nazcaps meet (with Yowie drone strike in the background) by BeryAB



Neo Social Libertarianball by Quark

Credits and Refrences
Credit to Potato6132 for creating my icon the first time (I lost the original file tho) and EugeneTLT for creating my current icon. Both are very based.

Comments

 * Merry Christmas!

Yelvia - Hello, Can you add me, please?

- add me? Tolkien IRL - Add me?

Leninisbased: add me cringe neocon

-“ Your not a Kakistocratic Corprate shill after all” never was. also i am a interventionist as well

- update relations with me?

Leninisbased: "Tankie who would prefer living under Pol Pot rather than the status quo." Maybe