UserWiki:Hellothere314

You can see my ideology on my PCBA page

Q&A
Feel free to add questions

Based

 * - Duh.

Good

 * - Your philosophy is very good, and your understanding of dialectics in an intersubjective sense is amazing. We differ in our conception of the individual, with myself dealing with the ways in which the ego orients itself phenomenologically while yourself just using the stirnerite interpritation of that situation. Besides that politically you have a valid critique of communism, that it just merely takes all property and is the final link in the historical chain of economic slavery; this certainly has merit, esspecially the point of ego-communists assuming that hegelian property equates to private and personal property. Property is simply anything we assert as our own, an extension of oneself, it is not asserted by anyone else. The individual can assert the collective as its property in the sense of For Ourselves! creating some justification for ego-communism, along with this the social side of how we direct ourselves directly involves others, thus to fully free oneself we require others, thus some cooperative mode should be seeked. Responding to your critique of me, I agree that an egoistic union is the answer, but it should also be socialist in nature. Of course this should not be an overall system, or a system in general, as that contradicts the framework of the union of egoist, it should be rather a spontanius economic union of egoist, constructing economic activty to the self intrest of all involved. Whether this involves some type of currency in a mutualist sense of more of gift economics is up to all involved.
 * - I like much of your political stances, yet your association with lacan is troubling, though you haven't elaborated much on it.
 * - Ego-communism as a political goal is generally good, as the synthesis and deteritorialization of the poles of ontology requires an effort not only from the ego but from the outside as well. Your ethics though have some problems, hedonism is fine as an exorcism of self interest, yet placing any moral value makes one a slave to desire.

Fine

 * - I appreciate my environment based on my being in the world, and how I directly rely on it, not on some sacred cause.
 * [[File:SituBlart.png]]Blart - Syndicalism, even only in practice, creates a structure that creates some abstraction of communitarianism, which in the sensablilty of Voyer is inherantly embroiled in spectacle, wich you claim to go against. Your conception of spectacle is narrow, failing to see the capitalist mode of spectacle as a subset of a larger concept.