UserWiki:Yoda8soup


 * Test Results=


 * Dozen Values

Ownership Axis: Collective,

Market Axis: Intervening,

Power Axis: Dispersed,

Autonomy Axis: Lenient,

Identity Axis: Inclusive,

Progress Axis: Conventional,

Closest Match: Cooperativism,


 * The Political Sextant Quiz

Classical Marxism 100%

De Leonism 90%

Marxist feminism 100%


 * 6Foundations

Care: 27 / 30

Fairness: 27 / 30

Loyalty: 13 / 30

Authority: 11 / 30

Sanctity: 13 / 30

Liberty: 20 / 30

Estimated Ideology: Libertarian Socialism


 * NewValues

Economic Axis: Socialist

Diplomatic Axis: Balanced leaning internationalist

Civil Axis: Liberal

Societal Axis: Very Progressive

Closest Match: Democratic Socialism


 * 8 Values

Economic Axis: Socialist,

Diplomatic Axis: Internationalist,

Civil Axis: Libertarian

Societal Axis: Very Progressive,

Closest Match: Libertarian Socialism,


 * LeftValues

Neutral: Revolution-54.4% Reform-45.6%

Very Scientific: Scientific-78.1% Utopian-21.9%

Decentralist: Central-31.7% Decentral-68.3%

Internationalist: International-62.5% National-37.5%

Unionist: Party-34.6% Union-65.4%

Ecological: Production-27.85% Nature-72.2%

Progressive: Conservative-27.9% Progressive-72.1%

Closest Match: Centrist Marxism


 * SapplyValues [[File:Screenshot 2022-03-05 8.31.04 AM.png]]


 * BetterCompass [[File:Screenshot 2022-03-04 6.34.13 PM.png]]


 * LiberationValues [[File:Screenshot 2022-03-04 6.46.29 PM.png]]


 * My Broad Beliefs=


 * Economics - The economy would be decentral and the workers would own the means of production. The economy would be a regulated socialist market economy similar to that of Yugoslavia. Paired with a syndicalist economy based on worker self-management/workplace democracy with strong unions and semi-direct syndicalist/council democracy. small businesses of 15-20 workers could be run like private businesses but to grow any bigger the business would have to become a co-op or be run using a syndicalist form of worker self-management but all large businesses would have unions. and all States/provinces would through a syndicalist democracy structure elect representatives by popular vote to the parliament or assembly and then the parliament would run on a kind of semi-direct democracy giving more power to the people than the representative I go more into depth on reps in government. There would be some local democratic planning similar to that of the Inca’s storehouses or Rojava’s decentralized planning. So each community can keep a reserve to survive hardship and that ensures resource security and community self-reliance. Not to be confused with central planning. And on top of all that, there would be a land value tax and a progressive tax to fund the welfare system that would provide socialized healthcare quality public education and public housing developments these housing complexes would be similar to the Viennese style which would include clinics schools markets art studios and communal gardens. The economy would be regulated to ensure environmental protection. And similar to bull moose progressivism if harmful economic forces formed like trusts they would be broken.


 * Government - Natural rights would be at the heart of government and the government would follow the three principles of the people and a five power constitution and be a federal republic. With a control branch for auditing, an examination branch to rake for corruption and ensure the efficiency of public programs, Judicial would oversee the justice system and ensure rehabilitation comes first but also that there is due process, legislative would be the legislature that would be run with semi-direct democracy there would be representatives with term limits elected to a bicameral parliament/assembly through a syndicalist form of semi-direct democracy to ensure that the interests of the people come first and government representatives would have a better understanding of their people because they would be elected from their ranks rather than distant oligarchs and bureaucrats and could be voted out by popular vote at any time, the executive would be voted in by popular vote and all branches including executive would have checks and balances and a division of power and term limits to ensure accountability and keep corruption down. The philosophy of government would be the 3 principles of the people meaning the government would ensure unity and equality like the doctrine of Nationalism, and control of government by the people like the doctrine of Democracy, and welfare and happy and sustainable living like the doctrine of Socialism. Law enforcement would be similar to community policing like in Rojava to ensure that the police would be accountable to the community and represent their community and have heavy community regulation to curb any police brutality. Natural rights would be held dearly to governance.


 * Social - Multiculturalism would be welcome and there would be universal suffrage and equal rights for everybody regardless of race gender or creed. Racism and other forms of prejudice would be looked down upon and fierce counter education would be used to ensure that hate would not spread because the society would be educated enough to see its flaws and harmful effect and would reject it. The line between free speech and hate speech would be drawn if what you are saying is threatening or abusive and prejudiced it will be censored because you would be hurting other's rights in the society and this would protect free speech by ensuring that harmful abuses of the right would not corrupt the freedom of speech. The government would focus on securing domestic affairs and then once the economy is thriving and functioning at home then things like international aid to nations in need would be pursued but the people of the country would come first. Offensive war would be heavily avoided but there would be military to fight defensive wars and ensure national security. with the question of the environment, I believe a Buhtan/Teddy Roosevelt approach would be good not only would fossil fuels be abandoned in favour of geothermal, wind, hydro, solar, etc. But also a massive government project would be undertaken to plant more trees and I say this because Buhtan the only carbon negative country is that way because of its huge forests and largely renewable energy sourcing. The Roosevelt part would come in by the government regulating co-ops and small businesses in the market socialist structure to ensure eco-friendliness but also conservation reserves would be set up by the government to preserve land and protect it from abuse. A culture of environmentalism would be encouraged and people would be educated about the dangers of high carbon emissions and environmental destruction and encouraged to do what they could to help and how to be a part of larger ecological change.


 * influences  =

Sun Yat-sen

Three Principles of the People/Tridemism,

Social Georgism,

Anti- fascism,

Anti-Authoritarianism,

Luxemburgism/Progressive,

Bull Moose Progressivism,

Abraham Lincoln,

DeLeonism/Green Syndicalism,

Geosyndicalism,

Marxism,

Centrist Marxism,

Buddhist Socialism

Indigenism

The Iroquois Confederacy inspired a lot of my political views and I have a deep respect for the Iroquois and all-around Native American civilization because of my experiences growing up for part of my childhood in the Navajo Nation.

Incan decentrally planned economy,

Neozapatismo,

Democratic Confederalism,

Bookchin Communalism,

Environmentalism,

Workplace Democracy,

Titoism,

Eco Socialism,

Democracy,

Malcolm X,

Black Panthers,

Martin Luther King Jr.

W.E.B DuBois,

Ho Chi Minh Thought,

Regulated Market/Co-op Socialism,

Noam Chomsky,

Anarcho-Syndicalism,

Richard Wolff,

Athenian Democracy/Classical and ancient Greek philosophy,

George Orwell,

Liberal Socialism,

Bernie Sanders,

Nelson Mandela,

Mikhail Gorbachev,

Constitutionalism(Sun Yat-Sens 5 power constitution),

Republicanism,

Federalism,

Presidentialism,

Parliamentarianism,

Mum
 * Family

Dad

mums boyfriend

dads wife who sucks and is kinda racist

girlfriend

one of my best friends


 * User Relations:

M99: Really based fellow democratic leftist internationalist anti-imperialist socialist and workplace democracy! Seems to be a nice person and I agree with just about all of your ideology I look forward to learning from you. :D
 * Based

UserWiki:SamKibGuy: very based socialist pro-democracy progressive anti-authoritarian loves Sun Yat-Sen and Luxemburg too! I'm happy to call you Comrade! :D


 * very based economics based ecosocialism I agree with most of what you are saying and you seem very nice I'm excited to learn from you. :)


 * Pretty based I'm a fan of civil libertarianism progressivism and semi-direct democracy. Social democracy is ok you seem nice and I'm looking forward to learning from you. :)


 * I don't know much about anarcho-nihilism but anti-authoritarianism is based and you are nice and you made my icon so thank you. :D


 * Tridemism and Environmentalism are very based and Social Democracy is ok and Transhumanism is cool you seem nice.

ComradeRabbit95: Extremely based economics I would totally live in your utopia I agree with most all of your views and you seem like a nice guy and I like your ball I hope to learn from you in the future. :D

UserWiki:Skyrum536: Incredibly based ideology multiculturalism, progressivism, environmentalism, federalism, pacifism, liberation theology, and Democratic Socialism and your view on markets is great I agree with everything you identify with I'm so excited to learn about your beliefs comrade. :D


 * Very based economics and views on federal republic and council democracy I'm very excited to learn from you. :D


 * Neutral


 * Deep ecology is very based and I am quite a fan of environmentalism myself but I'm not so sure about pre-industrial society though. but you seem really nice and I'm interested in learning from you. :)

Bman: Tridemism and Marxism are based but ML is kinda cringe.


 * based anti-authoritarian and anti-racist but liberal capitalism is a bit cringe but you seem really nice so I'm happy to learn what I can from you. :)


 * Distributism is interesting and civic liberalism is based but monarchism and religion in government is cringe.

Nekoqing: Fellow left-KMT enjoyer very based a little too authoritarian but you seem like a good person and I'm eager to learn about your beliefs. :)


 * Based environmentalist and fellow TikTok hater but authoritarianism and culturally right is a bit cringe you seem like a nice person and you made my template thank you.

NazBolGANG12: Distributism is interesting and somewhat based but I’m not a fan of monarchism or conservatism and I believe in the separation of church and state. but you seem nice and i look forward to learning from you :)


 * You were one of the first people I saw on this site and I want to learn more about egoism but I think environmentalism LGBT neo marxism and situationism are based and you seem nice so I look forward to learning from you.


 * Social Georgism democracy and progressivism is based liberalism is ok and you seem nice.

- I don't know much about egoism but you seem nice and anti-authoritarianism is based so I'm excited to learn from you. :)


 * culturally left is pretty based but liberal capitalism leads to alienation and poverty.

The Iced: Georgism Democracy and culturally left are based but capitalism is a mood killer.


 * I like centrist marxism and ecosocialism but state socialism Juche Maoism and anti-LGBTQ+ are pretty cringe.

DragonRed : Authoritarian is against Rojava state capitalism, and police statism is horrifically cringe. I also don't understand how you can be federal and unitarian so that's strange. Marksoc and Socgeo are pretty cool but you are way too authoritarian for my taste.


 * Cringe

PaleoFabius: Fascism and culturally right is really cringe and genocidal governments are always cringe and your influences are sus as hell but you seem like an ok person.

Reactionary Populism: we have mutual respect for Sun Yat-Sen which is based but culturally right and that type of nationalist which is a bit cringe but you seem very nice and despite our opposing views on many cultural topics I'm eager to learn from you. :)


 * Culturally right authoritarian and state socialist is kinda spooky but we share a liking for Ho Chi Minh and you seem like a nice person I'm interested in learning about your beliefs more in the future. :)


 * environmentalism is epic and based but fascism is really cringe, so is not liking Democracy.


 * Objectivism and capitalism are flawed and cringe I know so many American right-libertarians and I'm friends with many of them and in my opinion, your ideologies economic system creates inequity and under it, the working class suffers and gets abused by the capital owners and the system eats itself so mega cringe. but you seem nice.


 * Zionism is mega cringe basically ethnonationalism also I believe in the separation of church and state and also I dislike genocide and what Israel is doing to Palestine is awful so yea Free Palestine!

SNEEDIVS: You are incredibly cringe and your ideology is awful. Just about everything you are for I'm against. But I do like Roman history Roman Republic, the Roman Empire, the HRE, and Byzantium its all fascinating.

- Awful ideology liking Russia is cringe and authoritarianism mixed with capitalism is a nightmare and your homophobic and transphobic which is backyards but you seem like an ok person though.


 * leave your opinion in Comments=
 * -I'll clear old comments.

DragonRed I got 0 in sappy values ​​prog test. How is take 9 you?

- When it asked questions like is homosexuality against your beliefs I strongly disagree and should trans people be able to adopt and I strongly agree the only one I disagreed with was the is nudism natural question.

- I retook it and I read each question more carefully I posted the new results. - Add me ig - I am aware that many early Roman emperors were Sodomites but that was rectified by Constantine I and Theodosivs I, both excellent emperors.
 * - added
 * - Ok i was just curious thank you for clearing it up ill update the relation. :)
 * [[File:EpicConIcon.png]] NazBolGANG12 - Is it okay if I clean something up here and make the page look better?
 * - of course thank you :)

DragonRed Evaluate me again. Evaluate by looking at my ideology.plz
 * - updated it let me know if that works.

DragonRed tell me. What does Rojava want? What ideas do they have?
 * - They want autonomy they want to be able to govern their own future very similar to the Zapatistas or Catalonia or even Palestine I support that and id rather have an independent democratic secular Kurdistan than a whole oppressive Syria. And their ideas include equal rights socialism communalism egalitarianism democracy and self-determination among others. And they wouldn't have wanted to break away if Assad had represented them and not oppressed them they didn't just have a revolution for no reason.

Assad is doing them the right thing. Because Assad is right. Even if Turkey enters Rojava, I would find it right. Where does it come from Kurdistan? You're not even from the Middle East. you are american. I'm not even originally from the Middle East. I'm saying that so you don't get confused.

Do not see Catalan and Kurdistan the same. Do not see Ireland and Kurdistan the same. Be it Catalan, Ireland has a historical homeland But in historical reality, there is no Kurdistan. The Kurds are not oppressed either. Many Kurds are also against autonomy and independence. There are also those who realize that they are using themselves. They already have everything. They do not deserve to establish a state in those lands. Because the land they live in is not their real homeland.

The man has his own house. He has a taboo. It's like another guy comes in and sits in a room and says this is my place. I wouldn't want it to be allowed neither autonomy nor independence in the Middle East. If the state will not obey the law, I want them to leave their country.

America is a big country. It has extensive lands. to your own country; Get those who want autonomy or independence. Give him autonomy. They are happy in every way.
 * - so I did research and found that the Kurds are native to the regions of Mesopotamia and Bakur which encompasses Rojava so this statement that they aren't native to the land is false and I am not opposed to native American autonomy but the reality is is that Assad is a dictator who is not willing to democratize or fully integrate Kurdistan same with Turkey and also those boarders were drawn up by colonial powers and to say the Kurds aren't oppressed is a fallacy here's a source https://www.opendemocracy.net/en/north-africa-west-asia/looming-genocide-against-kurds-history-should-not-repeat-itself/ there has been multiple massacres as well as various other human rights violations. and yes I live in America but I can still cross-check and see that Assad and turkey do not only not have freedom of the press but flawed democracy although you might not agree with human rights after I read your ideology.


 * Alignments=