UserWiki:ShadowRaiden

Rewriting this page

Good luck:D

Thanks! -

Hey, I’m ComradeGanyu. I’m an American user. I’m economically center-left to left, culturally center-right, and nationalist.

Note that I say a lot of stupid shit particularly at night

Creator of many fedtastic inside jokes

Economic
Leaning more towards market economics, it believes that the market drives innovation. However, to avoid the evil practices of neoliberalism and laissez-faire, a strong safety net will be put in place in order to protect workers and consumers alike. As for the price of products, a variety of factors will be detrimental to acceptable prices, such as quality and category. But overall speaking, said product may be sold for whatever within the range is acceptable. However, local planning will still be done to a degree. With local governments managing a significant part of economic affairs, and making their own economic decisions. However, nationwide laws and regulations must still be followed.

A partnership between the workers, employers, and local (or in the case of a major industry/big business, national) governments, would be implemented in order for both to regulate the workplace by themselves. Ideally there should be workers' representation in the workplace, although with the employer still having significant control. As for unions themselves, they can be both good and bad. The good aspects of them include fighting for workers rights, better wages, and the workers overall exercising their right to work and freedom of association. And they have increased workers rights in the past, and the struggle still continues thanks to corporate lobbyists. However, some negative effects include how they can become self-serving and unwilling to cooperate, essentially causing unrest and disorganization to the workplace, which could cause problems if widespread. In short, one shall have a right to join a union organization, however, there are laws that said unions must follow, and there must be reasoning behind strikes. In the event of genuine oppression or mistreatment of the workers, it will be accepted and supported. If it’s for reasons due to dissatisfaction, a negotiating body shall hold negotiations between the workers and the employers. But what a union would be punished for is if said strike was done for greedy or self-serving intentions. However, with the current status quo, collaboration is near impossible, with greedy corporations and billionaires continuously oppressing or underpaying their workers. So for now, I support class struggle.

Opposed to free trade and autarky, it plans on implementing a fair trade policy. Low tariffs and protectionism would be implemented in order to protect the nation’s interests.

There would be a mix of private and public enterprises. Public enterprises would include big businesses, major industries, essential services, and public transportation. Small and medium businesses, meanwhile, will be privatized. Those public enterprises would have guilds formed based on which category each of them fits into. As for healthcare, there will be a public service, with private options available, all covered by the state. However, even the private health facilities will still be subject to regulations (for example, not allowed to give abortions, must sell medicine at a set price). And likewise, they’d have to be part of guilds, which would be organized on a local level. Same case for education, a mix of private and public schools will exist, but must follow set rules for the education system, and will be absorbed into a guild. Energy would be public, and the state would begin transitioning to green energy. All other industries that produce carbon footprint will be forced to make the transition as well

Landlordism is an evil institution which puts property into the hands of a few elitists. As such, landlords should not exist. Instead housing will be given via guilds

There would be a large amount of social programs for two reasons: 1: to help those struggling, and 2: to develop society. Taxpayer dollars shall go to infrastructure, housing, healthcare, education, and green energy. This is for the betterment and advancement of the nation and society as a whole. As for the welfare state, as Vladimir Lenin stated, “one who does not work, neither shall he eat.” Thus, welfare will be restricted to either the disabled or lower class citizens with a job. Although it is certainly possible that some won’t receive such benefits, it’s most certainly better than the alternative, which is people leeching off of the welfare system.

Although I can understand the negative effects of excessive government spending, it still isn’t necessarily a bad thing, provided that it serves the people and nation. As for taxes, the rich would be taxed more than the poor, due to having more money which could be used to fund social programs.

Baseline minimum wage of $15 per hour, although it should be increased based on the sector. For instance, an electrician deserves to be paid more than $15, so for example, if workers at an electrician company striked due to wages too low for the job, the government would side with the workers on strike, provided that it isn’t done for corrupt interests.

Social
Abortion, unless the mother’s life or health is at risk, should be illegal. As for cases of rape, although it is an awful action that nobody deserves to experience, the baby is not as fault for the father’s crime. An alternative way for recovery would be to raise the baby. Bare minimum, put it up for adoption

I have no issue with LGBT individuals, provided it’s kept a private topic and they genuinely just want to live their lives. But I oppose the community and a lot of the shit they’ve praised/advocated for in recent days in addition to pride parades. As for marriage, they may have civil unions, but the traditional family structure comes first. Also there are only two genders

For race, while we have made significant progress in the past 100 years, there are still problems among the black and native communities due to poor socioeconomic factors. We must do what we can to help them. And while I personally oppose tearing down confederate statues, as even if they served for malicious purposes back them, we can use them for historical and educational purposes nowadays, the confederate flag should be banned from flying on government buildings.

Pornography, prostitution, etc. are social evils that corrupt society, often involve human trafficking, and ought to be fought against and destroyed on every level. Buyers, pimps, and those that voluntarily take part in such should be arrested. As for those forced into such, they must be rehabilitated.

Marijuana should be legal, but hard drugs remain banned, although it should be treated as a medical issue

Men and women must be paid the same and treated the same

I’m an integrationist/interculturalist. Multiculturalism focuses on differences rather than similarity and kills off the nation’s culture, and forced assimilation is just cruel. Foreign cultures can enrich ours if done in moderation, but in the end, it’s our people, our nation, and our culture. If you immigrate, you should accept our values and understand our people’s way of life, although you may keep yours if you wish to do so

Foriegn
I’m a non-interventionist. What business of ours is it to intervene in other countries unless they provoked first?

And although I am a nationalist, I still seek international cooperation. It’s something I call “Alter-Internationalism”, in which it focuses on international cooperation abroad and nationalism at home

Societal
I’m anti-individualist. Individualism has led to the degradation of society and the rise of things such as support for abortion over a future life, hedonism/legalization of such things, the rise of pride ideology, and the breaking of social cohesion. For me, a society based off of community and family is best.

Punishment
It depends really. Although for things such as the death penalty, I only support it in the case of a particularly heinous crime in which the suspect is guilty beyond any shadow of doubt

Ideological Evolvement
->      ->         ->

Thoughts on the Russia-Ukraine Situation
Ok, as someone who is Russian, I should express my views of this:

I generally oppose the invasion, as Ukrainians are our brothers. And yes Ukraine became pro-NATO because of the invasion of Crimea, even if a large number of it’s residents expressed desire to join Russia. However, Ukraine should NOT align with these neolibtards. So basically fuck Putin, but fuck the EU too, and stop the brother wars. Ideally Ukraine should be neutral too + the invasion only further legitimizes NATO (however I still condemn them taking advantage of the situation). So basically I support Ukraine in their struggle against Russian imperialism, but NATO should not take advantage of such a situation. But again that doesn’t excuse Russia interfering in a sovereign country

Oh and also those performative activists talking about such should stfu, they don’t know shit about the history behind it

Friends
Social Corporatism - a pretty good economic model, basically mine although I have influence from others as well

Distributism - I also support widespread ownership of private property in addition to a lot of your economic ideals. Although I disagree with you on some things such as religious governance and opposition to industrialism

Social Georgism - yes, fuck landlords. Although private property should still exist but must be widespread

Friends
Lelouch - easily my best friend on this site, also we have more or less the same ideology

Nekoqing - another great friend of mine, I knew him for a long time. As for his ideology, it’s good but too radical

Chirotesla - based ideology and also a great friend

Leninisbased556 - too radical and progressive but still a tolerable ideology, and also a good person

DragonRed - eh ideology, decent person

TDRH - ok ideology, nice person

NazBolGANG12 - meh ideology, good person

Comrade Shrek - ok ideology, great friend.

Hoffmann - very good ideology, essentially a more rightist version of myself, and also a great friend

Bman - good ideology although too authoritarian and economically left, good friend as well

- bringe ideology, good person

IvarsBalodis - pretty based although more left than I am

- kinda based ideology, cool person

Friends but ideologically cringe
Councilguy - cringe ideology (albeit understandable knowing the circumstances of his home country), but he’s a good friend of mine

Tony567 - cringe ideology, but good person

BeryAb - same as above

YellingYowie - same as above, also fellow PCB Jackbox enjoyer

Ukraiana - another very cringe ideology, but good person

The Iced cringe ideology but you don’t seem too bad. Also fellow Georgism enjoyer.

Neutral
UserWiki:AshleyHere - very cringe ideology, but personally you seem decent although idk you much

UserWiki:Mossad - based conservatism and nationalism, meh economics, cringe Zionism and individualism. The latter breeds progressivism

Retards
(Unless someone is an actual piece of shit, they won’t be here)

USA and Canada
American Solidarity Party

Former
Democratic-Republican Party

Whig Party

Progressive Party

Black Panther Party

Mexico, Central America, and the Caribbean
Morena

Zapatista Army of National Liberation

Liberty and Refoundation

Sandinista Renovation Movement/Unamos

Democratic Revolutionary Party

South America
Worker’s Party

Peru Libre

Movement For Socialism

Social Convergence

Europe
Labour Factions:

• Blue Labour

• Corbynites

Worker’s Party of Great Britain

Sinn Fein

Podemos

Law And Justice

Asia
Japanese Communist Party

The Middle East
Democratic Union Party

Yemeni Socialist Party

Comments
when relations, also, will you please add me soon? - Hello! I see that your userpage is still under being rewritten now. would you mind adding me soon? -

Yes, I’ll add both of you when I get the chance - Added can you add me when you get the chance-

Leninisbased: add me when you can

Yeah, I’ll add both of you soon -

CS/Nekoqing: Add me when you can

Will do as soon as I get to the relationships tab -

What are you thinking Bessar Esad and Bernie Sanders?

Bashar - not a fan of him in all honesty. Conducting attacks on the Lebanese border and using chemical weapons on his own people is cringe. That being said though, he is the best that Syria has (excluding Rojava).

Bernie - he’s pretty good, I like a lot of his proposals, though he has gone soft on the elite nowadays tbh. Even if I’m socially conservative (for western standards), Bernie is still overall based and am willing to put social views aside for a greater goal. His support for unions is also based. -

I will write the facts about Assad Rojava and Bernie Sanders on my page. Don't forget to check it once in a while.

- will do. But in short why do you dislike Bernie. I won’t lie he has been getting softer towards the elite, but he’s still overall based and better than all the other dems. I can only dream of the ASP gaining more popularity or one of the former parties I mentioned coming back, but I know that will never be the case. also check this quote from Thomas Jefferson out if you want to see my view on things (and I posted it too)


 * [[File:NazBolGANG Human Icon.png]] NazBolGANG12 - Add me gamer

DragonRed

Syria’s Bashar Assad's use of chemical weapons against the men, women and children of his country makes him a war criminal.

ÖS 6:24 · 7 Nis 2017·Twitter Web Clien

As the most powerful nation on earth, the United States must work with the international community to bring peace and stability to Syria.

(Taken from bernie sanders' twitter account.)

Why I don't like Sanders? here it is

- there’s a difference between condemning an action and supporting intervention because of such. Also can you please provide proof that Assad didn’t use chemical weapons? You can like a leader but disapprove of some of their actions (an example is Lukashenko, I like some of his economic policies and his nationalism, but not his border war, brutality, or corruption). Plus Bernie has opposed intervention at plenty of times (for example, he supported the Cuban’s right to protest, but opposed US intervention in Cuba). And if he means “peace and stability” as in trying to end the war instead of supporting regime change, I don’t see the issue with it.

- add me Hoffmann - add me - add me

Yeah. I’ll add you all -

Bman - Add me

Alright -

Add me? - - i have returned to my old ideology

IvarsBalodis - Still based even if less socialist, also add me.

The Iced- Add me please?

Bashar Assad did not use chemical weapons. This is the lie of the western media. Anti-Assad forces used chemical weapons. Assad and Russia blocked it.

He may have said so. When it comes to the Middle East, nothing has changed. Sanders wants American intervention in the Middle East to continue in the same way.

- either way he’s still the best we have (apart from the ASP which has very little chance of success). Especially considering how bad the other leftists are. I watched the DSA national convention and cringed at how hilariously bad it was.

And I’m willing to listen to you on the Assad and Russia blocking chemical weapons if you provide a source.

- Add me plox

Will do -

did you give up on socialism

Kind of, although I still see it as a lesser evil when compared to neoliberals, and also respect plenty of historical socialist leaders -

- Add me?

ComradeRabbit95 - Please add me