UserWiki:Farbades

I can't be arsed to put much here yet. The basics are there atm.

=Overview= WIP

=Timeline= -> ->  ->  ->  -> // -> / -> / -> / -> / -> / ->  ->  (/////)

=Relations= WIP Will get round to it

=Comments= Leninisbased556: holy shit another one
 * [[File:Farb6.png]] - Yes


 * hello another postieeeeeeeeeee (them add me).
 * [[File:Farb6.png]] - Hi! Will do soon.

- If you ever make user relations, add me.
 * - I can also do art for your page if you want.
 * [[File:Farb6.png]] - Will do, and yes, I would appreciate that very much :)

- Add me or whatever when you have the time. Also based set of beliefs.
 * [[File:Farb6.png]] - Will do, thanks, and likewise :)

- Yo, wanna add me to relations when you get to it? :D
 * [[File:Farb6.png]] - Yep, will get round to it.

- Add Please - also would you consider yourself egoist enough to be in the EgoUnion Thing thingy.
 * [[File:Farb6.png]] - I will. As for the UOE, I'll think about it.

- I did the art (the file name is FarbadesArt.png).
 * [[File:Farb6.png]] - Thank you very much! :)

- Add me please? NazBolGANG12 - "Ego-Posadism" wtf Affiliated - Where to start? Hmmm, let us start at your handling of the anarcho-transhumanist page, something you spent quite a bit of time editing. First, you put this ideology as an inherently post-left ideology and imply that via post-scarcity, no one would ever work again. Be as that may, that is not, and has never been about that. One of the original antiwork texts, The Abolition of Work, by Bob Black, pushes off the idea of a fully automated transhumanist society where no one works. In fact, in both Withered Anarchism and Anarchy After Leftism, he targets the former "Social Anarchist", Murray Bookchin, for many reasons, but specifically at "Post-Scarcity Anarchism", a Bookchin text about how, as technology increases, "toil" (work) will disappear, which Black critiques for many reasons (Hunter-gatherers having practically zerowork, technological advancements making the office worker have more work for more time than the medieval peasant, so on so forth). So rather, what you added to that part of the page fits more with the ideas of a CRITIC of postleftism, than the postleft's foundational texts itself. Next, there is the contemporary history portion, which cites Stirner, Godwin, De Cleyre, and Harraway as influences on Anarchist Transhumanism. That is not to say they cannot be, but how does it connect? You do not explain how Stirner's philosophy, or any of the others, connects to the ideas of transhumanists (especially considering the fact that the Cyborg Manifesto is solely about socialist feminism and technology, no mentions of anarchy). In fact, considering how texts like "Morphological Freedom", among other anarchist transhumanist texts, continually refer to the abstract concept of rights, it seems less an individualist philosophy, and more an "abstract individualist" philosophy (a la Classical Liberalism or Civic Libertarianism). Next, you cite the CCRU as an influence. This is not to say they cannot be, but what did they do to influence this specific branch of transhumanism, considering the fact none of the members was anarchists, particularly Nick Land, who ended up embracing the state later on in his Neo-Reactionary Era. You say a ton of stuff about how it's influenced by x-punk and whatnot, and addresses "certain issues" with very little backing. Then you claim, with no basis, that many anarchotranshumanists are postciv. What evidence do you have of this? I mean, considering how green postciv is, I doubt it, but regardless. You then say that this strand of transhumanism is against humanism. Is it? Considering how Nick Land and other accelerationists, particularly the accelerationist blogger Cybertrophic, critique transhumanists for being that: transHUMANISTS. Wanting to mechanise the entire human race for the sake of "eradicating disease" or "living forever" is critiqued by them, saying that they are rather posthumanists, because they believe in transhumanism coming about due to TechnoCapital bringing it about, rather than man bringing it about for humanist reasons. What it rather seems, from my perspective, is what you have added is YOUR perspective on anarchist transhumanism. YOU list accelerationism as an influence, so thus the page must refer to it. YOU are influenced by postciv, so thus the page must reflect that. YOU are influenced by Stirner, so thus the page must reflect that. This goes on so on, so forth.
 * - Also finally another based Satanist
 * [[File:Farb6.png]] - Will do, and yes :>
 * [[File:Farb6.png]] - Basically "Shut up about "morals" and "human rights", you're getting nuked and you're gonna like it." - Johann Kaspar Posadas probably idk