UserWiki:DerVampir666

Friends

 * [[File:Distlib.png]] Distributist Libertarianism - This is the best label for my economic views. Without state intervention in the economy that causes monopolization, per Long, "firms would be smaller and less hierarchical, more local and more numerous (and many would probably be employee-owned)." The best way to achieve distributism is laissez-faire.


 * [[File:Directdem.png]] Direct Democracy - On the local and state level, direct democracy: fosters stability, allows communities to govern themselves, can increase essential freedoms, individuals can choose from various legal codes, and those who pass the best laws will succeed. Although in a country as massive and heterogenous as the US, such a system would be horrible on the national level.


 * [[File:Eugen.png]] Eugenicism - A truly free market will allocate resources to those who (a) have superior talent, ability, and skill and (b) possess the will to power. Considering the role genes have on personality (habits, beliefs, work ethic, time preference, etc.), such a system would make it difficult for those with undesirable characteristics to pass on their genes.


 * [[File:Clib.png]] Classical Liberalism - The original left. My ideology wouldn't exist without yours.


 * [[File:Pinkcap.png]] Pink Capitalism - Free markets don't care about your sexual orientation, gender identity, or race; as long as you have merit, you will succeed. Advertisers will also embrace minorities to boost profitability.


 * [[File:Minarchist.png]] Minarchism - I would like Washington D.C. a lot more if it was a night-watchman state that couldn't be hijacked by populists and special interest groups seeking favorable market distortions.


 * [[File:Jeffersondem2.png]] Jeffersonian Democracy - Basically me, but more agrarian and populist.


 * [[File:Anin.png]] Anarcho-Individualism - Lysander Spoon and Benjamin Tucker were pretty based. Unafraid Jeffersonian democrats.


 * [[File:Existentialist_Anarchism.png]] Existentialist Anarchism - You. I like you.


 * [[File:Mutalist.png]] Mutualism - Despite our drastically different approaches, your long-term vision for society isn't too different from mine.


 * [[File:Ancapf.png]] Anarcho-Capitalism - The Icelandic Commonwealth was based. Plus, competing self-governing associations and free markets are also based.


 * [[File:Cball-CSA.png]] Separatism - Away! Away! Away down south in Dixie! (Also Lysander Spooner supported the Confederacy; and, despite my disagreement with slavery, the long-term consequences of the Union victory has been a disaster for the human race.)


 * [[File:FDF-Pirate.png]] Piratism - Intellectual property is a spook.

Frenemies

 * [[File:Distributist.png]] Distributism - The economics of Chesterton and Belloc were based. But the Catholic Church is a vile institution. Also, too many self-described distributists are confused religious socialists who want to forcefully redistribute property.


 * [[File:Neoliberal-icon.png]] Neoliberalism - We see eye to eye on quite a lot (and Friedman got so much correct), but a tyrannical central government is your long-term mortal nemesis as seen in both China and the United States.


 * [[File:Ancom.png]] Anarcho-Communism - Gift economies suck for interfering in the natural selection process and I want nothing to do with this violent overthrow of capitalism you crave, but otherwise we can be cool.


 * [[File:NatProg.png]] Bull Moose Progressivism - Teddy was a badass, good diplomat, and tried to prevent central banking, but busting trusts is cringe.


 * [[File:Natan.png]] National Anarchism - I'm not sure what to make of you...

Enemies

 * [[File:Pop.png]] Populism - You suck at economics so badly that you convinced me we need a weak central government that you can't hijack.


 * [[File:Corp.png]] Corporatocracy - You only exist because the feds—through copyrights, patents, land grants, licensing requirements, over-regulation, anti-trust, etc.—protect you from becoming chew toys for superior, more innovative, small-scale entrepreneurs.


 * [[File:Ormarxf.png]] Marxism - Yeah, I don't see us getting along.


 * [[File:Stalin.png]] Marxism-Leninism - Scum.


 * [[File:Juche.png]] Juche If only we listened to General MacArthur.

Comments

 * you like eugenics and dixie surely you aren't racist

- Away down south in the land of traitors, rattlesnakes and aligators Right away, come away right away, come away
 * [[File:Vamp.png]] DerVampir666 Hey, I won't lie, the Union version of the song is catchy as hell. Fun fact: Dixie's Land was one of Lincoln's favorite songs.

- What the fuck is this contradictory dogshit.
 * [[File:Vamp.png]] DerVampir666 Basically, between 2018 and 2021, I went from being a classical liberal to a social liberal to a third positionist (or "classical" Fascist if you prefer). During my liberal years I embraced utilitarian ethics. However, because of my nationalistic inclinations and my fascination with the guild system of the Middle Ages, I began exploring third positionist ideologies. Consequently this led me to jump into the existentialist rabbit hole (e.g. Schmitt, Stirner, Heidegger, Nietzsche). Overtime I embraced ethical egoism. So now I advocate for whatever I feel is in my self-interest (especially that which gives me greater autonomy). I sincerely feel that the following is in my self-interest: widespread ownership of private property (more economic independence), competing self-governments (more choice in legal codes), a weak central government (to eliminate market distortions which negatively effect me), and voluntary eugenics schemes (like non-profit organizations paying certain people to get sterilized); and I can go into further detail, but surely you get the point. My ideal society would probably be an anarchist one, but I remain mugged by reality. That is also why I listed several anarchist ideologies as friends. I also have mixed feelings about geoism/land-value taxation, something I can only see being implemented through a monopoly on violence. If anything seems contradictory, it's because I take the best of every ideology that I feel satisfies my ego - even if the sources I extract information from criticize and attack each other. Hope that explains my "contradictory dogshit." :)
 * - Alright, I apologize for calling your beliefs contradictory dogshit. It just seemed very strange when I first looked at it.